Arabic Mechniques

Typographica Academica Traiectina. MEMS 5. Proef 1, 19-3-2002:845, page 1.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
In the following Bibliography and Index, ancient and medieval authors are
listed by their first names (e.g., John Philoponus; Roger Bacon; etc.). Post-
medieval authors are listed by their last names (e.g., Zabarella; Descartes;
etc.). The medieval names are given in their English forms, as Thomas
Aquinas (rather than Tommaso d’Aquino; Thomas von Aquin, etc.)
1. Manuscripts
Anonymus, Quaestiones super De generatione et corruptione. Cambridge, Peter-

house College 192, fols. 119vb–132vb.
—, Quaestiones super Metaphysicam, i–iv. Assisi, Biblioteca Comunale 290,
fols. 65ra–85rb.
—, Quaestiones super Physicam. Cambridge, Gonville and Caius College 344,
fols. 105rb–170vb.
—, Quaestiones super Physicam. Cambridge, Gonville and Caius College 367,
fols. 120ra–125vb, 136ra–151vb.
—, Quaestiones super Physicam, i, iv–vi. Cambridge, Peterhouse College 192,
iv, fols. 53ra–96vb.
—, Quaestiones super Physicam, i–iii. London, Wellcome Historical Medical
Library 333, fols. 8ra–68vb.
—, Quaestiones super Physicam, i–iv, v, (Fragm.). Oxford, Merton College
272, fols. 136ra–174brb.
—, Quaestiones super Physicam, i, iii–iv. Oxford, Merton College 272,
fols. 119ra–135crb.
—, Quaestiones super Physicam, i–v. Oxford, Oriel College 33, fols. 8ra–79vb.
—, Quaestiones super Physicam, i–viii. Siena, Biblioteca Comunale degli In-
tronati, l.iii.21, fols. 1ra–92ra.
—, Sententia libri Physicorum “extracta de verbo ad verbum”, i–v. Oxford,
Bodleian Library, Lat. Misc. c. 69, fols. 1ra–41rb.
Anonymus (= Giles of Orleans (?)), Quaestiones super Physicam, i–viii.
Paris, Bibliothèque Nationale de France, lat. 14698, fols. 83ra–129ar.
Barile, E. (ed.), Rotuli Artistarum (1430–1815). Unpublished ms., Antico
Archivio dell’Università, Padova.
Bartholomew of Bruges, Quaestiones super Physicam, i–v, vii, viii. Leipzig,
Universitätsbibliothek 1426, fols. 1r–114v.
Corti, M., Lectiones in artem medicinalem Galeni. London, Wellcome Historical
Medical Library 216, fols. 66r–281r.
Geoffrey of Aspall, Quaestiones super Physicam, i–iii, iv (Fragm.), viii.
Oxford, Merton College 272, fols. 88ra–118vb.
Giles (= Giles of Orleans ?), Quaestiones super Physicam, i–viii. Padova,
Biblioteca Antoniana xvii. 380, fols. 1ra–62ra.
2 bibliography
John of Wacfeld, Quaestiones super Physicam, i. Cambridge, Gonville and

Caius College 344, fols. 264ra–277vb.
John the Canon, Quaestiones super octo libros Physicorum Aristotelis, Città del
Vaticano, Biblioteca Apostolica Vaticana, Vat.lat. 3013.
Pendasio, F., Lectiones in libros De anima. Padova, Biblioteca Universitaria,
1264, 1–221.
Possevinus, A., Annales quinquaginta annorum quos Sacerdos e Societate Iesu
iussus est scribere iis de rebus ad quas missus est. Decas I. Roma, arsi, Opp.
nn. 336.
Radulphus Brito, Quaestiones super Physicam, i–viii, Firenze, Biblioteca
Nazionale Centrale, Conv. Soppr. E. 1. 252, fols. 1ra–60ra.
Ps.-Simplicius, “Prooemium” of In libros Aristotelis De anima commentaria.
Partial translation by Michael Sophianus. Milano, Biblioteca Ambrosiana,
d 465 inf. Fasc. 12.
Taurellus, N., Theses clarissimi Dn. D. Nicolai Taurelli de persona Christi. Er-
langen, Universitätsbibliothek 695, pp. 137–160.
Thomas Anglicus (?), Quaestiones super Physicam, i–viii. Erfurt, Wis-
senschaftliche Bibliothek der Stadt, Amplon. f. 348, fols. 69va–115vb.
Thomas Wylton, Quaestiones super Physicam, i–viii. Cesena, Biblioteca
Malatestiana, Plut. viii Sin. 2.
—, Quodlibet. Città del Vaticano, Biblioteca Apostolica Vaticana, Borgh. 36,
fols. 47r–96v.
hPs. ?i Walter Burley, Quaestiones super Physicam, i–vi. Worcester, Cathe-
dral Library Q. 38, fols. 25va–96va.
Walter Burley, Expositio libri Physicorum, i–viii. Cambridge, Gonville and
Caius College 448, pp. 172–543.
—, Quaestiones super Physicam. Basel, Universitätsbibliothek f v 12, fols. 108r–
171v.
William Bonkes (?), Quaestiones super Physicam, i–viii. Cambridge, Peter-
house College 192, i, fols. 37ra–119vb.
William Bonkes, Quaestiones super De generatione et corruptione. Cambridge,
Gonville and Caius College 344, fols. 92ra–102rb.
William Clive, Quaestiones super Physicam, i–viii. Worcester, Cathedral Li-
brary q. 13, fols. 79ra–116ra.
William of Chelvestun, Quaestiones super Physicam, i. Cambridge, Peter-
house College 192, i, fols. 1ra–36vb.
2. Published Sources
d’Abano, P., Conciliator controversiarum, quae inter philosophos et medicos ver-

santur. Venezia, 1548.
Abattouy, M., “Al-Muz. affar al-Isfizārı̄, â̄lim mikānı̄kı̄ min al-qarnayn 5–
6/11–12, mu\allif Irshād dhawı̄ al- îrfān ilā s.inā ât al-qaffān.” (“Al-Muz. affar
al-Isfizārı̄, a mechanician from the eleventh/twelfth century, author of
Guiding the Learned Men in the Art of the Steelyard.”) In Quelques aspects de
bibliography 3
l’évolution des idées scientifiques, pp. 135–175.

—, “The Arabic Tradition of Mechanics. Textual and Historical Characteri-
sation.” Majallat kulliyyat al-ādāb wa al- ûlūm al-insāniyya bi-Fās. Journal of
the Faculty of Letters and Humanities in Fez, 12 (1999), 75–109.
—, “Greek Mechanics in Arabic Context. Thābit ibn Qurra, al-Isfizārı̄ and
the Arabic Traditions of Aristotelian and Euclidean Mechanics.” Science in
Context, 14 (2001), 179–247.
—, “Nutaf min al-hiyal.
. A Short Arabic Version of Pseudo-Aristotle’s Prob-
lemata Mechanica.” Early Science and Medicine, 6 (2001), 96–122.
—, “Sur quelques démonstrations grecques et arabes de la loi du levier.
Transmission et transformation.” In Actes du Vème Colloque Marocain, pp. 7–
43.
—, “La tradition arabe de la balance. Thābit ibn Qurra et al-Khāzinı̄.” In
Quelques aspects de l’évolution des idées scientifiques, pp. 49–91.
Abbondanza, R., “Gli atti degli Ufficiali dello Studio fiorentino, dal maggio
al settembre 1388.” Archivio storico italiano, 117 (1959), 85–110.
•••Achillini, A., Opera omnia in unum collecta. Venezia, 1545.
—, In physico auditu. In Opera omnia, pp. ?
Actes du Vème Colloque Marocain d’Histoire des Sciences. Rabat, 2000.
Adams, M. M., William Ockham. Notre Dame, Indiana, 1987.
Aertsen, J. & A. Speer (eds.), Raum und Raumvorstellungen im Mittelalter.
Berlin & New York, 1998.
Aertsen, J. A., K. Emery, Jr., A. Speer (eds.), Nach der Verurteilung von 1277.
Philosophie und Theologie an der Universität von Paris im letzten Viertel des 13.
Jahrhunderts. Berlin & New York, 2001.
Agrimi, J. & C. Crisciani, Edocere medicos. Medicina scolastica nei secoli xiii–xv.
Napoli, 1988.
Albert of Saxony, Questiones in octo libros Physicorum Aristotelis. In Lokert
(ed.), Questiones et decisiones.
•••Albert the Great, Liber viii Physicorum. In Opera omnia. Ed. A. Borgnet.
38 vols. Paris, 1890–1899. (vol?
Albert the Great, Opera omnia. Gen. ed. B. Geyer. Münster, 1951–.
—, Physica. Ed. P. Hossfeld. In Opera omnia, part 4. 2 vols. Münster, 1987 and
1993.
Alberti, A. & R. W. Sharples (eds.), Aspasius: The Earliest Extant Commen-
tator on Aristotle’s Ethics. Berlin, 1999.
Alderotti, T., In C. Galeni microtechnen commentarii. Napoli, 1522.
Ps.-Alexander, In Aristotelis Metaphysica commentaria. Ed. M. Hayduck.
Berlin, 1891. (Commentaria in Aristotelem graeca, 1)
Alexander of Aphrodisias, In Aristotelis Metaphysica commentaria. Ed.
M. Hayduck. Berlin, 1891.
—, On Aristotle’s Metaphysics i. Ed. and trans. W. E. Dooley. London, 1989.
—, De anima liber cum mantissa. Trans. H. Donatus. Venezia, 1514.
—, Praeter commentaria scripta minora. Vol. 1: De anima liber cum mantissa. Vol.
2: Quaestiones, De fato, De mixtione. Ed. I. Bruns. Berlin, 1887–1892.
—, Quaestiones 1.1–2.15. Trans. R. W. Sharples. London, 1992.
—, Quaestiones naturales, de anima, morales.... Trans. G. Hervet. Basel, 1548.
4 bibliography
Alfarabi, De intellectu et intellecto. In E. Gilson, “Les sources gréco-arabes de

l’augustinianisme avicennisant,” Archives d’histoire doctrinale et littéraire du
Moyen Age, 4 (1930), 115–126.
Algazel, Metaphysics. A Medieval Translation. Ed. J. T. Muckle. Toronto, 1933.
Algra, K., Concepts of Space in Greek Thought. Leiden, 1995.
Alliez, E. (ed.), Metamorphosen der Zeit. München, 1999.
Alliney, G., The Medieval Concept of Time and Its Influence on Early Modern
Philosophy. Leiden, forthcoming.
Amatori, E. (ed.), Storia dell’Università di Pisa. Pisa, 1993–.
Ammonius, In Aristotelis De interpretatione commentarius. Ed. A. Busse. Berlin,
1897.
Anton, J. P. & G. L. Kustas, Essays in Ancient Greek Philosophy. Albany, 1971.
Anton, J. P. (ed.), Naturalism and Historical Understanding: Essays on the Phi-
losophy of J. H. Randall, Jr.. New York, 1967.
Antonaci, A., Ricerche sull’aristotelismo del Rinascimento. Marcantonio Zimara.
Vol. ii: Dal periodo salernitano al secondo periodo padovano. Lecce, 1978.
Argenterius, J., In artem medicinalem Galeni commentarii tres. Köningsberg,
1566.
Ariew, R. & A. Gabbey, “The Scholastic Background.” In Garber e.a. (eds.),
Cambridge History of Seventeenth-Century Philosophy, pp. 425–453.
Ariew, R., “Bernier et les doctrines gassendistes et cartésiennes de l’espace:
Réponses au problème de l’explication de l’eucharistie.” Corpus, Revue de
Philosophie, 20/21 (1992), 155–170.
—, “Damned if You Do. Cartesians and Censorship, 1663–1706.” Perspectives
on Science, 2 (1994), 255–274.
Ariew, R. & M. Grene (eds.), Descartes and his Contemporaries. Meditations,
Objections, and Replies. Chicago, 1995.
Aristotle, De anima. Edited with Introduction and Commentary by W.
D. Ross. Oxford 1961.
—, Categoriae vel praedicamenta. Translatio Boethii, editio composita, translatio
Guillelmi de Moerbeka, lemmata e Simplici commentario decrepta & pseudo-
Augustini paraphrasis Themistiana. Ed. L. Minio-Paluello. Bruges & Paris,
1961.
—, The Complete Works of Aristotle. The Revised Oxford Translation. Ed. J. Barnes.
2 vols. Princeton, N. J., 1984.
—, On the Heavens. Trans. J. L. Stocks. In The Works of Aristotle [Ross]. Vol. 2.
—, Mechanica. Trans. E. S. Forster. In The Works of Aristotle [Ross], vol. 4.
Oxford, 1952.
—, Metaphysica. Ed. W. Jaeger. Oxford, 1957.
—, Metaphysics. Trans. W. D. Ross. In The Works of Aristotle [Ross]. Vol. 8.
—, Metaphysik Z. Text, Übersetzung und Kommentar von M. Frede &
G. Patzig. 2 vols. München, 1988.
—, Opera cum Averrois commentariis [Giunta]. 11 vols. Venezia, 1562–1574.
—, In De physico auditu libros octo cum Averrois Cordubensis commentariis.
Venezia, 1562. Opera cum Averrois commentariis [Giunta], vol. 4. Repr.
Frankfurt a. M., 1962.
—, Physics, Books iii and iv. Translated with Notes by E. Hussey. Oxford,
bibliography 5
1983.
—, Physics. A Revised Text with Introduction and Commentary by W. D. Ross.
3rd corr. ed. Oxford, 1936.
—, Physics i, ii. Trans. W. Charlton. Oxford, 1970.
—, The Works of Aristotle. Translation into English under the editorship of
W. D. Ross e.a. 12 vols. Oxford, 1908–1952.
Arminius, J., Disputationum Theologicarum quarto repetitarum quadragesima-
quarta de S. Coena Domini. Disputation defended by L. Michael. Leiden,
1606.
Armogathe, J. R., G. Canziani & Y. Ch. Zarka (eds.), L’interpretazione nei
secoli xvi e xvii. Milano, 1993.
Armogathe, J.-R., Theologia Cartesiana: L’explication physique de l’Eucharistie
chez Descartes et Dom Desgabets. Den Haag, 1977.
Asclepius, In Aristotelis Metaphysicorum libros a-z commentaria. Ed. M. Hay-
duck. Berlin, 1888.
Ashworth, W. B., Jr., “Catholicism and Early Modern Science.” In Lindberg
e.a. (eds.), God & Nature, pp. 136–166.
Augustine, Opera omnia. Ed. D. Erasmus. 10 vols. Basel, 1528/9.
—, Opera omnia. Ed. D. Erasmus. 10 vols. Basel, 1528/9.
Autour d’Aristote. Recueil d’études de philosophie ancienne et médiévale offert à
Monseigneur A. Mansion. Louvain, 1955.
Averroes, Commentarium magnum in Aristotelis De anima libros. Ed. F. S. Craw-
ford. Cambridge, Mass.,1953.
—, Epistola de connexione intellectus abstracti cum homine. In Aristotle, Opera cum
Averrois commentariis [Giunta], vol. 9.
—, Epitome in librum Metaphysicae. In Aristotle, Opera cum Averrois commentariis
[Giunta], vol. 7.
—, In xii Metaphysicorum Aristotelis librum. In Aristotle, Opera cum Averrois
commentariis [Giunta], vol. 8.
—, Sermo de substantia orbis. In Aristotle Opera cum Averrois commentariis [Giun-
ta], vol. 9.
—, De substantia orbis. Critical Edition of the Hebrew Text with English Trans-
lation and Commentary by A. Hyman. Cambridge, Mass., & Jerusalem,
1986.
—, Tractatus de animae beatitudine. In Aristotle, Opera cum Averrois commentariis
[Giunta], vol. 9.
Avicenna, Liber Canonis. Venezia, 1507. Repr. Hildesheim, 1964.
—, Liber de anima. Ed. S. van Riet. 2 vols. Louvain & Leiden, 1968 &1972.
—, Liber de philosophia prima sive scientia divina. Ed. S. van Riet. 2 vols. Louvain,
1977 &1980.
Badaloni, N., La filosofia di Giordano Bruno. Firenze, 1955.
Badawı̄, Â., Aris.tūtālı̄s. Al-Tabı̄ â. Tarjamat Ishāq
. ibn Hunayn
. ma â shurūh. ibn
as-Samh. wa Ibn Âddı̄ wa Mattā ibn Yūnus wa abı̄ al-Faraj ibn al-Tayyib. 2 vols.
Cairo, 1964–1965.
Baier, J. J., Biographiae professorum medicinae, qui in Academia Altorfina unquam
vixerunt. Nürnberg, 1728.
Bakker, P. J. J. M., La raison et le miracle. Les doctrines eucharistiques (c. 1250–
6 bibliography
c. 1400. Contribution à l’étude des rapports entre philosophie et théologie. 2 vols.

