Rayat Shikshan Sanstha’s

Karmaveern Bhaurao Patil Polytechnic,Satara

Micro-Project Report

On

“Laws of illumination”

Presented By

Roll No. Name of Student

37 Omkar Nitin Pandit
25 Akash Suryakant Kanase
63 Vaibhav Nitin Kshirsagar
59 Swapnil Pradip Deshmukh

Program: Diploma in Electrical Engineering

Class: TYEE Year ( Semester 5 )

Course: Illumination And Electrification of Buildings (SubjectCode:22530)

Guided By

Prof. Raut Y. B.

Electrical Engineering Department

[2021-22]
 Rayat Shikshan Sanstha’s

Karmaveer Bhaurao Patil Polytechnic, Satara

CERTIFICATE

This is to certify that

Mr / Miss Omkar Nitin Pandit

Mr / Miss Akash Suryakant Kanase

Mr /Miss Vaibhav Nitin Kshirsagar

Mr /Miss Swapnil Pradip Deshmukh

of Year 2021-22( Semester 5 )have successfully completed the Micro-Project work entitled

“Laws of illumination” in the Course Electrical of Program Diploma in Electrical Engineering of

Maharashtra State of Technical Education, Mumbai, Maharashtra State.

Prof. Raut Y.B. Mrs.Patil P.S. Prin.K.C.Shaikh

Guide Head of Department Principal

Date:

Place: satara
 Rayat Shikshan Sanstha’s

Karmaveer Bhaurao Patil Polytechnic, Satara.

Electrical Engineering Department

Academic Year 2021-22

Project Group: EE

Undertaking by Students

We will preserve micro-project and the report in our custody till end of completion of our
program. We assure that we will produce the same whenever we or anybody from our group will
be asked to produce it without fail.

Sr. Roll
No. No. Name of Student Mobile No. Signature

1 37 Omkar Nitin Pandit 8698594417

2 25 Akash Suryakant Kanase 73876 54572

3 63 Vaibhav Nitin Kshirsagar 7387946401

4 59 Swapnil Pradip Deshmukh 9975931421

 INTRODUCTION

The law states that Illuminance at a point on a plane is

proportional to the cosine of the angle of light incident the angle
between the direction of the incident light and the normal to the
plane. It is the point source Illuminance equation.

LAW'S.

1. Inverse Square Law .

2. Lambert's Cosine Law.

1.Inverse Square Law -

If a source of light which emits light equally in all directions be

placed at the centre of a hollow sphere, the light will fall
uniformly on the inner surface of the sphere, that is to say, each
square mm of the surface will receive the same amount of light.
If the sphere be replaced by one of the larger radius, the same
total amount of light is spread over a larger area proportional to
the square of the radius. The amount which falls upon any
square mm of such a surface will, therefore, diminish as the
radius increases, and will be inversely proportional to the square
of the distance.
A similar relation holds if we have to deal with a beam of light
in the form of a cone or pyramid, as shown in Fig. 7.6 (a). If we
consider parallel surfaces which cut the pyramid at different
distances from the source, the areas of these surfaces are
proportional to the square of these
distances, and, therefore, the amount of light which falls on one
unit of the area of these surfaces is inversely proportional to the
square of the distance from the source. This relationship is
referred to as the law of inverse squares.

Let us consider surface area A1 and surface are A2 at distances

r1 and r2 respectively from the point source S of luminous
intensity I and normal to the rays, as shown in Fig.
Hence the illumination of a surface is inversely proportional to
the square of the distance between the surface and the light
source provided that the distance between the surface and the
source is sufficiently large so that the source can be egarded as
a point source.

2. Lambert’s Cosine Law-

Very often the illuminated surface is not normal to the direction
of light as AC in Fig. 7.6 (b) but is inclined as AB. The area
over which the light is spread is then increased in the ratio-
According to this law the illumination at any point on a surface
is proportional to the cosine of the angle between the normal at
that point and the direction of luminous flux.
Teacher Evaluation Sheet

Name of Student: - Omkar Nitin Pandit Enrollment No: 2000410221

Name of Program: - Electrical Engineering Semester: - V
Course Title: - Illumination And Electrification of Code: - 22523
Buildings
Title of Micro – Project: - Laws of illumination
Course Outcomes Achieved:-
- We understand the importance of Laws of illumination
- We understand the uses of Laws of illumination related to our course
- We understand more Knowledge about our course

