You are on page 1of 12

201

Induced magnetic field influences on blood flow


through an anisotropically tapered elastic artery
with overlapping stenosis in an annulus
Can. J. Phys. Downloaded from www.nrcresearchpress.com by NANJING UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY on 06/04/13

Kh. S. Mekheimer, Mohammed H. Haroun, and M.A. El Kot

Abstract: A mathematical model for blood flow through an elastic artery with overlapping stenosis under the effect of in-
duced magnetic field is presented. The present theoretical model may be considered as a mathematical representation to
the movement of conductive physiological fluid through coaxial tubes such that the inner tube is uniform and rigid, repre-
senting a catheter tube, while the outer tube is an anisotropically tapered elastic cylindrical tube filled with a viscous in-
compressible electrically conducting fluid, representing blood. The analysis is carried out for an artery with mild local
narrowing in its lumen, forming a stenosis. Analytical expressions for the stream function, the magnetic force function, the
axial velocity, the axial induced magnetic field, and the distribution of the current density are obtained. The results for the
resistance impedance, the wall shear stress distribution, the axial velocity, the axial induced magnetic field, and distribu-
tion of the current density have been computed numerically, and the results were studied for various values of the physical
parameters, such as the the Hartmann number Ha, the magnetic Reynolds number Rm, the taper angle f, the maximum
height of stenosis d, the degree of anisotropy of the vessel wall n, and the contributions of the elastic constraints to the to-
tal tethering K.
PACS Nos: 47.63.cb, 47.65.cb
For personal use only.

Résumé : Nous présentons un modèle mathématique de l’écoulement sanguin dans une artère élastique avec chevauche-
ment de sténoses sous l’influence d’un champ magnétique. Ce modèle théorique peut être vu comme une représentation
mathématique du mouvement d’un liquide physiologique conducteur à travers des tubes coaxiaux où le tube intérieur est
uniformément rigide et représente le cathéter, alors que le tube extérieur est un cylindre élastique anisotropiquement co-
nique rempli d’un liquide visqueux incompressible et conducteur qui représente le sang. L’analyse est faite ici pour une ar-
tère avec un léger étranglement local formant une sténose dans son lumen. Nous obtenons des expressions analytiques
pour la fonction de courant, la force magnétique, la vitesse axiale, le champ magnétique axial induit et la distribution de
densité de courant. Les résultats pour l’impédance résistive, la distribution de la contrainte de cisaillement à la paroi, la vi-
tesse axiale, le champ magnétique axial induit et la distribution de densité de courant, ont été évalués numériquement. Les
résultats ont été étudiés pour différentes valeurs des paramètres physiologiques, comme le nombre de Hartmann Ha, le
nombre magnétique de Reynolds Rm, la conicité f, la hauteur maximale des sténoses d, le degré d’anisotropie de la paroi
du tube n et la contribution des contraintes élastiques à la liaison totale K.
[Traduit par la Rédaction]

1. Introduction flexible plastic tube (catheter) is inserted into the artery. An-
giography, which is used for diagnosis, is the most common
Stenoses in the arteries of mammals are a common occur-
type of heart catheter procedure. The insertion of a catheter
rence, and for many years researchers have endeavored to
model the flow of blood through stenosed arteries experi- in an artery will form an annular region between the walls
mentally and theoretically. The deposition of cholesterol of the catheter and artery. This will alter the flow field,
and proliferation of the connective tissues in the arterial modifying the pressure distribution, and increase the resist-
wall form plaques that grow inward and restrict blood flow. ance. Therefore, it is important to study the effect due to
Catheterization refers to a procedure in which a long, thin, the presence of a catheter in the physiological artery flows.
To have a fuller understanding of the development of
these diseases, an accurate knowledge of the mechanical
Received 16 August 2010. Accepted 2 November 2010. properties of the vascular wall together with the flow char-
Published on the NRC Research Press Web site at cjp.nrc.ca on acteristics of blood are indispensable. Thus relevant infor-
22 January 2011. mation is deemed to be of great help in the treatment of
Kh.S. Mekheimer.1 Department of Mathematics, Faculty of vascular diseases and also to bioengineers who are engaged
Science, Al-Azhar University, Nasr city 11884, Cairo, Egypt. in the design and construction of improved artificial organs.
M.H. Haroun. Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Perhaps the actual cause of abnormal growth in an artery is
Education, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt. not completely clear to the theoretical investigators but its
M.A. El Kot. Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Science, effect over the cardiovascular system has been determined
Suez Canal University, Suez, Egypt.
by studying the flow characteristics of blood in the stenosed
1Corresponding author (e-mail: kh_mekheimer@yahoo.com). area. Although the applicability of a purely mechanical

Can. J. Phys. 89: 201–212 (2011) doi:10.1139/P10-103 Published by NRC Research Press
202 Can. J. Phys. Vol. 89, 2011

model for such a physiological problem has obvious limita- Fig. 1. Schematic diagram of a catheterized overlapping stenosed
tions, vascular rheology together with hemodynamic factors artery.
are predominant in the development and progression of arte-
rial stenosis [1].
Can. J. Phys. Downloaded from www.nrcresearchpress.com by NANJING UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY on 06/04/13

