This document outlines the marking rubric for an individual assignment on an international employment law case. It evaluates students on their knowledge and understanding of the case, analysis of issues, clarity and organization, and proper formatting. Top scores are given for thorough understanding and discussion of issues, in-depth and persuasive arguments, logical structure, and correct citation of sources. Satisfactory scores require identification of most issues and attempts at clear organization and arguments. Unsatisfactory work shows poor comprehension, insufficient analysis, incoherent structure, and incorrect citations.
This document outlines the marking rubric for an individual assignment on an international employment law case. It evaluates students on their knowledge and understanding of the case, analysis of issues, clarity and organization, and proper formatting. Top scores are given for thorough understanding and discussion of issues, in-depth and persuasive arguments, logical structure, and correct citation of sources. Satisfactory scores require identification of most issues and attempts at clear organization and arguments. Unsatisfactory work shows poor comprehension, insufficient analysis, incoherent structure, and incorrect citations.
This document outlines the marking rubric for an individual assignment on an international employment law case. It evaluates students on their knowledge and understanding of the case, analysis of issues, clarity and organization, and proper formatting. Top scores are given for thorough understanding and discussion of issues, in-depth and persuasive arguments, logical structure, and correct citation of sources. Satisfactory scores require identification of most issues and attempts at clear organization and arguments. Unsatisfactory work shows poor comprehension, insufficient analysis, incoherent structure, and incorrect citations.
Student name : ________________________________________________________________ Intake : _____________________________________
Criteria Outstanding Good Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Marks
Knowledge & The essay demonstrates The essay demonstrates good The essay demonstrates The essay demonstrates understanding thorough understanding of understanding of the case; satisfactory understanding poor understanding of the case; where the issues where the issues were of the case; where some of the case; where the were comprehensively identified and discussed. (6%) the issues were identified student fails to identify identified and discussed. and discussed. (4%) or discuss most of the (8%) issues. (2%) Analysis The essay is well researched, The essay is competently The essay shows some The essay shows showing in-depth analysis, researched, showing good research and analysis of limited research and with arguments that are clear analysis, with arguments that the issues; with attempts to insufficient analysis; and persuasive. (8%) are reasonably clear and construct logical and where the arguments persuasive. (6%) persuasive arguments. are poorly constructed. (4%) (2%) Clarity & The structure and The structure and organization The structure and The structure and coherence organization of the essay is of the essay is reasonably organization of the essay is organization of the systematic and logical. The coherent. The essay is satisfactory. The writing is essay is incoherent or writing is clear and concise. generally well written. (6%) difficult to follow in parts. confusing. The essay is (8%) (4%) poorly written and difficult to follow. (2%) Presentation, Minimal errors in grammar, Occasional lapses in Some lapses in grammar, Frequent lapses in footnoting & spelling or punctuation. Full grammar, spelling or spelling or punctuation. grammar, spelling or referencing and accurate citation of punctuation. Authorities and Some missing, incomplete punctuation. authorities and sources. (6%) sources are generally cited or incorrect citations of Unsatisfactory citation correctly. (4.5%) authorities and sources. of authorities and (3%) sources. (1.5%)