Evaluation as per suggested Rubric for Assessment of Micro-Project

(Please tick in appropriate cell for each characteristic)

Poor Average Good Excellent

Sr. Characteristic to be
No. assessed ( Marks 1 -3 ) ( Marks 4 -5) ( Marks 6 -8) ( Marks 9-
10)
1 Relevance to the
course

2 Literature survey /
Information collected

3 Project Proposal

4 Completion of target
as per project proposal

5 Analysis of data and

representation

6 Quality of prototype
/Model
7 Report Preparation

8 Presentation

9 Defense
1.1 Micro-Project Evaluation Sheet

Process assessment Product assessment

Total Marks
Part A Part B Individual
Project
Presentation /
Project Methodology Project Report 10
Proposal / Working Viva
( 2 marks ) Model
( 2 marks ) ( 4 marks)
( 2 marks )

Note: Every course teacher is expected to assign marks for group evolution in first 3 columns
and individual evolution in 4th column for each group of students as per suggested rubrics.

1.1.1.1 Comments / suggestion about team work / leadership / inter-personal

communication (if any):

Any other Comment:

Name and designation of faculty member:

Signature:
 Annexure – IV
Teacher Evaluation Sheet

Name of Student: - Akash Suryakant Kanase Enrollment No:-2000410257

Name of Program: - Electrical Engineering Semester: - V
Course Title: - Industrial AC Machine Code: - 22523
Title of Micro – Project: - information on stepper motors
Course Outcomes Achieved:-
- We understand the importance of stepper motors
- We understand the uses of stepper motors related to our course
- We understand more Knowledge about our course

Evaluation as per suggested Rubric for Assessment of Micro-Project

(Please tick in appropriate cell for each characteristic)

Poor Average Good Excellent

Sr. Characteristic to be
No. assessed ( Marks 1 -3 ) ( Marks 4 -5) ( Marks 6 -8) ( Marks 9-
10)
1 Relevance to the
course

2 Literature survey /
Information collected

3 Project Proposal

4 Completion of target
as per project proposal

5 Analysis of data and

representation

6 Quality of prototype
/Model
7 Report Preparation

8 Presentation

9 Defense
1.2 Micro-Project Evaluation Sheet

Process assessment Product assessment

Total Marks
Part A Part B Individual
Project
Presentation /
Project Methodology Project Report 10
Proposal / Working Viva
( 2 marks ) Model
( 2 marks ) ( 4 marks)
( 2 marks )

Note: Every course teacher is expected to assign marks for group evolution in first 3 columns
and individual evolution in 4th column for each group of students as per suggested rubrics.

1.2.1.1 Comments / suggestion about team work / leadership / inter-personal

communication (if any):

Any other Comment:

Name and designation of faculty member:

Signature:
 Annexure – IV
Teacher Evaluation Sheet
Name of Student: - Vaibhav Nitin Kshirsagar Enrollment No:-2000410261
Name of Program: - Electrical Engineering Semester: - V
Course Title: - Industrial AC Machine Code: - 22523
Title of Micro – Project: - information on stepper motors
Course Outcomes Achieved:-
- We understand the importance of stepper motors
- We understand the uses of stepper motors related to our course
- We understand more Knowledge about our course

Evaluation as per suggested Rubric for Assessment of Micro-Project

(Please tick in appropriate cell for each characteristic)

Poor Average Good Excellent

Sr. Characteristic to be
No. assessed ( Marks 1 -3 ) ( Marks 4 -5) ( Marks 6 -8) ( Marks 9-
10)
1 Relevance to the
course

2 Literature survey /
Information collected

3 Project Proposal

4 Completion of target
as per project proposal

5 Analysis of data and

representation

6 Quality of prototype
/Model
7 Report Preparation

8 Presentation

9 Defense
1.3 Micro-Project Evaluation Sheet

Process assessment Product assessment

Total Marks
Part A Part B Individual
Project
Presentation /
Project Methodology Project Report 10
Proposal / Working Viva
( 2 marks ) Model
( 2 marks ) ( 4 marks)
( 2 marks )

Note: Every course teacher is expected to assign marks for group evolution in first 3 columns and
individual evolution in 4th column for each group of students as per suggested rubrics.

