The rubric outlines criteria for evaluating group presentations on organization, collaboration, content, and presentation skills. For organization, an excellent presentation is well organized and prepared, while a poor one lacks organization. For collaboration, an excellent presentation shows equal contribution from all members, while a poor one only includes work from a few people. For content, an excellent presentation contains valuable beneficial material, while a poor one contains little valuable material. For presentation skills, an excellent one is confident and engaging, while a poor one shows little preparation or confidence.
The rubric outlines criteria for evaluating group presentations on organization, collaboration, content, and presentation skills. For organization, an excellent presentation is well organized and prepared, while a poor one lacks organization. For collaboration, an excellent presentation shows equal contribution from all members, while a poor one only includes work from a few people. For content, an excellent presentation contains valuable beneficial material, while a poor one contains little valuable material. For presentation skills, an excellent one is confident and engaging, while a poor one shows little preparation or confidence.
The rubric outlines criteria for evaluating group presentations on organization, collaboration, content, and presentation skills. For organization, an excellent presentation is well organized and prepared, while a poor one lacks organization. For collaboration, an excellent presentation shows equal contribution from all members, while a poor one only includes work from a few people. For content, an excellent presentation contains valuable beneficial material, while a poor one contains little valuable material. For presentation skills, an excellent one is confident and engaging, while a poor one shows little preparation or confidence.
10 pts 8 pts 6 pts 4 pts Organization The presentation The presentation There were minimal The presentation was well organized, had organizing signs of lacked organization well prepared and ideas but could organization or and had little easy to follow. have been much preparation. evidence of stronger with better preparation. preparation. Collaboration The teammates The teammates The teammates The teammates always worked from worked from sometimes worked never worked from other’s ideas. It was other’s ideas most from other’s ideas. other’s ideas. It evident that all of of the time. And it However, it seems seems as though the group members seems like every did as though certain only few people contributed equally some work, but people did not do worked on the to the presentation. some people are as much work as presentation. carrying the others. presentation. Content Presentation had n Presentation had a Presentation had Presentation exceptional amount good amount of moments where contained little to of valuable material material beneficial valuable material no valuable and extremely to the group was presented but material. beneficial to the as a whole content group. was lacking. Presentation The presenters Presenters were Presenters were not Presenters were were all very occasionally consistent with the unconfident and confident in confident with their level of confidence/ demonstrated little delivery and they presentation preparedness they evidence of did an excellent job however the showed the planning prior to of engaging the presentation was audience but had presentation. audience. not as engaging as some strong Preparation is very it could been for moments. evident. the group