Many recent studies have considered the effect of a mag-


netic field in stenotic arteries for a Newtonian and non-New-
tonian fluids, but in all of these studies the effect of the
induced magnetic field have been neglected. The first inves-
tigation of the effect of the induced magnetic field on peri-
staltic flow was studied by Vishnyakov and Pavlov [2],
where they consider the peristaltic MHD flow of a conduc-
tive Newtonian fluid. They used the asymptotic narrow-band
method to solve the problem and only obtained the velocity
profiles in certain channel cross-sections for definite param-
eter values. The effect of a moving magnetic field on blood
flow was studied by Sud et al. [3], and they observed that
the effect of a suitable moving magnetic field accelerates
the speed of the blood flow. Srivastava and Agrawal [4]
considered the blood as an electrically conducting fluid,
consisting of a suspension of red cells in plasma. Also,
the problem on a tapered blood vessel segment having an
Agrawal and Anwaruddin [5] studied the effect of a mag-
overlapping stenosis. Ismail et al. [15] studied the power-
netic field on blood flow by using a simple mathematical
law model of blood flow using an overlapping stenosed ar-
model for blood flow through an equally branched channel
with flexible walls, executing peristaltic waves using a tery where an improved shape of the time-variant stenosis in
long-wavelength approximation method; they observed that the tapered arterial lumen is given and the vascular wall de-
for flow blood in arteries with arterial disease, such as arte- formability is taken to be elastic (moving wall).
With the above discussion in mind, the goal of this inves-
For personal use only.

rial stenosis or arteriosclerosis, the magnetic field may be


utilized as a blood pump when carrying out cardiac opera- tigation is to study the effect of an induced magnetic field on
tions. Eldabe et al. [6] studied the effect of the induced the flow of a Newtonian fluid (as a blood model) through an
magnetic field on the peristaltic transport of a non-Newto- anisotropically tapered elastic artery with overlapping steno-
nian fluid (biviscosity fluid), where the authors analyzed the sis in an annulus. The problem is first modeled and the non-
peristaltic flow of an incompressible electrically conducting dimensional governing equations are formulated. The
biviscosity fluid through an axisymmetric non-uniform tube, nondimensional governing equations in the case of mild
under the considerations of long wavelength and low Rey- stenosis and the corresponding boundary conditions are pre-
nolds number. Recently, Mekheimer [7, 8] studied the effect scribed and then solved analytically for the axial velocity
of an induced magnetic field on the peristaltic flow of a and the axial induced magnetic field. The results for the re-
couple stress and micropolar fluids. sistance impedance, wall shear stress distribution, axial ve-
The important contributions of recent years to the topic locity, axial induced magnetic field, and distribution of the
are referenced in the literature [9–12]. Some studies consid- current density are discussed for various values of the prob-
ered an overlapping stenosis in the blood vessel segment lem parameters. Also, the contour plots for the stream func-
subject to pulsatile pressure gradient. Chakravarty and Man- tion and the magnetic force function are discussed. Finally,
dal [13] noted that the problem becomes more acute in the the main finding of the results are summarized in the con-
presence of an overlapping stenosis in the artery instead. cluding remarks. This study may be important in understand-
The effect of vessel tapering is another important factor that ing magnetic resonance angiography (MRA), which is one of
was considered. Chakravarty and Mandal [14] formulated the methods of radiological investigation into atherosclerosis.

2. Formulation of the problem


We consider a viscous incompressible electrically conducting Newtonian fluid of viscosity m and density r flowing through
coaxial tubes, such that the inner tube is uniform and rigid, representing a catheter of radius a1, while the outer tube has a
finite length L with overlapping stenosis. The outer tube is treated as an anisotropic linear viscoelastic material. Let (r, q, z)
be the coordinates of a material point in the cylindrical polar coordinate system, where the z-axis is taken along the axis of
the artery, while r and q lie along the radial and circumferential directions, respectively. The system is stressed by an external
radial uniform magnetic field of strength HoR/r, which gives rise to an induced magnetic field H(hr, 0, hz), and the total mag-
netic field will be H+(HoR/r + hr, 0, hz). The geometry of the elastic (moving wall) arterial wall of the time-varying overlap-
ping stenosis for different taper angles (see Fig. 1) is expressed as,
  
d cos f 94 32 32 3lo
Rðz; tÞ ¼ ðmz þ Ro Þ  ðz  dÞ 11  ðz  dÞ þ 2 ðz  dÞ2  3 ðz  dÞ3 UðtÞ; dzdþ
lo 3lo lo 3lo 2
¼ ðmz þ Ro ÞUðtÞ; otherwise ð1Þ

Published by NRC Research Press


Mekheimer et al. 203

where R(z, t) denotes the radius of the tapered arterial segment in the constricted region, Ro is the constant radius of the nor-
mal artery in the non-stenotic region, f is the angle of tapering, 3lo/2 is the length of overlapping stenosis, d is the location of
the stenosis, dcosf is taken to be the critical height of the overlapping stenosis, and m = tan f represents the slope of the
tapered vessel. We can explore the possibility of different shapes of the artery, viz., the converging tapering (f < 0), nonta-
Can. J. Phys. Downloaded from www.nrcresearchpress.com by NANJING UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY on 06/04/13

pered artery (f = 0), and divergent tapering (f > 0). The time-varying parameter U(t) is taken to be,
UðtÞ ¼ 1  bðcos ut  1Þexp ðbutÞ ð2Þ
where b is a constant, u represents the angular frequency of the forced oscillation, and t is the time.
The governing equations are:
1. Maxwell’s equations
r  Hþ ¼ 0; rE¼0 ð3Þ

r  Hþ ¼ J with J ¼ s½E þ me ðV  Hþ Þ ð4Þ

@Hþ
r  E ¼ me ð5Þ
@t

2. the continuity equation


rV¼0 ð6Þ

3. the Navier–Stokes equation


 
@V
For personal use only.

