Professional Documents
Culture Documents
WIRATAMA KOTAGAJAH
1439 H/2018 M
AN UNDERGRADUATE THESIS
By:
SRI WAHYU SETYA NINGSIH
Student ID: 13108487
ii
iii
iv
v
vi
THE USE OF STORY COMPLETION TECHNIQUE TO IMPROVE
SPEAKING ABILITY AMONG THE TENTH GRADE OF SMK WIRATAMA
KOTAGAJAH
ABSTRACK
BY:
SRI WAHYU SETYA NINGSIH
The purpose of this research to show that speaking ability and finding the
improving speaking ability by using story completion technique of SMK to
Wiratama Kotagajah. The students have bad speaking, the students are not able
express their idea, The students have difficulties to speak and pronounce English
word and the students are often embarrassed if they make mistakes in speaking so
they are afraid to practice. Therefore, to immprove their speaking ability, the
researcher used story completion technique in learning process to solve the
problem.
In this research, the researcher conducts classroom action research which
is done in two cycles. Each cycle consist of planning, acting, observing and
reflecting. The subject of this research is 20 students in class. In collecting data,
the researcher used test ( pre-test, post test I and post test II and Observation and
documentation. The research is conducted collaboratively with English teacher of
SMK Wiratama Kotagajah.
The result of this research shows that story completion as technique can be
used as a teaching technique of speaking. It provided by the average mark result
of pre-test and post test show that there were improved mark. At post test I is 65
and post test II is 72, it improve 7 points. Based on the result above, it can be said
that story completion technique can improve speaking ability. This technique
makes the students are interested and motivated in the class. So that, they are
confidence to speak English in the class.
vii
PENGGUNAAN TEKNIK CERITA PENYELESAIAN UNTUK
MENINGKATKAN KEMAMPUAN BERBICARA SISWA KELAS X DI SMK
WIRATAMA KOTAGAJAH
ABSTRAK
OLEH:
SRI WAHYU SETYA NINGSIH
viii
ix
x
DADICATION PAGE
My beloved Mom, you are my hero in my life. Thank you so much for all.
xi
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
Praise to Allah SWT, God the Almighty for giving great blessing and
Muhammad SAW, the one whom I admire most as the true leader for his
followers and who had delivered the truth to human beings in general and muslim
in particular.
Recount Text by Using Peer review Technique among the Eighth Grade of SMP
accomplished without any helps and suppports from many helpful individuals. In
this lovely chance, the researcher would like to sincerely acknowledgement her
gratitude.
The researcher can not stand alone, there were many persons who
that researcher could not mention one by one, her big thanks to:
Departement.
xii
6. Abdul Aziz Nabawi, S.Pd as the English Teacher of SMK Wiratama
Finally the researcher welcomes any suggestion and critic for the
The Writer,
xiii
TABLE OF CONTENTS
COVER ........................................................................................................... i
TITTLE ........................................................................................................... ii
ABSTACT ....................................................................................................... iii
NOTA DINAS ................................................................................................. iv
APPROVAL PAGE ....................................................................................... v
RATIFICATION PAGE ................................................................................ vi
STATEMANT OF R ESEARCH ORIGINALITY ..................................... vii
MOTTO .......................................................................................................... viii
DEDICATION PAGE .................................................................................... ix
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT ............................................................................. x
TABLE OF CONTENT ................................................................................. xi
LIST OF TABLES ......................................................................................... xii
LIST OF FIGURES ....................................................................................... xiv
LIST OF APPENDIX .................................................................................... xv
CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION ................................................................. 1
xiv
2. Elements of Speaking Ability .................................. 8
xv
e. The Building of SMK Wiratama Kotagajah...................... 34
f. The Sketch Location of SMK Wiratama Kotagajah ........ 36
B. Description of The Research Result ......................................... 36
1. Cycle I .................................................................................. 38
2. Cycle II ................................................................................. 47
C. Discussion .................................................................................. 55
1. The Result of Cycle I ............................................................. 55
2. The Result of Cycle II ........................................................... 56
CHAPTER V CONCLUSION AND SUGGESTION ................................. 57
A. Conclusion ............................................................................... 57
B. Suggestion ............................................................................... 58
BIBLIOGRAPHY
APPENDIXES
CURRICULLUM VITAE
xvi
LIST OF TABLE
Table Page
Table 1 The Result of Students’ Speaking Narrative Text Pre-Survey at
