You are on page 1of 11

CEGE 4412 University of Minnesota Spring 2016

HOMEWORK ASSIGNMENT 4
(Due 3/21/2016)

1) The slab shown supports a superimposed


dead load of 25 psf and a live load of 60
psf. The slab extends 4 in. past the
exterior face of the column to support an
exterior wall that weighs 400 lbs per foot
of length of the wall. The story-to-story
height is 9.5 ft. Use 4,500 psi concrete maximum
moment
and Grade 60 reinforcement. Select slab location
thickness, assuming that a single value
will be used for the entire floor.

SOLUTION:

The depth of the slab is controlled by


either of the following: deflection
criterion, moment strength or shear
strength.

Since we had not covered two-way (punching) shear when this assignment was made, only
the deflection criterion and moment strength will be considered.

a. Deflection Criterion

• Define Lengths
The N-S direction controls because it has longer spans.
In the longitudinal (N-S) direction of the equivalent frame
l1 = 20'
ln = l1 – 2(hcol/2) = l1 – hcol = 20' – (16"/12"/') = 18.67' = 224"
In the transeverse (E-W) direction of the equivalent frame
l2 = 18'
ln = l2 – 2(hcol/2) = l2 – hcol = 18' – (16"/12"/') = 16.67' = 200"

• Slab Thickness
The controlling span is the end (exterior) span because it has less support from the edge
(discontinuous end) of the frame from Table 8.3.1.1 (w/o drop panels, exterior panels,
w/o edge beams and fy = 60,000 psi).
hs ≥ ln/30 = (224")/30 = 7.47" ~ 7 ½"

b. Moment Strength

• The controlling span direction is North-South, i.e. l1 = 20' and l2 = 18'. The largest moment, per
unit of slab width, will be at the exterior face of the first interior support in the end span. The
most heavily loaded frame, per unit of slab width, is the edge frame in the North-South
direction (vertical) because it carries the floor loads in addition to the wall load.
CEGE 4412 University of Minnesota Spring 2016

• The wall load will be handled separately from the floor loads, and the two moments for these
loadings will be combined using superposition.

( )
• Geometry: l1 = 20' ; l2 = 18' ; ln = l1 − 2 hcol 2 = 20'− 16" 12"/ ' = 18.67' = 224" ( )
l2* = l2 2 +12" = 18' 2 +1' = 10' ; α f 1 ~ 0 ; α f 1 l2 l1 ~ 0
( ) ( )
• Loading: Floor Load qu – includes slab weight, superimposed dead and live loads
qu = 1.2 γ c hs + Dsi +1.6L = 1.2!" 150 pcf 6" 12"/ ' #$ +1.6 60 psf = 216 psf
( ) ( )( ) ( )
Wall Line Load wu – dead load applied close to the column line of the edge frame
(
wu = 1.2wwall = 1.2 400 plf = 480 plf )
• Static Moments: Floor Load – Mo1 is generated over the width l2* of the edge frame
2
M o1 = qu l2*ln2 8 = 0.216 ksf 10' 18.67'
( )( )( ) 8 = 94.08'-k = 1129"-k
Wall Line Load – Mo2 is generated close to the column line. It is assumed here that
this moment is resisted ONLY by the COLUMN STRIP
2
M o2 = wu ln2 8 = 0.48 klf 18.67'
( )( ) 8 = 20.91'-k = 251"-k
• DDM Moments for Floor Load (qu and Mo1)
Negative moment at exterior face of 1st interior support (Table 8.10.4.2)
M int,1

= 0.70M o1
Column strip moment at exterior face of 1st interior support (Table 8.10.5.1)
M cs,1

= 0.75M int,1

= 0.75 0.70M o1 = 0.75 0.70 1129"-k = 593"-k
( ) ( )( )
• DDM Moments for Wall Line Load (wu and Mo2)
Negative moment at exterior face of 1st interior support (Table 8.10.4.2)
M int,2

= 0.70M o2
The column strip is assumed to take all of this load because of the concentrated
manner in which the wall load is applied
M cs,2

= 1.0M int,2

= 1.0 0.70M o1 = 1.0 0.70 251"-k = 176"-k
( ) ( )( )
• Maximum Moment (at column strip of exterior face of first interior support)
M cs− = M cs,1

