Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Department of Education
Region XI
Division of Island Garden City of Samal
Peñaplata Samal District, Island Garden City of Samal
CONSOLIDATED RESULT
School: Matanos National High School District: Kaputian SY: 2021-2022
Subject: Science Grade Level: 10 Quarter: Second
C
Number of Students: 23 38 61
Highest Score: 31 31 0
Lowest Score: 7 4 3
Range: 24 27 27
MEAN 14.39 13.95 14.17
Mean Percentage Score: 35.98 34.88 35.43
Standard Deviation: 6.81 6.39 6.6
###
###
###
###
LS: 3 31 HS
14
-6 1 7 21 27 34
SD 3- SD 2- SD 1- MEAN SD 1+ SD 2+ SD 3+
School: Matanos National High School District: Kaputian No of Lerners: 61 No. of MELC: 6
Frequency of Correct
ITEM Number
Frequency of Error
Error/Competency
Correct Response
Competencies
Rank of Most
Rank of LLC
COMPETENCIES
Average % of
Average % of
% of Correct
Response
Response
Learned
% Error
Test of Reliability
School: Matanos National High School District: Kaputian
Subject: Science Grade Level: 10 Quarter: Second SY: 2021-2022
C
Group Difficulty Discrimination
Item No.
ANSWERS Correct
U L Answer
T Index Remarks Action D Index Remarks Action
23 38 A B C D Letter No.
U 23 3 4 8 8 8 1
1 L 38 7 5 14 12
C 14
22 0.36 Difficult Revise -6 -0.26 Poor Item Rejected or Revised
1
U 23 7 7 4 5 7 2
2 L 38 10 18 3 7
A 10
17 0.28 Difficult Revise -3 -0.13 Poor Item Rejected or Revised
2
U 23 1 6 12 4 12 3
3 L 38 4 14 16 4
C 16
28 0.46 Average Retain -4 -0.17 Poor Item Rejected or Revised
3
U 23 5 5 10 3 5 4
4 L 38 11 5 15 7
A 11
16 0.26 Difficult Revise -6 -0.26 Poor Item Rejected or Revised
4
U 23 2 5 7 9 9 5
5 L 38 9 7 6 16
D 16
25 0.41 Average Retain -7 -0.3 Poor Item Rejected or Revised
5
U 23 0 2 11 10 11 6
6 L 38 4 10 14 10
C 14
25 0.41 Average Retain -3 -0.13 Poor Item Rejected or Revised
6
U 23 3 12 2 6 2 7
7 L 38 10 16 5 7
C 5
7 0.11 Very Difficult Discard -3 -0.13 Poor Item Rejected or Revised
7
U 23 1 7 11 4 7 8
8 L 38 6 11 14 7
B 11
18 0.3 Difficult Revise -4 -0.17 Poor Item Rejected or Revised
8
U 23 6 2 12 3 6 9
9 L 37 9 7 18 3
A 9
15 0.25 Difficult Revise -3 -0.13 Poor Item Rejected or Revised
9
U 23 9 1 4 9 9 10
10 L 38 17 5 5 11
D 11
20 0.33 Difficult Revise -2 -0.09 Poor Item Rejected or Revised
10
U 23 3 3 9 8 8 11
11 L 38 4 7 9 18
D 18
26 0.43 Average Retain -10 -0.43 Poor Item Rejected or Revised
11
U 23 3 8 5 7 8 12
12 L 38 6 21 3 8
B 21
29 0.48 Average Retain -13 -0.57 Poor Item Rejected or Revised
12
U 23 1 7 14 1 14 13
13 L 38 10 14 10 4
C 10
24 0.39 Difficult Revise 4 0.17 Poor Item Rejected or Revised
13
U 23 3 6 10 4 10 14
14 L 38 6 11 17 4
C 17
27 0.44 Average Retain -7 -0.3 Poor Item Rejected or Revised
14
U 23 4 1 9 9 9 15
15 L 38 12 8 9 9
D 9
18 0.3 Difficult Revise 0 0 Poor Item Rejected or Revised
15
U 23 2 3 10 8 10 16