the Tenth Grade of SMK Wiratama Kotagajah ...................................... 3
Table 2 The List of the Teacher and Staff............................................................. 31
Table 3 The Number of students of SMK Wiratama Kotagajah ........................... 33
Table 4 The Building of SMK Wiratama Kotagajah ............................................ 35
Table 5 The Pre-test Result of Students’ Speaking Ability Class X AK .............. 37
Table 6 The Percentage of Students’ Speaking Ability Pre-test Score ................. 38
Table 7 The Students’ Post-test I Result of Speaking Ability in Cycle I.............. 40
Table 8 The Presentage Students’ Score of Post-test I of Speaking Ability ......... 41
Table 9 The Students’ Activities Result in Cycle I ............................................... 42
Table 10 The Result of Students’ Pre-test and Post-test I..................................... 44
Table 11 The Students’ Score of Speaking Ability Post-test in Cycle II .............. 47
Table 12 The Precentage of Post-test in Cycle II.................................................. 48
Table 13 The Students’ Activities Result in Cycle II ........................................... 49
Table 14 The Result of The Activities in Cycle II ................................................ 50
Table 15 The Result of Students’ Post-test I and Post-test II ............................... 51
Table 16 The Result of Students’ Pre-test, Post-test I and Post-test II ................. 52
Table 17 The Percentage of Students’ Result Post-test I and Post-test II ............. 54
xvii
LIST OF FIGURE
Figure Page
Figure 1 The Sketch Location SMK Wiratama Kotagajah ................................... 36
Figure 2 The Students’ Complete and Incomplete Score on Pre-test and
Post test 1 ................................................................................................ 45
Figure 3 The Students’ Complete and Incomplete Score on Post –test I
and Post-test II ........................................................................................ 52
Figure 4 The Students’ Comple and Incomplete Score on Pe-test, Post-test I
And Post-test II ....................................................................................... 53
xviii
CHAPTER I
INTRODUCTION
people in the word and in many areas of everyday life. Therefore, using
English is the easiest way to communicate with people from other countries
about many aspects in human life such as tecnology, economy, social, and
Junior High School, Senior High School, and University, but also in
The students have limited time to learn English in class, and they still
order to get familiar with English. These cases bring a problem that make
subject the students have to understand and tell some short functional texts
such as narrative text. In fact, many students at Senior High School especially
The first is the environment that does not support the students to speak
English frequently. The environment here means the people outside the class.
These people may think that the students just want to show off when they
2
speak English for daily conversation. The response that the students get makes
them loose their self-confidence to improve their speaking. Since the students
do not want to be rejected by the people around them, they use their native
communicate in English fluently outside the class. The second is the students
English word and many students have low motivation in learning English
The next cause is the problem on how the teacher presents the materials. It
is found that there are several teachers who are still unable to create a life-class
English.
To cope with the problems, the teacher should find the technique to teach
learners will easily be plunged into the plots of the story as they had to tell the
part of the story decided. They can use their gesture as the expression when
Wiratama Kotagajah, by using the test for knowing the score in speaking, the
reseacher got the result of the test and can be seen on the following table :
Table 1
The result of students’ Speaking Narrative text pre-survey score at the tenth grade
of SMK Wiratama Kotagajah
No Name Score Categories
1 DZF 70 Complete
2 DS 60 Incomplete
3 DAP 55 Incomplete
4 DPS 67 Incomplete
5 IPA 55 Inccomplete
6 LS 50 Incomplete
7 MCN 60 Incomplete
8 MA 67 Incomplete
9 MR 50 Incomplete
10 NN 57 Incomplete
11 NP 60 Incomplete
12 OTK 80 Complete
13 RW 50 Incomplete
14 RAP 50 Incomplete
15 RAP 63 Incomplete
16 SP 65 Incomplete
17 SA 70 Complete
18 SA 53 Incomplete
19 YM 55 Incomplete
20 YA 60 Incomplete
From the The result of pre-survey of speaking ability at the tenth grade of
Total 20 100%
Based on the table above, it can be seen that student’s speaking score are
categorized into low level, there are 3 students that have good score, 6
students that have enough score, and 11 students that have poor score. From
English.
B. Problem Identification
frequently.
C. Problem Limitation
D. Problem Formulation
above, the researcher formulates the problem as follow : “can the Use of
1. Objective of Study
Wiratama Kotagajah.
information to the teacher about the method that can be used to teach
ability.
THEORICAL REVIEW
1
Nunan david. Language teaching methodology “ a text book for teachers”. 1991,
Macquarie University. P. 39.
2
Hornby, A S, Oxford Advanced Learners Dictionary, Eighth edition. 2010, New York:
Oxford University Express. p. 1428
3
Harmer, Jeremy, The Practice of English Language Teaching, (Third Edition, Longman:
Pearson, 2001), p.269.
8
listener where the speaker try to give the information and the listeners try to
language features, but also the ability to process the information and
language.
are:4
a. Language Feature
1) Connected Speech
added.
