Professional Documents
Culture Documents
-l
l5l
Part-A / qrrl-3i
obiective / 4rgl+d
Note:- Attempt all lhe 20 Ouestions. Each question carries 1 mark. (Total Marks tor
this Part are 20)
.ie,- r|,rR zo c:i) +,r .r trt ,.11":r{ I tl({)a, ql.l t sro ht{fft t t t (ttt 'Tr,t in aa
lq
oo zo l)
Ouestion No.1
That'A', in good faith tor the benefit of his child but without his consent, knowing it fully
well that death ol the child mighl be caused, il he was subiected to surgery and got hrm
operated upon by a surgeon with intention ot getling the stone removed but the child died.
The acl of 'A' is:-
(A) a cognizable oflence because'A' has not taken required precautio ns belore the
surgery.
(B) punishable under law, if negligence of 'A' is proved.
(C) is not an ollence because'A'did so in good lailh for the benefit ol the child so
he was cured ot the diseasc and therefore his act being covered by the general
exceplion under Section 89 of the lndian Penal Code is protected lrom any criminal
law
(D) is not an otfence because he did so in good taith tor the benelit ol the child without
his consent and therefore is protecled by Section 92 ol the lndian Penal
Code
q:i tl@l I
116 ffi 4" q<"flT{rydo otq.} ftq ,} Fr{a
'i; fit ct ti Rn1 d $qld d filr q6 \+nal
ur<t gl la qia s.ro1 :r"qfuqr of 'ar,i t ,i s u+,'1 1r3 rnfio t) rroff t. qrr0 Br.rqri d
qRPr t Yrdfrqr ororm i, fd{ Rq afl 1 edffii r'o'or tF.q,
(3r) riitq o$.{trr i, +dil$ ae 1.rt ii qi rn' -'t q,if*a qd nrovrftai r& arfi {__l
(q) ftfdo, s-sffq i. qR o' o1 arqrq€ qqlFld +ff i t
(E) rmwr a€t t. oriifu rsi isr r<qr++fdo Fql d Rflp, ftct s€-fr s6qft d
f6-qr t 3rd, ar rrlTdiu srs +iFm ai ql{r gz d er'a,l,r +icBo t t
Oueslion No.2
For how much period an accused, convicled ol non-cognizable offence on the basis ol
complaint, can be sentenced to sutfer simple imprisonment for his lailure to pay to the
complainant lhe cost incurred by him in prosecution:-
(A)
(B)
not exceeding 60 days.
not exceeding 30 days.
tl
(C) not exceeding 15 days.
:6
(D) any other punishmenl prescribed by law bul not exceeding to o ti nal
punishmenl.
Y!.I {BII 2
qR-sr< ql frRerd fs1fi 3r{iil srq' tr d (ffiq 3rftgdfl 6f. clM Er{r srftqtfi t d-6.r
si dl or{rq,ff fr cnrra rci
fu'c .r( q{. fr-f,.ff 3raB tE rnrn"r orrr { d sftsd fuqr iil
soar t :-
(3r) 60 iffs t 3fitr6 3r{tr 6r I
(q) fA0 dnr crfuqd 6f{ rff <,<r}yr. f6-E To rw d 3[86 'r€l r
E
Ouestlon No.3
Which ol the following stalements under Section 436-A ol Code of Criminal Procedure,
1973, is correct for computation ol lhe period of detention undergone by the accused at the
time of his release with or without sureties:'
(A) the period of police custody shall be excluded. E
(B)
(C)
the period of judicial custody during investigation shall be excluded
computation of lhe period of detention shall be dependenl on the
E
(D)
discretion of the court.
lhe period ol delay caused by the accused in completion of the
E
trialshallbe excluded kom the period of his detention. E
crr dan 3
snr 436-6 <-s cfuql €Fm, rsz: d ird,f.I lffi 3rFqffi ol cfrj3{t frEd qr rRd
aft,Frd drrr, w o)3- ori d s,rq lh"E 3r,r0 61 ,ror.lr ori d *iq'q ii otmr opr.r rr$ t:
("r) gfar cfttm d :r.rE 6t 3rqsftid fr-qr qrt n r
(a) srdsq d +{d .qtua, GrFcen q B-sd {6i d 3rqft 6i sqqff-d fu-{r
oni,n t
(E) s1tg6r rRI or{qrfr C fad .rn fud d 6nq ffi {dl ms d sr4E
6\ orrdftid fuqr qr},n I E
Ouestion No.4
Which ot the following statemenls is not correct:
(A) an admission may be proved by or on behalf of the person making it, when it is
of such a nalure that. il the person making it were dead. t would be relevanl as
between third person under Section 32.