r þ V  rV ¼ rp þ mr2 V þ me ðJ  Hþ Þ ð7Þ


@t

where E is the induced electric field vector, V is the velocity vector, J is electric current density vector, me is the magnetic
permeability, and s is electrical conductivity of the fluid.
Combining (3)–(5) we obtain the induction equation,
@Hþ 1
¼ r  ðV  Hþ Þ þ r2 Hþ ð8Þ
@t z
where z = 1/sme is the magnetic diffusivity.
Now we assume the velocity vector V = (Vr, 0, Vz), where Vr and Vz are the velocity components in the r and z directions,
respectively.
The governing equations of motion of the arterial wall when it is subjected to inertial forces, surface forces, and the forces
of constraint representing the reactions of the surrounding connective tissues, are given by [1, 16–18],
     
@2x @x @Vz @Vr @h Tto  Tqo Et h s q @h @ 2 x
Mo 2 þ Cl þ Kl x ¼ m þ jr¼Ro þ þ þ 2 ð9Þ
@t @t @r @z @z Ro 1  s q s t Ro @z @z
   
@2h @h @Vr h @2h Eq h h @x
Mo þ Cr þ Kr h ¼ p  2m jr¼Ro þ 2 Tqo þ Tto 2  þ st ð10Þ
@t2 @t @r a @z Ro ð1  s q s t Þ Ro @z
in which Mo = roh + Ma, where ro and h are the mass density and thickness of the arterial wall, respectively. (x, h) represent
the displacement components of the vessel wall along the axial and radial directions, respectively, while (Tto, Tqo) are the in-
itial respective viscoelastic stress components acting along the longitudinal and the circumferential directions. Kl, Cl, and Ma
represent (per unit area) the spring coefficient, the frictional coefficient of the dashpot, and the additional mass of the me-
chanical model, respectively, in the longitudinal tethering, and Kr and Cr are those in the radial direction. Eq and Et are the
Young moduli in the circumferential and longitudinal directions, respectively; sq and st are the corresponding Poisson ratios.
The boundary conditions are given below.
1. On the arterial wall, the velocity and induced magnetic field boundary conditions are taken as,
@h @x
Vr ðr; z; tÞ ¼ ; Vz ðr; z; tÞ ¼ ; hr ¼ hz ¼ 0 on r ¼ Rðz; tÞ ð11Þ
@t @t

Published by NRC Research Press


204 Can. J. Phys. Vol. 89, 2011

2. On the catheter wall, the normal component of the velocity, the axial velocity, the radial and axial induced magnetic field
vanish. These may be stated mathematically as,
Vr ðr; z; tÞ ¼ 0; Vz ðr; z; tÞ ¼ 0; hr ¼ hz ¼ 0 on r ¼ a1 ð12Þ
Can. J. Phys. Downloaded from www.nrcresearchpress.com by NANJING UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY on 06/04/13

We introduce the following nondimensional variables,


c 0 dc 0
r ¼ Ro r 0 ; z ¼ lo z0 ; u¼ u; x ¼ lo x 0 ; h ¼ lo h 0 ; Vr ¼ V; Vz ¼ cVr0
lo lo r
lo 0 clo m 0
R ¼ Ro R 0 ; t¼ t; hr ¼ Ho hr0 ; hz ¼ Ho hz0 ; p¼ p; Mo ¼ rRo Mo0
c R2o
rc2 0 rc2 0
Cl ¼ rcCl0 ; Cr ¼ rcCr0 ; Kl ¼ K; Kr ¼ K; Tto ¼ rc2 Ro Tto0
Ro l Ro r
0
Tqo ¼ rc2 Ro Tqo ; h ¼ Ro h 0 ; Et ¼ rc2 Et0 ; Eq ¼ rc2 Eq0 ð13Þ
where c is the velocity averaged over the section of the outer tube with radius Ro.
Using (13), after dropping the primes, (3) and (6)–(10) can be written as,
@hr hr @hz
þ þb ¼0 ð14Þ
@r r @z
 
@Vr Vr @Vz
d þ þ ¼0 ð15Þ
@r r @z
   2 2
  
For personal use only.

@Vr @Vr @Vr @p @ Vr 1 @Vr 2 @ Vr Vr @ðhr þ R=rÞ @hz


Re d b3 þ d Vr þ Vz ¼ þ d b3 þ þ b  þ S2
Reb b  hz ð16Þ
@t @r @z @r @r 2 r @r @z2 r2 @z @r
   2 2
   
@Vz @Vz @Vz @p @ Vz 1 @Vz 2  @ Vz @hz @ðhr þ R=rÞ R
Reb þ d Vr þ Vz ¼ þ þ þ b d þ S2
Re  b hr þ ð17Þ
@t @r @z @z @r2 r @r @z2 @r @z r
       
@ðhr þ R=rÞ R @Vr @Vr @ @ R b @ @ðhr þ R=rÞ @hz
b ¼ d b hr þ þ bhz  b d Vr þ Vz hr þ þ b  ð18Þ
@t r @r @z @r @z r Rm @z @z @r
      
@hz R @Vz @Vz @hz @hz 1 @ 2 hz 1 @hz 2
2 @ hz
b ¼ hr þ þ bhz  b d Vr þ Vz þ þ þ b ð19Þ
@t r @r @z @r @z Rm @r2 r @r @z2
   
@2x @x b @Vz  2 @Vr @h Et h @h @2x
b2 Mo þ bC l þ K l x ¼  þ d b j r¼1 þ b ðT to  T qo Þ þ b s q þ b ð20Þ
@t2 @t Re @r @z @z 1  sq st @z @z2
   
@2h @h 1  2 @Vr @2h Eq h @x
b2 Mo þ bC r þ K r h ¼ p  2d b j r¼1 þ Tqo h þ b2
Tto  h þ bs t ð21Þ
@t2 @t Re @r @z2 1  s q s t @z