Ph.D. thesis, Nijmegen University, 1999.
Bakker, P. J. J. M. & D.-J. Dekker, “Antoine Andrée ou Jean le Chanoine?
A propos de l’authenticité du commentaire de la Physique conservé dans
le Ms. Cambridge, Gonville and Caius Library 368 (590).” Bulletin de
philosophie médiévale 42 (2000), 101–131.
Baldini, U., Legem impone subactis. Studi su filosofia e scienza dei Gesuiti in Italia
1540–1632. Roma, 1992.
Barker, P., “The Role of Religion in the Lutheran Response to Copernicus.”
In Osler (ed.), Rethinking the Scientific Revolution, pp. 60–88.
Barnes, J., Aristotle. Oxford, 1982.
Aristotle, Posterior Analytics. Translated with Notes by J. Barnes. Oxford,
1975.
Barnes, J. & M. Mignucci (eds.), Matter and Metaphysics. Napoli, 1988.
Barnes, J. (ed.), Science and Speculation. Studies in Hellenistic Theory and Prac-
tice. Cambridge & Paris, 1982.
Barsanti, D., “I docenti e le cattedre dal 1543 al 1737.” In Amatori, Storia
dell’Università di Pisa, pp. 505–566.
Bates, D. (ed.), Knowledge and the Scholarly Medical Traditions. Cambridge,
1995.
Baudartius, G., Memorien of te cort verhael der ghedenckweerdighste soo kerckelijke
als wereltlijcke gehschiedenissen. 2 vols. 2nd ed. Arnhem, 1624/5.
Baudry, L., “En lisant Jean le Chanoine.” Archives d’histoire doctrinale et lit-
téraire du moyen âge, 9 (1934), 175–197.
Bazan, B. C., G. Fransen, D. Jacquart & J. W. Wippel (eds.), Les questions
disputées et les questions quodlibétiques dans les facultés de théologie, de droit et de
médecine. Turnhout, 1985.
Belaval, Y., Leibniz: Initiation à sa philosophie. Paris, 1962.
—, Leibniz: Initiation à sa philosophie, Paris, 1962.
Bellarmine, R., Controversiae de sacramento Eucharistiae. In Opera omnia. 12
vols. Paris, 1870–1874. Vol. 4. Paris, 1873.
—, Disputationes de controversiis Christiane fidei. 3 vols. Ingolstadt, 1587–1589.
Bellucci, D., Science de la Nature et Réformation. La Physique au service de la
Réforme dans l’enseignement de Philippe Melanchthon. Roma, 1998.
Benzi, U., In tribus libris microtechni Galeni expositio. Venezia, 1523.
Berggren, L. J., “The Correspondence of Abū Sahl al-Kūhı̄ and Abū Ishāq .
al-Sābı̄. A Translation with Commentaries.” Journal for the History of Arabic
Science, 7 (1983), 39–124.
Bernhardt, J., “La question du vide chez Hobbes.” Revue d’histoire des sci-
ences, 44 (1993), 225–232.
Berti, E., “Les méthodes d’argumentation et de démonstration dans la
Physique (apories, phénomènes, principes).” In De Gandt e.a. (eds.), La
physique d’Aristote, pp. 53–72.
Bérubé, C., La connaissance de l’individuel au Moyen Age. Montréal, 1964.
—, “La première école scotiste.” In Kaluza e.a. (eds.), Preuve et raisons à
l’université de Paris, pp. 9–24.
Biagioli, M., Galileo, Courtier. Chicago, 1993.
bibliography 7
Bianchi, L., “Una caduta senza declino? Considerazioni sulla crisi dell’aris-
totelismo fra Rinascimento ed età moderna.” In Domínguez e.a. (eds.),
Aristotelica et Lulliana, pp. 181–222.
Blackwell, C. & S. Kusukawa (eds.), Philosophy in the Sixteenth and Seven-
teenth Centuries. Conversations with Aristotle. Aldershot, 1999.
—, Philosophy in the Sixteenth and Seventeenth Centuries. Conversations with Aris-
totle. Aldershot, 1999.
Blum, P. R., Aristoteles bei Giordano Bruno. München, 1980.
Bolton, R., “Aristotle’s Method in Natural Science: Physics i.” In Judson
(ed.), Aristotle’s Physics, pp. ???.
Bos, E. P. (ed.), John Duns Scotus (1265/6–1308). Renewal of Philosophy. Am-
sterdam 1998.
Bossier, F., Filologisch-historische navorsingen over de Middeleeuwse en humanis-
tische Latijnse vertalingen van de Commentaren van Simplicius. Part i. Ph.D.
diss., University of Leuven. 1975.
Bovelles, C. de, Liber de intellectu. In Que hoc volumine contine[n]tur. Liber de
intellectu. Liber de sensu. Liber de nichilo. Ars oppositorum. [etc.], Paris, 1510.
Bowen, A. C., Science and Philosophy in Classical Greece. New York & London,
1991.
Boyle, R., Selected Philosophical Papers of Robert Boyle. Ed. M. A. Stewart. Indi-
anapolis, 1991.
—, The Works of the Honourable Robert Boyle. Ed. Th. Birch. 6 vols. London,
1772.
Brandt, F., Thomas Hobbes’ Mechanical Conception of Nature. København &
London, 1928.
Bricker, Ph. & R. I. G. Hughes (eds.), Philosophical Perspectives on Newtonian
Science. Cambridge, Mass., 1990.
Bruno, G., De la causa, principio et uno. Ed. G. Aquilecchia. Torino, 1973.
—, La cena de le ceneri. Ed. G. Aquilecchia. Torino, 1955.
—, Dialoghi italiani. Eds. G. Gentile & G. Aquilecchia. 2 vols. 3rd ed., Firenze,
1985.
—, Figuratio Aristotelis. Paris, 1586.
—, Opere latine conscripta. 3 vols. in 8 parts. Eds. F. Fiorentino, F. Tocco,
H. Vitelli. Napoli & Firenze, 1879–1891.
—, Praelectiones geometricae. Ed. G. Aquilecchia. Roma, 1964.
—, De umbris idearum. Ed. R. Sturlese. Firenze, 1991.
Buccaferrea, L., Explanatio libri i. Physicorum Aristotelis. Venezia, 1558.
Buck, A. (ed.), Die Rezeption der Antike. Zum Problem der Kontinuität zwischen
Mittelalter und Renaissance. Hamburg 1981.
Burnett, C. (ed.), Glosses and Commentaries on Aristotelian Logical Texts. The
Syriac, Arabic and Medieval Latin Traditions. London, 1993.
Burnett, C. & A. Mendelsohn., “Aristotle and Averroes on Method in
the Middle Ages and Renaissance: The ‘Oxford Gloss’ to the Physics and
Pietro d’Afeltro’s Expositio Proemi Averroys.” In Di Liscia e.a. (eds.), Method
and Order, pp. 53–111.
Bylebyl, J. J., “Medicine, Philosophy, and Humanism in Renaissance Italy.”
In Shirley e.a. (eds.), Science and the Arts, pp. 27–49.
8 bibliography
—, “The School of Padua: Humanistic Medicine in the Sixteenth Century.”

In Webster, Health, Medicine and Mortality, pp. 335–370.
Byrne, P. H., Analysis and Science in Aristotle New York, 1997.
Caelestinus, C., De his quae mundo mirabiliter eveniunt: ubi de sensuum er-
roribus, et potentiis animae ac de influentiis caelorum. Paris, 1542.
Calvin, J., Institutio Christianae religionis 1559, librum iv continens. Ed. P. Barth
and G. Niesel. München, 1936. (Opera selecta 5)
Canone, E. (ed.), Giordano Bruno. Gli anni napoletani e la “peregrinatio” euro-
pea. Cassino, 1992.
—, Letture bruniane iii. (forthcoming).
Carbone, L., Introductio in universam philosophiam. Venezia, 1599.
Cardano, G., Opus novum de proportionibus numerorum, motuum, ponderum,
sonorum, aliarumque rerum mensurandarum. Basel, 1570.
Caroti, S. & P. Souffrin (eds.), La nouvelle physique du xiv e siècle. Firenze,
1997.
Carrera y Artau, J., “Notas sobre el escotismo medieval en la provincia
franciscana de Aragon.” Antonianum, 40 (1965), 467–479.
Carriero, J., “Newton and Space and Time: Comments on J. E. McGuire.”
In Bricker e.a. (eds.), Philosophical Perspectives, pp. 109–133.
Cascio Pratilli, G., L’università e il principe. Gli studi di Siena e di Pisa tra
Rinascimento e Controriforma. Firenze, 1975.
Caston, V., “Epiphenomenalisms, Ancient and Modern.” The Philosophical
Review, 106 (1997), 309–363.
—, “Aristotle’s Two Intellects: A Modest Proposal,” Phronesis, 44 (1999),
199–228
Cesalpino, A., Quaestiones peripateticae. Venezia, 1593.
Chastel, A. (ed.), The Renaissance. Essays in Interpretation. London, 1982.
The Church Teaches: Documents of the Church in English Translation. Trans. and
ed. J. F. Clarkson, J. H. Edwards, W. J. Kelly, and J. J. Welch. St. Louis &
London, 1964.
Ciliberto, M. (ed.), Le fonti della filosofia di Giordano Bruno. cd-Rom, forth-
coming.
Clagett, M., The Science of Mechanics in the Middle Ages. 2nd edition. Madison,
Wisc., 1961.
Clauberg, J., Disputationes physicae. In Physica. Quibus rerum corporearum vis
et natura, mentis ad corpus relatae proprietates, denique corporis ac mentis arcta
et admirabilis in homine conjunctio explicantur. Amsterdam, 1664.
—, Opera omnia philosophica. 2 vols. Amsterdam, 1691. Repr. Hildesheim,
1968.
Cleary, J. J. (ed.), The Perennial Tradition of Neoplatonism. Leuven, 1998.
Cochrane, E., “Science and Humanism in the Italian Renaissance.” Ameri-
can Historical Review, 81 (1976), 1039–1057.
Cohen, H. F., The Scientific Revolution: A Historiographical Inquiry. Chicago,
1994.
—, The Scientific Revolution: a Historiographical Inquiry. Chicago, 1994.
Craemer-Ruegenberg, I. & A. Speer (eds.), Scientia und Ars im Hoch- und
Spätmittelalter. Berlin & New York, 1994.
bibliography 9
Crisciani, C., “History, Novelty, and Progress in Scholastic Medicine.”