(B) an admission may be proved by or on behalf ol the person making it, if it i
relevanl otherwise than as an admission.
(C) an admission is relevanl againsl the person who makes it.
(D) an admission may not be proved by or on behalf of the person making it, when rt
consists ol a staternenl ot the existence of any state ol mind or body' relevanl or
l7l
n issue, made al or about the timc when such state of mind or body existed.
and is accompanied by conduct rendering it as lalsehood and improbable.
q{.I (l&{l ,1
(d) d{ d?'ld sfr rG qrd qifi arl qr swd 3i{ e {rG-d dl w sS,ff
qR TE {dqft a} oq i rfi ft"1 sreut gw.ro t t
(A)
(B)
'A'cannol be convicted because he is not a public servant.
'A'could be convicted, il 'B' had committed the offence for which he was
E
abetted. fl
(c)
(D)
'A'can be convicled for his act
None ol lhe above is conecl.
E
E
rj[it {g[ 5
'O'.
',rl ft \e, .io *qo +ff t 'u, -.j)
fr vqr di'n{6 *. 6l qEratr l+aRur
+s
nEftqq.less o1 qm r d seftr E-s'ftq s{"r{q 6rll-d o{i d filc gdfto orar t, fu-g $
g*{ur d cR'nIR{5c 'd gr{l 6t{ srr|{ru 6rR-d +fi t&qr .rqr B r s-dH -orgfrfi a aSwn i a
rff {s d €drr il diflir t6ern ffi }:
("t) 'tF' o) <tqfu{ rfi foqr w {6dr i. mlft ct dro
tro; rff }l
(e) '6' 6) ffiq
fu-qr sr srdr qn. qR g A dr{r 46 3rrr{rq arRo or iiqr
.rvt ddr ffi
lln rd gdRa fu-m ,rqr pnr
(s) 'o' a) rra; q.a d ftri ffi<
fulr ur s6dr I t
(s) sqtffi il i oid ow 961 o6 *,
Question No.6
The act of a witness in refusing to sign his statement after his evidence is recorded in
the court, causes otfence under which Section of the lndian Penal Code. 1860:-
(A) 180 lndian PenalCode. fl
(B) 178 lndian PenalCode.
E
(C)
(D)
181 lndian Penal Code.
E
The witness has not commitled any otfence. His act being ot trille nature,
he cannot be proceeded against in view of Sectjon 95 of the lndian penal
Code
g$r ti@r 6
qmros d sqe ]nt{ ti d sq\id, sni rm c+qi 6!Iq T{ 6{inEr{ 6-{i r) 5on axi ot
Ed. qRAs <os rift-dr d dl{ff qm or 3rrflq 6rR-d 6{ar t:-
O) {r{ftq q-€ riG-dr d sNr r8o 6Il
(E) qrntq srs {iFdt d qnr i78 6l
O qrnftq q.s riFcr d qm rar ort
(s) {ftff i 6t{ 3rwrs rfi f&fi i adtu rro 6u go rqfr or tti *.
rfl.<x. d qRr ss d 3rd,id 6rffi *.q rS t I E
Question No.7
({) 3rr.rRlq I
Ouestion No.8
The accused, who is already convicted lor otlence punishable under Section 19 oi ihe
Narcotic Druqs and Psychokopic Substances Act, 1985, again commils an oflence and is
convicted, can be awarded penalty of death senlence under Section 31-A ot the said Acl on
proot of lhe lact that he was folnd in possession ot morphine irr which o, the lollowing
quantities:-
iel
E
(A) 500 gram.
(B) 1250gram.
(c) 1000 gram.