The appropriate equations describing the flow of a Newtonian fluid in the case of a mild stenosis d ¼ ðd=Ro Þ  1 , subject
to the additional condition ½b ¼ ðRo =lo Þ ’ Oð1Þ [19] can be written as,
@hr hr
þ ¼0 ð22Þ
@r r

@p
¼0 ð23Þ
@r
 
@p @ 2 Vz 1 @Vz 2 @hz R
¼ þ þ S Re hr þ ð24Þ
@z @r2 r @r @r r  
@ 2 hz 1 @hz R @Vz
þ ¼ Rm hr þ ð25Þ
@r 2 r @r r @r

Published by NRC Research Press


Mekheimer et al. 205

Kl x ¼ 0 ð26Þ
 
Can. J. Phys. Downloaded from www.nrcresearchpress.com by NANJING UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY on 06/04/13

Eq h
p ¼ Re Kr þ  Tqo h ð27Þ
1  ns 2q
where Re = rcRo/m is Reynolds number, S2 = H20me/rc2 is the Strommer number (magnetic force number), n = st/sq is the de-
gree of anisotropy of the vessel wall, and Rm = smeRoc is the magnetic Reynolds number.
The corresponding boundary conditions (dropping primes) are,
 
d @h @x
Vr ðr; z; tÞ ¼ ; Vz ðr; z; tÞ ¼ ; hr ¼ hz ¼ 0 on r ¼ Rðz; tÞ ð28Þ
lo @t @t

Vr ðr; z; tÞ ¼ 0; Vz ðr; z; tÞ ¼ 0; hr ¼ hz ¼ 0 on r¼e ð29Þ


where
  
94 32 3
Rðz; tÞ ¼ ðm z þ 1Þ  d cos fðz  d Þ 11  ðz  d  Þ þ 32ðz  d  Þ2  ðz  d  Þ3 UðtÞ; d  z  d þ
3 3 2
¼ ðm z þ 1ÞUðtÞ; otherwise ð30Þ

d a1
m ¼ lo m; d ¼ ; e¼ ð31Þ
lo Ro
and e is the radius ratio (the ratio between the radius of the inner tube and the radius of the outer one).
For personal use only.

3. Solution of the problem


The solution to (22) with the boundary conditions (28) and (29) shows that hr = 0, (i.e., the continuity of the normal com-
ponent of the magnetic field across the boundary results in an induced magnetic field in the radial direction of zero). From
(26) and (28), we can see that x = 0, where Kl = 0, and for (d/lo << 1) we can assume that h = exp(–kz), where k represents the
wave number of the harmonic oscillation. After some straightforward calculations, the solutions of the axial velocity and axial
induced magnetic field, together with the corresponding boundary conditions, will be in the forms,
 
@p=@z 2ag1
hz ðr; z; tÞ ¼ 2 ar 2 þ 2 þ g2 rg þ g3 rg ð32Þ
g 4 g

@p=@z
Vz ðr; z; tÞ ¼ ½a0 ðg 2  4Þr2 þ a1 g1 logðrÞ þ a2 ðg2 r g  g3 rg Þ þ g4  ð33Þ
g2  4
 
Eq h
p ¼ Re Kr þ  Tqo exp ðkzÞ ð34Þ
1  ns 2q
From (32), the current density distribution will be in the form,
ð@p=@zÞ
Jq ðr; z; tÞ ¼ ½2ar þ gðg2 rg1  g3 rg1 Þ ð35Þ
Rmðg 2  4Þ
The corresponding stream function (Vz ¼ ð1=rÞð@j=@rÞ and j = 0 at r ¼ e) is,

Published by NRC Research Press


206 Can. J. Phys. Vol. 89, 2011

( " 2#
@p=@z 2 4 4 2 2 rr
jðr; z; tÞ ¼ 2
a0 ðg  4Þðr  e Þ þ ð2g4  a1 g1 Þðr  e Þ þ 2a1 g1 log e2
4ðg  4Þ e
 
g2 ðrgþ2  egþ2 Þ g3 ðrgþ2  egþ2 Þ
þ 4a2  ð36Þ
Can. J. Phys. Downloaded from www.nrcresearchpress.com by NANJING UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY on 06/04/13

2þg 2g
The corresponding magnetic force function (hz ¼ ð1=rÞð@f=@rÞ and F = 0 at r ¼ e) is,
  
@p=@z 4 4 4ag1 2 2 g2 ðrgþ2  egþ2 Þ g3 ðrgþ2  egþ2 Þ
Fðr; z; tÞ ¼ aðr  e Þ þ 2 ðr  e Þ þ þ ð37Þ
4ðg 2  4Þ g 2þg 2g
The expression for the wall shear stress is given by,
@Vz
t rz ¼  jr¼R ð38Þ
@r
Using (33), we can find the expression for the wall shear stress in the form,
ð@p=@zÞ h a1 g1 i
t rz ¼ 2 2a0 ðg 2  4ÞR þ þ ga2 ðg2 Rg1 þ g3 Rg1 Þ ð39Þ
g 4 R
where
     
Rm R 2 2 2 1 2a Re RS2 2a Re RS2 Re RS2
a¼ ; g ¼ S Re Rm R ; a0 ¼ 1 2 ; a1 ¼ 1 ; a2 ¼ 
2 4 g 4 g2 g2
and the coefficients gi(z) (i = 1,2,3,4) are given by,
g 2 ½ðg 2  4ÞðR2  e2 ÞðRg þ eg Þao  aðR2 þ e2 ÞðRg  eg Þa2 
For personal use only.

