Security Level:

UMTS Performance KPI And Resource Capacity Training

www.huawei.com

HUAWEI
HUAWEITECHNOLOGIES
TECHNOLOGIESCO.,
CO.,LTD.
LTD. Huawei Confidential
  Introduction
 Related Tools
 Performance KPI Audit
 Resource and Capacity Audit

HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES Co., Ltd. HUAWEI Confidential Page 2

UMTS Network Assessment Process
• Performance And Resource Assessment Based OMSTAR & GENEXspace

Operational Data Word&Excel

Processes
Prepare
acquisition Report
Analysis Opportunities

Parameter configuration, multi-carrier

Network configuration checks configuration, as well as the license
configuration check

Radio resources, CE, and the RNC

Network resource & capacity check
hardware utilization check
hardware check
Content

Transmission resource assessment Iub, Iu-CS, Iu-PS, Iur port

utilization check;

The whole network KPI

Network performance assessment performance checks and
analysis

HISILICONTECHNOLOGIES
HUAWEI SEMICONDUCTOR
CO., LTD. Page 3
Report Overview
Frequency point, the various NodeB CE HSDPA yards,, RNC
Network overview
plate configuration, and other information, multi-carrier
strategy, LAC, for the first-line examination

Traffic Model RNC various traffic distribution, as well as single-

user traffic model
Access, mobility, service can be maintained, and
Performance KPI throughput. This chapter is to judge the performance of
the existing network, and analysis of the existing
network KPI issues

Including wireless air interface resources, public

Resource and Capacity channel, CE, the RNC resources, transmission
resources in five areas assessment is the most
important sections of the stock sales

The destination is predicted, the power resources

Target network Forecast
through the input traffic growth forecasts, the output air
interface, a common channel, NodeB, RNC resources,
and the transmission resource forecast.

HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD. Huawei Confidential Page 4

Performance KPI Audit

Performance KPI Audit

Accessibility Mobility Retainability Integration

• RRC Setup Success • SHO Factor. • AMR Call Drop Rate • Cell HSDPA
Rate. • SHO Success Rate. • VP Call Drop Rate Throughput
• RAB Setup Success • HHO Success Rate • HSDPA Call Drop • RNC HSDPA User
Rate. • ……. Rate Throughput
• AMR RAB Setup • ……. • ……. • ……..
Success Rate. • ……. • ……..
• ……..
• ……..

HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES Co., Ltd. HUAWEI Confidential Page 5

RRC Setup Success Rate
Audit Threshold :
RRC setup success rate > 98% Good
98% > RRC setup success rate > 95% Normal
RRC setup success rate < 95% Bad
RRC Setup Success Rate Trend(RNC151) RRC Attempted Times Scenario(RNC151)
12000000 99.90%
99.85%
10000000 99.80%
4% 8%
99.75%
RRC Attempt Times

RRC Success Rate

8000000 6%
99.70%
99.65% RRC.AttConnEstab.IRATCelRes
6000000
99.60% 33% RRC.AttConnEstab.Reg
99.55%
4000000 RRC.AttConnEstab.Tm
99.50%
99.45% RRC.AttConnEstab.Org
2000000
99.40% RRC.AttConnEstab.other
0 99.35% 49%
2011-11-19

2011-11-20

2011-11-21

2011-11-22

2011-11-23

2011-11-24

2011-11-25

VS.RRC.AttConnEstab.Cell VS.RRC.SuccConnEstab.Cell.Rate

Figure1 Figure2
• Figure1 Statistics of an operator in the next week day, the RRC access success rate and attempts distribution, wherein
yellow polyline is a day, seven days a week and the RRC access success rate, blue bars indicate the seven days per a week
days RRC attempts.
• Figure2 RRC number of times for various reasons, the value of (different systems re-election / registration / calling / called /
other) statistics, the statistical time period of one week .
HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD. Huawei Confidential Page 6
RRC Setup Success Rate
RRC Setup Success Rate Scenario(RNC151)
默认评估标准：
100.00%
TopN Cells RRC Attempt Fail Analysis(RNC151)
Process RRC Conn Req Rate for Diff

200000.00
RRC /RAB setup success rate > 98% Good

RRC Connection Fail Times

99.80% 180000.00
160000.00
98% > RRC/RAB setup success rate > 95%
99.60% Normal 140000.00
120000.00
RRC/RAB
99.40%
setup success rate < 95% Bad 100000.00
Causes

