Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Applied Mathematics
JJ II
J I
Home Page
Go Back
Close
2000
c Victoria University
ISSN (electronic): 1443-5756 Quit
130-06
Abstract
In this paper, some integral inequalities are presented by analytic approach. An
open question will be proposed later on.
JJ II
J I
Go Back
Close
Quit
Page 2 of 10
The aim of this paper is to generalize (1.2) in order to obtain some new Title Page
integral inequalities. In the first part of this paper, we will prove Lemma 1.1 and
present some preliminary results. Our main results are Theorem 2.1, Theorem Contents
2.2 which will be proved in Section 2 and Theorem 3.2, Theorem 3.3 which JJ II
will be proved in Section 3. Finally, an open question is proposed. And now,
we begin with a proof of Lemma 1.1.
J I
Go Back
Proof of Lemma 1.1. It is known that
Z 1 Z 1 Close
Z 1 Z 1
2 2
0≤ (f (x) − x) dx = f (x) dx − 2 xf (x) dx + x2 dx, Quit
0 0 0 0
Page 3 of 10
which yields Z 1 Z 1
2 1 J. Ineq. Pure and Appl. Math. 7(4) Art. 120, 2006
f (x) dx ≥ 2 xf (x) dx − . http://jipam.vu.edu.au
0 0 3
R 1 R 1
Let A := 0 x
f (t) dt . By using our assumption we have
Z 1 Z 1 Z 1
1 − x2 1
A= f (t) dt ≥ dx = .
0 x 0 2 3
On the other hand, integrating by parts, we also get
Z 1 Z 1
A= f (t) dt
0 x
Z 1
1 Z 1 Notes on an Integral Inequality
=x f (t) dt + xf (x) dx
x 0 Quô´c Anh Ngô, Du Duc Thang,
0
Z 1 Tran Tat Dat and Dang Anh Tuan
= xf (x) dx.
0
Title Page
Thus Z 1
1 Contents
xf (x) dx ≥ ,
3
0
JJ II
which gives the conclusion.
J I
Remark 1. Condition (1.1) can be rewritten as
Z 1 Z 1 Go Back
(1.3) f (t) dt ≥ tdt, ∀x ∈ [0, 1] . Close
x x
Throughout this paper, we always assume that function f satisfies (1.1), Quit
moreover, we also assume that Page 4 of 10
(1.4) f (x) ≥ 0
J. Ineq. Pure and Appl. Math. 7(4) Art. 120, 2006
for every x ∈ [0, 1]. http://jipam.vu.edu.au
R1 1
Lemma 1.2. 0
xn+1 f (x) dx ≥ n+3
for all n ∈ N.
Proof. We have
Z 1 Z 1 Z 1 Z 1
1
xn f (t) dt d xn+1
f (t) dt dx =
0 x n+1 0 x
Zx=1
1
1
= xn+1 f (t) dt
n+1 x x=0
Z 1 Notes on an Integral Inequality
1
+ xn+1 f (x) dx,
n+1 0 Quô´c Anh Ngô, Du Duc Thang,
Tran Tat Dat and Dang Anh Tuan
which yields
Z 1 Z 1 Z 1 Title Page
n+1 n
x f (x) dx = (n + 1) x f (t) dt dx.
0 0 x Contents
for every n ∈ N.
Proof. By using the Cauchy inequality, we obtain Notes on an Integral Inequality
Thus Z 1 Z 1 Z 1
f n+1
(x) dx + n x n+1
dx ≥ (n + 1) xn f (x) dx. Title Page
0 0 0
Contents
Moreover, by using Lemma 1.2, we get
Z 1 Z 1 Z 1
JJ II
(n + 1) n
x f (x) dx = n n
x f (x) dx + xn f (x) dx J I
0 0 0
Z 1 Go Back
n
≥ + xn f (x) dx,
n+2 0
Close
Quit
that is Z 1 Z 1
n n Page 6 of 10
f n+1 (x) dx + ≥ + xn f (x) dx,
0 n+2 n+2 0
which completes this proof. J. Ineq. Pure and Appl. Math. 7(4) Art. 120, 2006
http://jipam.vu.edu.au
Theorem 2.2. Assume that (1.1) and (1.4) hold. Then
Z 1 Z 1
n+1
f (x) dx ≥ xf n (x) dx
0 0
for every n ∈ N.