16 L 38 5 4 12 17
C 12
22 0.36 Difficult Revise -2 -0.09 Poor Item Rejected or Revised
16
U 23 1 11 6 5 6 17
17 L 38 9 13 10 6
C 10
16 0.26 Difficult Revise -4 -0.17 Poor Item Rejected or Revised
17
U 23 2 6 9 6 9 18
18 L 38 7 9 16 6
C 16
25 0.41 Average Retain -7 -0.3 Poor Item Rejected or Revised
18
U 23 1 9 11 2 11 19
19 L 38 4 12 19 3
C 19
30 0.49 Average Retain -8 -0.35 Poor Item Rejected or Revised
19
U 23 6 5 4 8 6 20
20 L 38 14 10 5 9
A 14
20 0.33 Difficult Revise -8 -0.35 Poor Item Rejected or Revised
20
U 23 4 2 7 10 4 21
21 L 38 3 12 13 10
A 3
7 0.11 Very Difficult Discard 1 0.04 Poor Item Rejected or Revised
21
U 23 5 10 2 6 6 22
22 L 38 3 28 4 3
D 3
9 0.15 Very Difficult Discard 3 0.13 Poor Item Rejected or Revised
22
U 23 2 7 11 3 7 23
23 L 38 4 20 7 7
B 20
27 0.44 Average Retain -13 -0.57 Poor Item Rejected or Revised
23
U 23 4 7 7 5 7 24
24 L 38 2 22 12 2
B 22
29 0.48 Average Retain -15 -0.65 Poor Item Rejected or Revised
24
U 23 2 6 5 10 5 25
25 L 38 12 7 8 11
C 8
13 0.21 Difficult Revise -3 -0.13 Poor Item Rejected or Revised
25
U 23 0 4 5 14 14 26
26 L 38 4 5 7 22
D 22
36 0.59 Average Retain -8 -0.35 Poor Item Rejected or Revised
26
U 23 1 15 2 5 15 27
27 L 38 6 22 4 6
B 22
37 0.61 Average Retain -7 -0.3 Poor Item Rejected or Revised
27
U 23 0 4 14 5 5 28
28 L 38 8 8 14 8
D 8
13 0.21 Difficult Revise -3 -0.13 Poor Item Rejected or Revised
28
U 23 2 9 11 1 9 29
29 L 38 2 19 14 3
B 19
28 0.46 Average Retain -10 -0.43 Poor Item Rejected or Revised
29
U 23 7 5 3 8 5 30
30 L 38 9 17 1 11
B 17
22 0.36 Difficult Revise -12 -0.52 Poor Item Rejected or Revised
30
U 23 4 5 8 6 6 31
31 L 38 4 4 19 11
D 11
17 0.28 Difficult Revise -5 -0.22 Poor Item Rejected or Revised
31
U 23 3 5 8 7 3 32
32 L 38 5 12 10 11
A 5
8 0.13 Very Difficult Discard -2 -0.09 Poor Item Rejected or Revised
32
U 23 2 5 13 3 13 33
33 L 38 5 4 18 11
C 18
31 0.51 Average Retain -5 -0.22 Poor Item Rejected or Revised
33
U 23 3 10 4 6 3 34
34 L 38 10 6 11 11
A 10
13 0.21 Difficult Revise -7 -0.3 Poor Item Rejected or Revised
34
U 23 5 2 7 9 9 35
35 L 38 6 5 7 20
D 20
29 0.48 Average Retain -11 -0.48 Poor Item Rejected or Revised
35
U 23 1 3 6 13 13 36
36 L 38 9 7 10 12
D 12
25 0.41 Average Retain 1 0.04 Poor Item Rejected or Revised
36
U 23 1 14 5 3 14 37
37 L 38 3 15 13 7
B 15
29 0.48 Average Retain -1 -0.04 Poor Item Rejected or Revised
37
U 23 2 3 14 4 14 38
38 L 38 8 11 12 7
C 12
26 0.43 Average Retain 2 0.09 Poor Item Rejected or Revised
38
U 22 2 9 8 3 2 39
39 L 38 8 13 12 5
A 8
10 0.16 Very Difficult Discard -6 -0.26 Poor Item Rejected or Revised
39
U 23 5 4 4 10 10 40
40 L 38 14 7 5 12
D 12
22 0.36 Difficult Revise -2 -0.09 Poor Item Rejected or Revised
40
U 0 0 0 0 0 #REF! 41
41 L 0 0 0 0 0
0 #REF!
#REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF!
