Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Management
Wise Up Online
Chapters
Chapters
1 Planning Ahead p. 3
Part 1.
In this chapter, you will learn some vocabulary related to crisis scenarios, as
well as some word families and collocations. You will also see some important
vocabulary and grammar topics to make it happen.
Now look at the script of Planning Ahead.
PL ANNING AHEAD
What comes to your mind when you hear the word crisis? Hard times,
problems, unemployment, bankruptcy, a damaged reputation? In
general, crises are associated with bad news, either in the job market
or in our personal lives. However, you may have heard that great
opportunities arise during crises.
That is true; but how can you think about seizing an opportunity if the
crisis has brought you or your company to its knees? Crisis management
starts long before the crisis actually arrives. That’s why it is so
important.
Not falling at all is way better than getting up after a fall. From
multinationals to small neighborhood stores, everyone can benefit from
this kind of planning. It can help safeguard the company both financially
and administratively, thus preserving its reputation. For example, let’s
suppose a customer orders a dish in a restaurant and when the waiter
brings it to the table, they realize it's mildly burnt. What are the chances
of this customer dining at this restaurant again? Pretty low, right? But
the problem does not end there. The displeased customer will probably
spread the news and warn people in their social circle not to visit that
place.
The first step is to survey all possible sources of a potential crisis. Take
a look at your business or your own life and consider what could go
wrong. Write down a list of all the ideas that arise. That list will be very
important to guide you through the development of multiple scenarios.
Each scenario you imagine should take into account the risks involved.
It’s as if you were trying to answer the question: what could happen to
that restaurant after serving burnt food to a customer?
This source of crisis carries two main risks. The first one is financial, as
the accounting firm will have to compensate for the damage caused
to the client. But there is also the risk related to reputation, which can
either push away new clients or cause the firm to lose its current ones.
PL ANE JAMENTO
O que vem à sua cabeça quando você ouve a palavra crise? Tempos
difíceis, problemas, desemprego, falência, uma reputação prejudicada?
De um modo geral, crises são associadas a notícias ruins, seja no
mercado de trabalho ou em nossas vidas pessoais. Porém, você já deve
ter ouvido falar que grandes oportunidades surgem durante as crises.
Part 2.
Crises can happen in various moments and for different reasons. They may
happen in the company we work for, in projects we are drawing up, as well as in
our personal lives.
You may have already been caught in the middle of a problematic situation to
be solved within one of these scenarios. In fact, many people must have been in
situations like that.
However, not everyone shares the same perspective when it comes to describing
what a crisis is like. Check it out:
What comes to your mind when you hear the word crisis?
O que vem à sua cabeça quando você ouve a palavra crise?
Here, we have the word crisis, which is singular. Its plural is crises, with an e
instead of an i. Take a look:
singular plural
crisis crises
crise crises
hard times
tempos difíceis
Hard times is formed with the adjective hard – which means difficult or tough
– and the noun times – which is the same as moments. Note that the adjective
comes before the noun. This is a very common position for adjectives in English.
Note that, in hard times, the word times ends in -s because it is plural. It refers to
a particular period of time in history. It is different from the word time when we
talk about hours. Take a look:
When using the word time meaning hours of the day, it does not have a plural
form. Note that, in this sentence, we are not talking about a particular period of time
in history, but about the time we can count in hours, minutes and seconds.
However, as previously mentioned, when we talk about crises as hard times, we are
referring to a difficult period in the history of the world, of the company, or our own.
Other recurring terms related to crisis – which are essentially its basis – are:
problems difficulty
problemas dificuldade
Problems is a plural noun ending in -s that comes from the singular problem,
which means something that causes trouble. Its meaning is similar to that of the
word difficulty.
To mention that someone is experiencing a problem or a moment of difficulty, we
can use the verb to have. Take a look at the following example:
Here, the verb to have comes in the expression to have a problem with, which
means the same as to experience a problem. In this sentence, we are saying that
someone is experiencing problems setting up a cell phone. Also note that we use
the preposition with in this structure.
As mentioned earlier, we can also use the verb to have with the noun difficulty;
however, it comes with a different preposition. Observe:
TO HAVE DIFFICULT Y IN
ter / vivenciar dificuldade em
Here, we are using the verb to have along with difficulty to mention that
someone is experiencing difficulty in learning sign language. Note that instead
of with as in to have a problem with, we use the preposition in, forming the
expression to have difficulty in.
Both expressions have similar meanings; however, it is important to notice that
some words can have the same spelling but different meanings, depending on
the context.
We have just worked with the same word class with times and time, be it to refer
to a particular period in history or to hours, minutes and seconds. Time and
times are both nouns. Nouns are used to name things, abstract ideas, people,
places, and animals.
However, there are words formed from a root of a different word class; therefore,
they have a different function as well.
When we talked about hard times, we mentioned that hard means difficult.
Both hard and difficult are adjectives. We have also mentioned that the word
problem means the same as difficulty, both nouns.
Although the difference between the adjective hard and the noun problem is
obvious, the difference between the spelling of the adjective difficult and the
noun difficulty is just the letter -y at the end. This happens because they belong
to the same word family, even though they have different functions.
It means that those words have the same root, and we change their word class
by adding suffixes and prefixes. Suffixes are letters or syllables added to the
end of a word; prefixes are letters or syllables added to the beginning of a word.
Take a look at the following words:
employment unemployment
emprego desemprego
Here, we have the words employment, which means the condition of having a
paid job, and unemployment, meaning the condition of not having a paid job.
The root of both nouns is the verb to employ, which means to hire someone
or to give someone a job. Both nouns have the suffix -ment, that is, -ment
comes at the end of the verb, which turns employ into a noun. Note that the
word unemployment also carries a prefix, un-, at the beginning of the word. This
prefix implies a negative connotation to the noun.
Employment and unemployment are related to the condition of having or not
having a paid job. Job is a noun, but its meaning depends on the context, even
though its spelling does not change. For example:
Here, the word job is referring to work somebody does and is paid for. In this
case, someone is working in a supermarket and being paid for it, so, their job is to
work at the supermarket. Note that here we use the verb to have conveying the
idea of possession.
The noun job is also used to refer to something you are responsible for doing,
such as a task or duty, whether or not it is done in return for payment. Let’s take
a look at the following examples:
In the first example, job is referring to the responsibility of taking care of children,
that is, the task or duty that this person is in charge of is to take care of children,
as a kindergarten teacher or as a babysitter. This means that the person is
supposed to be paid to work with children, which is the plural of child.
In the second example, it is said that the parents’ job is to take care of their
children; however, we are talking about a responsibility for which parents are not
given a sum of money to carry out; even so, they have to do it.
Although the word job may or may not be used to refer to work that is done
in exchange for money, we can see, in short, that job and work are related.
However, work can be used both as a noun and as a verb. That is, the same
word has different functions. Take a look:
WORK (NOUN)
trabalho
In the first example, work is a noun that refers to a specific activity or chore
someone has to do. In the second example, work is also a noun, but it refers to
the place where someone works, like an office building, for example.
In both sentences, work is a noun, but its meaning is slightly different, and it all
depends on the context. So, keep in mind that you need to be attentive to it.
Now, check the following examples with work used as a verb:
TO WORK ( VERB)
trabalhar
In the first sentence, the verb to work means to do a job in exchange for
money. In this case, Lola works for a certain period of hours to receive an amount
at some point.
In the second sentence, we have the verb to work followed by the preposition on
being used to talk about improving something. Note that, in this last example,
we are not talking about a transaction of work and money, since it is Morgan’s
own mental health that we are referring to.
It is also important to highlight that, although work and job are words that can be
related as nouns, job cannot be used as a verb.
When it comes to words that share the same root, one example would be
bankrupt and bankruptcy. They are also related to a crisis scenario. Check it out:
bankruptcy bankrupt
falência falido
Note that the only difference they have in spelling is the suffix -cy. Bankruptcy
is a noun that refers to a situation in which a business or a person becomes
unable to pay what they owe, because they have no money. On the other hand,
bankrupt is an adjective that means not being able to pay what you owe. For
example:
Here, bankrupt is describing the noun store. Note that we use the verb to be to
make that description. In other words, the store has no money to pay its bills.
However, when we want to refer to the process of something or somebody
becoming unable to pay what they owe, we use the expression to go bankrupt.
Take a look:
TO GO BANKRUPT
ir à falência
TO BANKRUPT
falir
If the manager keeps on giving free meals, he is going to bankrupt the restaurant.
Se o gerente continuar dando refeições grátis, ele vai falir o restaurante.
Here, we have the verb to bankrupt being used to talk about the act of causing bankruptcy. In
this case, the manager will be responsible for the bankruptcy of the restaurant.
Going bankrupt is one element related to crises. Here are others:
Here, we have the word damaged, an adjective that means ruined or harmed. A
damaged reputation is the consequence of negative opinions people have about
someone or something. When we talk about a damaged reputation, we refer to one
that has been discredited. In this case, we use damaged to refer to an abstract idea.
Damaged can also be used to talk about someone’s feelings. Take a look:
A damaged person.
Uma pessoa ferida.
In a damaged person, we are not talking about someone who was literally hurt, with a
cut or a stab wound, for example. We are referring to an emotional injury.
In order to refer to a physical injury, we would use the adjective hurt. For instance:
HURT
ferido / machucado
In the previous example, we use damaged goods to talk about objects that may
be broken or no longer working properly. Notice that the word goods is a noun
that means products. It is different from good, which is an adjective meaning of
high quality.
In this case, we could say:
Here, the adjective good is characterizing the noun products. It implies that
a product is of high quality. It is important to note that there is no plural for
adjectives. Therefore, goods will always be a noun, and good will always be an
adjective.
Good and goods are very similar words with very distinct meanings and uses.
Damaged, which we just mentioned, also has its root in a word that has different
uses.
In the word family of the adjective damaged, we will find the noun damage, as
well as the verb to damage. Take a look:
damage
prejuízo / ferida / dano
In this context, also related to a crisis scenario, damage is the same as a bad
effect. Note another element that comes up when we think about crises:
financial gap. It implies financial loss, that is, the loss of money, and damage is
the result.
Now, as a verb, we can use to damage to say:
TO DAMAGE
prejudicar / ferir / danificar
error mistake
erro erro
Error and mistake can basically mean something someone did or that happened
incorrectly. Both previous examples are correct; however, there is a slight change
in the use of each one of them.
On the one hand, errors sounds more formal, and usually refers to something
that was done in a wrong way due to lack of previous knowledge. Mistakes, on
the other hand, sounds more informal, and implies that something was done the
wrong way unintentionally, due to lack of attention, not of knowledge.
Error and mistake also have specific uses. For example:
John, help me! I don’t understand this error notification in this software.
John, me ajude! Eu não entendo esta notificação de erro neste programa.
Here, we use mistake because the sentence says that firing Emma will cause bad
results. In this case, it would not be possible to replace mistake with error.
Mistake can also be part of collocations formed with specific verbs. For example:
TO MAKE A MISTAKE
errar / cometer um erro
To make a mistake is formed by the verb to make and the noun mistake. This
collocation means to do something wrong unintentionally. In the context of the
previous example, you could do something wrong due to anxiety, without really
meaning it.
Mistake, here, is a noun, but the same word can be used as a verb. Then, it will
have a slight different meaning compared to the collocation that we have just
seen. For example:
TO MISTAKE
confundir / entender errado
In this case, to mistake means to understand something wrongly. In the example, we are saying that
the director misunderstands the complaints from the employees.
To mistake can have yet another meaning, which is to confuse someone with another person, as in:
In the previous example, the grandmother often thinks that the cousin and the wife of the speaker are
the same person. In other words, she confuses one with the other. Pay attention to the use of the
preposition for in this structure. The full structure of this expression is to mistake a person or a thing for
someone or something else.
In most cases and uses, we can refer to mistake as a source of crisis. Moreover, up until this point, you
have seen many different situations that can cause a crisis, but all of them are under our control and
responsibility: money, errors, mistakes, damaged reputation, and unemployment.
However, not every crisis comes from things we can manage. There are also natural disasters to take
into account:
Here, we have listed some factors that we cannot control; among them, fire is a
word with interesting possibilities. Take a look:
FIRE (NOUN)
As a noun, it may refer to uncontrolled flames that burn everything they touch.
It could also mean just the flames made to heat a place, or that we use for
cooking. The noun fire may also be a synonym for bonfire, which is usually made
of wood and used as part of a celebration, to burn trash, or as a signal.
There are some collocations we can use with this noun. Check them out:
Moreover, the word fire can be a verb with different meanings. Take a look:
TO FIRE
disparar / atirar
To fire can mean to shoot a weapon, as in to fire at the enemy, that is to shoot
a weapon towards the enemy.
In a different context, it can mean to dismiss someone from a job, as in:
TO FIRE
demitir
When we fire someone, that person becomes unemployed, which brings us back
to the context of crisis.
Regardless of the cause of a crisis, we must always bear in mind that its
consequences will also affect the customer. As a result:
The displeased customer will probably spread the news and warn
people in their social circle not to visit that place.
O cliente insatisfeito, provavelmente, espalhará a notícia e avisará as
pessoas em seu círculo social para não frequentarem aquele local.
Take a look at the word displeased, which is describing the noun customer. This
is an adjective and a synonym for dissatisfied. Note that these adjectives are
formed by the prefix dis-, which implies a negative connotation. The opposite of
these adjectives is pleased and satisfied. Take a look:
ADJE CTIVES
There are also some verbs that are worth highlighting in this sentence. To spread
is being used in the collocation to spread the news, which is to make something
widely known. Another collocation that could be used with the same meaning is
to spread the word.
