You are on page 1of 9

The Sigma Phase Transformation in

Austenitic Stainless Steels

Nucleation is found to be the rate-limiting step


in the ferrite to sigma phase transformation

BY J. M. VITEK AND S. A. DAVID

ABSTRACT. The mechanism of the sigma ucts found in stainless steels, the sigma which sigma phase is found and often
phase transformation in steels was stud- phase is of particular interest. It is a hard, hasten the kinetics of the sigma phase
ied by examining the aging behavior of intermetallic phase with a complex tetra- transformation (Refs. 8, 17-20). Howev-
Types 308 and 308CRE austenitic stainless gonal structure. Its occurrence, proper- er, the exact role that these factors play
steels. Various initial conditions were ties and structure were reviewed exten- in promoting sigma phase formation is still
examined: homogenized, homogenized sively by Hall and Algie (Ref. 2). Since its somewhat obscure.
and aged, and as-welded. It was found first identification as B (for brittle) phase Studies have been conducted recently
that the sigma phase transformation was (Ref. 3), sigma phase has been associated on the phase stability of Types 308 and
nucleation controlled. Phase analysis with the degradation of mechanical prop- 308CRE* stainless steel, both in the as-
showed that the long-range diffusion erties, particularly in stainless steels and welded (Ref. 21) and initially homoge-
necessary to produce chromium-rich sig- other high alloy steels. nized (Ref. 22) conditions. During the
ma phase plays only a secondary role in As a result of the association of sigma course of this work, several new results
the sigma phase transformation, i.e., phase with embrittlement, the conditions related to the sigma phase transformation
long-range diffusion is not rate control- for sigma phase formation, as well as the were found. The objective of this paper
ling. Furthermore, it was found that large mechanism of the transformation, are of is to incorporate these new results with
scale atomic displacements, present as a considerable interest. In spite of numer- those of previous investigations in order
result of either recrystallization or defor- ous studies on this subject, many of the to arrive at a better understanding of the
mation, accelerate the sigma transforma- details of the sigma phase transformation controlling factors in the sigma phase
tion significantly. The conclusions remain unknown. This may be due, in transformation. In turn, a greater knowl-
reached are consistent with extensive part, to the very sluggish nature of the edge of the rate-controlling mechanism in
previous observations on the sigma sigma phase transformation, which the sigma phase transformation will pro-
phase transformation reported in litera- results in uncertainties in the final equilib- vide insight into how sigma phase forma-
ture over the last 30 years. rium phase constitution. Nonetheless, tion can be better controlled.
several factors are known to influence
Introduction the sigma phase transformation. Cold Experimental Details
work prior to aging (Refs. 4-11), as well
The phase stability of wrought stainless as the presence of ferrite (Refs. 11-16), Two alloys were used in this study:
steels as well as welded stainless steels have been shown to significantly Type 308 stainless steel and Type 308
has been the subject of many investiga- enhance the kinetics of sigma phase for- stainless steel with controlled residual ele-
tions. Such investigations have dealt with mation. The influence of the ferrite phase ment additions. The latter alloy typically
either fully austenitic (7) steels or duplex is especially important when dealing with contains small additions of phosphorus,
austenite plus ferrite (7 + <5) steels. During weld metals where duplex y + 8 struc- titanium and/or boron, and is referred to
elevated temperature aging, a variety of tures are common and, in fact, are pre- as Type 308CRE stainless steel. Others
transformations can occur. For example, ferred, so as to reduce hot cracking have shown (Ref. 23) that such additions
Weiss and Stickler (Ref. 1) have shown tendencies during welding. Furthermore,
that in the case of Type 316 austenitic elemental additions such as silicon
*CRE = Controlled Residual Elements, see
stainless steel, numerous carbides and increase the compositional range over
Experimental Details.
intermetallic phases appear upon ele-
vated temperature aging.
Of the various transformation prod-
Table 1—Compositions of Alloys Used in This Investigation

Composition, wt-%'a*
Paper presented at the 65th Annual AWS Alloy Condition Cr Ni Mn Si C S Nj
Convention in Dallas, Tex., April 8-13, 1984.
308 Homogenized 20.9 10.3 1.6 0.49 0.068 0.012 0.039 0.018 <0.01 <0.001
J M. VITEK is a Research Staff Member in the 308 Welded 20.2 9.4 1.8 0.46 0.053 0.008 0.058 0.018 <0.01 0.002
Electron Microscopy Croup andS. A. DA VID is 308CRE Homogenized 20.0 10.0 2.0 0.62 0.043 0.015 0.011 0.011 0.57 0.002
Croup Leader of the Materials Joining Labora- 308CRE Welded 19.8 9.9 2.0 0.61 0.036 0.014 0.022 0.012 0.50 0.003
tory, Metals and Ceramics Division, Oak Ridge
National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tenn. '•'Balance Fe.

