Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ALYA FAUZIYYAH
NIM. 1610117320004
TABLE OF CONTENTS..................................................................................................2
Contents..............................................................................................................................2
CHAPTER I.......................................................................................................................1
INTRODUCTION..............................................................................................................1
1.1 Background of The Study...................................................................................1
1.2 Research Problem....................................................................................................2
1.3 Objective of the Research........................................................................................3
1.4 Scope and Limitation of the study..........................................................................3
1.5 Significance of the Research....................................................................................3
1.6 Research Hypothesis................................................................................................4
CHAPTER II......................................................................................................................5
REVIEW OF LITERATURE...........................................................................................5
2.1 Teaching Speaking...................................................................................................5
2.1.1 Nature of Speaking............................................................................................5
2.1.2 Micro- and Macro-skills of Speaking...............................................................5
2.2.3 Principles of Designing Speaking Techniques................................................7
2.2 Theories of Dubbing.................................................................................................8
2.2.1 Definition of Dubbing........................................................................................8
2.2.2 Techniques of Dubbing......................................................................................9
2.2.3 Terms for Being a Dubber.................................................................................9
2.2.4 Basic Exercise Becomes a Dubber..................................................................10
2.2.5 Procedure of Dubbing.....................................................................................11
2.2.6 Advantages of the Technique of Dubbing......................................................12
CHAPTER III..................................................................................................................13
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY...................................................................................13
3.1 Research Design......................................................................................................13
3.2 Population, Sampling and Sample........................................................................14
3.1.1 Population........................................................................................................14
3.1.2 Sampling...........................................................................................................15
3.1.3 Sample...............................................................................................................15
3.3 Variable...................................................................................................................16
3.4 Research Instrument..............................................................................................16
2
3.5 Data Collecting Method.........................................................................................17
3.5.1 Pre-test..............................................................................................................17
3.5.2 Post-test.............................................................................................................18
3.6 Validity and Reliability..........................................................................................18
3.6.1 Validity.............................................................................................................18
3.6.2 Reliability.........................................................................................................22
3.7 Data Collection.......................................................................................................23
3.8 Data Analysis..........................................................................................................24
REFERENCES.................................................................................................................26
3
CHAPTER I
INTRODUCTION
1
English as a target language in the classroom. As an example in University of
Lambung Mangkurat, it develops an English program at Faculty of Teacher
Training where the main purpose is to prepare students to be a competent English
teacher. Afterward, teachers also need to provide an appropriate teaching method
and media to provoke the students speaking skill.
Film Dubbing utilizes authentic film clips, with which learners dub the
voices of muted characters (Chiu, 2012). VD is much different with role plays as
the students have to perform from beginning until the end. Dubbing is filling a
conversation or speech and students tried became a dubber, so it can made
students improve their ability in speaking English language and implementation
dubbing in process of learning made students interested to study. On the other
hand, the process of video dubbing is a time-consuming which may takes hour to
record the audio and match to the video.
The general objective of this study is to find out the use of Dubbing Video
2
Technique for Improving Students Speaking Skill and Confidence of Student’s.
This research focuses on the implementation of video dubbing project and to find
out the improvement of the students’ speaking skill after the implementation of video
dubbing project in teaching speaking of Student’s University of English Language
Education of Lambung Mangkurat University.
1. The teacher
The result of this study is expected to be useful input for English teachers
2. English students
The result of this research could become a reference for some English
students and give an opportunity for students to get learning and solve
3. Further researcher
They can get references and other information from this research. So, they
3
1.6 Research Hypothesis
experimental class and control class after giving video dubbing project in teaching
Mangkurat University.
2. Alternative Hypothesis :
control class after giving video dubbing project in teaching speaking of Student’s
4
CHAPTER II
REVIEW OF LITERATURE
Spratt et. al (2005) defines speaking as a productive skill. It involves using speech to
express meaning to other people. Speaking is defined operationally in this study as the ability
of English students to speak English appropriately in a given meaningful context to serve
both transactional and interactional purposed using correct pronunciation and grammar.
Nunan (2003) agrees with Spratt et.al that speaking is a productive oral skill which consists
of producing systematic verbal utterances to convey meaning. Brown (2004) also adds that
speaking is a productive skill in the organs of speech to express meaning which can be
directly and empirically observed.
In addition, related to speaking ability, Nunan (2003) states that speaking ability is the ability
of the speaker to convey information, express ideas, thoughts feeling and reaction, in
appropriate structure, speech sound, and sound pattern, appropriate vocabulary, according to
situation and subject matter and used the language quickly and confidently. It can be
concluded that speaking ability is a skill, which is communicating the speech sound for
expressing and conveying a messages or ideas. The ability to speak a language is the same as
knowing a language since speaking is the most basic means of the human communication.