Osiris, 2nd series, 6 (1990), 118–139.
—, “History, Novelty, and Progress in Scholastic Medicine,” Osiris, 2nd series,
6 (1990) 118–139.
Cristiani, A. (ed.), Sapere e/è potere. Discipline, dispute e professioni nell’univer-
sità medievale e moderna. Bologna, 1990.
Croese, I., Simplicius on Continuous and Instantaneous Change. Ph.D. diss.,
University of Utrecht, 1998.
Crombie, A. C., Medieval and Early Modern Science. 2 vols. Garden City, ny,
1959.
Crombie, A. C. (ed.), Scientific Change: Historical Studies in the Intellectual,
Social and Technical Conditions for Scientific Discovery and Technical Invention,
from Antiquity to the Present. New York, 1963.
Crosland, M. P. (ed.), The Emergence of Science in Western Europe. London,
1975.
Cross, R., The Physics of Duns Scotus. The Scientific Context of a Theological
Vision. Oxford, 1998.
Cublier de Beynac, J. & M. Magnien (eds.), Acta scaligeriana. Actes cu
Colloque international organisé pour le cinquième centenaire de la naissance de
Jules-César Scaliger. Agen, 1986.
Gentile da Foligno, Expositio et quaestiones super primo libro Microtechni
Galeni. In Torrigiano, Plus quam commentum. Venezia, 1557.
Giacomo da Forlì, Expositio et quaestiones in artem medicinalem Galeni.
Venezia, 1547.
Dalimier, C., “La saisie des principes physiques chez Aristote. Simplicius
contra Alexandre d’Aphrodise.” Oriens Occidens, 1 (1998), 77–94.
Dallari, U., I rotuli dei lettori, legisti e artisti dello Studio bolognese dal 1384 al
1799. 4 vols. Bologna, 1888–1924.
Damascius, Commentary on Plato’s “Phaedo”. Vol. 2 of The Greek Commentaries
on Plato’s “Phaedo”. Ed. L. G. Westerink. Amsterdam, 1977.
Davies, J., Florence and Its University During the Early Renaissance. Leiden, 1998.
Deason, G. B., “Reformation Theology and the Mechanistic Conception of
Nature.” In Lindberg e.a. (eds.), God & Nature, pp. 167–191.
Debus, A. G., The Chemical Philosophy. Paracelsian Science and Medicine in the
Sixteenth and Seventeenth Centuries. New York, 1977.
Debus, A. G. (ed.), Medicine in Seventeenth Century England. Berkeley, 1974.
Deferrari, R. J., M. I. Barry & I. McGuiness, A Lexicon of St. Thomas
Aquinas Based on the “Summa Theologica” and Selected Passages of His Other
Works. Baltimore, 1948.
Dekker, D.-J., De tijdfilosofie van Johannes Buridanus, Ph.D. thesis, University
of Nijmegen, 2002.
Del Gratta, R., “I docenti e le cattedre dal 1406 al 1543.” In Amatori,
Storia dell’Università di Pisa, pp. 481–502.
Del Punta, F., S. Donati & C. Trifogli, “Commentaries on Aristotle’s
Physics in Britain, ca. 1250–1270.” In Marenbon (ed.), Aristotle in Britain,
pp. 265–283.
Dell’Anna, G., “Marco Antonio Zimara e l’aristotelismo: Il problema del-
10 bibliography
la scienza nei Theoremata (1523).” In Roccaro, Platonismo e aristotelismo,

pp. 55–77.
Denziger, H. J. & A. Schönmetzer, Enchiridion symbolorum, definitionum et
declarationum de rebus ridei et morum. Freiburg i. Br., 1991.
Des Chene, D., Physiologia: Natural Philosophy in Late Aristotelian and Cartesian
Thought. Ithaca & London, 1996.
Descartes, R., Oeuvres de Descartes. Eds. Ch. Adam and P. Tannery. 13 vols.
Paris, 1897–1913.
—, Principia philosphiae. Amsterdam, 1644.
—, Principia philosophiae. Amsterdam, 1644.
Díaz Díaz, G., “Marbres, Juan.” In G. Díaz Díaz (ed.), Hombres y documen-
tos de la filosofía española, vol. 5, Madrid, 1995, pp. 151–152. In Díaz
Díaz (ed.), Hombres y documentos de la filosofía española, vol. 5, pp. 151–152.
Díaz Díaz, G. (ed.), Hombres y documentos de la filosofía española. Vol. 5,
Madrid, 1995.
Dodds, E. R., W. Theiler & P. Hadot (eds.), Les sources de Plotin. Genève,
1960.
Domínguez, F., R. Imbach, T. Pindl & P. Walter, Aristotelica et Lulliana, mag-
istro doctissimo Charles H. Lohr septuagesimum annum feliciter agenti dedicata.
Den Haag, 1995.
Donati, S., “Il commento alla Fisica di Adamo di Bocfeld e un commento
anonimo della sua scuola. Parte i.” Documenti e studi sulla tradizione filosofica
medievale, 9 (1998), 111–178.
—, “Il commento alla Fisica di Adamo di Bocfeld e un commento anon-
imo della sua scuola. Parte ii.” Documenti e studi sulla tradizione filosofica
medievale, 10 (1999), 233–297.
—, “La discussione sulle dimensioni indeterminate in un commento alla
Metafisica della fine del xiii secolo.” Medioevo, 25 (1999–2000), 237–312.
—, “La dottrina delle dimensioni indeterminate in Egidio Romano.” Medio-
evo, 14 (1988), 149–233.
—, “Materie und räumliche Ausdehnung in einigen ungedruckten
Physikkommentaren aus der Zeit von etwa 1250–1270.”
—, “Per lo studio dei commenti alla Fisica del xiii secolo. i: Commenti di
probabile origine inglese degli anni 1250–1270 ca. Parte i.” Documenti e
studi sulla tradizione filosofica medievale, 2 (1991), 361–441.
—, “Per lo studio dei commenti alla Fisica del xiii secolo. i: Commenti di
probabile origine inglese degli anni 1250–1270 ca. Parte ii.” Documenti e
studi sulla tradizione filosofica medievale, 4 (1993), 25–133.
—, “Physica i, 1: L’interpretazione dei commentatori inglesi della Translatio
Vetus e la loro recezione del commento di Averroè.” Medioevo, 21 (1995),
75–255.
—, “Studi per una cronologia delle opere di Egidio Romano. i: Le opere
prima del 1285 – I commenti aristotelici.” Documenti e studi sulla tradizione
filosofica medievale, 1 (1990), 1–111.
—, “‘Utrum accidens possit existere sine subiecto.’ Aristotelische Metaphysik
und christliche Theologie in den Physikkommentaren des 13. Jahrhun-
derts.” In Aertsen e.a. (eds.), Nach der Verurteilung von 1277, pp. 577–617.
bibliography 11
—, “Wissenschaft und Glaube bei der Frage nach dem Ursprung der Materie
in einigen ungedruckten Physikkommentaren aus dem 13. bis zum An-
fang des 14. Jahrhunderts.” In Craemer-Ruegenberg e.a. (eds.), Scientia
und Ars, pp. 399–420.
Drachmann, A. G., “Fragments from Archimedes in Hero’s Mechanics.”
Centaurus, vol. 8 (1963), 91–146.
Duhem, P., Le système du monde. 10 vols. Vol. 1–5, Paris, 1913–1917. Repr.
Paris, 1954. Vols. 6–10, Paris, 1954–1959.
Durling, R. J., “A Chronological Census of Renaissance Editions and Trans-
lations of Galen.” Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes, 24 (1961),
230–305.
Ebbesen, S., “Medieval Latin Glosses and Commentaries on Aristotelian
Logical Texts of the Twelfth and Thirteenth Centuries.” In Burnett (ed.),
Glosses and Commentaries, pp. 129–177.
Elswich, J. H. ab, De varia Aristotelis in scholis protestantium fortuna
schediasma In De Launoy, De varia Aristotelis in Academia Parisiensi fortuna,
pp. 3–112.
Emerton, N. E., The Scientific Reinterpretation of Form. Ithaca, 1984.
Etzkorn, G. J., “Note sur Jean le Chanoine, alias Petrus Casuelis, ofm.”
Bulletin de philosophie médiévale, 23 (1981), 93.
Fabroni, A., Historia Academiae Pisanae, 3 vols. Pisa, 1791. Repr. Bologna,
1971.
Niccolò Falcucci, Sermones medicinales. Venezia, 1533.
Feuerlin, J. W., Taurellus defensus. Nürnberg, 1734.
Fisher, N. W. & S. Unguru, “Experimental Science and Mathematics in
Roger Bacon’s Thought.” Traditio, 27 (1971), 353–378.
Fortenbaugh, W., A. Baker, R. W. Sharples, D. Gutas & P. M. Huby,
Theophrastus of Eresus. Sources for his Life, Writings, Thought and Influence.
[[still in publication]]. Leiden, 1993–.
Foucher de Careil, A., Mémoire sur la philosophie de Leibniz. Paris, 1905.
Francis of Marchia, Sententia et compilatio super libros Physicorum Aristotelis.
Ed. N. Mariani. Grottaferrata, 1998.
Frede, M., “The Original Notion of Cause.” In Schofield (eds.), Doubt and
Dogmatism, pp. 217–249.
Freeland, C. A., “Scientific Explanation and Empirical Data in Aristotle’s
Meteorology.” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy, 8 (1990), 67–102.
French, R. K., “Berengario da Carpi and Commentary in Anatomical Teach-
ing.” In Wear e.a. (eds.), The Medical Renaissance, pp. 42–77.
Fritsche, J., Methode und Beweisziel im ersten Buch der “Physikvorlesung” des
Aristoteles. Frankfurt, 1986.
Fromondus, L., Labyrinthus sive de compositione continui liber unus. Antwerpen,
1631.
Galen, Ars medica. Introduction, texte critique, traduction et commentaire
V. Boudon-Millot. Ph.D. diss. Paris, 1990.
—, Opera omnia. Ed. C. G. Kühn. 22 vols. Leipzig, 1821–1833.
—, Selected Works. Translated with an Introduction and Notes by P. N. Singer.
Oxford & New York, 1997.
12 bibliography
Galilei, G., Two New Sciences. A New Translation with Introduction and
Notes by Stillman Drake. Madison, 1974.
Gandt, F. de, “Force et science des machines.” In Barnes (ed.), Science and
Speculation, pp. 96–127.
Gandt, F. de & P. Souffrin, La physique d’Aristote et les conditions d’une sci-
ence de la nature. Actes du Colloque organisé par le Séminaire d’Épistémologie et
d’Histoire des Sciences de Nice. Paris, 1991.
Garber, D., “Leibniz and the Foundations of Physics. The Middle Years.” In
Okruhlik e.a. (eds.), Natural Philosophy of Leibniz, pp. 27–130.
—, “Leibniz on Form and Matter.” In Lüthy e.a. (eds.), The Fate of Hylomor-
phism.
—, “Leibniz. Physics and Philosophy” In Jolley (ed.), Cambridge Companion
to Leibniz, pp. 270–352.
—, “Motion and Metaphysics in the Young Leibniz.” In Hooker (ed.), Leibniz,
pp. 60–84.
Garber, D. & M. Ayers (eds.), The Cambridge History of Seventeenth-Century
Philosophy. Cambridge, 1998.
García-Ballester, L., “Artifex factivus sanitatis: Health and Medical Care
in Medieval Latin Galenism.” In Bates (ed.), Knowledge and the Medical
Traditions, pp. 127–150.
—, “The Construction of a New Form of Learning and Practicing Medicine
in Medieval Latin Europe.” Science in Context, 8 (1995), 75–102.
Garin, E., “La concezione dell’università in Italia nell’età del Rinascimen-
to.” In Les universités européennes, pp. 84–93.
Garin, E. (ed.), La disputa delle arti nel Quattrocento. Firenze, 1947.
Gassendi, P., Dissertations en forme de paradoxes contre les Aristotéliciens. Livres i
et ii. Ed. and trans. B. Rochot. Paris, 1959.
—, The Selected Works of Pierre Gassendi. Ed. and trans. C. B. Bush. New York,
1972.
Gensler, M., “The Concept of Vacuum in a Scotist ‘Physics’-Commentary
Attributed to Antonius Andreae.” In Aertsen e.a. (eds.), Raum und
Raumvorstellungen, pp. 168–178.
Genua, M., In tres libros Aristotelis De anima exactissimi commentarii. Venezia,
1576.
Gerald of Odo, Opera logica. Ed. L. M. de Rijk, Leiden, 1997.
Gerhardus, J., Methodus studii theologici publicis praelectionibus in Academia
Jenensi anno 1617 exposita. Jena, 1620.
Gherardi, A. (ed.), Statuti dell’Università e studio fiorentino dell’anno 1387
seguita da un’appendice di documenti dal 1320–1472. Firenze, 1881.
Giard, L., “Remapping Knowledge, Reshaping Institutions.” In Pumfrey e.a.
(eds.), Science, Culture and Popular Belief, pp. 19–47.
Giard, L. (ed.), Les jésuites à la Renaissance. Système éducatif et production du
savoir. Paris, 1995.
Gilbert, N., “Renaissance Aristotelianism and Its Fate: Some Observations
and Problems.” In Anton (ed.), Naturalism and Historical Understanding,
pp. 42–52.
Giles of Rome, Commentaria in octo libros Physicorum Aristotelis. Venezia, 1502.
bibliography 13
Repr. Frankfurt, 1968.