106-s | APRIL 1986


!* r > " <r «... • ' -• .£>
(a) \ .I
r; (<: '(b) • < / J
*- ig &, ft

' .•
/£<S?
"~-" $ -
•if*
ii
, -

E
tf*^
f

v
^- /
-a
. '
/>
f
- P '
• i-^
^

~~/~ 4'.>
p, O - * - ^
f / * -

'- '
t a?

), t
+ tt
* •'>h,- \ X
/
'.<^i-^. ~>t*~i 6 >* ; ^ . ' "•- J 1": a

# C v aO • -<ZC 'at r » , •/ ? _>'


/ ^ 7
> '- * .-. v' ft>n ° A^—r s f

C. - . * • " ^ 0 £- \ ) fa. , .
y.' •;' •« .: v.:.-
;
• * * . . '
> - i* . ^ - . -,- 7
•r- * C^
>
1
a• - 1
' / *" O, ^ f f
• /
:.i>-
f ~— \ c-
.-• r

/ ===-" . • / , •>. - -

/ ' \\ " > < / J- 1


/. \ >*v \i * * •oa *• U --
^ - w ™ _ a r
ws4.

m
: t i
I ™—•-. E
i».
- • -~\ v

100 t m ...; ?* 100 pim

kl i- T " " 1 i ^

~~Q~r~A , ^ . / : . f^T ^ . i ••••'.hvVilrA- ^


fig. 7— Typical initial microstructures in: A — homogenized Type 308; B — homogenized Type 308CRE; C —as-welded Type 308; D —as-welded Type
308CRE stainless steels

result in improved elevated temperature as-welded material was taken from multi- Results and Discussion
creep properties. The major element pass gas tungsten arc (GTA) welds depos-
compositions of the t w o alloys studied ited on type 304L stainless steel base In the t w o steels presently investi-
are given in Table 1. In the present case, plates. The as-welded microstructures of gated, as well as in related steels, four
the major difference between the t w o both steels were duplex ferrite plus aus- phases are commonly found: austenite,
alloys was their titanium content. tenite structures, with ferrite levels of ferrite, sigma and M23C6 carbide. A com-
Several initial conditions were exam- approximately 10% —Figs. 1C and 1D. posite of typical EDS spectra from these
ined: homogenized, homogenized and Various aging treatments were given four phases is presented in Fig. 2. A
cold worked, and as-welded. The to the alloys in these three initial condi- comparison of the relative peak heights
homogenization treatment for both tions. Aging was at 550, 650, 750 or of chromium and iron clearly shows an
alloys was the same: 1080°C/1 h 850°C (1022, 1202, 1382 or 1562°F) for increase in chromium content for the
(1976°F/1 h), followed by a water times up to 10,000 h. Prior to aging, order of phases given above. A compar-
quench. The homogenized Type 308 samples were encapsulated in quartz ison of nickel to iron peak heights in Figs.
stainless steel structure was fully austenit- tubes filled with subatmospheric argon. A 2A, B and C also shows that the nickel
ic, with no carbides or ferrite present — JEOL 100CX transmission electron micro- content is substantially higher in austenite.
Fig. 1A. In contrast, the homogenized scope was used for the structural and Relative absorption effects can be
Type 308CRE steel had a duplex struc- compositional analysis of the aged speci- ignored when comparing only chromium,
ture, with approximately 5-10% ferrite in mens. Microscopy specimens were pre- iron and nickel peaks. In terms of actual
an austenite matrix —Fig. 1B. A section of pared by electropolishing 3 mm (0.12 in.) concentrations, considering only the iron,
the Type 308 stainless steel rod was cold diameter discs ground to a thickness of chromium and nickel constituents, typical
swaged 20% to yield the homogenized 0.25 mm (0.01 in.) prior to thinning. normalized compositions are (in weight
and cold-worked material. Cold rolling Composition analyses were made using percent): 69 Fe, 23 Cr, 8 Ni (austenite); 68
did not affect the phase constitution of an energy dispersive spectrometer (EDS); Fe, 28 Cr, 4 Ni (ferrite); 59 Fe, 38 Cr, 3 Ni
the homogenized Type 308 stainless the procedure used has been described (sigma); and 17 Fe, 79 Cr, 4 Ni (carbide).
steel; it remained 100% austenite. The in detail elsewhere (Ref. 24). This trend in relative compositions has