+ M cs,2

= 593"-k +176"-k = 769"-k
This moment acts over the width of the Column Strip, wCS
• Minimum slab depth – To minimize slab depth, maximize reinforcement ratio – use ρmax
" f ! %" ε % " 4.5 ksi %" 0.003 %
ρ max = 0.85β1 $$ c ''$$ cu '' = 0.85 0.825 $ '$ ( )' = 0.01972
# f y &# εcu + εt & # 60 ksi &# 0.003+ 0.005 &
" f ! − 4,500 psi % " 500 psi %
Note that β1 = 0.85− 0.05$ c ' = 0.85− 0.05$ ' = 0.825
# 1,000 psi & # 1,000 psi &
φ M n ≥ M u = M cs− = 769"-k
2
φ As,max f y ( d min − a 2) = φ ( ρ max bd min ) f y ( jd min ) = φρ max bf y j d min ( )
1 # 1
But b = wCS =
4
%
$smaller of l1 or l2 & +12" = 18' +1' = 5.5' = 66"
4
( )
CEGE 4412 University of Minnesota Spring 2016

d min =
Mu φ

(769" )-k
0.9
= 3.39"
ρ max bf y j (0.01972) (66") (60 ksi) (0.95)
3" 3"
hs,min = d min + cover + db = 3.39"+ + = 4.89" ~ 5"
4 4

The deflection criterion controls and hs,min = 7 12 "


2) Solve Problem 13-3 in p. 781 of Wight and MacGregor. (Note, end span of an interior frame.)
Use the direct-design method to compute the moments
2. Solve Problem forofthe
13-3 in p. 781 column
Wight strip and middle strip
and MacGregor..
spanning perpendicular to the edge of the exterior bay of the flat-plate slab shown in Fig. P13-3.
Use the direct-design method to compute the moments for the column strip and middle strip
Assume the slab is 7½ in. thick and supports
spanning
aperpendicular
superimposed dead load of 25 psf and a liflat-plate
ve
to the edge of the exterior bay of theSpring slab shown in Fig. P13-3.
CEGE 4412 University of Minnesota 2016
load of 50 psf. There is no edge beam.Assume
The columns are all 18 in. square.
the slab is 7½ in. thick and supports a superimposed dead load of 25 psf and a live
load of 50 psf. There is no edge beam. The columns are all 18 in. square.
l2 = l2 =
2) Use the Direct Design Method in ACI l2 = l2 =
318-14 to compute the moments for the
column strip (CS) an middle strip (MS)
spanning perpendicular to the edge ofstrip
column column strip
the exterior bat of the flat plate slab CS CS

shown. Assume½ middle


the slab
strip
is 7½" thick ½ middle strip
½ middle
½MS strip = l1
½ middle strip
½MS
= l1

and supports a superimposed


½MS dead load ½MS
of 25 psf and a live load of 50 psf.
There are no edge beams and the
columns are all 18" square. (Note, end
span of an interior frame.)
1) Factored Load
wu 1.2 w D 1.6 w L
1) Factored Load 7.5"
wu 1.2 150 pcf 25 psf 1.6 50 psf
wu 1.2 w D 1.6 w L 12" /'
wu 1.2 118.75 psf 1.6 50 psf 142.5 80
7.5"
wu 1.2 150 pcf 25 psf wu1.6222
50.5psf
psf 0.223 ksf
12" /'
wu 1.2 118.75 psf 1.6 50 psf 2) Check
142.ACI
5 Requirements
80 for Direct Design Method
Check the requirements of ACI §13.6.1
wu 222.5 psf 0.223 ksf ACI §13.6.1.1 – It is assumed that there are at least 3 spans in each direction, OK
ACI §13.6.1.2 – The panels are rectangular with equal spans assumed in both directions
ACI §13.6.1.3 – Successive spans appear to be the same in each direction, OK
2) Check ACI Requirements for Direct Design Method
ACI §13.6.1.4 – Columns are not offset, OK
Check the requirements of ACI §13.6.1 ACI §13.6.1.5 – Only gravity loads are considered, and wL/wD = 50/118.75
50/115.6 = =0.432
0.42<<2,2.0,
OKOK
ACI §13.6.1.1 – It is assumed that there are at least 3 spans in each direction, OK
ACI §13.6.1.6 – There are no beams along column lines, so f1 ~ f2 ~ 0, OK
ACI §13.6.1.7
ACI §13.6.1.2 – The panels are rectangular – Moments
with equal spanswill not be redistributed,
assumed OK
in both directions
ACI §13.6.1.3 – Successive spans appear
3) Total to be the same in each direction, OK
Static Moment
ACI §13.6.1.4 – Columns are notl1offset, OK
20 ft ; l 2 19 ft
ACI §13.6.1.5 – Only gravity loads are considered,
hc
and w /w = 50/118.75
18" L D
50/115.6 = =0.432
0.42<<2,2.0,
OKOK
ACI §13.6.1.6 – There are no beams l1 2 column
l n along 20' lines, so 18
f1
. 5
~ ft f2 ~ 0, OK
2 12" /'
ACI §13.6.1.7 – Moments will not be redistributed, OK

3) Total Static Moment w u l 2 l n2 0.223 ksf 19' 18.5'


2

l1 20 ft ; l 2 19 ft Mo 181.26 ft - kips
8 8
hc 18"
ln l1 2 20' 18.5 ft 5 of 17
2 12" /'

2
w u l 2 l n2 0.223 ksf 19' 18.5'
Mo 181.26 ft - kips
8 8
CEGE 4412 University of Minnesota Spring 2015
CE 4412 University of Minnesota Spring 2014
4) Positive and Negative Span Moments 5 of 17
According to ACI 13.6.3.3, for an exterior span without beams between interior supports and
without edge beams, the total static moment is distributed longitudinally as
M int 0.70 M o 0.70 181.26 in - kips 126.88 ft - kips
M 0.52 M o 0.52 181.26 ft - kips 94.26 ft - kips
M ext 0.26 M o 0.26 181.26 ft - kips 47.13 ft - kips

5) Subdivision of Interior Negative Moment


a. Column Strip
According to ACI 13.6.4.1, the column strip contribution ( M int,cs ) to interior negative 0
without edge beams, the total static moment is distributed longitudinally as
M int 0.70 M o 0.70 181.26 in - kips 126.88 ft - kips
M 0.52 M o 0.52 181.26 ft - kips 94.26 ft - kips
CEGE 4412 University of Minnesota Spring 2016
M ext 0.26 M o 0.26 181.26 ft - kips 47.13 ft - kips

5) Subdivision of Interior Negative Moment


a. Column Strip
According to ACI 13.6.4.1, the column strip contribution ( M int,cs ) to interior negative 0
-
moment ( M ) is determined knowing that l2/l1 = 0.95 and (negligible slab) .
int f1l2/l1 ~0
9
-
M int,cs 0.75 M int 0.75 126.88 ft - kips 95.16 ft - kips 5
The width of each one-half column strip, located on either side of the column line, is
1 l1 l 2 19'
gcs smaller of l1/4 or4l.275
/4 '= l2/4 = 19'/4 = 4.75'
2 4 4 4
So, the column strip interior negative moment, expressed per unit of column strip width,
gcs = 2(4.75 ft) = 9.50 ft, is
M int,cs 95.16 ft - kips
10.02 ft - kips/ft
gcs 9.50 ft

b. Middle Strip (combination of two one-half middle strips)


The middle strip resists that part of M int not resisted by the column strip (ACI 13.6.6)
M int,ms M int M int,cs 126.88 ft - kips 95.16 ft - kips 31.72 ft - kips
and, expressed per unit of middle strip width, gms = 19' – 9.5' = 9.5 ft
M int,ms 31.72 ft - kips
3.34 ft - kips/ft
gms 9.5 ft

6) Subdivision of Positive Moment


a. Column Strip
According to ACI 13.6.4.4, the column strip contribution ( M cs ) to positive moment ( M )
is determined knowing that l2/l1 = 0.95 and f1l2/l1 ~0 (negligible slab)
M cs 0.60 M 0.60 94.26 ft - kips 56.56 ft - kips
and, expressed per unit of column strip width, gcs = 9.5 ft, is
M cs 56.56 ft - kips
5.95 ft - kips/ft
gcs 9.5 ft

b. Middle Strip (combination of two one-half middle strips)


The middle strip resists the portion of M+ not resisted by the column strip (ACI 13.6.6)
M ms M M cs 94.26 ft - kips 56.56 ft - kips 37.70 ft - kips
and, expressed per unit of middle strip width (gms = 9.5'), is

M ms 37.70 ft - kips
3.97 ft - kips/ft
g ms 9.5 ft

6 of 17
CEGE 4412 University of Minnesota Spring 2016
CEGE 4412 University of Minnesota Spring 2015