Gillispie, C. C. (ed.), Dictionary of Scientific Biography. 18 vols. New York,
1970–1990.
Goclenius, R., Adversaria ad exotericos aliquot Julii Caesaris Scaligeri acutissimi
philosophi exercitationes. Marburg, 1594.
Gomarus, F., Theses theologicae de Coena Domini. Disputation defended by Ch.
Hellerus. Leiden, 1603.
Gorlaeus, D., Exercitationes philosophicae post mortem auctoris editae, quibus
universa fere discutitur philosophia theoretica, et plurima ac praecipua Peripateti-
corum dogmata evertuntur. Leiden, 1620.
—, Idea physicae. Utrecht, 1651.
Gotthelf, A. & J. G. Lennox (eds.), Philosophical Issues in Aristotle’s Biology.
Cambridge & New York, 1987.
Gouhier, H., Cartésianisme et augustinisme au xvii e siècle. Paris, 1978.
Grafton, A., “The Availability of Ancient Works.” In Schmitt e.a. (eds.), The
Cambridge History of Renaissance Philosophy, pp. 767–791.
Graham, D. W., “The Paradox of Prime Matter.” Journal of the History of
Philosophy, 25 (1987), 475–490.
Granada, M. A., “Esser spogliato dall’umana perfezione e giustizia. Nueva
evidencia de la presencia de Averroes en la obra y en el proceso de
Giordano Bruno.” Bruniana & Campanelliana, 5 (1999), 305–331.
—, “Giordano Bruno e l’interpretazione della tradizione filosofica: l’aris-
totelismo e il cristianesimo di fronte all’antica vera filosofia.” In Armo-
gathe e.a. (eds.), L’interpretazione, pp. 59–82.
Grant, E., “Jean Buridan and Nicole Oresme on Natural Knowledge.” Vi-
varium, 31 (1993), 84–105.
—, Much Ado about Nothing: Theories of Space and Vacuum from the Middle Ages
to the Scientific Revolution. Cambridge, 1981.
—, “Science and the Medieval University.” In Kittelson e.a. (eds.), Rebirth,
Reform and Resilience, pp. 68–102.
—, A Source Book in Medieval Science. Cambridge, Mass., 1974.
—, “Ways to Interpret the Terms ‘Aristotelian’ and ‘Aristotelianism’ in Me-
dieval and Renaissance Natural Philosophy.” History of Science, 25 (1987),
335–358.
Graverus, A., Analysis quaestionum quarundum theologophysicarum de localitate,
illocalitate et omnipraesentia corporis Christi thesibus illigata et contemplatione
physicae M. Bartholomaei Keckermanni philosophi Heidelbergensis opposita [ ]
In quo solide argumenta Calviniorum physica, quibus corpus Christi tantum loco
alligare solent, discutiuntur. Wittenberg, 1599.
Gruner, O. C., A Treatise on The Canon of Medicine of Avicenna. Incorporating
a Translation of the First Book. London, 1930.
Guthrie, W. K. C., A History of Greek Philosophy. 6 vols. Vol. 4: Aristotle: An
Encounter. Cambridge, 1981.
Haas, F. A. J. de, “Aristotle’s Fourteenth Aporia and the Three Dimensions
in Later Neoplatonism.” In Cleary (ed.), The Perennial Tradition of Neopla-
tonism, pp. 347–368 .
—, John Philoponus’ New Definition of Prime Matter. Aspects of its Background in
14 bibliography
Neoplatonism and the Ancient Commentary Tradition. Leiden, 1997.

—, “Mixture in Philoponus: An Encounter with the Third Kind of Potential-
ity.” In Thijssen e.a. (eds.), The Commentary Tradition, pp. 21–46.
—, “Philoponus on Theophrastus on Composition in Nature.” In Van
Ophuijsen e.a. (eds.), Theophrastus, pp. 171–189.
—, “Review of D. A. di Liscia e.a. (eds.), Method and Order.” Renaissance Studies
13 (1999), 349–352.
Hackett, J. (ed.), Roger Bacon and the Sciences: Commemorative Essays. Leiden,
1997.
Hackett, J., “Roger Bacon on Scientia experimentalis.” In Hackett (ed.), Roger
Bacon and the Sciences, pp. 277–315.
Hadot, I. (ed.), Simplicius. Sa vie, son oeuvre, sa survie. Berlin & New York,
1987.
Hall, R., “Al-Khāzinı̄.” In Gillispie (ed.), Dictionary of Scientific Biography,
vol. 7, pp. 334–351.
Harris, C. R. S., Duns Scotus. 2 vols. Oxford, 1927.
Hellyer, M., The Last of the Aristotelians. The Transformtion of Jesuit Physics in
Germany, 1630–1773. Ph.D. thesis, University of California at San Diego,
1998.
Henricus Bate, Speculum divinorum et quorundam naturalium. Parts iv–v: On
the Nature of Matter; On the intellect as form of man. Ed. C. Steel. Leuven,
1993.
Henry, J. & S. Hutton, New Perspectives in Renaissance Thought: Essays in the
History of Science, Education and Philoosphy. London, 1990.
Henry of Ghent, “Quodlibet iii, Quaestio xi – Utrum tempus possit esse
sine anima.” In Jeck, Aristoteles contra Augustinum, pp. 461–476.
Henry, P., “Une comparison chez Aristote, Alexandre et Plotin.” In Dodds
e.a. (eds.), Les sources de Plotin, pp. 427–449.
Hero of Alexandria, Mechanik und Katoptrik. Eds. L. Nix & W. Schmidt. Vol.
2 of Heronis Alexandrini Opera quae supersunt omnia (5 vols., 1899–1914).
Leipzig, 1900.
—, Les Mécaniques ou l’Elévateur des corps lourds. Texte arabe de Qust. ā ibn
Lūqā établi et traduit par B. Carra de Vaux, introduction de D. R. Hill et
commentaires par A. G. Drachmann. Paris, 1988.
Heuermann, G., Geschichte des reformirten gräflich Bentheimschen Gymansium
Illustre Arnoldinum zu Burgsteinfurt. Burgsteinfurt, 1878.
Hilgenfeld, H., Mittelalterlich-traditionelle Elemente in Luthers Abendmahls-
schriften. Zürich, 1971.
Hill, D. R., The Book of Knowledge of Ingenious Mechanical Devices. An Annotated
Translation of al-Jazarı̄’s Treatise. Dordrecht, 1974.
—, Islamic Science and Engineering. Edinburgh, 1993.
Hobbes, Th., The English Works. Ed. W. Molesworth. Vol. 1: Concerning Body.
London, 1839. Repr. Aalen, 1966.
—, Critique du De Mundo de Thomas White. Eds. J. Jacquot & H. Whitmore
Jones. Paris, 1973.
—, Thomas White’s “De Mundo” Examined. Trans. H. Whitmore Jones. London,
1976.
bibliography 15
Hochstetter, E, “Leibniz-Interpretation.” Revue de métaphysique et de morale,

20 (1966), 174–192.
Hoenen, M. J. F. M., “Scotus and the Scotist School. The Tradition of Scotist
Thought in the Medieval and Early Modern Period.” In Bos (ed.), John
Duns Scotus, pp. 197–210.
—, “Thomismus, Skotismus und Albertismus. Das Entstehen und die Be-
deutung von philosophischen Schulen im späten Mittelalter.” Bochumer
Philosophisches Jahrbuch für Antike und Mittelalter, 2 (1997), 81–103.
Hoenen, M. J. F. M. & J. H. J. Schneider (eds.), Philosophy and Learning.
Universities in the Middle Ages. Leiden, 1995.
Honnefelder, L., “Scotus und der Scotismus. Ein Beitrag zur Bedeutung
der Schulbildung in der mittelalterlichen Philosophie.” In Hoenen e.a.
(eds.), Philosophy and Learning, pp. 249–262.
Hooker, M. (ed.), Leibniz: Critical and Interpretative Essays. Manchester, 1982.
Hooykaas, R., Religion and the Rise of Modern Science. Grand Rapids, 1972.
Hornius, G, Historiae philosophicae libri septem, quibus de origini successione,
sectis et vita philosophorum ab orbe condito ad nostram aetatem agitur. Leiden,
1655.
Houtsma, M. T. (ed.), First Encyclopaedia of Islam. 9 vols. Leiden, 1913–1938.
Repr. Leiden, 1993
Hugonnard-Roche, H., “L’hypothétique et la nature dans la physique
parisienne du xive siècle.” In Caroti e.a. (eds.), La nouvelle physique,
pp. 161–177.
Hyman, A., “Aristotle’s ‘First Matter’ and Avicenna’s and Averroes’ ‘Corpo-
real Form.’” In Hyman (ed.), Essays in Medieval Jewish and Islamic Philosophy,
pp. 335–356.
Hyman, A. (ed.), Essays in Medieval Jewish and Islamic Philosophy. New York,
1977.
Ibel, T., Die Wage im Altertum und Mittelalter. Erlangen, 1908.
Ibn abı̄ \Usaybi
. â, M., Ûyūn al-anbā fı̄ .tabaqāt al-atibbā \. Ed. Niz. ar Ridā.
. Bayrūt,
1965.
Ibn al-Nadim, Kitāb al Fihrist. 2 vols. Eds. G. Flügel, J. Roediger & A. Müller.
Leipzig, 1871–1872.
Ibn al-Qiftı̄, . Tārı̄kh al-hukamā
. \. Ed. J. Lippert. Leipzig, 1903.
Ibn Fātik, al-M., Mukhtār al-hikam . wa mahāsin
. al-kalim. Ed. Â. Badawı̄.
Madrid, 1958.
check Ierodiakonou, K., “Aspasius on Perfect and Imperfect Virtues.”
(pagina’s?) In Alberti e.a. (eds.), Aspasius, pp.?.
Ignatius de Loyola, Constitutiones Societatis Iesu. 4 vols. (Roma, 1934–
1938). Vol. 3: Textus latinus. Ed. A. Codina. Roma, 1938.
—, Exercitia Spiritualia. Eds. I. Calveras & C. de Damases. Roma, 1969.
The Iudgement of the Synode Holden at Dort, Concerning the five Articles. As also
their sentence touching Conradus Vorstius. London, 1619.
Ivry, A. L., “Averroes on Intellection and Conjunction.” Journal of the Amer-
ican Oriental Society, 86 (1966), 76–85.
Jackson, D. E. P., The Arabic Version of the Mathematical Collection of Pappus
Alexandrinus Book viii. Ph. D. dissertation. Cambridge, 1970.
16 bibliography
Jacquart, D., “La question disputée dans les facultés de médecine.” In

Bazan e.a. (eds.), Les questions disputées, pp. 279–315.
Jaeger, F. M., “Over David van Goorle als Atomist, en over het Geslacht van
Goorle in Noord-Nederland.” Oud-Holland, 36 (1918), 205–242.
Jammer, M., Concepts of Space. The History of Theories of Space in Physics. 3rd.
enlarged edition. Mineola, N.Y., 1993.
Jaouiche, K., Le livre du qaras.tūn de Thābit ibn Qurra. Etude sur l’origine de la
notion de travail et du calcul du moment statique d’une barre homogène. Leiden,
1976.
Jardine, N., “Keeping Order in the School of Padua: Jacopo Zabarella and
Francesco Piccolomini on the Offices of Philosophy.” In Di Liscia e.a.
(eds.), Method and Order, pp. 183–209.
Jeck, U. R., Aristoteles contra Augustinum. Zur Frage nach dem Verhältnis von Zeit
und Seele bei den antiken Aristoteleskommentatoren, im arabischen Aristotelismus
und im 13. Jahrhundert. Amsterdam, 1994.
—, “Tempus continuum – tempus discretum. Zum Problem der Kontinuität
der Zeit in der Philosophie des Johannes Duns Scotus und der Scotisten.”
In Alliez (ed.), Metamorphosen der Zeit, pp. 261–275.
Johannes Stobaeus, Anthologium. vols. i–ii: Libri duo priores, qui inscribi solent
Eclogae physicae et ethicae, ed. C. Wachsmuth. iii–v: Libri duo posteriores, vol.
i–iii, ed. O. Hense. 5 vols. Berlin, 1884–1912.
John Buridan, In Metaphysicen Aristotelis questiones. Paris, 1518. Repr. Frank-
furt, 1964.
—, Quaestiones super libris quattuor De caelo et mundo. Ed. E. A. Moody. Cam-
bridge, Mass., 1942. Repr. Cambridge, Mass., 1970.
—, Quaestiones super octo Physicorum libros Aristotelis, secundum ultimam lecturam.
Paris, 1509. Repr. Frankfurt, 1968.
John Duns Scotus, Quaestiones in iv libros sententiarum. In Opera omnia. Ed.
Wadding. Vol. 16. Paris, 1904.
John Philoponus, On Aristotle On Coming-to-Be and Perishing. 1.6–2.4. Trans.
C. J. F. Williams. London, 1999.
—, Commentaria in libros De anima Aristotelis. Venezia, 1535.
—, Corollaries on Place and Void. Trans. D. Furley & C. Wildberg. London,
1991.
—, In Aristotelis Analytica Posteriora commentaria. Ed. M. Wallis. Berlin, 1909.
—, In Aristotelis De anima libros commentaria. Ed. M. Hayduck. Berlin, 1897.
(Commentaria in Aristotelem graeca, 15)
—, In Aristotelis libros De generatione et corruptione commentaria. Ed. H. Vitelli,
Berlin, 1897. (Commentaria in Aristotelem graeca, 14/2)
—, In Aristotelis Physicorum libros tres priores commentaria. Ed. H. Vitelli. Berlin,
1887. (Commentaria in Aristotelem graeca, 16)
—, In tres libros De anima Aristotelis breves annotationes. Venezia, 1544.
John the Canon, Quaestiones super octo libros Physicorum Aristotelis. Venezia,
1520.
Jolley, N., (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Leibniz. Cambridge, 1995.
Jope, J., “Subordinate Demonstrative Science in the Sixth Book of Aristotle’s
Physica.” Classical Quarterly, 22 (1972), 279–292.
bibliography 17
Joutsivuo, T., Scholastic Tradition and Humanist Innovation. A Concept of Neu-

