Professional Documents
Culture Documents
mination of channel depth must be care- Finally, the possibilities of human re-
fully evaluated. lated errors must be considered. The first
If frequent maintenance dredging is re- step in channel design is the determination
quired due to silt accumulation or littoral of the width ofthe maneuvering lane, which
drift, the dredging depth must be deeper is defined as the portion of the channel
than the planned bottom by the amount within which the ship can safely maneuver
determined by local experience. It may vary without encroaching on the bank clearance,
from 0.5 to 2.0 m, depending on local condi- or without approaching dangerously close
tions. It must be noted that the minimum to a passing ship so that interference be-
depth of dredging is usually determined by tween the ships can occur. In the case of
the effective use of available dredging two-way channels where traffic involves
equipment. An excess depth 0.25-0.3 m be- large vessels, a ship clearance lane must be
low the channel design level is generally provided between the two maneuvering
justified without special calculations. lanes.
An access channel constructed in a hard The width of the maneuvering lane (Bm)
bottom should be thoroughly swept to make (Fig. 2-5) may be determined by Eq. (2- 4):
sure that all obstructions, such as boulders,
rocky pinnacles, and so forth, above the
required depth are removed. Bm = Ls sin {3 + Bmax cos {3 + a (2-4)
For more useful practical information the
reader is referred to PIANC (1989), Herbich
(1992), Eryuzlu et al. (1994) and TERMPOL
(1983).