CE 4412 University of Minnesota Spring 2014


7) Subdivision of Exterior Negative Moment
a. Column Strip
According to ACI 13.6.4.2, the column strip contribution ( M ext,cs ) to exterior negative
-
moment ( M ext ) is determined using l2/l1 = 0. 95, f1l2/l1 ~ 0, and t ~ 0. Note, the last value
is assumed (i.e., t ~ 0) because there are no edge beams in the slab. (negligible slab)
M ext,cs 1.00 M ext M ext 42.17 ft - kips
Column strip exterior negative moment, expressed per unit of width (gcs = 9.50'), is
M ext,cs 47.13 ft - kips
4.96 ft - kips/ft
gcs 9.50 ft

b. Middle Strip (combination of two one-half middle strips)


The middle strip resists the portion of M ext not resisted by the column strip (ACI 13.6.6),
and, in this case the column strip is assigned 100% of M ext , so
M ext,ms M ext M ext ,cs M ext M ext 0
M ext ,ms
Min. slab steel (i.e., shrink. & temp. steel) would be used here, and 0
gms

8) Summary

Location @ Int. Supp. ( M int ) @ Midspan (M+) @ Ext. Supp. ( M ext )


Column total 95.16 ft-kips 56.56 ft-kips 47.13 ft-kips
Strip per foot of width 10.02 ft-kips/ft 5.95 ft-kips/ft 4.96 ft-kips/ft
Middle total 31.72 ft-kips 37.70 ft-kips 0 (S&T steel)
Strip per foot of width 3.34 ft-kips/ft 3.97 ft-kips/ft 0 (S&T steel)
TOTAL 126.88 ft-kips 94.26 ft-kips 47.13 ft-kips

9) Calculation of t at Exterior Support


C 1 0.63 x y x 3 y 3
3 beam hs = 7½"
7.5" 7.5" 18"
C 1 0.63
18" 3
C 1,867 in 4 hc = 18"

3
bh3 228" 7.5"
Is 8,016 in 4
slab hs = 7½" 12 12
EcbC 1,867 in 4
l2 = 19'=228" t 0.117
2 Ecs I s 2 8,016 in 4

Note, by interpolation of the values in ACI 13.6.4.2, t 0.117 might as well be t 0.


% Mext , 100 100 75 0.117 2.5 98.83% ~ 99%. It is best to assume 100%.

7 of 17
CEGE 4412 University of Minnesota Spring 2016

CEGE 4412 University of Minnesota Spring 2015


3) Use the Equivalent Frame Method to solve Problem 2. Make the following assumptions:
3) a)
UseThere are exactly
the Equivalent three
Frame spans
Method to in each
solve direction
Problem andthe
2. Make thefollowing
span lengths are uniform.
simplifying assumptions:
a) There are exactly three spans in each direction and the span lengths are uniform.
b) There are no column offsets and column heights above and below the floor are 12' c/c.
b) There are no column offsets and the column heights above and below the floor are 12' c/c.
c) Concrete compressive strength is 4,000 psi and steel yield stress is 60 ksi.
c) Concrete compressive strength is 4,000 psi and steel yield stress is 60 ksi.
d) There arearenonobeams
d) There alongalong
edge beams anyanyof the edges
of the edgesofofthe
the floor.
floor.
e) There
e) There are identical cantilever overhangs along all edgesedges
are identical cantilever overhangs along all of the of the floor.
floor.

Grid
A total of seven (7) horizontal lines are needed at vertical ordinates:
z = 0, 3.75, 140.25, 144, 147.5, 284.25 and 288 in.
A total of twelve (12) vertical lines are needed at horizontal ordinates:
x = 0, 9, 18, 240, 249, 258, 480, 489, 498, 720, 729 and 738 in.
The full model is shown below including the grid (in gray), the frame members (in yellow) and the
fixed supports (in green) at the ‘far’ ends of the columns above and below the floor.

Loading
The floor supports dead load from the structure weight, superimposed dead load and live load.
qD = 118.75 psf
qL = 50 psf
qL/qD = 50/118.75 = 0.421 < 0.75, so patterned live loads are not needed
qu = 1.2qD + 1.6qL = 1.2(118.75) + 1.6(50) = 222.5 psf
SAP2000 frame analysis requires line loads:
wu = l2*qu = (19')*(222.5 psf) = 4,227.5 plf = 4.2275 klf = 0.3523 kip/in.

Material Properties
All members are made of concrete, so use a single material
f 'c = 4,000 psi = 4 ksi
Ec = 57,000√f 'c = 57,000*(√4,000) = 3,605,000 psi = 3,605 ksi
Use a unit weight (weight density) equal to 0 because the structure weight is included in qu and wu.
CEGE 4412 University of Minnesota Spring 2016

CEGE 4412 University of Minnesota Spring 2015

Section Properties
Four different section properties are needed to describe: the portion of the slabs between column
supports (FSEC1), the portion of the slabs supported directly by the columns (FSEC2), the portion of
the columns between slabs (FSEC3), and the portion of the columns trapped by the slabs (FSEC4).