WELDING RESEARCH SUPPLEMENT 1107-s


| KEUEX its composition in order to achieve meta-
stable equilibrium. This compositional
I cb) |||||||| fj; adjustment is independent of the ferrite
_W~ HbHHITE II | " j to sigma transformation. The final (meta-
stable) equilibrium composition of ferrite
3^ is a function of aging temperature (Ref.
-m
SM ••
26). Upon aging homogenized Type
308CRE stainless steel at 650°C (1202°F),
residual ferrite was found after aging
Ni
times of 10,000 h. The presence of the
iiiiNHiiliiiiliii; ' 1 ' ni 1 residual ferrite was relatively rare. Analy-
09 ' 92 '94 '96 08
sis of both the ferrite and sigma phase
ENERGY ( k e V ) was performed, and the representative
EDS spectra are shown in Fig. 4. A com-
• KEUEX
; DfTH 1 • EUEX !i,ii parison of the relative chromium to iron
C
II C ^II1 ,te (d) TT ...Cr. peak heights shows that the chromium
IttlKllllltt
* J ~ SIGMA " .J.
it
Wmiiiniiii liHIIII T | j | |
J J M 2 3 C 6 CARBIDE
J
content in ferrite has increased signifi-
cantly (compare Figs. 2B and 4A), and that
^2
3" ftj.. j
the sigma phase and ferrite have essen-
tially identical iron, chromium and nickel
liitliim contents. Analysis of the major constitu-
,;.., .._,|
Mil_ tMJI N J I IHF =" 11 ents (iron, chromium and nickel) in the
I
1 rm:
IffH
t*y| Hllliilllllll 1
1' ILL , t w o phases yielded the following compo-
sitions: ferrite —60 Fe, 37 Cr, 3 Ni; sig-
98 92 84 66 0: 92 94 06. i * 08
tt r t i l Si ma — 57 Fe, 38 Cr, 4 Ni. Therefore, under
these aging conditions, the ferrite did not
ENERGY(keV) ENERGY(keV) transform to sigma phase, even though
Fig. 2 — Typical EDS spectra of phases found in Type 308 stainless steel essentially no further diffusion was neces-
sary to achieve the chromium concentra-
tion found in sigma phase. This result
been noted often, and the mechanism of relatively fast. This situation is analogous dramatically shows that the nucleation of
the sigma phase transformation has often to classical homogeneous nucleation sigma phase is the rate controlling step in
been associated with it. However, as our experiments with liquid droplets (Ref. 25). the transformation.
results will show, the composition change In these experiments, liquid droplets
Sigma phase formation is characteristi-
necessary for sigma phase formation is were undercooled in an inert medium,
cally very sluggish in a homogenized, fully
not the rate-controlling step in the trans- and once nucleation occurred, the drop-
austenitic steel. In the present study, the
formation. The first results presented will let solidified very quickly. However, solid-
first signs of sigma formation in a homo-
be related to the nucleation of sigma ification of one droplet does not influ-
phase, and their interpretation will be ence the nucleation (and solidification) of
given. Second, the growth of sigma others so that at one time both complete-
phase will be addressed, including the ly liquid and completely solid droplets
effect of the chromium enrichment nec- exist; partially solidified droplets are not
essary for sigma phase formation. observed.
During the aging of Type 308 stainless The ferrite to sigma phase transforma-
steels, the first reaction observed was the tion may be viewed as a solid-state anal-
formation of M23Q carbide (Ref. 21). For ogy to the nucleation experiments. The
alloys with an initial duplex austenite plus transformation occurs in what may be
ferrite structure, this carbide formed at assumed to be a relatively inert matrix,
the ferrite/austenite interfaces. With fur- namely the austenite. If nucleation of the
ther aging, ferrite consolidation occurs, sigma phase is the critical rate-controlling
followed by sigma phase formation. The step, once nucleation does occur, subse-
transformation proceeds at the fastest quent growth of sigma is relatively rapid.
rate at aging temperatures of 650° and Hence, partially transformed ferrite grains
750°C (1202° and 1382°F). Upon exami- should be rarely found, as was the case.
nation of many specimens aged under a Also, the transformation of one ferrite
variety of conditions, a trend was noted grain is proposed to be relatively inde-
with respect to the ferrite transformation pendent of the behavior of other ferrite
to sigma. It was rare to find a partially grains. Even though sigma formation
transformed ferrite grain. Instead, at results in some minimal matrix depletion
intermediate stages of aging, the initial in chromium, it is suggested that the
ferrite areas remained intact (except for nucleation of new sigma grains is not
some dissolution and carbide formation) overly sensitive to these matrix composi-
or were transformed completely to sig- tion changes.
ma. This characteristic is illustrated in Fig. Further evidence supporting the con-
3. Singhal and Martin (Ref. 11) observed clusion that nucleation is the rate-control-
the same phenomenon earlier. The fact fig. 3 — Intermediate stage of aging in welded
ling step was found in the aging behavior
that partially transformed ferrite areas Type 308 stainless steel (750°C/100 h). Ferrite
of initially homogenized Type 308CRE areas were either: A — untransformed or B —
were rarely observed indicates that once stainless steel, containing 5-10% ferrite — completely transformed. The M23C6 precipi-
nucleation of sigma phase begins, the Fig. 1B. It has been shown elsewhere tate outlines the original, as-welded austenite/
subsequent growth of sigma phase is (Ref. 26) that during aging, ferrite changes ferrite interface