41
junelo4nollesofsamalcity
3
Explain the effects of EM radiation on living things and the environment 18 19 31 37 38
4
Predict the qualitative characteristics (orientation, type, and magnification) of
7 8 9 10 11 21 22 23 24 25
images formed by plane and curved mirrors and lenses
5 Identify ways in which the properties of mirrors and lenses determine their use in
12 13 14 15 26 27 28 29
optical instruments (e.g., cameras and binoculars)
6
Explain the operation of a simple electric motor and generator 20 33 34 35 36 39 40
junelo.fornolles@deped.gov.ph
Region: XI Division: Island Garden City of Samal Implementine Secion Curriculum Implementation Division Developed by: JUNELO C. FORNOLLES Dsignation: Div. Testing Coordinator SY: 2021-2022
TITLE: Test of Reliability School: Matanos National High School District: Kaputian HPS: 40 Highest Score 31 Lowest Score 4 Upper Group: 23
SUBJECT: Science Grade Level: 10 Quarter: Second Mean(UG) 14.39 MPS (UG) 35.98 SD(UG) 6.81 Lower Group: 38
Prepared by: ERICKA JOY E. JUNIO Checked & Verified: EMMALYN W. BANGCAS Approved: JOANN M. BENOYA Mean(LG) 13.95 MPS (LG) 34.88 SD (LG) 6.39 Total: 61
Designation: TEACHER I Designation: School Testing Coor. Designation: PRINCIPAL I Mean(Overall) 14.17 MPS (Overall) 35.43 SD(OverAll) 6.6 31 7 31 4
1 C B C B B C C C D D D D B D A C D D C C A D A C 3 4 8 8 ###
2 A B B B C A A A B B B B C D D D D A C A D A A C 7 7 4 5 ###
3 C D B D B C D C D C C C C B C C A C C C B B C B 1 6 12 4 ###
4 A C C C C A A A B C C C C B B C D D B A C B D A 5 5 10 3 ###
5 D D D C C D D D B C C B D B A B B C D D C A C D 2 5 7 9 ###
6 C D C B D C C C D C C C D D C C B D D C D C D D 0 2 11 10 ###
7 C B B A D D D B A B B A B D B B D B C B D C B B 3 12 2 6 ###
8 B B B A C B B B C C C C B C C C D C C B D D D C 1 7 11 4 ###
9 A C A D B C A A D C C C A C C C C C D A A C B C 6 2 12 3 ###
10 D D D C A D D D C A A A A A A A A D D D D C B C 9 1 4 9 ###
11 D B D D A C D D D C C B C D A B A C C D C C D C 3 3 9 8 ###
12 B D C C C B B B B D D D C B D D D A A B B C A B 3 8 5 7 ###
13 C C A D C C C C C B B B C B B C B C C C B C C C 1 7 14 1 ###
14 C C A C D C C C C B B B C D B B B A D C A C D C 3 6 10 4 ###
15 D A B C D A D C D D D C D C C C C D D C D A C A 4 1 9 9 ###
16 C A C B C C C C B A D D D C D D D C C B D C D C 2 3 10 8 ###
17 C D D B B B B C B C B B C B D D A C C C B B B D 1 11 6 5 ###
18 C C C D B C C C D C D D B D B C A B B D C A C B 2 6 9 6 ###
19 C B C C C C C C C D B B B D B B B A C C C B C B 1 9 11 2 ###
20 A A B D D A A A D D B B C A B B C D D C C A D D 6 5 4 8 ###
21 A B D D C A B C D C D D A A C C A D D C D D C D 4 2 7 10 ###
22 D C D B B D D B B B A A D C A B A B B B A B D D 5 10 2 6 ###
23 B C B B B B C A B B C C D C C C D C C B C D C A 2 7 11 3 ###
24 B C B C A B B B C C D D A B A D B C C A D B C D 4 7 7 5 ###
25 C D B D D C C A D D D C D A D D B C B D C B B B 2 6 5 10 ###
26 D D D D D D D D B C D D B B D D D C C D D C C B 0 4 5 14 ###
27 B B D B B D D B D B B B B C B B B B A B B C B D 1 15 2 5 ###
28 D B C D D B C D C B C C D B C C C C C C C C C D 0 4 14 5 ###
29 B A C B B B B B C A B C C C B B D C C C C B C C 2 9 11 1 ###
30 B A A B B B B B A D D D C C D D D A A C D D A A 7 5 3 8 ###
31 D C D D C C C C A D C D B D A A B C B C B D B A 4 5 8 6 ###
32 A C B A C A B C D C C B A D C D B D D C B C D D 3 5 8 7 ###
33 C C B C C C C C C A C D A C C B D B B C D C C B 2 5 13 3 ###
34 A C D D B A D B B A C B D B D B A B B C C D B B 3 10 4 6 ###
