Professional Documents
Culture Documents
HOMEWORK ASSIGNMENT 4
(Due 3/21/2016)
SOLUTION:
Since we had not covered two-way (punching) shear when this assignment was made, only
the deflection criterion and moment strength will be considered.
a. Deflection Criterion
• Define Lengths
The N-S direction controls because it has longer spans.
In the longitudinal (N-S) direction of the equivalent frame
l1 = 20'
ln = l1 – 2(hcol/2) = l1 – hcol = 20' – (16"/12"/') = 18.67' = 224"
In the transeverse (E-W) direction of the equivalent frame
l2 = 18'
ln = l2 – 2(hcol/2) = l2 – hcol = 18' – (16"/12"/') = 16.67' = 200"
• Slab Thickness
The controlling span is the end (exterior) span because it has less support from the edge
(discontinuous end) of the frame from Table 8.3.1.1 (w/o drop panels, exterior panels,
w/o edge beams and fy = 60,000 psi).
hs ≥ ln/30 = (224")/30 = 7.47" ~ 7 ½"
b. Moment Strength
• The controlling span direction is North-South, i.e. l1 = 20' and l2 = 18'. The largest moment, per
unit of slab width, will be at the exterior face of the first interior support in the end span. The
most heavily loaded frame, per unit of slab width, is the edge frame in the North-South
direction (vertical) because it carries the floor loads in addition to the wall load.
CEGE 4412 University of Minnesota Spring 2016
• The wall load will be handled separately from the floor loads, and the two moments for these
loadings will be combined using superposition.
( )
• Geometry: l1 = 20' ; l2 = 18' ; ln = l1 − 2 hcol 2 = 20'− 16" 12"/ ' = 18.67' = 224" ( )
l2* = l2 2 +12" = 18' 2 +1' = 10' ; α f 1 ~ 0 ; α f 1 l2 l1 ~ 0
( ) ( )
• Loading: Floor Load qu – includes slab weight, superimposed dead and live loads
qu = 1.2 γ c hs + Dsi +1.6L = 1.2!" 150 pcf 6" 12"/ ' #$ +1.6 60 psf = 216 psf
( ) ( )( ) ( )
Wall Line Load wu – dead load applied close to the column line of the edge frame
(
wu = 1.2wwall = 1.2 400 plf = 480 plf )
• Static Moments: Floor Load – Mo1 is generated over the width l2* of the edge frame
2
M o1 = qu l2*ln2 8 = 0.216 ksf 10' 18.67'
( )( )( ) 8 = 94.08'-k = 1129"-k
Wall Line Load – Mo2 is generated close to the column line. It is assumed here that
this moment is resisted ONLY by the COLUMN STRIP
2
M o2 = wu ln2 8 = 0.48 klf 18.67'
( )( ) 8 = 20.91'-k = 251"-k
• DDM Moments for Floor Load (qu and Mo1)
Negative moment at exterior face of 1st interior support (Table 8.10.4.2)
M int,1
−
= 0.70M o1
Column strip moment at exterior face of 1st interior support (Table 8.10.5.1)
M cs,1
−
= 0.75M int,1
−
= 0.75 0.70M o1 = 0.75 0.70 1129"-k = 593"-k
( ) ( )( )
• DDM Moments for Wall Line Load (wu and Mo2)
Negative moment at exterior face of 1st interior support (Table 8.10.4.2)
M int,2
−
= 0.70M o2
The column strip is assumed to take all of this load because of the concentrated
manner in which the wall load is applied
M cs,2
−
= 1.0M int,2
−
= 1.0 0.70M o1 = 1.0 0.70 251"-k = 176"-k
( ) ( )( )
• Maximum Moment (at column strip of exterior face of first interior support)
M cs− = M cs,1
−
+ M cs,2
−
= 593"-k +176"-k = 769"-k
This moment acts over the width of the Column Strip, wCS
• Minimum slab depth – To minimize slab depth, maximize reinforcement ratio – use ρmax
" f ! %" ε % " 4.5 ksi %" 0.003 %
ρ max = 0.85β1 $$ c ''$$ cu '' = 0.85 0.825 $ '$ ( )' = 0.01972
# f y &# εcu + εt & # 60 ksi &# 0.003+ 0.005 &
" f ! − 4,500 psi % " 500 psi %
Note that β1 = 0.85− 0.05$ c ' = 0.85− 0.05$ ' = 0.825
# 1,000 psi & # 1,000 psi &
φ M n ≥ M u = M cs− = 769"-k
2
φ As,max f y ( d min − a 2) = φ ( ρ max bd min ) f y ( jd min ) = φρ max bf y j d min ( )
1 # 1
But b = wCS =
4
%
$smaller of l1 or l2 & +12" = 18' +1' = 5.5' = 66"
4
( )
CEGE 4412 University of Minnesota Spring 2016
d min =
Mu φ
≈
(769" )-k
0.9
= 3.39"
ρ max bf y j (0.01972) (66") (60 ksi) (0.95)
3" 3"
hs,min = d min + cover + db = 3.39"+ + = 4.89" ~ 5"
4 4
l1 20 ft ; l 2 19 ft Mo 181.26 ft - kips
8 8
hc 18"
ln l1 2 20' 18.5 ft 5 of 17
2 12" /'
2
w u l 2 l n2 0.223 ksf 19' 18.5'
Mo 181.26 ft - kips
8 8
CEGE 4412 University of Minnesota Spring 2015
CE 4412 University of Minnesota Spring 2014
4) Positive and Negative Span Moments 5 of 17
According to ACI 13.6.3.3, for an exterior span without beams between interior supports and
without edge beams, the total static moment is distributed longitudinally as
M int 0.70 M o 0.70 181.26 in - kips 126.88 ft - kips
M 0.52 M o 0.52 181.26 ft - kips 94.26 ft - kips
M ext 0.26 M o 0.26 181.26 ft - kips 47.13 ft - kips
M ms 37.70 ft - kips
3.97 ft - kips/ft
g ms 9.5 ft
6 of 17
CEGE 4412 University of Minnesota Spring 2016
CEGE 4412 University of Minnesota Spring 2015
8) Summary
3
bh3 228" 7.5"
Is 8,016 in 4
slab hs = 7½" 12 12
EcbC 1,867 in 4
l2 = 19'=228" t 0.117
2 Ecs I s 2 8,016 in 4
7 of 17
CEGE 4412 University of Minnesota Spring 2016
Grid
A total of seven (7) horizontal lines are needed at vertical ordinates:
z = 0, 3.75, 140.25, 144, 147.5, 284.25 and 288 in.
