Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Activities Guide and Evaluation Rubric - Unit 1 - Task 1 - Initial Evaluation
Activities Guide and Evaluation Rubric - Unit 1 - Task 1 - Initial Evaluation
1. Activity Description
Type of Activity: Individual
Evaluation Moment: Initial
Highest Activity Score: 25 points
The activity starts on: Wednesday, The activity ends on:
August 26, 2020 Tuesday, September 8,
2020
With this activity, the following learning outcomes are expected:
Identify concepts for reading context on health problems arising from the
relationship between geopolitics, environmental, determinants in health
and sustainable development.
Individual activity:
1
Is an individual activity. You must create a document of maximum 3
(three) pages and upload in the evaluation environment and forum. The
deliverable must include:
- Cover
- Goals of the activity
- To describe 8 (eight) priority dimensions and the 2 transversal
dimensions of 10-year plan for public health 2012-2021.
- To describe sustainable development goals (UNDP, 2015).
- A paragraph includes the relationships and definitions for the next
terms: Geopolitics, Sustainable development, Environment,
Determinants in health.
- Conclusions
- Bibliographic references according to APA standards.
In the Evaluation Environment, you must: as the final product you must
upload the deliverable in word Format, maximum three pages with the
dates described in this guide. In the same document, you must attach the
paragraph with the concepts and include the bibliographical references.
2
Individual Work Evidences:
The individual evidence to be submitted is:
Format:
• Document in Word
• Page size: Letter
• Typeface: Arial
• Font size: 12
• Interline spacing: 1.5 cm
Collaborative Evidences:
No collaborative evidence is required in this activity.
3
Under the Academic Code of Conduct, the actions that infringe the
academic order, among others, are the following: paragraph e)
"Plagiarism is to present as your own work all or part of a written report,
task or document of invention carried out by another person. It also
implies the use of citations or lack of references, or it includes citations
where there is no match between these and the reference" and paragraph
f) "To reproduce, or copy for profit, educational resources or results of
research products, which have rights reserved for the University ".
(Acuerdo 029 - 13 de diciembre de 2013, Article 99)
4
This criterion represents 10 If your work is at this level, you can get
points of the total of 25 points between 1 point and 5 points
of the activity.
Low level: does not identify the 8 (eight) priority
dimensions and the 2 transversal dimensions in
the Ten-year plan for public health. Also, does not
identify sustainable development goals (UNDP,
2015).
If your work is at this level, you can get 0
points.
Second Evaluation Criterion: High Level: The Paragraph contain four (4)
core conceptual.
If your work is at this level, you can get
Definitions in the paragraph. between 4 points and 5 points
Contributions in the forum. If your work is at this level, you can get
between 4 points and 5 points
5
If your work is at this level, you can get 0
points.
Fourth Evaluation Criterion: High Level: The handling of references and
Grammatical Norms is satisfactory. The APA
referencing standards are used.
If your work is at this level, you can get
Bibliographical references and
between 4 points and 5 points
grammatical norms.
Average Level: Bibliographic references are
presented but APA standards are not used. The
grammatical Norms is satisfactory.
This criterion represents 5
points of the total of 25 points If your work is at this level, you can get
of the activity. between 1 point and 3 points