Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Section Number : 01
Experiment Number : 07
Name :
Student Number :
Class :
Submission Date :
2.0 Materials and Equipment Used:
I. Unknown Aluminum Specimen for testing.
II. Tinius Olsen Tensile Testing Machine
III. Vernier Caliper
IV. V notch sample holder
V. Hammer
VI. Extensometer
3.0 Testing:
3.1 Graph:
Page | 2
3.2 Computer Readout:
Fanshawe College
Metallurgy Lab
Operator: Manish, Liton, Abishek
Test Date: 06/09/2022
Sample: Aluminium
Sample No.: 1
Diameter, in: 0.500
Final, in: 0.410
Initial Gage, in: 2
Final Gage, in: 2.41
Modulus, ksi: 11010
OS @ .2, lbf: 10650
Ultimate, lbf: 13910
4.0 Calculations:
Data measured and got from computer read out of the supplied specimen are as
follows:
Page | 3
2.408-2.00
= *100%
2.408
= 16.94%
0.1963-0.132
= *100%
0.1963
= 32.75%
10650 lbf
=
0.1963 in²
= 54253.69 lbf/in²
= 54253.69 Psi
Ultimate Load
IV. Tensile Strength =
Initial Area
13910 lbf
Page | 4
=
0.1963 in²
= 70860.93 lbf/in²
= 70860.93 Psi
5.0 Question: Determine the type of aluminum alloy you have been provided based
on the experimental information compare your experimental results with reference
sources for the following alloys: 2011-T3, 2024-T351, 6061-T6 and 7075-T6.
Answer:
Comparison of Mechanical Properties of the Unknown Aluminum Specimen and the
Reference Aluminum Alloy is given fin the following table:
Compared to the standard value with the supplied aluminum specimen it can be say
that the supplied specimen is Aluminum 2024-T351.
6. 0 Conclusions:
Percentage of difference between the experimental value and the theoretical value of
mechanical properties are given in the following table:
Page | 5
Supplied 2011-T3 2024-T351 6061-T6 7075-T6
Mechanical
Specime Std. % of Std. % of Std. % of Std. % of
Properties
n Value Diff. Value Diff. Value Diff. Value Diff.
Tensile 70860.93 55000 28.83% 68000 4.2% 45000 57.46 83000 14.62%
Strength %
(Psi)
Yield 54253.69 43000 26.17% 47000 15.43% 40000 35.63 73000 25.68%
Strength %
(Psi)
% of 16.94 15 12.93% 19 10.84% 17 6% 11 54%
Elongation
Table 2 : Percentage of difference between the experimental value and the
theoretical value of mechanical properties
From the above comparison, it is evident that the value of the mechanical properties
of the supplied aluminum specimen is closer to the theoretical value of aluminum alloy
2024-T351 compared to the other aluminum alloys. It can be concluded that the
Supplied Aluminum Specimen is 2024-T351.
7.0 References:
1. https://www.emjmetals.com/pdf_indexer/pdfs/Aluminum.pdf
2. Technical Report Writing guide provided in FOL.
Page | 6