Speaking as well as other skills has a list of various components. The purpose is to serve
taxonomy of skills from which the teacher will select one or several that become the
objectives for the students to acquire effective speaking strategies. Those are micro-skills and
macro-skills.
1) Micro-Skills
The micro-skills refer to producing the smaller chunks of language such as phonemes,
morphemes, words, collocations, and phrasal units (Brown, 2004: 142). The students have to
orally produce the different English phonemes and allophonic variants; produce chunks of
5
language of different length; produce English stress patterns, words in stress and unstressed
positions, rhythmic structure, and intonation contours; produce reduced forms of words and
phrases; use an adequate number of lexical units (words) in order to accomplish pragmatic
purposes; produce fluent speech at different rates of delivery; monitor their own oral
production and use various strategic devices- pauses, fillers, self-corrections, backtracking-
to enhance the clarity of the message; use grammatical word classes (nouns, verbs, etc.),
systems (e.g., tense, agreement, and pluralisation), word order, patterns, rules, and elliptical
forms; produce speech in natural constituents – in appropriate phrases, pause groups, breath
groups, and sentences; express a particular meaning in different grammatical forms; use
cohesive devices in spoken discourse.
2) Macro-Skills
The macro-skills imply the speaker’s focus on the larger elements such as fluency,
discourse, function, style, cohesion, nonverbal communication, and strategic options (Brown,
2004: 143). The students have to accomplish appropriately communicative functions
according to situations, participants, and goals; use appropriate registers, implicates,
pragmatic conventions, and other sociolinguistic features in face-to-face conversations; covey
links and connections between events and communicate such relations as main idea,
supporting idea, new information, given information, generalization, and exemplification; use
facial features, kinaesthetic, body language, and other nonverbal cues along with verbal
language to convey meanings; and develop and use a battery of speaking strategies, such as
emphasizing key words, rephrasing, providing a context for interpreting the meaning of
words, appealing for help, and accurately assessing how well your interlocutor is
understanding you.
Van Ek and Trim (1998) explain six categories of language-functions for threshold level.
The first is imparting and seeking information. This category includes reporting (describing
and narrating), correcting, asking, and answering question. The second is expressing and
finding out attitudes. This category includes expressing agreement and disagreement;
expressing about pleasure, happiness, displeasure, unhappiness; expressing likes and dislikes;
expressing about satisfaction/dissatisfaction; expressing surprise/lack of surprise. The third is
deciding on course of action (suasion) includes expressing hope, disappointment, fear,
gratitude; reacting to an expression of gratitude; offering and accepting of apology;
expressing about approval/disapproval.
6
The fourth is for socializing. This category includes attracting attention; greeting people
when meeting a friend or acquaintance; replying to a greeting from a friend or acquaintance;
and addressing a friend or acquaintance; addressing a stranger. The fifth is structuring
discourse includes asking someone’s opinion; showing that one is following a person’s
discourse; interrupting; asking someone to be silent; giving over the floor; indicating a wish
to continue; encouraging someone to continue; indicating that one is coming to an end;
closing; and telephone opening. The last is communication repair includes signalling
understanding/non-understanding; asking for repetition of sentence; and paraphrasing.
One of the implications of the list is the importance of focusing on both the forms and
functions of language. In teaching speaking, the teacher does not limit students’ attention to
the whole picture but he/she also help students to see the small parts of language that make
up the whole. As the teacher plans a specific technique, such a list helps the teacher to focus
on clearly conceptualized objectives. The teacher can select one or several from the list as the
objective to teach speaking to the students and to assess their speaking ability.
7
The meaningful interaction is important to encourage the students’
willingness to speak in the target language. The teacher can find some
help from teacher resource to devise authentic contexts and meaningful
interaction.
4) Provide appropriate feedback and correction.
Since the most EFL students are totally dependent on the teacher for
useful linguistic feedback, the teacher should give correct feedback that
are appropriately for the moment.
5) Capitalize on the natural link between speaking
and listening.
As the teacher perhaps focusing on the speaking goals, listening may
naturally precede. Skills in producing language are often initiated
through comprehension. The teacher should not lose out on
opportunities to integrate the two skills.
6) Give students opportunities to initiate oral
communication.
It means that the activities should give a lot of opportunities for the
students to initiate the target language. When design and use speaking
techniques, teacher should have allowed students to initiate language.