A total of twelve (12) vertical lines are needed at horizontal ordinates:
x = 0, 9, 18, 240, 249, 258, 480, 489, 498, 720, 729 and 738 in.
The full model is shown below including the grid (in gray), the frame members (in yellow) and the
fixed supports (in green) at the ‘far’ ends of the columns above and below the floor.
Loading
The floor supports dead load from the structure weight, superimposed dead load and live load.
qD = 118.75 psf
qL = 50 psf
qL/qD = 50/118.75 = 0.421 < 0.75, so patterned live loads are not needed
qu = 1.2qD + 1.6qL = 1.2(118.75) + 1.6(50) = 222.5 psf
SAP2000 frame analysis requires line loads:
wu = l2*qu = (19')*(222.5 psf) = 4,227.5 plf = 4.2275 klf = 0.3523 kip/in.
Material Properties
All members are made of concrete, so use a single material
f 'c = 4,000 psi = 4 ksi
Ec = 57,000√f 'c = 57,000*(√4,000) = 3,605,000 psi = 3,605 ksi
Use a unit weight (weight density) equal to 0 because the structure weight is included in qu and wu.
CEGE 4412 University of Minnesota Spring 2016
Section Properties
Four different section properties are needed to describe: the portion of the slabs between column
supports (FSEC1), the portion of the slabs supported directly by the columns (FSEC2), the portion of
the columns between slabs (FSEC3), and the portion of the columns trapped by the slabs (FSEC4).
A final note is in order regarding interior and exterior columns. The equivalent column does not
include the effect of the slab-beams, only the effects of (1) the columns and (2) the torsional member.
If the torsional members are the same for interior and exterior columns, as they are here, and Ibs is the
same for interior and exterior connections, as they are here, then there is no difference in Iec for
interior and exterior columns.
49 136.750 DEAD LinStatic 20.607 4.985 0.000 0.000 0.000
50 0.000 DEAD LinStatic -44.414 -0.940 0.000 0.000 0.000
50 68.250 DEAD LinStatic -44.414 -0.940 0.000 0.000 0.000
50 136.500 DEAD LinStatic -44.414 -0.940 0.000 0.000 0.000
51 0.000 DEAD LinStatic 44.334 -0.934 0.000 0.000 0.000
CEGE 441251 68.375 DEAD University44.334
LinStatic of Minnesota-0.934 0.000 0.000 Spring
0.000 2016
51 136.750 DEAD LinStatic 44.334 -0.934 0.000 0.000 0.000
52 0.000 DEAD LinStatic
CEGE 4412 University 44.334
of Minnesota 0.934 0.000 0.000 0.000
Spring 2015
52 68.375 DEAD LinStatic 44.334 0.934 0.000 0.000 0.000
52 136.750 DEAD LinStatic 44.334 0.934 0.000 0.000 0.000
SAP 2000 Output
53 0.000 DEAD LinStatic -44.414 0.940 0.000 0.000 0.000
53 68.250 DEAD LinStatic -44.414 0.940 0.000 0.000 0.000
Computed Moments for the three slab-beams are shown below at the face of the supports (i.e., the
53 136.500 DEAD LinStatic -44.414 0.940 0.000 0.000 0.000
columns). The moments at the ends of the spans (at support faces) and at mid-span are shown in
55 0.000 DEAD LinStatic 20.607 -4.985 0.000 0.000 0.000
yellow. Maximum positive moment at the end spans (shown in blue) occurs close to, but not quite at
55 68.375 DEAD LinStatic 20.607 -4.985 0.000 0.000 0.000
55 136.750 DEAD LinStatic 20.607 -4.985 0.000 0.000 0.000
the mid-span.
A comparison of the SAP2000 moments for the slab-beams, and the values computed in Problem 2 using
the Direct Design Method (DDM) are given in the following Table.
Note, the DDM values for the middle span were note computed in Problem 2. However, they are easily
obtained:
For the negative moment at the ends of the span (at face of supports):
M-DDM = 0.65Mo = 0.65(181.3 kip-ft) = 117.85 kip-ft
For the positive moment at mid-span:
M+DDM = 0.35Mo = 0.35(181.3 kip-ft) = 63.45 kip-ft
Comparison of the moments in the Table above indicates close agreement. The Difference is given as a
percentage relative to the SAP2000 moment. The agreement is this good (less than 5% in most of the
slab-beams except at the discontinuous end where it is less than 10%) because of the ‘regularity’ of the
frame and, most importantly, the absence of beams, drop panels, shear caps and column capitals. The
tabulated values above indicate that the DDM generally tends to underestimate the magnitudes of the
negative moments at the supports, and tends to overestimate the magnitude of the positive moments.