99.20% 80000.00
99.00% 60000.00
40000.00
98.80% 20000.00
0.00
98.60% 151
151

RRC.SuccRate.IRATCelRes RRC.SuccRate.Reg RRC.SuccRate.Org Total RRC Attempt Fail Times of TopN Cells
RRC.SuccRate.Tm RRC.SuccRate.Other Total RRC Attempt Fail Times of All Cells

Figure3 Figure4
• Figure3 RRC establishment success rate statistics for various reasons, the value of (different systems re-election /
registration / calling / called / other).
• Figure4 Statistics to establish the number of failed RRC TOPN district and the total number of RRC try the contrast .
VS.R
VS.R VS.R VS.R VS.R VS.
RC.S VS.R VS.R VS.RR
RRC.S RC.At RC.R RC.R VS.RR RC.R VS.R RR
Oper uccC Cell.RR RC.R RC.R C.Rej.D
RNCI CellI uccCo tCon ej.UL ej.DL C.Rej.C ej.ULI RC.R C.R RRC.FailConnEstab.NoR
ator onnE C.Att.F ej.UL. ej.DL LIUBB
D D nnEsta nEsta Powe Powe ode.Co UBBa ej.RL. ej.T eply
Name stab. ail CE.C CE.C and.Co
b.sum b.Su r.Con r.Con ng nd.C Fail NL.
Cell. ong ong ng
m g g ong Fail
Rate
1333 89.21 1272
71 XXX 11356 1373 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1373
3 % 9
94.83
71 681 XXX 7576 7989 413 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 413
%

• The Top district of RRC and failed general situation

HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD. Huawei Confidential Page 7

RRC Setup Success Rate
Suggestion For Optimizing Opportunities

HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD. Huawei Confidential Page 8

AMR RAB Setup Success Rate
Audit Threshold :
AMR RAB Setup Success Rate > 98% Good
98% > AMR RAB Setup Success Rate> 95% Normal
AMR RAB Setup Success Rate < 95% Bad
VS.R VS.R VS.R
VS.R VS.R VS.R
AMR RAB Setup Success Rate Trend(RNC151) AB. VS.R VS.R VS.R VS.R VS.R AB.F AB.F VS.R
AB. AB.F VS.R VS.R VS.R AB.F
400000 99.85% Suc AB. AB.F AB.F AB.F AB.F ailEs ailEs VS.R AB.F
Oper Suc ailEs AB.F AB.F AB.F ailEs
350000 cEst AttE ailEs ailEs ailEs ailEs tab. tab. AB.F ailEs
99.84%
RNC CellI ator cEst tabC ailEs ailEs ailEs tabC

AMR RAB Success Est Rate

AMR RAB Req to Est Times

300000 abC stab tCs. tCs. tCs. tCs. CS. CS. ailEs tabC
99.83% ID D Nam abC S.A tabC tCS. tabC S.ot
250000 S.A CS. Pow Cod ULC DLC ULIU DLIU tCS. S.Un
e S.A MR. S.Co RIPF S.TN her.
200000 99.82% MR. AMR er.C e.Co E.Co E.Co BBa BBa Relo sp.O
MR. 12.2. ng ail L CEL
150000 Cell. .12.2 ong ng ng ng nd.C nd.C ther
99.81% 12.2 Cell L
100000 Rate ong ong
99.80%
50000 1099 85.3
151 XXX 840 717 123 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 123
0 99.79% 6 6%
2011-11-19

2011-11-20

2011-11-21

2011-11-22

2011-11-23

2011-11-24

2011-11-25

1099 89.1
151 XXX 545 486 59 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 58
5 7%
VS.RAB.AttEstabCS.AMR.12.2 VS.RAB.SuccEstabCS.AMR.RNC.Rate 1099 89.0
151 XXX 200 178 22 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22
4 0%
Figure1 Figure2
• Figure1 Establish the number showing the scope of the evaluation time (usually one week) in days, daily AMR RAB try
to establish the success rate and AMR
• Figure2 Number of failures emerged AMR RAB TOP district, can be seen from the table: the reason for the failure of
each cell. The reason for the failure is divided into: (focus on indicators marked in red)

HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD. Huawei Confidential Page 9

AMR RAB Setup Success Rate
Suggestion For Optimizing Opportunities

HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD. Huawei Confidential Page 10

PS RAB Setup Success Rate
Audit Threshold :
PS RAB Setup Success Rate > 98% Good
98% > PS RAB Setup Success Rate> 95% Normal
PS RAB Setup Success Rate < 95% Bad
PS RAB Setup Success Rate Trend(RNC151)
10000000 99.90%
9000000
99.80%
8000000
PS RAB Req to Est Times

PS RAB Setup Est Rate

7000000
99.70%
6000000
5000000 99.60%
4000000
99.50%
3000000
2000000
99.40%
1000000
0 99.30%
2011-11-19

2011-11-20

2011-11-21

2011-11-22

2011-11-23

2011-11-24

2011-11-25

VS.RAB.AttEstabPS.Cell VS.RAB.SuccEstabPS.RNC.Rate

Figure1 Figure2
• Figure1shows the PS RAB setup success rate and PS RAB setup attempts per day within the evaluation period (usually a
week)
• Figure2 Showing the the PS RAB establishment of a number of failures TOP district: each cell of the main causes of
failure can be seen from the table.

HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD. Huawei Confidential Page 11

PS RAB Setup Success Rate
Suggestion For Optimizing Opportunities

HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD. Huawei Confidential Page 12

SHO Factor
Audit Threshold :
Normal soft handover consumption ratio (SHO Factor Usage) should be maintained between 30% to 40%

SHO Factor State Usage(RNC13)

80.00%
• Embodied in the figure of the evaluation period the proportion of soft
70.00%
handover (SHO Factor State) and soft-switching consumption ratio (SHO
60.00%
Factor Usage), generally soft handover consumption ratio as network
50.00%
performance indicators to measure the content. The normal soft
Rate(％)

40.00%
handover consumption ratio (SHO Factor Usage) should be maintained
30.00%
between 30% to 40%. If the ratio is too high, it will take up too much
20.00%
system resources because soft handover, lead to a decline in system
10.00%
capacity and network performance decline; If the ratio is too low, there
0.00%
13 is no use of the macro classification gain of soft handover, call drop will
SHO Factor State SHO Factor Usage
increase the chance , a poor user experience.

HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD. Huawei Confidential Page 13

SHO Factor
Suggestion For Optimizing Opportunities

HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD. Huawei Confidential Page 14

SHO Success Rate
Audit Threshold :
SHO Success Rate > 99% Good
SHO Success Rate <99% Bad

SHO Success Rate Trend(RNC13)

60000000 99.95%

SHO.FailRLA
SHO.FailRLA
ddUESide.Isr
SHO.FailRLA

SHO.FailRLA
ddUESide.Cf
VS.SHO.Fail.

VS.SHO.Fail.
ddUESide.In
SHO.Succ.R

ddUESide.N
SHO.Att.RL.

Other.Cell
L.UE.Side
Operator

Success

gUnsup
oReply
RNCID
50000000

CellID

Name
Soft Handover Success Rate

vCfg
SHO

Rate
Soft Handover Req Times

Cell
UE
40000000 99.94%

30000000

20000000 99.93%
13 23394 XXX 98.92% 58548 57916 632 2 0 221 0 409
10000000

0 99.92% 13 23391 XXX 98.92% 57097 56481 616 0 0 247 0 369

2011-08-31

2011-09-01

2011-09-02

2011-09-03

2011-09-04

2011-09-05

2011-09-06

2011-09-07

SHO Attempt Times SHO Success Rate

• The figure above indicates that the RNC level evaluation cycle trend diagram of the overall soft handover success rate;
represented in the table on the evaluation cycle CELL soft handover success rate of less than 99% of the cell list. If soft
handover success rate is higher than 99%, that soft handover success rate is very good. Otherwise, if reunification,
PCHR data to analyze the reasons for failure to enhance the soft handover success rate

HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD. Huawei Confidential Page 15

SHO Success Rate
Suggestion For Optimizing Opportunities

HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD. Huawei Confidential Page 16

HHO Success Rate
Audit Threshold :
HHO Success Rate > 99% Good
HHO Success Rate <99% Bad

Inter-Freq HHO Success Rate Trend(RNC13)

60000 99.30% Inter- VS.H VS.HH VS.HH VS.HH VS.HH
Ope VS.H VS.H VS.HH VS.HH
99.25% Freq HO.S O.Inter O.Inte O.Inte O.Inte
rato HO.A HO.In O.Inter O.Inter

Inter-Freq HHO Success Rate

50000
RNCI Cel HHO uccIn FreqO rFreq rFreq rFreq
Inter-Freq HHO Req Times

99.20%
r ttInte terFr FreqO FreqO
99.15% D lID Succ terFr ut.Cfg Out.F Out.C Out.N
40000 Na rFre eq.Fa ut.Pyh ut.CfgI
99.10% ess eqOu Unsup ailUS ellUpd oRepl
me qOut ilOut ChFail nvalid
30000 99.05% Rate t p R t y
99.00% 58
20000 62.96
98.95% 13 55 XXX 135 85 50 0 45 0 0 0 4
%
10000
98.90% 2
98.85% 58
63.39
0 98.80% 13 55 XXX 112 71 41 0 38 0 0 0 3
%
2011-08-31

