The group presentation rubric assessed presentations based on four criteria: content, collaboration, organization, and presentation. For each criterion, points were awarded based on the degree to which the presentation contained valuable material, showed equal contribution and knowledge from all group members, was well-organized and prepared, and engaged the audience through confident delivery and evident rehearsal.
The group presentation rubric assessed presentations based on four criteria: content, collaboration, organization, and presentation. For each criterion, points were awarded based on the degree to which the presentation contained valuable material, showed equal contribution and knowledge from all group members, was well-organized and prepared, and engaged the audience through confident delivery and evident rehearsal.
The group presentation rubric assessed presentations based on four criteria: content, collaboration, organization, and presentation. For each criterion, points were awarded based on the degree to which the presentation contained valuable material, showed equal contribution and knowledge from all group members, was well-organized and prepared, and engaged the audience through confident delivery and evident rehearsal.
Did the Presentation Presentation Presentation Presentation
presentation contained had moments had a good had an have valuable little to no where amount of exceptional material? valuable valuable material and amount of 40 points material. material was benefited the valuable present, but class material and as a whole was content was extremely lacking beneficial to the class Collaboration
Did everyone The The team The The
contribute to teammates mates teammates teammates the never worked sometimes worked from always presentation? from others’ worked from others’ ideas worked ideas. others’ ideas most of the from others’ Did everyone It seems as However, it time. And ideas. 20 points seem well though seems as it seems like It was versed in the only a few though everyone evident that material? people certain did some all of the worked on people did work, but group the not do as only some members presentation. much work people are contributed as the other. carrying the equally to the presentation. presentation.
Organization
Was the The The The
presentation presentation There were presentation presentation well organized lacked minimal had was well and easy to organization signs of organizing organized, 20 points follow? and had little organization ideas but well evidence of or could have prepared and preparation. preparation. been much easy stronger with to follow. better preparation. Presentation
Did the Presenters Presenters Presenters Presenters
presenters were were not were were all Speak clearly? unconfident consistent occasionally very Did they and with the level confident confident in engage the demonstrated of with their delivery and audience? little confidence/ presentation they did an evidence of preparedness however the excellent job 20 points Was it planning they showed presentation of engaging obvious the prior to to the was not as the class. material had presentation. audience, but engaging as Preparation been had some it could have is very rehearsed? strong been for the evident. moments. class.