Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1. INTRODUCTION
1.1. BACKGROUND
Milk is a nutritive drinkable food obtained from various animals and consumed by humans. Most
milk is obtained from dairy cows, in the United States, and in many industrialized countries, raw
cow's milk is processed before it is consumed. Milk is also produced from goats, water buffalo, and
reindeer in various parts of the world. During processing the fat content of the milk is adjusted,
various vitamins are added and potentially harmful bacteria are killed. In addition to being
consumed as a drinkable food, milk is also used to make butter, cream, yogurt, cheese, and a variety
of other products. [1]
The use of milk as a beverage probably began with the domestication of animals. Goats and sheep
were domesticated in the area now known as Iran and Afghanistan in about 9000 B.C and by about
7000 B.C. The first milk processing plant in the United States to install pasteurizing equipment was
the Sheffield Farms Dairy in Bloomfield, New Jersey, which imported German-made pasteurizer in
1891. [2]
The term milk is also used for white colored, non-animal beverages resembling milk in color and
texture (milk substitutes) such as soy milk, rice milk, almond milk, and coconut milk. In addition, a
substance secreted by pigeons to feed their young is called" crop milk" and bears some resemblance
to mammalian milk, although it is not consumed as a milk substitute.[3]
Soybeans are an important source of protein and oil. On average, over one-third of the soybean mass
is protein and about 20% is oil. One of the most common types of soy product for food applications
sold in the Western marketplace is soymilk. Soymilk is the pasteurized extract of soaked ground
soybeans, and soy protein isolates are purified fractions containing greater than 90% protein.
Soy protein isolate is extensively used as a food ingredient in many fabricated foods such as
comminuted meat products. The recent increase in soy protein products consumption is the result of
advances in achieving improved taste and recognition of health benefits. [4]
Currently, a number of researchers are doing their scientific and technological work to diversify and
enhance soya bean products. This paper work is mainly concentrate on process development for
soymilk production using hot and cold extraction method. Then, based on the developed process,
laboratory based soymilk produced and characterized. Lastly, large scale production process
designed and optimized to get a better product yield.
To supplement the high demand of milk soya milk is an ideal solution. There is currently a large and
growing market for soymilk in the Ethiopia, as a dairy alternative, as a nutritious sweetened soft
drink. But there is no production of soymilk in our country. Dairy alternatives are attracting an
increasing interest for a number of powerful reasons, including health concerns, the growth in
vegetarianism, interest in organic foods, regulatory pressures, concerns about genetically modified
foods and animal welfare issues. Soymilk is low in fat, sugar and in gluten. It does not contain any
cholesterol or lactose, but it is high in fiber, contains calcium and is known to promote bone health.
Therefore, it is little wonder that it appeals strongly to a great many people.
1.6. LIMITATION
It is obvious that our University has a big problem on Internet access and unfortunately our
department has no Laboratory instruments and equipments. Nowadays without these two utilities
thinking research work is meaningless. For examples chemical used for characterization of our
product like protein content with the help of Kejeldah method, viscosity, color, carbohydrate,
mineral content, proper heating medium and also other related things were not measured due to un
availability of material in laboratory.
2. LITRATHURE REVIEW
2.1. INTRODUCTION
Soya bean, a member of the family leguminoceae and the genus Glycine Max (L) Merril, has been
receiving attention as a source of food capable of increasing the available protein supplies.
Consequently, interest in the production, processing and utilization of the crop has been growing.
[5]Soybean grows in tropical, subtropical, and temperate climates.
It was domesticated in the 11th century BC around northeast of China. It is believed that it might
have been introduced to Africa in the 19th century by Chinese traders along the eastern coast of
Africa. [6]Soybeans were first grown in Ethiopia in 1950 and a grower’s manual was published in
Amharic. [7]
There are more than 1, 500 varieties of soybean with a growth period that ranges from
75 to 200 days. Different varieties are distinguished according to the size and color of the seeds, the
end use and the length of the growing season. Generally, soybeans can be classified into two major
types, namely the commercial field type and the edible garden type. [8]
The beans are mostly round in shape, like ordinary peas, with considerable size variation within and
between varieties. The color of the seeds may be yellow, green, brown or black and a striped or
spotted combination of all these colors. [8]
Traditional soy foods are classified into two categories: non-fermented and fermented. Typical non-
fermented soybean products are soy milk, tofu, tofu skin, soy meat alternatives, etc., while
fermented products include soy sauce, fermented bean paste, natto, sufu, miso, tempeh, etc. [9]
reactions to dairy. Around 2.5% of children younger than three years old are allergic to milk in the
USA and approximately 80% of these children with milk allergy will not outgrow the allergic
reaction until the age of sixteen. [10]
Soya bean has also been shown to promote serum insulin production. [13] It has been demonstrated
that soya protein helps persons with diabetes prevent kidney diseases and improve the cholesterol
profile. [14] There is evidence that soya foods may help reduce bone loss that typically occurs after
menopause. Soya Iso-flavone can help women with low bone mineral content prevent hip fractures
in postmenopausal years. [15] Soya bean is thus particularly important in postmenopausal years
because it prevents hip fractures, reduces fat development especially abnormal fat and blood
pressure. [16]
Soya foods contain calcium, magnesium and phosphorus, which help to strengthen teeth and prevent
nerve disorder. Soybean consumption on regular basis delays the ageing process.
Soymilk is very economical, lactose free, highly digestible and nutritious alternative of dairy and
meat centered diet. It is cholesterol free product, has a very low fat content and is rich in
polyunsaturated fatty acids of phospholipids. Generally soymilk contains around 7-8% TSS in it.
Adding 3-4% sugar and about 0.05% salt brings it to a sugar, salt and total solid level approximately
identical to toned (2% fat) cow’s milk, i.e. about 12-13% TSS. [18]
undesirable properties which include the presence of trypsin inhibitors and lipoxygenase
enzymes. These disadvantages can be overcome by proper cooking (Blanching) and
dehydration (Soaking) of soybeans because it deactivates the enzyme system responsible for the
odor. [21] Boiling, the application of wet heat loosens soybean seed to ease de-husking and
tenderizes bean cells.
Blanching also enriches soymilk because if soybeans are properly blanched, half of the protein
remains soluble in the liquid extract and will not separate with the residue after filtration.
However, long blanching times should be avoided in the final soymilk product. [21] Boiling whole
beans in water for 20 minutes also deactivates the enzyme system and most of trypsin
inhibitors. [23]
Processed soymilks prepared by various manufacturing methods were examined for quality by
physical and chemical methods. Viscosity, pH, soluble solids, total solids, fat and protein content
were used as indicators of quality. Processing methods have an effect on the nutritional value of
soymilks. Lack of proper processing may give rise to unpleasant digestive responses. The most
important factor is the heat treatment. There are several "anti-biological factors" present in the raw
soymilk which are heat labile.