Proof. It is known that
(f n (x) − xn ) (f (x) − x) ≥ 0, ∀x ∈ [0, 1] ,
Notes on an Integral Inequality
that is
Quô´c Anh Ngô, Du Duc Thang,
f n+1 (x) + xn+1 ≥ xn f (x) + xf n (x) , ∀x ∈ [0, 1] . Tran Tat Dat and Dang Anh Tuan
By integrating with some simple calculation we conclude that
Z 1 Z 1 Z 1
1 Title Page
n+1 n
f (x) dx + ≥ x f (x) dx + xf n (x) dx.
0 n + 2 0 0 Contents
Once again, by Lemma 1.2, we obtain JJ II
Z 1 Z 1
n+1 1 1 J I
f (x) dx + ≥ + xf n (x) dx,
0 n+2 n+2 0 Go Back
which gives the conclusion.
Close
Remark 2. By the same argument, we see that the result of Lemma 1.2 also Quit
holds when n is a positive real number. That is
Z 1 Page 7 of 10
1
(2.1) xα+1 f (x) dx ≥ , ∀α > 0.
0 α+3 J. Ineq. Pure and Appl. Math. 7(4) Art. 120, 2006
http://jipam.vu.edu.au
3. The Case of Real Numbers
In order to generalize our results, the case of positive real numbers, we recall
another version of the Cauchy inequality as follows.
Theorem 3.1 (General Cauchy inequality). Let α and β be positive real num-
bers satisfying α + β = 1. Then for every positive real numbers x and y, we
always have
αx + βy ≥ xa y β .
Theorem 3.2. Assume that (1.1) and (1.4) hold. Then Notes on an Integral Inequality
Z 1 Z 1
Quô´c Anh Ngô, Du Duc Thang,
α+1
f (x) dx ≥ xα f (x) dx Tran Tat Dat and Dang Anh Tuan
0 0
for every positive real number α > 0.
Title Page
Proof. Using Theorem 3.1 we get
Contents
1 α
f α+1 (x) + xα+1 ≥ xα f (x) , JJ II
α+1 α+1
which gives J I
Z 1 Z 1 Z 1
1 α+1 α α+1 Go Back
f (x) dx + x dx ≥ xα f (x) dx.
α+1 0 α+1 0 0 Close
By the same argument together with (2.1) we obtain
Z 1 Quit
1 α
f α+1 (x) dx + Page 8 of 10
α+1 0 (α + 1) (α + 2)
Z 1 Z 1
1 α α
xα f (x) dx
J. Ineq. Pure and Appl. Math. 7(4) Art. 120, 2006
≥ x f (x) dx + http://jipam.vu.edu.au
α+1 0 α+1 0
Z 1
1 α
≥ xα f (x) dx + .
α+1 0 (α + 1) (α + 2)
Hence Z 1 Z 1
1 α+1 1
f (x) dx ≥ xα f (x) dx.
α+1 0 α+1 0
The present proof is completed.
Theorem 3.3. Assume that (1.1) and (1.4) hold. Then
Z 1 Z 1 Notes on an Integral Inequality
α+1
f (x) dx ≥ xf α (x) dx Quô´c Anh Ngô, Du Duc Thang,
0 0 Tran Tat Dat and Dang Anh Tuan
[4] D.S. MITRINOVIĆ, Analytic Inequalities, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1970. Quô´c Anh Ngô, Du Duc Thang,
Tran Tat Dat and Dang Anh Tuan
[5] D.S. MITRINOVIĆ, J.E. PEČARIĆ AND A.M. FINK, Classical and New
Inequalities in Analysis, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 1993.
Title Page
Contents
JJ II
J I
Go Back
Close
Quit
Page 10 of 10