108-s I APRIL 1986


genized, fully austenitic Type 308 stain- atomic displacement, but not necessarily gishness of the transformation.
less steel were found after aging 5000 h long-range diffusion, is important in pro- The arguments given above indicate
at 750°C (1382°F). It is also well known moting sigma phase formation is support- that the formation of sigma nuclei is the
(Refs. 4-11) that cold work prior to aging ed by the microstructures found in a rate-controlling step in the sigma transfor-
significantly hastens the sigma phase homogenized Type 308 stainless steel mation. The results suggest that the actual
transformation. This was confirmed in the creep specimen tested at 650°C (1202°F) crystallographic rearrangements neces-
present investigation. Sigma phase was for 8500 h to failure. The microstructure sary to form a sigma nucleus are critical.
found after aging homogenized and cold- in the unstressed shoulder section (Fig. Furthermore, the results indicate that the
worked Type 308 stainless steel only 100 6A) is comparable to that found in diffusion necessary to form the chromi-
h at 750°C (1382°F). However, a more homogenized and aged specimens: um-enriched (compared to ferrite) sigma
detailed investigation of the deformed extensive carbide formation (M23Q) in an phase is not a rate-controlling step in the
and aged microstructure showed that austenite matrix with little, if any, sigma nucleation process. Several features sup-
partial recrystallization had taken place. phase present (in fact no sigma phase port the idea that the diffusion is of
Furthermore, the sigma phase was was found in the shoulder specimen secondary importance. First, as shown in
present only in the recrystallized areas of examined). However, the microstructure Fig. 4, under some aging conditions the
the foils, whereas no sigma phase was in the gage section (Fig. 6B) was consider- ferrite and sigma had essentially identical
found in the deformed areas — Fig. 5. This ably different. Extensive sigma phase for- compositions, and yet some ferrite
evidence strongly suggests that it is not mation was found, primarily at grain remained untransformed after aging
the cold work itself that accelerates sigma boundaries. Thus, in the deformed gage 10,000 h at 650°C (1202°F). Thus, even
phase formation, but rather the recrystal- section, where significant atomic dis- when no diffusion is necessary, the trans-
lization that subsequently occurs during placement occurred due to deformation formation does not proceed automatical-
aging that acts as a catalyst in the sigma during testing, sigma phase formation ly. A second, less direct example that
phase transformation. The observation was enhanced. The conclusion reached is diffusion is not responsible for the slug-
that it is the recrystallization that promot- the same as before —significant atomic gish nature of sigma formation may be
es sigma phase formation has been made displacement, but not necessarily long- found in the cold worked and aged
before (Refs. 4, 6, 9). ln other studies range diffusion, is a critical step in pro- structures. Sigma phase is found in the
(Refs. 5, 8), the possible relationship moting and accelerating the formation of recrystallized areas only, and not in the
between recrystallization and sigma sigma phase. cold-worked regions. However, diffusion
phase formation was not evaluated, but rates are expected to be significantly
Qualitatively, several features of the greater in cold-worked sections due to
such a relationship is strongly implied by
sigma phase structure indirectly support the high dislocation density. Therefore, if
the results. Finally, it was found by Singhal
the conclusions reached. First, the sigma diffusion were of primary importance,
and Martin (Ref. 11) that cold work alone,
phase structure involves a very large one would expect to find the sigma
without recrystallization, may in fact
tetragonal unit cell of 32 atoms, and it can phase in the cold-worked areas. In fact,
hinder the sigma phase transformation. It
be easily understood why formation of some evidence indicates that the chromi-
is suggested that the moving recrystalliza-
this complicated structure may be very um enrichment that occurs during sigma
tion front and the considerable atomic
slow. Secondly, the difficulty in forming formation actually proceeds faster than
motion at this front are instrumental in
the sigma structure is supported by the the chromium enrichment that takes
promoting sigma nucleus formation. As
common observation (Refs. 11, 27) that place in the ferrite as it attains metastable
shown in Fig. 5, sigma phase is found at
sigma grains contain numerous stacking
the recrystallization front, as well as with-
faults. This indicates that forming perfect
in the recrystallized area.
sigma crystals may be very difficult and,
The suggestion that considerable
hence, may be responsible for the slug-

n KEUEX
(a) I
l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l i III
! - e jfl
CO j
ll |
1 llll
§i
nl
v
a

ol i! lilllll! llll' 111 '


I
i III! M!i|lilll||||||ll|l
• ' I ' l l ' II L. N' li
I
tt 82 04 96 98
ENERGY(kev)
,-v
•1(0)^1 ilFel
~~W - 1
•TIL
GEM 1
i j j tail i
•'
H_ , ,,j. ;,, ,a,| .1
..N'illlijj