g1 ¼

g 2 ðRg þ eg Þ log Re a1  4aðRg  eg Þa2


g2 ¼ a ðR2  e2 ÞðRg  eg Þ½2ðg 2  4Þao þ 2aa2   g 2 ðRgþ2  egþ2 Þ log Re a1


ðRg  eg Þ g 2 ðRg þ eg Þ log Re a1  4aðRg  eg Þa2


g3 ¼ ðReÞg a ðR2  e2 ÞðRg  eg Þ½2ðg 2  4Þao  2aa2  þ g 2 ðR2 eg  Rg e2 Þlog Re a1


ðRg  eg Þ g 2 ðRg þ eg Þlog Re a1  4aðRg  eg Þa2

1
g4 ¼
 
ðRg  eg Þ g 2 ðRg þ eg Þlog Re a1  4aðRg  eg Þa2
   e2  
2 g g 2 g g R 2 2 g g
 ðg  4ÞðR  e Þa0 g ðR þ e Þlog R2 a1  2aðR þ e ÞðR  e Þa2
e
  2 2 2 2

þ aa2 g 2 log ½Re eR ðR2g þ e2g Þ  2ðReÞg log ½RR ee  a1 þ 2aðR2  e2 ÞðR2g  e2g Þa2 ð40Þ

We can find the flux between the coaxial tubes Q using,


ZR  
@p 1
Q ¼ 2p rVz dr ¼  ð41Þ
@z FðzÞ
e
and
2ðg 2  4Þ
FðzÞ ¼ ð42Þ
p½c1 g1 þ c2 g2 þ c3 g3 þ c4 g4 þ c5 
where the constants ci(z) (i = 1, 2, 3, 4) are given by,
2
!
RR 2 2 4a2 ðRgþ2  egþ2 Þ
c1 ¼ 2a1 log 2  a1 ðR  e Þ; c 2 ¼
ee 2þg
4a2 ðRgþ2  egþ2 Þ
c3 ¼ ; c4 ¼ 2ðR2  e2 Þ; c5 ¼ ao ðg 2  4ÞðR4  e4 Þ ð43Þ
2g

Published by NRC Research Press


Mekheimer et al. 207

Since Q is constant for all sections between the two coaxial tubes, the pressure drop across the length of the overlapping
stenosis is,
ZL   ZL
@p
Dp ¼  dz ¼ Q FðzÞ dz ð44Þ
Can. J. Phys. Downloaded from www.nrcresearchpress.com by NANJING UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY on 06/04/13

@z
0 0

The resistance to flow (resistance impedance) experienced by the flowing blood in the arterial segment under consideration,
using (44), may be defined as
2  3
d þ32
Zd Z ZL
Dp 6 7
l¼ ¼ 4 IðzÞdzþ FðzÞdzþ IðzÞdz5 ð45Þ
Q
0 d d  þ32

where IðzÞ ¼ FðzÞjR¼ðm zþ1ÞUðtÞ .

4. Discussion of the results tal tethering K, and the degree of anisotropy of the vessel
wall n. The easiest way of understanding this is the presence
To observe the quantitative effects of the Hartmann num- of fibres (collagen, elastine, and smooth muscle cells
ber Ha, the magnetic Reynolds number Rm, the taper angle (SMCs)) in the wall, where the behavior in the direction of
f, the maximum height of stenosis d, the radius ratio e, the the fibres will be different than in the direction transverse to
degree of anisotropy of the vessel wall n, and the contribu- the fibres. On the other hand, if the fibre direction coincides
tions of the elastic constraints to the total tethering K, for with the axial, circumferential, and radial directions of the
the purpose of the computations, we use the following ex- artery, the arterial wall material is called isotropic [20]. We
perimental data [1, 17, 20], take the data that represents a free isotropic tube,
For personal use only.

M Tq ¼ 0; s q ¼ 0:5; n ¼ 1; K¼0
Re ¼ 1; b ¼ 0:1; l0 ¼ 1; S¼ ;
R2e
d ¼ 0:75; k ¼ 0:0021 u ¼ 7:854; Tq ¼ 0:1; where in the case of an isotropic tube sq = 1/2 and n = 1, and
the tube is initially unstressed [23].
s q ¼ 0:51; Eq ¼ 4  106 ; h ¼ 0:01; kr ¼ ReK The effects of elastic wall parameters n and K on the the
axial induced magnetic field hz and the distribution of the
The influence of the parameter that represents viscoelastic
current density Jq are displayed in Fig. 4. We can see that
stress components acting along the circumferential direction
the axial induced magnetic field hz increases with an in-
Tq on propagation properties was previously analyzed by
crease the anisotropy parameter n and the contribution due
Atabek and Lew [21]. The effect of the Poisson ratio in the
to elastic constraints of the total tethering K. Further in the
circumferential direction sq and the effect of the contribu- half region, the induced magnetic field is in one direction,
tions of the elastic constraints to the total tethering K was and in the other half it is in the opposite direction. The dis-
investigated by Womersley [22]. tribution of the current density Jq decreases as n and K in-
Figure 2 indicates how the axial induced magnetic field hz crease in the regions 0.5 < r < 0.602 and 0.950 < r < 1.074,
and the axial velocity Vz are influenced by Ha and Rm. Fig- while it increases for the same values of Ha and Rm in the
ure 2a indicates that the magnitude of the axial induced region 0.602 < r < 0.950.
magnetic field hz decreases as Ha increases, while it in- Figure 5 shows the variation of the the axial induced
creases as Rm increases. Further in the half region, hz is in magnetic field hz and the distribution of the current density
one direction and in the other half it is in the opposite direc- Jq for several values of e and d. It is observed that hz de-
tion, and it is zero at r = 0.5, 0.79, 1.073. Also, the axial in- creases with increasing d and e in the half region and the in-
duced magnetic field profiles are almost parabolic in the verse result is observed in the other half. Also, the
regions 0.5 < r < 0.79 and 0.79 < r < 1.073. Figure 2b shows distribution of the current density Jq increases as d and e in-
that the axial velocity Vz decreases as Ha and Rm increase. crease in the regions 0.5 < r < 0.602, 0.55 < r < 0.645, and
Figure 3 describes the distribution of the current density 0.6 < r < 0.689, while it decreases for the same values of d
Jq with r for different values of Ha and Rm. The graphical and e in the regions 0.602 < r < 0.950, 0.645 < r < 0.960, and
results of these figures indicate that the dimensionless cur- 0.689 < r < 0.971, and the inverse result is observed in the re-
rent density Jq increases as Ha and Rm increase in the re- gions 0.950 < r < 1.074, 0.960 < r < 1.049, 0.971 < r < 1.023).
gions 0.5 < r < 0.606 and 0.943 < r < 1.073, while it decreases The effects on the blood flow characteristics of vessel ta-
for the same values of Ha and Rm in the region pering together with the shape of stenosis seem to be
0.606 < r < 0.943. equally important and hence deserve special attention. The
Propagation properties of blood flow depend on the influ- tapering is a significant aspect of a mammalian arterial sys-
ence of the elastic wall parameters, which represent viscoe- tem. Thus, in this paper, we are interested in the flow
lastic stress component acting along the circumferential through a tapered artery with stenosis. In an actual situation,
direction Tq, the Poisson ratio in the circumferential direc- the arterial wall thickness does not have uniform shape, so
tion sq, the contributions of the elastic constraints to the to- we will show the influence of the diverging, converging,

