Professional Documents
Culture Documents
9: In Situ Stresses
Poor Bearing
Capacity
Good Bearing Capacity Poor Bearing Capacity
1
Learning Objectives
2
Stresses in Saturated Soil without
Seepage
The total stress at the elevation of A is:
𝜎 = 𝐻𝛾𝑤 + 𝐻𝐴 − 𝐻 𝛾𝑠𝑎𝑡
3
Stresses in Saturated Soil without
Seepage
The total stress can be divided into two
parts:
4
Stresses in Saturated Soil without
Seepage
• The total stress can be approximated by:
𝜎 = 𝜎′ + 𝑢
5
Capillary Rise in Soils
7
Capillary Rise in Soils
8
The capillary tubes formed in soils
have variable cross sections because
of the continuity of voids
10
Vertical Stresses in Soil Without Seepage
Vertical Stresses in Soil Without Seepage
Example 1
Example 1
Example 1
Example 1
16
Vertical Stresses in Soil without Seepage
Closed
Vertical Stresses in Soil with Vertical Seepage
19
20
21
22
23
Example 2
H1 = 1.5 m, H2 = 2.5 m, h = 1.5 m, z = 1.25 m
Datum
24
Example 2
H1 = 1.5 m, H2 = 2.5 m, h = 1.5 m, z = 1.25 m
Datum
25
Example 2
H1 = 1.5 m, H2 = 2.5 m, h = 1.5 m, z = 1.25 m
Datum
26
27
“This is one small step for
a man, one giant leap for
mankind.”
“Yes, the surface is fine and powdery. I can kick it up loosely with
my toe. It does adhere in fine layers, like powdered charcoal, to the
sole and sides of my boots. I only go in a small fraction of an inch,
maybe an eighth of an inch, but I can see the footprints of my boots
and the treads in the fine, sandy particles.
1
Learning Objectives
1. Define coefficient of compressibility
2. Define swell index, compression index, and preconsolidation pressure
3. Define normally consolidated (NC) clay and overconsolidated (OC) clay
4. Evaluate overconsolidation ratio (OCR) of a soil sample when its stress history is known
5. Construct field consolidation curve based on laboratory consolidation test data
6. Calculate consolidation settlement of a NC clay layer
7. Calculate consolidation settlement of an OC clay layer
8. Perform sublayer analysis for consolidation settlement
9. Explain how total stress, effective stress, and pore pressure change with time during
consolidation
10. Explain Terzaghi’s 1-D consolidation governing equation
11. List the assumptions behind Terzaghi’s 1-D consolidation governing equation
12. Explain the effect of hydraulic conductivity and coefficient of compressibility on rate of
consolidation
13. Explain the difference between single-drained and double-drained boundary conditions
14. Determine Cv from consolidation test data using the log-t method
15. Predict consolidation settlement at a given time
16. Predict time needed to achieve a given settlement 2
Chap. 11: Compressibility of Soil
3
1-D Field: Initial Condition
Ho vo eo
Field
4
1-D Field: After Loading
v
Ho vo eo e
Field
5
from 1-D Field to 1-D Lab: Sampling, Oedometer Tests
porous stone
Height = 20-30 mm
Field
Lab
6
from 1-D Field to 1-D Lab: Apply initial Pressure
vo
porous stone
Height = 20-30 mm
Field
Lab
7
from 1-D Field to 1-D Lab: Apply External Loading
e
v vo + v
porous stone
Height = 20-30 mm
Field
Lab
8
e - v plot from lab tests
Coefficient of compressibility av
