East Imi Post Drive Test Report.

GSM, UMTS AND DL Throughput Data Radio Network Optimization

This Post DT Report Has Prepared By: Mustafe Mahamoud Abdilahi.

Analysis Date Feb, 2022

1 ENG-RAN-Wireless Optimization (EER)

 Drive Test Protocol
Test Type GSM, UMTS AND DL Throughput Data Radio Network Optimization
Drive test date Feb, 2022
Drive Test Duration 1hours
Measurement tool Nemo handy
Analysis tool Actix Software
UE Type

Scope:

Test Type Test case Target

CSSR >=98%

CDR <=2%
Throughput Data
UMTS Short Call Coverage : RSCP >-95dBm >95%
GSM Short Call

Coverage : EcNo < -13dBm >98%

2 ENG-RAN-Wireless Optimization (EER)

CONTENTS

1 Introduction

2 Cs N Ps Statistics Performance

3 Drive Test Result & Analysis

4 Conclusion & Recommendation

3 ENG-RAN-Wireless Optimization (EER)

Executive Summary:
 The report shows pre And Post DT analysis for East Imi town.
 Highlights the optimization gap between Pre and Post Drive Test Along With The basic KPIs Parameters.
 It is one part of regional optimization action plan to optimize Both Voice And Data mobile network coverage and quality.

Objective Of the Report:

 Measuring and assessing the coverage and quality of service of a wireless radio network
 To improve the existing network Quality and capacity
 To improve the offered service quality for fulfillment of customer demand.
 To maintain the KPIs under pre-defined threshold.
 To effectively reuse the available bandwidth and frequency carries in order to avoid internal interference and
service degradation.

4 ENG-RAN-Wireless Optimization (EER)

Over view:

Number of Sites
GSM 1
WCDMA 1
LTE -

5 ENG-RAN-Wireless Optimization (EER)

 This report shows a basic summary for the drive route.
CS Domain
Metric Target Pass/Fail Value
Overall Call Success Rate (End to End) 95% -
Dropped Rate 2.5% -
Call Setup Duration (secs) 8 -

Metric Target Pass/Fail Value

Good EcIo - Good RSCP 90% Pass 99.4%
95% Percentile of EcIo -15 Pass -11.5
95% Percentile of RSCP -95 Pass -73
Single Server percentage 80% Pass 82.9%
Pilot Pollution (Location) 5% Pass 0.0%

CS Call Analysis PS Call Analysis

0.0% 0.0%

100.0%

Call Setup Successful Call Setup Failure Session Successful Session Setup Failure

6 ENG-RAN-Wireless Optimization (EER)

HSPA Call Overview

HSPA call volumes

Number of HSPA call setup attempts 1 call

Number of HSPA call setup failures 0 call
Number of HSPA call drops 0 call

Metric Target Value Pass/Fail

HSPA Call Setup Failure Rate 5% 0.0% PASS

Av. HSPA Call Setup Duration (msec) 8000 1912 PASS
PS Call Drop Rate in HSPA 5% 0.0% PASS
PS Call Drop Rate in R99 3% 0.0% PASS
Overall PS Call Setup Failure Rate 3% No HSDPA calls -

Throughput Overview
Target Value
Metric Pass/Fail
(kbit/sec) (kbit/sec)
Mean Raw DL HSPA Throughput 600 2645.71 PASS
Mean DL Application Throughput (TCP) 500 no TCP data -

Radio Performance Overview

Value
Metric Target Pass/Fail
(dB)

95% Percentile of EcIo -15 -12.0 PASS

95% Percentile of RSCP -95 -73 PASS
95% Percentile of CQI 10 18 PASS

Additional Throughput Related information HSDPA HSUPA

Average scheduling activity registered 31.66% 52.12%

Mean Raw HSPA Throughput (kbit/sec) 2645.71 83.53

Max Raw HSPA Throughput (kbit/sec) 11514.73 444.51

Mean Net HSPA Throughput (kbit/sec) 2070.94 81.13

RRC Layer
Metric Value
RRC Connection Establishment 100.0%
RadioBearer Setup 100.0%
RadioBearer Reconfiguration 100.0%
ActiveSet Update 100%
7 ENG-RAN-Wireless Optimization (EER)
Cell Update 100%
This report shows the call statistics. Please, note that the drop call rate is based on Successfully Calls Only.
CS CALL STATISTICS PERFORMANCE BEFORE
Call Statistics Value Failure / Connected Rates

