Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ABSTRACT
In developing countries where concrete is widely used, the high and steadily increasing cost of cement has made
construction very expensive. This, coupled with the deleterious effect of cement production on the environment has
led to studies on various materials termed 'pozzolans' which could be used as partial replacement for cement in
concrete.
Periwinkle shells were sourced from Warri in Delta State, Nigeria, cleaned and calcined in an electric muffle furnace
at 1000oC and thereafter ground and sieved through BS sieve (75 microns) to fine ash. Preliminary tests comprising
sieve analysis, specific gravity, consistency, setting time and soundness were conducted on the PSA and Ordinary
Portland Cement used in the study. Workability and strength tests were also carried out on fresh and hardened
concrete made from the study materials.
The results showed that the compaction factor increased with increasing PSA replacement, while the slump
decreased with increasing PSA content. The initial and final setting times increased with increasing proportion
of PSA. The specific gravity of PSA was less than that of OPC. The compressive strength of concrete specimens
decreased as the percentage of PSA increased.
Periwinkle shell ash developed good strength in concrete and could be used as a partial replacement for cement if
appropriate technology is developed for its proper utilization.
1. INTRODUCTION
Periwinkle shell is a waste product generated from the consumption of a small greenish-blue marine snail
(periwinkle), housed in a V shaped spiral shell, found in many coastal communities within Nigeria and word-wide is
a very strong, hard and brittle material.
These snails called periwinkle are found in the lagoons and mudflats of the Niger Delta between Calabar in the East
and Badagry in the West of Nigeria, the people in this area consume the edible part as sea food and dispose off the
shell as a waste, though few people utilize the shell as coarse aggregate in concrete in areas where there are neither
stones not granite for purposes such as paving of water logged areas e.t.c., but a large amount of these shells are still
disposed off as waste and with disposal already constituting a problem in areas where they can not find any use for
it, and large deposits have accumulated in many places over the years.
It is with this view that this research seeks to investigate into the suitability of Periwinkle Shell Ash as Partial
Replacement for Ordinary Portland Cement in Concrete.
Also the interest into this research was generated as a result of the fact that periwinkle shell being what it is and with
all the properties it possess should be useful for something else, if well processed, especially as a partial replacement
of cement apart from being a light weight aggregate, as people have being so curious for sometime now about
finding an alternative to OPC that would be cheaper, readily available and requiring indigenous technology and
equipment.
The aim of this research is to assess the suitability of periwinkle shell ash (PSA) as partial replacement for ordinary
Portland cement.
2. EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
2.1 Materials
2.1.1 Periwinkle Shell Ash (PSA)
The periwinkle shells were obtained from Warri in Delta State, they were free of dirt and organic matters, the
periwinkle had been removed from the shells.
428
IJRRAS 10 (3) ● March 2012 Olutoge & al. ● Assessment of the Suitability of Periwinkle Shell Ash
The shells were calcined in an electric muffle furnace at 1000 0 C and thereafter grinded to fine particles with the aid
of a grinding machine.
The resulting ash was then sieved through BS sieve (75microns) to obtain a fine ash.
2.2 Methods
2.2.1 Preliminary Tests
Some preliminary tests carried out on PSA include sieve analyses, specific gravity determination, consistency test,
determination of setting time, and determination of soundness.
2.2.3 Mixing
For this study, a mix ratio of 1:2:4 and a water /cement ratio of 0.45 was used. A systematic replacement of OPC
with 0%, 5%, 10%, 15% and 20% of PSA was carried out.
Mixing was done manually using a shovel, it was done first with the dry constituent till the mix attained a uniform
distribution and colour. The required water was added gradually and it was thoroughly mixed to obtain a workable
mix.
429
IJRRAS 10 (3) ● March 2012 Olutoge & al. ● Assessment of the Suitability of Periwinkle Shell Ash
Average = 2.50
GS = (W2 – W1)
(W4 – W1) – (W3 – W2) (1)
Table 2, shows that the average specific gravity of PSA is 2.50 and this is less than the specific gravity of OPC
cement which is 3.15, then it can be deduced that greater volume of cementitious material will result from mass
replacement.