88 ' 92 '94 '96 88
Fig. 5 - Homogenized, cold-worked and aged Fig. 6 — Microstructure of homogenized Type
ENERGY(kev) (750°C/100 h) Type 308 stainless steel show- 308 stainless steel creep specimen tested at
Fig. 4-EDS spectra of A —ferrite and B- ing sigma formation only in recrystallized 650°C for 8500 h. A-unstressed shoulder
sigma in a sample aged 10,000 h at 650°C areas section; B — stressed gage section

WELDING RESEARCH SUPPLEMENT 1109-s


equilibrium. Whereas the ferrite compo- ly easy growth of sigma phase, once sigma phase transformation mechanism:
sition equals that of sigma phase after nucleated, proposed in this paper and the transformation is nucleation con-
aging 10,000 h at 650°C (1202°F), after also by others (Refs. 11, 31), implies that trolled, and subsequent growth of sigma
aging 500 h at 650° C the ferrite enrich- chromium is readily available during phase is relatively fast. The critical nature
ment is limited, attaining a composition of aging. The conclusion that competition of nucleation has been suggested before
64 Fe, 33 Cr, 3 Ni. On the other hand, for chromium plays a minor role is sup- (Refs. 9, 11, 17, 31); the new results
diffusion of chromium to form sigma ported by the observation that in some indicate that diffusion necessary for the
phase is faster in some areas, so that after cases the presence of M23Q carbide chromium enrichment found in sigma
aging only 100 h at 650°C (1202°F), the actually enhanced the transformation phase does not play a major rate-limiting
sigma phase that has formed has a com- rate of sigma (Ref. 14), and also by the role during nucleation. Rather, it is sug-
position of 62 Fe, 36 Cr, 2 Ni. As another observation that the amount of carbide gested that the structural requirements
example of the potential for fast chromi- remains constant as sigma phase forms for establishing sigma phase nuclei are of
um diffusion, the M23C.6 carbide that during the aging of Type 308 stainless primary importance. In agreement with
forms on aging homogenized Type 308 steel (Ref. 21). However, it should be this conclusion, it was observed that
stainless steel is even richer in chromium noted that on a very local scale, chromi- large-scale atomic movements, such as
than sigma phase —Fig. 2. The chromium um depletion of the matrix may hinder the advance of a recrystallization front,
diffusion to form M23C.6 must take place sigma formation, thus explaining the or deformation, significantly accelerate
through the austenite matrix, and yet this observation that sigma phase did not the sigma phase transformation. As a
is sufficiently fast to form nearly all the nucleate preferentially at chromium-rich consequence of this conclusion, the com-
carbide within 100 h of aging at 650° or M 2 3 C 6 carbides (Ref. 6). petition for major constituents of sigma,
750°C (1202° or 1382°F) (Ref. 22). In a The results of this study are likely to be particularly chromium, among various
duplex 7 + 5 steel, the formation of applicable to a wide range of alloys in phases in the steels is believed to play
M23Q is even faster. Thus, diffusion of which sigma phase is found. It is suggest- only a secondary role in the sigma phase
chromium in the austenite matrix is a ed that nucleation is the rate-controlling transformation.
potentially fast process. Either through step in most, if not all, sigma phase
direct or indirect evidence, it is apparent transformations. It is expected that com-
that although long-range diffusion is usu- positional changes that require less or A ckno wledgments
ally necessary to achieve the chromium more diffusion to achieve the sigma com- The authors would like to acknowl-
concentration required in sigma phase, position are not of first-order impor- edge the technical assistance of W . H.
this diffusion is not a rate-controlling step tance. Once sigma phase is thermody- Smith, K. F. Russell and R. VV. Reed in the
in the nucleation process and cannot namically stable, nucieation is the critical preparation and evaluation of specimens.
account for the sluggish nature of sigma feature. It is suggested that recrystalliza- The authors also wish to acknowledge
phase formation. tion and deformation promote nucleation the work of Judy Young in the prepara-