8
English in Indonesia is a foreign language. Related to this,
students learn the target language (English) in their own culture and the
available practices or activities in the classroom. The key factor in the
English learning development is the opportunity given to students to
speak in the target language. Teachers must improve the students’
willingness and give them reason to speak. Amir Hassanpour explains
dubbing or voiceover is the replacement of dialogue and narration of a
foreign language or the source language into the language used by the
viewer. According to Zatlin, Ph., (2005), Theatrical Translation and Film
Adaptation: A Practitioner’s View that explains dubbing is replacing the
source language (foreign language concerned) with the target language.
Dubbing is the post-production process of recording and replacing voices
on a motion picture or television soundtrack subsequent to the original
shooting. The term most commonly refers to the substitution of the
voices of the actors shown on the screen by those of different
performers, who may be speaking a different language remains in use to
enable the screening of audio-visual material to a mass audience in
countries where viewers do not speak the same language as the original
performers.
Preparation of mouth motion with sound files that already, so that the
author simply adjusts the motion of the mouth with a voice that already
exists.
9
2.2.3 Terms for Being a Dubber
There are terms for being a dubber such as:
1. Character
A dubber before playing role, he must know the character of the player and a
dubber should be able to distinguish one character to the other players.
2. Manage Emotions
A dubber must have technique manage emotion because technics emotions can take the
example of the exercise when the figure was angry, happy or sad.
3. Lip-synchronization
Hassanpour said that the lip-synchronization is one of the requirements that must be con-
sidered in the process of dubbing. To make it look natural, as much as possible the words
which are used in accordance with the motion of the lips or actors and actresses whose
voice was replaced.
4. Improvisation
In doing basic exercise become as a dubber, the students can train their speaking
and intonation related to fluency. There are two basic exercises becomes a dubber
as follow:
a. Vocal Exercise
Vocal exercises are necessary for sound to be honed properly and have high
weight or quality. To be able to have good vocals we have to qualify the volume,
1. Volume means our voice must have power or weight. We must dare to sound,
10
clearly not like gargling
3. Catching is that we must be able to determine exactly when we cut off a long
dialogue.
4. The intonation that we should be able to set when we have to say high when to
5. Voice color is we have to find what kind of sound is right to turn on or fill it the
given role.
a. Flavor
The sense of feeling is processing our inner in order to appreciate the role given so
felt sad, happy and others and how we can feel it again.
that we can know the habits of life, the view of his life so that
11
when we play a character like that we can turn or play a figure like That
The use of Media in process learning is very important because it will make
students become interested in study. There are many media can used in learning such
as video with technique dubbing. Applying video with technique dubbing is another
a. Students viewed overall video so that they understand the story of its
d. Recorded from students enter into the video that already become
12
CHAPTER III
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
13
University.
This study used quasi experimental design. The researcher chose this design is to
determine the validity of conclusion can be drawn from the study. There are many kinds of
experimental research, such as pre – experimental, randomized experimental or quasi –
experimental (Ary, 2002:302). This study used quasi experimental design in the form of two
groups. One control group and one group experiment group with pre-test-post-test design
within quantitative approach. This design can be used to compare the results between pre-
test and post-test. The medium will be used dubbing video for experimental class and
control group will be taught through conventional teaching. After that, both groups were
given post-test to measure students’ achievement.
In this study, the procedures of quasi experimental research that use Two-Group
Pre-test-Post-test design are:
14
1. Administering a pre-test measuring speaking achievement of the
students of English Language Education of Lambung Mangkurat
University.
3.2.1 Population
There are some explanations about the meaning of population. Population defines
as a group of element or case, whether individual, objects, or events that confirm to
specific criteria and to which intend to generalize the result of the research (James H,
2001:125).
The small group that is observed is called a sample, and the large group about which
the generalization is made is called a population. Population is defined as all members of
any well-defined class of people. Event or objects (Ary et al, 2002:138). Population is used
more generally; it refers to any collection of entities, of whatever kind, that is the object that
have certain characteristics and it becomes the source data that is used by researcher in the
study. The population of this research is the fourth semester students of English Languge
Education who take Advanced Speaking class. They are two groups into A1 and A2
where each class consists of 30 students. The total number of populations is 60 students.
15
3.2.2 Sampling
Practically, there are some of reasons why the researcher chooses the class. First,
the class has average proficiency on speaking based on the English teacher there.
Second, the English teacher gives an official instruction to the researcher due to choose
the class as a sample of this research among another class. Based on the English lecturer
in English Language Education of Lambung Mangkurat University.
3.2.3 Sample
16
3.3 Variable
An instrument was needed to collect the data. In order to collect data for research,
the researcher used some methods and instruments. Instrument of the research played an
important role in research project. The instrument was used to achieve the accuracy of
the data and it can indicate that the researcher was successful in this research.