35 D D C C D D D D A B A B C A D C A D D A D C C C 5 2 7 9 ###
36 D D D D D D D D B C C C D A B D D C C C D B D D 1 3 6 13 ###
37 B B B B C B B C B D B C C C B B D B B B B B D A 1 14 5 3 ###
38 C C C C C C C C D C B C D C D D C C C A B B C A 2 3 14 4 ###
39 A A B C D B B Grade
D Level:
C B B C D C B C C C B C A B B 2 9 8 3 ###
40 D D D D D D D D B B C D C D C B A A A A D A B C 5 4 4 10 ###
41 0 0 0 0 ###
42 0 0 0 0 ###
43 0 0 0 0 ###
44 0 0 0 0 ###
45 0 0 0 0 ###
46 0 0 0 0 ###
47 0 0 0 0 ###
48 0 0 0 0 ###
49 0 0 0 0 ###
50 0 0 0 0 ###
51 0 0 0 0 ###
52 0 0 0 0 ###
53 0 0 0 0 ###
54 0 0 0 0 ###
55 0 0 0 0 ###
56 0 0 0 0 ###
57 0 0 0 0 ###
58 0 0 0 0 ###
59 0 0 0 0 ###
60 0 0 0 0 ###
Total Score: 16 19 16 15 31 29 29 9 10 8 8 14 10 8 10 7 12 13 20 13 13 11 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 HS: 31 LS: 7
2 Do not edit the number of upper group and lower group as well as the HPS, the template will automaticaly count after encoding the Data
3 Enter the Letter of the correct answer of the test to Answer Column (The green Cells). If the test is not a multiple choice enter letter A for the answer and A for the leaner's answer if correct and B, C, or D if
wrong.
4 Enter the responses of the Learners under the Students Number. This is for 4 choices (A, B. C & D)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56
Region: XI Division: Island Garden City of Samal Implementine SecionCurriculum Implementation Division Developed by: JUNELO C. FORNOLLES Dsignation: Div. Testing Coordinator SY: 2021-2022
TITLE: Test of Reliability School: Matanos National High Schoo District: Kaputian HPS: 40 Highest Score 31 Lowest Score 4 Upper Group: 23
SUBJECT: Science Grade Level: 10 Quarter: Second Mean(UG) 14.39 MPS (UG) 35.98 SD(UG) 6.81 Lower Group: 38
Prepared by: ERICKA JOY E. JUNIO Checked & Verified: EMMALYN W. BANGCAS Approved: JOANN M. BENOYA Mean(LG) 13.95 MPS (LG) 34.88 SD (LG) 6.39 Total: 61
Designation: TEACHER I Designation: School Testing Coor. Designation: PRINCIPAL I Mean(Overall) 14.17 MPS (Overall) 35.43 SD(OverAll) 6.6 31 7 31 4
2 Enter the responses of the Learners under the Students Number. This is for 4 choices (A, B. C & D)
junelo.fornolles@deped.gov.ph
UG LG
Highest 31 31
Wrong Data
38 14 2 0 1
38 10 3 0 1 The number of learners for the upper group is
38 16 4 0 1 greater than or equal to the number the lower
38 11 5 0 1 group
38 16 6 0 1
38 14 7 0 1
38 5 8 0 1
38 11 9 0 1
38 9 10 0 1
38 11 11 0 1
38 18 12 0 1
38 21 13 0 1
38 10 14 0 1
38 17 15 0 1
38 9 16 0 1
38 12 17 0 1
38 10 18 0 1
38 16 19 0 1
38 19 20 0 1
38 14 21 0 1
38 3 22 0 1
38 3 23 0 1
38 20 24 0 1
38 22 25 0 1
38 8 26 0 1
38 22 27 0 1
38 22 28 0 1
38 8 29 0 1
38 19 30 0 1
38 17 31 0 1
38 11 32 0 1
38 5 33 0 1
38 18 34 0 1
38 10 35 0 1
38 20 36 0 1
38 12 37 0 1
38 15 38 0 1
38 12 39 0 1
38 8 40 0 1
38 12 41 0 1
0 Err:502 1 0
0 Err:502 1 0
0 Err:502 1 0
0 Err:502 1 0
0 Err:502 1 0
0 Err:502 1 0
0 Err:502 1 0
0 Err:502 1 0
0 Err:502 1 0
0 Err:502 1 0
0 Err:502 1 0
0 Err:502 1 0
0 Err:502 1 0
0 Err:502 1 0
0 Err:502 1 0
0 Err:502 1 0
0 Err:502 1 0
0 Err:502 1 0
0 Err:502 1 0
0 Err:502 1 0
nolles@deped.gov.ph
Computation of Sample
Where
n = 𝑁/ n = sample size
〗 ^2 )
300
= = 171.42857 = 171
1.75
Solve your sample size based on your population. Enter the population size on the blue box provided
P= 60 e= 0.05 e2 = 0.0025
n = 60 60 60
=
1 + 60 0.0025
=
1 + 0.15
=
1.15
= 52
𝑁/( 〖 1+𝑁
𝑒 〗 ^2 )
The higher the population the lesser the percntage of the sample.