Linear Scale
9
e - v plot from lab tests
Rebound
av Curve (Field)
Cs
1 Virgin
Lab Consolidation
Consolidation Curve (Field)
Curve 1
Cc
Lab rebound
Curve
c
Log Scale
10
e - v plot from lab tests
Rebound
av Curve (Field)
Cs
1 Virgin
Lab Consolidation
Consolidation Curve (Field)
Curve 1
Cc
Lab rebound
Curve
c
Log Scale
11
e - v plot from lab tests
Rebound
av Curve (Field)
Cs
1 Virgin
Lab Consolidation
Consolidation Curve (Field)
Curve 1
Cc
Lab rebound
Curve
c
Log Scale
12
Normally Consolidated vs. Overconsolidated Clays
c
Overconsolidation Ratio: OCR =
c : preconsolidation pressure of a specimen
: present effective vertical pressure
13
14
Determine preconsolidation pressure of a specimen
4 Lines
15
Determine Cc: NC Clay
16
Determine Cc and Cs: OC Clay
17
Example 1
Pressure
Void Ratio (kPa)
0.708 25
0.691 50
0.670 100
2m d = 16.5 kN/m3 0.632 200
Sand
2m sat = 19 kN/m3 0.632 100
0.650 25
2m Gs = 2.7 0.646 50
Clay 0.623 200
w = 28% 0.574 400
0.510 800
Sand 0.445 1600
0.460 400
0.492 100
0.530 25
18
Example 1
0.80
0.70
0.60
Void Ratio
0.50
0.40
0.30
0.20
10 100 1000 10000
Vertical Effective Stress (kPa)
Example 1
0.80
0.70
0.60
Void Ratio
0.50
0.40
0.30
0.20
10 100 1000 10000
Vertical Effective Stress (kPa)
Example 1
0.80
0.70
0.60
Void Ratio
0.50
0.40
0.30
0.20
10 100 1000 10000
Vertical Effective Stress (kPa)
Example 1
0.80
0.70
0.60
Void Ratio
0.50
0.40
0.30
0.20
10 100 1000 10000
Vertical Effective Stress (kPa)
Example 1
0.80
c 140 kPa
0.70
0.60
Void Ratio
0.50
0.40
0.30
0.20
10 100 1000 10000
Vertical Effective Stress (kPa)
Example 1
0.80
c 140 kPa
0.70
0.60
Void Ratio
0.50
0.40
0.30
0.20
10 100 1000 10000
Vertical Effective Stress (kPa)
Example 1
0.80
c 140 kPa
0.70
0.60
Cs
Void Ratio
0.50
0.40
0.30
0.20
10 100 1000 10000
Vertical Effective Stress (kPa)
Example
Pressure
Void Ratio (kPa)
0.708 25
0.691 50
0.670 100
2m d = 16.5 kN/m3 0.632 200
Sand
2m sat = 19 kN/m3 0.632 100
0.650 25
2m Gs = 2.7 0.646 50
Clay 0.623 200
w = 28% 0.574 400
0.510 800
Sand 0.445 1600
0.460 400
0.492 100
0.530 25
26
eo = 0.756 Example
0.80
vo = 70.4 kPa
0.70
0.60
Cs
Void Ratio
0.50
0.40
c 140 kPa
0.30
0.20
10 100 1000 10000
Vertical Effective Stress (kPa)
eo = 0.756 Example
0.80
vo = 70.4 kPa
0.70
0.60
Cs
Void Ratio
0.50
0.40
c 140 kPa
0.30
0.20
10 100 1000 10000
Vertical Effective Stress (kPa)
eo = 0.756 Example
0.80
vo = 70.4 kPa c 140 kPa
0.70
0.60
Cs
Void Ratio
0.50
0.40
0.4eo = 0.30
0.30
0.20
10 100 1000 10000
Vertical Effective Stress (kPa)
eo = 0.756 Example
0.80
vo = 70.4 kPa c 140 kPa
0.70
0.60
Cs
Void Ratio
0.50
0.40
0.4eo = 0.30
0.30
0.20
10 100 1000 10000
Vertical Effective Stress (kPa)
eo = 0.756 Example
0.80
vo = 70.4 kPa c 140 kPa
0.70
0.60
Cs
Cc
Void Ratio
0.50
0.40
0.4eo = 0.30
0.30
0.20
10 100 1000 10000
Vertical Effective Stress (kPa)
Example
Pressure
Void Ratio (kPa)
0.708 25
0.691 50
0.670 100
2m d = 16.5 kN/m3 0.632 200
Sand
2m sat = 19 kN/m3 0.632 100
0.650 25
2m Gs = 2.7 0.646 50
Clay 0.623 200
w = 28% 0.574 400
0.510 800
Sand 0.445 1600
0.460 400
0.492 100
0.530 25
32
How to Calculate Consolidation Settlement ?