(D) none ol the above
g {.r {{4IT 8
{sEo 3iqe) \r.r rll g.rfi qcrel qEJirrq.rsas .ff qr{I lg + or<'lo Eoe'fl4 elqwt d fird
Itrd q af&r d]{r cr qqwrqr$l.r "st w) .ff cgn 4 ,rqqm e\ftg 6ln q thrg.t r o) q tt rt +
d 3rlrlicj rlq ius e') ,i id! d fia-i 'rt*t .r,t ,5d 'j qlfl Jfl-ll..rEIFE $rt 'rrqrq'l i -
(g) 500 rTtl I
(q) 1250 I
(1r)
'T.l
1000 qlq I
Queslion No,g
When a case is translerred by a Sessions Judge under the provisions ol Section
228(1Xa) of Code ol Criminal Procedure, 1973, to the Chiel Judicial lvlagiskate or any other
Judici;l Magistrate of lirst class, thereupon such l\ragistrate shall try ihe otfence in
accordance with the Procedure:-
(A) For the trial ol warrant cases or summons cases, as the nature ol case
(B) For the trial of warrant cases instituted on a police report.
(C) For the trial ol warranl cases instituted other than on a police report'
(D) For the lrial of summons cases
qFI {rell I
f$d irlr qrurffq cm i6S qrqd ol ltqRur ri tli Scrr -vrEo qfil*e qI fu6
({
rrq cm {,i {rfuo r@c ol trm zze(r) (6) E-s qfu{rr tiRm d qnqn'i d 3[f id. nidRd
E-m omr B. a< tsr q&rie r:s qrqd or tIqRUI s{ qfu{I d er5{rn ot'n'
(3{) ftfi voqq qfi B, q"rlq aRrc qmd qt q,n qwdl $ trunu tg fatro
cfuqr t
"efr
({) gfas R.trJ qr dllerd ER-c qrrel d faqrq d firi qfu'a t
(v) gfdfl IilrC i F.q :rrirR .rs {Rard qn-e ,rr{cil d fr{r"r ai sfu-ql I
Ouestion No.10
The inlerim compensation under Section 143-A of the Negotiable lnstrument Act, 1881.
shall be paid within sixly days from the date of the order and lor how many days such penod
may be extended further, by ihe Courl on sufficient cause being shown by the drawer of the
Cheque:-
E
E
(q)
(E)
,rd k{ i GqE-o r
t,rqim ;l d 6l{.ff.rfit
E
E
Question No.11
Whoever abets an otfence punishable with imprisonment shall, il that ottence is not
committed in consequence ol the abetment, and no express provision is made for the
punishment of such otlence, be punished with:-
(A) Same punishment as is provided for main ofience.
(B) l\,4ay extend to one]oudh part ol the longest term ol imprisonment for
that ollence; or with such fine as is provided for thal offence, or with both.
(C) May exlend to one-half part of the longest term ol imprisonment provided
tor that otfence, and with fine.
(D) lvlay extend to one third pan ol the longest term of imprisonmenl provided lor
that oflence; or with such fine as is provided lor that oflence, or with boih
grf;I gBIt lt
d ot{ onmrs t <"g.tq 3lr{q ar g*t"i otn. qfq qt orwtl vff g+rq d qRqrqssq
i fuqr qd 3if{ i$ g*{"r d ftN ffi EEc 6t 3rE-{n ssiq T€t fdqt .w i. d (trg-d tuqr
qlTrlll
(3r)
(()
r+rn'i qss
rs srrrqE
t, d * ftd t
fu Cq s{q{u
d ftc sttiifi-d onrqm
I
'A' is tried for the murder ol'B' by intentionally shooting him dead.
The fact that 'A' was in the habit of shooting at people with intent to murder them, is:-
(A) relevant
llrl
(B) irrelevant.
(c) admissible in evidence.
(D) relevant but inadmissible in evidence
qY.t tfgll 12
'q' Hn&I 3r{FI cm 'ff' d aq alR-o rri d on"r r.sr d fiq fi.rrfltr d t w .rea f4; 'q'
dl w vrfr rtql oG d ftiq 3 rrq t ersc 6{i qI:-
6r srEFiI
(3r) g{.rf, t I
(s) tu{i.F t I
({) ii t
(s)
wrm
g{i.rd
nrEa
t la-d wra d urqr
t
rfi it E
Ouestion No.13
'A' has obtained a decree for the possession of land against'B'. 'C" B's son, murders
'A' in consequence. The existence ol the judgement isl-
(A) relevant.