Shi and Ren (2000) observed that heat treatment apparently helps to stabilize soymilk emulsion. The
protein molecules unfold and the hydrophobic regions located on the inside become exposed to the
outside when soymilk is heated. In the presence of soy lipids, the stability of the soymilk emulsion is
improved due to increased interaction of proteins with lipids.
The traditional Chinese method for soymilk production is soaking the soybeans for 8-12 hours in
cold water, wash, grinding, filtering and then cooking. Heating, in soymilk is an important step
because it helps in the flavor development, pasteurization, and improving the nutritional quality. [25]
Soymilk has a strong off-flavor that is unpleasant to most western consumers. The benefits of
utilizing soy as food products prompted researcher’s to develop new ways of processing soy to
improve its flavor. Several methods have been proposed to improve the flavor of soymilk, through
processing modifications or modifying the raw ingredient of soymilk. Some examples of processing
modifications are Cornell, Illinois, Rapid Hydration Hydrothermal Cooking (RHHTC), cold-grind
under vacuum (Pro-Soya), deodorization, antioxidant addition and alkali treatment methods. [8]
In Illinois method, the soybean was first soaked for 12 h in 0.5% NaHCO3 solution, drained and
then boiled in fresh 0.5% NaHCO3 solution for 30 min, drained again and ground in water at room
temperature. The soy-slurry was heated to 90C and filtered to remove okra. The soymilk thus
produced has bland flavor. [8]
In RHHTC method, the Soybean was ground into flour and made into slurry using hot water and
then pressure-cooked for 30 sec, cooled and adjusted to 9% solid with water and centrifuged to get
the soymilk. [8]
The Illinois and the RHHTC method incorporate all of the soybean parts into the resulting soymilk
due to high shear of the process. However, the RHHTC method uses a higher temperature (154 C
for 3 s) than the Illinois method (90C). [8]
The Pro Soya and the Cornell method is a modification of the traditional methods. In the Pro-Soya
method, the soybeans are ground with cold water under vacuum to prevent the incorporation of
oxygen into the fatty acid by lipoxygenase. [8]
In the Cornell method, the soybeans were cleaned in order to remove dirt’s and also some impurities
like other seed stalks etc. The beans were blanched in hot water for 30 minutes for the following
reason; to soften the seeds and aid in see coat removal to remove, to reduce the beany flavor and
eliminates the anti-nutritional factors. The beans were the de-hauled and milled with water using the
Kenwood blender, about 3 parts of water was added to the slurry and filtered using a Muslin cloth,
the filtrate was allowed to simmer on fire about 10 minutes it was then bottled and allowed to cool.
Enzyme inactivation is accelerated by inactivation of the enzyme using heat (80 C and above)
during grinding. [26]
Even though it was reported that the processing modifications reduced off-flavor development, each
method has its own advantages and disadvantages in terms of protein and solids recovery. The
traditional and Cornel1 method yield the lowest % solid extraction (55- 65% wt/wt), where the
Illinois and the RHHTC method yield the highest % solid extraction (86-89% wt/wt).
For protein extraction the traditional, Cornell and the Pro-Soya method extracted about 70-80 %
(wt/wt) of protein and the Illinois and RHHTC method extracted about 90-93 % (wt/wt) protein. In
the Illinois and the RHHTC method, all of the soybeans including the okra are included in to the
soymilk and therefore increases its % solid and % protein extraction [27] In the Illinois method,
where soybeans are blanched for 30 minutes, Johnson and Snyder (1978) showed that the initial
blanching step would heat fixed the protein bodies in the soybeans and make it insoluble even after
the grinding step. If the soybeans are ground with hot water, such as in the Cornell method, the
protein fixation does not occur and better extraction can be obtain. Another disadvantage of the
Illinois and RHHTC method is that the suspended insoluble solids may settle out.
Some research suggest that modifying the processing methods by the addition of extra ingredients
such as antioxidants, sodium bicarbonate, oxidize enzymes or masking agents can improve the
flavor of soymilk.
The other application of sodium alkali is by adding it into the soymilk itself. [28] In this case,
Bourne reported that the pH change in soymilk was not the one responsible for the improvement of
flavor but instead it was the concentration of the sodium ions.
The addition of an oxidize enzyme was suggested for flavor removal through oxidation. The
addition of the enzyme would oxidize the already present off-flavor to reduce the amount of off-
flavor (aldehydes to carboxylic acids). Currently, many research works are being done to increase
the yield and productivity of milk and it’s by products from soya and related seeds.
It is a suitable dietary additive in biscuits and snacks because it reduces calorie intake and increases
dietary fiber. Okara protein has good nutritional quality and a superior protein efficiency ratio. The
protein can be extracted from okara at alkaline pH; [32] Ma et al reported that the protein recovery
obtained at pH 9 and 80 °C was significantly higher than when incubated at 25°C. With its high
moisture content, fresh okara is very easily spoiled by microorganisms. In the factory, okara is
usually dried to reduce the low moisture content prior to sale as animal feed. [33]
Okara is dried and then milled in to powder. The okara powder is then mixed with baking powder
and other ingredients and baked for about 170c.
Okra used for different purpose such as animal feed, fermentation substrate, fertilizer and food
products. This paper mainly concerns on the use of okara for oil and flour processing.
On this research work, the attention is mainly given to produce milk, to develop the production
process of milk from soya bean and to optimize its production as a whole using hot and cold
extraction processing method.
there-by improving the soy protein digestibility flash-cooled to 75°C and further cooled to 25°C.
The cooled soymilk was subjected to packaging unit.
Soymilk produced using soybean : below four different methods was analyzed for its physico-
chemical, proximate, lipoxygenase visual assay, and other parameters using standard procedures.
De hulled Soaked with water for 6 Blanching for 20 minute Bleaching for 20 minute
hour
Wet milling De-hull soybean De-hull soy bean De-hull soy bean
Holding for 20 minute Wet mill by hot water at Wet mill by hot water at Wet mill by hot water at
to inactivate LOX 91C 91C 91C
Separation of milk from Holding for 20 minute Holding for 20 minute Holding for 20 minute
okara to inactivate LOX to inactivate LOX to inactivate LOX
Cooking for 20 minute Separation of milk from Separation of milk from Separation of milk from
at 90C to inactivate TI okara okara okara
Flash cooling 75C Cooking for 20 minute Cooking for 20 minute Cooking for 20 minute
at 90C to inactivate TI at 90C to inactivate TI at 90C to inactivate TI
Cooling 25C Flash cooling 75C Flash cooling 75C Flash cooling 75C
Packaging Cooling 25C Cooling 25C Cooling 25C
Packaging Packaging Packaging
Cold extraction (A) Hot extraction Hot extraction Hot extraction
blenching before blanching after socking blanching before
socking (B) time 6 hour (C) socking time 10 hour
(D)
A. analytical methods
pH Value
The pH value of four soymilk samples was determined with a pH meter. Soymilk samples were
placed in room temperature for 2 h before measured.