2) Expressive Devised
4
Harmer, Jeremy, The Practice of English Language Teaching, (Third Edition, Longman:
Pearson, 2001), p.269-271.
9
4) Negotiation Language
1) Language Processing
when we are saying and social processing that we can see from when
there are several language experts have attempted categories the function
performance.
a. Talk as Interactions
meet then they exchange greeting, then engage in a small talk, or retell
b. Talk as Transaction
where the focus is on what is said or done. The message and making
than the participants and how they interact socially with each other”.
c. Talk as Performance
This refers to public talk. Here, the speaker transfer the information
dialog.
their English course on the basis how much they have improved in their
knowledge.
knowledge base.
6
Ibid, p. 19
12
language use. For that purpose they need a range of speaking tasks that
made available for use in regular speaking practice in the classroom and
beyond.
7
Magdalena Aleksandrzak, Problems and Challenges in Teaching and Learning Speaking
at Advanced Level, (Glottodidactica: Adam Mickiewiez University Press Prozan, 2011), p, 43-44
13
first language into the second. Even extensive knowledge of the target
discourse.
defined as follows:
number of the students in the group. Moreover, every learner enters any
learners who often have a good insight into the nature of their
the teacher should make a some group in classrroom to take easy when
has been assessed in many fields. in many fields. For example, with the
research has been conducted into task effects on speaking ability in second
8
Ibid, p. 38-39.
15
language acquisition (SLA) field. 9Speaking ability has been the focus not
only in SLA research, but also in language testing and in other research
areas dealing with language use. Regardless of the area of study, two
methods are often used in assessing speaking abiliy: the use of rating
scales and of speaking ability measures, the latter of which is dealt with in
objectives.
Table 2.
The Measurements of Speaking Ability
No Aspect Criteria
9
Rie Koizumi, “speaking performance measures”, (Japan: JABAET), Edition
9/ 2005, P. 2
10
Noriko Iwashita et.all, “Assessed Levels of Second Language Speaking
Proficiency” Applied Linguistics, (Abu Dabi: Oxford University Press) 29/1: 2008, p.4
16
others).
mispronounced word.
enjoyable in whole class. The learners will easily be plunged into the plots
of the story as they had to tell the part of the story decided. They can use
their gesture as the expression when they are telling a story. Therefore, it
text.11
class which can make the students interested in following the lesson.12
activity.
as:13
11
Kayi. H, Teaching Speaking: Activities to Promote Speaking in a Second Language,
(International journal of English and Educational, 2014), Vol. III, Issue. 3, p. 6.
12
O’Malley, J. Michael and Lorraine Valdez Pierce, Authentic Assessment for English
Language Learners, (International journal of English and Educational, 2014), Vol. III, Issue. 3, p.
8
13
Ibid, p.7.
18
skill.
previously told by the speaker based on the part given by the teacher.
Before that, the teacher should begin the story that must be completed
student is motivated to speak, ignoring the error that they will make
later on.
activity for which students sit in a circle. For this activity, a teacher
starts to tell a story, but after a few sentences he or she stops narrating.
Then, each student starts to narrate from the point where the previous
one stopped.
14
Ibid, p.6
19
teacher telling about few sentences then one by one student continue the
story. Students start from the point one that the previous one stopped.
Every student free to tell their idea about the story, so that everybody
will be very enjoying speaking. Students free to think about the part of
the story, such as what conflict of the story, climax until resolution and
the last students free to think about the resolution of the story, so the
C. Action Hypothesis
Action hypothesis which is submitted in this research is “ by using
Wiratama Kotagajah.
CHAPTER III
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
A. Research Setting
B. Research Subject
C. Research Procedure
This research uses a classroom action research. There are four components
15
David Hopkins, A teacher’s Guide to Classroom Research 4th edition, (New York :
McGraw Hill Open University Press,2011).
22
reflecting.16
CYCLE I CYCLE II
Revised
This classroom action research is arranged into two cycles. They are cycle
one and cycle two. The researcher will collaborate with the speaking
lecturer who teaches in class X AK. The activities that will be done in
1. Pre-cycle
At the first meeting of the research, the researcher gave a pre test to
the students. Pre cycle test was conducted before the researcher gave
16
Anne Burns, Doing Action Research in English Language Teaching: A Guide for
Practitioners, (New York : Routledge, 2010) , p. 9
23
student’s basic skill of speaking narrative text before giving them the
treatment. This test asked students to tell a narrative text about their
2. Cycle 1
First Cycle test was done in second meeting. In this meeting, the
a. Planning
researcher needs before doing this action research. This plan was
activities:
b. Acting
completion technique.
c. Observing
in the classroom.
this observation will be done together with action that has been
technique.
d. Reflecting
2) The problems in the first cycle that have not been solved will
3. Cycle 2
The researcher did the second cycle after first cycle was done. The
activities in second cycle were similar with the activities in first cycle
before but with some revision after doing reflection in first cycle.
a. Planning
b. Acting
this phase, the researcher also conducted the post test. The
26
c. Observing
this step was to know whether the result of actions that the
d. Reflecting
after getting data from second cycle test or post test then the
The classroom action research needs the data to support the investigation.