Notice that news is a word ending in -s, but it is one case in which -s does not
mean plural. In fact, there is no plural for news. It is important to mention that we
must be careful not to confuse news with new. New is an adjective which is the
opposite of old.
There are other collocations with the verb to spread. Take a look:
to spread gossip
espalhar fofoca
to foresee to predict
prever prever
All of that will help us be prepared. There are some expressions we can use
when something unpredictable happens to us. Take a look:
EXPRESSIONS
to be caught by surprise
ser pego de surpresa
to be caught off-guard
ser pego desprevenido
to be unprepared
estar despreparado
In this part of the chapter, you have learned that, in the same
word family, we can have verbs, adjectives and nouns with different
meanings and uses. You have also learned some words related to crisis
scenarios caused both by human and natural factors, as well as some
verbs, expressions and collocations.
Part 3.
Activities
A. Number the columns according to the translation of the words.
( 2 ) produtos ( ) to mistake
( 9 ) insatisfeito ( ) to be unprepared
( 10 ) prever ( ) unemployment
B. Fill in the blanks with the appropriate words according to the translation.
Part 4.
In the grammar part of this chapter, we are going to see some important grammar
topics on the structure of sentences in English.
It is important to know the differences in structure when we make up sentences.
There are usually three forms of sentences: the affirmative form, the negative
form and the interrogative form. There can be slight changes in each of these
kinds of sentences according to the verb form we use.
First, let’s start with the affirmative form. Take a look:
AFFIRMATIVE FORM
general structure
estrutura geral
The basic structure of affirmative sentences is: subject followed by a main verb
and a complement. Depending on the verb form we use, the structure will also
have an auxiliary verb, which must come before the main verb. So, we will have:
subject, the auxiliary verb, followed by the main verb, and the complement.
Let’s see an example:
SIMPLE PRESENT
Affirmative Form
In this sentence, we have the subject, Lola, a proper noun, followed by the main
verb works and the complement every day from 9 a.m. to 7 p.m. Notice that we
are talking about something that is habitual, part of Lola’s routine.
We do not have an auxiliary verb in the previous sentence, just the main verb:
works. That happens because the verb form used is the simple present.
The simple present is a verb form used to talk about facts, routine, habitual
actions and events that frequently happen in the present.
Let’s take a look at another example in the affirmative form of the simple
present:
SIMPLE PRESENT
Affirmative Form
In this sentence, the subject is expired licenses, which corresponds to the subject
pronoun of the third person plural they. Then, we have the main verb damage in
the base form and the complement the progress of projects. Here, we are using
the simple present to talk about a fact: the bad effect caused by expired licenses.
With the exception of the verb to be, in the simple present, the conjugation of the
verbs is always the same as the base form for all persons in the plural and for the
first and second persons in the singular.
Take a look at another example:
SIMPLE PRESENT
Affirmative Form
In this case, the subject is the first person plural, we, followed by the main verb
to work in the base form, and the complement every day to improve our skills.
Note that, as we mentioned before, the conjugation of the main verb is the same
as the base form because we is the first person plural.
When it comes to the third person singular, the conjugation changes a bit. In
general, we add -s to the base form of the verb. The sentence structure does not
change. For example:
SIMPLE PRESENT
Affirmative Form
SIMPLE PRESENT
Third Person Singular – Spelling Rules
Verbs ending in -o, -z, -ss, -sh, -ch, and -x = add -es.
Verbos terminados em -o, -z, -ss, -sh, -ch, e -x = acrescente -es.
In verbs ending in consonant + -y, we must drop the letter -y and add -ies to the
end of the verb; and in verbs ending in -o, -z, -ss, -sh, -ch, or -x, we must add
-es after the last letter of the verb.
There is also an exception concerning spelling in the third person singular, which
is the verb to have. It becomes has, not haves. Take a look:
Here, the subject is Gail, which corresponds to the third person singular she,
followed by the main verb to have conjugated according to the subject as has,
and the complement a nice job at the supermarket. In this context, the simple
present is being used to talk about a fact.
It is also possible to use the verb to be in the simple present. However, when it
comes to conjugation, the rules will change because each person, singular and
plural, has a specific conjugation.
We use the verb to be in the simple present to make descriptions, talk about
facts and permanent or temporary states, depending on the context.
For example:
Here, we have the subject this store, which corresponds to the third person
singular it, followed by the main verb to be conjugated according to the subject
as is, and the complement bankrupt. We are describing the store’s current
situation. In this case, it is a temporary situation. The conjugation is will be used
with all third persons singular - he and she - as well.
SIMPLE PRESENT
Conjugation of the Verb To Be
he, she, it is
ele, ela, ele/ela é/está
Here, the subject is I, which is the first person singular. Next, we have the main verb to
be, conjugated according to the subject as am, which is the conjugation of the first person
singular. Lastly, we have the complement very happy for your promotion at work. Notice
that we are talking about a temporary state in the present.
SIMPLE PRESENT
Conjugation of the Verb To Be
I am
eu sou / estou
Here, the subject of the sentence is Luiz and Keith, which corresponds to the
third person plural they, followed by the main verb to be, conjugated according to
the subject as are, and the complement very good employees. In this sentence,
we are using the verb to be to talk about a permanent state in the present. It’s a
condition, a characteristic of the subject.
This conjugation – are – is also used for the subject pronoun you, which
corresponds to the second persons singular and plural. We also use are for the
first person plural, we. Observe:
}
SIMPLE PRESENT
Conjugation of the Verb To Be
you (singular)
você é/está
we
nós somos/estamos
are
you ( plural)
vocês são/estão
they
eles/elas são/estão
Notice that the structure of affirmative sentences with verbs in the simple present is actually
just one. It will always be subject + main verb + complement, no matter the verb we use.
Even though there is a specific conjugation for the verb to be for each subject, and we have
specific rules in the third person singular according to the spelling of the base form of other
verbs, the way we form affirmative sentences in the simple present is exactly the same.
However, there is yet another use for the verb to be that differs from this one in the simple
present. The verb to be can also be used as an auxiliary verb, not as the main verb, when we
want to talk about things that are happening at the moment of the speech.
To do so, we are going to use another verb form called present continuous. Take a look:
PRESENT CONTINUOUS
Affirmative Form
events in progress
acontecimentos em progresso
In this sentence, we have the subject the restaurant, which corresponds to the third
person singular it, the auxiliary verb to be conjugated in the present as is, the main verb
to go in the -ing form as going, and the complement bankrupt.
At the beginning of this chapter, we mentioned that the use of auxiliary verbs in the
structure of the affirmative form would depend on the verb form we use. As we are talking
about the present continuous, we must use the auxiliary verb to be in every sentence.
Note that, in the previous example, the main verb is in the -ing form and the auxiliary
verb to be is conjugated according to the subject in the present. This goes for any
subject and in any sentence in the present continuous.
Let’s see another example:
PRESENT CONTINUOUS
Affirmative Form
events in progress
acontecimentos em progresso
In this example, we have the subject Christian and Monica, which corresponds
to the subject pronoun of the third person plural they, followed by the auxiliary
verb to be conjugated in the present according to the subject as are, the main
verb in the -ing form, cooking, and the complement, dinner right now. Here, we
are talking about an event in the present that is in progress at the moment of
speaking.
Besides being used to talk about events in progress, the present continuous can
also be used to refer to previously-planned and expected future events.
To better understand how this works, here is a fictional situation as background:
Anthony is the director of a chain store who has to fire some of the
employees to be able to the keep the business going and avoid a bigger
crisis. A group of employees is having lunch together and ends up
talking about it.
Anthony é o diretor de uma rede de lojas que tem que demitir alguns
dos funcionários para conseguir manter o negócio funcionando e evitar
uma crise maior. Um grupo de funcionários está almoçando junto e acaba
falando sobre isso.
PRESENT CONTINUOUS
future events
acontecimentos futuros
In this case, the speaker uses the present continuous to talk about something that is
going to happen in the future. Due to the crises in the chain store, Anthony will fire
some of the employees. It is something that can be foreseen or predicted. Note that
the future is also being indicated by next week.
Even though the time reference changes in this context, the structure of the sentence
does not. The subject is Anthony, which corresponds to the third person singular he,
followed by the auxiliary verb to be conjugated in the present according to the subject
as is, the main verb in the -ing form, firing, and the complement is the rest of the
sentence.
Now, let’s see some examples with the present continuous in other contexts. Take a
look:
PRESENT CONTINUOUS
Affirmative Form
future events
acontecimentos futuros
We have the subject Pablo, which corresponds to the subject pronoun of the third person
singular he, followed by the auxiliary verb to be conjugated in the present according to the
subject as is, the main verb in the -ing form starting, and the complement a new painting
tomorrow. In this example, we are talking about an event which was previously planned. It is
not a prediction or something we suppose will happen. It becomes obvious we are talking about
an event in the future because of the word tomorrow.
Note that the structure here is the same as the one we use to talk about situations in progress
at the moment of speaking, which is: subject + auxiliary verb to be + main verb in the -ing
form + complement.
We have seen that the present continuous is used to talk about the future when it is something
previously planned or expected. However, this is not the only way to talk about future events
which are to happen: we can also use the modal verb will.
Will does not convey the idea of something that was planned to happen in the future. Actually,
it is used to make future promises, to express decisions made at the moment of speaking, or
to make assumptions. It implies the idea of inevitability, something you are certain that will
happen based on your opinion. Within some contexts, it shows an implicit willingness to do
something, or that something will happen as expected.
It is important to know that will works as an auxiliary verb when it comes to sentence
structure. Therefore, the affirmative structure is the same as we have previously seen with the
present continuous: subject + auxiliary verb + main verb + complement. What changes here
is the auxiliary verb – which now is the modal verb will, not the verb to be. Another difference
is that the main verb remains in the base form for all subjects.
Take a look:
subject + modal verb will + main verb in the base form + complement
sujeito + modal verb will + verbo principal na forma base + complemento
The displeased customer will spread the word about your poor service.
O cliente insatisfeito vai espalhar a notícia sobre seu mau serviço.
Here, we have the subject the displeased customer, followed by will, the main verb in the
base form spread, and the complement the word about your poor service. Here, the speaker is
predicting a consequence that will certainly happen based on his intuition.
Now, let’s think about the following situation:
You are in the living room with your significant other and the telephone rings. Right
away, the other person attempts to stand up to answer the phone, but you know how
tired she or he is.
Você está na sala de estar com seu companheiro ou companheira e o telefone toca.
Imediatamente, a outra pessoa tenta se levantar para atender ao telefone, mas você sabe
o quão cansado ou cansada ele ou ela está.
Here, we are using the modal verb will to say that we will promptly answer the phone. Hence,
it is an immediate decision, made at the moment of speaking. It can also be interpreted as an act
of willingness to get the phone and spare the other person. Notice the structure is the same as
previously seen, with one minor difference: the subject is contracted with the modal verb will as
I’ll. It sounds more natural and informal. Apart from that, the main verb answer remains in the
base form, followed by the complement the phone.
Have a look at another example:
subject + modal verb will + main verb in the base form + complement
sujeito + modal verb will + verbo principal na forma base + complemento
immediate decision
decisão imediata
Again, the subject and the modal verb will are in the contracted form: I’ll. The main verb is in
the base form as make, and the complement is a sandwich. Here, as the subject was hungry,
he made a decision to make himself a sandwich. It’s a future decision made at the moment he
felt that way. Notice that the first sentence was built with the verb to be in the simple present,
because it is a temporary situation.
Another use of will is when we make promises. Take a look:
subject + modal verb will + main verb in the base form + complement
sujeito + modal verb will + verbo principal na forma base + complemento
promises
promessas
Here, we have the subject I, the modal verb will, the main verb in the base form stay, and
the complement with you whether in happy or difficult times. In this sentence, the subject is
making somebody a promise to never leave their side in the future.
GRAMMAR GUIDE
Part 5.
Activities
A. Rearrange the following elements to form affirmative sentences.
3. The restaurant .
O restaurante está falindo.
Part 1.
In this chapter, you will learn some vocabulary related to planning and taking
action, as well as some terms related to the corporate world, sports, and
games. You will also see some important vocabulary and grammar topics.
Now look at the script of Preparing the Team.
After considering the various possible sources of a crisis that can strike
a company and developing scenarios and action plans for each of them,
it’s time to put the crisis management plan into action. And just like the
act of planning, the plan itself can be implemented long before the crisis
actually happens. And there is a very good reason why this should be
done as soon as possible.
Who do you think has the best chances of winning a chess match?
Someone who has just learned the basic rules of the game and knows
very little about its strategies, or a veteran player who studies the game
in depth? Putting it this way, the answer seems obvious, doesn’t it?
The crisis management plan must evolve over time, either through the
contributions of the team or the regular review of the sources of crisis
and the risks involved. This is essential to adapt the crisis management
plan to the reality of the company and the market.
PREPARANDO A E QUIPE
Quem você acha que tem mais chances de ganhar uma partida de
xadrez: uma pessoa que acabou de aprender as regras básicas do jogo
e sabe muito pouco sobre suas estratégias, ou um jogador veterano que
estuda o jogo a fundo? Falando desta forma, a resposta parece óbvia,
não parece?
Uma equipe bem treinada será capaz de conter a crise antes que ela
aumente. É nesse sentido que os colaboradores desempenham um
papel fundamental na gestão de crise. Além de executarem as ações
planejadas pela direção da empresa, eles podem contribuir para o
aperfeiçoamento do plano. Uma vez envolvidos com os aspectos
operacionais de suas tarefas e processos, eles tendem a ter uma
perspectiva diferente da do gerente. Por isso, os gestores responsáveis
por elaborar o plano de gestão de crise devem estar sempre abertos a
sugestões.