(B) irrelevanl.
(C) inadmissible in evidence.
(D) none of the above.
qri {iaarr 13
Question No.14
When the Court calls for a document and the document is not produced after nolice to
produce, the Court:-
(A)shall presume thal such document was attested, slamped and executed
in lhe manner required by law.
(B)may presume lhat such document was attested, slamped and executed
in the manner required by law
(C)shall not make any presumplion.
(D) it is a presumption of lact which depends on tacts and circumstances ol
the case.
l12l
gFI qBII 14
qd .qrqrdq dltr f6$ (Fri.n 6l ts F{i ol 3tQeTr 61 ort B eis EEIr}.f qYr 6{i d
qfir d c{.Trq t{ c-fi f6qt drdr i, ,rq .qrqroq'
(or) sqrmqr olzn fo tsr etrns fiE anr oi,llFd ron i srgwrFra. ettrrd 3f{
(n)
ft'anff6 ftqr Tqr qrl
sqtlnsrl 6i rd,n b tsr (Rri.n f4D am erifurr s6n i 3rjqqrFrd.
E
Erfud 3ft FqrEa f$-ql rrur erl r
Question No.'15
(i) rri"il I
(ii) aqs or l,l,rfl fi q.rR ,,,,r frr{ut. ad qc E fiq,rdt ,rcrd cfd ur vsd fd+
rr) t
(v) f"jr iFr fi,dl ft q6r1 ar ffslq. 4t ,16 fid Fterlrdl treipi sho qr ssq\ la+
rlt
srrtnr d d +t+cr c-S t,-
(3r) (i) {#t i I
E
(s) (ii) {lff t I
E
(q) (ii) s (iv) 1Ia t I E
(<) sqt.rrr (i), (i), liii) .r (v) tttt rS i r
E
lrrl
Ouestion No.l6
The Presiding Olficer of lnternal Complaints Committee conslituted under lhe Sexual
Harassment ol Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal)Act. 2013, shall
hold ollice for a period:
(A) not exceeding three years lrom the date of nomination. E
(B) two years which may extend upto four years from the date of appointment.
(C) not exceeding five years from the daie of nomination
(D) three years which may extend to tour years lrom the date of appointmenl
u?'l 1l{e.rIT 16
6rf€rd q{ rrF. sd d dfl6 s.ffs.i (iiflq, qf Eq \d qltrd}s) ef}F-q,t, zots d :rf,fd
.rBo snnrfid flFFErd {difa ot dral$'< qB,nrfr. w w erqE aar v}tt-
(3I) qi6'i 01 li{i6 n d{ .r{ i 3nFI6 3r4ff tE I E
(q) ftgfda dl ft+io t <) q{ ro. RrS .Il{ q{ ro aarqr ut rrrm Bl E
tq) {rqi61 q,l 1Y{i6 t cia s{ t 3rqEo 3rqB d I E
(4 FrCAit d 1- {16 t ,fu qd 4. ffi zn a{ 4, {.dIqI if,I q4,n.l i I
E
Oueslion No.l7
An accused, who transmits sexually explicit material depicting children online, which is
punishable under Section 67-B of the lnlormation Technology Act, 2000, shall be tried
(A) Special Court established under POCSOAct.
(B)
(C)
Sessions Judge or Additional Sessions Judge.
Judicial MaOislrale lst Class.
E
E
(D) Chiel Judicial Magistrate. tI
q{{ gErII t7
3rftTff, "it {"i.Fi dl lirfia +ri qr,fi, dltr+ +yue orc md qlqfl o) 3r'i'r.irf,r
oti
ciftd 6rdr i. :.t tt qo+ Ersitffi 3rFlBfl zooo +1 qroi oz-<s d l.r'ld c-s{iq i. itrmt
fuqrcq fuqI srn n:-
Gr) ffi vqz S r"r,in ,rBa faRIE a'tqrdq dRI E
E
I
Question No.l B
Adoption proceedings under the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protecton o, Children) Act.
2015, shall be disposed off by the Court within a period ol:
l14l
E
(A) one month lrom the date ol liling.