Color
The color of four soymilk samples was observed by eye at room temperature. Land py represent
lightness and pale yellow respectively.
Total solid (%) = ([weight (dish + dry sample) – weight dish]/ [Weight (dish + wet sample) – weight
dish]) * 100
B. proximate analyses
moisture
About 8 g sample was weighed into a clean dried dish. This was placed on an oven maintained at
105C for 6 hours. The dish was cooled to room temperature and then this was re-weighed and
recorded. Weight of moisture was calculated by subtracting the weight of dried samples from
the fresh.
% Moisture = [fresh weight – dried weight]/ [weight of fresh sample] x 100.
% lipid = [weight of flask and extract –weight of flask]/ [weight of sample extract] x100.
𝜌𝑜𝑖𝑙
𝑠𝑝𝑒𝑐𝑖𝑓𝑖𝑐 𝑔𝑟𝑎𝑣𝑖𝑡𝑦(𝑆𝐺) =
𝜌𝑤𝑎𝑡𝑒𝑟
Determination of color:
The color of the edible oil determined using observation and compared with the standard.
Determination of odor:
The product was smell physically and compared with standard odor.
Soya bean milk, a nutritious product produced from soya bean, can be used as a substitute for cow
milk. Accordingly, the demand for cow milk is used as a proxy for estimating the demand for soya
been milk traditionally processed milk is supplied to the market, albeit there is no quantitative data.
In the absence of data on domestic production and consumption of milk, the Revised Report on the
1995/96 Household Income, Consumption and Expenditure Survey is analyzed in estimating the
demand for the product. Table 4.1 depicts the average consumption of milk by different expenditure
groups in urban and rural areas according to the survey finding.
Average
Number of Annual Total Annual
Income Individuals in Consumption of Consumption
Group the Group milk (ml) of milk (liter)
< 600 17,253 255 4,400
600 - 999 125,904 653 82,215
1000-1399 432,547 3,198 1,383,285
1400-1999 580,104 4,938 2,864,554
2000-2599 4,217,465 4,302 18,143,534
2600-3399 6,498,555 6,118 39,758,159
3400-4199 7,844,772 7,746 60,765,604
9000-12599 5,114,961 12,950 66,238,745
12600-16199 1,765,555 10,603 18,720,180
16200-19999 673,706 11,160 7,518,559
> 20000 972,722 12,864 12,513,096
Total 55,954,227 526,761,355
Source: CSA, Revised Report on the 1995/96 Household
Income Consumption and Expenditure Survey, 2001
As can be seen from Table 4.1, the total consumption requirement of households for milk is
526,761,355 liters. Given a total population of 55,954,227 at the time the survey was conducted, the
per capita consumption of milk is computed to be 9.4 liters.
B. Demand Projection
The current population of Ethiopia in 2016 is 101,577,251 from this 19.4% urban (i.e. 19,705,986)
the demand for soya bean milk is assumed to be associated with the urban population. Therefore, a
rate of growth of 4% that corresponds to the rate of urbanization in the country is considered in
projecting the demand for the product. The projected demand for the product is shown in Table 4.4
Demand
2017 20,494,225
2018 21,313,994
2019 22,166,554
2020 23,053,216
2021 23,975,345
2022 24,934,358
2023 25,931,733
2024 26,969,002
Based on the retail price of cow milk, a price of Birr 12 per liter is recommended for the product of
the envisaged plant.
Distribution of the product could be undertaken through the existing wholesale and retail network
that include department stores, supermarkets, and retail shops catering establishments
D. Site selection
The following are site selection criteria’s that should be considered:
The following assumptions are employed in estimating the capacity for soya bean milk
- soya bean milk can substitute about 10% of the projected demand for cow milk(2019)
- the consumption of soya bean milk will remain limited to urban areas
Based on the market study and assumption the capital requirement and minimum economy of scale,
the Soya milk processing plant will have a capacity of 2,216,655 liters of Soya milk per annum. A
capacity of 7,388 liters per day is considered on the basis of double shifts of 16 hours per day and
300 working days per annum.
The annual production program is formulated based on the proposed plant capacity. Considering the
problem of market penetration and skill development of production at the initial stage of the production
period, it is planned that the plant will start production at 75% and 85% of its rated capacity in the first
and second year of production, respectively. Full production shall be attained in the third year and then
after. The detailed production program is shown on Table 4.5
Production Year
Description Unit
2019 2020 2021-20
Soya bean milk Lit 1,662,491 1,884,156 2,216,655
Utilization of rated capacity % 75 85 100
The major raw material required for producing Soya bean milk is food-grade Soya bean.
Other materials such as detergents and salts are also required in relatively small quantity. In addition to
raw materials, auxiliary materials like, sugar.
Annual requirement of each of these auxiliary materials at full production capacity is given in Table 4.6
the estimated annual cost of the raw and auxiliary materials at full production capacity is about Birr
8,383,300.
Table4.6. Annual requirement of raw and auxiliary materials and their estimated cost
IV. Utilities
The major utilities required by the plant are electricity, water for cleaning, steam, diesel oil, compressed
air, lubricating oil and grease. The annual consumption of these utilities is shown in Table 4.7.
The data obtained and recorded from the laboratory will be analyzed and interpreted by
using measured data. This will be done by evaluating the material balance on each
equipment /steps in the process. The determination of materials that exits and enters to the
process equipment/ unit will help us to determine the scale up of material balance to
industrial level.
