Group Presentation Rubric

CRITERIA
TRAIT
4 3 2 1
Presentation had an Presentation had a Presentation had Presentation
exceptional amount good amount of moments where contained little to
Content of valuable material material and valuable material no valuable
Did the presentation have valuable material? and was extremely benefited the class. was present but as material.
beneficial to the a whole content
class. was lacking.
The teammates The teammates The teammates The teammates
always worked worked from sometimes worked never worked from
from others’ ideas. others’ ideas most from others’ ideas. others’ ideas. It
Collaboration It was evident that of the time. And it However it seems appears only a few
Did everyone contribute to the presentation? Did everyone all the group seems like every as though certain people worked on
seem well versed in the material? members did some work, but people did not do the presentation.
contributed equally some people are as much work as
to the presentation. carrying the others.
presentation.
The presentation The presentation There were The presentation
was well organized, had organizing minimal signs of lacked organization
Organization well prepared, and ideas but could organization or and had little
Was the presentation well organized and easy to follow? easy to follow. have been much preparation. evidence of
stronger with better preparation.
preparation.
Presenters were all Presenters were Presenters were not Presenters were
very confident in occasionally consistent with the unconfident and
delivery and they confident with their level of confidence/ demonstrated little
Presentation
did an excellent job presentation preparedness they evidence of
Did the presenters Speak clearly? Did the engage the
of engaging the however the showed the planning prior to
audience? Was it obvious the material had been
class. Preparation is presentation was classroom but had presentation.
rehearsed? very evident. not as engaging as some strong
it could have been moments.
for the class.
4 – 15 points
3 – 13 points
2 – 11 points
1 – 9 points
Group Members Content Collaboration Organization Presentation Individual Points Group Presentation Points
ABDULHAMID, SAKURHAN
ALGUSO, JEMARIE
ALON, JOSHUA
ALVAREZ, JOHN RONNIER
SESING, KYLA

Group Members Content Collaboration Organization Presentation Individual Points Group Presentation Points
AMIRUDDIN, NASHRA
ARAJANI, ALSAMIR
BANGGUD, ROSE ANN
BAYSA, MONICA
SIBAYAN, JAKE RYAN

Group Members Content Collaboration Organization Presentation Individual Points Group Presentation Points
BORHAN, AL-HAN
CAMPOS, FLORENTINO
CASTAÑEDA, CLAIME GWYNETH
CAUSAL, BENSAR
SUMOSA, GINA

Group Members Content Collaboration Organization Presentation Individual Points Group Presentation Points
CONDE, AARON JOHN
DAMILES, JUSTINE
DARBIN, JOEL JR.
ENRIQUEZ, CARLE-GINO
TANAGON, RANDY

Group Members Content Collaboration Organization Presentation Individual Points Group Presentation Points
ETAC, JOHN MICHAEL
GALVEZ, KARL
GALVEZ, ROBIE
GUMANOD, RONEL
TENEPRE, RENIL

Group Members Content Collaboration Organization Presentation Individual Points Group Presentation Points
JACINTO, ARVIN
JALANG, NURSHAIMA
JIMENEZ, ARIANE
LIMPASAN, ALBINIL
USMAN, FADZRALYN

Group Members Content Collaboration Organization Presentation Individual Points Group Presentation Points
MAHMUD, ALKAMAR
MENDOZA, ZENA MARIE
MUSA, MUSDA
NAONG, DEXTER
VERGARA, JAYSON

Group Members Content Collaboration Organization Presentation Individual Points Group Presentation Points
OLASO, EUMIER FORTUNATO
OROC, JONNIE TEODY
PACLIBAR, JUSTINE KYLE
PIOLA, ALFRED JAKE

Group Members Content Collaboration Organization Presentation Individual Points Group Presentation Points
POLLISCO, REY NERIO
RUIZOL, DARNIE ANN MAE
SADJAIL, MARC RYAN
SALAZAR, KAMILE

Group Members Content Collaboration Organization Presentation Individual Points Group Presentation Points
SAMAIN, RAMESES KHAN
SAMBALOD, JUSTINE
SANTIAGO, AIRIS
SEBASTIAN, DHAN JULIUS