CANDIDATE ENDORSEMENT SHEET

DATE: 8 March 2022

TO/FOR: Ms Catherine Enteria

We are submitting to your office the application papers and the exam result of:

Name of Applicant Position Applied For COMPENSATION PACKAGE

Basic Salary :
Allowance :
Meal Allowance :
Upon Regularization :

For your further review and comments by accomplishing the attached form and submit to HRD not later
than .

Thank You.

HUMAN RESOURCES

RECOMMENDATION

[X] For interview on April 28, 2009 at 2:00PM.

[ ] Hold for comparison with other applicants.
[ ] Applicant does not meet the division/ department requirements.
[ ] May be considered for contractual employment only for months.
[ ] Please process employment papers with six (6) months probation.
The applicant may start on .

ENDORSED BY: APPROVED BY:

Catherine F. Enteria Ramon S. Fernandez

Department Head President & CEO
*for officer/executive level

Form No. Q-21

 INTERVIEW RATING SHEET

APPLICANT: DATE OF INTERVIEW: April 28,2008

LAST NAME FIRST NAME MI MONTH DAY YEAR

POSITION APPLIED FOR: Regional Manager INTERVIEWER: Catherine F. Enteria

DEPARTMENT: Sales-Metro Manila East

I. APPEARANCE: Consider the total effect of the applicant’s appearance.

How does the applicant’s appearance impress you?

Department Head Division Head

1. Creates an excellent appearance; very likeable person, well-groomed
2. Creates a better than average appearance; good composure and cheerful. x
3. Appearance is ordinary; generally satisfactory
4. Somewhat careless in appearance; self-conscious; timid
5. Make a very poor impression; slovenly unkempt or flashy

II. MANNER OF SPEAKING: Consider the interpersonal skills of the applicant.

Does the applicant express himself/ herself clearly?

How well does s/he convey his/her ideas?

Department Head Division Head
1. Very good expression and speech—clear, forceful, and effective
2. Good expression; talks deliberately and fairly fluent x
3. Average expression; talks fairly ell but not with great fluency
4. Poor expression; tries to express oneself but doesn’t succeed very well, quite vague
5. Very poor expression; finds extreme difficulty in expressing thoughts; rambling and confused

III. PHYSICAL CONDITION: Consider the physical condition of the applicant.

How energetic is the applicant?

Department Head Division Head
1. Full of pep and energy
2. Active; displays more than average vigor and energy x
3. Average amount of activity
4. Quite inactive; looks weak and sickly
5. Very dull and listless

Form No. Q-21

IV. ALERTNESS: Consider the applicants ability to comprehend your questions speedily and anticipate your thoughts. Is there a capacity to
transfer attention from one subject to another quickly? Is there a lag in his/her reaction to your discussions? How
mentally alert is the applicant?
Department Head Division Head
1. Exceptionally keen and quick to understand
2. Fairly quick to grasp questions and new ideas x
3. Normally alert to grasp new ideas
4. Slow to understand subtle points; requires explanation
5. Marked slow in grasping questions; misunderstands meaning of question

V. DISPOSITION: Consider the manner of thinking, behaving, and reacting characteristics of the applicant. How would you rate the
applicant’s disposition?

Department Head Division Head

1. Polite and gracious, tries to show good features, strong determination x
2. Well-poised, faces facts squarely, confident enough to relate with others
3. Acceptable—neither too rough/offensive or overly nice; normal self-confidence
4. Quite indecisive, impatient and hostile but still able to control; somewhat hesitant
5. Outright impatient, impolite, marked feeling of inferiority; very hesitant

VI. INTERPERSONAL RELATIONS: Consider the interpersonal skills of the applicant. Can s/he relate well with others?

Department Head Division Head

1. Extremely Sociable, treats new acquaintances as if they were old friends
2. Friendly and quite expressive, can relate well with others x
3. Quite friendly and expressive of his/her ideas, can react normally
4. Reserved or retiring, a little indifferent
5. Very unfriendly, introvert, unsociable, antagonistic

Form No. Q-21

INTERVIEW RATING SHEET

 FOR APPLICANTS WITH PREVIOUS WORK EXPERIENCE

VII. How good is the applicant’s previous job record?

Department Head Division Head
1. Excellent. Never changed job unless there was a clear and good reason for this x
2. Above average. Usually did not change jobs without clear reason
3. Average. Changes jobs sometimes with a good reason and sometimes without
4. Below Average. Several changes without apparent reasons
5. Poor. Frequent shifting of jobs

VIII. How much initiative is indicated by the applicant’s past work experience?
Has s/he been a self-starter?

Department Head Division Head

1. Excellent. Has a great deal of initiative; has done many things that show real desire to get
ahead.
2. Above average. Has considerable initiative but only when certain interests are involved x
3. Average. About as apt to go ahead; performance variable without reasonable grounds
4. Below average. Lacking initiative; but has shown some once or twice
5. Poor. Practically has no initiative; has done little or nothing on his/her own

REMARKS:
Applicant possesses the maturity level necessary in dealing with agents. Has a very good
disposition.

SIGNATURE OF INTERVIEWERS:

Catherine F. Enteria
Department Head Date

Ramon S. Fernandez
President & CEO Date

Form No. Q-21