2011-09-01

2011-09-02

2011-09-03

2011-09-04

2011-09-05

2011-09-06

2011-09-07

Inter-Freq HHO Attempt Times Inter-Freq HHO Success Rate

• Represented in the figure is the RNC-level assessment cycle whole different frequency hard handover success rate trends Figure ；
• CELL level assessment cycle different frequency hard handover success rate of less than 85% of the cell list is indicated in the
table. If the the different frequency hard handover success rate is higher than 98%, that different frequency hard handover
success rate is very good. Otherwise need if reunification, PCHR data more in-depth analysis of the causes of the failure, enhance
different frequency hard handover success rate.

HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD. Huawei Confidential Page 17

HHO Success Rate
Suggestion For Optimizing Opportunities

HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD. Huawei Confidential Page 18

CS Inter-RAT HO Success Rate
Audit Threshold :
CS Inter-RAT HO Success Rate > 85% Good
CS Inter-RAT HO Success Rate <85% Bad

CS Inter-RAT HO Execute Success Rate Trend(RNC1122)

12000 98.50%

98.00% VS.IR

CS Inter-RAT HO Success Rate

10000
IRATH IRATH VS.IR
ATHO. IRATH VS.IR
CS Inter-RAT HO Times

97.50% Operat IRATH O.Fail O.Fail ATHO.

8000 SuccC O.Suc ATHO.
97.00%
RNCID CellID or O.AttO OutCS OutCS FailOu
SOut. cOutC FailOu
6000 Name utCS .CfgU .PhyC tCS.Ot
96.50% RNC.R S tCS
nsupp hFail her
4000 ate
96.00%
84.62
1121 36286 XXX 1352 1144 208 2 203 3
2000 95.50% %
81.32
0 95.00% 1121 36122 XXX 878 714 164 0 156 8
%
2011-10-07

2011-10-08

2011-10-09

2011-10-10

2011-10-11

2011-10-12

2011-10-13

VS.IRATHO.AttOutCS.RNC CS IRATHO OUT SuccRate

• Represented in the figure is the RNC level overall CS disparate systems evaluation cycle switch success rate trend graph.
CS disparate systems handover success rate is higher than 95%, CS disparate systems that switch the success rate is
very good.

HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD. Huawei Confidential Page 19

CS Inter-RAT HO Success Rate
Suggestion For Optimizing Opportunities

HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD. Huawei Confidential Page 20

PS Inter-RAT HO Success Rate
Audit Threshold :
PS Inter-RAT HO Success Rate > 90% Good
PS Inter-RAT HO Success Rate <90% Bad

PS Inter-RAT HO Success Rate Trend(RNC1122)

3500 90.00%
89.00%
3000
88.00%
PS Inter-RAT HO Times

PS HO Success Times
2500 87.00%
86.00%
2000
85.00%
1500
84.00%

1000 83.00%
82.00%
500
81.00%
0 80.00%
2011-10-07

2011-10-08

2011-10-09

2011-10-10

2011-10-11

2011-10-12

2011-10-13

IRATHO.AttOutPSUTRAN IRATHO.SuccOutPSUTRAN.Rate

• Represented in the figure is the RNC level of overall PS disparate systems evaluation cycle switch success rate trend
graph. PS disparate systems handover success rate is higher than 90%, and that different system to switch the success
rate is very good. Otherwise need to analyze the reasons for failure, if reunification, PCHR data to enhance PS disparate
systems handover success rate

HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD. Huawei Confidential Page 21

PS Inter-RAT HO Success Rate
Suggestion For Optimizing Opportunities

HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD. Huawei Confidential Page 22

AMR Call Drop Rate
Audit Threshold : AMR Call Drop Rate<1.5% Good

AMR Call Drop Rate Trend(RNC13)

VS.R
800000 1.20% VS.R
AM VS.R AB.
VS.R VS.RA VS.RA VS.R AB.
700000
1.00%
R VS.R VS.R AB.A Abn
AB.L VS.RA B.Abno B.Abno AB.A Abn
AMR RAB Est Success Times