FSEC1: The portion of the slabs between column supports


The section is rectangular with depth equal to hs = 7.5 in., and width equal to l2 = 19 ft.
The moment of inertia was computed in Problem 2, I1 = Is = 8,016 in4
But SAP2000 only needs the shape and dimensions:
Rectangular: h1 = 7.5 in., b1 = 19 ft = 228 in.

FSEC2: The portion of the slabs supported directly by the columns


The section has a revised moment of inertia, I2, which is modified as per ACI to recognize the
stiffening effect of the column supports.
I2 = Is / [1 – (c2/l2)]2 = (8016 in4) / [1 – (18" / 228")]2 = 9,449 in4
Define a rectangular section with h2 = hs = 7.5 in and I2 = 9,449 in4
b2 = 12I2 / hs3 = (12)( 9,449 in4) / (7.5")3 = 268.77 in.
SAP2000 requires the shape and dimensions:
Rectangular: h2 = 7.5 in., b2 = 268.77 in. = 22.398 ft

FSEC3: The portion of the columns between slabs


Determine the (unaltered) column flexural stiffness, ΣKc
Icol = 12bcolhcol3 = 12(18")(18")3 = 8,748 in4
ΣKc = Σ(4EcIc / lcol) = 2[(4)(3,605 ksi)(8,748 in4)] / [(12")(12"/')] = 1,752,030 kip-in/rad
Determine the torsional stiffness, Kt, of the torsional member
Kt = Σ{[9EcsC]/[l2(1 – c2/l2)3]}(Ibs/Is) where Ibs/Is = 1 (no beams along column lines)
C = (1 – 0.63x/y)(x3y/3) = 1,867 in4 from Problem 2
Kt = 2{[(9)(3,605 ksi)(1,867 in4)] / [(228")(1 – 18"/228")3]}(1) = 680,039 kip-in/rad
Determine the equivalent column stiffness Kec
1/Kec = 1/ΣKc + 1/Kt = (1/1,752,030) + (1/680,039) = 1/489,891
Kec = 489,891 kip-in/rad
Determine the moment of inertia of the equivalent column, Iec
Iec = (Kec / ΣKc)Ic = (489,891/1,752,030)(8,748 in4) = 2,446 in4
Use a square cross section to represent the equivalent columns
hec = 4√(12Iec) = 4√[12(8,748 in4)] = 13.09 in.
SAP2000 requires a shape and dimensions:
Square (rectangular): h3 = b3 = 13.09 in.

FSEC4: The portion of the columns trapped by the slabs


Use a large moment of inertia to represent an infinitely stiff member
I4 ~ 1,000Imax = 1,000I2 = 1,000(9,449 in4) = 9,449,000 in4
Use a square section with b4 = h4 = 4√[12(9,449,000 in4)] = 103.19 in.
SAP2000 requires a shape and dimensions:
Square (rectangular): h4 = b4 = 103.19 in.

A final note is in order regarding interior and exterior columns. The equivalent column does not
include the effect of the slab-beams, only the effects of (1) the columns and (2) the torsional member.
If the torsional members are the same for interior and exterior columns, as they are here, and Ibs is the
same for interior and exterior connections, as they are here, then there is no difference in Iec for
interior and exterior columns.
49 136.750 DEAD LinStatic 20.607 4.985 0.000 0.000 0.000
50 0.000 DEAD LinStatic -44.414 -0.940 0.000 0.000 0.000
50 68.250 DEAD LinStatic -44.414 -0.940 0.000 0.000 0.000
50 136.500 DEAD LinStatic -44.414 -0.940 0.000 0.000 0.000
51 0.000 DEAD LinStatic 44.334 -0.934 0.000 0.000 0.000
CEGE 441251 68.375 DEAD University44.334
LinStatic of Minnesota-0.934 0.000 0.000 Spring
0.000 2016
51 136.750 DEAD LinStatic 44.334 -0.934 0.000 0.000 0.000
52 0.000 DEAD LinStatic
CEGE 4412 University 44.334
of Minnesota 0.934 0.000 0.000 0.000
Spring 2015
52 68.375 DEAD LinStatic 44.334 0.934 0.000 0.000 0.000
52 136.750 DEAD LinStatic 44.334 0.934 0.000 0.000 0.000
SAP 2000 Output
53 0.000 DEAD LinStatic -44.414 0.940 0.000 0.000 0.000
53 68.250 DEAD LinStatic -44.414 0.940 0.000 0.000 0.000
Computed Moments for the three slab-beams are shown below at the face of the supports (i.e., the
53 136.500 DEAD LinStatic -44.414 0.940 0.000 0.000 0.000
columns). The moments at the ends of the spans (at support faces) and at mid-span are shown in
55 0.000 DEAD LinStatic 20.607 -4.985 0.000 0.000 0.000
yellow. Maximum positive moment at the end spans (shown in blue) occurs close to, but not quite at
55 68.375 DEAD LinStatic 20.607 -4.985 0.000 0.000 0.000
55 136.750 DEAD LinStatic 20.607 -4.985 0.000 0.000 0.000
the mid-span.