4.3.1. Experimental/laboratory material balance
Sorting
Input=output
Rs=Cs+40, Cs=300g
Washing CSin=300g
CSout=300g
Input=output
Soaking
CS out=300g
Water in =900ml remove water
Input=output
=542g
Husk or skin
Pulp=542g
Grinding
soaked soya bean=542g
Hot water=5Cs
Gs=5Cs+542g, Cs=300g
=2,042g
Filtration
Gs=2,042g
In put=out put
Holding tank
Input=out put
Homogenized milk=1,401ml
Destnor
Waste=40g
Stone
Stone=10g
Wet husk=116g
Dry husk=42g
Moisture
In put=out put
Moisture=74g
Wet okara=718g
Dry okra=127g
Moisture
Moisture= 591g
CS
17.63%SCK 6.383%SCK
DE hulling
Drying of husk
Pulp
35.16%GS
Filtration
Drying of okra 2.18%GS
Soymilk product
Batch process
Pulp
Hot water (277%pulp)
GS=3,229,410kg
In put=out put
Pulp=3,229,410/3.77
=856,607kg
Hot water=2.77*856,607kg
=2,372,801 Lit (kg)
Mass balance on De hulling
SCK
Wet skin (17.63%SCK)
Pulp=856,607kg
In put =out put
SCK (soaked soya bean) =856,607/0.8237
=1,039,950kg
Wet skin =0.1763*1,039,950
=183,343kg
Water removed
In put =out put
Dry skin =0.06385*1,039,950
=66,400kg
Water removed=183,343-66,400
=116,942 Lit
Mass balance on soaking
SCK=1,039,950kg
In put=out put
CS+3CS+1.8067CS=1,039,950
CS=179,095kg
Water in=3*179,095
=537,284 Lit
Water removed=1.8067*179,950
=323,570 Lit
Stone (2.94%RS)
Un=23,868kg
Qin=Qouts=2202.6KJ/Kg
Mss = Mf cp ∆T Mf=2,372,801kg/yr=7,909kg/day
Ms*2202.6KJ/Kg=7,909kg*4.18KJ/Kgk* (95-25) k
Ms= (2,314,271KJ/day)/ (2202.6KJ/Kg)
=1,050Kg/day
o o
Soy milk in at 60oc soy milk out 120 C
o
Steam in at 150 C
Assumption
mmix (597+1,194)kg
Vmix= ρmix = kg = 1.95𝑚3 = 1,950lit
(1000∗0.67+753∗0.33) 3
m
1,950
Vmix = = 488lit/cycle
4
If the boiling tank is 80% full in each cycle the volume of the boiling tank is estimated as follows.
488
Vbt = = 610 lit/cycle
0.8
If soaking tank is 80% full in each cycle the volume of the soaking tank is estimated as follows:
637.5
Vst= =796.875lit
0.8
If de-hulling is 80% full in each cycle the volume of the dehulling tank is estimated as follows:
1,150
Vst = 0.8
=1,438 lit
volume on grinding
If grinding is 80% full in each cycle the volume of the grinding tank is estimated as follows:
3,706
Vgr = =4,632lit
0.8
If homogenizer is 80% full in each cycle the volume of the homogenizer tank is estimated as
follows:
1,815
Vgr = =2,268lit
0.8
s α a
Assuming
Operating temperature = 90 0c
H- The fluid height measured from the center of the bottom of the tank to the surface of the fluid
in the tank
a-The depth the bottom extends below the cylindrical section of the vertical tank
R- The radius of the cylindrical section of a vertical tank
α-half of the angle of the cone
S-The hypothnuios of the conical section
Assuming the storage tank is a cylindrical
Where
D 2
VR = π ( ) ∗ 2D
2
3 2VR
D= √
π
D = 0.73m
𝐻 = 2 ∗𝐷 = 2∗ 0.73𝑚 = 1.46𝑚
s 2 = a 2 + R2
𝑆 = 0.393m
a
cosα =
s
α = cos −1 (0.371)
α = 68.20
f=design stress
Take 10 % pressure allowance j=joint factor
N
Pallowance = 0.1 ∗ 0.115=0.0115mm2
Pd = Po + Pallowance
N
=0.1265mm2 = 126,500pa
0.1265 ∗ 0.73
t= = 0.36mm
2 ∗ 150 ∗ 0.85 − 0.1265
Corrosion allowance=2mm
Minimum thickness of storage tank=0.36mm+2mm=2.36mm
Top cover
It required resisting for only the atmospheric pressure
Pd ∗ Di
t=
2fj − Pd
0.101 ∗ 0.73
t= = 0.29mm
2 ∗ 150 ∗ 0.85 − 0.101
By taking corrosion, allowance 2mm
t=2mm+0.29mmt=2.29mm
The calculated thickness for storage tank and its top cover is out of the range, from the given
table below. However, take the nearby standard that is D=1m, t storage and t top cover = 5mm
kg
Viscosity of Water = 0.002822 m.s at 100oc
kg
Viscosity of Milk = 0.004m.s
w
K of soy milk = 0.526 m.kat room temperature
w
K of water = 0.598 m.k
𝑤
K of Stainless Steel = 17.5𝑚.𝑘
Known
Justification
Solution.
NTU = ∆t/∆TLM
NTU=60/31
NTUcold=2
∆Tm = Ft *∆TLM Where Ft= correction factor.
∆Tm = 0.945 * 31
∆Tm = 30
w
H hot= 13,000m2 .k
w
H cold=7,500m2 .k
1 ∆x 1 −1
U=[ + + ]
hhot kss hcold
𝑤
=2700 𝑚2 .𝑘
Nt−1
Nc= 2
Nc = 27
Design of dryer
Selection criteria
characteristics of the raw material
quality requirements on the dry
Economic analysis or cost estimation
safety and environmental consideration
Based on criteria rotary dryer selected and It has high capacity, simple in operation, and continuous.
The soya bean okara at 30oC is to be dried from 20 % initial moisture to 5% final moisture in a rotary
dryer at a rate of (Mso) 127kg/h. The hot air enters the dryer at 120oC with a humidity of (Y2) 0.015.
With condition that the temperature of the solid leaving the dryer must not exceed 105oC and the air
velocity must not exceed 1.5 m/s in order to avoid dust carry over.
CPokra= 3.77 kJ/kg.K.