Computation of Groups
Steps 1. Arrange the answer sheets of the class from highes to lowest scores
2. For Upper Group count according the number per group from the highest scorer, if the next answer
shet/s have the same score to the last test paper just include in the group.
3 . For the lower groupthe same process from upper group but start counting from the lowest scorer.
4. The number of upper group must be greater than or equal to the number of lower group, if not happen
include the nextscoer/s to the upper group
5. It is advised that if the population is less than 100 include all population, 50% for the upper group and
50% for the lower group. If the last scorer/s for the UG is equal to the top scorer/s of the LG just inclue
all the scores to the UG.
Electronic Template on Identifying Least & Most Learned
Competencies, and Analyzing Test Items
Introduction:
Statistics is a way of looking at a population’s behavior by taking a sample. It’s usually
impossible to survey every member of a population because of money or time. For example, let’s
say you wanted to know how many people in the USA were vegetarians. Think about how long it
would take you to call over 300 million people; Assuming they all had phones and could speak!.
The problems with surveying entire populations are why researchers survey just a fraction of the
population: a sample.
Analysing test items is one of perspective and teacher's skill, that has to be enhanced, to improve
the quality of questions for assessing student's achievement. The skill involves the ability to collect,
summarizing, and applying information from the students' answers to make a judgment in each
assessment
Item analyses are intended to assess and improve the reliability of your tests. If test reliability
is low, test validity will necessarily also be low. This is the ultimate reason you do item analyses—to
improve the validity of a test by improving its reliability. Higher reliability will not necessarily raise
validity (you can be more consistent in hitting the wrong target), but it is a prerequisite. That is, high
reliability is necessary but not sufficient for high validity
One of the problems encountered by the teachers on analyzing est items due to time constraitns and
the difficulty in manipulating formulas if they are going to solve it in excel. . The author try to
develop this electronic tool for the the teachers of the Island Garden City of Samal as an aid for the to
lighten their job especially on mathematics. Thi tool is only an aid for the techers in doing their task
in analyzing test items. It's not the intention of this tool to make teachers lazy or to be dependent of
the result of the output of this tool but the imoprtant is the concepts and methods on how to analyze
test items already learned by them.
Another problem was on taking a sample of the population is sample size. Obviously, if you asked just one
person in the population if they were vegetarian then their answer wouldn’t be representative of everyone. But
would 100 people be sufficient? 1000? Ten thousand? How you figure out a big enough sample size involves
applying a formula. While there are many formulas to calculate sample sizes, most of them require you to
know something about the population, like the mean. But what if you knew nothing about your population?
That’s where Slovin’s formula comes in.
This tool serves as an aid for teachers in analyzing test items. It does not intend to limit their
knowledge and skills. More so, it does not take the place of learning. Teachers need to continue to
learn the basic concepts and practice the methods on how to analyze test items without it.
learn the basic concepts and practice the methods on how to analyze test items without it.
Slovin’s formula gives you a ballpark figure to work with. However, this non-parametric formula lacks
mathematical rigor (Ryan, 2013). For example, there is no way to calculate statistical power (which tells you
how likely your study distinguishes an actual effect from one of chance). It’s unclear from any reference texts
exactly what the “error tolerance” is (a mean, or perhaps a proportion?).
n = Where
n = sample size
𝑁/( 〖 1+𝑁𝑒
N = population size
〗 ^2 )
e = margin of error = .05 (educational)