Professional Documents
Culture Documents
: Novel Characteristic Parameters for Oil-paper Insulation Assessment from Differential Time-domain Spectroscopy
ABSTRACT
For achieving the aging characteristic parameters of transformer oil-paper insulation, oil-
impregnated pressboard samples are acceleratedly thermally aged at high temperature (~
150 oC) in laboratory, and on the same sample before and after being aged, polarization and
depolarization current (PDC) tests are performed at different temperatures (30, 40, 50 and
60 oC), respectively. Besides analyzing the PDC results, the differential time-domain
spectroscopy (DTDS) technique is introduced to investigate the aging status of oil-paper
insulation and the influence of measurement temperature. The DTDS parameters such as
polarization component Qn, polarization response time τn and line-shape parameter αn are
extracted with DTDS unscrambling method based on PDC data. It is revealed that DTDS
represents similar polarization process and mechanism to PDC, and all the DTDS curves
calculated with the obtained parameters (Qn, τn, αn) are in good fit with those measured. By
analyzing the effect of temperature and aging, two types of relaxation polarization
mechanism are observed, i.e., the interfacial polarizations between oil and paper insulation
and inside the pressboard. The polarization components, response speeds and line-shape
parameters of both the polarization mechanisms increase evidently on the whole with
temperature rising or sample aging. It is demonstrated that, the DTDS theory is suitable for
oil-paper insulation material, the DTDS unscrambling method is effective and objective,
and such DTDS parameters are sensitive and can quantitatively reflect the changing of
temperature and aging condition with regularity. Consequently, the parameters (Qn, τn, αn)
can be considered as the novel characteristic parameters for aging condition estimation of
oil-paper insulation to upgrade the application effect of PDC curves.
Index Terms — Transformer, oil-paper insulation, thermal aging, polarization and
depolarization current (PDC), differential time-domain spectroscopy (DTDS), characteris-
tic parameters.
“fingerprint” curves stored in off-line database [7, 15, 23]. The u(t)
comparison method is effective in application, however, not
U0
satisfying enough. Because the method is mainly based on the
dielectric phenomenon comparison, and unable to deeply Tc Tc
analyze the mechanism how aging condition influences the
dielectric properties. Therefore, it is necessary to perform deep t
investigation on aging characteristic parameters with exact i(t)
physical significance from PDC measurements to improve
PDC test effect.
In this paper, oil-paper insulation samples are artificially ip(t)
aged at high temperature (~ 150 oC) in the laboratory. On the
same sample before and after being aged, PDC tests are carried t
id(t)
out at different temperature respectively. The theory of
differential time-domain spectroscopy (DTDS) based on PDC
measurement is introduced, and the effect of aging condition
and measurement temperature on PDC and DTDS are i(t)
analyzed to investigate the sensitive aging characteristic
parameters and further to prompt the utilization efficiency of ip(t)
PDC measurement data in condition assessment of oil-paper
insulation.
Tc t
id(t)
2 THEORY OF MEASUREMENT AND Figure 2. Waveforms of polarization and depolarization currents.
ANALYSIS TECHNIQUES
Based on basic theory of dielectric response, the
2.1 PDC MEASUREMENT
polarization current is deduced as equations (1); while
The schematic diagram and waveforms of PDC measure- equation (2) expresses the depolarization current [6, 16,
ment are shown in Figures 1 and 2, respectively [6, 15, 24]. 24].
PDC test is performed in two steps. Firstly, the test object
(insulating material or equipment) is charged with a step
excitation U0 for a long period Tc. During this period, the
i p (t ) C0U 0 f (t ) (1)
polarization (charging) current ip through the object as the
0
step response is measured. The current is divided into two id (t ) C0U 0 f (t ) f (t Tc ) (2)
parts, one of which arising from the activation of polariza-
tion process determines the decay segment of current curve, where C0, U0, Tc, σ, ε0 represents the geometric capacitance,
and the other related to the electric conductivity determines applied charging voltage, charging/discharging period,
the steady segment [15, 24]. Secondly, the voltage U0 is composite dc conductivity and vacuum permittivity of the
removed and the object is short-circuited for the same pe- test object, respectively. And f(t) is the response function in
riod Tc. The previously activated polarization process now time domain, defined to describe the polarization
gives rise to the decay depolarization (discharging) current characteristics. For oil-paper insulation, the function and
id in the opposite direction, where no contribution of the the conductivity are mainly influenced by aging degree,
conductivity is present [15, 24]. Restricted by the practical moisture content and geometric structure [13-16, 24].