(B) two months lrom the date of filing.
(c) three months lrom the date of liling
(D) six months from lhe date ol filing.
fr;vir aru (ercroi ol ?sts 3i1 fr{ervr) 3rEff{'q, zors d sr<rrlo Erno qsr +nlqflq)
oI fidmq qFnarq Em c[dE .S rftrr fd-{I
(3I) or{a fbd vri d orffa .l vo"[tfl:-
qr6 d ,Ilcv
E
r
Ouestion No.19
When an Otficer of lhe lcensee or supplier disconnects lhe supply line of etectricjty
upon detection of theft of electricity, he shall make a complaint in writing relaling to
commission of such otfence in police station within:
(A)24 hours.
(B)48 hours.
(C)72 hours.
(D)any time within a week.
q{l dsr re
m{ 3[g{& rft qr lr<I{r6al 61 3rE[s,T{I, ftqd d .ilfi 6r ..tdr d,ri q{ fagd d !r<rq ifif,.i
Et 3r€dBd orar t. ra .r5 (sr wru orR-d ftrd
"ri d driu n gfue *n d fafua frrorra
ol.l -
(3r) zr rii i E
E
r
(<) re ql il
E
t
(s) zz til t
fl
r
Ouestion No.m
Which of the following staternenls is correct in relalion to procedure lo be tollowed by
Special Judge for the trial ol cases under the Prevention ol Corruption Act, 1988:-
(A) procedure prescribed lor trial of Sessions cases shall be followed.
(B) procedure prescribed fortrialol warrant cases shall be followed.
(C) procedure prescribed lor trial ol summons cases shall be followed.
(D) Special Judge may ,ollow any procedure keeping in view the gravity of
ollence.
rs 13 LP.r l15l
u?;t {t{41 20
qEraR ltsr{q c{Eftqq, 1e88 d or.rrtra ftltle.nnmffYr dRr qmal t} ftats '} fird
u+grq di .,ni {rd ql6qr ,$ {i,jq q dr.cr +erq [S ],_
' (3r) .i{rc qr[dl J la-dRq d fA\ DFd qfu-{r 6I }rls{ur b-fl mrt'll I
Gi q-.iz qr{di d fi-ar{"r .r iad EB.r ffiFfl ,-rr u1+nu fuot ut}'n t
(,c) q{r qFldt o D arq d ftq Aft-d vf6d' ,r,r 3rlrr{q f+fl .rld'rr I
(.) Jqrnr.ff,p ..n or gR.r.r rui g( faRIE arffft{ trffi'tl cBot 6I
3r$r{q 6{ F+ifl t I
ilhl
PART.B /qFI_ {
SUBJECTIVE/DESCBIPTIVE
fa'q!ftt /ani{r{6
Note:- Ouestion no.21 to 40 carry 3 marks each and question no.41 and 42 carry'10
marks each. Ootal marks for this part are 80)
.rlc,- crl *ett-2i i r&o tg : do l*rtfto i, G qrl dwplr a tz. r$o lg
lo. ro eio
f+rfftd I I ( Es rrnr ig Ea do ao g
t17l
Ouestion No.24 (3 Marks)
ln what circumstances can the Coun of Sessions cancel the bail? Can the bail
granted by the High Court be cancelled by the Court ol Sessions? Explain the legal position.
q$I rr--{ I 24
tcl.r -qmrdq d a(r ldn <:rrort il wrr+,r i:l<r.r ol ';l qoil ? .nrr
i r-l
-rrtqrd4 aj
i
rRrd.FR o1 .r{ wnlo ml Q{c aitqrdq g1{r ftrR foTr w wa.ir ? faE,r f}rh wE 6l I
Ouestion No.25 (3 Marks)
While narraling the limitation lor taking cognizance ol the otfences, explain the
situalions in which cognizance can be taken after expiry of the period ot limitation.
u{{ {i({r 25
e{wFil d winr.l ol qRtftqr3ii +l sFi.{ o{i gq,
'rr <{not.nl u< ol f}r<l
qtttfl,n
ora d era{rc d qrara .ff c\4fl.r ft{I .dr s.F B t
Ouestion No.26 (3 Marks)
When and in what circumstances can a Courl ol Sessions summons an accused.