600000 Oper Call AB.A AB.A bnor orm

RNC Cell oss.C B.Abno rmRel. rmRel. bnor orm

AMR Call Drop Rate

0.80% ator Dro bnor bnor mRel. Rel.
500000 ID ID S.AM rmRel. CS.RF. CS.RF. mRel. Rel.
Name p mRel. mRel. CS.RF CS.U
R.AL CS.RF ULSyn SRBRe CS.O CS.P
400000 0.60% Rat AMR CS .UuNo TRA
L c set M ree
e Reply Nge
300000 mpt
0.40% n
200000
2.27
0.20% 71 10163 XXX 6001 136 136 136 2 91 43 0 0 0
100000 %

0 0.00% 1.62
2011-08-31

2011-09-01

2011-09-02

2011-09-03

2011-09-04

2011-09-05

2011-09-06

2011-09-07
71 3072 XXX 4520 73 73 73 3 29 41 0 0 0
%

2.36
71 7263 XXX 4372 103 103 103 1 55 47 0 0 0
%
VS.RAB.SuccEstabCS.AMR.12.2 AMR Call Drop Rate

• AMR dropped call rate (AMR Call Drop Rate), the statistical time point dropped calls indicators
• The RNC dropped call rate indicators TOP the district impact and cell reasons for dropped calls distribution exists

HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD. Huawei Confidential Page 23

AMR Call Drop Rate
Suggestion For Optimizing Opportunities

HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD. Huawei Confidential Page 24

PS Call Drop Rate
Audit Threshold : PS Call Drop Rate<5% Good

PS Call Drop Rate Trend(RNC13)

12000000 1.60%
VS. VS.
1.40% VS.R VS.R RAB VS.R RAB VS.
10000000 PS VS. VS.R VS.R VS.
1.20% VS.R VS.R AB.A AB.A .Abn AB.A .Abn RAB
VS.RAB.SuccEstabPS

Call RAB AB.A AB.A Call.

Opera AB.L AB.A bnor bnor orm bnor orm .Abn

PS Call Drop Rate

8000000 RNCI CellI Dro .Abn bnor bnor Dro
1.00% tor oss.P bnor mRel. mRel. Rel. mRel. Rel. orm
D D p orm mRel. mRel. p.PS
6000000 0.80% Name S.AL mRel. PS.RF PS.RF PS. PS.RF PS. Rel.
Rat Rel. PS.O PS.Pr .Oth
L PS.RF .ULSy .UuNo RF.S .TRB GTP PS.
0.60% e PS M eempt er
4000000 nc Reply RBR Reset ULo OLC
0.40% eset ss
2000000 117 5.5 3249
0.20% 71 XXX 1797 1710 110 364 646 509 0 0 21 0 66
3 3% 8
0 0.00% 111 8.2 1102
71 XXX 906 803 181 114 89 255 0 0 30 0 73
2011-08-31

2011-09-01

2011-09-02

2011-09-03

2011-09-04

2011-09-05

2011-09-06

2011-09-07

31 2% 7

VS.RAB.SuccEstabPS PS Call Drop Rate

• PS dropped calls and the corresponding relations of the traffic, under normal circumstances, PS traffic higher rate of
dropped calls is relatively poor. In the case of complete the RNC microphone information, the PS traffic from the PS call
drop rate trend and the other day out of proportion to the scene, you need to focus on analysis.

• The RNC dropped call rate indicators TOP the district impact and cell reasons for dropped calls distribution exists

HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD. Huawei Confidential Page 25

PS Call Drop Rate
Suggestion For Optimizing Opportunities

HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD. Huawei Confidential Page 26

Resource and Capacity Audit

Resource and Capacity Audit

Radio Resource Audit Common Channel Audit RNC Resource Audit Transmission Resource Audit

• TCP Utility Ratio. • PCH Utility Ratio. • SPU Load • IU-CS Signaling Plane
• RTWP Status. • RACH & FACH • DPU Load (ATM)
• Code Utility Ratio. Utility Ratio. • RNC License Utility • IU-PS Signaling Plane
• HHO Success Rate • …….. (ATM)
• …….. • IUR Signaling Plane
(ATM)
• ……..
• ………

HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD. Huawei Confidential Page 27

TCP Utility Ratio
1 Single-
user
HSDPA Several HSDPA Several HSDPA Several
pass pass pass 1 2 3 1 2 3 Multi-
90 user
% HSDP T
75 A
%
R99 TCP: Total carrier power

20
% CCH

1.HSDPA no power control, as long as the HSDPA several transmission, carrier power will often reach 90% of
the target load can not use the total power rating carrier power utilization.

2.HSDPA decline in the throughput of each user, the congestion is not obvious.

HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD. Huawei Confidential Page 28

TCP Utility Ratio
Audit Threshold : NonHS TCP Utility Ratio≥ 70％

RA RA
NonHS TCP Utility Ratio Distribution(RNC2305) B B
Con
700 Fail Fail
figu RRC
600 Ope Est Est
Cell Number

R C red NonHS Total VS.RR VS.RAB.Fa VS.RAB. Rej

500 rato PCPICH Cs Ps
N el PA TCP TCP C.Rej.D ilEstabCS. FailEstab Powe
400 r POWER Po Po
CI lI Cap Utility Utility LPower DLPower.C PS.DLPo r
300 Na (W) wer wer
200
D D acit Ratio Ratio .Cong ong wer.Cong Cong
me Co Co
100 y Rate
ng ng
0 (W)
Rat Rat
0% 15% 30% 45% 60% 75% 90%
e e
Utility Ratio (%) 4 60.
19.9 0.50 0.0
11 4 XXX 2.00 79.94% 90.07% 19 189 1 77
5 % 4%
Cell Number 8 %
4 60.
19.9 9.32 0.2
Figure 1 11 9 XXX
5
2.00 76.74% 88.25% 369 189 3
%
00
0%
5 %
Total TCP Utility Ratio Distribution(RNC2305)
100 • Downlink empty port quasi entry limit for AMR non-HS
power exceeds 70%, to 75% in non-AMR; an RRC quasi
Cell Number

80
60 entry limit for cell maximum downlink load door limit,
40
default 90%; exceeds the threshold, will cause RRC and RAB
20
0
reject failure, KPIs deterioration ；
0% 15% 30% 45% 60% 75% 90% • While non-H can seize power cell, for R99 high power
Utility Ratio (%)
(greater than 70% utilization), and total power cell H users
Cell Number feel the need to focus on (H single-user rate of less than
Figure 2 300Kbps).

HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD. Huawei Confidential Page 29

TCP Utility Ratio
Suggestion For Optimizing Opportunities

HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD. Huawei Confidential Page 30

RTWP Status
Audit Threshold : RTWP Status：MeanRTWP≥ -100dBm

Mean RTWP Distribution(RNC11)

450
400
350
Cell Number

300
250
200
150
100
50
0
-115 -105 -95 -85 -75 -65 -55
MeanRTWP Distribution(dB)

Cell Number(Busy) Cell Number(Free)

• The distribution of average RTWP cell output busy

• Busy and leisure time average RTWP than-100dBm cell information

HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD. Huawei Confidential Page 31

RTWP Status
Suggestion For Optimizing Opportunities

HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD. Huawei Confidential Page 32

Code Utility Ratio
Audit Threshold : R99 Code Utility Ratio>70%

R99 Code Utility Ratio Distribution(RNC11) Tota RRC.C

R C At VS.C Code R99 CS.RAB.C
l.Co VS.RRC. ongesti PS.RAB.Con
500 N el tri ODE. Utilit Code ongestion
de.C Rej.Code on.Rate gestion.Rate
Cell Number

400 CI lI bu USE y Utility .Rate.Due.

ong. .Cong .Due.to. .Due.to.code
D D te D Ratio Ratio to.code
300 Num code
5
200
0 H
100
1 42.29
0 SP 11.08 7.06% 0 0 0 0 0
1 %
0 7 A
0% 15% 30% 45% 60% 75% 90% 8
1
R99 Code Utility Ratio 2 H
1 39.20
2 SP 3.25 2.07% 0 0 0 0 0
1 %
Cell Number 7 A
2

• The output R99 code utilization is less than 70% of the RRC, the RAB code congestion ratio is greater
than 1% of the cell list.

HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD. Huawei Confidential Page 33

Code Utility Ratio
Suggestion For Optimizing Opportunities

HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD. Huawei Confidential Page 34

PCH Utility Ratio
Audit Threshold : PCH Utility Ratio >40%

PCH Utility Ratio(RNC11)

25.00%
Oper Cell PCH
PCH Physical Channel Utility Ratio

VS.UTR VS.RRC.Paging1.
20.00% RN ator LA Busy Nu CELL Physical
AN.AttP Loss.PCHCong.C
15.00% CID Nam C Time mbe ID Channel
aging1 ell
10.00%
e r Utility Ratio
H'0 4077 5032
5.00% 11 XXX 420 6354 0.35% 0
011 3.13 1
0.00% H'0 4077
H'0011 H'0011 11 XXX 434 1170 420794 23.38% 6231
LAC
011 0.58

PCH Physical Channel Utility Ratio

• The PCH channel utilization is high, will result in idle state UE paging failure, affecting the user
experience; the while a SCCPCH case, PCH and FACH shared high utilization rate will affect the PCH FACH
state users feel

HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD. Huawei Confidential Page 35

PCH Utility Ratio
Suggestion For Optimizing Opportunities

HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD. Huawei Confidential Page 36

DL/UL CE Resource
Audit Threshold : DL/UL CE Utility Ratio>70%

DL CE Utility Ratio Distribution(RNC11) UL CE Utility Ratio Distribution(RNC151)

60 50
NodeB Number

NodeB Number
50 40
40
30
30
20 20
10 10
0 0
0% 15% 30% 45% 60% 75% 90% 0% 15% 30% 45% 60% 75% 90%
DL CE Utility Ratio UL CE Utility Ratio

NodeB Number NodeB Number

• CE (Channel Element) resources belong to the base station hardware processing resources, usually an AMR
voice services consumed a CE 3GPP protocol called Credit (Credit degrees), the relationship between the
decision by the consumption rules corresponding indicators with CE, Node B in the process of establishing
business through the the NBAP message advertised RNC business CE consumption rules (Consumption
Law), usually, a DL CE corresponds to a Credit.

HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD. Huawei Confidential Page 37

DL/UL CE Resource
Suggestion For Optimizing Opportunities

HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD. Huawei Confidential Page 38

SPU Load

The SPU RNC signaling processing unit, the SPU common SPUa (RAN10 RAN11), SPUb (RAN12)
A SPUa four sub-modules, a SPUb 8 sub-modules, generally use the 1 +1 backup

SPUa SPUb

a1 % b1 %

a2 % b2 %

a3 % b3 %

a4 % b4 %
b5 %
5% CPU bottom b6 %

The then system CPU load b7 %

statistics XPU the total load of
b8 %
each sub-module (Bottom
business) 3% CPU bottom

HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD. Huawei Confidential Page 39

SPU Load
Audit Threshold : SPU expansion proposals are: CPU load of more than 50% of the average of the
SPU

45%
SPU Load (RNC2305) 40%

SPU Load for each RNC sub-system

60.00% 35%

30%
50.00%
25%
CPU Load

40.00% 20%

30.00% 15%

10%
20.00%
5%
10.00% 0%

2011-2-11 0:00

2011-2-11 3:00

2011-2-11 6:00

2011-2-11 9:00

2011-2-11 12:00

2011-2-11 15:00

2011-2-11 18:00

2011-2-11 21:00
0.00%
1 8 15 22 29 36 43 50

SPU Subsystem Number WSPU 0:0:0 WSPU 0:0:1 WSPU 0:0:2 WSPU 0:0:3 WSPU 0:0:4 WSPU 0:0:5

WSPU 0:0:6 WSPU 0:0:7 WSPU 0:2:0 WSPU 0:2:1 WSPU 0:2:2 WSPU 0:2:3

WSPU 0:2:4 WSPU 0:2:5 WSPU 0:2:6 WSPU 0:2:7 WSPU 1:0:0 WSPU 1:0:1

VS.XPU.CPULOAD.MAX VS.XPU.CPULOAD.MEAN WSPU 1:0:2 WSPU 1:0:3 WSPU 1:0:4 WSPU 1:0:5 WSPU 1:0:6 WSPU 1:0:7

WSPU 1:2:0 WSPU 1:2:1 WSPU 1:2:2 WSPU 1:2:3 WSPU 1:2:4 WSPU 1:2:5

WSPU 1:2:6 WSPU 1:2:7 WSPU 1:4:0 WSPU 1:4:1 WSPU 1:4:2 WSPU 1:4:3

WSPU 1:4:4 WSPU 1:4:5 WSPU 1:4:6 WSPU 1:4:7 WSPU 2:0:0 WSPU 2:0:1

WSPU 2:0:2 WSPU 2:0:3 WSPU 2:0:4 WSPU 2:0:5 WSPU 2:0:6 WSPU 2:0:7

WSPU 2:2:0 WSPU 2:2:1 WSPU 2:2:2 WSPU 2:2:3 WSPU 2:2:4 WSPU 2:2:5

WSPU 2:2:6 WSPU 2:2:7 WSPU:Subrack 0 WSPU:Subrack 1 WSPU:Subrack 2

The SPU processing various signaling assessment whether the RNC SPU veneer
bottlenecks in mean occupancy rate, according to the SPU CPU busy 。

HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD. Huawei Confidential Page 40

SPU Load
Suggestion For Optimizing Opportunities

HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD. Huawei Confidential Page 41

