Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Declaration: By submitting this assessment (Parts 1 – 4) for marking I declare that it is entirely my own work. I understand that falsely claiming that
the work is my own is malpractice and can lead to NEBOSH imposing severe penalties (see the NEBOSH Malpractice Policy for further information).
Important note: You must refer to the document ‘Unit IG2: risk assessment – Guidance and information for learners and Learning Partners’ while
completing all parts of this assessment. You’re learning Partner should provide you with a copy, but it can also be downloaded from the relevant
resources section for this qualification on the NEBOSH website.
Part 1: Background
Hazard category and Who might be harmed What are you already What further controls/actions Timescales for
hazard and how? doing? are required? further actions Responsible
to be completed person’s job title
(within …)
People and machinery at the Inspection of the workplace 1. Isolate the flammable storage 01 Week Project Manager
workplace already implemented areas from other parts of the (1,2)
FIRE
construction site
Patrol gallons and other Regular housekeeping done to Site Engineer (3)
flammable chemicals were Petrol is highly flammable clean the flammable materials 2. Provide automatic fire alarm
02 Weeks
away from the sparks producing system in the flammable storage
placed near the electric and at ambient room
area area
board. Highly flammable temperature may catch fire Safety Officer (4,5)
small spark can cause the resulting in burns, respiratory 3. Install water sprinkler systems in
the flammable storage area 03 Months
fire. issues, hypothermia and
death may occur. 4. Appoint competent supervisor for
Raw materials and oils etc. ensuring the flammable storage
areas are regularly inspected. 01 Month
may also be burnt and
destroyed caused heavy loss 5. Provide fire resistant uniforms,
of property / financial loss shoes, and gloves
02 Weeks
Workers , Public Workers work on the scaffolds 1. Stop the work. 01 day Project Manager
(1,2,3)
WORK AT HEIGHT
Heading or moving for work Scaffolds have been erected by
There found workers the competent persons 2. Areal platforms should be Site Supervisor (5,6)
purposes can cause Fall from 03 Months
working on elevated height can result in broken provided to stand firmly
PPEs have been provided to HSE Trainer (4)
scaffold without using full bones serve lead to death provided with surrounding grills
work at height
Noise Workers and visitors Frequent job rotation of workers 1. Ear muffs/ ear plugs (PPEs) 03 days Project Manager
is practiced near the noisy area should be provided to the (All the Points)
High noise was produced by Due to the higher noise workers
the construction machinery exposure tingling in ears of
Manual Handling Workers shifting the cement Job rotation is the main existing 1. Training should be provided on 01 Week Mechanical
bags and other materials control measure to reduce the the hazards of manual handling Engineer (1,6)
excessive manual handling effects on the workers/ handlers
at different tasks at work site There was severe risk of 2. Provide fork lifters to shift heavy 02 Months
due to non-availability of musculoskeletal disorders due loads Project Manager
mechanical devices, for the to excessive manual handling (2,3,7)
transportation of cement activity leading to back pain, 3. Provide handheld trollies for
01 Week
bags, loading, unloading etc. muscular pain, and spinal disc carrying loads to short distances Site supervisor (4,5)
injuries.
4. Frequent rests/ breaks should
01 day
be made part of activity
Store Keeper Provided the short breaks 1. Replaced the chair with 01 week Project Manager
good head support and (1,2)
ERGONOMIC
Sitting in ergonomically unfit adjustable chair
Store keeper was sitting in chair for extended hours may recommended star chair Safety Officer (3,4)
the chair without head cause WRULD, back pain,
support and back is very fatigue, shoulder pain. 2. Rearrange the work station
2 days
hard and non-adjustable. 3. Conduct the risk
1 week
assessment of work station.