Published by NRC Research Press


208 Can. J. Phys. Vol. 89, 2011

Fig. 2. Variation of axial induced magnetic field (a) hz and (b) axial velocity Vz with r for different values of Ha and Rm at t = 0.5, z = 1.5,
d = 0.05, e = 0.5, f = 0, n = 1, K = 104.
Can. J. Phys. Downloaded from www.nrcresearchpress.com by NANJING UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY on 06/04/13

Fig. 3. Variation of the current denisty distribution Jq with r for different values of (a)Ha and (b)Rm at t = 0.5, z = 1.5, d = 0.05, e = 0.5, f = 0,
n = 1, K = 104.
For personal use only.

Fig. 4. Variation of (a) axial induced magnetic field hz and (b) current denisty distribusion Jq with r for different values of n and K at t = 0.5,
z = 1.5, d = 0.05, e = 0.5, f = 0, n = 1, Ha = 5, Rm = 1.

Published by NRC Research Press


Mekheimer et al. 209

Fig. 5. Variation of (a) axial induced magnetic field hz and (b) current denisty distribusion Jq with r for different values of d and e at t = 0.5,
z = 1.5, n = 1, K = 104, f = 0, Ha = 5, Rm = 1.
Can. J. Phys. Downloaded from www.nrcresearchpress.com by NANJING UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY on 06/04/13

Fig. 6. Variation of the wall shear stress distribusion trz with (a) z and (b) t for different values of f at d = 0.05, e = 0.5, K = 104, n = 1,
Ha = 2, Rm = 1.
For personal use only.

and nontapering arterial walls on the resistance to flow (re- curves, shown in Fig. 6a, have been measured showing the
sistance impedance) and the wall shear stress. The analysis effects of vessel tapering of the wall shear stress profiles.
of blood flow through tapered tubes is very important in Under stenotic conditions, the curves through the converging
understanding the behaviour of the flow, as the taper of the tapered artery (f = –0.1, –0.15, –0.2 (<0)) is less than those
tube is an important factor in pressure development. It has in the nontapered artery (f = 0) and the divergent tapered ar-
been pointed out that the blood vessels bifurcate at frequent tery (f = 0.1, 0.15, 0.21 (>0)). Hence, we can conclude that
intervals, and although the individual segments of arteries the wall shear stress is reduced to some extent with vessel
may be treated as uniform between bifurcations, the diame- tapering, then it increases at z = 2.25. Figure 6b shows plots
ter of the artery decreases quite fast at each bifurcation [24]. for the wall shear stress versus time for nearly four cardiac
It has been observed that even for small angles of taper (up cycles. We can observe that divergent tapering gives higher
to 28), the effects of tapering of the blood vessels cannot be values compared with both the convergent tapering and non-
neglected [25]. As pointed out by How and Black [26], this tapered artery. Figure 6a shows the profiles for the wall
is also very useful for the design of prosthetic blood vessels, shear stress in a stenosed artery with seven different taper
as the use of grafts of tapered lumen has the advantage of angles. The wall shear stress for divergent tapering (f = 0.1,
surgical benefits, the blood vessels being wider upstream. 0.15, 0.2 (>0)) gives higher values than both the convergent
The wall shear stress is important in understanding the de- tapering (f = –0.1, –0.15, –0.2 (<0)) and the nontapered ar-
velopment of arterial disease because of the strong correla- tery (f = 0).
tion between the localization of arteriosclerosis (stenosis) Figure 7a illustrates the variation of the resistance to flow
and arterial wall. Figure 6a shows the wall shear stress dis- (resistance impedance) with the maximum height of stenosis
tribution over the tapering arterial segment with overlapping d for different values of tapering angle f. It shows that the
stenosis at a particular instant of time t = 0.5. Seven different values of resistance are higher for convergent tapering artery

Published by NRC Research Press


210 Can. J. Phys. Vol. 89, 2011

Fig. 7. Variation of the resistance impedance (resistance to flow) l with (a) z and (b)t for different values of f at e = 0.5, K = 104, n = 1,
Ha = 2, Rm = 1, L = 3.
Can. J. Phys. Downloaded from www.nrcresearchpress.com by NANJING UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY on 06/04/13

Fig. 8. Plot showing streamlines fot different values of (a) taper angle f and (b) maximum height of stenosis d.
For personal use only.