The instrument that was used in this study is speaking test that was developed based
on syllabus that the teacher used in the faculty. By the test, the researcher supposed to
assess students speaking achievement. Test in simple term, a method of measuring a
person’s ability, knowledge, or performance in a given domain. The researcher applied
pre-test and post-test. Pre-test was taken before doing an experimental study or before
teaching by pre-test was aimed to measure the students preliminary their speaking
knowledge and achievement before they entered the experimental circle. After getting
the result of pre-test, the researcher gave treatment to teach speaking for all the students
in treatment class by using dubbing movies and no treatment but traditional way for
control class.
After doing treatment, the researcher gave post-test to all students. Post- test was
taken after doing an experimental study or after teaching by using dubbing video
technique. Post-test was used to know the students speaking after taught by using
dubbing video technique. The researcher wanted to know how far the students can speak
17
when treatment was on progress. Apparently, the result of the test showed that the
students speaking mastery improved significantly compare to those who do not receive
treatment.
Data collecting method is the method that is used by the researcher to collect data.
Data collecting is systematic and standardized procedure to obtain the necessary data
(Tanzeh, 2009:57). If the data are wrong, the result of research will not be valid; a good
data collecting methods should be applied. Methodology is a way used by researcher in
order to collecting data in order to easier the research and better result in short the data
is more accurate, more completed, and more systematically so that it will be easier to be
analyzed.
Data is a note of fact or information that will be processed in the research activity.
Arikunto (2006), data is a whole fact and number that can be used as material for
arranging information is used as need. The data are very significant in the research. The
research cannot get information without the data. The data of this research were
students of English Language Education of Lambung Mangkurat University in the form
of speaking test which were divided into two group, treatment class and control class,
pre-test and post-test.
After the researcher got permission from lecturer, the researcher started collecting
data. The researcher gave test for experimental group using dubbing video technique.
Applying the test, the students were tested to perform their speaking. The test was
in the form of telling story to measure achievement of an individual.
18
a movie and asked the students to listen and watch. The researcher asked the students to
see what was happened on this movie, about place and about moral value. The
researcher asked the students‟ assumption in front of the class for maximum 3 minutes.
When the students‟ show their performance, the researcher recorded them and made the
score.
3.5.2 Post-test
In this study, post-test was administered after doing the experimental research study
to treatment class. Post- test is a measure taken after the experimental treatment has
been applied. Post-test was used to measure students‟ ability after treatment process to
know their knowledge after they got treatment for treatment class and after taught by
traditional way for control class. It was done to know the final score and to know the
students difference competence before and after they get treatment. The process of post-
test is same with the process in pre-test.
3.6.1 Validity
19
validity of the test.
1) Content Validity
To make the test valid, the researcher used content validity. This kind of validity
depends on careful analysis of the language being tested and the particular treatment
activity. The test should be constructed to contain representative sample because the
relevancy of the objective and the content of the test items showed the content validity
of the test. The test is said to have content validity if its contents constitutes a
representative sample of language skill, structure etc. being tested (Ida Isnawati,
2013:27). Therefore, the test used in this research to fulfill the content validity of
speaking.
The content validity in this research can be shown as bellow:
20
nique
Based on the table above, the test had content validity because of there is
appropriateness between the test and the purpose and indicator. In order to obtain the
validity of the test, the researcher used content validity by showing that the content of the
test was a representative sample of the domain that was to be tested (Fulcher and
Davidson, 2007: 6). For this, the grammar, vocabulary, and functional contents of the test
were selected on the basis of the course syllabus. In addition, the test had proper to the
syllabus in the fourth semester students of English Language Education of Lambung
Mangkurat University
1) Construct Validity
A test said to have construct validity if it can be demonstrated that it measures just
the ability which is supposed to measure. The word construct refers to any underlying
ability which is hypothesized in a theory of language learning. Brown (2004:25)
mentioned that a construct is any theory, hypothesis of model that attempts to explain
observed phenomena in our universe or perception.
According to Brown (2004:172-173), the aspects of speaking consist of five items:
Grammar, Vocabulary, Comprehension, Fluency, and Pronunciation. Those 5 aspects
should be used as the criteria of good speaking. In this research, the speaking test also
used the 5 criteria above as the aspects of good speaking. The researcher asked the
students to speak for 5 minutes based on the topic.
The criterion of success of the students speaking ability adapted and modified from
Rubistar. They as follow:
CATEGORY 4 3 2 1
21
Fluency Speaks clearly Speaks clearly Speaks clearly Often mumbles
and distinctly and distinctly and distinctly or
all (100- 95%) all (100- 95%) most (94- cannot be
the time, and the time, but 85%) of the understood OR
mispronounces mispronounces time. mispronounces
no words. one word. Mispronounces more than one
no more than word.
one word.