Hazardous Substances Workers and General Public The Workers were using safety 1. Appropriate breaks and shift 01 day Project Manager
helmets with visors rotations should be practiced (1,4,5,6)
Heavy construction dust
Heavy construction dust is
prevails at the site and
produced from excavation, Workers were provided with 2. Provide a limit for the exposure 02 days Safety Officer (2,3,7)
surroundings producing a risk
demolition, handling and safety boots to dust and implement the
of skin irritation, allergies
mixing of cement system
(Dermatitis), asthma,
Spray of water was being done
respiratory problems and
in the morning and evening 3. Strict monitoring and 01 week
lungs disease
supervision should be
implemented
Moral, general legal and financial Number of accidents is highest in the construction in the world. Companies have also realized that workers are of utmost importance for
arguments the good place in the market. Those companies having good moral values for the workers are more respected by the customers and
company employees. It is the moral duty of employer to take responsible care of the workers, take care of their health and safety,
provide them safe workplace, safe equipment, and welfare facilities. If the employer do not fulfill the moral duty of care then he may
face serious consequences of losing skilled workers, loss of morale, increase sickness, increased staff turnover rate and losing
competitive advantage.
If I look into the position of workers in the country then they are not in the position to stop the humiliation by the employers and fire them
from the jobs. ILO conventions and recommendations provide protection to the workers against the austerity measures of the employers
and ensures their protection from all the threats to their health and safety. Legally, as already stated, company is bound by law to provide
resources and protect the employees. Following legislation if found useful regarding the actions and hazards.
ILO C-155 and R-164 require article-3 (m) “prevention of fires and explosions and measures to be taken in case of fire or explosion”
(https://www.ilo.org/dyn/normlex/en/f?p=NORMLEXPUB:12100:0::NO::P12100_ILO_CODE:R164)
R-156 of ILO asks the employer to provide protection against dusts, noise and vibration
(https://www.ilo.org/dyn/normlex/en/f?p=NORMLEXPUB:12100:0::NO::P12100_ILO_CODE:R156)
Non-compliance may lead to the enforcement notices, compensations, fines, court cases, closure of business and even imprisonments.
The main aim of business if to earn profits while all the above three hazards cost money to the business which may directly or indirectly
reduce the profits and even may lead to loss. Therefore, the organization have to protect the people (workers, public, visitors,
contractors) from the adverse effects of these hazards to save the money to be incurred on many provisions. The costs may be linked
with loss of raw materials, low standard products, loss of productive hours, loss of production time, damage to plant and machinery, staff
turnover etc. all these will cost some money to the organization and it will in the benefit of company to protect the employees etc.
Action Flammable chemicals should be kept away from welding (Hazard Category: Fires)
Specific legal arguments ILO C-155 and R-164 require article-3 (m) “prevention of fires and explosions and measures to be taken in case of fire or explosion”
(https://www.ilo.org/dyn/normlex/en/f?p=NORMLEXPUB:12100:0::NO::P12100_ILO_CODE:R164)
Consideration of likelihood AND severity The likelihood of ooccurrence of fires from the welding activity is high in the presence of flammable materials because sprinter,
sparks and spatters produced from welding equipment is may cause huge fires which may damage the lives of the workers,
raw materials, vehicles, machinery by heat and smoke which may also claim lives of the trapped workers. The severity of the
hazard will be high.
How effective the action is likely to be in The action will have a positive impact on the health and safety of workers. Keeping the flammables away from the welding place will have a
controlling the risk. This should include: good impact in controlling the hazard. The action will stop the fire hazard and save the life and property of the workers and organization.
the intended impact of the action;
justification for the timescale that you I have selected a timescale of 02 days for the completion of action and the action will be completed successfully as the shifting of flammables
indicated in your risk assessment; may be easily completed.
and
Whether you think the action will fully It is hoped that the risk of hazard will be controlled completely and effectively.
control the risk.