voltage rising characteristics of dc voltage source, both the Correspondingly, the condition of oil-paper insulation can
polarization and depolarization currents are generally rec- be evaluated by PDC measurement.
orded and analyzed from 1s to Tc. And the depolarization Moreover, PDC measurement can be used for estimation
current is always flipped vertically and shifted leftwards for of sample conductivity σ. If the charging/discharging period
the convenience of data analysis, as shown in Figure 2. Tc is sufficiently long so that f(t+Tc)≈0, equations (1) and
(2) can be combined into equation (3a) to express the
conductivity. And if the values of distance between elec-
trodes d and area of electrodes A are given, the conductivity
ip id can also be obtained from equation (3b) as an equivalent
U0 expression of equation (3a). Practically, the conductivity is
approximately calculated by replacing t with Tc in equation
Test Object (3b) [6, 16, 24].
0
[i p (t ) id (t )] (3a)
C0U 0
A
d
[i p (t ) id (t )] (3b)
Figure 1. PDC measurement schematic circuit.
AU 0
1920 J.-L. Wei et al.: Novel Characteristic Parameters for Oil-paper Insulation Assessment from Differential Time-domain Spectroscopy
2.2 THEORY ANALYSIS lying at t=τn, and it is also thought that each mechanism in
equation (6a) has little effect on the others for ordinary
2.2.1 Time-Domain Dielectric Spectroscopy
dielectric material [25, 26]. This makes it easy to distin-
(TDDS)
guish every peak and objectively get such TDDS
Li was first to present the time-domain dielectric parameters (Qn, τn, αn) from the measured DTDS curve as
spectroscopy (TDDS) theory [25, 26], which holds that equation (6a), and the process is called unscrambling for the
there are exactly finite polarization mechanisms in many DTDS.
dielectrics especially in polymer materials. The For the convenience of DTDS unscrambling, the norma-
mechanisms exhibit different response times under external lized expression of equation (6b) is written as
electric field stress, and are closely related to the molecular
structure in different levels. If a dielectric is fully charged ( x) e x exp( x ) (7)
for a sufficiently long time, the charges stored from all the
where e is a constant of the base of natural logarithm and α
active polarization mechanisms will reach the equilibrium
is the line-shape parameter. Figure 3 shows the standard
value. When the dielectric is discharged through short
curve of equation (7) with different line-shape parameter
circuit after removing charging voltage, the stored charges
[25,26]. It can be seen that the peak, where Φ(1)=1, is
decay with time as equation (4a), called the TDDS function.
corresponding to that of equation (6b).
N
Q G(t ,
n 1
n n , n ) Q0 Q(t ) (4a)
with
G (t , n , n ) exp[ (t / n ) n ] (4b)
where τ1<τ2···<τN, 1/2≤аn≤1, Q0 is the total charge in equili-
brium stored only by dielectric polarization, Q(t) represents
the charges through the dielectric, N is the mechanisms
number, and (Qn, τn, αn) are the TDDS parameters in time
domain of the n-th polarization mechanism [25, 26].
Among them, Qn is called polarization component,
indicating the polarization intensity and the contribution of
the n-th mechanism in Q0, expressed as equation (5). τn is
defined as polarization response time that denotes the
corresponding polarization speed. And αn is called the line-
shape parameter that describes the shape of TDDS curve Figure 3. Standard DTDS curve with different line-shape parameter α.
[25, 26].
Compared with PDC test process, the DTDS theory is
N
considered suitable to PDC measurement, and the
Q0 Qn (5)
n 1
depolarization current of PDC can be utilized as the
discharging current I(t) in equation (6a). Then the DTDS
2.2.2 Differential Time-Domain Spectroscopy unscrambling based on PDC result is performed in three
(DTDS) steps as follows.
Generally, it is essential to accurately separate and deter- Step 1) The number of polarization mechanisms N is ob-
mine each polarization mechanism without any disputation tained by counting the apparent peaks in the
from the measured TDDS curve as equation (4a), where measured DTDS curve on basis of depolarization
more than one mechanism overlapping takes effect during current after PDC test. This can avoid any subjec-
the discharging period. However, it is hardly to be accom- tive assumption to determine the relaxation
plished simply by the uncharacteristic decay curve itself. polarization number.