Wet solid flow rate in to the dryer=158𝑘𝑔/ℎ𝑟
Hg2 = [𝐶𝑃𝑎𝑖𝑟 + 1.88 × 𝑌air in] × [T air in−T Reference] + Yair in× 𝜆
Hg2 = [1.005+1.88 × 0.015] × [120−0] + 0.015 × 2206.2𝐾𝐽/𝑘𝑔
=157 KJ/Kg
Hg1 = [𝐶𝑃𝑎𝑖𝑟 + 1.88 × 𝑌air exit] × [T air exit−T Reference] + 𝑌air exit × 𝜆
Hg1 = [1.005+1.88 × 𝑌air exit] × [65 − 0] ℃ + 𝑌air exit × 2206.2KJ/𝑘𝑔
Hg1=65.33+2,328.4Yair exit
Over all mass balance;
GS × (𝑌air exit−𝑌air in) =ws × (𝑋1−𝑋2) =𝐺𝑆 × (𝑌air exit−0.015)
Gs (Y1 – 0.015) = 25𝑘𝑔/ℎ𝑟
GS = 25/ (Yair exit– 0.015)……………. (1)
MSo[HS2 – HS1] = GS [Hg2 – Hg1]
127 [368.5 – 138.2] = [25/ (Y air exit– 0.015)] × (157– 65.33-2,328.4Yair exit)
The volume of exit gas (air) 65oC = 338K and Yair exit = 0.0312
22.4 𝑇 22.4 × ℋ 𝑇
VH1 = 29 (273) + (273)m3/kg
18
22.4 338 22.4 × 0.0312 338
= 29 (273) + (273)m3/kg
18
= 1.0043m3/kg
The maximum volumetric gas flow rate =GS ×VH2 =1,540Kg/hr∗1.1388m3/Kg= 0.4872m3/sec
Working velocity = 1.2m/s
Area = 𝜋D2/4
4A
D=√π
= 0.723m
Heat transfer unit
Dryer is divided into three zones and therefore, the stage wise calculation of temperature and humidity
of the stream can be obtained by material and energy balance.
Stage III
Very less water left for vaporization in stage III. Consider solid is at TSB, the wet bulb temperature of
the air at location between III & II.
Assume TSB = TSA = 410C
Enthalpy of solid at the inlet to stage III
Stage II
Use heat balance equation over stage IIto calculate the value of TGA. The calculated TGA value can be
used to estimate the number of transfer units. Since Yair in= 0.015
Enthalpy balance
𝑚𝑠 [𝐻𝑆𝐵−𝐻𝑆𝐴]=𝐺𝑆× [𝐻𝐺𝐵−𝐻G𝐴]
101.6[163.65−197.42] = 1,540 × [107.49−𝐻𝐺𝐴]
= 154.2𝐾𝐽/𝑘𝑔
Once 𝐻𝐺𝐴value is known then 𝑇𝐺𝐴can be calculated using the following equation.
𝐻𝐺𝐴=154.2kj/kg=[1.005+1.88×𝑌air exit] × [𝑇𝐺𝐴−𝑇ref] +𝑌air exit×2500
159.21kj/kg = [1.005 + 1.88 × 0.0312] × [𝑇𝐺𝐴 − 0] + 0.0312 × 2500
𝑇𝐺𝐴=72 ℃
At section “A” temperature difference Δ𝑇𝐴=72− 41= 31 ℃
Δ𝑇𝐵= 106.53 – 41 = 65℃
65 −31
Δ𝑇𝑀= 65 =
ln( )
31
= 46 ℃
106.53 − 72
Calculating Number of transfer unit 𝑁𝑇𝐺II= (𝑇𝐺𝐵−𝑇𝐺𝐴)/Δ𝑇𝑀= 46
= 0.751
To validate the assumed value of exit gas temperature that is 𝑇𝐺1=65 ℃ first do an energy balance over
stage one;
GS (𝐻𝐺2−H𝐺1) =Ms (𝐻𝑆2−𝐻𝑆1)
1,540(157–HG1) = 101.6(368.5−197.42)
𝐻G1= 115kj/kg
𝐻𝐺1= 115= [1.005+1.88 × 𝑌air exit] [𝑇𝐺1−30OC] +𝑌air exit× 2500𝑘J/𝑘𝑔
115 = 1.064TG1 + 46
TG1=HG1=64.84
STAGE 1
(∆T)I= 64.84 – 30 = 34.8OC
(∆T)A= 31oC
34.8−31
(∆T) m = 34.8 = 33oC
ln( )
31
72−64.84
Number of transfer unites, NtG1 = = 0.2057
34.8
= 1,603kg/hr. = 0.45kg/s
The gas mass flow rate, G = 0.45/ (𝜋/4×0.7232)
= 1.096 kg/m2.s
Volumetric heat transfer coefficient,
Ua = 237(G)0.67/d
= 237(1.096)0.67/0.723
= 348.7W/m3.k
= 3.3m
Length of dryer, L = NtG × LT
= 2.1 × 3.3
= 6.93m
d = 0.723m and L = 7m
Thickness of the drier shell;
𝑃𝑖𝐷𝑖
ts = 2𝑓𝐽 − 𝑃𝑖
0.135 ×1150
ts = 2 ×135 ×0.85−0.135 = 0.677𝑚𝑚
For the shell minimum thickness is given as 8mm. consider corrosion allowance of 25% therefore,
including the corrosion allowance the thickness can be taken as 10mm.
To find the diameter of feed pipe first find the mass flow rate of air entering
water evaporated in the outlet stream
Y1 = mass flow rate of air entering
water in
0.015 × G +water evaporated into gas stream
(the outlet ) = G
stream
0.015 ×𝐺+42
0.0337 = 𝐺
G = 2246kg/hr or 0.624kg/s
Mass flow rate of feed = 316kg/hr
Density of feed = 454kg/m3
𝑚𝑎𝑠𝑠 𝑓𝑙𝑜𝑤 𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑒 𝑜𝑓 𝑓𝑒𝑒𝑑
Volumetric flow rate of feed = 𝑑𝑒𝑚𝑠𝑖𝑡𝑦 𝑜𝑓 𝑓𝑒𝑒𝑑
316
= 454 = 0.696m3 or 0.7m3
D = 0.134m
With 20% corrosion allowance D = 0.16m
m
Volumetric flow rate of air (Vair) = ρair
0.624
= = 0.0207m3/s or 73.37m3/hr.
30.61
A = 0.017m2
𝑚
Volumetric flow rate of air (V air) = 𝜌𝑎𝑖𝑟
0.624
= = 0.0207m3/s or 73.37m3/hr.