There are several ways to collect data like questionnaire, observation, field
notes, interview, documentation, test, and etc. In this research, the researcher
gathered the data to support above. The researcher chooses some of which are
appropriate to the school environment, and can be done there. The techniques
which are used by the researcher to collect the data are test, observation and
documentation.
1. Test
a. Pre Test
The researcher gives test in the first meeting before the research in
order to know ability of the students before doing the action research.
The pre-test used in this research is in the form of speaking skill test.
b. Post Test
The post tests would be done in the end of every cycle. Test has
17
H. Douglas Brown, Teaching by., p.384
28
could be identified if the average scores of the post test are higher
This step would be done after the treatment to know the use of
2. Observation
In this research, the researcher observed the students behaviors and the
learning will be held. In doing the observation, the research made the
technique.
3. Documentation
The researcher used documents which are taken from the data of
the school such as total of the students, the teachers and the condition
of the school.
E. Research Instrument
make her work becomes easier and to get better result, complete, and
29
could be in form of questionnaire, observation list, test, etc. in this study the
1. Observation
2. Document
The researcher used documents which are taken from the data of
the school such as total of the students, the teachers and the condition of
the school.
3. Test
the student’s speaking skill improvement. The researcher used oral test,
the students tell about narrative text.. With this form, the scoring can be
Data analysis will be conduct by taking the average of the pre test, and
post test. To know students achievements after the actions are conducted and
The formula :
x
x=
n
18
Arikunto Suharsimi, Prosedur Penelitian, Suatu Pendekatan Praktek, (Jakarta: PT.
Rineka Cipta, 2003),p 136
30
x : Mean Score
x : The sum of all scores
X : Raw score
The Percentages :
x X 100%
P =
n
P : Mean Precentages
x : The sum of all score
G. Indicator of Success
The indicators of the successful takes from the process and the result of
the action research. The study is called success if 70% students get score
learning activity.
19
Donald Ary, Intoduction to Research in Educational, p. 108-109
CHAPTER IV
Maijab, BA 1980-1988
Mulyadi 1988-1998
Table 3
The List of the Teacher and Staff
NO NAME POSITION SUBJECT
the eleventh grade consist of 106 students, and the twelevth grade
Table 4
The Number of Students of SMK Wiratama Kotagajah
1. X 42 49 91
2. XI 44 62 106
3. XII 49 51 100
Kotagajah:
Table 5
The Buildings of SMK Wiratama Kotagajah
No Names of Building Total
1. Classroom 12
2. Library 1
3. Headmaster Room 1
35
5. Teacher Room 1
6. Staff Room 1
7. Counselor Room 1
8. Sains Laboratory 1
9. Computer Laboratory 1
15 Mosque 2
16 Kitchen 1
17 Canteen 2
19 Parking Area 2
36
Figure.1
(1-4)
Twelevth grade
clasess
(1- 4)
WC
Teacher’s
parked
Office
tenth grade clases
Mosque
In this research, the researcher conducted the pre-test on oct 25th 2017
before the process of cycle one would be done. The result of the students’
Table 6
The Pre-test Result of Students’ Speaking Ability
Class X AK
No Name Score Note
1 DZF 60 Incomplete
2 DS 50 Incomplete
3 DAP 70 Complete
4 DPS 80 Complete
5 IPA 60 Incomplete
6 LS 70 Complete
7 MCN 65 Incomplete
8 MA 70 Incomplete
9 MR 70 Complete
10 NN 50 Incomplete
11 NP 50 Incomplete
12 OTK 65 Incomplete
13 RW 60 Incomplete
14 RAP 70 Incomplete
15 RAP 45 Incomplete
16 SP 60 Incomplete
17 SA 45 Incomplete
18 SA 60 Incomplete
19 YM 45 Incomplete
20 YA 50 Incomplete
Total 1195
Average 59,75
High Score 80
Low Score 45
Source: The result of Pre-test on Oct 25th 2017
38
Table 7
The Percentage of Students’ Speaking Ability Pre-test Score
Based on the table above, it can be seen that there are only 4 students
1. Cycle I
ability.
speaking ability.
39
1) Planning
process such as: preparing the material, making the instrument that
and the cause of problem at the first and the end of learning activities.