430
IJRRAS 10 (3) ● March 2012 Olutoge & al. ● Assessment of the Suitability of Periwinkle Shell Ash
Table 5, shows that the initial and final setting time of the OPC/PSA mix increases with increasing replacement, this
means that PSA concrete is not susceptible to the problem of flash and false set
Table 7, shows that the slump decreases with increasing replacement, while the compacting factor increases with
increasing replacement and it still falls within the values for normal range of concrete which lies between 0.80 and
0.92
Table 8, shows that the periwinkle shell ash contains the main chemical constituents of cement which are CaO,
SiO2, Al2O3, Fe2O3, even though the percentage is lower compared with that present in the ordinary Portland
cement.
431
IJRRAS 10 (3) ● March 2012 Olutoge & al. ● Assessment of the Suitability of Periwinkle Shell Ash
Cube Date Cast Date Age for Weight Density Crushing Crushing Averages
No Tested Testing of Cube of Cube Load (KN) Strength Crushing
(kg) kg/cm3 (N/mm2) Strength
(N/mm2)
1 27/05/10 30/05/10 3 days 8.23. 2439 340 15.11 15.45
2 8.11 2403 355 15.78
1 27/05/10 03/06/10 7 days 9.00 2667 385 17.11 17.00
2 8.92 2643 380 16.89
1 27/05/10 10/06/10 14 days 9.34 2767 405 18.00 18.34
2 9.42 2791 420 18.67
1 27/05/10 17/06/10 21 days 9.68 2868 505 22.44 22.11
2 9.73 2883 490 21.78
1 27/05/10 24/06/10 28days 9.97 2954 550 24.44 24.11
2 10.05 2978 535 23.78
Cube Date Cast Date Age for Weight Density Crushing Crushing Averages
No Tested Testing of Cube of Cube Load Strength Crushing
(kg) kg/cm3 (KN) (N/mm2) Strength
(N/mm2)
1 27/05/10 30/05/10 3 days 8.00 2370 325 14.44 14.00
2 8.18 2424 305 13.36
1 27/05/10 03/06/10 7 days 8.35 2474 360 16.00 16.00
2 8.20 2430 360 16.00
1 27/05/10 10/06/10 14days 8.87 2628 400 17.78 18.11
2 8.93 2646 415 18.44
1 27/05/10 17/06/10 21days 9.12 2702 440 19.56 20.34
2 9.22 2732 475 21.11
1 27/05/10 24/06/10 28days 9.43 2794 505 22.44 22.33
2 9.66 2862 500 22.22
Table 9c: Compressive Strength of Concrete made using 10% PSA replacement
432
IJRRAS 10 (3) ● March 2012 Olutoge & al. ● Assessment of the Suitability of Periwinkle Shell Ash
Table 9d: Compressive Strength of Concrete made using 15% PSA replacement
Date Date Age Weight Density of Crushing Crushing Averages
Cube Cast Tested for of Cube Cube kg/cm3 Load (KN) Strength Crushing
No Testing (kg) (N/mm2) Strength
(N/mm2)
1 28/05/10 31/05/10 3 days 8.68 2572 265 11.78 11.45
2 8.73 2587 250 11.11
1 28/05/10 04/06/10 7 days 8.97 2658 290 12.89 13.00
2 9.00 2667 295 13.11
1 28/05/10 11/06/10 14days 9.28 2750 345 15.33 15.00
2 9.17 2717 330 14.67
1 28/05/10 18/06/10 21days 9.50 2815 395 17.56 17.23
2 9.58 2839 380 16.89
1 28/05/10 25/06/10 28days 9.83 2913 420 18.67 19.00
2 10.02 2967 435 19.33
Table 9e: Compressive Strength of Concrete made using 20% PSA Replacement
Cube Date Date Age Weight Density of Crushing Crushing Averages
No Cast Tested for of Cube Load (KN) Strength Crushing
Testing Cube kg/cm3 (N/mm2) Strength
(kg) (N/mm2)
1 29/05/10 01/06/10 3 days 8.20 2430 230 10.22 10.00
2 7.99 2367 220 9.78
1 29/05/10 08/06/10 7 days 8.75 2593 270 12.00 11.67
2 8.50 2519 255 11.33
1 29/05/10 15/06/10 14days 9.02 2673 285 12.67 13.00
2 9.16 2714 300 13.33
1 29/05/10 22/06/10 21days 9.30 2756 325 14.44 14.33
2 9.14 2788 320 14.22
1 29/05/10 29/06/10 28days 9.75 2889 340 15.11 15.34
2 9.88 2979 350 15.56
Tables a, b, c, d, e and f , above shows that the crushing strength of PSA/OPC concrete decreases as the percentage
of PSA increases and the crushing strength increases as the age of curing increases for each of the percentage
replaced this means that the OPC/PSA concrete get stronger with time and that it is suitable for construction in
which much strength is not required at the initial stage.