who has been lett out from the charge-sheet by the lnvestigating Otficer, to stand the trial
with othar accused?
qvl ticqr zo
rFE rtFi ldr t
qltftefdd t)zc.qr{[.rq, qo orftgorr fil$ rriqq 3{for0 dm
t
snitq-q: tqts f?qr ,r{.'r t. ol 3rffirr .nq 3rFiTff d flrI Eqr{"r ori ig crqo 6{ rlo(n -l t
Oueslion No.27 (3 Marks)
What prevenlive action can be taken by the law and order machinery under the
Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention ol Atrocities) Act, '1989? Explain.
uYl rcrfl 27
s1{fuo qrit r;j srnfr (u.qEn{ ftqRq) ir{*frqq. lsse d dir.id lnft oi)r "r+*er cr, ETrr [&s
qfir d dll
F1-dR6 ordqrS ,fi t;lr +r;nrff I r rqe r
l13l
u {.I gc{t 29
slfl lreTr S{ qr;r6 riEft{rq. 2006 d {id i Bq q{ dg lc.c"t l,rfuC l
llei
Ouesllon No.34 (3 Marks)
Whether a Special Court constituted under the Protection of Children lrom Sexual
Otlences Act, 2012, can examine the child at a place other than lhe Coud? Discuss with
relerence to relevant provisions.
cYl rsfi 35
qqt dFrs 3trfldi fr sL16t a,l s{eIDI qBli'r1.2012 'i r''r'k llaa Hq qrurc{
fd l qr"to d qffr -qrqr"rq t 8i trfr r,rg q{ 6r sodr B ? gs{a qrsqr.i d rr<,i ii
loirc a1ftri t
lz0t
Ouestion No.39 (3 Marks)
Wrile short note on any three of the following in context of Food Safety and
Standard Act, 2006:-
ct{ gql 39
liq ii ri f6d ff'l qq rEr.l gieJr g.l
' ,r4i grDfiqq. zoos d rrfll ,).{g ft'q,fi
fttu{,
(i) Conlaminant. 0 H{r.tr | (1 Marks)
(ii) Food additive. (D 1srfl dq6 | (1 Marks)
(iii) Food. (ili) gIfl I (1 Marks)
(iv) Linsale food. (v) org{f*d sr{ I (l Marks)
(v) Adulterant. (v) 3ITI 4 I (1 Marks)
(ii) ln what kind ol cases the presumpiion can be raised as to lhe documents under
the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985?
[2tl
1*-cqon s) !r6{srl i +drqo o,\wff qo,rl,wr8 q<ld 3IEIEm, less a}
(iii) What are the exceptions to murder under Section 300 of the
tndian penalcode? (2 Marks)
q{(ftrr (o'q {ili,fi .6 !1fi-300 .ri cr<'ht "trul 6 ;rt'r A orqqrq d ?
of his house situated at Ganpati Nagar, Jodhpur. Upon hearing the sound of motorcycle'
Kishore tried to prevent him lrom taking his motorcycle away ln order 10 cat'h
hold ol him'
Kishorearmedwith'lathi'ranbehindhim,raisingthesound'chorchor'andinflicteda'lathi'
blowathisback.aSaresultofwhichl\,4aheshlosthisbalanceandfellonthegroundWiththe
motorcycle. On hearing hue and cry, lhe residents ol locality, who were all fed up with
lrequent incidents of thefts, came there and they started beating Mahesh. as a resull of
which he sustained multiple iniuries. Someone inlormed the police conlrol room so lhe police
also arrived at the place ol occurrence- The police rernoved Mahesh to hospital in injured
condition. Mahesh succumbed to his inluries during treatment On the tirst information
lodged by Ganesh, the brother of N,4ahesh, the police commenced investigalion and
thereatter liled charge-sheet against live accused lor offence under Section 302 ol the
lndian Penal Code.