Table: Element Forces - Frames, Part 2 of 2


Table: Element Forces - Frames, Part 2 of 2
Frame Station OutputCase M3 FrameElem ElemStation
in Kip-in in
1 0.000 DEAD -231.495 1-1 0.000
1 68.250 DEAD 111.137 1-1 68.250
1 136.500 DEAD 453.769 1-1 136.500
2 0.000 DEAD -627.628 2-1 0.000
2 22.200 DEAD 60.533 2-1 22.200
2 44.400 DEAD 575.065 2-1 44.400
2 66.600 DEAD 915.970 2-1 66.600
2 88.800 DEAD 1083.248 2-1 88.800
2 111.000 DEAD 1076.897 2-1 111.000 End Span
2 133.200 DEAD 896.920 2-1 133.200
2 155.400 DEAD 543.315 2-1 155.400
2 177.600 DEAD 16.082 2-1 177.600
2 199.800 DEAD -684.778 2-1 199.800
2 222.000 DEAD -1559.266 2-1 222.000
3 0.000 DEAD -1420.622 3-1 0.000
3 22.200 DEAD -639.298 3-1 22.200
3 44.400 DEAD -31.602 3-1 44.400
3 66.600 DEAD 402.467 3-1 66.600
3 88.800 DEAD 662.909 3-1 88.800
3 111.000 DEAD 749.722 3-1 111.000 Center Span
3 133.200 DEAD 662.909 3-1 133.200
3 155.400 DEAD 402.467 3-1 155.400
3 177.600 DEAD -31.602 3-1 177.600
3 199.800 DEAD -639.298 3-1 199.800
HW4P33 Rep.SDB 222.000 DEAD -1420.622 3-1 222.000 SAP2000 v14.0.0 - License #2142F
4 0.000 DEAD 229.897 4-1 0.000 23 March 2015
4 1.875 DEAD 239.243 4-1 1.875
4 Table:
3.750 Element
DEADForces - Frames,
248.590Part 2 of 4-1
2 3.750
Frame
5 Station
0.000 OutputCase
DEAD M3
-469.212 FrameElem
5-1 ElemStation
0.000
5 in
1.750 DEAD Kip-in
-460.488 5-1 in
1.750
5 3.500 DEAD -451.765 5-1 3.500
6 0.000 DEAD 453.769 6-1 0.000
6 1.875 DEAD 463.182 6-1 1.875
6
University 3.750
of Minnesota DEAD 472.595 6-1 3.750 Page 3 of 10
7 0.000 DEAD -250.321 7-1 0.000
7 1.875 DEAD -240.908 7-1 1.875
7 3.750 DEAD -231.495 7-1 3.750
8 0.000 DEAD 46.891 8-1 0.000
8 1.875 DEAD 45.128 8-1 1.875
8 3.750 DEAD 43.365 8-1 3.750
9 0.000 DEAD -85.000 9-1 0.000
9 1.875 DEAD -86.763 9-1 1.875
9 3.750 DEAD -88.526 9-1 3.750
10 0.000 DEAD 87.887 10-1 0.000
10 1.750 DEAD 86.253 10-1 1.750
10 3.500 DEAD 84.619 10-1 3.500
12 0.000 DEAD -43.060 12-1 0.000
12 1.875 DEAD -44.811 12-1 1.875
12 3.750 DEAD -46.562 12-1 3.750
13 0.000 DEAD 43.060 13-1 0.000
13 1.875 DEAD 44.811 13-1 1.875
13 3.750 DEAD 46.562 13-1 3.750
14 0.000 DEAD -87.887 14-1 0.000
14 1.750 DEAD -86.253 14-1 1.750
14 3.500 DEAD -84.619 14-1 3.500
15 0.000 DEAD -1559.266 15-1 0.000
15 22.200 DEAD -684.778 15-1 22.200
15 44.400 DEAD 16.082 15-1 44.400
15 66.600 DEAD 543.315 15-1 66.600
15 88.800 DEAD 896.920 15-1 88.800
15 111.000 DEAD 1076.897 15-1 111.000 End Span
15 133.200 DEAD 1083.248 15-1 133.200
15 155.400 DEAD 915.970 15-1 155.400
15 177.600 DEAD 575.065 15-1 177.600
15 199.800 DEAD 60.533 15-1 199.800
15 222.000 DEAD -627.628 15-1 222.000
16 0.000 DEAD -2.274E-12 16-1 0.000
16 9.000 DEAD -14.268 16-1 9.000
10 0.000 DEAD 87.887 10-1 0.000
10 1.750 DEAD 86.253 10-1 1.750
10 3.500 DEAD 84.619 10-1 3.500
12 0.000 DEAD -43.060 12-1 0.000
CEGE 441212 1.875 DEAD University12-1
-44.811 of Minnesota 1.875 Spring 2016
HW4P3 12 Rep.SDB 3.750 DEAD -46.562 12-1 3.750 SAP2000 v14.0.0 - License #2142F
CEGE 4412
13 0.000 DEAD University
43.060 13-1of Minnesota0.000 Spring 2015
23 March 2015
13 1.875 DEAD 44.811 13-1 1.875
13 3.750
Table: DEADForces - Frames,
Element 46.562