trum in Renaissance Medicine. Saarijärvi, 1999.
Judson, L. (ed.), Aristotle’s Physics. A Collection of Essays. Oxford, 1991.
Kaluza, Z. & P. Vignaux (eds.), Preuve et raisons à l’université de Paris. Logique,
ontologie et théologie au xiv e siècle. Paris, 1984.
Keckermann, B., Contemplatio gemina. In Opera omnia. Vol. 1. Genève, 1614.
Kenny, A. & J. Pinborg, “Medieval Philosophical Literature.” In Kretzmann
e.a. (eds.), The Cambridge History of Later Medieval Philosophy, pp. 11–42.
Kessler, E., “The Transformation of Aristotelianism during the Renais-
sance.” In J. Henry e.a. (eds.), New Perspectives in Renaissance Thought,
pp. 137–147.
—, “Introducing Aristotle to the Sixteenth Century. The Lefèvre Enterprise.”
In Blackwell e.a. (eds.), Conversations with Aristotle, pp. ?.
—, “Method in the Aristotelian Tradition: Taking a Second Look.” In Di
Liscia e.a. (eds.), Method and Order, pp. 113–142.
—, “Von der Psychologie zur Methodenlehre.” Zeitschrift für philosophische
Forschung, 41(1987), 548–570.
Kessler, E., C. Lohr & W. Sparn, Aristotelismus und Renaissance: In Memoriam
Charles B. Schmitt. Wiesbaden, 1988.
Khāzinı̄, al, Â., Kitāb mozān al-hikma.
. Hyderabad, 1940.
King, L. S., “The Transformation of Galenism.” In Debus (ed.), Medicine,
pp. 7–32.
Kittelson, J. M. & P. J. Transue, Rebirth, Reform and Resilience: Universities
in Transition 1300–1700. Columbus, Ohio, 1984.
Knorr, W. R., Ancient Sources of the Medieval Tradition of Mechanics. Greek,
Arabic and Latin Studies of the Balance. Firenze, 1982.
Kollesch, J., “Anschauungen von den ‘arkai’ in der Ars medica und die
Seelenlehre Galens.” In Manuli e.a. (eds.), Le opere psicologiche di Galeno,
pp. 215–230.
Konstan, D., “A Note on Aristotle Physics i.1.” Archiv für Geschichte der Philoso-
phie, 57 (1975), 241–245.
Koyré, A., Etudes galiléennes. Paris, 1966.
Krafft, F., “Guericke (Gericke), Otto von.” In Gillespie (ed.), Dictionary of
Scientific Biography, vol. 5 (1972), 574–576.
—, Dynamische und statische Betrachtungsweise in der antiken Mechanik. Wies-
baden, 1970.
Kraus, J., Quaestiones de universalibus magistrorum Crathorn, anonymi, Ioannis
Canonici. Opuscula et textus historiam Ecclesiae eiusque vitam atque doctrinam
illustrantia. Münster, 1937.
Kraye, J., “Renaissance Commentaries on the Nicomachean Ethics.” In Weijers
(ed.), Vocabulary of Teaching, pp. 96–117.
Kretzman, N. (ed.), Infinity and Continuity in Ancient and Medieval Thought.
Ithaca & London.
Kretzmann, N., A. Kenny & J. Pinborg (eds.), The Cambridge History of Later
Medieval Philosophy. Cambridge, 1982.
Krook, D., John Sargeant and his Circle. A Study of Three Seventeenth-Century
English Aristotelians. Leiden, 1993.
18 bibliography
Kuksewicz, Z., “Une seconde version des Quaestiones super Physicam de Gilles
d’Orléans retrouvée.” Mediaevalia Philosophica Polonorum, 32 (1994), 3–32.
—, “Ein unbekanntes Werk von Aegidius von Orléans. Quaestiones super
Physicam.” Mediaevalia Philosophica Polonorum, 31 (1992), 3–21.
Kusukawa, S., The Transformation of Natural Philosophy. The Case of Philip
Melanchthon. Cambridge, 1995.
—, “Lutheran Uses of Aristotle. A Comparison between Jacob Schegk and
Philip Melanchthon.” In Blackwell e.a. (eds.), Philosophy in the Sixteenth
and Seventeenth Centuries, pp. 169–188.
Laird, W. R., “Galileo and the Mixed Sciences.” In Di Liscia e.a. (eds.),
Method and Order, pp. 253–270.
—, The ‘scientiae mediae’ in Medieval Commentaries on Aristotle’s Posterior Analyt-
ics. Ph.D. diss. University of Toronto, 1983.
Laks, A., “Le début d’une physique: Ordre, exposition et nature des frag-
ments 142–144 a/b de Théophraste.” In Van Ophuijsen e.a. (eds.),
Theophrastus, pp. 143–169.
Lang, H., The Order of Nature in Aristotle’s Physics. Place and the Elements.
Cambridge, 1998.
Langford, J. L., Galileo, Science, and the Church. Rev. ed. Ann Arbor, 1971.
Largier, N., Zeit, Zeitlichkeit, Ewigkeit. Ein Aufriss des Zeitproblems bei Dietrich
von Freiberg und Meister Eckhart. Bern, 1989.
Lasswitz, K., Geschichte der Atomistik vom Mittelalter bis Newton. 2 vols. Ham-
burg and Leipzig, 1890. Repr. Hildesheim, 1984.
Launoy, J. de, De varia Aristotelis in Academia Parisiensi fortuna. Ed. ab Elswich.
Wittenberg, 1720.
Lawn, B., The Rise and Decline of the Scholastic ‘Quaestio disputata’ with Special
Emphasis on its Use in the Teaching of Medicine and Science. Vol. 2. Leiden,
1993.
Laymon, R., “Transsubstantiation: Test Case for Descartes’s Theory of
Space.” In Lennon e.a. (eds.), Problems of Cartesianism, pp. 149–170.
Le Blond, J. M., Logique et méthode chez Aristote. Étude sur la recherche des
principes dans la physique aristotélicienne. Paris, 1939.
Leibniz, G. W., New Essays on Human Understanding. Trans. P. Remnant &
J. Bennett. Cambridge, 1982.
—, Mathematische Schriften. Ed. C. I. Gerhardt. 7 vols. Berlin, 1848–1863.
Repr. Hildesheim, 1962.
Leibniz, G. W., Die Philosophischen Schriften. Ed. C. I. Gerhardt. 7 vols. Berlin,
1875–1890. Repr. Hildesheim, 1978.
—, Sämtliche Schriften und Briefe. Ed. Deutsche Akademie der Wissenschaften.
Berlin, 1923–.
Leibniz, G. W. & S. Clark, The Leibniz-Clarke Correspondence. Ed. H.
G. Alexander. New York, 1956.
Leijenhorst, C., “Jesuit Concepts of Spatium Imaginarium and Thomas
Hobbes’s Doctrine of Space.” Early Science and Medicine, 1 (1996), 355–
380.
—, Hobbes and the Aristotelians: The Aristotelian Setting of Thomas Hobbes’s Natural
Philosophy. Utrecht, 1998.
bibliography 19
Leinkauf, T., Il Neoplatonismo di Francesco Patrizi come presupposto della sua

critica ad Aristotele. Firenze, 1992.
Leinsle, U. G., Das Ding und die Methode. Methodische Konstitution und Gegen-
stand der frühen protestantischen Metaphysik. 2 vols. Augsburg, 1985.
—, Reformversuche protestantischer Metaphysik im Zeitalter des Rationalismus.
Augsburg, 1988.
Lennon, Th. M., J. M. Nicholas, J. W. Davis (eds.), Problems of Cartesianism.
Kingston & Montréal, 1982.
Lennox, J. G., “Between Data and Demonstration: The Analytics and the
Historia animalium.” In Bowen (ed.), Science and Philosophy, pp. 261–294.
—, “Divide and Explain: The Posterior Analytics in Practice.” In Gotthelf e.a.
(eds.), Philosophical Issues, pp. 90–119.
—, “Kinds, Forms of Kinds, and the More and the Less in Aristotle’s Biology.”
In Gotthelf e.a. (eds.), Philosophical Issues, pp.?.
Les universités européennes du xiv e au xviii e siècle. Genève, 1967.
Lettinck, P., Aristotle’s Physics and its Reception in the Arabic World. Leiden,
1994.
Liddell, H. J., R. Scott, & H. S. Jones, A Greek-English Lexicon. 9th ed.
Oxford, 1996.
Lindberg, D. C., Roger Bacon’s Philosophy of Nature. A critical edition, with
English translation, introduction, and notes, of De multiplicatione specierum
and De speculis comburentibus. Oxford, 1983.
Lindberg, D. C. & R. L. Numbers (eds.), God & Nature. Historical Essays on
the Encounter between Christianity and Science. Berkeley, 1982.
Lines, D. A., “The Importance of Being Good: Moral Philosophy in the
Italian Universities, 1300–1600.” Rinascimento, 35 (1996), 139–193.
—, Teachers of Arts and Medicine in the Italian Universities, ca. 1350–1630. (Elec-
tronic database; first release, 2000: Bologna, Firenze, Padova, and Pavia,
1350–1400).
Di Liscia, D. A., E. Kessler & C. Methuen (eds.), Method and Order in Re-
naissance Philosophy of Nature. The Aristotle Commentary Tradition. Aldershot,
1997.
Lloyd, A. C., The Anatomy of Neoplatonism. Oxford, 1990.
Lloyd, G. E. R, Aristotle: The Growth and Structure of His Thought. Cambridge,
1968.
—, Polarity and Analogy. Cambridge, 1966.
Lohr, C. H., “Aristotelica Britannica.” Theologie und Philosophie, 53 (1978),
79–101.
—, Latin Aristotle Commentaries: i. Medieval Latin Aristotle Commentaries
(Traditio, 23–30, 1967–1974); ii. Renaissance Authors (Firenze, 1988);
iii. Index initiorum, Index finium (Firenze, 1995).
—, “The Sixteenth-Century Transformation of the Aristotelian Natural Phi-
losophy.” In Kessler e.a. (eds.), Aristotelismus und Renaissance, pp. 89–99.
Lokert, G. (ed.), Questiones et decisiones physicales insignium virorum. Paris,
1518.
Lukács, L. (ed.), Monumenta paedagogica Societatis Jesu. 7 vols. Roma, 1965–
1992.
20 bibliography
Luther, M., D. Martin Luthers Werke. Kritische Gesamtausgabe, 69 vols. to

date Weimar, 1883–.
—, De captivitate Babylonicae ecclesiae. In D. Martin Luthers Werke. Vol. 6 (1888),
pp. xxx.
—, Das Marburger Gespräch. In D. Martin Luthers Werke. Vol. 30/iii (1910),
pp. 92–171.
—, Vom Abendmahl Chisti, Bekenntnis. In D. Martin Luthers Werke. Vol. 26
(1909), pp. 241–509.
Lüthy, C. H., “An Aristotelian Watchdog as Avant-Garde Physicist. Julius
Caesar Scaliger.” The Monist, 84 (2001), 542–561.
—, “David Gorlaeus’ Atomism, or: The Marriage of Protestant Metaphysics
with Italian Natural Philosophy.” In Lüthy e.a. (eds.), Late Medieval and
Early Modern Corpuscular Matter Theories, pp. 245–290.
Lüthy, C. H. & W. R. Newman, “Daniel Sennert’s Earliest Writings (1599–
1600) and their Debt to Giordano Bruno.” Bruniana & Campanelliana, 6
(2000), 261–280.
Lüthy, C. H. & W. R. Newman (eds.), The Fate of Hylomorphism. “Matter” and
“Form” in Early Modern Science. Special issue of Early Science and Medicine
(3/3), Leiden, 1997.
Lüthy, C. H., J. E. Murdoch, & W. R. Newman (eds.), Late Medieval and
Early Modern Corpuscular Matter Theories. Leiden, 2001.
McClaughlin, T., “Censorship and Defenders of the Cartesian Faith in
Mid-Seventeenth Century France.” Journal of the History of Ideas, 40 (1979),
563–581.
McCue, J. F., “The Doctrine of Transubstantiaon from Berengar through
Trent: The Point at Issue.” Harvard Theological Review, 61 (1968), 385–430.
McDonnell, K., John Calvin, the Church, and the Eucharist. Princeton, 1967.
McGuire, J. E., “Predicates of Pure Existence: Newton on God’s Space and
Time.” In Bricker e.a. (eds.), Philosophical Perspectives, pp. 91–108.
—, Tradition and Innovation. Newton’s Metaphysics of Nature. Dordrecht, 1995.
McKirahan Jr., R. D., “Aristotle’s Subordinate Sciences.” The British Journal
for the History of Science, 11 (1978), 197–220.
—, Principles and Proofs. Aristotle’s Theory of Demonstrative Science. Princeton,
1992.
Maclean, I., “The Interpretation of Natural Signs: Cardano’s De Subtilitate
versus Scaliger’s Exercitationes.” In Vickers (ed.), Occult and Scientific Men-
talities, pp. 231–251.
McMullin, E., The Inference That Makes Science. Milwaukee, 1992.
McMullin, E. (ed.), The Concept of Matter in Greek and Medieval Philosophy.
Notre Dame, Indiana, 1965.
Madonia, C., “Simone Simoni.” Bibliotheca dissidentium, 9 (1988), 25–110.
Magnien, M., “Bibliographie scaligérienne.” In Cublier de Beynac e.a.
(eds.), Acta scaligeriana, pp. 293–332.
Mahoney, E., “John of Jandun and Agostino Nifo on Human Felicity (‘Sta-
tus’).” In Wenin (ed.), L’homme et son univers, pp. 465–477.
Maier, A., Die Vorläufer Galileis im 14. Jahrhundert. Roma, 1966.
—, Ausgehendes Mittelalter.Vol. i. Roma, 1964.
bibliography 21
—, “Das Problem der quantitas materiae in der Scholastik.” Gregorianum, 27