30.61
But let us assume that 15% of the total heat supplied to the drier is loss to the environment i.e
Heat loss from the drier=15% 25.4kw=29.21kw
(𝐷1+𝐷2)
But, A1=𝜋 ∗𝐿
2
0.723𝑚+1.17𝑚
=3.14 ∗ ( ) ∗ 7 = 21𝑚2
2
𝐷2+𝐷3
A2=𝜋 ∗ ( )∗𝐿
2
𝐷2+𝐷3
=𝜋 ∗ ( )∗𝐿
2
1.17𝑚 + 𝐷3
=𝜋∗( )∗𝐿
2
1.17 + (𝐷2 + 2𝑌)
= 𝜋∗( )∗𝐿
2
1.17 + (1.17 + 2𝑌)
= 3.14 ∗ ( )∗7
2
= (25.74 + 22𝑌)𝑚2
A3=𝜋 ∗ 𝐷3 ∗ 𝐿
= 𝜋 ∗ (1.17 + 2𝑌) ∗ 7
= (25.74 + 44𝑌)𝑚2
Insert A1, A2 and A3 into the above equation and re arranging it gives Y=12mm then,
𝐷3 = 𝐷2 + 2𝑌
= 1170 + 2 ∗ 12
= 1,194𝑚𝑚 = 1.194𝑚
Weigh of dryer (W) = volume of shell material*density
(𝐷22 −𝐷12 ) 𝐾𝑔
=𝜋𝐿 ∗ ∗ 7830 𝑚3
4
1.172 − 0.7232 𝑘𝑔
= 3.14 ∗ 7 ( ) 𝑚2 ∗ 7830 3 = 36,402𝑘𝑔
4 𝑚
𝑓𝑡
Peripheral shell speed :50-100𝑚𝑖𝑛
Solid hold up (i.e. fraction of the shell volume occupied by the solid at any time ) 5-15%
NTU from1.5 up to 2
𝜋∗𝐿𝐷12
Volume of drier filled with material= ∗ 0.1
4
3.14 ∗ 7 ∗ (0.723)2
= ∗ 0.15 = 8𝑚3
4
Weight of material in drier at any time ,w = volume*density
𝑘𝑔
= 5.0265𝑚3 ∗ 753 = 3,784𝑘𝑔
𝑚3
𝑣𝑜
𝐷33 −𝐷22
Volume of the insulating material= 𝜋 ∗ 𝐿 ( )
4
1.1942 − 1.172
= 𝜋∗7∗( ) = 0.3117𝑚3
4
Weight of the insulating material=volume*density
𝑘𝑔
= 0.3117*167.1𝑚3 =52kg
The revolution of the drier various between 2 and 5.therefore the above can be accepted.
4.75∗0.723∗8,334+0.1925∗4.37∗88,630+0.33∗88,630
BHP=4 ( ) = 5.3𝐵𝐻𝑃
100,000
33.62𝐾𝑊
5.3BHP*45.08𝐵𝐻𝑃 = 3.95𝐾𝑊
Raw soybean
P-23
Destiner
V-7 V-9 V-13
V-8 V-10 P-26
P-23
Water tank
E-43
Washing tank
E-14
Waste
grinding
V-11 DE hulling
P-27
E-36
P-27
Dry okara
E-40
Figure 4.5. Flow sheet of production of soy milk from soya bean
• Chemical cleanliness – removal not only of all visible dirt but also of
microscopic residues which
can be detected by taste or smell but are
not visible to the naked eye;
It is important to note that equipment can be bacteriologically clean without necessarily being
physically or chemically clean. However, it is easier to achieve bacteriological cleanliness as a
matter of routine if the surfaces in question are first rendered at least physically clean.
In dairy cleaning operations the objective is nearly always to achieve both chemical and
bacteriological cleanliness. The equipment surfaces are there- fore first thoroughly cleaned with
chemical detergents and then disinfected.
Circulatory cleaning-in-place (CIP) systems adapted to the various parts of a processing plant have
been developed to achieve good cleaning and sanitation results.
Cleaning operations must be performed strictly according to a carefully worked out procedure in
order to attain the required degree of cleanliness. This means that the sequence must be exactly
the same every time.
• Recovery of product residues by scraping, drainage and expulsion with water or compressed air;
Disinfection by heating or with chemical agents (optional); if this step is
included the cycle
ends with a final rinse, if the water quality is good. Each stage requires a certain length of time
to achieve an acceptable result.
4.8.5. Programs
Dairy CIP programs differ according to whether the circuit to be cleaned contains heated surfaces or not.
We distinguish between:
• CIP programs for circuits with pasteurizers and other equipment with
heated surfaces (UHT,
etc.).
• CIP programs for circuits with pipe systems, tanks and other process equipment with no heated
surfaces.
The main difference between the two types is that acid circulation must always be included in the
first type to remove encrusted protein and salts from the surfaces of heat-treatment equipment.
A CIP program for a pas- teuriser, "hot components", circuit can consist of the following stages:
3. Rinsing out alkaline detergent with warm water for about 5 minutes.
4. Circulation of (nitric) acid solution (0.5 – 1.0 %) for about 20 minutes at 70°C.
A CIP program for a circuit with pipes, tanks and other “cold compo- nents" can comprise the following
stages:
2. Circulation of a 0.5 – 1.5% alkaline detergent at 75°C for about 10 minutes.
5. Gradual cooling with cold tap water for about 10 minutes (normally no
cooling for
tanks). [10]
Total capital investment of any plant can be including in its side both fixed capital
investment and working capital investment. Total capital investment = fixed capital
investment + working capital investment. To estimate fixed capital investment of the plant,
first find the cost of each purchased equipment cost.
4.9.2. Equipment cost
The installation of equipment involves costs for labor, foundations, supports, platforms,
construction expenses, and other factors directly related to reelection of purchased
equipment. There is general range of installation cost as a percentage of the purchased-
equipment cost for various types of equipment. Installation labor cost as a function of
equipment size shows wide variations when scaled from previous installation estimates.
Table 4.10 shows the cost of selected pieces of equipment.
PEC= 19,084,400ETB
Capital investment is the total amount of money needed to supply the necessary plant and manufacturing
facilities plus the amount of money required as working capital for operation of the facilities. This
project considers the proportional costs of each major component of fixed capital investment as outlined
below determination technique of the cost factors presented here are based on a careful study and
associates plus additional data and interpretations. Purchased equipment cost is 40% of fixed capital
investment cost.
𝑃𝐸𝐶 19,084,400
FCI = = = 47,711, 𝐸𝑇𝐵
0.4 0.4
Direct cost is the type of fixed capital investment costs that directly applicable for plant
erect. It can take 70-85% of FCI range. But used for calculation, 80%. The part of direct
cost listed table 5.2 with range and selected percentage.
The range is on the basis of FCI.
Table 4.11: Direct cost
Direct Range Assumed Cost(birr)
component % FCE
cost
controls
B. Indirect cost
Indirect cost is another type of fixed capital investment cost that aicable for plant erect indirectly.
The table shows categories of indirect cost p art with ranges and selected percentage.