Ho
Sc = e NC Clay
1 + eo
v c = vo
e
Virgin Consolidation
Ho vo e
Curve
eo e
vo 1
Cc
v
vo + v
e = Cc log
vo
v (log scale) 33
How to Calculate Consolidation Settlement ?
Ho
Sc = e OC Clay
1 + eo
v vo
c vo
Cs
e c
e
v Virgin
Ho vo Consolidation
Curve
eo e 1
Cc
Case I
vo + v vo + v c
e = Cs log
vo
v (log scale) 34
How to Calculate Consolidation Settlement ?
Ho
Sc = e OC Clay
1 + eo
v vo
c vo
Cs
e c
e Virgin
Ho vo Consolidation
Curve
eo e v
1
Cc
c Case II
e = Cs log
vo vo + v c
vo + v
+ Cc log
c v (log scale) 35
Example 2
2m d = 16.5 kN/m3
Sand
2m sat = 19 kN/m3
2m Gs = 2.7
Clay 4m
w = 28%
Sand
36
37
Example 3
v = 2000 psf Given:
c 2000 psf
10 d = 97.3 pcf
Sand Cc = 0.2
10 sat = 123 pcf Cs = 0.02
Clay 7.5
15 sat = 118 pcf
eo = 0.90
38
39
Example 4
v = 8000 psf Given:
c 6300 psf
10 d = 97.3 pcf
Sand Cc = 0.2
10 sat = 123 pcf Cs = 0.02
Clay 7.5
15 sat = 118 pcf
eo = 0.90
40
41
Example 5
v = 8000 psf Given:
c 6300 psf
10 d = 97.3 pcf
Sand Cc = 0.2
10 sat = 123 pcf Cs = 0.02
Clay 7.5
15 sat = 118 pcf
eo = 0.90
42
43
Excavation Dewatering
44
Excavation Dewatering
45
Sublayer Analysis
46
Example 6
v = 8000 psf Given:
Total Load: P
P = Ps + P w
Distribution ?
53
Variation of total stress, pore
pressure, and effective stress
= u + = u +
Distribution ?
54
Example 7
v = 500 psf
5 d = 110 pcf
Sand
5 sat = 120 pcf
5
Clay sat = 125 pcf
Sand
55
Rate of Consolidation
u u 2 z
= cv 2
t z
cv : Coefficient of Consolidation (L2/T)
k (1 + eo )
cv =
w av
57
58
Rate of Consolidation
u u 2 z
= cv 2
t z
cv : Coefficient of Consolidation (L2/T)
k (1 + eo )
cv =
w av
Assumptions:
59
cv t
Time Factor (Dimensionless) Tv = 2
H dr
St
Average Degree of Consolidation: U = 100%
Sc
62
U vs. Tv
T90 = 0.848
T50 = 0.197
63
SD vs. DD
SD vs. DD
Log-t Method to Determine Cv
66
Example 3 (continued)
Given:
v = 2000 psf
c 2000 psf
Cc = 0.2
10 d = 97.3 pcf Cs = 0.02
Sand
Lab Consolidation Tests:
10 sat = 123 pcf
Double drained
72
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eTGa0fG9HWY
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fbrBqep6IhE
Water coming out of PVD at 2:30 time mark
73
Chapter 17: Subsoil Exploration
1
Learning Objectives
2
Goals of Site Investigation?
3
Groundwater in State College
4
Case History
5
Case History: Leaning Tower of Pisa
6
Case History: Leaning Tower of Pisa
7
Example: Leaning Tower of Pisa
North South
8
Case History: Leaning Tower of Pisa
9
Case History: Leaning Tower of Pisa
10
Factors Controlling Site Investigation
o Structure to be Supported
(1) Size and Importance
(2) Depth of Influence of
Foundations
o Type and Method of
Construction
o Nature of Soil:
weak vs. strong
permeable vs. impermeable
o Geology
11
Types of Site Investigation Methods
• Pits
• Trenches
• Borings – cylindrical
vertical holes made in
the ground
• In situ Testing (SPT,
CPT, etc.)