It has been shown that the transforma- by means of the large atomic movements tion of the manuscript. This research was
tion kinetics to sigma phase follow a involved. It is likely that ferrite in an sponsored by the Division of Materials
classic " C curve" behavior (Ref. 21). This austenite matrix accelerates sigma phase Sciences, U. S. Department of Energy,
is typically indicative of a nucleation con- formation by providing more sites for the under contract DE-AC05-840R21400
trolled reaction at temperatures above nucleation event. In addition, the shrink- with Martin Marietta Energy Systems,
the knee and a diffusion controlled reac- age of ferrite associated with its enrich- Inc.
tion at temperatures below the knee. ment during aging (Ref. 26) provides a
Such an interpretation is based on the moving interface, with concurrent large-
assumption that the free energy of for- scale atomic movements conducive to References
mation of the product phase increases sigma phase formation. The effect of 1. Weiss, B., and Stickler, R. 1972. Phase
with decreasing energy. However, in the elemental additions on promoting sigma instabilities during high-temperature exposure
case of sigma phase formation, this phase formation was not studied here. of 316 austenitic stainless steel. Metall. Trans.
assumption is not valid since sigma phase However, it is likely that additions such as 3(4):851-866.
is not the equilibrium phase below silicon may result in the formation of 2. Hall, E. O., and Algie, S. H. 1966. The
approximately 500°C (932°F) (Ref. 28). silicides which could act as preferred sigma phase. Metall. Rev. 11:61-88.
nucleation sites for sigma. Preferred 3. Bain, E. C, and Griffiths, W. E. 1927. An
Therefore, the C curve type transforma-
nucleation of sigma phase on epsilon introduction to the iron-chromium-nickel
tion behavior of sigma phase cannot be alloys. Trans. AIME 75:166-213.
interpreted as indicating diffusion-con- phase was found earlier (Ref. 17).
4. Lena, A. )., and Curry, W. E. 1955. The
trolled behavior at temperatures below effect of cold work and recrystallization on the
the knee of the curve. formation of the sigma phase in highly stable
Summary and Conclusions austenitic stainless steels. Trans. ASM 47:193-
In several earlier investigations (Refs.
13, 17, 29, 30), it was concluded that Several new results on the aging 210.
5. Dullis, E. )., and Smith, C. V. 1952. Effect
sigma phase formation is in direct compe- behavior of Types 308 and 308CRE stain-
of cold work on sigma formation. Metal
tition with carbide precipitation, since less steels have provided valuable insight Progress 62:86-87.
both are enriched in chromium when into understanding the mechanism by 6. Duhaj, P., Ivan, I., and Makovicky, E.
compared to the austenite matrix com- which sigma phase forms in these and 1968. Sigma phase precipitation in austenitic
position. It was suggested that the pres- other related alloys. A range of initial steels. / Iron Steel Inst. 206:1245-1251.
ence of carbide resulted in a chromium- conditions prior to aging was examined, 7. Nenno, S., Tagaya, M., Hosomi, K., and
depleted matrix which in turn inhibited including homogenized, homogenized Nishiyama, Z. 1963. Electron microscopy study
sigma formation. In the case where sigma and cold worked, and as-welded struc- of sigma phase precipitation in a Fe-Cr-Ni alloy.
did form, it was proposed that the car- tures. In addition, the effect of stress Trans. Jap. Inst. Met. 4:222-231.
bide dissolved during the transformation during aging was also briefly addressed. 8. Morley, ). I., and Kirkby, H. W. 1952.
Sigma phase embrittlement in 25 Cr-20 Ni
to sigma. However, it is concluded in this Structural examination and quantitative
heat-resisting steel. /. Iron Steel Inst. 172:129-
work that the "competition for chromi- compositional analyses using electron 142.
u m " is only of secondary importance, microscopy were used. All the results, as 9. Spruiell, |. E., Scott, ). A., Ary, C. S., and
and it does not play a critical role in well as observations reported in the liter- Hardin, R. L. 1973. Microstructural stability of
forming sigma phase. Rather, the relative- ature, present a consistent picture of the thermally-mechanically pretreated Type 316