(f = –0.01, –0.015, –0.02 (<0)) than for both the divergent lus is defined as a volume of fluid bounded by a closed
tapering artery (f = 0.01, 0.015, 0.02 (>0)) and nontapered streamlines in the wave frame that is transported with the
artery (f = 0). Figure 7b is a plot of the resistance to flow wave. To see the effects of the taper angle f and the maxi-
versus time for nearly four cardiac cycles to show that the mum height of stenosis d on trapping, we prepared Fig. 8 for
resistance to flow shows the opposite trend of the wall shear various values of the parameters: f = 0, 0.1, –0.1 with
stress. The values of resistance are higher for a convergent t = 0.5, d = 0.05, n = 1, K = 0, Ha = 5, Rm = 1, and d = 0.05,
tapering artery (f = –0.01, –0.015, –0.02 (<0)) than for 0.07, 0.09 with t = 0.5, f = 0, n = 1, K = 0, Ha = 5, Rm = 1.
both the divergent tapering artery (f = 0.01, 0.015, 0.02 Figure 8 reveals that the size of the trapping bolus increases
(>0)) and nontapered artery (f = 0). Hence we can conclude toward the left at f = 0.1 (divergent tapering artery), and it
that more blood can flow freely through a diverging vessel, increases toward the right at f = –0.1 (convergent tapering
which has less resistance. artery). Furthermore, the trapping boluses disappear at f = 0
Trapping represents an interesting phenomenon for fluid (nontapered artery). The effect of the the maximum height
flow. In the wave frame, streamlines under certain condi- of stenosis d on the trapping is also illustrated in Fig. 8. It
tions split to trap a bolus, which moves as a whole with the is observed that there is no separation of flow, and the flow
speed of the wave. The formation of an internally circulating is laminar at d = 0.05, but that separation occurs and the
bolus of fluid by closed streamline is called trapping. A bo- streamlines seem turbulent at d = 0.07 and d = 0.09. The ef-

Published by NRC Research Press


Mekheimer et al. 211

Fig. 9. Plot showing magnetic force lines for different values of (a) Ha and (b) Rm.
Can. J. Phys. Downloaded from www.nrcresearchpress.com by NANJING UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY on 06/04/13

Fig. 10. Plot showing (a) magnetic force lines and (b) streamlines for free and tethered tubes.
For personal use only.

fect of Ha and Rm on magnetic force function is illustrated 6. Concluding remarks


in Fig. 9. It is observed that as Ha and Rm increase, the
magnetic force lines have a tendency to move away from The effect of the induced magnetic field on blood flow
the inner tube. Also, the size of the boluses increase with in- through an anisotropically tapered elastic artery with over-
creasing Ha and Rm and slowly disappears for small values lapping stenosis in an annulus is studied. The exact expres-
of Ha and Rm, where the fluid moves as a bulk. Finally, the sions for streamlines, magnetic force function, axial
effect of the degree of anisotropy of the vessel wall n and velocity, axial induced magnetic field, and current density
the contributions of the elastic constraints to the total tether- are obtained analytically. Graphical results are presented for
ing K for free and tethered tubes on the magnetic force func- the wall shear stress distributions, resistance impedance, ax-
tion and the streamlines are illustrated in Figs. 10a and 10b, ial induced magnetic field, current density, and trapping.
such that the size of the boluses in the free tube (n = 1, The medical term ‘‘stenosis’’ means a narrowing of any
K = 0) are smaller than in the tethered tube (n = 0.63, body passage (tube or orifice). Stenosis or arteriosclerosis
K = 1.6  104). represents the abnormal and unnatural growth in the arterial

Published by NRC Research Press


212 Can. J. Phys. Vol. 89, 2011

wall thickness that develops at various locations of the car- 5. H.L. Agrawal and B. Anwaruddin. Ranchi Univ. Math. J. 15,
diovascular system under diseased conditions. It is believed 111 (1984).
that stenoses are caused by the impingement of extra vascu- 6. N.T.M. Eldabe, M.F. El-Sayed, A.Y. Ghaly, and H.M.
lar masses or intravascular atherosclerotic plaques, which Sayed. Physica A, 383, 253 (2007). doi:10.1016/j.physa.
2007.05.027.
Can. J. Phys. Downloaded from www.nrcresearchpress.com by NANJING UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY on 06/04/13