Thus, as the development, the differential time-domain Step 2) Approximate value ranges of the DTDS parame-
spectroscopy (DTDS) function is defined as the product of ters (Qn, τn, αn) are gotten through comparison be-
the discharging time t and the discharging current I(t) [25, tween the measured DTDS peaks and that in the
26]. Here, I(t) is the differential coefficient of the TDDS standard curves in Figure 3.
function, and the DTDS function thus can be expressed by Step 3) Accurate values of the DTDS parameters are
N determined by fitting the measured curve with
tI (t ) Qn g (t , n , n ) (6a) equation (6a) with the boundary conditions of ob-
n 1 tained approximate ranges in Step 2).
with With the unscrambling method, DTDS theory has been
successfully applied in describing the depolarization current
g (t , n , n ) n (t / n ) n exp[ (t / n ) n ] (6b)
of such dielectrics as capacitor paper, polyethylene
It is observed that the curve of equation (6b) has a unique terephthalate (PET), polypropylene (PP), etc. [25-27], in
characteristic peak only contributed by the n-th mechanism estimating little content of sulphur and oxygen doped in
IEEE Transactions on Dielectrics and Electrical Insulation Vol. 18, No. 6; December 2011 1921
o
gasoline [28], and in analyzing the changes of molecular Firstly, the aged sample is cooled from 150 C down to
structure of benzene and paraffin with temperature varying 60 oC, and kept for 3 d to condense the steam evaporated
[26, 29]. As for oil-paper insulation, it is certain that the from oil and pressboard during aging process and re-reach
aging condition affects its molecular structure and polariza- moisture equilibrium [30]. The aged oil is then sampled to
tion mechanisms, and the parameters (Qn, τn, αn) can be ex- measure the physical and chemical properties.
tracted to evaluate the condition accordingly.
3 EXPERIMENTAL ARRANGEMENT
As test object, the oil-paper insulation sample comprises
ordinary 25# naphthenic transformer oil (freezing point not
higher than -25 oC) and a single-sheet high density
(1.1g/cm3) transformer pressboard of 1.5 mm thick in this
paper. The whole experimental procedure is shown in Fig-
ure 4, as is divided into 3 phases, i.e., the treatments and
tests on the new sample before being aged, the aging
process, and the treatments and tests on the same sample
after being aged.
Phase 1). The sample is prepared and tested with relevant
methods under unaged condition as follows.
Firstly, the circular disk samples of 134 mm diameter are
cut from an original 1.5 mm thick single-sheet pressboard,
and dried for 48 h at 105 oC/100 Pa in a vacuum drying
cabinet. Then it is exposed to ambient air to reach the initial
moisture content 0.5% by monitoring its weight increment
with a high-precision electronic balance. Meanwhile, DP
measurement is applied on some other dried part of the cut
original pressboard to describe the unaged properties.
Secondly, the disk pressboard is clamped between copper
parallel plate electrodes in a metal container for volume
current measurement as shown in Figure 5. Here, the three-
electrode test system is employed with a top electrode (120
mm diameter), a bottom electrode (100 mm diameter) and a
guard ring electrode (120 mm diameter) surrounding the
bottom one, and the electrodes are connected to the high
voltage source (HI), current input connector (LO) and
ground of PDC test equipment, respectively.
Subsequently, the container is sealed and the air inside is
pumped out through the exhaust port on container top by a
vacuum pump, and the pressure is kept below 100 Pa for a
while. New transformer oil is continuously pulled into the
container through the oil port at the bottom under vacuum
condition until submerging the pressboard. The completely
Figure 4. Flowchart of the experiment.
sealed container is put into a temperature-controlled oven
shown in Figure 5, and stands at 60 oC for 7 days to ensure
the oil fully immerse pressboard and reach moisture equili-
brium between pressboard and oil [30]. The unaged oil in
the container then is sampled through the oil port for physi-
cal and chemical properties analysis.
Finally, the PDC tests are performed on the prepared un-
aged oil-paper insulation sample at 60, 50, 40 and 30 oC,
respectively. For decreasing the effect of moisture
migration between oil and pressboard on PDC tests due to
temperature variation, the sample is maintained at each
temperature for 12 h including the test time.
Phase 2). The sample is heated at high temperature 150
o
C for 8 d under sealed condition to induce
accelerated thermal aging.
Phase 3). The aged sample is treated for relevant tests un-
der aged condition as follows. Figure 5. Structure schematic of aging test device.