Part 2 of13-1
2 3.750
14
Frame 0.000
Station DEAD
OutputCase -87.887
M3 14-1
FrameElem 0.000
ElemStation
14 1.750
in DEAD -86.253
Kip-in 14-1 1.750
in
14
5 3.500
3.500 DEAD
DEAD -84.619
-451.765 14-1
5-1 3.500
3.500
15
6 0.000
0.000 DEAD
DEAD -1559.266
453.769 15-1
6-1 0.000
0.000
15
6 22.200
1.875 DEAD
DEAD -684.778
463.182 15-1
6-1 22.200
1.875
15
6 44.400
3.750 DEAD
DEAD 16.082
472.595 15-1
6-1 44.400
3.750
15
7 66.600
0.000 DEAD
DEAD 543.315
-250.321 15-1
7-1 66.600
0.000
15
7 88.800
1.875 DEAD
DEAD 896.920
-240.908 15-1
7-1 88.800
1.875
15
7 111.000
3.750 DEAD
DEAD 1076.897
-231.495 15-1
7-1 111.000
3.750 End Span
15
8 133.200
0.000 DEAD
DEAD 1083.248
46.891 15-1
8-1 133.200
0.000
15
8 155.400
1.875 DEAD
DEAD 915.970
45.128 15-1
8-1 155.400
1.875
15
8 177.600
3.750 DEAD
DEAD 575.065
43.365 15-1
8-1 177.600
3.750
15
9 199.800
0.000 DEAD
DEAD 60.533
-85.000 15-1
9-1 199.800
0.000
15
9 222.000
1.875 DEAD
DEAD -627.628
-86.763 15-1
9-1 222.000
1.875
16
9 0.000
3.750 DEAD
DEAD -2.274E-12
-88.526 16-1
9-1 0.000
3.750
16
10 9.000
0.000 DEAD
DEAD -14.268
87.887 16-1
10-1 9.000
0.000
17
10 0.000
1.750 DEAD
DEAD 85.000
86.253 17-1
10-1 0.000
1.750
17
10 1.875
3.500 DEAD
DEAD 86.763
84.619 17-1
10-1 1.875
3.500
17
12 3.750
0.000 DEAD
DEAD 88.526
-43.060 17-1
12-1 3.750
0.000
18
12 0.000
1.875 DEAD
DEAD -46.891
-44.811 18-1
12-1 0.000
1.875
18
12 1.875
3.750 DEAD
DEAD -45.128
-46.562 18-1
12-1 1.875
3.750
18
13 3.750
0.000 DEAD
DEAD -43.365
43.060 18-1
13-1 3.750
0.000
19
13 0.000
1.875 DEAD
DEAD 250.321
44.811 19-1
13-1 0.000
1.875
19
13 1.875
3.750 DEAD
DEAD 240.908
46.562 19-1
13-1 1.875
3.750
19
14 3.750
0.000 DEAD
DEAD 231.495
-87.887 19-1
14-1 3.750
0.000
20
14 0.000
1.750 DEAD
DEAD 469.212
-86.253 20-1
14-1 0.000
1.750
20
14 1.750
3.500 DEAD
DEAD 460.488
-84.619 20-1
14-1 1.750
3.500
20
15 3.500
0.000 DEAD
DEAD 451.765
-1559.266 20-1
15-1 3.500
0.000
21
15 0.000
22.200 DEAD
DEAD -453.769
-684.778 21-1
15-1 0.000
22.200
21
15 1.875
44.400 DEAD
DEAD -463.182
16.082 21-1
15-1 1.875
44.400
21
15 3.750
66.600 DEAD
DEAD -472.595
543.315 21-1
15-1 3.750
66.600
22
15 0.000
88.800 DEAD
DEAD -956.074
896.920 22-1
15-1 0.000
88.800
15 111.000 DEAD 1076.897 15-1 111.000 End Span
15 133.200 DEAD 1083.248 15-1 133.200
15 155.400 DEAD 915.970 15-1 155.400
The deflected
University
15 of shape of the frame is shown below and illustrates clearly its symmetric nature.
Minnesota
177.600 DEAD 575.065 15-1 177.600 Page 4 of 10
15 199.800 DEAD 60.533 15-1 199.800
15 222.000 DEAD -627.628 15-1 222.000
16 0.000 DEAD -2.274E-12 16-1 0.000
16 9.000 DEAD -14.268 16-1 9.000
17 0.000 DEAD 85.000 17-1 0.000
17 1.875 DEAD 86.763 17-1 1.875
17 3.750 DEAD 88.526 17-1 3.750
18 0.000 DEAD -46.891 18-1 0.000
18 1.875 DEAD -45.128 18-1 1.875
18 3.750 DEAD -43.365 18-1 3.750
19 0.000 DEAD 250.321 19-1 0.000
19 1.875 DEAD 240.908 19-1 1.875
19 3.750 DEAD 231.495 19-1 3.750
20 0.000 DEAD 469.212 20-1 0.000
20 1.750 DEAD 460.488 20-1 1.750
20 3.500 DEAD 451.765 20-1 3.500
21 0.000 DEAD -453.769 21-1 0.000
21 1.875 DEAD -463.182 21-1 1.875
21 3.750 DEAD -472.595 21-1 3.750
22 0.000 DEAD -956.074 22-1 0.000