develop at the wall of the artery and protrude into the lu-
men. Much research about arteriosclerotic development are 7. Kh.S. Mekheimer. Phys. Lett. A, 372, 4271 (2008). doi:10.
mainly concerned with the single symmetric and nonsym- 1016/j.physleta.2008.03.059.
metric stenoses. Stenoses may develop in series (multiple 8. Kh.S. Mekheimer. J. Appl. Math. 2008, 1 (2008). doi:10.
1155/2008/570825.
stenoses) or may be of irregular shapes or overlapping or of
9. Kh. Mekheimer and M.A. Elkot. Int. J. Pure App. Math. 4,
composite in nature (Nichols and Orourke [27], Lighthill
393 (2007).
[28], Kapur [29], Berger and Jou [30]]. 10. Kh.S. Mekheimer and M.A. El Kot. App. Math. Mech. -.
The main findings can be summarized as follows. Engl. Educ. 29, 1093 (2008). doi:10.1007/s10483-008-0813-
Across the annulus, the axial induced magnetic field hz x.
and the distribution of the current density Jq increase as 11. Kh.S. Mekheimer and M.A. El Kot. Acta Mech. Sin. 24, 637
Ha increases, and by increasing Rm, the axial induced (2008). doi:10.1007/s10409-008-0185-7.
magnetic field hz decreases while the current density Jq 12. Kh.S. Mekheimer and M.A. El Kot. Chem. Eng. Commun.
increases. These results agree closely with those of Me- 197, 1195 (2010). doi:10.1080/00986440903574883.
kheimer [7, 8]. 13. S. Chakravarty and P.K. Mandal. Math. Comput. Model. 24,
43 (1996). doi:10.1016/0895-7177(96)00079-9.
The axial induced magnetic field hz and the distribution 14. S. Chakravarty and P.K. Mandal. Int. J. Non-linear Mech.
of the current density Jq decrease with increasing the de- 35, 779 (2000). doi:10.1016/S0020-7462(99)00059-1.
gree of anisotropy of the vessel wall n and the contribu- 15. Z. Ismail, I. Abdullah, N. Mustapha, and N. Amin. Appl.
tion elastic constraints of the total tethering K. Math. Comput. 195, 669 (2008). doi:10.1016/j.amc.2007.05.
The effect of vessel tapering is an important factor con- 014.
sidered in this paper. The results considered three differ- 16. S. Chakravarty, A. Datta, and P.K. Mandal. Int. J. Eng. Sci.
ent taper angles of artery, convergent tapering (f < 0), 33, 1821 (1995). doi:10.1016/0020-7225(95)00022-P.
nontapered (f = 0), and divergent tapering (f > 0) in the 17. S. Chakravarty. Rheol. Acta, 26, 200 (1987). doi:10.1007/
For personal use only.

presence of overlapping stenosis. The variation of resis- BF01331978.


tance to flow with time gives the opposite trend of the 18. H.B. Atabek and H.S. Lew. Biophys. J. 6, 481 (1966).
wall shear stress with respect to the taper angle f, and doi:10.1016/S0006-3495(66)86671-7.
these results agree closely with those of Chakravarty et 19. D.F. Young. J. Eng. Ind. 90, 248 (1968).
al. [31], Mandal et al. [32], and Ismail et al. [15]. 20. P. Kalita and R. Schaefer. Arch. Comput. Methods Eng. 15,
The size of trapped boluses increase toward the left at 1 (2008). doi:10.1007/s11831-007-9015-5.
21. H.B. Atabek and H.S. Lew. Biophys. J. 6, 481 (1966).
f = 0.1 (divergent tapering artery) and increase toward
doi:10.1016/S0006-3495(66)86671-7.
the right at f = –0.1 (convergent tapering artery). Further,
22. J.R. Womersley. An Elastic Tube Theory of Pulse Transmis-
the trapped boluses disappear at f = 0 (nontapered artery). sion and Oscillatory Flow in Mammalian Arteries. Wright
In the overlapping stenotic region, when increasing the Air Development Center Technical Report TR-1957, 56–
maximum height of the stenosis d, the streamlines sepa- 6114. Wright-Patterson AFB, Ohio.
rate and trapped boluses appear. 23. H.B. Atabek. Biophys. J. 8, 626 (1968). doi:10.1016/S0006-
The magnetic force lines have a tendency to move away 3495(68)86512-9.
from the inner tube when increasing Ha and Rm. Also, 24. A.P. Dwivedi, T.S. Pal, and L. Rakesh. Indian J. Technol.
the size of the boluses increases with increasing Ha and 20, 295 (1982).
Rm and slowly disappear for the small values of Ha and 25. P. Chaturani and R. Pralhad. Biorheology, 22, 303 (1985).
Rm, where the fluid moves as a bulk. These results agree 26. T.V. How and R.A. Black. Biorheology, 24, 337 (1987).
closely with those of Mekheimer [7, 8]. 27. W.W. Nichols and M.F. Orourke. McDonald’s blood flow in
It is observed that the size of trapped boluses for the arteries, USA. Oxford University Press, Inc., New York.
magnetic force lines in the free isotropic tube is smaller 1973.
than those in the tethered tube. 28. S.J. Lighthill. Mathematical biofluid dynamics, Univeristy of
Cambridge - Society for industrial and applied mathematics.
1975.
References 29. J.N. Kapur. Mathematical models in biology and medicine.
1. S. Chakravarty and A. Ghosh Chowdhury. Rheol. Acta, 27, India-Rajkamal Electric Press, New Delhi. 1985.
418 (1988). doi:10.1007/BF01332163. 30. S.A. Berger and L.D. Jou. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 32, 347
2. V.I. Vishnyakov and K.B. Pavlov. Magnitnaya Gidrodina- (2000). doi:10.1146/annurev.fluid.32.1.347.
mika, 8, 174 (1972). 31. S. Chakravarty, Sarifuddin, and P.K. Mandal. Comput.
3. V.K. Sud, G.S. Sekhon, and R.K. Mishra. Bull. Math. Biol. Methods Appl. Math. 4, 391 (2004).
39, 385 (1977). 32. P.K. Mandal, S. Chakravarty, A. Mandal, and N. Amin.
4. L.M. Srivastava and R.P. Agarwal. J. Appl. Mech. 47, 196 Appl. Math. Comput. 189, 766 (2007). doi:10.1016/j.amc.
(1980). doi:10.1115/1.3153605. 2006.11.139.

Published by NRC Research Press

You might also like