1922 J.-L. Wei et al.: Novel Characteristic Parameters for Oil-paper Insulation Assessment from Differential Time-domain Spectroscopy
Secondly, like the PDC test process before aging, the lower grade transformer. Despite all that, the mechanical
aged sample is sequentially maintained at 60, 50, 40 and 30 tensile with the DP value 748 is not much weaker than that
o
C for 12 h to perform PDC tests at these temperatures, with the value of 1000, for the two values both mean the
separately. Until now, the sample is kept isolated from out- early stage of pressboard aging process. Moreover, the used
side air since put into the container. pressboard can be gotten more easily from market.
Finally, the container is opened and the aged pressboard
is taken out for DP measurement. Thus the whole experi- Table 1. Relevant properties of oil-paper sample.
ment is completed. Press-
Oil
board
The PDC measurement equipment is developed at Xi’an Aging
Acid Moisture Volume
Jiaotong University, with a high resistance electrometer condition pH
DP value content resistivity
value
with a built-in dc charging voltage source (Keithley 6517A) (mg KOH/g) (mg/L) (m)
[31], a computer and a GPIB card. A required software plat- Unaged 748 5.8 0.0096 18.5 1.7×1011
form is developed to control this hardware system and
record PDC measurement results. The charging voltage of Aged 211 4.3 0.025 23.5 6.4×1010
every PDC test is set at 500 V with a period of 5000 s. To
avoid influence of residual charges, the sample is grounded
at least 2 h before each test. 4.2 PDC MEASUREMENTS
4.2.1 Temperature Effect
4 EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS AND Figures 6 and 7 show the PDC curves under unaged and
DISCUSSION aged conditions at different temperatures, respectively. The
results indicate that temperature has evident effect on both
4.1 PHYSICAL AND CHEMICAL PROPERTIES currents, and the curves under unaged and aged conditions
The physical and chemical properties of oil-paper insula- behave consistent variation tendency.
tion sample measured under unaged and aged conditions are As mentioned in above section, polarization current is
both shown in Table 1. composed of two parts. One is the decay current generated
It can be seen that the properties of oil-paper insulation by charged polarization mechanisms, and the other is the
change significantly, the DP of pressboard and pH value of steady conduction current related to the conductivity [15,
oil both decrease, and the acid value, m.c. and volume 24]. While depolarization current only comprises the former
conductivity of oil all increase after aging. part. Accordingly, it can be found from Figures 6 and 7 that,
For oil-paper insulation, during aging process, the chemi- with temperature rising, the decay segment of polarization
cal reactions under combined effect of thermal stress, acid current shifts upwards and leftwards as well as that of
and the impossibly eliminated oxygen, break masses of depolarization current. The shift regularity indicates that
cellulose molecules in pressboard and decrease its DP value polarization intensity and current contributed by active
[1-4]. Meanwhile, strongly polar and conductive polarization mechanisms, and the corresponding polariza-
substances, such as organic acid and water, are produced. tion response speed both improve. Due to that the oil
These substances result in the increase of hydrogen ion conductivity σoil is generally much larger than paper
concentration and higher conductivity of oil [1-4, 32]. All conductivity σpaper, σoil and σpaper are deduced to be approx-
above are in charge of the changes shown by Table 1. imately proportional to the initial part and steady part of
It can be noticed that DP of the unaged pressboard is 748, polarization current, respectively, by the conductivity
smaller than the normal value about 1000. This difference calculation equation of composite insulation [13, 16, 24].
may be due to that the pressboard used in this experiment is Both the two parts of the polarization current shift upwards,
produced by a small-scale factory and served in 35kV or representing higher conductivity of both oil and pressboard.
-8
10
-8
10
-9
Pol Current (A)
Pol Current (A)
10 o
60 C
o
60 C
-9
o
50 C 10
o
50 C
o
-10
40 C
10 40 C
o
o
(b) o
(a) 30 C -10
10 30 C
0 1 2 3 4
10
0 1
10 10
2
10
3 4
10 10 10 10 10 10
Time (s) Time (s)
Figure 6. Temperature effect on polarization current of PDC under (a) unaged condition (b) aged condition.