Durinq the trial, stalement of the doctor, who conducted the postmonem on the
body of Mahesh, was recorded as a prosecution witness. The doclor, in his statement,
Hs 13 LP ( I22l
opined lhat Mahesh died due to internal injuries sustained by btunt weapons, leading to
excessive bleeding and resultant shock. The lnvestigating Otficer proved the arrest of the
accused and on the basis ol the information given by them recovery of'lathis' used in the
incident. No olher cause could be established for the death of l\rahesh even from lhe
poslmortem report. The police otlicials, who took Mahesh to the hospital, when produced as
prosecution witnesses, deposed that Mahesh was subjected to beating by the accused white
he lay on the ground, with 'lathis' and 'dandas'. No witness was produced by the accused in
detence. However, they took the delence that they acted in exercise of their right of private
defence to properly and that they did not have any intention to cause any murder. Their
delence was also that the iniuries sustained by tvlahesh were nol sullicient in the ordinary
course of nalure to cause his death. Mahesh died only because he could nol get timely
treatment.
(I) qtcr d fu orffq or { 6{i 6r oT,rrR t G dr'A q}A qiR'qi { rrm {6dr t, f{qi6 10.
ro.zora ol qirora s e$ qqqfr +n, dugr I fi{t{ + qq d srqi Td ts{rfr qtewrSf$d 6\
ao or d ori a.n. na Eo-shr ffin;a d qrqrq $161, elr.t *clgrgfr-d 6i d ffi t
ffi d ftrn qir d fr ar0 d-oq d,r t mr cf{ rari gq d1gr ot{ ${r+1 ffa w tr6n fbqr
l+rd o< rg-cl d tdr dar *eqsr{fua qBo Fn .rrrl I ird yi{ {To{ ffi d dq ,t 3r .rn.
qi a{rn ft-n d {& dful t :rw pi 3li{ sdi qiyr ol qr{r U5 aq icqr ffi v{r$ 6rd *A
e, { t sS qrq ftEm i gfrff f+iaq os ol q)r 6q frqr d't gfus rff ffi w el ,r{ r r+im
5ftfl i {fsr ol qrra srrel ,i sfsrdra i rff ctrar f6g sqqn d dt{c rnvr o1 a.g 6i.r{ r
qi{ d qr{ .rq{ A{r (S oG ,r$ RqrJ cI srlsrrn d qran fi;str{ {kd ed cia qfud d
ific4 qNr-3e2 qRffq sre fiF,il S 3iil.ld Ers{tq srq{]u d fd'i qrt}q-q+ q{ fr-qr rrqr I
fa-{trq d <t{H qFrdrsr cer i qin d :rq or qlwrJq ori srd ftfudrd or {qn
&r+< ocrqr. Effiri T{6 qi{r d yro{ d 3ridft6 qd n g< 6fuqR t ord rtrct d 6R"r 3ridft6
Eq t 3r€Eo rm*=rq ali i rcrd ctr6 A stl+l ,1q dcr {dr{r ,rql tt3[JH.,']n crErdrt i
3rftSffiqur 6t FrqER 6r s{dt i}rcritfl qi qear i rgm arBrii ol e$re osi d trteq fl t r
dreqrdq ffiJ n rilr d a.g 6r o}$ 3rq orrur re.'rftd rfi $ t qtsr o} orwore a sri Erd
gFmoffdi i oqra lbqr ft sftgffi,lol snq w frrl gv rfu .d drf-idd n qnqe ac si t t
3reg6rrq i qfirer i oi{ rluq t$ {dl d r rqrq qa fr 3ir t trd rrd rqir lii .rA
fb aftgmw 3rrrff sqft +1 ffi cflfr{ea d arfusrn 6r scq},r fl € e} ottq
'r+a faff o1 5.g
orR-o ori ol ontrq -1S erl I $16r {6 fi a;r+ qr fu qtsr o1 dz fi{i d ft( flql{ 3rg6q
n 1q orfto 6{i d iac qqtq rfi A. sftq sm w rqft-c wun rS Frf,+ t r:-rrd 5q g{
ir
OR / sllmr
1231
(Il) On 22.08.2018, Vinesh, who was a habitual drinker, demanded Rs.500/- lor liquor
lrom Ram Prasad while he was going to hospital in village Rampura at 10:00 AM. Ram
Prasad used to donate money lo people but he re,used to give money to Vinesh saying that
he would not give money for such a sin. Vinesh got annoyed by refusal and inllicted a blow
with sharp edged knile upon Ram Prasad. Ram Prasad stopped the blow by his right hand
and it caused excessive and proluse bleeding in his hand. Vinesh ran away,rom there but
some persons came there hearing the cries of Ram Prasad and put him in an ambulance
but he could not reach hospital as tyre ol ambulance got punctured on the way. Ram Prasad
died because heavy and excessive bleeding. An FIR was lodged by driver ol ihe
ol
ambulance and a charge-sheet was filed after investigation against Vinesh lor the otlence
punishable under Section 302 lndian Penal Code.