1.3.1.1 Comments / suggestion about team work / leadership / inter-personal

communication (if any):

Any other Comment:

Name and designation of faculty member:

Signature:
 Annexure – IV
Teacher Evaluation Sheet
Name of Student: - Swapnil Pradip Deshmukh Enrollment No:-2000410224
Name of Program: - Electrical Engineering Semester: - V
Course Title: - Industrial AC Machine Code: - 22523
Title of Micro – Project: - information on stepper motors
Course Outcomes Achieved:-
- We understand the importance of stepper motors
- We understand the uses of stepper motors related to our course
- We understand more Knowledge about our course

Evaluation as per suggested Rubric for Assessment of Micro-Project

(Please tick in appropriate cell for each characteristic)

Poor Average Good Excellent

Sr. Characteristic to be
No. assessed ( Marks 1 -3 ) ( Marks 4 -5) ( Marks 6 -8) ( Marks 9-
10)
1 Relevance to the
course

2 Literature survey /
Information collected

3 Project Proposal

4 Completion of target
as per project proposal

5 Analysis of data and

representation

6 Quality of prototype
/Model
7 Report Preparation

8 Presentation

9 Defense
1.3 Micro-Project Evaluation Sheet

Process assessment Product assessment

Total Marks
Part A Part B Individual
Project
Presentation /
Project Methodology Project Report 10
Proposal / Working Viva
( 2 marks ) Model
( 2 marks ) ( 4 marks)
( 2 marks )

Note: Every course teacher is expected to assign marks for group evolution in first 3 columns
and individual evolution in 4th column for each group of students as per suggested rubrics.

1.3.1.1 Comments / suggestion about team work / leadership / inter-personal

communication (if any):

Any other Comment:

Name and designation of faculty member:

Signature
1.4 Suggested Rubric for Assessment of Micro-Project

Excellent
Sr. Poor Average Good
Characteristic to
be assessed ( Marks 9 -
No. ( Marks 1 -3 ( Marks 4 -5 ( Marks 6 -8
10)
) ) )
1 Relevance to the Relate to Relate to Take care of Take care
course very few very few at of more
LOs LOs -least one than one
CO CO
2 Literature survey Not more At-least 5 At-least 7 At-least
/ Information than two relevant relevant 10
collected sources sources, at sources, relevant
(primary least 2 most latest. sources,
and latest. most
secondary) latest.
, very old
reference

3 Project Proposal Poor Satisfactory Good Excellent

4 Completion of Completed Completed Completed Completed

target as per less than n 50 to 60% n 60 to 80% more than
project proposal 50% 80%

5 Analysis of data Sample Sufficient Sufficient Enough

and representation size small, and and data
data appropriate appropriate collected
neither sample, sample, by
organized enough data enough data sufficient
nor generated generated and
presented but not which is appropriat
well. organized organized
and not well but poor size.
present. inferences Proper
drawn. inferences
drawn by
organizing
and
presenting
data
through
tables,
charts and
6 Quality of Incomplet Just Well Well
prototype e assembled / assembled / assembled
/ Model fabrication fabricated fabricated /
/ and parts with proper fabricated
assembly. are not functioning with
functioning parts. In proper
well. Not in proper functionin
proper shape, g parts. In
shape, within proper
dimensions tolerance shape,
beyond dimensions within
tolerance and good tolerance
limit. finish / dimension
Appearance appearance. s and
/ finish is But no good
shabby. creativity in finish /
design and appearanc
use of e.
material. Creativity
in design
and use of
material.
7 Report Very short, Nearly Detailed Very
Preparation poor sufficient correct and detailed
quality and correct clear correct,
details description clear
about of methods, descriptio
methods, materials, n of
materials, precautions. methods,
precautions and materials,
and conclusion, precaution
conclusion, Sufficient s. and
but clarity graphic conclusio
are not description. n, Enough
there in tables,
presentatio charts and
n. But not sketches.
enough
graphic
description.
8 Presentation Major Includes Includes Well
informatio major major organized
n is not information information includes
included, but not well and well major
informatio organized organized informatio
n is not and but not n, well
well presented presented Presented.
Organized. well. well.
9 Defense Could not Replied to Replied Replied
reply to considerabl properly to most of
considerab e number of considerable the
le number questions number of questions
of but not very questions. properly.
question. properly.