IEEE Transactions on Dielectrics and Electrical Insulation Vol. 18, No. 6; December 2011 1923
-8
10 o
60 C
o
60 C o
50 C o
-8
50 C
10
-9
10
Depol Current (A)
-12
10 (a) A second decay segment
(b) A second decay segment
-11
in the same curve 10 in the same curve
0 1 2 3 4
10 10 10 10 10 10
0 1
10 10
2
10
3
10
4
Aged
-9
10 Aged
Pol and Depol Currents (A)
-10
10
-10
10
Unaged Unaged
-11
10
(a) -11
(b)
10
0 1 2 3 4
10 10 10 10 10 10
0
10
1
10
2
10
3
10
4
-8 Aged
10 10
-8
Aged
-9
-9
10
10
-10
10
Unaged
-10
10
-11
Unaged 10
-11
10 -12
10 (d)
(c)
0 1 2 3 4
10
0
10
1
10
2
10
3
10
4 10 10 10 10 10
Time (s) Time (s)
Table 2. Calculated DC conductivity of pressboard sample at different temperature. The observation would be helpful to
temperature.
efficiently utilize PDC measurement data.
Aging Conductivity, σpaper (S/m)
Temperature, T (C)
Condition 30 oC 40 oC 50 oC 60 oC
60 50 40 30
-12
Unaged 1.25×10-14 3.38×10-14 9.12×10-14 2.33×10-13 10
Unaged
Aged 2.31×10-14 5.4×10-14 1.59×10-13 4.56×10-13 Aged
Figure 9, from which it should be noted that the logarithms Figure 9. Calculated conductivity of pressboard sample versus reciprocal
absolute temperature.
of conductivities demonstrate linear variation with inverse
of absolute temperature and are in agreement with equation 4.3 DIFFERENTIAL TIME-DOMAIN
(8) under both unaged and aged conditions. The slopes of SPECTROSCOPY
two straight lines are much close to each other. This
represents that the conductivities obtained under different 4.3.1 Temperature and Aging Effects
temperature and aging condition are comparable by Based on the measured PDC results, the measured DTDS
converting them into those at a certain standard curves are obtained, as in Figures 10-12.
IEEE Transactions on Dielectrics and Electrical Insulation Vol. 18, No. 6; December 2011 1925
-7
Time Current (As)
10
The solid lines in Figures 10 and 11 show the effect of interfacial polarizations can be indicated by PDC measure-
measurement temperature on the DTDS under unaged and ment. Therefore, they are just corresponding to the two
aged conditions, respectively. It can be seen that tempera- peaks, i.e., the interfacial polarization between oil and
ture greatly impacts the DTDS, and the unaged DTDS pressboard is related to peak 1 and the polarization inside
curves show similar trend to the aged ones with temperature pressboard to peak 2. Temperature rising enhances both the
changing. At lower temperature, each curve has only a peak polarization intensity and response speed of the two interfa-
(measured peak 1). With temperature rising, the peak shifts cial polarization mechanisms. The observation is qualita-
upwards and leftwards, and another slight peak (measured tively consistent to that of temperature effect on PDC test.
peak 2) becomes more evident. The solid lines in Figure 12 show the aging effect on
According to the DTDS theory, the two peaks are consi- DTDS by rearranging the measured curves in Figures 10
dered to be contributed by two kinds of different polariza- and 11, and it is similar to the temperature effect on DTDS.
tion mechanisms [25, 26]. As analyzed above, the two
(b)
(a) Unscrambled
peak 1 (aged)
10
-7 Unscrambled
peak 1 (aged)
Unscrambled -7
10
Time Current (As)
Time Current (As)
-8
10
aged
-8
10
unaged aged
-9
unaged
10
0 1 2 3 4
10 10 10 10 10 10
0
10
1 2
10
3
10 10
4
10
aged
unaged
Unscrambled
-8
10 peak 2 (aged)
aged Unscrambled
peak 2 (unaged)
-8
10
unaged
-9
0 1 2 3 4
10
0 1 2 3 4
10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
Time (s) Time (s)
Measured, --- Unscrambled
Figure 12. Aging effect on DTDS curves at (a) 30 oC (b) 40 oC (c) 50 oC (d) 60 oC.
1926 J.-L. Wei et al.: Novel Characteristic Parameters for Oil-paper Insulation Assessment from Differential Time-domain Spectroscopy
3.0
Temp Peak 1 Peak 2
aged, 1 aged, 2
(oC) Q1 (C) τ1 (s) α1 Q2 (C) τ2 (s) α2 2.5 unaged, 1 unaged, 2
-7
30 8.9×10 2580 0.68 \ \ \
Pol Response Time, n (s)
2.0
40 1.08×10-6 780 0.73 \ \ \
50 1.01×10-6 215 0.75 2.4×10-7 1300 0.55
1.5
-6
60 1.05×10 64 0.76 3.1×10-7 1020 0.66
1.0