Vocabulary Uses Uses Uses Uses several (5
vocabulary vocabulary vocabulary or more) words
appropriate for appropriate for appropriate for or
the audience. the audience. the audience. phrases that
Extends Includes 1- 2 Does
are not
Audience words that not
vocabulary by might be new Include any understood by
2)Face validity
22
A test called to have face validity if it looks as if it measures what is supposed to
measure (Hughes, 1989:33). In this research, the test given to the students to measure
speaking achievement especially used dubbing video technique. A test that does not
have face validity may rejected by the validator, advisor, and the teacher. Another
explanation said that face validity refers to the extent to which examinees believe that
the instrument is measure what it is expected to measure (Ary, 2010:228). The example
of face validity, a test which pretended to measure students speaking achievement but
which did not required the test take to read might be thought lack of face validity.
In this research, the researcher used face validity by consulting with the expert as a
validator. After that the test has some view point that makes it reliable in the face
validity such as; the instruction is each section have to understandable for the students,
the question must not be ambiguity to make students able to answer it, the time
allocation is appropriate for students who have to finish the test punctually.
3.6.1 Reliability
Fraenkel (2012) stated that reliability is the consistency of score obtained. A reliable
test is consistent and dependable. Thus, if the students are given the same test on two differ-
ent occasions, the test should yield similar result and the more similar the score are, the
more reliable the test is. The test of try out through interview between the researcher with
ten students. The researcher showed some pictures to students and then the researcher asked
students to tell about the story based on each picture. Then, the researcher made score from
the result of interview. Besides that, the test was evaluated by the teacher after it was de-
veloped. Finally, try out is also done by the researcher.
It was found out that the results were similar. The scores were then subjected to the
23
Pearson’s Product Moment statistic to find the reliability of the test items.
or
To test the significance of Correlation Product Moment, in addition to using the r table, the
researcher can also use the t test, with the formula:
While the conclusion criteria for the two-sided test are as follows:
24
– If t count is between -t table and t table, then rxy is not significant
This section discusses about the technique of collecting data that is the way used
to collect the needed data. The data will be collected from these students using a test as
instruments. The test will be done in both experimental and control classes with pre-test
and post-test. The test result of each experimental class and control class are calculated
after the test is given. Based on the score from pretest and post-test, the researcher would
like to conduct a statistic test about “The effectiveness of dubbing movie strategies on
Tulungagung”.
technique to analyze and count the data. It means that the technique of quantitative
data analysis is the process of data shaped by number. In this study, the researcher
used the quantitative data to know the students achievement in speaking after they
are taught by using dubbing movies as a media in teaching speaking. the researcher
analyzed the result of the test after collecting the data by using an oral test. The
result of the test was processed by comparing the data before and after treatment by
t-test. But before, the researcher has to make sure the result pass the normality
25
1. Normality Test
After the researcher got the result of the pre-test and post-test, the result
has to pass normality testing. In statistics, normality tests are used to determine
2. Homogeneity Test
3. T-Test
(2007:543), the t-test assumes that one variable is categorical (e.g., males and
The researcher in this study used the formula of T-test to analyses the
data to know the result of students‟ test which are conducted before and after
doing treatment. The data were analyzed using the following of t-test (Ary et al,
2002:162).
effectiveness and to get stronger conclusion. The t-test was taken from result of
students‟ test which was conducted before and after doing treatment or taught
26
REFERENCES
Social Networking.
Amalia, Kiki. 2018. Improving the Students’ Speaking Skill through Video Dubbing at the
Eleventh Grade of Private Islamic Senior High School Amaliyah Sunggal in 2018/2019
Academic Year.
Iin. 2017. The Use of Dubbing to Improve Students’ Speaking Ability at MA PESANTREN
Merdeka Wati, Indria., & Rozimela, Yenni. 2019. The Use Of Dubbing Video Technique For
Improving Students Speaking Skill and Confidence of Senior High School Students.
27
Mustikawati, Arum. 2013. The Effectiveness of Using Video in Teaching Speaking For the
Nur Rokani, Rizki. 2018. The Effectiveness of Dubbing Movie Strategy on Students‟
Speaking Ability at the Second Grade of MA AT-TOHIRIYAH Ngantru Tulungagung.
Setyo, Irene Apriliana. 2020. Improving Students’ Speaking Skill by Using English Video at
Zuny Mandasari, Vivy. 2014. Improving Students’ Speaking Skill Through Video Dubbing.
28