The document discusses competency analysis which describes jobs in terms of measurable behaviors that employees need to perform jobs well. It explains that competencies can be generic, functional, threshold, or differentiating. The document also provides examples of how to extract competencies by relating behaviors to skills and defining levels of competency achievement.
The document discusses competency analysis which describes jobs in terms of measurable behaviors that employees need to perform jobs well. It explains that competencies can be generic, functional, threshold, or differentiating. The document also provides examples of how to extract competencies by relating behaviors to skills and defining levels of competency achievement.
The document discusses competency analysis which describes jobs in terms of measurable behaviors that employees need to perform jobs well. It explains that competencies can be generic, functional, threshold, or differentiating. The document also provides examples of how to extract competencies by relating behaviors to skills and defining levels of competency achievement.
Human Resource Management Group IIM Kozhikode Email: spp@iimk.ac.in Date: 14.01.2015
[This lecture has borrowed material from multiple sources. To be revealed
on demand]. What is Competency? If a person X is doing a job, then he should do A B C in order for us to say he is doing job well
• Competency based analysis means describing a job in terms of
measurable, observable, behaviours, that an employee doing the job must exhibit to do the job well. • “Experienced easiness in variability of skills according to demands in the job” • Since organizatons operate in fast changing environment, employees and their jobs need to absorb the uncertainty. Thus varied teams, multple roles (leader, technician, administrator, supporter etc.) are the norms. • Hence instead of being ‘boxed’ to a job, competency based job analysis encourages employees to develop role based behaviours [by skills, knowledge, abilites]. • People can be shifted across roles, across domains, across functons • Example – Infosys Technologies has completely revamped itself to a role based organizaton, identfying skills and behaviours at every positon. – (Show e.g.) • Types of competencies – Generic competencies • Managerial and cognitve competencies required in small and large measure across functons [customer satsfacton, analytcal skills] – Functonal competencies • Competencies that are required in small or large measure within specific functons. [project planning, resource planning for project management] – Threshold competencies • Characteristcs which any job holder needs to have to do the job effectvely – but do not distnguish an average from a superior performer [language skills, computer skills] – Differentatng competencies • Competencies that superior performers possess, but absent in average performers [empathy, ability to scan environment for opportunites] How to extract competencies? [Fundamental of competency mapping] • Step 1: Conduct JD • Step 2: Co-relate each behaviour to a skill • Step 3: Measure each skill in a Likert scale • Step 4: Define each point/number by demonstratve behaviour How to extract competencies? [Fundamental of competency mapping] • Competencies of faculty member – Teaching and learning skills • 1: Basic (Just lectures a prepared presentaton) • 2: Average (Invites selected questons in class, but does not go beyond the scope) • 3: Good (Demonstrates the applicatons of concepts in class by discussions) • 4: Excellent (Challenges the students to critque the concepts) – Communicaton skills • 1: Basic (Speaks at a single place in the class) • 2: Average (Moves around, makes eye contact with students) • 3: Good (Moves around, makes eye contact and encourages frequent dialogues) • 4: Excellent (Moves around, makes eye contact, teaches through discussion) • Competencies for IIM Profs. – Competency 1: Research, Analysis and Interpretaton • Defn: Shows evidence of informaton richness and clear analytcal thinking. Gets to heart of complex problems and issues. Applies own expertse effectvely • Underdeveloped (0): Frequently presents unsupported statements. Unable to formulate a reasoned argument. Can never think fast enough to find facts to support one’s argument. Ineffectvely infers unrelated conclusions from presented data. • Moderately developed (1): Although contributes little informaton to the group for discussion, yet makes the best use of presented informaton to derive logical inferences. • Superiorly developed (2): Presents statements that follow a clear logical pathway. Presents supported statements/data. Is deft in interpretng alternatve meanings from presented data. • Competencies for IIM Profs – Competency 2: Interacton and presentaton • Defn: Communicates and networks effectvely. Successfully persuades and influences others. Relates to others in confident and relaxed manner • Underdeveloped (0): Finds difficulty in arguing an idea. • Moderately developed (1): Is not focused on a single idea. Changes ideas to suit the mood of group. Aim is to make himself/herself acceptable than the idea. • Superiorly developed (2): Likes his/her ideas and argues enthusiastcally to get them accepted • Competencies for IIM Profs – Competency 3: Creaton and conceptualizaton – Defn: Openness to new ideas and experiences. Thinks broadly and seeks out learning opportunity – Underdeveloped (0): Limited demonstraton of ability of integraton of ideas, informaton and perspectves. – Moderately developed (1): Is only capable of summarizing ideas. However it does not result in any change in the directon or nature of discussion – Superiorly developed (2): Proactvely builds on others’ ideas and integrates varied informaton to give a new directon to the discussion. • Competencies for IIM Profs. – Competency: Technological familiarity – Defn: Aptness with modern technology and awareness of usage – Underdeveloped (0): Is unable to appreciate and incorporate technological infrastructure into his pedagogy. – Moderately developed (1): Is comfortable incorporatng at least 50% of the technological infrastructure in his pedagogy. However is resistant to learning of new technological infrastructure. – Superiorly developed (2): Is apt in using every bit of technological infrastructure available in his/her pedagogy. Is enthusiastc to learn additonal features. Is passionate about staying up to date in the same. • Problems with competency analysis – Focus on behaviours and not results – Competency is loosely interpreted and is subjectve