Part 2.
In the first chapter of this module, we talked about the importance of being
prepared for moments of crisis, both in our professional and personal lives. Within
this context, we learned some collocations, word families, and other vocabulary
elements.
Now we are going to discuss another perspective about what is necessary in
crisis management. It is worth remembering that it goes beyond planning and
involves actively doing something, in addition to requiring a well-prepared team.
Once the preparation step is complete, we can say:
Here, we are talking about the right moment to start acting. To do so, we have the
crisis management plan between the verb to put and into action. It comes from the
collocation to put something into action, which means to start using something,
be it a plan, an idea, or knowledge. In this sentence, we are basically saying that it is
time to start using the crisis management plan.
We could also use practice instead of action in this collocation. To put something
into practice has a similar meaning to that of to put something into action:
Note that crisis management plan is formed by three words – crisis, management
and plan - and it is a compound noun.
There is also another compound noun with the word plan that is commonly used
when talking about solutions to crises. Take a look:
ACTION PL AN
plano de ação
The team can also collaborate in the development of the action plan.
A equipe também pode colaborar na concepção do plano de ação.
Here, we see action plan, a compound noun formed by the nouns action and
plan. In this case, unlike the previously-mentioned collocation, the word practice
cannot replace the word action.
In the vocabulary part of the previous chapter, we learned that similar words or
words with the same root can be from different classes and have different uses.
This also happens with the noun action.
The noun action means the process of doing something, especially in order to
achieve a particular result. It has its origins in the verb to act plus -ion, a really
common suffix in the formation of nouns in English.
Action and to act come from the same word family, for they share the same
root. The word act can have different meanings depending on the context. As
a verb, to act means to do something in a particular way or for a particular
reason. For example:
TO ACT
agir
In this sentence, the verb to act is used to talk about the measures the company
is supposed to take.
In a different context, to act can imply having an attitude that is not the one
you would normally have. To do so, we use an adjective right after the verb to
act. For example:
Here, the verb to act is followed by the adjective crazy, which means mad, or out
of control. In this sentence, the idea is that John is upset, acting in a way that he
usually does not act.
We could also use other adjectives in this formation as well. For example:
The verb to act can also be used with nouns to talk about the way someone
behaves. In this case, we are going to need the word like – which works as a
preposition and conveys the idea of similarity – followed by the indefinite article
and a noun. It is very important to point out that, here, like is different from the
verb to like, which means to enjoy something or to think that it is nice or good.
Take a look at the following examples:
Here, we have to act like a baby, which is formed by the verb to act + like + the
indefinite article a + the noun baby. It means to behave as if you were a baby or,
in other words, it means to be immature. We can also use the noun child and say
to act like a child with a similar meaning.
Check out another example with the same construction:
Here, we are using the noun victim, which means someone or something that
has suffered, either because of the actions of someone or something. To act
like a victim means that someone behaves as if they were a victim of the
circumstances, when, in fact, they are not. The idea is that the person does not
own any responsibility concerning the problem, and therefore acts like a victim. It
would also be okay to say to play the victim in this case.
There are yet other applications for the verb to act, with other ideas. For example,
to act can mean to perform when we talk about films and plays. Take a look:
TO ACT
atuar
In this sentence, we use the verb to act to say that Greg is performing or playing
a role in a film. From the context, we can assume Greg is an actor.
In addition to being used as a verb, the word act can also be a noun and have
different uses. In the context of theater and literature, it refers to one of the main
parts into which a stage play is divided. Check it out:
In this case, the word act comes with a determiner, which can be either a
cardinal or an ordinal number. As we can see in the previous examples, we can
say: act one or first act, act two or second act, and so on.
In a different context, the noun act can mean the same as pretense. For example:
ACT
fingimento
Here, we are using act to say that Sarah is pretending to be sad, she is not being
genuine. Note that, before the noun in this context, we use the indefinite article
an, which is another kind of determiner.
The noun act can also precede another noun that points out a specific attitude.
For example:
AN ACT OF COURAGE
um ato de coragem
An act of courage implies that someone has a brave attitude. Here, we have
the indefinite article an followed by the noun act, the preposition of, and another
noun: courage.
There are yet other possibilities for this use of the noun act. Take a look:
ACT + OF + NOUN
an act of violence
um ato de violência
an act of generosity
um ato de generosidade
an act of faith
um ato de fé
In the first sentence, we have acts of violence, which conveys the idea that people
are speaking or reacting brutally to something. Note that, here, we are using the
plural form of act, acts; therefore, there is no indefinite article.
In the second sentence, we have an act of generosity, conveying the idea that
helping people is a generous attitude.
Finally, we have an act of faith, conveying the idea that believing things can get
better is a behavior based on a strong feeling of trust.
The noun act can also be followed by of and a verb in the -ing form. For instance:
Just like the act of planning, the plan itself can be implemented long
before the crisis actually happens.
Assim como o ato de planejar, o plano em si pode ser implantado muito
antes da crise realmente surgir.
In the previous example, the noun act means a specific action performed by
someone for a specific result. Here, act is part of the collocation act of doing
something.
Planning comes from the verb to plan. Plan can also be a noun, as we have here
in the plan. The verb to plan means to think carefully about something you intend
to do and decide when and how to do it. Here, it is in the -ing form, as it comes
after the preposition of.
Take a look at another example with the verb to plan:
TO PL AN
planejar
In this example, we have the verb to plan also in the -ing form, as planning. This
use of the -ing is due to the fact that the sentence is conjugated in the present
continuous. It implies an action in progress at the moment of speaking.
As a noun, plan can also be part of some very common collocations used in the
context of crisis management. Let’s check out some examples:
PL AN
plano
Here, we have collocations with different verbs followed by the noun plan to
describe different steps that involve crisis management procedures.
Take a look at a sentence with one of the collocations previously mentioned:
OPEN ≠ CLOSED
aberto ≠ fechado
In this sentence, we are saying that the restaurant is not open, that is, we cannot
just go in and have a meal there. Therefore, it would also be correct to say that
the restaurant is closed.
The word open can also be used as a verb. For example:
TO OPEN
abrir
In the previous example, open has a literal meaning. The window will literally be
opened.
The opposite verb is to close. So, in a reverse situation, we could say:
TO CLOSE
fechar
As well as the nouns open and close, we can also use the verbs to open and to
close figuratively. Check it out:
TO OPEN ≠ TO CLOSE
abrir ≠ fechar
Here, the verb to open is being used with the noun mind. In this case, we are not
talking about literally opening your mind, but in the sense of becoming able to
consider different ideas and perspectives. The opposite, as you may infer, is the
verb to close in this case too.
Closing your mind to new ideas would be very detrimental to the planning process,
as a lot of time would be wasted with the same mistakes.
The act of planning takes a considerable amount of time, and it is extremely
important that the whole team get involved and be aware of their role in the crisis
management process.
From this perspective, we can also say that:
In this sentence, we have the construction will be able to, which is used to talk
about the team’s capacity to do something in the future. Here, we could replace will
be able to with the modal verb can. The difference is that, by using this construction,
we are making it clear we are referring to a future moment; can could indicate
capability both in the present or in the future.
In the previous sentence, we also have two verbs commonly used in the context of
crisis. Check them out:
to stifle to increase
conter / diminuir os efeitos aumentar
First, the verb to stifle. It means to stop something from happening or developing.
It can be a synonym for the verb to restrain. Both verbs are commonly used in the
context of crisis management, because its purpose is exactly to stop or prevent the
effects of a crisis from happening.
Second, the verb to increase, which means to become larger in number, amount,
or degree.
From this verb we can form an adjective by adding the suffix -ing. Take a look:
By increasing number of species, we can understand that the number of new species is
growing. Note that, here, increasing is an adjective characterizing the word number, not a
verb.
As we have just learned, it is crucial to be attentive to the context in which the words
are being used to understand their function in the sentence. Therefore, we can better
understand the different possibilities the words offer and grasp the message a bit better.
This is actually comparable to sports and games: the more we practice, the better we get.
Sports, games and business are competitive environments that may intertwine on many
occasions. If we think about it, in addition to the need for practice, they all demand good
strategies to achieve success.
To support this idea, take a look at the following analogy between a crisis management
plan and a chess match:
The experienced players know the rules, understand the moves, and use the
right strategies to counterattack their opponents.
Os jogadores experientes conhecem as regras, entendem os movimentos, e usam as
estratégias certas para contra-atacar os seus adversários.
First, note the word moves, the plural of the noun move. In the context of a chess match,
it refers to a decision you make by changing the position of the pieces so as to win the
game. In the context of crisis management, it refers to the actions and measures you
decide to take to either prevent a crisis or solve it.
Another word worth mentioning is strategies, the plural of the noun strategy. It means
a planned series of actions to achieve something, commonly used in sports, games, and
business as well. Note that the plural form has -ies at the end. That happens because
strategy ends in consonant + -y.
Now, let’s take a closer look at the verbs used in this sentence:
VERBS
to understand to know
entender / compreender saber / conhecer
The verbs to understand and to know may seem similar in meaning, but there
is a slight difference between them. To know means to have information about
something, while to understand goes beyond that, as it means to realize or
comprehend this information.
Therefore, we can say that one could know something, but not interpret
the information, that is, not understand it. And that would bring about bad
consequences, both in a match and in a business situation, whether it is related to
a crisis scenario or not.
Since we are making this analogy between the crisis management action plan
and a chess match, we can also draw a parallel and call the team members
players. Take a look at the following question:
PREFERENCE
preferência
In this question, we are using the structure would rather, which conveys the idea
of preference. Note that it is referring to a hypothetical situation.
Here, we are asking about the preference regarding being one of two kinds of
players: the newbie, who is someone who has just started something, and the
experienced player, which refers to someone who has the skills or knowledge
acquired from doing something often or for a long time. Note that the word
newbie is a noun, while experienced is an adjective characterizing the noun
player.
When we talk about sports and games, we usually use informal language, and
there are some specific informal nouns we can use to refer to the different kinds
of players. Take a look at some examples:
fish
peixe
Rookie or fish also refer to new and unexperienced players. Note that the word
fish is not being used with its literal meaning, which refers to an aquatic animal.
In the corporate world, it means new in the sense of being unexperienced.
When we want to talk about an experienced player, there is another informal
term we can use. Check it out:
shark
pessoa muito experiente / tubarão
Shark is very common in poker and also in the business world, meaning someone
who has a lot of experience. This analogy makes sense when we think of the
new player as a fish in the ocean, being more vulnerable, as opposed to the
experienced player as a real shark, a bigger and more dangerous animal.
Now you know some vocabulary related to planning and taking action, as
well as some collocations and word families. You have also learned terms
related to the corporate world and sports and games.
Part 3.
Activities
A. Number the columns according to the translation of the words.
B. Fill in the blanks with the appropriate words according to the translation.
6. increasing
3. strategies
5. open
4. stifle
11. to understand
increases.
9. to plan
Uma equipe bem treinada será capaz de conter a crise antes que ela aumente.
Part 4.
AFFIRMATIVE FORM
AFFIRMATIVE FORM
Simple Present
Here, we have the subject the experienced player, which corresponds to the
subject pronoun of the third person singular, the main verb conjugated according
to the subject as understands, and the complement the moves of the opponents.
Note that the main verb ends in -s due to the conjugation rules for the third
person singular.
On the other hand, sentences with other verb forms or with modal verbs do have
an auxiliary verb in their basic structure. That is because modal verbs behave
as auxiliary verbs. That is the case of the modal verb will. Take a look at the
following example:
AFFIRMATIVE FORM
Modal Verb Will
Here, we have an affirmative sentence with the modal verb will. So, we have the
subject the rookies, followed by the modal verb will, the main verb in the base
form need, and the complement to learn the strategies while playing. Note that
the structure is: subject, an auxiliary verb, will, in this case, followed by the main
verb and the complement.
In the last chapter, we learned that the modal verb will conveys the idea of
intentionality or inevitability in the future. However, each modal verb conveys a
specific meaning, and they imprint a certain mood on the main verb.
With that in mind, let’s take a look at another modal verb: would. One of its
functions is to form hypotheses. For example:
AFFIRMATIVE FORM
Modal Verb Would
In this sentence, we have the subject a potential source of risk, followed by the
modal verb would, the main verb in the base form be, and the complement an
accounting error causing financial loss to a client. The structure we use here with
would in the affirmative form is the same as the one we learned with the modal
verb will, that is: subject + auxiliary verb + main verb + complement. Would
takes the place of the auxiliary verb.
Notice that we are using would to raise a hypothesis. In this sense, would can be
understood as the past of will. Compare:
AFFIRMATIVE FORM
hypothesis
hipótese
certainty
certeza
In the first previous sentence, we have the subject Flynn, followed by the modal
verb would, the main verb in the base form love, and the complement to work in
this company. Here, we are using would to talk about a hypothetical, imaginary
situation. We are supposing that the subject, Flynn, would love to work in a
certain company. We cannot say he will in fact work there someday; however, in
our imagination, if he did, he would love it.
In the second previous example, we have the same structure. However, note that
by using will we are talking about a future event that is quite likely to happen in
reality, based on our opinion. It is not a hypothesis anymore. When we say that,
we can assume that Flynn is going to start working in the company, and we think
he is going to love to do that.
As you can see, would is used to talk about hypothetical situations. But it can
also be used to talk about habits in the past. Check it out:
AFFIRMATIVE FORM
Modal Verb Would
The previous sentence follows the same basic structure as the one seen before.
Note that it refers to something that used to happen regularly, a past habit. That
means that someone’s boss used to give good advice in the past, even though
this past is not specified.
We can also use would in some specific expressions, as it is the case of would
rather. It is used to state preferences. Take a look:
WOULD RATHER
preferences
preferências
We start the sentence with would, followed by the subject you, and the word
rather, forming would you rather. Then, comes the main verb in the base form,
which is the verb to be, and the complement, a newbie or an experienced player.
In this case, note we are using or between the two options available.
Now, let’s see how this expression works in a sentence in the affirmative form:
AFFIRMATIVE FORM
Would Rather
preferences
preferências
Here, we have the subject I, followed by would rather, the main verb in the base
form stick, and the complement to a plan than improvise. Note the word than
used here to compare one situation to another one; in this case, to stick to a plan
and to improvise. That being said, we can say that the person is stating their
preference. The contracted form I’d rather is also possible, but it is more used in
informal contexts. It can be applied to any subject.
Another possible use for the modal verb would is to give an opinion or a
suggestion in a very polite way. For example:
AFFIRMATIVE FORM
Modal Verb Would
opinion / suggestion
opinião / sugestão
In the previous example, the speaker is suggesting that Jack buy a new computer.
We use the expression it would be better to do something to nicely suggest
that something needs to be done. The subject pronoun it will always be the
subject in this expression, with an impersonal function. It means that it does not
refer to a specific thing, animal, or idea. It is only part of the sentence because, in
English, verbs must be preceded by a subject.
There is also another way to make a suggestion, but more emphatically, when
using another modal verb: must. This modal verb may be used to imply a strong
recommendation. Take a look:
AFFIRMATIVE FORM
Modal Verb Must
strong recommendation
forte recomendação
Here, we have the subject the managers, followed by the modal verb must, the
main verb in the base form be, and the complement open to suggestions. As
you can see, the sentence structure is the same as with any other modal verb.
However, in the previous sentence, we are using must to talk about what we
consider an appropriate attitude that managers need to have. It is a strong
recommendation about what should be done.
Let’s see another example:
AFFIRMATIVE FORM
Modal Verb Must
strong recommendation
forte recomendação
Notice that the structure is the same: we have the subject a company, the
modal verb must, followed by the main verb in the base form act, and the
complement according to the market. In this sentence, we are talking about
the way a company needs to do something, that is, we are expressing a strong
recommendation as well.
Moreover, must can be used to convey the idea of obligation. Take a look:
AFFIRMATIVE FORM
Modal Verb Must
obligation
obrigação
In this sentence, we have the same structure, but a different use of the modal
verb must. It is clear that we are talking about an obligation, especially when it
comes to being in conformity with the law.
AFFIRMATIVE FORM
Modal Verb Can
Note that the sentence is formed in the same structure: we have the subject
various possible sources of crisis, followed by the modal verb can, the main verb
strike in the base form, and the complement a company. In this sentence, we
are using the modal verb can to convey the possibility of many different kinds of
crises affecting the company.
Take a look at another example:
AFFIRMATIVE FORM
Modal Verb Can
In the previous sentence, we are using can to express the possibility of the team
collaborating with the development of the action plan.
In addition to the idea of possibility, the modal verb can conveys capability or
ability in the present or in the future, depending on the context. Check it out:
AFFIRMATIVE FORM
Modal Verb Can
capability / ability
capacidade / habilidade
Once again, the structure does not change: we have the subject Joseph, followed
by the modal verb can, the main verb in the base form fix, and the complement
his computer by himself. In this sentence, can implies that Joseph has the ability
or skills to fix his own computer, that is, he is capable of doing it.
Another way of saying the same thing is using be able to. Observe:
TO BE ABLE + TO + VERB
capability / ability
capacidade / habilidade
Here, the subject is a well-trained team, followed by the modal verb will, the main
verb in the base form be, and the complement able to stifle the crisis. We are
obviously referring to the future because we are using will.
However, keep in mind that it is a matter of speaker’s choice, as we could also say:
In the previous sentence, we are using the modal verb can to talk about ability or
capability. However, it is not that obvious if we are referring to the future or to
this very moment in the present. It will mostly depend on the context.
Up until now, we have seen sentences in the affirmative form, whether there
is a need to use an auxiliary verb or not. Now, let’s move forward and talk about
another structure: the negative form.
As a rule, to form the negative, we add the particle not. We just have to be
attentive to its position in the sentence.
To form negative sentences with the verb to be in the simple present, we add
the particle not right after the main verb. So, we can say:
NE GATIVE FORM
Simple Present – Verb To Be
In this example, we have the subject my favorite restaurant, followed by the main
verb to be conjugated according to the subject as is, the particle not, and the
complement open today. Note that the structure here is subject + main verb +
not + complement.
It is also possible to use the contracted form and say:
NE GATIVE FORM
Simple Present – Verb To Be
Isn’t is the contracted form of is + the particle not. It is important to mention that
contracted forms are less formal and less emphatic. As you can see, the other
parts of the sentence are not altered.
Now, when it comes to the simple present of all other verbs, we need to add the
auxiliary verb do and the particle not before the main verb. Take a look:
NE GATIVE FORM
Simple Present – Other Verbs
Here, we have the subject I, followed by the auxiliary verb do, and the particle
not. We can also use the contracted form, which, in this case, is don’t. Then, we
have the main verb in the base form believe, and the complement, Sarah.
Note that we must use an auxiliary verb in this case. It will be conjugated,
becoming does, in the third person singular. For all the other persons of the
discourse, we are going to use do. The main verb will always come in the base
form, regardless of the subject.
We also use the particle not to make negative sentences in the present
continuous. As you have already learned, this verb form already has an auxiliary
verb: to be. In the negative form, we simply add not right after the auxiliary and
before the main verb in the -ing form. Take a look:
NE GATIVE FORM
Present Continuous
In this sentence, we have the subject Katya, the auxiliary verb to be conjugated
in the present according to the subject as is, the negative particle not, the main
verb in the -ing form planning, and the complement to change the delivery
schedule. The contracted form of the auxiliary and the particle not is also
possible here: in this case, is + not becomes isn’t.
So far, we have seen two general structures for the negative form: one without
an auxiliary verb and the other one with an auxiliary verb. Because modal verbs
work as auxiliary verbs, we will use the second general structure, and add the
particle not between the modal verb and the main verb.
It is worth mentioning that the main verb always comes in the base form when
we are using modal verbs. Take a look:
NE GATIVE FORM
Modal Verb Will
Here, we have the subject Jennifer, the modal verb will, the particle not, the main
verb in the base form fire, and the complement Emma. Here, the idea is that
something will not happen in the future.
Will not can also be used in the contracted form as won’t. Keep in mind that
contracted forms are usually used in spoken language, in informal contexts, and
are also less emphatic.
With the modal verb would, we keep the same structure. For example:
NE GATIVE FORM
Modal Verb Would
We have the subject Trixie, followed by the modal verb would, which takes
the place of the auxiliary verb, then the particle not, the main verb in the base
form create, and the complement such a bad project. In this case, we have
a hypothetical idea in the negative form. Would not can also be used in the
contracted form as wouldn’t.
However, the negative form of would rather, used specifically to state
preferences, follows a slightly different structure. Check it out:
Notice that the particle not comes after the word rather, not right after the
modal verb would, as it is in the other cases. The idea in this sentence is to
point out the preference of not doing something. It is also possible to use the
contracted form here, which is I’d rather not.
The modal verbs can and must follow the same general structure we have
learned for other modal verbs in the negative form. Cannot implies incapability
or inability to do something, as well as the impossibility of something
happening.
NE GATIVE FORM
Modal Verb Can
prohibition
proibição
In this example, we have the subject you, followed by the modal verb can, the
particle not, the main verb in the base form enter, and the complement this room.
Here, we are expressing a prohibition by saying one cannot enter a certain area.
Cannot is the full negative form, written as a single word, and it is more emphatic
than its contracted form can’t.
On the other hand, must not sounds more emphatic than cannot. Observe:
NE GATIVE FORM
Modal Verb Must
outright prohibition
proibição expressa
In this case, we are saying that entering the room is expressly prohibited. The
contracted form is also possible here: mustn’t.
Notice that, when we choose to use must not or mustn’t to convey a prohibition,
we tend to sound a lot more emphatic than if we used cannot or can’t. And that
happens despite the sentence structure, which remains the same.
GRAMMAR GUIDE
Part 5.
Activities
A. Change the sentences into the negative form.
Part 1.
In this chapter, you will learn how to form words using suffixes and prefixes,
some adverbs and frequently used verbs within the crisis context. You will also
see important vocabulary and grammar topics to make it happen.
Now look at the script of Carrying out the Plan.
So, you’ve raised potential sources of a crisis, measured the risks, came
out with an action plan, and told everyone what to do. However, your
work is not done yet…
The day when you will need to put the crisis management plan into
action will eventually come. Since everything has been previously laid
down and the employees have been advised, all it takes is to follow the
plan step-by-step and get smoothly through the crisis, right?
Wrong! As detailed as your crisis management plan may be, it will never
be able to predict exactly what the future holds. A crisis is essentially an
unforeseen event. And to address it, besides being very attentive to the
reasons that caused the problem, the company must seek appropriate
solutions.
Let’s assume that a phone company had a problem within its network,
causing the outage of service to all customers in a certain area of the
city. The crisis committee will quickly assign technicians and experts
to solve the problem that brought the network down. Meanwhile, the
committee will also monitor the customers’ responses. In case a surge
of complaints should arise, swift action will be essential so that the
problem does not blemish the company’s image.
When we track the crisis closely, it’s possible to respond to events a lot
faster and prevent the crisis from growing. To make this possible, the
committee should guide the rest of the company’s employees through
the crisis. Going back to our telecommunication company example, the
crisis committee should tell customer care how to respond to clients
who are calling to complain about the signal outage. The committee
can also establish compensation to damaged customers, while closely
supervising technicians who are in charge of fixing the network
problems.
But what if the crisis lingers for a long time, despite all the planning and
all the actions that have been taken?
By the way, do you remember when we said that every crisis brings
opportunities?
Errado! Por mais detalhado que seja seu plano de gestão de crise, ele
nunca será capaz de prever exatamente o que o futuro reserva. Uma
crise é essencialmente um evento imprevisto. E, para enfrentá-la, além
de a empresa estar bem atenta aos motivos que causaram o problema,
ela deve buscar as soluções adequadas.
Part 2.
So far, we have learned words from different classes within the context of crisis
management. We have also learned word families, collocations, and even some
terms that can be used both in the corporate environment and in sports and
games.
In the previous chapter, we mentioned the collocation to carry out a plan – that
is, to execute a plan – which is exactly the title of this lesson. We have also
discussed the importance of having a well-trained team to put the plan into
action.
After all, we plan and prepare the team to take action. Take a look:
The day when you will need to put your crisis management plan into
action will eventually come.
Em algum momento, chegará o dia em que você precisará colocar em
prática o plano de gestão de crise.
In this sentence, we are talking about the time to put a plan into action. Here, we
are using the word when to refer to a moment in time, and we can note it refers to a
future event due to the use of the modal verb will.
Here, we also have the word eventually, which is an adverb. Adverbs are words
that modify a verb, an adjective, or another adverb. Take a look at some examples:
ADVERBS
eventually
finalmente / no fim das contas / cedo ou tarde
ultimately
no fim / no fim das contas
Eventually conveys the idea that something happens, happened or will happen
after a long time, even though we cannot tell exactly when. Note that this adverb
is formed by the word eventual and the suffix -ly. Since eventual ends in -l,
eventually ends with a double -L in -lly.
There are also other adverbs that have a similar meaning and that can replace
eventually in some cases. Sooner or later conveys the idea that something will
surely happen, although we cannot be sure when; finally expresses the idea that
something happens at the end of a series of things – it comes from the word final
and the suffix -ly; and ultimately conveys the idea that something is going to
happen after a series of things is done and considered – it comes from the word
ultimate and the suffix -ly. Note that, in this last adverb, there is no double -L,
since ultimate ends with an -e.
In the context of the previous example, these adverbs would imply that things
have not happened yet, but will almost certainly happen at some point in the
future. When we want to say that something has happened or is happening
around the present, we can use another adverb. Have a look:
ADVERB S
lately / recently
ultimamente / recentemente
Lately refers to something that has happened for some time. It is frequently used
to talk about the recent past, that is, a short time before the present. Recently is
another adverb that conveys the same idea.
The adverbs we have just seen can help us to understand the period of time we
are talking about, such as the recent past or the future, for example.
When talking about the future in the context of crises, it is important to bear in
mind that even though we put all our attention and effort on the planning step, it
is impossible to be a hundred percent sure of what will eventually come ahead.
Take a look:
Here, we have may be, used to express the probability of the crisis management
plan being detailed or not. We also have will be able to to talk about ability in the
future. We could also use the modal verb can in this case. However, if we used
can here, it would not be so clear that we are necessarily referring to the future –
as we saw in the last chapter.
Note the use of the word never. It is another adverb of time, which conveys the
idea of not at any time, or not once.
There is also a verb in this sentence that is interesting to address. Check it out:
VERBS
to predict / to foresee
prever
Here, we have the verb to predict, which means to say that something will
happen before it actually happens.
A synonym for this verb is the verb to foresee, which means to know or think
that something will happen at some point in the future. Note that this verb is
formed by the prefix fore-, which means something that happens in advance,
plus the verb to see. Thus, to foresee is to see in advance.
We must have in mind that we will not be able to predict when a crisis and all its
consequences will arise. As much as we learn how to recognize some signs of a
potential crisis before it actually happens, we cannot predict all of its aspects. In
other words:
FORESEEN ≠ UNFORESEEN
previsto ≠ não previsto, imprevisto
ADVERB FORMATION
adjective adverb
essential essentially
essencial essencialmente
basic basically
básico / fundamental basicamente
First, we have the adverb essentially, formed by the adjective essential and the
suffix -ly.
The next one is the adverb basically, which has a closer meaning to that of
essentially. It is formed by the adjective basic plus the suffix -ally.
The suffix -ally is often used to form adverbs from adjectives ending in -ic. Take a
look:
ADVERB FORMATION
adjective adverb
historic historically
histórico historicamente
dramatic dramatically
dramático dramaticamente
ADVERB FORMATION
adjective adverb
public publicly
público publicamente
The adjective publicly comes from the adjective public. Even though the adjective
public ends in -ic, we add the suffix -ly to form the adverb. We do not use the suffix
-ally in this case.
Now, it is important to understand the difference between an adverb and an
adjective. As we have already mentioned, adverbs modify verbs, adjectives and
other adverbs, whereas adjectives modify nouns.
It is interesting that we realize how a simple addition of a suffix or a prefix can
completely change the function and the meaning of a given word.
Take a look at the following sentence, in which we can find other examples of this:
TO OVERSEE
monitorar / supervisionar
First, we have the word establishment, which is a noun that here means the
process of starting or creating something. This word is formed by the verb to
establish, which is to institute something, and the suffix -ment.
Here, we also have the adjective essential, which we have just mentioned as the
root of the adverb essentially. Moreover, notice the verb to oversee, which means to
supervise. It is formed by the prefix over- and the verb to see.
The prefix over- is commonly used with verbs to convey the idea of an excess, of
something that goes beyond the expected or necessary. Let’s check it out with some
examples formed with this same prefix:
PREFIX OVER-
to overdo to overcook
fazer algo em excesso cozinhar demais
to overreact
reagir de forma exagerada
PREFIX OVER-
to overachieve
alcançar além do esperado / ser mais bem sucedido do que o esperado
to overpay
pagar mais do que o esperado ou acordado
To overachieve is formed with the verb to achieve, and means to do more than
is expected or be more successful than others, especially by working hard. And
we also have to overpay, which comes from the verb pay, and means to pay
more than expected or agreed.
In all the previous examples, we have the prefix over- added to a verb, conveying
the idea of an action that happens in an exaggerated way.
But beware: when it comes to the verb to overlook, for example, the prefix over-
may convey a different meaning. Observe the following sentence:
TO OVERLOOK
ignorar / deixar de ver
Even though to overlook is another verb formed with the same prefix, it means
to miss or to not notice something important. It has nothing to do with
exaggeration. As you can see, sometimes words formed with prefixes also need
to be understood based on the context.
There is also the prefix under-, which implies the opposite idea as that of over-.
It conveys that something is done with less intensity or quality than expected.
Check out some examples:
PREFIX UNDER-
to underdo
fazer menos do que o necessário ou esperado
to underreact
reagir de modo menos intenso do que o apropriado
to undercook
cozinhar menos que o necessário
PREFIX UNDER-
to underachieve
ter nível / resultado abaixo do esperado
to underpay
pagar menos do que o necessário
to undersee
TO LINGER
perdurar / insistir em continuar da mesma forma desagradável
Here, we start the question with what if, which is used to ask about something
that could happen in the future. Also, note that we use the verb to linger, which
means to continue to exist for longer than usual, to endure. One of the uses
of this verb is to express the idea that something unpleasant persists, as in the
context of crisis.
If you look it up in a dictionary, you will find that to linger can also be a synonym
of other verbs, such as to remain and to stay.
Nonetheless, these three verbs – to linger, to remain and to stay – are slightly
different from each other. To remain and to stay mean to continue to be in the
same state or condition, but they do not imply a negative connotation, as to
linger can imply.
Sometimes, to remain and to stay can also be interchangeable. For example:
TO REMAIN / TO STAY
permanecer / continuar
In this case, we are using the verb to remain or to stay to talk about continuing to be
in the same state, in this case, open to suggestions. Here, both verbs have the same
meaning; however, we could not use to linger in this sentence, since a negative idea of
continuity would be inconsistent.
On the other hand, if we want to say we will continue to be in a place for some time,
then, we could use any of the three verbs. Take a look:
Karen wants to stay / remain outside the hotel in the hope of seeing her idol
leave.
Karen quer permanecer do lado de fora do hotel na esperança de ver seu ídolo
sair.
Karen wants to linger outside the hotel in the hope of seeing her idol leave.
Karen quer permanecer/“fazer hora” do lado de fora do hotel na esperança de
ver seu ídolo sair.
In this case, the verb to linger conveys the idea that the period she is going to
spend outside the hotel is much longer. If we used the verbs to stay and to
remain, we would convey a more pleasant idea of permanence.
When we talk about a crisis, we do not want it to stay nor remain, let alone linger.
But there is still a possibility that the crisis will continue.
Having said that, maybe it will be necessary to guide people on what to do and
how to act during some time.
First, it is worth mentioning that the verb to guide can be used in a collocation
referring to both physical spaces and situations. We can use this collocation in
the sense of helping someone or something to physically move in a particular
direction. For example:
I’ll guide you through the streets with the best bars in the city.
Vou guiá-los pelas ruas com os melhores bares na cidade.
Here, we are using the collocation to guide someone through something to talk
about orientation in places and physical spaces. In this sentence, we are using guide
you through the streets to talk about giving directions to get to a certain place.
But we could also use the same collocation meaning helping someone in a
particular situation or moment. Check it out:
TO PRE VENT
evitar / prevenir
When we track the crisis closely, it’s possible to respond to events a lot
faster and prevent the crisis from growing.
Quando monitoramos a crise de perto, podemos responder aos eventos muito
mais rapidamente e evitar que a crise cresça.
Here, the sentence begins with when, which we mentioned at the beginning of the present
chapter, to refer to a moment in a timeline when something takes place. In this case, it is the
moment we track a crisis. The verb to track means to monitor or to observe.
There are also two adverbs worth highlighting in the previous sentence: closely and quickly.
Closely comes from the adjective close and the suffix -ly, and means very carefully; and
quickly, means fast, and is formed by the adjective quick and the suffix -ly.
Now, let’s take a closer look at the verb to prevent. In the context of the previous example, it
means to stop something from happening.
In some contexts, to prevent can also have a meaning similar to that of to avoid. For example:
In the previous example, to prevent or to avoid mean the same thing: to stop something from
happening, in this case, to stop serious accidents from happening.
However, in different contexts, they are not interchangeable. Take a look:
Laila has to avoid excessive salt. She has high blood pressure.
Laila tem que evitar o excesso de sal. Ela tem pressão alta.
In the previous sentence, we are using to avoid to point out that Laila needs to stay away from
salt. In this context, the verb to prevent could not be used because we are not talking about
something that should be stopped from happening. Here, a synonym for to avoid would be to
keep away from, or to keep a distance from.
Now you know that there are verbs that can be used with
the same meaning in certain contexts but not in others. You
have also learned the use of adverbs, and how some verbs and
adverbs are formed with suffixes and prefixes.
Part 3.
Activities
A. Number the columns according to the translation of the words.
( 3 ) historicamente ( ) to undercook
B. Fill in the blanks with the appropriate words according to the translation:
3. Karen wants to outside the hotel in the hope of seeing her idol leave.
Karen quer permanecer do lado de fora do hotel na esperança de ver seu ídolo sair.
4. The committee should the rest of the company’s employees through the crisis.
O comitê deve orientar o restante dos colaboradores da empresa durante a crise.
Part 4.
In the previous chapters, you have learned some verb forms to talk about present and future
events, as well as how to use some modal verbs.
To do so, we have approached the existence of three basic structures in English – the
affirmative, negative and interrogative forms –, and have discussed two of them: the
affirmative form and the negative form.
Now, we are going to address the third structure, which is used to ask questions: the
interrogative form.
As its basic structure with the verb to be in the simple present, we have main verb + subject +
complement. For example:
INTERROGATIVE FORM
Simple Present – Verb To Be
Here, we start the sentence with the main verb to be conjugated in the simple present
according to the subject as is. Next, we have the subject Carl, and the complement a marketing
manager. Note that the simple present is used to talk about facts, routines, habits and events in
the present.
Also note that, as well as in the affirmative and negative forms, we do not add an auxiliary verb
to build sentences with the verb to be when it is the main verb. The only change that happens
compared to the affirmative and negative forms is the inversion of the verb position in the
structure.
It is important to remember that the main verb in this structure must be conjugated according
to the subject. In the case of the verb to be, we have am for the first person singular I; are
for the second persons singular and plural you, for the first person plural we, and for the third
person plural they; and, finally, we have is for the third persons singular he, she and it.
When it comes to other verbs in the interrogative form of the simple present, we must use an
auxiliary verb, do, which must be conjugated according to the subject. The main verb will not
be conjugated, remaining in the base form.
Now the structure is slightly different: auxiliary verb + subject + main verb + complement.
Check it out:
INTERROGATIVE FORM
Simple Present – Other Verbs
In the previous example, we have the auxiliary verb do, followed by the subject
you, the main verb in the base form have, and the complement plans for the
future of the company. Note that the auxiliary verb do is conjugated according to
the subject you. Keep in mind that, when it comes to the third person singular,
this auxiliary verb is conjugated as does.
In the present continuous, the auxiliary verb to be is part of the structure in all
forms, be it affirmative, negative, or interrogative.
So, the affirmative form will be subject + auxiliary verb + main verb +
complement. In the negative, we simply add not after the auxiliary verb. And in
the interrogative form, we invert the auxiliary verb with the subject. Observe:
INTERROGATIVE FORM
Present Continuous
So, the general interrogative structure for all modal verbs is:
INTERROGATIVE FORM
Modal Verbs
INTERROGATIVE FORM
Modal Verb Will
request
solicitação
Here, we have the modal verb will, followed by the subject you, the main verb in
the base form take, and the complement, this document to the manager’s office,
please. It is a polite way to make a request, that is, we are using will to ask
someone to take a document somewhere. When using will to make a request,
we normally use the word please at the end of the question.
We could also use the modal verb would to make the same request; however, it
would sound more formal. Check it out:
INTERROGATIVE FORM
Modal Verb Would
formal request
solicitação formal
In the previous example, we have the modal verb would, the subject you, the
main verb in the base form take, followed by the complement this document
to the manager’s office, please. By using would, even though we are asking the
same thing, the intention is different from the one with will, as it is more formal.
Also note that even though there is a slight difference in tone, both modal verbs
follow the same general structure.
The modal verb must is not commonly used in the interrogative form, except in
specific situations, such as to confirm an obligation or to ask about something
that is expected to be done. Take a look at the following example:
INTERROGATIVE FORM
Modal Verb Must
confirmation of an obligation
confirmação de uma obrigação
The idea in the previous question is that an obligation or something that should
be done was already known, and a confirmation is being requested.
When it comes to the modal verb can, it is possible to ask questions about ability,
possibility, to make requests, or to ask for permission. For example:
INTERROGATIVE FORM
Modal Verb Can
In the previous example, we have the modal verb can, the subject I, the main
verb in the base form turn, followed by the complement the lights on. In this
context, we are asking for permission to turn on the lights.
In order to ask for permission, we can also use the modal verb may. However, it
will sound considerably more formal and polite. Check it out:
INTERROGATIVE FORM
Modal Verb May
permission (formal)
permissão (formal)
In the previous example, we are also asking for permission to turn on the lights,
but in a much more formal tone. Note that the structure of the interrogative form
is the same.
It is important to mention that context makes all the difference to understand
the different uses of the modal verbs and the ideas they convey, be it in
interrogative, affirmative or negative sentences.
For example, we have just seen the modal verb may being used to ask for
permission in an interrogative sentence. However, this modal verb can also be
used to talk about probability. Take a look:
probability
probabilidade
In the former statement, we used may to convey the idea of a probability of having
a thorough crisis management plan. Note that this is an affirmative sentence, and
does not convey the idea of permission.
Take a look at another example:
probability
probabilidade
The solution in this scenario may be to work with some kind of relay.
A solução, neste cenário, pode ser trabalhar com algum tipo de revezamento.
The previous sentence is in the affirmative form. So, we have the subject the
solution in this scenario, followed by the modal verb may, the main verb in the base
form be, and the complement to work with some kind of relay. Note that we are
using the modal verb may to talk about probability, that is, something that is likely
to happen.
It is worth highlighting the difference between may be – which is the structure
modal verb + main verb in the base form – and maybe – which is an adverb. For
example:
MAY BE ≠ MAYBE
Maybe the solution in this scenario is to work with some kind of relay.
Talvez a solução, neste cenário, seja trabalhar com algum tipo de revezamento.
Here, we are also talking about a probability, and we started the sentence with the
adverb maybe. Then, we have the subject the solution in this scenario, and the main
verb to be conjugated according to the subject as is. The structure, in this case, is that of
a sentence in the affirmative form of the verb to be in the simple present, that is, there
is no modal verb in this sentence. So, even though may and maybe can both be used to
imply probability, their uses in the sentence are totally different.
In the negative form, the modal verb may will convey lack of probability or lack of
permission, depending on the context. Check it out:
NE GATIVE FORM
Modal Verb May
The solution in this scenario may not be to work with some kind of relay.
A solução, neste cenário, pode não ser trabalhar com algum tipo de revezamento.
As you can see, the sentence structure is the same as that of the negative form of other
modal verbs. It is also worth mentioning that, even though there is a contracted form for
may in the negative form – mayn’t –, it is not commonly used.
Now, check out the following sentence in the negative form with the adverb maybe:
MAY BE ≠ MAYBE
Maybe the solution in this scenario isn’t to work with some kind of relay.
Talvez a solução, neste cenário, não seja trabalhar com algum tipo de revezamento.
Now, we have the adverb maybe, followed by the subject the solution in this scenario,
and the main verb to be conjugated according to the subject as is. Note that, since it is a
negative sentence, we also have the particle not after the main verb, in this case, in the
contracted form, isn’t. The idea of probability is expressed through the adverb maybe.
Therefore, the adverb maybe also conveys the idea of probability, but within a different
structure than that of the modal verb may also in the negative.
Furthermore, the meaning and use of the modal verb may can also be quite close to those
of the modal verb can. However, there is a subtle difference between them.
We use the modal verb can to talk about possibility, that is, something that is not
impossible to happen. With the modal verb may, we are talking about probability, that is,
there is a fifty-fifty chance of something happening. This happens based on evidence in
the speech.
Check out the following example:
possibility
possibilidade
In the previous sentence, we are using the modal verb can to talk about the
possibility of the manager calling us. It means that he can do that if he wants to.
It is not an impossible situation, but we do not have evidence to think he will or
will not call.
Now, take a look:
probability
probabilidade
Here, with the modal verb may, it is implicit that there is a probability or a fifty-
percent chance that the manager will call. That means we should be prepared for
that because the chances of that happening are real, based on the evidence we
have.
The difference in the concepts of possibility and probability may be hard to
grasp in real-life situations. So, it is important to always pay attention to the
context.
In addition to the modal verbs may and can, we have also learned how to talk
about obligations using the modal verb must, how to talk about future events
using will, and how to talk about hypotheses, habits in the past, preferences
and suggestions using would. Now, take a look at another modal verb: should.
We can use should to give an opinion, make a recommendation or give advice, using
the same structure we have seen with other modal verbs. Check out the example:
AFFIRMATIVE FORM
Modal Verb Should
recommendation
recomendação
Here, we have the subject the committee, the modal verb should followed by the
main verb in the base form guide, and the complement the rest of the company’s
employees through the crisis. We are using should to make a recommendation, that
is, we are suggesting that something needs to be done.
In the negative form, should can be used to make recommendations or give advice
about what is not right or sensible to be done. Take a look:
NE GATIVE FORM
Modal Verb Should
recommendation
recomendação
Here, we have the subject you, followed by the modal verb should, the particle
not, the main verb in the base form stick, and the complement to this plan.
We are using the negative form to recommend what is not right or sensible to
do. See that we are using the collocation stick to a plan, which we saw in the
previous chapter. Within this context, the explanation is that this plan is full of
gaps, and that is why it is not right to stick to it.
We can also use the contracted form, shouldn’t. It would sound less emphatic
and more natural in spoken language than the full form.
Should can also be used to talk about something we deduce, based on evidence
or previous experiences.
DE GREES OF PROBABILIT Y
Should - 70% Chance
deduction
dedução
Here, we use should with the intention of expressing a deduction based on our
previous experience, that is, a seventy percent chance of happening. Since I am
used to the manager giving feedback the day after I hand him a project, I suppose
it is quite certain that it will happen at present time.
We could also make a deduction using the modal verb may, but conveying an
idea of lower probability. Take a look:
DE GREES OF PROBABILIT Y
May - 50% Chance
deduction
dedução
MODAL VERBS
Interrogative Form
With this structure, we can ask questions whose answers can be either yes or no.
On the other hand, to know about something specific, we are going to use question
words. In the vocabulary part of this chapter, we mentioned one of them: when,
used to ask about the moment something happens.
Take a look at the following example:
Today is an adverb of time that means at the present moment, this day.
Adverbs of time are words that express the moment something happens.
We can also use when with other modal verbs. For example:
The same way we have answered the previous question, here we have also used
an adverb of time, tomorrow, which is the day after today.
It is also possible to use the present continuous to talk about the future using
when. For instance:
In the previous example, we have the question word when, followed by the auxiliary verb to
be conjugated in the present according to the subject as are, the subject Keith and Joanna, and
the main verb in the -ing form traveling. In this case, a complement is not necessary, and we
are asking a question related to a future event.
To answer this question, we could say:
ADVERBS OF TIME
Here, we have a sentence in the affirmative form of the present continuous. So, there is the
subject they, the auxiliary verb to be conjugated in the present according to the subject as are,
the main verb in the -ing form traveling, and the complement tonight. Tonight is an adverb of
time that expresses the near future. It means the same as this night.
We could also use other adverbs to refer to the future. Take a look:
ADVERBS OF TIME
future
futuro
Here, we have tomorrow, which means the day after today, and the day after
tomorrow. We can use both adverbs to refer to the near future.
Check out other examples:
ADVERBS OF TIME
future
futuro
Here, we have next week, which is in a week’s time; next month, which is in
a month’s time; and next year, which is in one year’s time. In this case, we are
providing a longer and more precise deadline.
We can also say in two weeks or two weeks from now when we want to talk about
more than one week from now. Two, which is a cardinal number, can be changed
for any other number to establish other quantities, and weeks can be exchanged for
days, months, years, centuries and so on.
There are yet other adverbs of time regarding the future more vaguely. For example:
ADVERBS OF TIME
future
futuro
In the future conveys an idea that something will happen at a moment, and it is
not very clear if this future is near or not; soon conveys the idea of something
that will happen in the near future, even though we do not know exactly when;
and later conveys the idea of something that will happen in a more distant
future, also without specifying when.
In the grammar section of this chapter, we have learned the structure of the
interrogative form, how to use the modal verbs may and should, in addition
to how to use the question word when and some adverbs of time to talk
about the future. If you want to learn more about these topics, you can refer
to the Grammar Guide section at the end of your book.
GRAMMAR GUIDE
Part 5.
Activities
A. Change the sentences into the affirmative or interrogative forms.
B. Fill in the blanks with the missing words according to the guidelines.
6. the solution in this scenario isn’t to work with some kind of relay.
( probability – adverb)
Talvez a solução, neste cenário, não seja trabalhar com algum tipo de revezamento.
Part 1.
In this chapter, you will learn how to express frequency, how to use some
collocations, as well as some elements of coherence and cohesion. You will also
see important vocabulary and grammar topics to make it happen.
Now look at the script of Clear Communication.
CLEAR COMMUNICATION
One of my friends once told me something quite interesting: “If you want
to spread the word quickly, tell someone about it and say it’s a secret.”
It makes perfect sense because people love to communicate. We are
constantly sharing information and experiences with our friends and family,
especially when the news is either very pleasant or very unpleasant.
That being said, let me ask you something: when a crisis strikes your
company and the customer experience is harmed, how long do you think
it usually takes for the news to spread? Maybe not too long, right?
that it is aware of how this problem affects the quality of the services
provided and that it is working to solve everything as soon as possible.
This shows respect for the customers, who will be more likely to stay
with your company during and after the crisis.
But just a set of nice and beautiful words is not enough. It is necessary
to take concrete actions and communicate how the problem is being
solved and how soon the situation will be back to normal.
Imagine that an online shoe store had a backup issue due to a system
failure, and some orders placed on the website were lost. After the
turmoil, the company recovers the lost orders, but not in time to prevent
a delay in the deliveries. Consequently, to avoid going through this
situation again, the company decides to implement a cutting-edge
IT system, whose protocols end up altering the customer’s shopping
journey. The worst that can happen is a customer having their shopping
experience changed without any explanation whatsoever. This would
definitely increase their level of insecurity and dissatisfaction.
Otherwise, the entire crisis management plan and all the effort in its
implementation will have been in vain.
COMUNICAÇÃO CL ARA
Dito isso, deixe-me perguntar uma coisa: quando uma crise atinge sua
empresa e a experiência do cliente é prejudicada, quanto tempo você
acha que normalmente leva para essa notícia se espalhar? Talvez não
demore muito, certo?
Part 2.
In the previous sentence, note the word constantly, an adverb of frequency that
means all the time or often. It is formed by the adjective constant and the suffix
-ly. As we have seen before, adverbs modify other adverbs, verbs, and adjectives.
Speaking of which, there are two adjectives worth mentioning: pleasant and
unpleasant. They are opposites:
ADJE CTIVES
pleasant ≠ unpleasant
prazeroso / agradável ≠ desagradável
EITHER... OR
ou... ou
Here, we have either French or German expressing that Sheila is going to study
one of these two languages, and not both of them. Note that either comes
before the first alternative, and or, before the second alternative.
In the previous example, we are using French and German as alternatives. They
are nouns. We can also use full sentences as options. Check it out:
EITHER... OR
ou... ou
You can either solve the problem yourself or ask your team for help.
Você pode ou resolver o problema sozinho ou pedir ajuda à sua equipe.
In the previous sentence, the first option – after the word either – is solve the
problem yourself; the second option – introduced by the word or – is ask your
team for help. Note that these are both full sentences. Their subject is implicit
in the second sentence – in the context, it is you, the one who has to make the
choice.
As we have already learned, when we present two alternatives with either... or, it
is implied that only one of these options will be chosen.
To present options from which none of them will be chosen, we use another pair
of connectors: neither... nor. For example:
NEITHER... NOR
nem... nem
Here, we have French after the word neither, and German after the word nor. In
this case, we use neither... nor to say that none of the options will be considered.
Note that this sentence is built with an affirmative structure, because neither...
nor already conveys a negative idea.
Check out another example:
NEITHER... NOR
nem... nem
In this previous sentence, we have neither the beach nor the mountains, which means
that John does not like any of these options.
Neither... nor is also an important element of cohesion and coherence, as it also connects
two ideas, pointing out that none of them will be chosen or will happen.
We can also express another line of reasoning to link two ideas using whether… or. One of
its uses is to express when we don’t know which of the two options to choose. Take a look:
WHE THER... OR
se... ou
They’re not sure whether they’ll choose Vanessa’s or Christian’s action plan.
Eles não estão certos se vão escolher o plano de ação da Vanessa ou do Christian.
Here, we have whether before the first option, Vanessa’s plan, and or introducing the
second option, Christian’s action plan. In this case, we could have used if instead of
whether to convey the same idea, keeping the word or as the second element.
We are using whether... or to express the idea of doubt. Either... or does not convey this
idea.
Another use of whether is in whether… or not, to present two options when the result is
the same regardless of which option gets chosen. For example:
It’s too late to avoid damages. Customers will be harmed whether they
make a decision or not.
É tarde demais para evitar danos. Os clientes serão prejudicados se eles
tomarem uma decisão ou não.
Here, the result is customers being harmed, which will happen regardless of
their decision. So, making a decision or not will have absolutely no impact on the
consequences.
In this construction, we use whether followed by the option they make a
decision, and the rest of the connector, or not, comes at the end of the sentence.
In this case, if can also replace whether, keeping or not at the end.
However, we can also build this sentence in a different way. Take a look:
IF
se
If there are no people willing to pay for your product or service, there is
no reason for your company to exist.
Se não existem pessoas dispostas a pagar pelo seu produto ou serviço,
não há razão para sua empresa existir.
Here, if introduces a condition: there are no people willing to pay for your product
or service. This condition is followed by a consequence: there is no reason for
your company to exist. In this case, we cannot replace if with whether, because
whether does not convey the idea of condition.
It is also worth mentioning that we have there are and there is in the previous
example. They are used to talk about existence. Then, we have the word no,
which conveys the idea of total absence or zero quantity. Here, this quantity
refers to the existing number of people and reasons. By saying no people and no
reason, we are more emphatic on the idea of absence than by using the negative
form with there be.
We also have the word willing in the previous example, which is an adjective.
It means disposed or inclined to do something. It is commonly used in the
collocation to be willing to do something. In the case of the former sentence,
willing to pay. Note that willing is different from the modal verb will.
There are many reasons why a customer does not purchase a product or is not
attracted to it, and one of them is the lack of transparency in communication. In
the meantime, a lot of distorted information can reach these customers, causing
disinterest.
Take a look at the following statement concerning this idea:
gossip rumor
fofoca boato
Gossip is information passed on from one person to the other about people’s
behavior and private lives which is not necessarily true. Rumor is a kind of
unofficial interesting story or piece of news that might be true or invented, and
may quickly spread from person to person.
Gossip and rumor are nouns, and they can form different collocations. Take a
look at some of them:
hot gossip
fofoca muito interessante / fofoca quente
common gossip
fofoca que todo mundo sabe
The most common verb used with the noun gossip is to spread:
to spread gossip
espalhar fofoca
We can also collocate the same verb with rumor and say:
to spread a rumor
espalhar um boato
Here are other verbs that collocate with this very same noun:
Here, we have rumor has it, which is a way to introduce information that came
from a rumor, something that is often being said. Another way of saying this
would be to introduce the information with: it is being said.
In a business context, gossip and rumors usually tend to make customers feel
suspicious. As a result, the circle of negative comments can increase and end up
harming the company.
There is an attitude that can contribute to mitigate this kind of situation.
Take a look:
To appease means to calm down, to soothe. Here, we are talking about calming
down anxious customers, that is, impatient customers. Note that we used can to
convey the idea of a possibility. That implies it is possible to consider measures
that will calm unhappy customers down.
The word customer is a noun that can sometimes be considered the same as
client. However, there is a small difference in use between them in the business
world. Even though these words can be interchangeable depending on the
context, it is good to know the small differences in usage.
Customer is generally someone who buys a product or service from a store or a
service provider. This can be a relationship that happens only once, that does not
happen again or very often. When we think of a store, for example, we usually
refer to the people who shop there as customers.
Client, on the other hand, is a type of customer that acquires a type of service or
assistance from a specialized professional, such as a lawyer or a psychologist,
for example. We assume there is a relationship of trust between the client and
the service provider. And clients usually use the service from the same provider
again and again.
Whether the company’s relationship is with customers or clients, it may be
damaged at some point, causing a crisis to arise.
In this case, there is one consequence that is almost certain:
Here, we are talking about an action that the company may be forced to carry out,
which is to review procedures in order to improve.
At the beginning of the previous example, we have before, an adverb of time
used to indicate that something happened at an earlier time. Note that it comes
after we have said, in the present perfect, which indicates an action that was
carried out in the past.
We also have normally, an adverb of frequency that means usually. Let’s take a
closer look at them:
normally usually
normalmente usualmente
Note that both normally and usually are formed by adding the suffix -ly to their root.
The same goes for the following adverbs of frequency that have similar meanings:
generally commonly
geralmente comumente
Knowing how to express frequency is another way of making our speech clearer
to the listener.
Connectors are other elements that help in the coherence and cohesion of the
speech, thus making it clearer. They help us structure the discourse by linking one
idea to another, making the message more fluid.
Take a look at the following example:
CONNE CTORS
CONNE CTORS
Part 3.
Activities
A. Number the columns according to the translation of the words.
( 9 ) além de ( ) to appease
B. Fill in the blanks with the appropriate words according to the translation:
3. You can solve the problem yourself ask your team for help.
Você pode ou resolver o problema sozinho ou pedir ajuda à sua equipe.
6. , the entire crisis management plan and all the effort in its
implementation will have been in vain.
Do contrário, todo o plano de gestão de crise e o esforço em sua implementação terão sido em vão.
Alternatively / Or
6. Otherwise / Or else / 12. to avoid damages 6. to hear a rumor
5. whether / if 11. to appease 5. to spread gossip
4. neither - nor 10. otherwise 4. common gossip
3. either - or 9. in addition to 3. idle gossip
2. neither - nor 8. rumor has it 2. the latest gossip
1. either - or 7. to deny a rumor 1. hot gossip
Activity B – Answers Activity A – Answers
Part 4.
So far, we have seen the three basic structures for sentences in English: affirmative form,
negative form and interrogative form. We have also seen how there may or may not be an
auxiliary verb in the formation of these sentences, depending on the verb form used.
We have learned that the basic structure of the affirmative form is:
AFFIRMATIVE FORM
Basic Structure
First, we have the subject, followed by a main verb, and then a complement. In this case, we
do not have an auxiliary verb.
We see this structure in affirmative sentences in the simple present, which is used to talk
about facts, routines, habits and to make descriptions. With verbs in the simple present, the
affirmative form does not carry auxiliary verbs, whether the main verb is to be or not.
For verb forms that require an auxiliary verb in the affirmative form, the basic structure is:
AFFIRMATIVE FORM
Basic Structure
First, we have the subject, followed by an auxiliary verb, the main verb, and the
complement.
We have seen the verb to be used as an auxiliary verb in the present continuous,
which refers to planned future and events in progress at the time of the speech.
We have also learned about the modal verbs can, must, will, may and should,
which behave as auxiliaries. Each one of them has a specific use, which can be
to talk about the future, to express possibility and probability, to give advice, to
make assumptions, to give orders and to make prohibitions.
In addition to the verb to be and modal verbs as auxiliary verbs, we have also
learned that do is the auxiliary verb in the simple present when forming negative
and interrogative sentences with verbs other than to be.
There is also another auxiliary verb, to have, which is used in a verb form that we
are going to approach in this chapter: the present perfect.
This verb form is used to talk about events that happened in the past, but that
still have relevance in the present or that started in the past and continue to
happen in the present.
Take a look at a sentence with this verb form:
PRESENT PERFE CT
In the previous example, we have said before is in the present perfect. In this
case, it refers to something that happened in the past, but that is still relevant in
the present.
Note that the structure here is the subject we, followed by the auxiliary verb
have, the main verb said and the complement before. Said is the verb to say in
the past participle. The past participle is used in some verb forms, such as the
present perfect.
To understand how to form the past participle, it is important to know that most
verbs in English are regular. That means we will add -d, -ied or -ed to the end of
their base form. For example:
close closed
fechar fechado
establish established
estabelecer estabelecido
study studied
estudar estudado
The verb to close becomes closed. As it is a verb already ending in -e, we only
add -d to the end. The verb to establish becomes established. As it is a verb
ending in -sh, we add -ed to the end. And the verb to study becomes studied.
Because this verb ends in consonant + y, we subtract -y and add -ied.
There are also irregular verbs, which do not follow any rules in the formation of
the past participle.
Some of them will have completely different spellings and pronunciations
from their base form; others will be written in the same way but pronounced
differently; and there are also some that are written and pronounced the same
way. Take a look at some examples:
say said
falar / dizer falado / dito
pay paid
pagar pago / pagado
To say becomes said, as we have seen in the first example in the present perfect.
The verb to pay has a similar form, and becomes paid in the past participle. As
you can see, there is little change in them.
Check out other examples of irregular verbs:
think thought
pensar pensado
win won
ganhar / vencer ganho / ganhado
draw drawn
traçar / desenhar traçado
In the previous examples, we can see how some verbs are completely different in
the past participle. The verb to think becomes thought, as we saw in an example
in the passive voice in the vocabulary part of this chapter. The verb to win
becomes won. And the verb to draw becomes drawn. We saw this verb within
the collocation to draw up a plan, which means to create or design a plan. In
these cases, the verbs change a lot compared to their base form.
Now, take a look at what happens to the following verbs in the past participle:
cut cut
cortar cortado
read read
ler lido
Note that the verb to cut has the same spelling both in its base form and its past
participle. The pronunciation is also the same for both of them. Now, with verbs
such as to read, even though the spelling is the same, the pronunciation in the
base form is not the same as that of the past participle. In this case, the past
participle is pronounced read, almost like the color red.
The past participle of irregular verbs is something we have to pay attention to
and get used to as we come into contact with the language. Therefore, practice is
important.
The past participle is a fundamental part of the present perfect, for it is the way we
must use the main verb in this verb form.
The basic structure of the affirmative form with verbs in the present perfect is the
same as the one seen so far: subject + auxiliary verb + main verb + complement.
The difference is that the auxiliary verb is have conjugated in the present, and the
main verb is in the past participle. Take a look:
PRESENT PERFE CT
Affirmative Form
subject + auxiliary verb have + main verb in the past participle + complement
sujeito + verbo auxiliar have + verbo principal no particípio passado + complemento
In the previous example, we have the subject they, followed by the auxiliary verb have,
the main verb in the past participle foreseen, and the complement the crisis. Here, we
are talking about an event that happened in the past and still has consequences in the
present. Note that foreseen is the past participle of to foresee, an irregular verb. Also
note that the auxiliary verb to have must be conjugated in the present according to the
subject, which is the third person plural they.
Now, take a look at an example with the subject in the third person singular:
PRESENT PERFE CT
Affirmative Form
subject + auxiliary verb have + main verb in the past participle + complement
sujeito + verbo auxiliar have + verbo principal no particípio passado + complemento
Jake loves working here. It has increased the chances of improving his career.
Jake ama trabalhar aqui. Isso aumentou as chances de melhorar sua carreira.
Here, we have the subject it, which corresponds to the third person singular. Then, we
have the auxiliary verb have conjugated in the present according to the subject as has,
the main verb in the past participle increased, and the complement the chances of
improving his career. Note that increased is the past participle of the verb to increase,
which is regular.
In the former example, Jake still works at the company we are talking about, as you can
see he loves working there. With that, we can understand that the chances of improving
his career started in the past and still continue to have an impact on the present.
In the negative form, the structure is the same as we have seen with other auxiliary verbs:
subject + auxiliary verb + not + main verb + complement. For example:
PRESENT PERFE CT
Negative Form
subject + auxiliary verb have + not + main verb in the past participle +
complement
sujeito + verbo auxiliar have + not + verbo principal no particípio passado +
complemento
Here, we have the subject the meeting, followed by the auxiliary verb have
conjugated in the present according to the subject as has, the particle not, the
main verb in the past participle started, and the complement yet, which is an
adverb that means until now.
When we say the meeting has not started yet, we mean that it did not start in
the past, but should start at some point in the near future. We can also contract
the auxiliary verb and not, forming hasn't. The contracted form is more informal
and more common in spoken English.
Take a look at another example:
PRESENT PERFE CT
Negative Form
subject + auxiliary verb have + not + main verb in the past participle +
complement
sujeito + verbo auxiliar have + not + verbo principal no particípio passado
+ complemento
Here, we have the subject you, followed by the auxiliary verb conjugated in the
present according to the subject as have, the particle not, the main verb in the
past participle delivered, and the complement the project on time. We can also
have a contracted form here: haven’t.
In this previous example, we are saying that failing to deliver the project in the
past has an impact on the present.
The interrogative form of the present perfect also follows the same structure
as that of interrogative sentences with other verb forms that require an auxiliary
verb: auxiliary verb + subject + main verb + complement. Check it out:
PRESENT PERFE CT
Interrogative Form
Have you heard the rumor about a new store in the neighborhood?
Você ouviu o boato sobre uma nova loja no bairro?
PRESENT PERFE CT
Interrogative Form – Ever
Observe that the adverb ever will be placed before the main verb in the past
participle. In the previous example, we are asking if the subject, at any point
in the past, has spread gossip. Also, notice that the verb to spread remains the
same in the base form and in the past participle, because it is an irregular verb.
The verb forms and structures we have discussed so far only require one
auxiliary. However, there are other verb forms that carry two auxiliary verbs.
One of them is the future perfect. This verb form requires the modal verb will
and the auxiliary verb have. The main verb also comes in the past participle.
In the affirmative form, the sentence will have the following structure: subject
+ auxiliary verb will + auxiliary verb have + main verb in the past participle +
complement. Take a look:
FUTURE PERFE CT
Affirmative Form
subject + auxiliary verb will + auxiliary verb have + main verb in the
past participle + complement
sujeito + verbo auxiliar will + verbo auxiliar have + verbo principal no
particípio passado + complemento
Here, the subject is Henry, followed by the first auxiliary verb will, the second
auxiliary verb have, the main verb in the past participle finished, and the
complement this project by tomorrow. Here, finished is the past participle of the
regular verb to finish.
Note the word tomorrow, which means the next or following day, as we have
learned in the last chapter of this module. By tomorrow indicates a moment in
the future. So, we can understand that, when we say that sentence, by some
time the next day Henry will have finished the project. The action will be over
before a specific moment in the future.
Also note that the first auxiliary verb is always will, and the second auxiliary is
always have. In this verb form, have will not change its conjugation according to
the subject. So, even if we have a third person singular, we will still be using have
in its base form.
Observe that in the following example:
FUTURE PERFE CT
Affirmative Form
subject + auxiliary verb will + auxiliary verb have + main verb in the
past participle + complement
sujeito + verbo auxiliar will + verbo auxiliar have + verbo principal no
particípio passado + complemento
Here, we have a condition in the simple present introduced by if. In the second
part of the sentence, we have the future perfect to describe what will have
happened in the future as a result.
Therefore, we have the subject the restaurant, the first auxiliary verb will, the
second auxiliary verb have, the main verb in the past participle gone, and the
complement bankrupt by the end of the year. Gone is the past participle of the
verb to go, which is part of the collocation to go bankrupt, which we saw on the
first chapter.
Notice that by the end of the year refers to a moment in the future, indicating
when the restaurant will have gone bankrupt. So, again, we have an action that
will be over before a certain moment in the future.
As you have just learned, we use the future perfect when we talk about
something that will be completed before a certain moment or event in the future.
In the vocabulary part of this chapter, you have seen this verb form in another
example. Check it out:
FUTURE PERFE CT
The entire crisis management plan and all the effort in its
implementation will have been in vain.
Todo o plano de gestão de crise e o esforço em sua implantação
terão sido em vão.
In the previous example, we use the future perfect to talk about something
that will be complete at a given time in the future. In other words, the plan and
implementation will have been in vain without clear communication.
The negative form of the future perfect also refers to actions that will be
completed before something in the future. The particle not comes between the
two auxiliaries. Take a look:
FUTURE PERFE CT
Negative Form
subject + auxiliary verb will + not + auxiliary verb have + main verb in
the past participle + complement
sujeito + verbo auxiliar will + not + verbo auxiliar have + verbo principal no
particípio passado + complemento
Here, we have the subject Henry, followed by the first auxiliary verb will, the
particle not, the second auxiliary verb have, the main verb in the past participle
finished, and the complement this project by tomorrow. Note the use of the
adverb tomorrow, indicating a certain moment in the future.
Also, notice that the particle not comes after the first auxiliary will and before the
second auxiliary have. You can also use the contracted form won’t, which is a lot
more common in spoken English and much more informal.
Take another example:
FUTURE PERFE CT
Negative Form
subject + auxiliary verb will + not + auxiliary verb have + main verb in
the past participle + complement
sujeito + verbo auxiliar will + not + verbo auxiliar have + verbo principal no
particípio passado + complemento
If they take action, the restaurant will not / won’t have gone
bankrupt by the end of the year.
Se eles tomarem uma atitude, o restaurante não terá ido à
falência até o fim do ano.
Here, we have the subject the restaurant, the first auxiliary verb will, the particle
not, the second auxiliary verb have, the main verb in the past participle gone,
and the complement bankrupt by the end of the year. Note the use of by the end
of the year, which indicates until when something will have happened.
In the interrogative form of the future perfect, the first auxiliary verb changes
its position with the subject. Take a look:
FUTURE PERFE CT
Interrogative Form
auxiliary verb will + subject + auxiliary verb have + main verb in the
past participle + complement
verbo auxiliar will + sujeito + verbo auxiliar have + verbo principal no
particípio passado + complemento
First, we have the first auxiliary verb will, followed by the subject Henry, the
second auxiliary verb have, the main verb in the past participle finished, and
the complement this project by tomorrow. Here, we are asking if something will
have happened when that moment in the future arrives.
