EAP 4 ASSIGNMENT COVER SHEET

Name: …………NGO…………CHI…………CONG…………I.D…………21002080…………
Class:………EAP4-1121WSB-4………….
Assignment: ………Summary…critique………
Assignment Question: (write out in full) …… Nuclear power: dirty, dangerous and expensive.......
YouTube/ Google Drive link: ............................................................................................................

Due date: ….11…/…1.…/……2022……. Date submitted: ….11…/…1.…/……2022……

x I hold a copy of this assignment if the original is lost or damaged.

x I certify that no part of this assignment or product has been copied from any
other student’s work or from any other source except where due
acknowledgement is made in the assignment.
x I affirm that no part of this assignment/product has been written/produced for
me by any other person except where collaboration has been authorised by the
teacher concerned.
x I am aware that this work may be reproduced and submitted to plagiarism
detection software programs for the purpose of detecting possible plagiarism
(which may retain a copy on its database for future plagiarism checking).

Note: An examiner or teacher has the right to NOT mark this assignment if the above
declaration has not been signed.

Student’s Signature: ……….Cong.……… Date: …10..…/….1.…/……2022…….

EXTENSION – To be approved BEFORE original submission date

Supporting evidence sighted: Yes / No Extension approved / Extension not approved

If approved, new submission date ____/____/_____ Teacher’s Signature : ___________________

1
 Summary critique

Ngo Chi Cong – 21002080

EAP4-1121WSB-4

10/1/2022

Mr. Huy

Nuclear power: dirty, dangerous and expensive

2
Greenpeace, 2012, ‘Nuclear Power: dirty, dangerous and expensive’,
Greenpeace International
The article ‘Nuclear Power: dirty, dangerous and expensive’ written

by Greenpeace illustrate the negative effect of nuclear power. The essay

clarifies the menaces of nuclear power. This article will fascinating and

useful for everyone interested in environmental and power issues, mainly

environmentalists and the government.

In this article, the author points out the harm of nuclear power by

memorizing nuclear disasters happened in Chernobyl and Fukushima.

Which had released a massive amount of radioactive materials into the

atmosphere. Thereby, Greenpeace warns us about awfully hazardous

nuclear disasters are a consequence of both human mistakes and natural

disasters. Additionally, the author indicates the astronomical building

costs of the nuclear reactor. In addition, nuclear fuel and other radioactive

wastes are enormous problems that have not been any permanent storage

solution. Finally, nuclear power is proved to be a threat to the

environment because of raising climate change.

Greenpeace’s illuminating of the danger of nuclear power is

obvious. The author also combines clear evidence to prove his viewpoint.

Furthermore, the information and idea are logically organized. The

paragraphs are divided reasonably Obviously, the titles at the beginning

of each paragraph Help the reader easy to grasp the content. Although,

Greenpeace’s article just shows a one-way opinion. The author only gives

us the negative effect of nuclear power without presenting any benefit of

it. After all, this is article is written fluently and convincingly.

3
 In conclusion, Greenpeace does not encourage the use of nuclear

power. However, nuclear power is a hot issue that needs to be studied and

discussed more in the future.