Total Number of Calls 15

Successful Incoming 0 0%

Calls
Access Failure Rate

Successful Outgoing 15 100%

Connected Rate

Calls
Total Successful Calls 15
Call Failures - Incoming 0 Connected Calls
Drop / Success Rates

Call Failures - Outgoing 0

Total Access Failures 0 0%

Total Drops 0
Drop Rate
Total Completed calls 14 100% Success Rate

Access Failure Rate 0.0%

Drop Rate 0%
Success Rate 100% - Drop Call Rate vs Completed Call Rate for
successful incoming or outgoing calls only.
8 ENG-RAN-Wireless Optimization (EER)
 Problem Analysis

Problem Found.
 Poor/Bad Quality Network.
 Poor Throughput Data.
 Overshooting.

Cause Analysis. Action proposed

 Due to lack of Antenna orientation.  Adjusting Antenna Tilting.
 Checking Resource with Engineering
Team.

Actions Has Been Taken.

 Mechanical Tilt For 2 cell

 Electrical Tilt For 3 cell
 Parameter optimization For cell 5 cell
9
 East Imi 3G Coverage(RSCP)

Drive test result shows that East Imi Town UMTS Coverage is Very Good And Within The Threshold.
When we implemented for site 151592 sector 1, 2 & 3. and finally This Shows 0% of Bad While 100% Is
Good10Which Means it is an excellent since it is above the threshold.
ENG-RAN-Wireless Optimization (EER)
 East Imi Gsm Quality(Rx_Qual)

After We Implemented for site 151592 sector 1, 2 & 3 and 151263 Sector 2 the Result Shows 0.3% Is Bad While 99.7% Is
Good
11 Which Means there is an Excellent improvement
ENG-RAN-Wireless Optimization (EER)of East imi town Quality Network.
 Ue_TxPow(dBm) Before Ue_TxPow(dBm) After

In generally as you can see from above result shows 99.8%

Very good but the bad part UE_TxPow(dBm) correlated with After We Have Done An Implementation and We Brought 100%
coverage , quality and overshooting cells. Improvement As You See In the above diagram.
Lastly as a solution we should optimize the mention problem
12
 APP THROUGHPUT DL (KBPS) BEFORE APP THROUGHPUT DL (KBPS) AFTER

 The Overall DL Throughput of East Imi Town Shows us Bad

Result The Overall DL Throughput Of East Imi Town shows us an
 As You Can See From The Above Chart >=1024kbps is 4.8% improvement As You Can See From The Above Chart
 While >=384kbps is 20.4% >=1024kbps 65.9% While >=384kbps is 3.8% and The Bad
 and The Bad Part Is 55.1% That Means < 384kbps. Part Is 3.1% That Means < 384kbps. Compering to the
 As Solution We Should Improve The Whole Bad Area by
previous one there is an improvement of 52.1%
Doing
13 an Optimization Activities.
APP THROUGHPUT DL (KBPS) BEFORE APP THROUGHPUT DL (KBPS) AFTER

Problem Found For This Area. ENG-RAN-Wireless Optimization (EER)

Solution for improvement in this Area.
 Lake of Antenna Orientation serving due to up
 Parameter Correction for site 151592_1
tilting for site 151592_1
 Avoiding overshooting cells
14  Overshooting cells from far distance
APP THROUGHPUT DL (KBPS) BEFORE APP THROUGHPUT DL (KBPS) AFTER

Problem Found. Solution Of The Problem.

 Near site is not a dominant serving cell.  By antenna adjustment for site id 151592_2.
 Overshooting cells for far distance.  Parameter correction.
 and this situation affects coverage and quality.  Avoiding overshooting cell 151592_2.
15
 CONCLUSION & RECOMMENDATION

Conclusion.
 In generally there is great improvement Of East Imi Town Both Coverage and DL Throughput Data after
optimization activities has been done.

Recommendation.
 Regular DT Measurement and analysis will improve coverage performance and customer experience to the
network.

16 ENG-RAN-Wireless Optimization (EER)

 THANK YOU!

17 ENG-RAN-Wireless Optimization (EER)