• Geophysical Tests
12
How Many Borings?
• Depends on the importance of the project
• Minimum 3
• 5 for a rectangular plot – Get “Profiles”
• More required for sites with highly variable profiles
• Experience often helps
• Decide as you proceed !
13
Depth of Boring
• Borings should be extended to a
minimum depth at which
induced additional effective
stress have diminished to
(i) ~10% of the stresses applied
at the base of the foundation
(ii) ~5% of the geostatic stress
present at that depth
Drilling 16
Drill Bits and Augers
17
Drilling with
Continuous Flight Auger
18
Split-spoon Sampler
19
In-Situ Test: Standard Penetration Test (SPT)
• Crude – Hammer a
Sampler into the
Ground, Record the
Resistance
• Done Intermittently
with Drilling of Bore
Holes
20
Standard Penetration Test (SPT)
21
Standard Penetration Test (SPT)
22
SPT Blow Count N
(or NSPT)
23
SPT
Specifications
25
When should SPT be stopped?
26
Limitations of SPT
• Lack of Standardization
• Different hammers produce different driving
energy
• Operator dependent (quality of operation,
method of hammer release affects N)
• Conditions of rope, sampler, cathead affect N
• Sampler type also affects N
• Total string length, tightness of rod
connections affect N
• Borehole diameter affects N
27
Elimination of Uncertainties:
Blow Count Corrections
N60 = ChhrhshbN
28
Hammer Types and Energy Imparted
• Ideally: E = mhammergh
• Pin-weight Hammer: ~70% Efficiency or Energy
Ratio ER (i.e., energy imparted = 0.7 mhammergh)
• Safety Hammer: ~60% ER (standard)
• Donut Hammer: ~45% ER
29
Hammer Correction
ER = Hammer efficiency = hh
30
Interpretations of SPT Blow Count
32
Interpretations of SPT Blow Count
33
Undisturbed Sampling – Shelby Tube
34
Typical Boring
Log with SPT
Blow Count
35
Cone Penetration Test
• A “cone” penetrometer is pushed in
the ground at a constant penetration
rate of 2 cm/s
• Resistance is recorded
• Advantages
– Speed of performance
– Simplicity
– Continuous profiling
– Reliability
36
Cone Specifications
• Cone diameter = 3.57cm
• Cone projected area = 10cm2
• Cone sleeve area = 150cm2
• Cone apex angle = 60o
37
CPT Cone
38
CPT Rigs
• Three types
– Truck-mounted
– Crawler-mounted
– Trailer-mounted
39
Quantities Measured
• Cone tip resistance qc = (Force
acting on Cone)/(Projected Cone
Area)
• Sleeve Resistance fs = (Shear
Force on Cylindrical
Sleeve)/(Sleeve Area)
• Pore pressure (piezocone)
• Shear Wave (seismic cone)
• Temperature
• Chemical Analysis (Envirocone)
40
Interpretation of CPT Data
41
42
Shear failure of soils
Soils generally fail in shear
Embankment
Strip footing
Failure surface
Mobilized shear
resistance
Mobilized
Retaining
shear
wall
resistance
Failure
surface
failure surface
No crushing of
individual grains.
3
Shear failure mechanism
At failure, shear stress along the failure surface () reaches the
shear strength (f).