(1946), 89–109. Repr. Maier, Die Vorläufer Galileis, pp. 26–52.
—, “Verschollene Aristoteleskommentare des 14. Jahrhunderts.” In Maier,
Ausgehendes Mittelalter (i), pp. 237–264.
—, “Verschollene Aristoteleskommentare des 14. Jahrhunderts”, in: Autour
d’Aristote. Recueil d’études de philosophie ancienne et médiévale offert à Mon-
seigneur A. Mansion. Louvain,1955. 515—-541. Repr. in Maier, Ausgehen-
des Mittelalter (i), pp. 237–264.
—, Die Vorläufer Galileis im 14. Jahrhundert. Roma, 1949. 2nd ed. Roma, 1966.
Maierù, A., A. Paravicini Bagliani (eds.), Studi sul xiv secolo in memoria di
A. Maier. Roma, 1981.
Mainetti, M., Commentaria in librum Aristotelis De sensu et sensibili. Firenze,
1555.
Manardi, G., In primum Artis parvae Galeni librum commentaria. Basel, 1536.
Mansion, S., Études aristotéliciennes. Louvain-la-Neuve, 1984.
—, “‘Plus connu en soi’, ‘plus connu pour nous’. Une distinction épisté-
mologique importante chez Aristote.” Pensiamento, 35 (1979), 161–170.
Repr. Mansion, Études aristotéliciennes, pp. 213–222.
Manuli, P. & M. Vegetti (eds.), Le opere psicologiche di Galeno. Napoli, 1988.
Marchand, S. & Lunbeck, E. (eds.), Proof and Persuasion. Essays on Authority,
Objectivity, and Evidence. Turnhout, 1996.
Marenbon, J., Later Medieval Philosophy (1150–1350). An Introduction. Lon-
don & New York, 1987.
Marenbon, J. (ed.), Aristotle in Britain during the Middle Ages. Turnhout,
1996.
Marsilius of Inghen (?), Questiones subtilissime Johannis Marcilii Inguen super
octo libros Physicorum secundum nominalium viam. Lyon, 1518. Repr. Frank-
furt, 1964.
Martinich, A. P., A Hobbes Dictionary. Oxford, 1995.
Mayer, H. C., Nikolaus Taurellus, der erst Philosoph im Luthertum. Ein Beitrag
zum Problem Vernunft und Offenbarung. Theological dissertation, University
of Göttingen, 1959.
Mayr, E., Animal Species and Evolution. Cambridge, Mass., 1963.
—, “The Ontological Status of Species: Scientific Progress and Philosophical
Terminology.” Biology and Philosophy, 2 (1987), 145–166.
Melsen, A. G. van, From Atomos to Atom. The History of the Concept Atom. Trans.
H. J. Koren. Pittsburgh, 1952.
Menn, S., “The Greatest Stumbling Block: Descartes’ Denial of Real Quali-
ties.” In Ariew, Descartes and his Contemporaries, pp. 182–207.
—, “The Intellectual Setting.” In Garber e.a. (eds.), Cambridge History of
Seventeenth-Century Philosophy, pp. 33–86.
Mercer, Ch., Leibniz’s Metaphysics. Its Origins and Development. Cambridge,
2001.
—, “The Vitality and Importance of Early Modern Aristotelianism.” In Sorell
(ed.), The Rise of Modern Philosophy, pp. 33–67.
Mersenne, M., L’impieté des deistes, athées et libertins de ce temps. 2 vols., Paris
1624.
22 bibliography
—, La verité des sciences contre les Scepitques ou Pyrrhoniens. Paris, 1625.

—, L’impieté des deistes, athées et libertins de ce temps. 2 vols., Paris 1624.
—, La verité des sciences contre les Scepitques ou Pyrrhoniens. Paris, 1625.
Merton, R. K., Science, Technology, and Society in 17th Century England. New
York, 1938.
Métraux, G. & F. Crouzet (eds.), The Evolution of Science. New York, 1963.
Michael, E., “Daniel Sennert on Matter and Form: At the Juncture of the
Old and the New.” In Lüthy e.a. (eds.), The Fate of Hylomorphism, pp. 272–
299.
Micheli, G., Le origini del concetto di macchina. Firenze,1995.
Miele, M., “Indagini sulla comunità conventuale di Giordano Bruno (1556–
1576).” Bruniana & Campanelliana, 1 (1995), 157–203.
—, “L’organizzazione degli studi dei Domeniani di Napoli al tempo di Gior-
dano Bruno.” In Canone (ed.), Giordano Bruno, pp. 29–50.
Mikkeli, H., An Aristotelian Response to Renaissance Humanism. Jacopo Zabarella
on the Nature of the Arts and Sciences. Helsinki, 1992.
—, “The Foundation of an Autonomous Natural Philosophy. Zabarella on
the Classificiation of Arts and Sciences.” In Di Liscia e.a. (eds.), Method
and Order, pp. 211–228.
Minnis, A. J., Medieval Theory of Authorship. Scholastic Literary Attitudes in the
Later Middle Ages. London, 1984.
Montanus, J. B., In Artem Parvam Galeni explanationes. Ed. V. Lublin. Ly-
on,1556.
Moody, E. & M. Clagett, The Medieval Science of Weights. Madison, Wisc.,
1952.
Morrison, D., “Philoponus and Simplicius on Tekmeriodic Proof.” In Di
Liscia e.a. (eds.), Method and Order, pp. 1–22.
Mucillo, M., Platonismo, Ermetismo e “Prisca Theologia.” Firenze, 1996.
—, “Su Ramo, Patrizi, Bruno.” Nouvelles de la République des Lettres, 13 (1994),
201–203.
Mueller, I., “Aristotle’s Doctrine of Abstraction in the Commentators.” In
Sorabji (ed.), Aristotle Transformed, pp. 463–480.
Mugnai Carrara, D., La biblioteca di Nicolò Leoniceno. Firenze, 1991.
Muller, R. A., “Vera Philosophia cum Theologia nusquam Pugnat. Keckermann
on Philosophy, Theology, and the Problem of Double Truth.” The Sixteenth
Century Journal 15 (1984), 341–365.
Muller, R. A., “Vera Philosophia cum Theologia nusquam Pugnat. Kecker-
mann on Philosophy, Theology, and the Problem of Double Truth.” The
Sixteenth Century Journal 15 (1984), 341–365.
Murdoch, J. E., “The Analytic Character of Late Medieval Learning. Nat-
ural Philosophy without Nature.” In Roberts (ed.), Approaches to Nature,
pp. 171–213.
—, “Infinity and Continuity.” In Kretzmann e.a. (eds.), The Cambridge History
of Later Medieval Philosophy, pp. 564–591.
Murdoch, J. E. & E. D. Sylla (eds.), The Cultural Context of Medieval Learn-
ing. Dordrecht, 1975.
—, Studies in Renaissance Philosophy and Science. London, 1981.
bibliography 23
Nardi, B., “Il commento di Simplicio a De anima nelle controversie della fine
del secolo xv e del secolo xvi.” In Nardi, Saggi sull’aristotelismo padovano,
pp. 365–443.
—, Saggi sull’aristotelismo padovano dal secolo xiv al xvi. Firenze, 1958.
Newton, I., Mathematical Principles of Natural Philosophy. Trans. A. Mohe, rev.
trans. F. Cajori. Berkeley, 1947.
Nicole Oresme, Nicole Oresme and the Medieval Geometry of Qualities and Mo-
tions. A Treatise on the Uniformity and Difformity of Intensities known as “Trac-
tatus de configurationibus qualitatum et motuum”. Ed. and trans. M. Clagett.
Madison, Wisc., 1968.
—, Quaestiones super De generatione et corruptione. Ed. S. Caroti. München,
1996.
—, The “Questiones super De celo” of Nicole Oresme. Ed. and trans. C. Kren. Ph.D.
diss. University of Wisconsin, 1965.
—, Questiones super libros Physicorum Aristotelis. In S. Kirschner, Nicolaus Oresmes
Kommentar zur Physik des Aristoteles. Stuttgart, 1997.
Nifo, A., Expositio subtilissima necnon et collectanea commentariaque in tres libros
Aristotelis De anima. Venezia 1559.
Nussbaum, M. C., “Saving Aristotle’s Appearances.” In Schofield e.a. (eds.),
Language and Logos, pp. 267–293.
Nussbaum, M. C. &, A. Oksenberg Rorty (eds.), Essays on Aristotle’s “De
anima.” Oxford, 1992.
Nutton, V., “The Changing Language of Medicine, 1450–1550.” In Weijers
(ed.), Vocabulary of Teaching, pp. 184–198.
—, “The Rise of Medical Humanism: Ferrara, 1464–1555.” Renaissance Stud-
ies, 11 (1997), 2–19.
Nutton, V. (ed.), Galen. Problems and Prospects. London, 1981.
Okruhlik, D. & J. R. Brown (eds.), The Natural Philosophy of Leibniz. Dor-
drecht, 1985.
Olivieri, L., Certezza e gerarchia del sapere. Padova, 1983
—, “La scientificità della teoria dell’anima nell’insegnamento padovano di
Pietro Pomponazzi.” In Olivieri, “La scientificità”, pp. 203–222.
Olivieri, L. (ed.), Aristotelismo veneto e scienza moderna. Vol. 1. Padova, 1983.
Ophuijsen, J. M. van & M. Van Raalte (eds.), Theophrastus. Reappraising
the Sources. New Brunswick & London, 1998.
Osler, J. M. (ed.), Rethinking the Scientific Revolution. Cambridge, 2000.
Ottosson, P.-G., Scholastic Medicine and Philosophy. A Study of Commentaries
on Galen’s “Tegni” (ca. 1300–1450). Napoli, 1984.
Owen, G. E. L., “Commentary.” In Crombie (ed.), Scientific Change, pp. 93–
102.
Owens, J., “The Universality of the Sensible in the Aristotelian Noetic.” In
Anton e.a. (eds.), Essays in Ancient Greek Philosophy, pp. 462–477.
Park, K., “The Readers at the Florentine Studio according to Comunal Fiscal
Records (1357–1380, 1413–1446).” Rinascimento, 20 (1980), 249–312.
Paschetto, E., Pietro d’Abano. Medico e filosofo. Firenze, 1984.
Pazzini, A., Atti del convegno internazionale per la celebrazione del v centenario
della nascita di Giovanni Manardo (1462–1536). Ferrara, 1963.
24 bibliography
Pepe, L. (ed.), Copernico e la questione copernicana in Italia dal xvi al xix secolo.
Firenze, 1996.
Pereira, B., De communibus omnium rerum naturalium principiis et affectionibus.
Roma, 1576.
Peter Auriol, Commentarii in iv libros Sententiarum. 5 parts in 2 vols. Roma,
1596 and 1604.
Petersen, P., Geschichte der aristotelischen Philosophie im protestantischen Deutsch-
land. Leipzig, 1921. Repr. Stuttgart, 1964.
Piccolomini, F., Librorum ad scientiam de natura attinentium. Partes v.
Venezia, 1600.
Plato, Republic. Ed. and trans. R. A. H. Waterfield. Oxford, 1993.
Poppi, A., “La filosofia naturale del primo Cinquecento nelle università di
Padova, Bologna e Ferrara.” In Pepe (ed.), Copernico, pp. 39–67.
Poppi, A. (ed.), Scienza a filosofia all’università di Padova nel Quattrocento.
Padova, 1983.
Porphyry, Isagoge et in Aristotelis Categorias commentarium. Ed. A. Busse.
Berlin, 1887. (Commentarium in Aristotelis graeca 4/1)
Porro, P., Forme e modelli di durata nel pensiero medievale. L’aevum, il tempo
discreto, la categoria “quando.” Leuven, 1996.
Porro, P. (ed.), The Medieval Concept of Time. The Scholastic Debate and its
Reception in Early Modern Philosophy. Leiden, 2001.
—, The Medieval Concept of Time. The Scholastic Debate and its Reception in Early
Modern Philosophy. Leiden, 2001.
Porter, R., “The Scientific Revolution and Universities.” In Rüegg e.a.
(eds.), A History of the University, pp. 530–562.
Possevinus, A., Bibliotheca selecta de ratione studiorum. Roma, 1593.
Premuda, L., “Un discepolo di Leoniceno tra filologia ed empirismo: G. Ma-
nardo ed il ‘Libero esame’ dei classici della medicina in funzione di più
spregiudicati orientamenti metodologici.” In Pazzini (ed.), Atti del conveg-
no internazionale, pp. 43–56.
Priscianus Lydus, Metaphrasis in Theophrastum. Ed. I. Bywater. Berlin, 1886
—, On Theophrastus on Sense-Perception. Trans. P. Huby. Simplicius on Aristotle
on the Soul 2.5–12. Trans. C. Steel. In collaboration with J. O. Urmson.
Notes by P. Lautner. London, 1997.
Proclus, The Elements of Theology. Revised text with translation, introduction
and commentary by E. R. Dodds. 2nd ed. Oxford, 1963.
—, In Platonis Parmenidem commentaria. Ed. V. Cousin. Paris, 1864.
—, In Platonis Timaeum commentaria. Ed. E. Diehl. 3 vols. Leipzig, 1903–1906.
—, In primum Euclidis Elementorum commentarii. Ed. G. Friedlein. Leipzig,
1873.
Pumfrey, S., P. L. Rossi & M. Slawinski (eds.), Science, Culture and Popular
Belief in Renaissance Europe. Manchester & New York, 1991.
Quelques aspects de l’évolution des idées scientifiques. Antiquité et moyen âge. Rabat,
2000.
Raitt, J., The Eucharistic Theology of Theodore Beza. Development of the Reformed
Doctrine. Chambersbury, pa, 1972.
Rashed, R. (ed.), Encyclopaedia of the History of Arabic Science. London & New
bibliography 25
York, 1996.
Redmond, W. B., Bibliography of the Philosophy in the Iberian Colonies of America.
Den Haag, 1972.
Redondi, P., Galileo eretico. Torino, 1983.
Ridley, M. (ed.), Evolution. Oxford, 1997.
Ali ibn Ridwān, In Artem Parvam Galeni commentarii. In Torrigiano: Plus
quam commentum in parvam Galeni artem. Venezia, 1557.
Roberts, L. D. (ed.), Approaches to Nature in the Middle Ages. Binghamton &
New York, 1982.
Robinet, A., Architectonique disjonctive, automates systémiques et idéalité transcen-
dantale dans l’oeuvre de G. W. Leibniz. Paris, 1986.
Roccaro, G. (ed.), Platonismo e aristotelismo nel Mezzogiorno d’Italia. Palermo,
1989.
Roger Bacon, The Opus majus of Roger Bacon. Trans. R. B. Burke. 2 vols. New
York, 1962.
—, Opus maius. Ed. J. Bridges. 3 vols. London, 1900.
Roncaglia, G., Palaestra rationis. Discussioni su natura della copula e modalità
nella filosofia “scolastica” tedesca del xvii secolo. Firenze, 1996
Rose, P. L. & S. Drake, “The Pseudo-Aristotelian Questions of Mechanics in
Renaissance Culture.” Studies in the Renaissance, 18 (1971), 65–104.
Rossi, P., “Aristotelici e ‘moderni’: le ipotesi e la natura.” In Olivieri (ed.),
Aristotelismo veneto, pp. 125–154.
Rozhanskaya, M. M., “Al-Khazini, Kniga vesov midrosti [The Book of
the Balance of Wisdom].” In Iz istorii fiziko-matematiceskich nauk na sred-
nevekovom Vostoke: traktaty al-Chazini, al-Biruni, Ibn al-Chusajna, as-Sirazi
(Naucnoye nasledstvo [Scientific Heritage]), 6 (1983), 15–140, 276–308.
—, “Statics.” In Rashed (ed.), Encyclopaedia of the History of Arabic Science,
vol. 3, pp. 614–642.
Rüegg, W. & H. De Ridder-Symoens (eds.), A History of the University in
Europe. Vol. ii. Universities in Early Modern Europe (1500–1800). Cambridge,
1996.
Russo, F., “Catholicism, Protestantism, and the Development of Science
in the 16th and 17th Centuries.” In Métraux e.a.(eds.), The Evolution of
Science, pp. 291–320.
Sabra, A. I., “The Appropriation and Subsequent Naturalization of Greek
Science in Medieval Islam: A Preliminary Statement.” History of Science, 27
(1987), 223–243.
Sacrosancti Concilii Tridentini Canones et decreta. Item declarationes cardinalium
Concilii interpretum; ex ultima recognitione Ioan. Gallemart. Köln, 1621.
Sambursky, S., “Conceptual Developments and Modes of Explanation in
Later Greek Scientific Thought.” In Crombie (ed.), Scientific Change,
pp. 61–78.
Sambursky, S, The Physical World of Late Antiquity. London, 1962.
Santillana, G. de, The Crime of Galileo. Chicago, 1955.
Santorio, S., Commentaria in artem medicinalem Galeni. Venezia, 1630.
Scaliger, J. C., Exotericae exercitationes de subtilitate ad Hieronymum Cardanum.
Paris, 1557. 2nd ed. Frankfurt, 1576.
26 bibliography
Schegkius, J., Admonitio Jacobi Schegkii de commentariis suis in topica Aristotelis,