The researcher also planned to give evaluation to measure how far the
2) Acting
The first meeting was conducted on oct 27th 2017 for 2x40
checking the attendace list and asking the students condition. The
this occasion, the researcher gave the exercise to the students. The
students.
in front of the class and aply the story of naarrative text with story
complete category. The result of the students’ test was better than
Table 8
The Students’ Post-test 1 Result of Speaking Ability in Cycle I
4 DPS 80 Complete
5 IPA 60 Incomplete
6 LS 75 Complete
7 MCN 70 Complete
8 MA 75 Complete
9 MR 60 Incomplete
10 NN 60 Incomplete
11 NP 60 Incomplete
12 OTK 70 Complete
13 RW 65 Incomplete
14 RAP 65 Incomplete
15 RAP 50 Incomplete
16 SP 75 Complete
17 SA 55 Incomplete
18 SA 60 Incomplete
19 YM 60 Incomplete
20 YA 60 Incomplete
Total 1305
Average 65.25
High Score 80
Low Score 50
Source: The result of Post-test1 on Nov 01st 2017
Table 9
The Percentage Students’ Score of Post-test of Speaking
Ability
the minimul score 70. The fact showed that the result was
unsatisfactory.
3) Observing
could active to join the learning. Some of them gave attention to the
could speak with story completion technique the material well, but
there were also some students who didn’t active and made condition
students’activity.
Table 10
The Students’ Activities Result in Cycle I
No Criteria of succes in speaking Result
ability First meeting Second meeting
1. Interest to following the class 60 % 80 %
2. Respond the topic 55 % 80 %
anthusiastically
3. Pay attention to teacher 70 % 90 %
explanation
4. Focus on the learning material 70% 85%
5. Practice in front of the class 60 % 100%
6. Brave to act out role 51 % 55 %
7. Brave to give opinion 18 % 20 %
43
meeting.
4) Reflecting
learning process still uncontrolled. Some of the students did not focus
on the material and they were still confused to speak with story
completion technique.
b) The researcher motivated the students to focus on study and did not
make a noises
Table 11
The Result of Students’ Pre-test and Post-test I
Students’ Result
No Name Category
Pre-test Post-test Improve
1 DZF 60 70 10 Increase
2 DS 50 50 0 Constant
3 DAP 70 75 5 Increase
4 DPS 80 80 0 Constant
5 IPA 60 60 0 Constant
6 LS 70 75 5 Increase
7 MCN 65 70 5 Increase
8 MA 70 75 5 Increase
9 MR 70 60 -10 Decrease
10 NN 50 60 10 Increase
11 NP 50 60 10 Increase
12 OTK 65 70 5 Increase
13 RW 60 65 5 Increase
14 RAP 70 65 -5 Decrease
15 RAP 45 50 10 Increase
16 SP 60 75 5 Increase
17 SA 45 55 15 Increase
18 SA 60 60 0 Constant
19 YM 45 60 15 Increase
20 YA 50 60 10 Increase
Total 1195 1305
Average 59.75 65.25
Source:The result of pre test and post test I
45
Figure 2
The Students’ Complete and Incomplete Score on Pre-test and Post test I
66
64
62
60
58 64.25
56
54 59.75
52
Pre test Post test 1
criteria 70. The table of post test 1 shows that there are 8 students who
means that the indicator of succes was not achieved yet, although
2. Cycle II
a. Planning
In this step, the researcher made the lesson plan . Based on the
that the students feel difficult to speak english well because the students
continue the cycle II. The researcher planned to give them more
teacher was active enough in cycle 1, but in the cycle 2 the students were
b. Acting
expression. If there was a word that they felt difficult to simulated it,
the teacher showed the example of narrative text. Next, the researcher
The researcher gave each group a story. It was about naraative text.
47
forward to the class to speak about narrative text in front of the class,.