433
IJRRAS 10 (3) ● March 2012 www.arpapress.com/Volumes/Vol10Issue3/IJRRAS_10_3_08.pdf
FIGURE 1: Relationship between crushing strength and PSA replacement at 3, 7, 14, 21 and 28 days.
4. CONCLUSIONS
Based on the research work carried out, the following conclusions were made:
(1)The Slump and compaction factor values for the concrete shows that the slump decreases with increasing Periwinkle Shell Ash
replacement while the compacting factor increases with increasing PSA content and the values falls within the value for normal range of
concrete.
(2)The Initial and final setting time of the OPC/PSA mixes (at 5% and 10%) was found to increase with increasing replacement, this
means that PSA concrete is not susceptible to the problem of flash and false set.
(3)The OPC/PSA mix obtain had standard consistency of 28% which is greater than that of OPC alone (26-26-5%) that it replaced.
(4)The specific gravity of the PSA obtained is less than that of the OPC that it replaced which means a considerable greater volume of
cementitious materials will result from mass replacement.
(5)It was discovered that the Periwinkle Shell Ash contains all the main chemical constituents of cement though in lower percentage
compared with that of OPC which means it will serve as a suitable replacement if the right percentage is used.
(6)The compressive strength of PSA/OPC concrete specimens shows that the crushing strength decreases as the percentage of Periwinkle
Shell Ash (PSA) increases ands the crushing strength increases as the age of curing increases for each of the percentage replacement.
5. REFERENCES
[1]. Abatan, A.O., (1990), “Water – Aggregate Ratio and Compaction for soil Crete Block Production”
[2]. Abrams, P.A., (1918), „Design of Concrete mixes”, Structure of materials Research Laboratory, News Institution Chicago, pp 309-30
Bill no 1
[3]. Adepegba, D.A (1975), “A Comparative Study of Normal Concrete which contains laterite fines Instead of Sand” Building Science, (10),
pp 135-141.
[4]. Bahrner V., (1940), “Report on Consistency Tests on Concrete Made by means of Vebe Consistometer”, Report No 1, Svenka Comenfor,
Stockholum.
[5]. Balogun . I. A, (2004). Periwinkle Shells and Palmkernel Shells as Coarse Aggregates”. Unpublished B.Tech Thesis, Ladoke Akintola
University Of Technology, Ogbomoso Oyo State Nigeria
[6]. Beredugo Y.O., (1984), “Periwinkle Shells as Coarse Aggregates” Nigerian Building and Road Institute Technical Paper 2.
[7]. British Standard Institution “Methods for Sampling and testing Mineral Aggregate”, BS 812.
[8]. British Standard Institution, (1985). “Structural use of Concrete”. BS 8110.
[9]. Falade, F , (1991), “The use of Palmkernel Shell Ash as Substitute for Sand in Cocrete” IAHS (xixth) World Congress, Ales
Ledex,France,pp 558-569
[10]. Falade, F., (1995). “An investigation on Periwinkle shells as Coarse Aggregates in Concrete.”
[11]. Jackson, N and Dhir, R.K (1998). “Civil Engineering Materials.” Macmillan, pp114.
[12]. Jackson, N. and Ravinbdra K.D (1996). “Civil Engineering Materials”, pp 161.297
[13]. King, B. (1999). “A Brief Introduction to Pozzolanas”, American Concrete Institution, PP.62
[14]. Malhotra, V.M and Mehta, P.K., (1996). “Pozzolanic and Cementitious Materials”, Gordon and Breach Publishers, Amsterdam.pp47
[15]. Nevile, A.M. and Brooks, J.J, 2003 “Concrete Technology”, Longman Publishers, Essex CM 20 2JE, England
[16]. Osayinmi, (1986), “The use of Periwinkle Shells and Palmkernel Shells as Coarse Aggregates”
[17]. Punnia, B.C. (1980), “Reinforced Concrete Structures,” Standard Publishers, Vol. 1,2. Pp. 48
[18]. Dahunsi, B.I.O and Bamisaye, J.A (2002), “Use of Periwinkle Shells Ash, (PSA) as a Partial Replacement for Cement in Concrete.
Paper presented at the annual conference of the Material Society of Nigeria, Akure, Nigeria.
434