Professional Documents
Culture Documents
It Department: I.T. Social and Professional Issues 2
It Department: I.T. Social and Professional Issues 2
IT DEPARTMENT
I. OBJECTIVES
explain patchwriting;
explain the importance of patchwriting;
III. TOPIC
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY
Patchwriting
A. Introduction
Patchwriting happens when you rephrase a portion of source material, but your language
remains too close to the vocabulary and/or sentence structure of the original text. All patchwriting is
a kind of paraphrase, but successful paraphrase is not patchwritten.
If you use patchwriting in the final draft of an essay, your teachers will likely see this as an
act of plagiarism since you are not directly quoting the original author or successfully using
paraphrase or summary to put the author’s ideas into your own words. But patchwriting can have its
place in the early stages of note-taking: it can be a useful step in the process of becoming fluent in
the language of a particular field or subject, as long as the patchwriting does not remain in your final
draft.[1]
Content marketers need to have practical strategies in their arsenal to combat patchwriting
each and every day in the trenches. Here are a few to get you started.
If you can’t convincingly answer at least one of these questions, you need a new topic
or change of direction.
Let’s say you encounter the following quotation while doing research on the role of women in
early 20th century college athletics:
Source:
“The logic of separate spheres easily applied to athletics, where physical differences
required separate activities. At college the goals of the womanly woman and the manly man
included physical fitness. Advocacy of physical exercise took hold during the first generation [of
female college students, 1860s-1880], with doctors and educators observing both the dyspeptic
tendencies of the young educated male and the chronic weakness of the female participant.”
Solomon, Barbara Miller. In the Company of Educated Women: A History of Women and Higher Education in
America. New Haven, CT, Yale University Press, 1985, p. 103.
Paraphrase Attempt 1:
Mid-19th century society used physical differences to justify dividing activities into
gender-specific separate spheres. Even though college men and women were both
encouraged to exercise, the exercises they were to perform were divided because of these
sex differences. This was because experts wanted to make sure that college education did
not weaken the bodies of students who needed to be properly manly men, and womanly
women after their school days were over.
If this paraphrase was in your final draft, you’d have a lot of problems. First of all, the
language is too close to the original text without any quotations or citations–phrases like “separate
spheres” and “manly men, and womanly women” are taken directly from the original text without
attribution. This is a classic example of patchwriting, where unfamiliar terminology (“separate
spheres”) is borrowed from the original text.
Paraphrase Attempt 2:
Historian Barbara Miller Solomon has argued that exercise was seen as an important
part of a mid-19th century college curriculum for both men and women, but cultural ideas
about masculinity and femininity meant that each group was using exercise to achieve
different roles in society (103).[3]
I. References
[1]
https://www.beyondplagiarism.sweetland.lsa.umich.edu/for-students/using-sources/patchwriting-
as-a-technique/
[2]
https://www.pr2020.com/blog/6-bulletproof-ways-to-prevent-patchwriting
[3]
https://www.beyondplagiarism.sweetland.lsa.umich.edu/for-students/using-sources/patchwriting-
as-a-technique/
(Optional)
V. ACTIVITY
Checked by: