Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Project Design Journal: Team Name: Team 18 Team Members: Team Norms
Project Design Journal: Team Name: Team 18 Team Members: Team Norms
Team 18
Agenda:
Meetings for our team will be help Tuesday afternoons with the addition of extra days at the
discretion of team members and their progress.
Project Overview:
A variant of Ebola has begun to spread in rural Anggaur Island in Palau. This particular strain is
noticeably more transmittable, thus it has gathered the attention of the World Health
Organization. To stop this spreading, the WHO has implemented a step that involves the
distribution of antiviruses into wells. The robot our task force has been tasked with must be
ENGR 112-532
Team 18
able to identify the correct combination of pellets needed to treat the water and then dispense
them, all automatically.
Meeting Schedule:
Meetings will start by discussing the current project and how we will approach the problem.
Lane Kirstein will serve as the Recorder, Danny Velez will act as the Time Keeper, and Travis
Brudick and Ziyan Hirani will act as designers for the various projects. At the end of each
meetings we will discuss how we could have managed our time and resource better so that the
next meeting will run more efficiently.
Meeting Notes:
Meeting 1: Attended by Travis and Lane. We worked on a few possible designs for the
dispenser, before using one of the sample designs as inspiration for ours. We settled on using a
rotating cup to keep the marbles from getting stuck, and a hole in the side to let them out.
Meeting 2: Attended by Lane, Danny and Ziyan. We finished the design and also finished the
project notebook.
Meeting 3: Entire task force met to work on the marble feeder design.
Meeting 4: Entire task force met to finish the marble feeder design and to finish the code to run
the device.
Meeting 5: Task force met to create the design and build the marble sorter.
Meetings 6-8: Integration of all the parts into a fully functioning robot and work on the code.
Preliminary Designs:
ENGR 112-532
Team 18
Design Challenge 1:
In design challenge 1 we were required to test the response of the Lego light sensor to different
colors. This was important for the overall project because everything hinged on the light
sensors reading the bar code and the marbles correctly.
Design Challenge 2:
For this challenge we had to take measurement about the different marble we would be using
in this project. This challenge was very useful for us as it allowed us to take the necessary
readings and observations to be able to distinguish between the marble types. The data we
gathered from this step is listed below.
ENGR 112-532
Team 18
ENGR 112-532
Team 18
ENGR 112-532
Team 18
Marble Dispenser:
Our initial design features a standard solo cup that rotates about its central axis. The cup has a
hole roughly .25X.75 inches at its base that allows the marbles to fall out as it rotates. The base
of the device is lined with tape that catches all the marbles as they fall, and directs them to a
central chute, so they can fall into a container. Our program is designed to spin at a fast speed
for the first 20 seconds to get the bulk of the marbles out, and then slow down for the second
20 seconds to allow for the last few marbles to fall out.
Marble Card Feeder device:
The marble feeder device works by having two spinning wheels slowly drag the card under the
color reader. The reader takes a reading every one second, which is exactly how long the feeder
moves the card from stripe to stripe. This lets us read all 8 stripes and getting the correct code.
A picture of the device below.
stripe. Then the color sensor feeds the reflected light value into a case structure, if it is black it
outputs the number 1 into an array, and if it is white, it outputs a 0.
Marble Marble
Card Reader Other
Dispenser Sorter
Integration
Final Results:
ENGR 112-532
Team 18
Overall, each of the final components of our design were very successful. Each had very
minor flaws that occurred inconsistently. For example, the inconsistency of the motors turning at
very precise angles caused problems in light sensors correctly determining marble types.
Moreover, each Design Subtask, our components were also very successful, however some
designs did not work well, each subtask brought a component that was worked efficiently and
For the first Subtask, each team in the Task Force created their own marble distributer.
After creating a table of desired characteristics for our marble sorter, along with ranking for each
characteristic, we ranked each Team’s marble distributer and picked the best ranking to improve
and incorporate into the Final Demo. Here, we chose Team 18’s distributor because its design
Subtask 2 required building the Card Reader and the initial marble sorter. Teams 18 and
20 built the Card Reader, while Teams 17 and 19 constructed the Marble Sorter. The Card
Reader, after experimenting with code, began to work flawlessly. The Reader scanned the card at
a consistent power, and took readings of the bar code every second, creating the binary array.
The Reader practically worked flawlessly, hardly ever misreading the bar codes. The marble
sorter also worked flawlessly, implementing simple size sorting methods with the tongue blades,
which lead to series of light sensors to determine the type of marble. A motor would then rotate,
allowing it to fall down the appropriate chute. Since we had such precise angles for the motor
rotations, it was difficult for the Lego motor to consistently rotate the exact angle measurement,
In the Final Demo, our entire apparatus incorporated the marble distributor, but to more
efficiently distribute one marble at a time into the sorter, we incorporating a conveyor belt with
ENGR 112-532
Team 18
notches to grab one marble every ~7 second interval. The motors were mostly consistent in the
demo, not causing many problems in the final demo. However our Card Reader misread a card
the first trial. The Second Trial the Card Reader read all the cards exactly, yet there was a typo in
our code which asked for 13 small red marbles, instead of 3 which was what the Card required.
There were some cases in which the marbles would get stuck at one junction, but they would
eventually become released and dropped into the appropriate chute. Besides that problem, our
Sorter worked very successfully, our incorporated recycle system worked flawlessly, allowing us
Overall, our Sorter was very successful, and had very minimal issues that we could fix, or
References:
Our design was similar to US patent 5944233A, which utilizes a rotor affixed to “two opposed, truncated
cones rotationally mounted” to keep the materials flowing. The idea here is that by keeping the granular
material spinning, it will not be able to get backed up. To contain the marble as they are dispensed, we
built a slide out of tape that catches the released marbles and draws them down to a holding area, where
ENGR 112-532
Team 18
they will then fall off the device one by one. This is also similar to US patent 2575967A, which uses a
hopper to hold the material until it can be measured and dispensed again. A major part of our design
features a conveyor belt type device that will pick up the marbles one at a time from their holding area
and take them where they need to go with the downstream parts of the project. Our system of moving the
marbles is similar to US patent 5333795A, which uses “a high speed, normally closed tubular belt
conveyor system” to transfer granular materials long distances. After our first test with marbles, our