occassion, the researcher gave the story about narrative text, and the
must do it with things which can support ther actand situation. After
Table 12
The Students’ Score of Speaking AbilityPost-test in Cycle II
No Name Score Note
1 DZF 75 Complete
2 DS 70 Complete
3 DAP 85 Complete
4 DPS 90 Complete
5 IPA 65 Incomplete
6 LS 80 Complete
7 MCN 75 Complete
8 MA 80 Incomplete
9 MR 70 Complete
10 NN 70 Complete
11 NP 70 Complete
12 OTK 80 Complete
13 RW 75 Complete
48
14 RAP 70 Complete
15 RAP 60 Incomplete
16 SP 75 Complete
17 SA 65 Incomplete
18 SA 70 Complete
19 YM 60 Incomplete
20 YA 70 Complete
Total 1455
Average 72.73
High Score 90
Low Score 60
Source: The result of Pre-test on Nov 8th 2017
Table 13
The Percentage of Post-test in Cycle II
can be seen that there was an increasing from the mark of post test 1
category in the percentage of 75%, and there are just 5 students who
that there was increasing score from post test 1 and the post test 2 and
c. Observation
Table 14
The Students’ Activities Result In Cycle II
No Criteria of succes in speaking Result
ability First meeting Second meeting
1. Interest to following the class 98 % 100%
2. Respond the topic anthusiastically 85 % 80 %
3. Pay attention to teacher explanation 85% 90 %
4. Focus on the learning material 80% 90%
5. Practice in front of the class 70% 100%
6. Brave to act out role 75 % 88%
7. Brave to give opinion 30 % 45%
8. Encourage to ask the question 50% 54%
9. Able to answer the question 68% 82 %
10. Having increasing the learning 87% 90%
Average 72,8 % 81,9 %
Source: the result of students activities on oct 25th -8th 2017
that the learning process has done well and the students were active in
Table 15
The Result of The Activity in Cycle I & II
process.
d. Reflecting
significant increasing in this cycle. The condition of the class was getting
51
better than before. The students can speak english well.. The students
Table 16
The Result of Students’ Post-test 1 and Post-test 2
Students’ Result
No Name Category
Post test 1 Post test 2 Increase
1 DZF 70 75 5 Increase
2 DS 50 70 20 Increase
3 DAP 75 85 10 Increase
4 DPS 80 90 10 Increase
5 IPA 60 65 5 Increase
6 LS 75 80 5 Increase
7 MCN 70 75 5 Increase
8 MA 75 80 5 Increase
9 MR 60 70 10 Increase
10 NN 60 70 10 Increase
11 NP 60 70 10 Increase
12 OTK 70 80 10 Increase
13 RW 65 75 10 Increase
14 RAP 65 70 5 Increase
15 RAP 50 60 10 Increase
16 SP 75 75 0 Increase
17 SA 55 65 10 Increase
18 SA 60 70 10 Increase
19 YM 60 60 0 Increase
20 YA 60 70 10 Increase
Total 1305 1445
Average 65,25 72,73
Source:The result of post test I and post test II
52
Figure 3
The Students’ Complete And Incomplete Score on Post-test I and
Post-test II
74
72
70
68
66 72.73
64
62
65.25
60
58
Post test I Post test II
2) The Result of Students’ Mark Pre-test, Pos test I and Post test II
test I than pre-test. At the cycle II, the incresing of post test II better
Table 17
The Result of Students’ Pre-test, Post test I and Post test II
No Name Students’ Result Category
Pre test Post test I Post test II
1 DZF 60 70 75 Increase
2 DS 50 50 70 Increase
3 DAP 70 75 85 Increase
4 DPS 80 80 90 Increase
5 IPA 60 60 65 Increase
6 LS 70 75 80 Increase
7 MCN 65 70 75 Increase
8 MA 70 75 80 Increase
9 MR 70 60 70 Increase
53
10 NN 50 60 70 Increase
11 NP 50 60 70 Increase
12 OTK 65 70 80 Increase
13 RW 60 65 75 Increase
14 RAP 70 65 70 Increase
15 RAP 45 50 60 Increase
16 SP 60 75 75 Increase
17 SA 45 55 65 Increase
18 SA 60 60 70 Increase
19 YM 45 60 60 Increase
20 YA 50 60 70 Increase
Total 1195 1305 1455
Average 59,75 65,25 72,73
Source:the Result of pre test, post test I and post test II
Figure 5
The Students’ Complete and Incomplete Score at Pre test,
Post test I and Post Test II
80
70
60
50
40
72.73 Column1
30 65.25
59.75
20
10
0
Pre test Post test I Post test II
Source: The result of pre test, post test I and Post test II
54
increasing from post test I and post test II. The students’ could achieve
the target. Most of students got mark ≥70 in the percentage of 73%
The table showed that the students’ average in the pre test was
59,75, in the post test 1 was 65,25 and in the post test II was 72,73. It
means that there was an incresing on students’ score from pre test to
cycle I and cycle II. The difference between pre test and post test 1 is
5,5 and the difference between post test 1 and post test 2 is 7,48.