Resource and Capacity Audit
Transmission Resource Audit

IU-CS IU-PS IUB IUR

Signaling User Signaling User Signaling User Signaling User

Plane(AT Plane(AT Plane(AT Plane(AT Plane(AT Plane(AT Plane(AT Plane(AT
M/IP) M/IP) M/IP) M/IP) M/IP) M/IP) M/IP) M/IP)
Concerns:
Up and down the line interface busy bandwidth utilization; uplink and downlink throughput
IU-CS IU-PS IUB IUR
Signaling User Plane Signaling User Plane Signaling User Plane Signaling Plane User Plane
Plane Plane Plane
ATM IP ATM IP ATM IP ATM IP ATM IP ATM IP ATM IP ATM IP
70% 500kb 70% 70% 70% 500kbps 70% 70 50% 500kbps 70% 70% 70% 500kbps 70% 70%
ps %
This section will give Iu, Iub, Iur transmission bandwidth load due to the existing network could be a full-IP, ATM, or hybrid transmission, Word reporting structure to
consider all of the scenes, if not the actual scene, will be " the Nodata "prompt

HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD. Huawei Confidential Page 42

IUB Signaling Plane &User Plane
Audit Threshold : Signaling Plane(ATM)>50％;User Plane(ATM/IP)>70％

DL Real Utility Ratio VS.IPPAT DL Assign DL Assign DL Real

TX OS.ANI.IP. DL Real
NODEB H.IPLAYE Peak Busy Busy
20 RNCID ANI BW_CFG( AllocedBw Utility
NAME R.TXBYT Utility Time(As Time(As
NodeB Number

Kbps) d Ratio
15 ES Ratio hour) hour)

10 12341_H_S
395512920. 2011-02-12 2011-02-10
2305 osaYoshiza 156 896.00 164920.00 18.41% 98.09%
00 22:00:00 14:00:00
5 ki

0 09038_H_O
395105897. 2011-02-07 2011-02-08
0% 15% 30% 45% 60% 75% 90% 2305 yamaMatsu 601 896.00 211456.00 23.60% 97.99%
00 19:00:00 20:00:00
numa
DLRealUtilityRatio(%)
09099_H_K
137910209 2011-02-09 2011-02-07
2305 aminokawa 464 3136.00 528526.00 16.85% 97.73%
NODEB NUM Ishita
9.00 14:00:00 02:00:00

IUB
Signaling Plane User Plane
ATM IP ATM IP Need for the utilization of more than 70% of the transfer port
50% 500kbps 70% 70% expansion

HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD. Huawei Confidential Page 43

IUB Signaling Plane &User Plane
Suggestion For Optimizing Opportunities

Congestion, lack of the Iub interface E1 configuration

ATM: increased interface E1 increased interface board

IP : the E1 transmission into FE transmission

HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD. Huawei Confidential Page 44

Case
Customer Challenges Capacity management suggestions Solutions implementation effects
The CSSR of Congestions Solutions
Top10 cells are
below 90% because 1.NodeB split;
of Power/UL WMPT board 2.Modify DPB period from 700ms to 2000ms，
CPU overload 4.Shrink the coverage by change PCPICH or the camping
ENU/CE/NodeB CPU threshold；
congestion;
With the Subs and 1.NodeB splitter;
traffic increase the 2.WBBPd board expansion;
CE Congestion
2.UL GBR and initial bit rate change from 64K to 32K;
congestion will be 3.Enable the HSUPA TTI changed function;
more serious;
Customer benefits: 1.Swtich OFF uplink CAC, or Modify “UlTotalEqUserNum”
UL Congestion
from 95 to 160
The user number （ENU）
2.UL GBR and initial bit rate change from 64K to 32K;
increased about 10% User Num: 151946 76226 168510 96215
and 26% for RNC No.1 RNC No.1 RNC
1.Install NodeB SPC300; RNC ID RNC No.1 Otc. RNC No.2 Otc.
and RNC No.2 DL Power Dec. No.2Dec.
2.RRC rejection parameters optimization;
respectively, but the congestion PS RAB Times per sub
3.Random camping for load balance; 6.6 6.6 5.3 4.4
per BH
congestion is reduced
obviously because of PCH Physical Channel RNC RNC RNC RNC RNC
1.Enable the Cell_PCH states;
the optimization based PCH Congestion Utility Ratio No.1 No.2 No.3 No.4 No.5
2.RAC split;
on network audit and 3rd week of Nov 74.20% 66.20% 83.67% 76.75% 79.14%
forecast
5 days after RAC split 51.90% 59.69% 53.10% 49.88% 54.33%

Page 45
HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES Co., Ltd. HUAWEI Confidential
Thank you
www.huawei.com