110-S | APRIL 1986


austenitic stainless steel. Metall. Trans. 4:1533- Precipitation of the sigma phase in an austenitic S. A. 1983. Microstructural modification of
1544. steel. /. Iron Steel Inst. 205:953-958. austenitic stainless steels by rapid solidification.
10. Bindari, A. E„ Koh, P. K., and Zmeskal, 18. Shortsleeve, F. ]., and Nicholson, M. E. Metall. Trans. 14:1833-1841.
O. 1951. Sigma phase formation in a wrought 1951. Transformations in ferritic chromium 25. See for example Strickland-Constable,
heat-resisting steel. Trans. ASM 43:226-236. steels between 1100 and 1500°F (595 and R. F. 1968. Kinetics and Mechanism of Crystal-
11. Singhal, L K., and Martin, J. W. 1968. 815°C). Trans. ASM 43:142-160. lization, pp. 91-96, Academic Press, London,
The formation of ferrite and sigma phase in 19. Nicholson, M. E., Samans, C. H., and England.
some austenitic stainless steels. Acta Metall. Shortsleeve, F. |. 1952. Composition limits of 26. Vitek, |. M., and David, S. A. 1985.
16:1441-1451. sigma formation in nickel-chromium steels at Metastable equilibrium of ferrite in Type 308
12. Kirkby, H. W., and Morley, ). I. 1948. 1200°F (650°C). Trans. ASM 44:601-620. stainless steel. Scripta Metall. 19(1):23-26.
The formation of sigma phase in duplex Cr- 20. Hull, F. C. 1973. Effects of composition 27. Marcinkowski, M. J., and Miller, D. S.
Ni-Mo corrosion-resisting steels. / Iron Steel on embrittlement of austenitic stainless steels. 1962. A study of defect substructure in the
Inst. 158:289-294. Welding Journal 52(3):104-s to 113-s. Fe-Cr sigma phase by means of TEM. Phil.
13. Slattery, C. F., Keown, S. R., and Lam- 21. Vitek,). M„ and David, S. A. 1984. The Mag. 7:1025-1059.
bert, M. E. 1983. Influence of S-ferrite content solidification and aging behavior of Types 308 28. Metals Handbook. 1973. Vol. 8, Eighth
on transformation to intermetallic phases in and 308CRE stainless steel welds. Welding Edition, American Society for Metals, Metals
heat-treated Type 316 austenitic stainless steel Journal 63(8):246-s to 253-s. Park, Ohio.
weld metal. Met. Technol. 10:373-385. 22. Vitek, |. M., and David, S. A. The aging 29. White, W. E., and LeMay, I. 1970.
14. Barcik, ). 1983. The kinetics of sigma behavior of homogenized Type 308 and Metallographic observations on the formation
phase precipitation in AISI 310 and AISI 316 308CRE stainless steel. To be submitted for and occurrence of ferrite, sigma phase, and
steels. Metall. Trans. 14A:635-641. publication in the Welding Journal. carbides in austenitic stainless steels. I 310
15. lolly, P., and Hochmann, |. 1973. Evolu- 23. Stiegler, |. O., King, R. T., and Goodwin, stainless steel. Metall. 3:35-50.
tion structural d'un acier inoxydable austeno- G. M. 1975. Effect of residual elements on 30. White, W. E., and LeMay, I. 1970.
ferritique par maintien entre 600 et 1150°C. fracture characteristics and creep ductility of Metallographic observations on the formation
Mem. Sci. Rev. Met. 70:117-124. Type 308 stainless steel weld metal. /. Eng. and occurrence of ferrite, sigma phase, and
16. Beckitt, F. R. 1969. The formation of Mater. Technol. 97:245-250. carbides in austenitic stainless steels. II 316
sigma phase from 5-ferrite in a stainless steel. /. 24. Vitek, ). M „ DasGupta, A., and David, stainless steel. Metall. 3:51-60.
Iron Steel Inst. 207:632-638. 31. See discussion by J. J. Gilman at end of
17. Blenkinsop, P. A., and Nutting, J. 1967. Ref. 10.

WRC Bulletin 303


April 1985
Interpretive Report on Dynamic Analysis of Pressure Components—Third Edition
This third edition provides an update of WRC Bulletin 269, including: a summary of the development
programs that were completed subsequent to the second edition; an update of the reference list; an
expanded dynamic modeling section, which includes response for stochastic forces; and the inclusion of
a new section on fluid-structure interaction.
This report was prepared and sponsored for publication by the Subcommittee on Dynamic Analysis of
Pressure Components of the Design Division of the Pressure Vessel Research C o m m i t t e e of the Welding
Reseach Council.
The price of WRC Bulletin 303 is $14.00 per copy, plus $5.00 for postage and handling. Orders should
be sent with payment to the Welding Research Council, Rm. 1 3 0 1 , 345 E. 47 St., New York, NY
10017.

WRC Bulletin 305


June 1985
This bulletin contains three s u m m a r y reports prepared by the Japan Pressure Vessel Research Council
(JPVRC) Subcommittee on Hydrogen Embrittlement:
1) " H y d r o g e n Attack Limit of 2lA Cr-1 Mo S t e e l , " by Task Group I;
2) " E m b r i t t l e m e n t of Pressure Vessel Steels in High Temperature, High Pressure Hydrogen Environ-
m e n t , " by Task Group II; and
3) " H y d r o g e n Embrittlement of Bond Structure Between Stainless Steel Overlay and Base M e t a l , " by
Task Group III.
The three Task Group reports were translated and summarized for publication by JPVRC and have
been reviewed and edited by the U.S. PVRC Subcommittee on Hydrogen Effects for publication in this
bulletin.
The price of WRC Bulletin 3 0 5 is $14.00 per copy, plus $ 5 . 0 0 for postage and handling. Orders should
be sent with payment to the Welding Research Council, Rm. 1 3 0 1 , 345 E. 4 7 t h St., New York, NY
10017.

WELDING RESEARCH SUPPLEMENT! 111-s


AN INVITATION
TO
AUTHORS
Gentlemen:

The American Welding Society will hold its 68th Annual Convention and AWS Welding Show in Chicago,
Illinois, during March 22-27, 1987. One of the most important events of our 68th Annual Convention will be its
Professional Program.

It is indeed a pleasure to invite you as Authors to be participants in the Professional Program of our 68th
Annual Convention. On this occasion, the Society is offering an opportunity to Authors to bring the results of
outstanding work on their part to the attention of our entire membership, the welding industry, and the
nation's metalworking industries.

To this end, the Society's Technical Papers Committee will be happy to receive your application for
participation in our 68th Annual Convention Professional Program; the Committee is inviting 500-word
summaries for, basically, two categories of papers:

1. Applied Technology—unusual industrial or field applications of welding, new process or significant


equipment developments, surfacing, unique welding case histories, education, safety and health, cost
studies —also related topics such as nondestructive testing of weldments as well as maintenance and repair.