4
Learning Objectives
1. Calculate the normal and shear stresses on an arbitrary plane when the stress
state is known
2. Draw Mohr’s circle and identify the stress point representing a physical
plane when the stress state is known
3. Explain Mohr-Coulomb failure criteria
4. Judge whether failure occurs at a given stress state
5. Locate the orientation of failure surface
6. Calculate the FOS against shear failure for a plane
7. Explain the difference in their behaviors between dense sand and loose sand
under shear
8. Explain the difference in their behaviors between NC clay and OC clay
under shear
9. Analyze direct shear test data to obtain shear strength parameters
10.Analyze triaxial test data to obtain shear strength parameters
Normal and Shear Stresses: Sign Conventions
Normal and Shear Stresses on a Plane
7
Special Case: n = 0
8
Special Case: n = 0
9
Mohr’s circle
Plane BF
Plane EB
10
11
Special Case
12
Example 1
Given:
x = 120 kPa
y = 300 kPa
= 40 kPa
= 20
Determine:
1 3 n n
Direction of n
13
Example 1
Given:
x = 120 kPa
n y = 300 kPa
= 40 kPa
= 20
Determine:
1 3 n n
Direction of n
15
Example 2
16
Example 2
C
kPa
kPa
O
17
Example 2
C
kPa
kPa
O
P (100, -45)
Plane AC 18
Example 2
C
Q (60, 45)
kPa Plane BC
kPa
O
P (100, -45)
Plane AC19
Example 2
C
Q (60, 45)
kPa Plane BC
kPa
O
P (100, -45)
Plane AC20
Example 2
C
Q (60, 45)
kPa Plane BC
kPa
O
P (100, -45)
Plane AC21
Example 2
C
Q (60, 45)
kPa Plane BC
kPa
O
60
P (100, -45)
Plane AC22
Example 2
C
Q (60, 45)
kPa Plane BC
kPa
O
60
Plane AB
P (100, -45)
Plane AC23
Example 2
C
Q (60, 45)
kPa Plane BC
kPa
O
60
Plane AB
P (100, -45)
Plane AC24
Example 3
kPa
C
kPa
O
25
Example 3
kPa
C
kPa
O
P (80, -30)
Plane AC
26
Example 3
kPa
C
Q (150, 30)
Plane BC
kPa
O
P (80, -30)
Plane AC
27
Example 3
kPa
C
Q (150, 30)
Plane BC
O1 kPa
O
P (80, -30)
Plane AC
28
Example 3
kPa
C
Q (150, 30)
Plane BC
O1 kPa
O
P (80, -30)
Plane AC
29
Example 3
kPa
C
Q (150, 30)
Plane BC
O1 kPa
O
3 1
P (80, -30)
Plane AC
30
Example 3
n
kPa
C
Q (150, 30)
Plane BC
O1 kPa
O
3 1
80
P (80, -30)
Plane AC Plane AB
31
Mohr-Coulomb Failure Criterion
f
Cohesion Friction angle
c
Mohr Circles & Failure Envelope
Failure surface f = c + tan
Y
X
Y X
Soil elements at different locations
34
Mohr Circles & Failure Envelope
v
Y h
h v
Mohr Circles & Failure Envelope
v
Y h
h v
Mohr Circles & Failure Envelope
v
Y h
h v
Mohr Circles & Failure Envelope
f
v
Y h
h v f
Orientation of Failure Plane
1
Failure envelope
3
’
3
1 + 90
3
1
Principle Stresses at Failure
Factor of Safety (FOS) Against Shear Failure
v
Y h
Factor of Safety (FOS) Against Shear Failure
v
f
Y h
FOS on Different Planes
v
Y h
FOS on Different Planes
1
Failure envelope
3
’
3
1 + 90
3
1
FOS on Different Planes
45
Example 4
h
46
47
Laboratory tests
Field conditions
A representative
soil sample
z z
vc vc +
vc vc +
vc
0 0 hc hc
0 vc
50
Shear Strength of Soil: Direct Shear Test
51
52
Loose
53
Dense
54
Determine Friction Angle of Sand
from DS Tests
n ,1 peak
f
ult
n ,1 n,2 n ,3 n
55
Shear Stress vs. Strain: Clay
56
Failure Envelope for Clay
58
Triaxial Shear Test
Piston (to apply deviatoric stress)
Failure plane
O-ring
impervious
membrane
Soil sample Soil
at failure sample
Porous
Perspex stone
cell
Water
Cell pressure
Back pressure Pore pressure or
volume change
pedestal
59
How to determine strength parameters c and
(d)fc
1 = 3 + (d)f
Deviator stress, d
Axial strain
Shear stress,
Mohr – Coulomb
failure envelope
c or ’
3a 3b 3c1a 1b 1c
(d)fa (
60
d)fb
61