University of Minnesota Page 4 of 10


CEGE 4412 University of Minnesota Spring 2016

CEGE 4412 University of Minnesota Spring 2015

A comparison of the SAP2000 moments for the slab-beams, and the values computed in Problem 2 using
the Direct Design Method (DDM) are given in the following Table.

Comparison of DDM and EFM Moments (EFM Computed using SAP2000)


SAP2000 DDM Difference
Span
Location (kip-in) (kip-ft) (kip-ft) (%)
Left -627.6 -52.30 -47.19 9.89
Middle +1,083.2 +90.27 +94.26 4.42
Left End
Right -1,559.3 -129.94 -126.88 2.35
Mo 2,176.7 181.39 181.30 0.05
Left -1420.6 -118.38 -117.85 0.47
Middle 749.7 +62.48 +63.45 1.49
Middle
Right -1,420.6 -118.38 -117.85 0.47
Mo 2,170.3 180.86 181.30 0.24
Left -1,559.3 -129.94 -126.88 2.35
Middle +1,083.2 +90.27 +94.26 4.42
Right End
Right -627.6 -52.30 -47.13 9.89
Mo 2,176.7 181.39 181.30 0.05

Note, the DDM values for the middle span were note computed in Problem 2. However, they are easily
obtained:
For the negative moment at the ends of the span (at face of supports):
M-DDM = 0.65Mo = 0.65(181.3 kip-ft) = 117.85 kip-ft
For the positive moment at mid-span:
M+DDM = 0.35Mo = 0.35(181.3 kip-ft) = 63.45 kip-ft

Comparison of the moments in the Table above indicates close agreement. The Difference is given as a
percentage relative to the SAP2000 moment. The agreement is this good (less than 5% in most of the
slab-beams except at the discontinuous end where it is less than 10%) because of the ‘regularity’ of the
frame and, most importantly, the absence of beams, drop panels, shear caps and column capitals. The
tabulated values above indicate that the DDM generally tends to underestimate the magnitudes of the
negative moments at the supports, and tends to overestimate the magnitude of the positive moments.

You might also like