The doctor, who conducled autopsy, deposed in the court that death of Ram
Prasad was caused due to shock occurring because ol excessive bleeding by injury caused
on his right hand. lnvestigating Otficer gave evidence of recovery of knile on disclosure
made by Ram Prasad. ln FSL report the blood group found on knile was same as thal ol
Ram Prasad. The persons taking Ram Prasad in ambulance also deposed that they were
told by deceased that Vinesh demanded money lrom him and intlicted a blow ot knife on
refusal.
Vinesh took the plea ol innocence while examined under Section 313 ol lhe Code
of Criminal Procedure. lt was also argued by the delense lhat Ram Prasad gave grave
provocation to Vinesh saying him drinker and Vinesh had no intenlion to cause the death ol
Ram Prasad and his death was not caused by injury inflicted, rather it was caused because
he could not get medical aid timely.
0l) .rio wrgrr t 1?.lio zz.oa zola +\ cld, ro d$ \,FI {Btrflr< ss(TIiI ull t6l 2[ dii fu']Yl
i wrnqnE i rrw fl;t ti ftd qa rlr sqd d qi,r ol t srqc{[< sit .id o] tqd <n orm
rr,n en. i lii1 qi $-{i} ti Q rr ori gq rFfl.r,{ f+ql ft k},m d fiq rr.r rfi itr t
{,trflrE d ff) ri <mu tiror fd}pr:t BsS $q{ qRqr arq, +l or li,q f}i <rqrcr< i 3rci
<rBi 6l-|I ,]1 iro t&+, ff,"1 rcd rqd a,r qr ercqFlqi <mrerq ri.J o{l t qt isor fuisl
qri q) ',nl'r{r fu-.q qo eh {qrtn< d fucdri d) 3lratq STor {61 3ti fr{ Bd gqiht i
dtn* er+irrra ori of vrg rxi ii t'"gris or cr{{ riqir{ d qri t} qr enrora afi vga tror
eih rs.d qr€t (.i 3{(qf+6 {flsn .} .FRulle d,t{ t 1gitq q} arrr qrao cp qprBdl
c"J orr$ .r{ $i 3r5riqr{;i qr.nr ftriu;i Eq.< qrsd-{ o,s tii} ifi tmt goz d 3ltfti
<us.ftq Grq{u s} f&t 3irO.r -re unyr
fuur.ru t
:rs qfier"r orjt qrd fnfbiso i qrqrcrq d crqei oen f+{n ffi ll,trqr< qil Te
ircqBo rd srq d orror $g t. d f+, srrd ofti au w c( vrrld d orwr gor wr
ir{srTr{ $Erorfr .'l qrqrrTtc ,ff qfir w {tq wms o{i o1 enq O t t $l.\q.vd. ffiJ i
HS 13 t.P-I l2al
srq w $S {ff q6 6r rim qTqI fifl, ql f6 Tro {F qrE 6T edl I {r'Insr< c,] Irg+g t a
Erd ?iFrt i oerc fu{r 16 Trf n ir'd rm'lt qt ft ifi$ i ${rn I'rd {t elir g*ntr
"rri
ori qq s$.i arqt qn Ect t
fti:r i,l.n 313 <trs qf$rjl *iirm d er<fa qfierq d qrq fffq iti otsfiarq
ftqr | {q|q cer 01 cilr t {6 $ {Effi d 'd fa, {rqffir< i i*in o) :mfl 66 fi 'ri
rFfl-{ sq
t ro)ftd fusl sllt ssfiI 3 {ru {rqffirE d 1q orR-.r ori or +ff en 3t{ rrqsr < d Tcq si
3rd # d oi.r"r r€t g{. d1'cd, n{q q{ lilaifiotq .TEI{dr i ftai *i g{ t t
l25l