Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Digos College
Correctional Administration
Non-Institutional
Correction
Ms. Lalaine dela Peña Madanlo
Historical Background of Probation
Forerunners of Probation
Benefit of Clergy
The earliest device for softening brutal
punishment.
In the trial, no evidence against the
prisoner was presented by the King.
The defendant purged himself by
compurgators or witnesses testifying to his
truthfulness, and was usually acquitted, or if
found guilty by a jury of 12 clerks he was
“degraded and put to penance.”
Non-Institutional Correction
Historical Background of Probation
Forerunners of Probation
Judicial Reprieve
Temporary withholding of sentence,
much used by early English Judges.
Non-Institutional Correction
Historical Background of Probation
Forerunners of Probation
Recognizance
- Binding over for good behavior.
- Direct ancestor of probation.
- It originated as a measure of
preventive justice, involving an
obligation or promise, sworn to under
court order by a person not yet
convicted but thought likely from the
information before the court to commit
a crime, that he would “keep the
peace” and “be of good behavior.”
Non-Institutional Correction
Non-Institutional Correction
Probation History
Early Probation and John Augustus
Concept of Probation:
Evolved out of the practice of judicial reprieve.
Used in English Courts to
serve as a temporary
suspension of sentence.
Suspended sentence
Courts were
using judicial 1830 - Used in
reprieve to Boston, USA
suspend 19th Release on
sentences Century recognizance or bail.
Non-Institutional Correction
Probation History
Early Probation and John Augustus
Courts were “A judge had always had
using judicial the power to suspend a
reprieve to sentence, if he felt for some
suspend reason that the trial had
sentences. miscarried. But could judges
suspend sentences
The power to wholesale, after trials that
suspend sentence were scrupulously fair, simply
was inherent in to give the defendant a
criminal courts only second chance?”
when this right had 1894
been granted by Court
the legislature. rulings: Litigated in New York
Non-Institutional Correction
Probation History
Early Probation and John Augustus
1916 The US Supreme Court, in a
case that affected only federal
John Augustus courts, ruled that judges did not
Pioneer of have the discretionary authority
Probation to suspend a sentence.
He applied the term The Congress could
probation in the authorize the temporary
practice of bailing or indefinite suspension
offenders out of court of sentence.
followed by a period A predecessor to
of supervised living in probation statutes.
the community.
Non-Institutional Correction
Probation History
Early Probation Statutes
1878
1880
1894
1897
1898
Non-Institutional Correction
Probation History
Early Probation Statutes
1880
1894 Maryland
Authorized its courts to suspend a
1897 sentence generally or for a
1898 specific time, and judges could
“make such order to enforce
terms as to costs, recognizance
for appearance, or matters
relating to the residence or
conduct of the convicts as may
be deemed proper.
Non-Institutional Correction
Probation History
Early Probation Statutes
1878
1880
1894
1897 Missouri
Enacted a “bench parole
1898 law”, which authorized courts
to suspend sentence under
certain conditions. The courts
also appointed probation
officers.
Non-Institutional Correction
Probation History
1878 Early Probation Statutes
1880
1894
1897 The second state to
1898 adopt probation
Vermont Authorized the appointment
of a probation officer by the
courts in each county, each
officer serving all the courts
in a particular county.
Non-Institutional Correction
Probation History
1878 Early Probation Statutes
1880
1894
1897
1898
Rhode Island
It place restrictions on who could be
granted probation, excluding persons
convicted of treason, murder,
robbery, arson, rape and burglary.
Non-Institutional Correction
Probation History
Probation at the Turn of the Century
1899 1913
1901 1919
1903 1925
1907 1939
1908 1956
Non-Institutional Correction
Probation History
Probation at the Turn of the Century
1901
1903
1913
1907
1919
1908
1925
1939
1956
Non-Institutional Correction
Probation History
Probation at the Turn of the Century
1899 Minnesota
Enacted a law that authorized
1901 by the appointment of county
1903 probation officers, but the
granting of probation was 1913
1907 limited to those 18 years of age.
1919
1908 After 4 years, it was changed to
21 years. 1925
1939
1956
Non-Institutional Correction
Probation History
Probation at the Turn of the Century
County
State Juvenile Federal
Municipal State combined
Non-Institutional Correction
Probation History
Administration of Probation
Juvenile
County State Federal
Municipal State combined
Non-Institutional Correction
Probation History
Administration of Probation
Federal
County State Juvenile
Municipal State combined
Non-Institutional Correction
Probation History
Administration of Probation
Municipal
County State Juvenile
Federal State combined
Non-Institutional Correction
Probation History
Administration of Probation
Richard McSweeney
The first salaried federal probation
officer appointed in the District of
Massachusetts, and the second and third
officers followed shortly thereafter .
Non-Institutional Correction
Historical Background of Probation
Noted Probation Personalities in the United
States
Margaret Staehli
In 1932, the first female officer
worked as a county probation officer, gave
up the title to enter the federal system in the
District of Minnesota as a clerk typist in 1931
when there was no authority to hire more
officers, and then became the first woman
named as a federal probation officer the
following year.
Non-Institutional Correction
Historical Background of Probation
Noted Probation Personalities in the United
States
Non-Institutional Correction
Historical Background of Probation
Noted Probation Personalities in the United
States
Killits Decision
In 1916, before probation was a
sentencing option in the federal courts, some
judges - including Judge John M. Killits of the
Northern District of Ohio, were, in effect,
granting probation” by suspending sentences
indefinitely until the Supreme Court, in Ex parte
United States, 242 U.S. 27 (1916), known as the
Killits decision, held that federal courts had no
inherent power to suspend sentence indefinitely
and suggested probation legislation as a
remedy.
Non-Institutional Correction
Probation in Other Countries
Probation System Difference
USA Similar Sentence Investigation
Canada concepts Each province & territory
England policies Each state has its own
Philippines objectives Variance in Probation Act
procedure
convicted and
Trial Judge requires more
sentenced
information on the
apply for probation
offender before reaching
Trial Judge orders PO a decision regarding
to conduct PSI - PSI sentencing
Report orders PO to conduct PSI
National and local offender is remanded in or
application out of custody