Rubric for Peer Evaluation

BME1102 – STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT

Student Name (Group Member to be Evaluated): Allen John Balangue

Section: 21

Task Assigned:

Case abstract whole only me

Vision half

1Competitive Profile Matrix (CPM (created by 4 persons including me

E. Internal Audit 4 persons including me

2- Strengths 4 persons including me

3- Weaknesses 4 persons including me

4- Internal Factor Evaluation (IFE matrix) 4 persons including me

5H. Grand Strategy Matrix (GSM matrix) 4 persons including me

6K. Recommendation 4 persons including me

G. Strategic Position & Action Evaluation (SPACE matrix) 4 persons including me

F. Swot Strategies so wt 4 persons including me

Faculty: TANGPUS, JOHNELYN

ITEMS EXCEEDS MEETS APPROACHING DID NOT MEET

EXPECTATIONS EXPECTATIONS EXPECTATIONS EXPECTATIONS

5 POINTS 4 POINTS 2 POINTS 1

Focus on Consistently stays Focuses on the Sometimes Rarely focuses on
task and focused on task task most of the focuses on the the task Lets
participation: Effectively time. Usually task Sometimes others do the
encourages and encourages and encourages and work and rarely
supports the supports the supports the supports the
efforts of the efforts of the efforts of the efforts of the
group as a whole group as a whole. group as a whole group as a whole

Shared Consistently Usually punctual Sometimes Rarely punctual

responsibilit punctual with with work punctual with with work
y and work responsibilities work responsibilities
dependabilit responsibilities. responsibilities
y Follows through Rarely follows
Follows through on most assigned Follows through through on
on assigned tasks tasks on some assigned task
and does not assigned tasks
depend on others
to do the work;
responsibility for
tasks is evenly
shared

Discussing, Consistently and Usually Sometimes Rarely

listening, respectfully respectfully respectfully respectfully
and listens, interacts, listens, interacts, listens, interacts, listens, interacts,
discussing: discusses, and discusses, and discusses, and discusses, and
contributes to the contributes to the contributes to the contributes to the
group, helping the group, helping the group, helping the group, helping the
group to achieve group to achieve group to achieve group to achieve
a consensus a consensus a consensus a consensus

Teamwork Always Usually Sometimes Rarely contributes

contributes to the contributes to the contributes to the to the overall goal
overall goal of the overall goal of the overall goal of the of the group
group group group

Total:

Summary of Peer Evaluation Points

 Evaluator’s Name Breakdown of Points Total Points / 20
(Person Evaluating) points

1. ACEDERA, Item 1 - _________5 20/20

Ushuiaa Mikyle B.
Item 2 – _________5

Item 3 - __________5

Item 4 - __________5

2 BISCOCHO, Ferida Thea Item 1 - __5_______ 20/20

L.
Item 2 – __5_______

Item 3 - ___5________

Item 4 - ____5_______

3. Member 3: CASTILLO, Item 1 - ____5_____ 20/20

Jhoreena R.
Item 2 – ____5_____

Item 3 - ____5______

Item 4 - ____5______

4. Member 4: GOMEZ, Item 1 - __5________ 20/20

Kyla Isabel M.
Item 2 – __5________
 Item 3 - ___5_______

Item 4 - ___5________

5. Member 5: GRIMALDO, Item 1 - _________5 20/20

Charene Julianne V.
Item 2 – _________5

Item 3 - _________5

Item 4 - _________5_

6. HEFTI, Lichelle Dianne Item 1 - ____5______ 20/20

B.
Item 2 – ____5______

Item 3 - ___5________

Item 4 - ___5________

7. RICAFRENTE, Renalyn Item 1 - 5__________ 20/20

E.
Item 2 – 5__________

Item 3 - 5___________

Item 4 -5 ___________

OVERALL TOTAL 100 100x.10=100

POINTS:
You may add rows and columns if needed.

The Peer Evaluation grade constitutes TEN PERCENT (10%) OF YOUR TOTAL
SUMMATIVE ASSESSMENT POINTS OF YOUR STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT
PAPER.

Note:

Please be objective in evaluating your groupmates. Practice honesty, integrity,

and UPRIGHTNESS.

Directions:

1. Fill out the details at the top part of the form.

2. Evaluate the person by referring to the criteria.

3. At the second part of the evaluation, please summarize the points you have
given to the person evaluated. One evaluation form per one member of the group.

4. Indicate your name as evaluator.

5. The Group Leader will collect all forms and submit it to the faculty via Canvas.
(Faculty will create a submission tab for the submission of the Peer Evaluation
Grade. Please take note that the number of files to be submitted corresponds to the
number of members. Only the Group Leader will submit the file on the date
appointed by the faculty member.)

6. Add the total number of scores.

November 27, 2021 – 10:00 PM – Deadline of the Submission of

Peer Evaluation Forms
 7. Once you have all the summarized scores, add them and divide it with the
number of persons who did the evaluation.

Example:

95 + 100 +90 / 3= 95

8. Your peer evaluation grade is 95%. This will comprise 10% of your total grade
for the summative assessment.

95 x .10 = 9.5