Table 4.12 Indirect cost
Direct Range Assumed Cost(birr)
component % FCI
cost
Therefore:
FCI = DC + IC =33,947,060+ 13,763,940
FCI = 47,711,000ETB
4.9.4. Total capital investment
Therefore, Total capital investment = fixed capital investment + working capital investment
TCI = FCI + 0.15TCI
𝐹𝐶𝐼 47,711,000
TCI = 𝑇𝐶𝐼 = (1−0.15) = 0.85
TCI = 56,130,588birr and working capital will be the difference of total capital investment and fixed
capital investment
WCI = TCI – FCI = 56,130,588-47,711,000
WCI = 8,419,5871birr
Determination of the necessary capital investment is only one part of a complete cost estimate. Another
equally important part is the estimation of costs for operating the plant and selling the Products. These
costs can be grouped under the general heading of total product cost. The latter, in turn, is generally
divided into the categories of manufacturing costs and general expenses. Manufacturing costs are also
known as operating or production costs. Further subdivision of the manufacturing costs is somewhat
dependent upon the interpretation of direct and indirect costs. Fixed charge is 10-20%TPC
= 477,110birr
Subtotal of fixed charges = d + I + LT +LR
= 4,771,100+477,110+ 0 + 0
=5,248, 210birr
(Subtotal of fixed charges)=15% of the total product cost (TPC)
5,248,210 birr=0.15*TPC
TPC=28,988,066birr
a. Administrative costs
= (2-6) % of TPC, take 2%
=0.02*28,988,066
=579,761birr
b. Distribution and selling costs
= (2-20) % of TPC, take 3%
=0.03 * 28,988,066
=869,641birr
c. Research and development costs
= 5% TPC
=0.05*28,988,066
=1,449,403 birr
d. Financing (interest) = (0-10) of TCI, take 3%
=0.03*47,711,000birr,
=1,431,330birr
Subtotal of general expenses is the sum of from (a-d) listed above will be=4,330,135birr
28,988,066
= 2,216,655 = 12birr/lit
Therefore the unit price for soy milk is =15birr/lit (this already determine from market study)
Total income=41,026,543birr/year
Total expense= Manufacturing costs + General expenses
=24,519,976+4,330,135
=28,850,111birr/year
Breakeven point (volume)
Q=1,932,537lit/year
= 41, 026,543-28,850,111
=12,176,432birr
B. Net profit
Recent tax in Ethiopia (30-40) % we take we take the average = 35% income tax.
Net profit= 12,176,432(1-0.35)
=7,914,683birr
C. Payback period
𝐹𝐶𝐼 47,711,000
𝑃𝐵𝑝 = = = 2.1 𝑦𝑒𝑎𝑟
𝑁𝑝 + 𝑑 7,914,683 + 4,771,100
n=12(life of project)
d= depreciation
7,914,683
∗ 100 = 24%
56,130,588
= 7,914,683+4,771,100
=12,685,783 birr
I=12%, d = 4,771,100birr
12,685,783((1+0.12)12 −1)
= p=present worth of an annuity
0.12(1+0.12)12
36,737,723
= = 78,580,487𝑏𝑖𝑟𝑟
0.46
𝑝 =78,580,487birr
Therefore:
NPW = P
= 78,580,487 – 56,130,588
= 22,449,899 birr, therefore the value of NPW is positive the project is acceptable and feasible.
∑18
1 𝑁𝑃𝑊 = + Recovery ( - TCI
Recovery (rec) = 0
12
∑ 𝑁𝑃𝑊 = 0
1
The return obtained from an investment in which all investment and cash flow are discounted.
𝑅((1 + 𝑖)𝑛 − 1)
= 𝑇𝐶𝐼
𝑖(1 + 𝑖)𝑛
12,685,783((1 + 𝑖)12 − 1)
= 56,130,588
𝑖(1 + 𝑖)12
((1 + 𝑖)12 − 1)
= 4.423
𝑖(1 + 𝑖)12
From appendix I, the approximate value of “I” is 0.2016.
Therefore the discount cash flow rate of return (DSRR) is 20.2%; DSRR is greater than minimum
acceptable rate (mar) so, the project is acceptable
Cumulative
Cash flow
Breakeven Point ( BP )
0 project life 12
5.1.SOYMILK
An experiment was conducted to study the effect of different methods used for preparation of
soymilk.. To conduct the research work four samples prepared as follows. In this study, Process A was
cold extraction of Soymilk, Process B was hot extraction of Soymilk treated with blanching before
socking for 6 hour, Process C was hot extraction of Soymilk treated with blanching after socking for 6
hour, Process D was hot extraction of Soymilk treated with blanching before socking for 10 hour.
Soymilk from the four processes were evaluated for their physio-chemical parameters and proximate
composition and summarized as shown in table 5.1 and table 5.2.
Table 5 .1: proximate composition of soy milk
Proximate method A Method B Method C Method D
composition
Ash (%) 0.3 0.45 0.5 0.4
Fat (%) 1.9 1.65 1.85 1.6
Moisture (%) 1.01 1.00 1.02 1.0
Tss 8.25 7 7.40 6.25
Table 5.2: sensory tests panel scores of soy milk processing techniques
Quality attribute Method A Method B Method C Method D
Color Light Pale yellow Pale yellow Pale yellow
Flavors Strongly Beany weakly beany Slightly beany Slightly beany
Taste Strongly rancid Clean milky Less rancid Less rancid
Mouth-feel Less Normal Slightly less Medium
PH 6.5 6.4 6.68 6.62
The experimental data analysis result of the soymilk on the four different samples taken indicate some
variation in their solid yield (%), total solid, fat and ash content as shown on table 5.1 and table 5.2. The
solid content of soymilk for all the samples varied from 6.38% to 8%. The highest solid content is found
in sample A and it is due to limitation of solubility at the time of grinding.
The pH value varies from 6.4 to 6.68. The lower PH value is found in the second method, method B. As
it is shown on table 4.2, the quality of the produced milk is better for method B. the flavor, taste, mouth
fill and its shelf life characteristics of the milk produced using method B is better than the other three.
Hot water
Grinding De hulling
At 910c (pulp) skin
Holding at
850c
Okara
Edible oil
The experimental result indicated that the PH value (5.6), color and specific gravity approach to the
standard. From 60g of okara we got 20ml of edible oil and after oil extracted the bread prepared from
okara flour by proportionally mixing and the following result on table 5.3 obtained.
Table5.3 physical characteristics of okara with wheat flour
Sample Texture flavor Color
25 g okara with 75g wheat flour Soft sweetness Light white
50 g okara with 50 g wheat flour Hard salt Light yellow
100g okara alone Brittle Bitterness Deep yellow
From the above sample analyzed, 25g okara with 75 g wheat flour gives sweetness flavor, soft texture is
acceptable more.
6.1.CONCLUSION
Soy milk of different protein concentration was prepared from different water to bean ratios based on
hot and cold extraction, to investigate how this would affect various physical characteristics of soy
milk particles. The different methods of soy milk preparation are found to influence its protein
content. The differences in protein value might be due to the effects of heat treatments of blanching,
boiling and pasteurization.
