Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Introduction
Types of Bored Cast-in-Place Piles
Geotechnical and Construction Problems
Geotechnical Solution and Notes on Drawings
Specifications and Construction Process
Pile Testing
Contract Roles
Conclusions
1
LOADS AND GEOTECHNICAL CAPACITY
Loa ds
La tera l res is ta nce
Overburden
ma teria l (S oil)
S kin F riction
F ounding
ma teria l
Geotechnical Capacity
E nd B ea ring
Bentonite
2
Common Geotechnical Problems in Cast-in-
situ Bored Piles
Bored Pile Foundations on clayey/silty SAND
environment
Selection of Appropriate Geotechnical Parameters
High Ground Water Table and Weak Materials
Unstable Pile Hole in Weak Materials
Soft Toe/Unclean base (Very Important !)
Difficult Penetration in Boulder Material
CONSTRUCTION PROBLEMS
– REINFORCEMENT INSTALLATION
3
CONSTRUCTION PROBLEMS
– CONCRETE PLACEMENT
Freefalling Concrete
Concrete falling too far, not
homogenous, segregation
Vibration Control
In wide, deep piles, vibration
difficult to keep consistent
Necking
Unstable walls collapse in
concrete
4
CONCRETE PLACEMENT IN-
LINE PUMP
Crane
Flexible
tube
Rigid
tube
Pump
CONCRETE PLACEMENT
WITH TREMIE
Working
Hopper
platform
Tremie tube
Top of shaft
5
CONSTRUCTION PROBLEMS
– CONCRETE COMPACTION
6
GEOTECHNICAL SOLUTION DURING
CONSTRUCTION STAGE
7
TYPICAL BORED PILE CONSTRUCTION
PROCESS – WITH CASING
8
PILE TESTING: AS2159/ASTM ???
GEOTECHNICAL STRENGTH
TESTING
9
R=
215
G=
GEOTECHNICAL STRENGTH
Primary
21
B=
R= 0
58
TESTING-PDA LOAD TEST
G=
38
B=
100
R=
10
G=
124
B=
R=
185
Secondary
132
G=
189
B=
R= 0
220
G=
171
B=
230
R=
79
G=
79
B=
R=
79
117
G=
47
Complementary
B=
R=
138
120
G=
177
B=
R=
67
255
G=
127
PDA Load Test Set up- Australia
B=
R=
47
249
G=
190
B= 0
R=
215
G=
PDA LOAD TEST (Contd.)
Primary
21
B=
R=
58 0
G=
38
B=
100
R=
10
G=
124
B=
R=
185
Secondary
132
G=
189
B=
R= 0
220
G=
171
B=
230
R=
79
G=
79
B=
R=
79
117
G=
47
Force and velocity trace CAPWAP Analysis
Complementary
B=
R=
138
120
G= raw data results
177
B=
R=
67
255
G=
PDA Load Results- AUSTRALIA
127
B=
R=
47
249
G=
190
B= 0
10
R=
215
G= STATIC VS. PDA PILE
Primary
21
B=
R= 0
58
G=
LOAD TESTING
38
B=
100
R=
- CASE STUDY
10
G=
124
B=
R=
185
Secondary
132
G=
189
B=
R= 0
220
G=
171
B=
230
R= Very good
79
G=
79
agreement
B=
R=
79
117
between static and
G=
47 PDA load testing
Complementary
B=
R=
138
120
G=
177 Source: Pile foundation
B=
R=
67
255
seminar, 2007 University of
G=
127
Sydney
B=
R=
47
249
G=
190
B= 0
21
B=
R=
58 0
G=
38
B=
100
R=
10
G=
124
B=
R=
185
Secondary
132
G=
189
B=
R= 0
220
G=
171
B=
DAMAGED PILE
230
R=
79 Toe Reflection Reduced cross section
G=
79
B=
R=
79
117
Velocity
G=
47
Complementary
B=
R=
138
120
G=
177 SOUND PILE
B=
R=
67
255
G=
127
B=
R=
Time
47
249
G=
190
B= 0
11
Pile Integrity Testing – Limitations
R=
215
G=
Primary
21
B=
R= 0
58
G=
38
B=
100
R=
10
PHENOMENA NOT DETECTABLE
G=
124
B=
R=
185
Secondary
B=
R=
138
120
G=
177
B=
R=
67
255
G=
127
B=
R=
47
249
G=
190
B= 0
CONTRACT ROLES-DEPENDS
ON PROJECT TYPE
Contractor/Consultant CLIENT
Design & Drawings Resolve design issues
QA System Surveillance
Project Quality Plans Release of Hold
Implementation Points (HP) in association
Obtain Release of HP
with project verifier
12
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS (Contd.)
13
14