et eiusdem pia confessione ac fide, de coena Domini, et persona Christi; Cum
praefatione rectoris, et quatuor Decanorum Academiae Tubingensis. Tübingen,
1585.
Schmid, X., Nikolaus Taurellus, der erste deutsche Philosoph. Erlangen 1860.
Schmitt, C. B., The Aristotelian Tradition and Renaissance Universities. London,
1984.
—, “Aristotle among the Physicians.” In Wear e.a. (eds.), The Medical Renais-
sance, pp. 1–15.
—, “Philoponus’ Commentary on Aristotle’s Physics in the 16th Century.” In
Sorabji (ed.), Philoponus, pp. 210–230.
—, “Philosophy and Science in Sixteenth-Century Universities: Some Prelim-
inary Comments.” In Murdoch e.a. (eds.), The Cultural Context, pp. 485–
530.
—, “Science in the Italian Universities in the Sixteenth and Early Seven-
teenth Centuries.” In Crosland (ed.), The Emergence of Science, pp. 35–56.
Schmitt, C. B. & Q. Skinner (eds.), The Cambridge History of Renaissance
Philosophy. Cambridge, 1988.
Schneider, N., Die Kosmologie des Franciscus de Marchia. Texte, Quellen und
Untersuchungen zur Naturphilosophie des 14. Jahrhunderts. Leiden, 1991
Schobinger, J.-P. (ed.), Grundriss der Geschichte der Philosophie, begründet von
Friedrich Ueberweg. Die Philosophie des 17. Jahrhunderts. 8 vols. Band 1: Allge-
meine Themen. Iberische Halbinsel/Italien. Basel, 1998.
Schofield, M. & M. C. Nussbaum (eds.), Language and Logos. Studies in
Ancient Greek Philosophy Presented to G. E. L. Owen. Cambridge, 1982.
Schofield, M., M. Burnyeat & J. Barnes (eds.), Doubt and Dogmatism.
Oxford, 1980.
Schuhmann, K., “Hobbes dans les Publications de Mersenne en 1644.”
Bulletin Hobbes 7 in Archives de Philosophie 58 (1995), 2–7.
—, “Hobbes dans les Publications de Mersenne en 1644,” Bulletin Hobbes
7 in Archives de Philosophie 58 (1995): 2–7.
Sedley, D., “Epicurean Antireductionism.” In Barnes e.a. (eds.), Matter and
Metaphysics, pp.?.
Sharples, R. W., “Alexander of Aphrodisias. Scholasticism and Innovation.”
In Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt. Part ii. Vol. 36. Ed. W. Haase.
Berlin & New York, 1987, pp. 1176–1243.
—, Theophrastus of Eresus. Vol. 3: Sources on Physics. Part i: Texts 137–223.
Leiden & Boston, 1998.
Shea, W. R., “Galileo and the Church.” In Lindberg e.a. (eds.), God &
Nature, pp. 114–135.
Shirley, J. W. & F. D. Hoeniger (eds.), Science and the Arts in the Renaissance.
Washington D.C. & London, 1985.
Shriver, F., “Orthodoxy and Diplomacy. James i and the Vorstius Affair.”
The English Historical Review, 85 (1970), 449–474.
Simoni, S., In librum Aristotelis de sensuum instrumentis et de his quae sub sensum
cadunt commentarius unus. Genève, 1566.
Simplicius, In Aristotelis Categorias commentarium. Ed. K. Kalbfleisch. Berlin,
bibliography 27
1907. (Commentaria in Aristotelem graeca, 8)

—, In Aristotelis Physicorum libros quattuor priores commentaria. Ed. H. Diels.
Ps.-Simplicius, In libros Aristotelis De anima commentaria. Ed. M. Hayduck.
Siraisi, N. G., Avicenna in Renaissance Italy. The Canon and Medical Teaching
in Italian Universities after 1500. Princeton, 1987.
—, Taddeo Alderotti and his Pupils. Two Generations of Italian Medical Learning.
Princeton, 1981.
Skinner, Q., “Moral Ambiguity and the Art of Persuasion in the Renais-
sance.” In Marchand e.a. (eds.), Proof and Persuasion, pp. 25–41.
—, Reason and Rhetoric in the Philosophy of Hobbes. Cambridge, 1996.
Sorabji, R. R. K., “Aristotle, Mathematics and Colour.” The Classical Quarterly,
22 (1972), 293–308.
—, Matter, Space and Motion. Theories in Antiquity and their Sequel. London,
1988.
—, “Simplicius: Prime Matter as Extension.” In Hadot (ed.), Simplicius,
pp. 148–165.
—, Time, Creation and the Continuum. Theories in Antiquity and the Early Middle
Ages. London, 1983.
Sorabji, R. R. K. (ed.), Aristotle Transformed: The Ancient Commentators and
Their Influence. Ithaca, 1990.
—, Philoponus and the Rejection of Aristotelian Science. London, 1987.
Sorell, T. (ed.), The Rise of Modern Philosophy. The Tension between the New
and Traditional Philosophies from Machiavelli to Leibniz. Oxford, 1993.
Southgate, B., “Covetous of Truth.” The Life and Works of Thomas White. 1593–
1676. Dordrecht, 1993.
Spagnesi, E., Utiliter edoceri : atti inediti degli ufficiali dello Studio fiorentino
(1391–1396). Milano, 1979.
Spampanato, V. & G. Gentile (eds.), Documenti della vita di Giordano Bruno.
Firenze, 1933.
Sparn, W., Die Wiederkehr der Metaphysik. Stuttgart, 1976.
Spruit, L., “Bruno’s Use of Experience in Context.” In Canone (ed.), Letture
bruniane iii, (forthcoming).
—, Il problema della conoscenza in Giordano Bruno. Napoli, 1988.
—, Species intelligibilis. Vol. i: From Perception to Knowledge. Leiden, 1994. Vol.
ii: Renaissance Controversies, Later Scholasticism, and the Elimination of the
Intelligible Species in Modern Philosophy. Leiden, 1995.
Steel, C., “Breathing Thought: Proclus on the Innate Knowledge of the
Soul.” In Cleary (ed.), The Perennial Tradition of Neoplatonism, pp. 293–
309.
—, “Introduction.” In Priscianus Lydus, On Theophrastus on Sense-Perception
[Huby], pp. 103–141.
Steinschneider, M., Die arabischen Übersetzungen aus dem Griechischen. Graz,
1960.
Sturlese, R., “Averroe quantumque arabo e ignorante di lingua greca.... Note
sull’averroismo di Giordano Bruno.” Giornale critico della filosofia italiana,
28 bibliography
71 (1992), 248–275.
Sturm, J. Ch., Philosophia eclectica. Altdorf, 1686.
Suarez-Nani, T., Tempo ed essere nell’autunno del medioevo. Il De tempore di Nicola
di Strasburgo e il dibattito sulla natura ed il senso del tempo agli inizi del xiv
secolo. Amsterdam, 1989.
Sylla, E. D., “Autonomous and Handmaiden Science. St. Thomas Aquinas
and William of Ockham on the Physics of the Eucharist.” In Kretzman
(ed.), Infinity and Continuity, pp. 207–230.
—, “Godfrey of Fontaines on Motion with Respect to Quantity of the Eu-
charist.” In Maierù e.a. (eds.), Studi sul xiv secolo, pp. 105–141.
—, “The A Posteriori Foundations of Natural Science.” Synthese, 40 (1979),
147–187.
—, “The A Posteriori Foundations of Natural Science; Some Medieval Com-
mentaries on Aristotle’s Physics, Book i, chapters 1 and 2.” Synthese, 40
(1979), 147–187.
—, “Godfrey of Fontaines on Motion with respect to Quantity of the Eu-
charist.” In Maierù e.a. (eds.), Studi sul xiv secolo, pp. 105–141.
—, “Ideo quasi mendicare oportet intellectum humanum: The Role of Theology
in John Buridan’s Natural Philosophy.” (forthcoming)
—, “Imaginary Space: John Dumbleton and Isaac Newton.” In Aertsen e.a.
(eds.), Raum und Raumvorstellungen, pp?.
—, “Medieval Concepts of the Latitude of Forms: The Oxford Calculators.”
Archives d’ histoire doctrinale et littéraire du Moyen Age, 48 (1974), 223–283.
—, “The Transmission of the New Physics of the Fourteenth Century from
England to the Continent.” In Carsti e.a. (eds.) La nouvelle physique du
xiv e siècle, pp. 65–110.
Syrianus, In Metaphysica commentaria. Ed. G. Kroll. Berlin, 1902. (Commen-
taria in Aristotelem graeca, 6/1)
Tachau, K., Vision and Certitude in the Age of Okham. Optics, Epistemology and
the Foundations of Semantics, 1250–1345. Leiden, 1988.
Tannery, P., “Sur un point de la méthode d’Aristote.” Archiv für Geschichte
der Philosophie, 6 (1893), 468–474.
Taurellus, N., Medicae predicationis methodus. Frankfurt, 1581
—, Emblemata physico-ethica. Nürnberg, 1602.
—, Kosmologia, hoc est.De mundo libri ii. Amberg, 1603.
—, De mutationibus rerum naturalium physicae. Disputation defended by Jo-
hannes Ingolsttetter. Altdorf, 1595.
—, Philosophiae triumphus, hoc est, metaphysica philosophandi methodus. Basel,
1573.
—, De rerum aeternitate, metaphysices universalis partes iv. Marburg, 1604.
—, Synopsis Aristotelis metaphysices ad normam Christianae religionis emendatae et
completae. Hanau, 1596.
—, De usiis per se subsistentibus, tractatus metaphysicus affectus, non confectus,
appended to De mundo et coelo libri iv. Ed. nova. Amberg,1611.
Taurellus, N. (ed.), Arnaldi de Villanova philosophi et medici summi Opera
omnia. Basel, 1585.
Themistius, Analyticorum Posteriorum paraphrasis. Ed. M. Wallies. Berlin,
bibliography 29
1900. (Commentaria in Aristotelem graeca, 5/1)