Action RPEs should be provided to the workers to work in the dusty environment (Hazard Category: Hazardous Substances)
Specific legal arguments ILO C-170 article-13 (f) where recourse to the above measures does not suffice, the provision and proper maintenance of personal
protective equipment and clothing at no cost to the worker, and the implementation of measures to ensure their use.
https://www.ilo.org/dyn/normlex/en/f?p=NORMLEXPUB:12100:0::NO::P12100_INSTRUMENT_ID:312315
Consideration of likelihood AND severity Due to the careless nature of abrasive blasting operators and avoidance of the use of PPEs and other measures the likelihood of
injuries and adverse health effects is high and inhalation of sand dust and particles suspended in the air will also be high in the
absence of protection measures. Due to the severe health effects like silicosis, allergies and asthm of abrasive dust the severity of
injury will be high;
How effective the action is likely to be in Controlling the shot blasting/ abrasive blasting activity by poviding RPEs will have a good and positive impact on the health of workers and they
controlling the risk. This should include: will be protected from the risk of hazard. This will enable to protect the operators and other exposed persons from health and safety effects like
the intended impact of the action; injuries and respiratory issues. The main problem of Silicosis will be controlled effectively which may result in prevention / control of lung cancer
justification for the timescale that you and other respiratory problems.
indicated in your risk assessment;
and I have given a timescale of 04 days for the completion of action as it will need to get approvals, managing finance and purchase from the local
Action Ear muffs/ ear plugs (PPEs) should be provided to the workers (Hazard Category: Noise)
Specific legal arguments R-156 of ILO asks the employer to provide protection against dusts, noise and vibration
(https://www.ilo.org/dyn/normlex/en/f?p=NORMLEXPUB:12100:0::NO::P12100_ILO_CODE:R156)
Consideration of likelihood AND severity Likelihood of damage to the hearing of workers and others is qiute high due to previsou injury records and loss of hearing due to
continuous exposre to the noise above threshold and its severity will be equally high due to regular use of cutting, grinding, pressing
equipment and machinery.
How effective the action is likely to be in Measures like provision and use of PPEs to the wokers and other exposed pesons will reduce the effects of noise significantly and other
controlling the risk. This should include: measures like noise barriers, workers rotation and workload management will also be effective and reduce the hazardous effects of
the intended impact of the action; noise. The main contributor will be the above action.
justification for the timescale that you I have given a timescale of 03 days for the completion of action which will include approvals, finance, purchase and provision to the
indicated in your risk assessment; workers.
and By using ear muffs/ ear plugs the hazard will be controlled effectively within timescale of 03 days and the time will be enough for the
Whether you think the action will fully complete action.
control the risk.
Planned review date/ period with According to company policy the risk assessment will be reviewed after 01 year and the review date will be 08-05-2023. Risk
reasoning assessment can also be reviewed after any accidents, change of machinery, new induction, change of laws and standards and other
special conditions.
How the risk assessment findings will be Risk assessment findings will be communicated to Managing Director, General Manager, all Managers, supervisors, safety officer,
communicated AND who you need to tell engineers and workers. Management is more important to be informed about the assessment findings. I will prepare reports and will
send to the management through e mails. I will create a WhatsApp group and will post my findings in the group. Assessment findings
will also be displayed on the notice boards. I will arrange a lecture and will deliver my findings to workers by using multimedia
system. Assessment reports will also be discussed in safety meetings.
How you will follow up on the risk I will arrange meetings with Health and Safety committee to find out the progress against each action. I will prepare a checklist to
assessment to check that the actions check the status of implementation and to know whether the proposed measures are being followed or not. If any action looks like not
have been carried out going to be completed on time, I will talk to Finance Manager to arrange additional resource for the completion of the action. I will
also talk to Safety Officer and Operation Manager to submit follow up reports on weekly basis. I will also make surprise visits of the
workplace to check the progress and the implementation of proposed actions. I will follow up with workers, supervisors and
maintenance staff. If necessary actions were not implemented on time I will arrange meeting with relevant authority i.e. Director and
give explanation about the benefits of health and safety culture in an organization. Safety tour of the site could also be conducted
for higher management to witness HSE arrangements of the site. Lack of any resources will be arranged by the relevant people.