You are on page 1of 6

Name: James Vincent E. Dauz.

Subject: SSE18 (cm1)

Course/Year: BSEd-Social Studies 3 Aristotle. Teacher: Mr. Phillip Fedillaga

KNOWLEDGE BUILDING

Assessment Task 1: Identification Table

Laws and articles Rights Duties/Responsibility


Code of ethics for The rights to be The rights to be free of mandatory
professional free of mandatory assignments that are not related to
teachers: Rights assignments that their duties as defined in their
and Duties are not related to appointments or employment
their contract of contracts, if compensated
duties accordingly, in accordance with the
applicable laws.
Republic Act No. 4670
Also known as the “Magna carta for
public school teachers”. This was
approved on june 18, 1986 to
promote and improve the social and
economic status of public school
teachers, their living and working
conditions, their employment and
career prospects.. this includes all
public school teachers except those
in the professorial staff of state
colleges and universities.
Code of ethics for The right to II. THE EDUCATIONAL
professional intellectual COMMUNITY Chapter 2 Rights
teachers: Rights property. Section 11
and Duties The right to the intellectual property
that is in an accordance with existing
laws.
Code of ethics for Right as a person of II. THE EDUCATIONAL
professional Authority COMMUNITY
teachers: Rights
and Duties Chapter 2 Rights Section 11
Commonwealth Act No. 578
The right to be well thought-out as a
person in authority, as formerly
discussed, with due respect and
protection.
Enacted on june 8, 1940, conferred
the status of “Person in authority “
upon the teachers, professors, and
persons charged with the supervision
of public or duly recognized private
schools, colleges and universities.
Code of ethics for Right to choose II. THE EDUCATIONAL
professional alternative career COMMUNITY
teachers: Rights lines Chapter 2 Rights Section 11
and Duties The right to be given the prospect to
pursue alternative career pathways
such as school administration,
classroom teaching, or others in
order to advance in one’s Career.
Code of ethics for Right to discharge II. THE EDUCATIONAL
professional responsibilities COMMUNITY
teachers: Rights from the school Chapter 3 duties and obligations
and Duties Section 16
A teacher can carry out his or her
responsibilities for the school in
accordance with the school’s
Philosophy, goals and objectives.
Batas pambansa Right to be liable II. THE EDUCATIONAL
Blg. 232 (THE for the efficient and COMMUNITY
EDUCATION effective attainment Chapter 3 Duties and Obligations
ACT OF 1982) of specified Section 16
learning Objectives Teacher held accountable for the
efficient achievement of specific
learning objectives in support of
national development goals within
the constraints of available school
resources.
Batas pambansa Right to provide II. THE EDUCATIONAL
Blg. 232 (THE daily reports for COMMUNITY
EDUCATION students Chapter 3 Duties and Obligations
ACT OF 1982) performance Section 16
Providing regular reports in every
student’s Performances and To the
latter’s Parents or guardians with
specific suggestion for
improvement.
Batas pambansa Right to maintain II. the EDUCATIONAL
Blg. 232 (THE and sustain COMMUNITY
EDUCATION professional growth Chapter 3 Duties and Obligations
ACT OF 1982) Section 16
Accept responsibility for upholding
and sustaining his/her professional
growth advancement, as well as
keeping professionalism in his
behavior at all times.
Batas pambansa Rights to refrain II. The EDUCATIONAL
Blg. 232 (THE deductions from COMMUNITY
EDUCATION student’s rating Chapter 3 Duties and Obligations
ACT OF 1982) performances. Section 16
Refrain from deducting points from
student’s scholastic ratings for
actions that are clearly not revealing
of poor scholarship.
Batas pambansa Right to participate II. THE EDUCATIONAL
Blg. 232 (THE in social economic, COMMUNITY
EDUCATION political, Chapter 3 Duties and Obligations
ACT OF 1982) intellectual and Section 16
cultural community Partake as a productive social,
economic, moral, intellectual,
cultural and political change agent in
his/her school and community
within the context of national
policies
CRITICAL THINKING

Assessment Task 2: Case analysis

1) Marben, a 16-year-old high school student stabbed his classmate Toto who is his rival for a girl named
Juliana using a newly sharpened Mongol 2 pencil. This happened after their class in Araling Panlipunan
with Ma’am Kriz Cogito (Marbens’ Tita) at the school playground. Who may be held liable? Provide a legal
basis.
In this scenario the teacher becomes liable for the students doing basing the ARTICLE 2180 OF THE
NEW CIVIL which entails that whenever that the student who commit the act is still in the custody of the
teacher or still in the school premises when the act was done. Therefore, the teacher is liable in this situation.

2) Joel, a teacher in his prime years loaned a huge sum from Marites. Joel defaulted in his payments and the
obligation has become due and demandable. Despite several demands, Joel fell silent and cut his
communications to Marites. Marites heard some rumors and hearsays with her friends and neighbours that
joel already paid his loan and he called Marites “Laug ug baga ug nawong.” Marites then went to the Joel’s
school and attacked Joel while he was on his way home. Can Joel be considered as a person in authority?
Answer with legal basis
According to the (Article 152 of the revised penal code which determines the person in authority and in
Article 148 and article 151 – which says that any individual charged or considered as person in authority
must be in actual Performance of his/ger duty) so which means in Joel’s situation which he is no longer
performing his duty when the conflict happens and also he is no longer on the school grounds which means
at a time that act or marites attacked joel, Joel is not vested by the article 152 of the revised penal code and
confirmly a Civilian individual. Therefore, joel is not a person in authority when the scandal happens.

3) After things have returned back to normal and COVID-19 was no longer a threat, Mrs. Destacasingco, the
adviser for BSED SocStud III organized an Educational Tour to Bantayan Island. Along the road, the left
from tire exploded. The bus fell into a ravine that resulted to the death of one of her students Jay Sean and
physical injuries of five of her students. All students has sustained trauma to the accident. Is Mrs.
Destacasingco liable? Yes or no? How about the school and the bus driver? Cite your legal basis.

According to the Article 219 and article 219 of Special Parental Authority Under the family Code-
the school, administrators, teachers or the institution is liable when there’s something happens to
the students’ even if they are in the school grounds as long as they are included in the school’s
organized program such as educational tours that is being tackled in this scenario and as Mrs.
Destacasingco is part of the institution therefore, she is subsidiarily liable for the unintended
accident.

CREATING
Assessment Task 3: Concept Mapping
RIGHTS

The rights to be free of


mandatory assignments Right to choose alternative
that are not related to their Code of ethics career lines
contract of duties for professional
teachers: Rights
and Duties

The right to intellectual Right to discharge


property. responsibilities from the
school

Right as a person of
Authority

PHILIPPINE
Duties and Obligations EDUCATIONAL
LAWS

Teacher held accountable for the efficient


achievement of specific learning objectives Partake as a productive social,
in support of national development goals economic, moral, intellectual,
within the constraints of available school Batas cultural and political change agent
resources. Pambansa Blg. in his/her school and community
within the context of national
232 (THE
policies
Providing regular reports in every student’s EDUCATION
Performances and To the latter’s Parents or ACT OF 1982)
guardians with specific suggestion for Accept responsibility for
improvement. upholding and sustaining his/her
professional growth
advancement, as well as keeping
professionalism in his behavior at
Refrain from deducting points from
all times.
student’s scholastic ratings for actions
that are clearly not revealing of poor
scholarship

You might also like