—, In Aristotelis Physica paraphrasis. Ed. H. Schenkl. Berlin, 1900. (Commen-
—, In Aristotelis De anima paraphrasis. Ed. R. Heinze. Berlin, 1899. (Commen-
Thijssen, J. M. M. H., “The Commentary on the Physics of Bartholomew of
Bruges.” Manuscripta, 31 (1987), 89–101.
—, “Late-Medieval Natural Philosophy. Some Recent Trends in Scholarship.”
Recherches de Théologie et Philosophie médiévales, 67 (2000), 158–190.
—, “Some Reflections on Continuity and Transformation of Aristotelianism
in Medieval (and Renaissance) Natural Philosophy.” Documenti e studi sulla
tradizione filosofica medievale, 2 (1991), 503–528.
Thijssen, J. M. M. H. & H. A. G. Braakhuis (eds.), The Commentary Tra-
dition on “De generatione et corruptione.” Ancient Medieval and Early Modern.
Turnhout 1999.
Thomas Aquinas, In librum Boetii De trinitate expositio. Ed. B. Decker. Leiden,
1959.
—, In librum De causis expositio. Ed. C. Pera. Torino, 1955.
—, In octo libros Physicorum Aristotelis expositio. Ed. P. M. Maggiolo. Torino &
Roma, 1965.
—, Opera omnia. Ed. R. Busa. Stuttgart, 1980.
—, Opera Omnia, iussu impensaque Leonis xiii. Roma, 1865–.
—, Summa contra gentiles. Ed. C. Pera. 3 vols. Torino, 1961.
—, De veritate. Roma, 1972–1976. (Opera omnia, [Leonina], 22/1–3)
Thomasius, J., Physica, perpetuo dialogo, suis tamen capitibus interciso, sic ador-
nata, ut scientia naturalis non tantum definiendo ac dividendo, sed etiam celebri-
oribus attingendis controversiis, idque plana methodo nec difficili, explicetur. 2nd
ed. Leipzig, 1705.
Tocco, F., “Le fonti più recenti della filosofia di Giordano Bruno,” Rendiconti
della Reale Accademia dei Lincei (Classe di scienze morali, storiche e filologiche).
Ser. 5a, 1 (1892), 503–538.
Todd, R. B., “Epitêdeiotês in Philosophical Literature: Towards an Analysis.”
Acta Classica, 15 (1972), 25–35.
—, “Galenic Medical Ideas in the Greek Aristotelian Commentators.” Sym-
bolae Osloenses, 52 (1976), 117–134.
—, “Philosophy and Medicine in John Philoponus’ Commentary on Aristotle’s
‘De anima’.” Dumbarton Oaks Papers, 38 (1984), 103–110.
—, “Some Concepts in Physical Theory in John Philoponus.” Archiv für
Begriffsgeschichte, 24 (1980), 151–170.
Toellner, R., “Renata dissectionis ars. Vesals Stellung zu Galen in ihren wis-
senschaftlichen Voraussetzungen und Folgen.” In Buck (ed.), Die Rezeption
der Antike, pp. 85–95.
Torrigiano, P., Plus quam commentum in Parvam Galeni Artem. Venezia, 1557.
Toulmin, S., Human Understanding. The Collective Use and Evolution of Concepts.
Princeton, 1972.
Trifogli, C., “Thomas Wylton on Motion.” Archiv für Geschichte der Philoso-
phie, 77 (1995), 135–154.
30 bibliography
—, “Continuità e discontinuità delle grandezze fisiche in Egidio Romano.”

Nuncius, Annali di Storia della Scienza, 5 (1990), 53–73.
—, “La dottrina del tempo in Egidio Romano.” Documenti e studi sulla
tradizione filosofica medievale, 1 (1990), 247–276.
—, “Egidio Romano e la dottrina aristotelica dell’infinito.” Documenti e studi
sulla tradizione filosofica medievale, 2 (1991), 217–238.
—, Oxford Physics in the Thirteenth Century (ca. 1250–1270). Motion, Infinity,
Place and Time. Leiden & Boston, 2000.
—, “Il problema dello statuto ontologico del tempo nelle ‘Questiones super
Physicam’ di Thomas Wylton e di Giovanni di Jandun.” Documenti e studi
sulla tradizione filosofica medievale, 1 (1990), 491–548.
—, “Le questioni sul libro iii della Fisica in alcuni commenti inglesi intorno
alla metà del sec. xiii.” Documenti e studi sulla tradizione filosofica medievale,
2 (1991), 443–501.
—, “Le questioni sul libro iii della Fisica in alcuni commenti inglesi intorno
4 (1993), 135–178.
—, “Le questioni sul libro iv della Fisica in alcuni commenti inglesi intorno
7 (1996), 39–114.
—, “Le questioni sul libro iv della Fisica in alcuni commenti inglesi intorno
9 (1998), 179–259.
—, “Thomas Wylton on the Immobility of Place.” Recherches de théologie et de
philosophie médiévales, 65 (1998), 1–39.
Tsouyopoulos, N., “Die Entstehung physikalischer Terminologie aus der
neoplatonischen Metaphysik.” Archiv für Begriffsgeschichte, 13 (1969), 7–
33.
Turnbull, R. G., “Physics i: Sense Universals and First Principles.” In Turn-
bull e.a. (eds.), Motion and Time, pp. 28–55.
Turnbull, R. G. & P. Machamer (eds.), Motion and Time, Space and Matter.
Interrelations in the History of Philosophy and Science. Columbus, Ohio, 1974.
Tweedale, M. M., “Alexander of Aphrodisias’ Views on Universals.” Phrone-
sis, 29 (1984), 279–303.
Vailati, E., Leibniz and Clarke. A Study of Their Correspondence. New York,
1997.
Vasoli, C., “Le discipline e il sistema del sapere.” In Cristiani (ed.), Sapere
e/è potere, pp. 11–36.
—, “Bruno, Ramo e Patrizi.” Nouvelles de la République des Lettres, 13 (1994),
169–190.
Verbeek, Th., “‘Ens per accidens’: Le origini della Querelle di Utrecht.”
Giornale critico della filosofia italiana. 6th series, vol. 13, 71 (1992), 276–
288.
Verbeek, Th. (ed.), René Descartes et Martin Schook. La Querelle d’Utrecht. Paris,
1988.
Verde, A. F., Lo Studio Fiorentino, 1473–1503. Ricerche e documenti, 5 vols.
Firenze 1973–1994.
bibliography 31
Vernia, N., “Quaestio est, an medicina nobilior atque praestantior sit iure
civili (1482).” In Garin (ed.), La disputa.
Vickers, B. (ed.), Occult and Scientific Mentalities in the Renaissance. Cam-
bridge, 1984.
Vietor, Z., Topica. Giessen 1608.
Voetius, G., Selectarum disputationum theologicarum pars i. Utrecht, 1648.
Vorstius, C., Anti-Bellarminus contractus, hoc est, Compendiosum examen omni-
um fidei controversiam, quae hoc tempore inter Evangelicos & Pontificios agitntur,
prout eas Robertus Bellarminus Cardinalis iv. Disputationum suarum tomis com-
plexus est. Hanau, 1610.
—, Apologia pro Ecclesiis orthodoxis. 2nd ed. Hanau, 1607.
—, Christiana et modesta responsio, ad articulos quosdam, nuper ex Anglia trans-
missos, et typis hi descriptos, passimque in vulgus late dispersos. Leiden, 1611.
—, Enchiridion controversiarum: seu Index errorum Ecclesiae Romanae, una cum
antidoto. Ex iv tomis disputationum Roberti Bellarmini, in gratiam studiosae
juventutis excerptus. Steinfurt, 1604; 2nd ed., Hanau, 1608.
—, Tessaradecas anti-Pistoriana, hoc est Responsio ad librum D. Johannis Pistorii
Nidani. 2 vols, Hanau, 1607.
—, Tractatus theologicus de Deo, sive de natura & attributis Dei, omnia fere ad
hanc materiam pertinentia ... decem disputationibus, antehac in Illustri Schola
Steinfurtensi, diverso tempore, publice habitis. Steinfurt, 1610.
Wallace, W. A., Causality and Scientific Explanation. 2 vols. Ann Arbor, Mich.,
1972–1974.
—, Galileo and His Sources: The Heritage of the Collegio Romano in Galileo’s Science.
Princeton, 1984.
Wallace, W., Galileo’s Logic of Discovery and Proof. Dordrecht, 1992.
Walter Burley, In Physicam Aristotelis expositio et quaestiones. Venezia, 1501.
Watson, R. A., “Transubstantiation among the Cartesians.” In Lennon e.a.
(eds.), Problems of Cartesianism, pp. 127–148.
Wear, A., “Galen in the Renaissance.” In Nutton (ed.), Galen. Problems and
Prospects, pp. 229–267.
Wear, A., R. K. French & I. M. Lonie (eds.), The Medical Renaissance of the
Sixteenth Century. Cambridge, 1985.
Webster, C. (ed.), Health, Medicine and Mortality in the Sixteenth Century.
Cambridge, 1979.
Webster, Ch., The Great Instauration. Science, Medicine and Reform 1626–
1660. London, 1975.
Weijers, O. (ed.), Vocabulary of Teaching and Research between Middle Ages and
Renaissance. Turnhout, 1995.
Weisheipl, J. A., “The Concept of Matter in Fourteenth Century Science.”
In Weisheipl, “The Concept of Matter”, pp. 1 47–169.
Wenin, C. (ed.), L’homme et son univers au Moyen Age. Louvain-la-Neuve, 1986.
(Age?)
Wenz, G., Einführung in die evangelische Sakramentenlehre. Darmstadt, 1988.
Westman, R., “The Copernicans and the Churches.” In Lindberg e.a. (eds.),
God & Nature, pp. 76–113.
White, M., The Continuous and the Discrete. Oxford, 1992.
32 bibliography
White, Th., Controversy Logicke or, the Method to Come to Truth in Debates of
Religion. Paris, 1659. 2nd. ed. Roan, 1674.
—, De mundo dialogi tres. Paris, 1642.
Wiedemann, E., “Al-Karas. t.ūn.” In Houtsma (ed.), First Encyclopaedia of Islam,
vol. 4, pp. 757–760.
—, Aufsätze zur arabischen Wissenschaftsgeschichte. 2 vols. Hildesheim/New
York, 1970.
—, “Die Schrift über den Qarastun.” Biblioteca Mathematica, 12 (1911–1912),
21–39.
Wieland, W., Die aristotelische Physik. Untersuchungen über die Grundlegung der
Naturwissenschaft und die sprachlichen Bedingungen der Prinzipienfindung bei
Aristoteles. Göttingen, 1962.
William Ockham, Expositio in libros Physicorum. Ed. V. Richter & G. Leibold.
St. Bonaventure, 1985.
Woepcke, F., “Notice sur des traductions arabes de deux ouvrages perdus
d’Euclide.” Journal asiatique, 4ème série, 18 (1851), 217–247.
Wolfson, H. A., Crescas’ Critique of Aristotle. Problems of Aristotle’s Physics in
Jewish and Arabic Philosophy. Cambridge, Mass., 1929.
Wood, R., “Walter Burley’s Physics Commentaries.” Franciscan Studies, 44
(1984), 275–303.
Zabarella, J., Commentarii in iii Aristotelis libros De anima. Frankfurt 1606
—, De rebus naturalibus libri xxx. Frankfurt, 1607. Repr. Frankfurt, 1966.
—, De rebus naturalibus libri xxx. Köln, 1590.
—, Opera logica. Köln, 1597. Repr. Hildesheim, 1966.
—, Commentarii in Aristotelis libros De anima. Frankfurt, 1606.
Zedler, J. H., Grosses vollständiges Universal-Lexicon aller Wissenschaften und
Künste. 68 vols. Leipzig & Halle, 1732–1754. Repr. Graz, 1961–1964.
Zimara, M., Tabula in dictis Aristotelis et Averrois. Venezia, 1543.
—, Theorematum seu memorabilium propositionum Aristotelis et Averrois. Venezia,
1546.
Zimmermann, A., Verzeichnis ungedruckter Kommentare zur Metaphysik und
Physik des Aristoteles aus der Zeit von etwa 1250–1350. Leiden & Köln, 1971
Zuylen, W. H. van, Bartholomäus Keckermann, sein Leben und Wirken. Bor-
na/Leipzig, 1934.

Arabic Mechniques

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Arabic Mechniques

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Typographica Academica Traiectina. MEMS 5. Proef 1, 19-3-2002:845, page 1.

Anonymus, Quaestiones super De generatione et corruptione. Cambridge, Peter-

John of Wacfeld, Quaestiones super Physicam, i. Cambridge, Gonville and

d’Abano, P., Conciliator controversiarum, quae inter philosophos et medicos ver-

l’évolution des idées scientifiques, pp. 135–175.

Alfarabi, De intellectu et intellecto. In E. Gilson, “Les sources gréco-arabes de

c. 1400. Contribution à l’étude des rapports entre philosophie et théologie. 2 vols.

—, “The School of Padua: Humanistic Medicine in the Sixteenth Century.”

Crisciani, C., “History, Novelty, and Progress in Scholastic Medicine.”

la scienza nei Theoremata (1523).” In Roccaro, Platonismo e aristotelismo,

Repr. Frankfurt, 1968.

Neoplatonism and the Ancient Commentary Tradition. Leiden, 1997.

Hochstetter, E, “Leibniz-Interpretation.” Revue de métaphysique et de morale,

Jacquart, D., “La question disputée dans les facultés de médecine.” In

Joutsivuo, T., Scholastic Tradition and Humanist Innovation. A Concept of Neu-

Leinkauf, T., Il Neoplatonismo di Francesco Patrizi come presupposto della sua

Luther, M., D. Martin Luthers Werke. Kritische Gesamtausgabe, 69 vols. to

—, “Das Problem der quantitas materiae in der Scholastik.” Gregorianum, 27

—, La verité des sciences contre les Scepitques ou Pyrrhoniens. Paris, 1625.

Schegkius, J., Admonitio Jacobi Schegkii de commentariis suis in topica Aristotelis,

1907. (Commentaria in Aristotelem graeca, 8)

1900. (Commentaria in Aristotelem graeca, 5/1)

—, “Continuità e discontinuità delle grandezze fisiche in Egidio Romano.”

You might also like