2. Research Oriented—results of significant laboratory research and/or development projects, welding


metallurgy, weldability studies, weld cracking or fracture, new test methods, arc physics — also related topics
such as fracture mechanics.

To apply for participation in our 68th Annual Convention Professional Program, please complete both sides of
the Author Application Form on the facing page. Also, please prepare a 500 to 1,000 word summary of what
you intend to say in your paper and mail it with the completed form to AWS.

The Technical Papers Committee will screen all Author applications and summaries (also the manuscripts of
completed papers if included), and we expect to notify Authors during late October or early November
concerning acceptance. Completed Author Application Forms and accompanying 500-word summaries must be
mailed by July 15, 1986, to ensure consideration for the 68th Annual Convention Professional Program.

Please note that, as it screens Author Applications and summaries, the Technical Papers Committee will be
looking for: (1) the newness of information and need for the information in its field, (2) technical accuracy, (3)
clarity of presentation, and (4) adaptability for oral presentation (a paper consisting basically of complicated
tables would not be suitable for oral presentation).

Sincerely yours,

Paul W. Ramsey ^ \
Executive Director

April 1, 1986

AMERICAN WELDING SOCIETY


P.O. Box 351040, Miami, Florida 33135

112-s I APRIL 1986


COMPLETE BOTH SIDES AND
AUTHOR APPLICATION FORM MAIL WITH 500-1000 WORD
SUMMARY TO:
-FOR-
68th Annual AWS Convention American Welding Society
P.O. Box 351040
Miami, Florida 33135
Chicago, Illinois, March 22-27,1987
Date Mailed
Author's Name Check how addressed: Mr. • Ms. •
Title or Position Dr. • Other
Company or Organization
Mailing Address
City State Zip Telephone: Area Number

If there are to be joint Name


authors, give name(s) Address
of other author(s) Name
Address
PROPOSED TITLE (10 words or less):

SUBJECT CLASSIFICATION:
Classify your paper by placing a check mark in the t w o appropriate boxes:
Applied Technology • Research Oriented • Other • / A n Original Contribution D A Review • Progress Report •

SUMMARY:
• Type, double spaced, a summary of not less than 500 — but preferably not more than 1000 — words and attach to this
form.
• Be sure to give sufficient information to enable the Technical Papers Committee to obtain a clear idea of content of the
proposed paper; confine background to about 100 words. Also be sure to emphasize results and conclusions, since this
material, together with information on what is new, will have a very important bearing on the decision of the Technical
Papers Committee.
• If complete manuscript is available, in addition to summary, please attach t w o copies of this form.
• Application Form and summary must be postmarked not later than July 15, 1986, to ensure consideration for inclusion on
the 68th Annual AWS Convention Professional Program.

MANUSCRIPT DEADLINES:
• All manuscripts shouldbe in the hands of the Technical Papers Committee not later than March 1, 1987. If received prior to
December 1, 1986, every effort will be made to publish them in advance of meeting.
• It is expected that the Committee's selections will be announced sometime in October 1986.
• If your paper is made a part of the program, which of the following manuscript deadlines will you be able to meet?
December 1, 1986 D lanuary 3 1 , 1987 • March 1, 1987 D

PRESENTATION A N D PUBLICATION O F PAPERS:


• Has material in this paper been previously presented in meeting or published?
YesD NoD When?
Where?
• Following presentation at the 68th Annual AWS Convention, would you accept invitations to present this paper before
AWS Sections ? Yes • No D

• Papers accepted for presentation become the property of the Society with original publication rights assigned to the
Welding Journal.

RETURN TO AWS HEADQUARTERS. MUSTBEPOSTMARKEDHOT


LATER THAN JULY 15,1986, TO ENSURE CONSIDERA TION.

Author's Signature
Author(s) of Proposed Paper:
SUMMARY CODE
(For AWS Headquarters Use Only)

Title of Paper (may be abbreviated)

TO AUTHOR(S): Please briefly answer questions in spaces provided below—also


please note that answers given below are required in addition to 500
to 1,000 word Summary. Please use typewriter.

(1) WHY WAS THE WORK DONE?

(2) WHAT WAS DONE?

(3) WHAT WAS FOUND?

(4) WHAT ARE YOUR MOST IMPORTANT CONCLUSIONS?

(5) TO W H O M DO YOU THINK YOUR PAPER WILL BE IMPORTANT? HOW?

OTHER COMMENT (Optional)

RETURN TO A WS HEADQUARTERS. MUST BE POSTMARKED NOTBe sure to attach 500-1,000 word Summary when
LATER THAN JULY 15, 1986, TO ENSURE CONSIDERATION. mailing completed Author's Application Form to AWS
Headquarters.

You might also like