The result of the research work shows that the best process of producing soy milk is boiling before
socking. This indicate that temperature have its own effect on the quality of soy milk production. In
addition, the use of soy milk as opposed to soy protein isolates provides a more efficient and direct
conversion of soy bean to edible food products like oil and flour.
Evaluating the economical aspect of the project which is intended to produce milk from soya bean
shows that it is very feasible with attractive working environment and has positive perception by
society with any background.
Lastly, from the experimental work as well as from the project evaluation, it is possible to conclude
that soy milk production by boiling before soaking yields a better product quality which has nearly
the same physical properties as cow milk but with additional benefits like low fat content,
consumable during fasting time and free from any allergic nature is highly feasible economically and
can contribute a lot in the industrialization process of the country.
6.2.RECOMMENDATION
It is already agreed that soya bean is industrial crop with diversified uses. The need of soya food
products are emerging in our country. Investigating the appropriate chain between farmers, processers
and marketers will have high contribution for better quality products including unwanted chemical
formation during harvesting and distribution. In addition, studying the consumers feeling on soya
products is very crucial to make improvement on tastes and odor of the products. Based on the
observation and the research result we recommend that:
Soy food processors and manufacturers selling soy-based products should tailor their products
to the tastes of the individuals who are most likely to buy their products to boost sales.
The soy industry must endeavor to improve consumers’ motivation. Results from the study
shows that this variable act in conjunction with perceived soy health benefits construct to
determine the likelihood of participation and consumption of soy food products. This variable
which is related to diet-disease awareness suggests that an effective marketing tool may be to
highlight the disease element of poor nutrition. Marketers can therefore capitalize on this issue
in their advertising and promotion campaigns.
Finally it is also recommended that government and other stakeholders interested in investing
in the soy industry should do so via the consideration of the producer price incentive
component purchasing, processing and utilization channels to boost the interest of producers
(farmers) to cultivate more, and to provide more employment avenues for the unemployed.
This research work shows that the soy bean products are so diversified and investors who are
interested on then will have enormous opportunities in many aspects and giving attention for
the sector is very timely and prosperous.
REFERENCE
[1].Giblin, James. Milk: The Fight for Purity.
[2]. ^”Food Outlook –Global Market Analysis” (pdf). Food and Agriculture organization of the United
Nations. May 2012. Pp. 8, 51-54
[3]. ^ Gussekloo, S.W.S. (2006). "Chapter 2: Feeding Structures in Birds". In Bels, V. Feeding in
Domestic Vertebrates: From Structure to Behavior. CABI Publishing. p. 22. ISBN 978-1-84593 063-9.
"A remarkable adaptation can be found in the crop of pigeons. During the breeding season the crop
produces a yellow-white fat-rich secretion known as crop milk that is used to feed the nestlings. … The
crop milk resembles strongly the milk produced by mammals, except for the fact that carbohydrates and
calcium are missing in crop milk."
[4]. Khaleque, A., W. R. Bannatyne and C.E. Wallace, (1970), Studies on the processing and
properties of soymilk I.—Effect of preprocessing conditions on the flavour and compositions of
soymilks. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 21: 579–583
[5]. (Osho, 1991).
[6]. (Shurtleff and Aoyagi, 2007).
[7].Laswai HS, Thonya N, Yesaya D, Silayo VCK, Kulwa K, Mpagalile JJ and WRW Ballegu.
2009. Use of locally available flavouring materials in suppressing the beany taste in soymilk.
African Journal of Food, Agriculture, Nutrition and Development; 9(7): 1548-1560
[8]. (Millie Miu-Yee Wong). Effect of Processing Methods on the Chemical and Physical Properties of
Soybean Milks.
[9]. Jacobs, Morris B. The chemistry and technology of food and food products, vol. 2. New York,
Interscience Publishers, 1951. 1769p.
[10]. American College of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology. 2010. Milk Allergy. Available from:
http://www.acaai.org/allergist/allergies/Types/food-allergies/types/Pages/milkallergy.aspx. Accessed
2013 Auguet 17.
[11]. (Naazetal., 2003).
[12]. (AHA, 2000).
[13]. (Fukushima, 2000).
[14]. (Teixeira et al., 2000).
[15]. (Chen et al., 2003).
[16]. (Anderson, 2003).
[17]. Shurpalekar, S.R. Et al. Chemical composition and nutritive value of soya-bean and soya-bean
products. Food Science, Mysore 10:52-64. 1961.
[18]. Wilgus, H.S. Jr., L.C. Norris and G. F. Heuser. Effect of heat on nutritive value of soy bean
meal. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry 28:586-588. 1936.
[19]. Erickson (1995) and Lui (1999).
[20].Wilkens, W. F., Mattick, L. R. and Hand, D. B., Effects of processing method on oxidative off-
flavours of soybean milk. Food Technol., 1967, 21, 1630 –1633.
[21]. (Nelson et al., 1997).
[22]. (Liu, 2005).
[23]. (Weingartner, 1996).
[24]. (Kwok et al., 1995).
[25] .lson, Murphy and Gallagher 1992).
[26]. (WI (Kwok and Niranjan 1995).
[27]. (Golbitz 1995; Kwok and Niranjan 1995).
[28]. (Bourne, and others, 1976).
[29]. (Liu, 1997). Hackler et al (1963)
[30]. (O’Toole, 1999).
[31]. Characteristics and use of okara, the soybean residue from soy milk production. Agric. food
chem.., 1999, 47 (2), pp 363-371
[32]. (Khare et al., 1995).
[33]. Characteristics of Proteins from Fresh and Dried Residues of Soy Milk Production
YupornPuechkamut1,* and Woralak Panyathitipong2
[34]. Resource potential and opportunity study, project identification, selection and profile preparation-
done by Addis Ababa city administration investment authority
[35].Plant economics and design for chemical engineer by Max S.peters and Klaus D.timmerhaus,
1991
Appendices
Appendix I:
Table a: Iteration method
I i +1 (i+1)12 (i+1)12-1 i(i+1)12
(𝒊 + 𝟏)𝟏𝟐 − 𝟏
𝒊(𝒊 + 𝟏)𝟏𝟐
APPENDEX II
Boiling
Expansion area
house
Production
Raw material storage Area
Water
Storage tank
Product storage
n
atio
i n istr g
m in
Ad b u l i d
Water
Treatment area
By product
Clinic
storage
Cafeteria
Toilet
security
APPENDEX III
Weighting of soy bean cleaning of soy bean boiling before soaking soaking after boiling
Clean soy bean Fiber after de hulling Grinding soy bean Temperature
After de hulling with hot water control after grinding
Filtration Okara after filtration Pasteurization of soy milk Soy milk after pasteurize