Table 18
The Percentage of Students’ Result Post test I and Post test II
No Score Post Test I Post Test II Category
Frequency Percentage Frequency Percentage
1 > 70 9 45% 15 75% Complete
2 < 70 11 55% 5 25% Incomplete
Total 20 100 % 20 100%
Source: The result of post test I and post test II
increasing in post test I and post test II. There is more than 70% students
C. Discussion
The purpose of the pre test is to know about the students performance
in speaking ability before the researcer gives the treatment.from the result of
pre survey, it show that that the students’ have dificulties to answer the test
and they dificult to speak english well. Based on the data of pre test, it can
show that the students’ average in the pre test is 59,75. Beside that, the
highes score is 80, the lowes score is 45. It show that most of the students
have not complete in achiving the minimum mastery criteria 70. Therefore
In this research, from the pre test score it can show that the students
have many dificulties in the learning process. From the pre test the students’
the students’ speaking ability. Based on the data of pre test, it can show that
the students’ average in the pre test is 65,25. The highes score is 80, the
lowes score is 50. In the cycle 1, the researcher give more treatment and
score. In the post test 1 most of the students incomplete in achieving the
material and learning activities. Beside that, 70% of thw students are not yet
56
achieve in the learning process, so it seen that the students still need more
speaking ability.
From the increasing of pre test to the post test cycle 1, it can be seen
that the used of story completion technique can increase the sudents’
speaking ability, but the students score and students’ activities in cycle 1 not
researcher gives more treatment with detail explanation and detile example
in the learning process to the students. The researcer give more instrument
Based on the table 15, it can be seen that there is percentages from
increased. In the cycle 2 there are 15 students can complete the minimum
score and 5 students who incomplete the minimun score. It is mean that by
using story completion technique can increase the students’ speaking ability
Considering from all data gathered in the classroom action research, the
researcher got some conclusions of the research and some suggestions in the
research result.
A. Conclusion
Kotagajah, the result of observation sheet and the students’ activity, the
technique can improve the students’ score, activeness and their interested in
English subject.
Based on the result of students’ average score from pre test is 59,75,
post test 1 is 65,25, post test 2 is 72,73. The data showed that the students’ average
in the pre test is 59,75, in the post test 1 is 65,25 and in the post test II is 72,73. It
means that there is an improvement on students’ score from pre test to cycle I and
cycle II.
The difference between pre test and post test 1 is 5,5 and the difference
between post test 1 and post test 2 is 7,48. Whereas, the difference between pre-test
and post test 2 is 12,98. From the students’ result of test, it can be seen that the
result of test in cycle 2 is higher than pre test and test in cycle 1. It is clear that
58
minimal pair story completion technique can improve the students’ speaking
ability.
B. Suggestions
Referring to the data in the previous chapter and the conclusion, some
1. The Students
They have to practise to speak and pronounce English word often. If they
2. The Teacher
ability.
BLIOGRAPHY
2001.
Burn Anne. Doing Action Research in English Language Teaching: A Guide for
A. Standar Kompetensi
Berbicara
1.1 Mengungkapkan makna dalam teks lisan fungsional pendek yang
berbentuk narrative text, menceritakannya kembali
B. Kompetensi Dasar.
2.2 Mengungkapkan makna dalam teks lisan fungsional pendek resmi dan
tak resmi secara akurat, lancar dan berterima dalam berbagai konteks
kehidupan sehari-hari
D. Tujuan Pembelajaran
Pada akhir pembelajaran siswa dapat :
Mengekspresikan pendapatnya dengan percaya diri.
E. Materi Pokok
Narrative Text:
True Friends
Once upon a time, there were two close friends who were walking through
the forest together. They knew that anything dangerous can happen any time in
the forest. So they promised each other that they would always be together in any
case of danger.
Suddenly, they saw a large bear getting closer toward them. One of them
climbed a nearby tree at once. But unfortunately the other one did not know how
to climb up the tree. So being led by his common sense, he lay down on the
ground breathless and pretended to be a dead man.
The bear came near the one who was lying on the ground. It smelt in his ears,
and slowly left the place because the bears do not want to touch the dead
creatures. After that, the friend on the tree came down and asked his friend that
was on the ground, "Friend, what did the bear whisper into your ears?" The other
friend replied, "Just now the bear advised me not to believe a false friend."
G. Strategi Pembelajaran
Mengetahui,
Collaborator Researcher
A. Standar Kompetensi
Berbicara
1.1 Mengungkapkan makna dalam teks lisan fungsional pendek
yang berbentuk narrative text, menceritakannya kembali
B. Kompetensi Dasar.
Narrative Text:
Snow White
Once upon a time...In earlier times there lived a, who named Snow
White . He lived with his aunt and uncle because his parents died. One day
she heard her uncle and aunt talking about leaving Snow White in the
castle because they wanted to go to America and they did not have enough
money to take Snow White with them. Princess Snow White did not want
her uncle and aunt to do this. So he decided to escape.
