Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Free Speech
Name
Institutional Affiliation
Course
Instructor
Date
2
Free Speech
The approach to free speech by the Supreme Court in the United States is not wholly
categorical. It is essential to identify the category of speech at issue in determining the First
Amendment standards, which comprise the level of judicial scrutiny. The types of speech that are
protected and upheld by the Supreme Court and the U.S constitution are commercial speech, core
political speech, and expressive conduct. The categories of speech that are not protected are
Expressive conduct type of speech is also artistic speech, which is also referred to as
“symbolic speech.” It is a non-verbal form of speech where individuals use to communicate their
speech. Some examples of expressive speech are creating or demolishing an object when
conducted as a statement, putting on clothes with meaningful symbols, and using messages
written in codes, ideas, or computer language structures. On the other hand, commercial speech
is a form of speech that suggests a commercial transaction. It was defined in “Ohralik v. Ohio
States Bar Assn.” it is a speech or writing in place of a business with plans or interests in earning
profit or revenue. For example, a business person selling products would use commercial speech
in marketing or advertising their products. Core political speech is the type of speech that is
highly protected. Political speech is exceptional in cases where an individual suffers or stands
for political office as a candidate, which means they can be subject to substantial speech
regulations.
Obscenity is a form of speech that is not protected or upheld by the constitution or the
Supreme Court in the U.S.A. material referred to as obscene appeals to the “prurient interest in
sex, or depict or offensively describes sexual activities, and lack any artistic, scientific or literary
3
value. Child pornography is also not protected since the sale and advertising of pornographic
literature materials are integral to the criminal conduct of such material. Presenting visual scenes
that depict sexual conduct to underage children is limited. Finally, actual threats are also
motive is likely to result in unlawful violence to other individuals or a group of individuals. For