The next day he ran away from home when her aunt and uncle were
having breakfast, he fled into the wood. In the wood she felt very tired and
hungry. Then she saw this cottage. She knocked, but no one answered her
so she went inside and fell asleep Meanwhile, seven dwarfs came home
from his work. They get into. There, they found Snow White woke up
from his sleep. He saw the dwarfs. The dwarf said: " What is your name ?
Snow White said, " My name is Snow White. " One dwarf said, " If you
want, you can stay here with us. ' Snow White tells all about her story.
Then daughter snow and the seven dwarves are now living happily ever
after.
F. Metode Pembelajaran/Teknik
KegiatanAwal (10’)
KegiatanInti (70’)
Eksplorasi
Dalam kegiatan eksplorasi guru:
Elaborasi
Dalam kegiatan elaborasi guru:
Konfirmasi
Dalam kegiatan konfirmasi guru:
Memberikan umpan balik pada siswa dengan member penguatan
dalam bentuk lisan pada siswa yang telah dapat menyelesaikan
tugasnya.
Memberi konfirmasi pada hasil pekerjaan yang sudah dikerjakan
oleh siswa melalui sumber buku lain.
Memfasilitasi siswa melakukan refleksi untuk memperoleh
pengalaman belajar yang sudah dilakukan.
Memberikan motivasi kepada siswa yang kurang dan belum biasa
mengikuti dalam kegiatan tersebut.
3 KegiatanAkhir (10’)
H. Sumber/Bahan/Alat
English Book
I. Penilaian
Narrative text..
III. Pedoman Penilaian
Mengikuti rubik penilaian berikut ini :
Jumlah skor maksimal keseluruhan 10 x 1 = 10
Standar penilaian setiap jawaban
Harris’s oral English rating scale frame
No. Criteria Rating Description
Scores
1 Pronunciation 5 Has few traces of foreign
language.
4 Always intelligible, thought one
is conscious of a definite accent.
7 Pronunciation problem
necessities concentrated listening
and occasionally lead to
misunderstanding.
2 Very hard to understand because
of pronunciation problem, most
frequently be asked to repeat.
1 Pronunciation problem to serve
as to make speech virtually
unintelligible.
2 Grammar 5 Make few (if any) noticeable
errors of grammar and word
order.
4 Occasionally makes grammatical
and or word orders errors that do
not, however obscure meaning.
7 Make frequent errors of grammar
and word order, which
occasionally obscure meaning.
2 Grammar and word order errors
make comprehension difficult,
must often rephrases sentence.
1 Errors in grammar and word
order, so, severe as to make
speech virtually unintelligible.
7 Vocabulary 5 Use of vocabulary and idioms is
virtually that of native speaker.
4 Sometimes uses inappropriate
terms and must rephrases ideas
because of lexical and equities.
7 Frequently uses the wrong words
conversation somewhat limited
because of inadequate
vocabulary.
2 Misuse of words and very limited
vocabulary makes
comprehension quite difficult.
1 Vocabulary limitation so extreme
as to make conversation virtually
impossible.
4 Fluency 5 Speech as fluent and efforts less
as that of native speaker.
4 Speed of speech seems to be
slightly affected by language
problem.
7 Speed and fluency are rather
strongly affected by language
problem.
2 Usually hesitant, often farced
into silence by language
limitation.
1 Speech is so halting and
fragmentary as to make
conversation virtually
impossible.
5 Comprehension 5 Appears to understand
everything without difficulty
4 Understand nearly everything at
normal speed although
occasionally repetition may be
necessary
7 Understand most of what is said
at slower than normal speed
without repetition
2 Has great difficulty comprehend.
social conversation spoken
slowly and with frequent
repetition
1 Can not be said to understand
even simple conversation.
Mengetahui,
Collaborator Researcher
Class : VIII
Direction:
Please confidence to tell in front of class.
Please be honestly.
Intruction :
1. Please make the story about narrative text in your life!.
2. Please tell about the story in front of class orally!
Post Test Instrument of Speaking Ability
(Cycle I)
Class : X AK
Direction:
Please Confidence to tells in front of the class.
Please be honestly.
Intruction :
3. Make a group consist of 5 persons for each group!
4. Please tells about the story of narrative text!
5. Perform in front of class.
Post Test Instrument of Speaking Performance
(Cycle II)
Class : VIII
Direction:
Please confidence to tell in front of class.
Please be honestly.
Intruction :
6. Make a group consist of 4 persons each group.
7. Make a concept of the dialogue by chosing explain story about picture
series
8. Perform in front of class orally.
CURRICULUM VITAE
at Junior High School at SMP N 1 sritejokencono and graduated in 2009. After being
graduated from SMP N 1 Sritejokencono, she was enrolled as a student at SMK N 1 Natar
lampung selatan. Then, in 2017, she entered IAIN METRO as an S1 degree student of