Check out another example:
FUTURE PERFE CT
Interrogative Form
auxiliary verb will + subject + auxiliary verb have + main verb in the
past participle + complement
verbo auxiliar will + sujeito + verbo auxiliar have + verbo principal no
particípio passado + complemento
Will the restaurant have gone bankrupt by the end of the year?
O restaurante terá ido à falência até o fim do ano?
We have the first auxiliary verb will, the subject the restaurant, the second
auxiliary verb have, followed by the main verb in the past participle gone, and the
complement bankrupt by the end of the year. Keep in mind that will comes before
the subject, which is followed by the second auxiliary have.
All the verb forms that we have seen so far follow an affirmative structure in which
the subject always comes before the main verb, and that is what determines their
conjugation in some of these forms.
However, there is a structure that is an exception to this: there + be, which we use
to talk about existence. In this structure, what should be taken into account for the
conjugation of the verb to be is what comes after it, and not before it. Take a look:
THERE + BE
Affirmative Form
If there are no people willing to pay for your product or service, there is no
reason for your company to exist.
Se não existem pessoas dispostas a pagar pelo seu produto ou serviço, não
há razão para sua empresa existir.
In this previous sentence, we use there are, because it refers to people, a plural
noun; and there is because it refers to reason, a singular noun. In short, we use
there are when referring to plural nouns, and there is when referring to singular
nouns.
Observe that the word no conveys the idea of absence or zero quantity. So,
what we are saying here is that zero people are interested, and zero reasons
exist to buy a product or service.
However, as we have just seen in the vocabulary part of this chapter, this does
not indicate that the sentence is in the negative, because the word no refers to
the nouns people and reason, not to the verb.
To form negative sentences, we use the particle not. That applies to other verb
forms that we have learned up to this point, including modal verbs. We use there
+ be in the negative form to say that something does not exist. For example:
THERE + BE
Negative Form
If there are not people willing to pay for your product or service,
there is not a reason for your company to exist.
Se não existem pessoas dispostas a pagar pelo seu produto ou serviço,
não há razão para a sua empresa existir.
In the previous sentence, we have inserted the particle not between there are
and people, and also between there is and a reason.
Note that the particle not is connected to the verb to be; therefore, this is a
negative sentence. We can also contract the verb with the particle, forming there
aren’t and there isn’t, used in more informal, less emphatic contexts, and in
spoken English.
To form interrogative sentences with there + be, the verb to be comes before
there. For example:
THERE + BE
Interrogative Form
Are there is followed by the plural noun people, whose existence is what we
want to know. We also have the complement willing to pay for your product.
Take another example, now in the singular:
THERE + BE
Interrogative Form
Here, we have there, followed by the modal verb will, the verb to be in the base
form, followed by what we indicate about future existence, which is lots of
customers, and the complement.
Take a look at another modal verb with there + be:
possibility of existence
possibilidade de existência
probability of existence
probabilidade de existência
Note that the structure is the same as the one with other modal verbs: there +
modal verb may + verb to be in the base form and the complement. Now, we are
talking about the probability of existing customers in the store this week.
If we wish to express a logical assumption of existence, we can use must. Take a
look:
Note we also have the structure there + modal verb + verb to be in the base
form + complement. In this case, the existence of customers in the store this week
is almost certain.
In this chapter, you have had a review and learned some other verb
forms and their use in affirmative, negative and interrogative sentences
that you can apply to the other verb forms you have seen throughout
this module. We took the opportunity to find out how to use the
present perfect and the future perfect. We have also learned how to
use there + be and its variations with modal verbs. If you want to learn
more about these topics, you can refer to the Grammar Guide section
at the end of your book.
GRAMMAR GUIDE
Part 5.
Activities
A. Complete the chart with the correct form of the verbs in the past participle.
B. Fill in the blanks with the missing words according to the verb form in parenthesis.
8. won
6. There may be 7. thought
5. There will be 6. said
delivered 5. read
4. have not / haven’t 4. gone
3. has not / hasn’t started 3. drawn
2. will have finished 2. cut
1. have foreseen 1. been
Activity B – Answers Activity A – Answers
Part 1.
In this chapter, you will learn how to make comparisons of equality, as well as
some collocations and phrasal verbs. You will also learn connectors that indicate
sequence in the speech, and you will see some important vocabulary and
grammar topics to make it happen.
Now look at the script of Customer Relations.
But what if none of this works? What if, after a first attempt at winning
your customers back, some of them are still dissatisfied?
Once you identify where the problem is, it gets easier to solve it. And,
during a crisis, different clients may experience different problems.
Mapping and quickly resolving all of these issues can be a competitive
strategy during a crisis, especially if it’s had an impact on the market as
a whole.
There are two good reasons for you to keep an eye on the competition
during a crisis. First of all, understanding the actions that the
competition is taking to solve the situation can bring up new ideas for
your own company to better deal with the crisis. If a specific strategy
has worked very well for the competition, maybe we should try
something similar, right? Secondly, when you keep track of the moves
made by the competition during a crisis, it is also possible to identify
where they are going wrong. And that’s when we must consider the so-
called competitive differentiation.
It's like what happens in a Formula 1 race; those who spend as little time
in the pit box as possible will have an advantage over the others. I mean,
if there is a demand for a product or service, customers will not wait
around for the company to recover from a crisis so that they can buy it
from them again. They’ll simply migrate to those who can immediately
provide the best service.
Just think about it: if coming out of a crisis is already good news, can you
imagine getting out of it even better than you were when it hit you?
Você já deve ter passado por uma situação de conflito com alguém do
seu trabalho ou da sua vida pessoal. Algo dá errado, e uma das partes
fica com uma péssima impressão da outra. Em situações como esta,
seria aconselhável conversar com a outra pessoa e tentar descobrir
todos os pontos que causaram incômodo. O diálogo ajuda a resolver os
problemas de relacionamento a um nível pessoal, e é também a peça-
chave para resolver a insatisfação dos clientes durante uma crise.
Uma vez que você identifica onde está o problema, fica mais fácil de
resolvê-lo. E, durante uma crise, clientes diferentes podem vivenciar
problemas diferentes. Mapear e resolver todas essas questões
rapidamente pode ser uma estratégia competitiva durante uma crise,
especialmente se ela teve um impacto no mercado como um todo.
Isso nos leva a outro ponto importante na gestão de uma crise: como os
meus concorrentes estão se saindo?
Part 2.
Throughout this module, we have discussed some aspects of the crisis and
measures that can be taken both to prevent it and to deal with it when it catches
us by surprise. Within the context of crisis management, we have learned
several words from different classes, as well as phrasal verbs, collocations, and
expressions with those words.
In the last chapter, we learned some elements of coherence and cohesion
that can and should be used to make our communication clearer. Clear
communication, especially with customers, increases the chances of overcoming
the crisis, as it helps maintain a good relationship with them.
Take a look at the following statement:
In the previous sentence, we have the modal verb should, used to make
recommendations. There are also two topics here that are worth mentioning: the
expressions inspire trust and as soon as possible.
To inspire trust means to make other people trust something or someone or
to make people trust you. In this case, to inspire conveys the idea of prompting
a certain feeling in someone, and that is the recommendation made in the former
statement. Also note that inspire trust is followed by the preposition by, which, in
turn, is followed by a verb that indicates how something can be done. This verb
must be in the -ing form in this case.
To inspire can also mean to encourage someone to do something. Take a look:
In the previous example, we have the verb to inspire with the same meaning as
to encourage someone to do something. In this case, a good leader motivates the
team to go after its dreams. Note that the verb that comes after to inspire or to
encourage is in the infinitive.
The second expression we mentioned earlier is as soon as possible. In written
informal language, it is commonly used in its abbreviation, ASAP. It means as
promptly or as quickly as you can.
This expression is formed by as… as with an adjective in between. In as soon as
possible, the adjective is soon.
We use the construction as + adjective + as to compare things or people. It
implies a comparison of equality: neither more nor less.
You can use this structure to make comparisons in various contexts by changing
the adjective. For example:
AS... AS
tão... quanto
Here, we are using the structure as + adjective + as with the adjective essential,
which means fundamental. In other words, in the previous example, we are
saying that communication and the action plan are equally essential.
Take another example:
AS... AS
tão... quanto
AS
como / conforme
Here, we use as followed by the adjective usual, which means ordinary, normal,
or typical. As usual means that something happens in a recurring, usual, or
customary way. Note that, in the previous sentence, we do not have another as
after the adjective.
The word as can also be used in the same construction to express the idea that
something is in accordance with what has been defined or said. For example:
AS
como / conforme
AS
como
As you may have already realized, the way companies react to a crisis
can bring about interesting opportunities in the market.
Como você já deve ter percebido, a forma como as empresas reagem a
uma crise pode proporcionar oportunidades interessantes no mercado.
We started the previous excerpt with as, followed by the modal verb may to
make an assumption. Therefore, as conveys that what is being said is known to
everyone, either because it has been stated before or because people can infer it.
Also note the phrasal verb to bring about, which comes after the modal verb
can. Here, it means to make something happen or to cause something to
happen. In this case, we are saying the companies’ attitudes can make interesting
opportunities happen.
Phrasal verbs are combinations of verbs and a particle, and their meaning can
vary according to these combinations and the context.
Check out another example:
TO BRING ABOUT
fazer com que algo aconteça / ocasionar algo
Here, we have to bring about meaning that crises can cause a good opportunity for
growth to happen. In this phrasal verb, we have the verb to bring and the preposition
about.
There are other phrasal verbs formed with the verb to bring. For example:
Cameron may not be sure about our investments, but I’ll bring her around.
Cameron pode não estar segura quanto aos nossos investimentos, mas eu irei
convencê-la.
Here, we have the phrasal verb to bring around, formed by the verb to bring and the
particle around. To bring someone around means to persuade or to convince someone.
We can say to bring somebody around or round, and, in the previous example, it implies
that the speaker will try to convince Cameron that their investments are reliable.
As we already mentioned, the same word can be applied in different ways and have
different meanings when combined with other elements. This happens with phrasal
verbs, collocations, as well as in other constructions.
An example of these types of construction is with the word as. We have just seen we can
make comparisons of equality or indicate that something occurs in accordance with what
was determined or predicted using the word as.
Now, if we combine the words as and if, which we have learned in Chapter 4 being used
to introduce a condition, we will have the expression as if, with a totally different use from
its isolated parts. Take a look:
AS IF
como se
WHAT IF
e se
suggestion
sugestão
What if we ask Julius for his opinion? He knows a lot about this subject.
E se pedirmos a opinião do Julius? Ele conhece muito sobre este assunto.
Here, we are using what if to make a suggestion. In the former example, the
suggestion is to ask the opinion of someone who knows more about a particular
subject.
Take a look at another possible use of what if:
WHAT IF
e se
hypothesis
hipótese
What if, after a first attempt at winning your customers back, some of
them are still dissatisfied?
E se, após uma primeira tentativa de reconquistar seus clientes, uma parte
deles ainda continuar insatisfeita?
In the previous example, what if conveys the idea of a hypothesis, not a suggestion.
The hypothesis here is that some of the clients are still dissatisfied after a first
attempt to win them back.
Now, note the word attempt. It is a noun with the same meaning as try. In the
former sentence, this noun comes in first attempt. First is an ordinal number,
indicating the order in which things happen. It is the number one attempt.
So, to say there were other tries that followed that first attempt, we would use
second attempt, and, after that, third attempt, and so on. Take a look:
ORDINAL NUMBERS
CONNE CTORS
finally / at last
por fim / por último / finalmente
The initial argument will be marked by the word first, or its variation firstly, or first
of all. We could also say first and foremost; next, we have second or secondly;
then, we have third or thirdly; and, generally, we conclude the list of arguments with
the connectors finally or at last, which close the line of reasoning.
Take a look at an example:
Here, we have first of all indicating the first point of argument. Then, we have
secondly to introduce a second idea.
In the previous example, we also have two interesting phrasal verbs: to bring up and
to go wrong.
The first one, to bring up, is formed by the verb to bring and the particle up. In this
context, this phrasal verb means the same as to raise, to make something emerge
or increase.
Now, when we use the phrasal verb to bring up to refer to a person, especially kids,
it is synonymous with to raise. Check it out:
PHRASAL VERBS
VERBS
to educate someone
educar alguém formalmente, na escola
PHRASAL VERBS
You can't go wrong with (something) is used to say that there is no way that
someone could make a mistake by doing a certain thing. In the context, Julia has
a formal party to attend, and the outfit that she could choose without making a
mistake would be a black dress.
To go wrong has also another use, when the subject does not refer to a person
but to a situation. In this case, it will no longer mean the same as to make a
mistake. It means not working well. Check it out:
TO GO WRONG
dar errado
Here, we have something goes wrong in the second sentence of the excerpt.
Notice that the subject no longer refers to someone, but to a situation. So, the
meaning of that expression is the same as to stop working properly. In this case,
something involving the relationship between two people stops working properly,
so they get a bad impression of one another.
To get a bad impression is a variation of the following collocation:
COLLOCATIONS
to get an impression
ter uma impressão
COLLOCATIONS
to make an impression
causar uma impressão
In the previous example, we have the modal verb must, used to talk about an
obligation. Here, it is an obligation of the crisis management committee.
Also, note the use of the word first in the expression in the first place. In this
case, we are referring to a starting point or the initial point of a process. We are
not literally talking about the order of something, or the first argument in a line of
reasoning. Therefore, in the first place has the same meaning as the expression to
begin with.
As you already know, it is through this perception and care that the company can
have an opportunity for growth. By maintaining a transparent relationship with the
customer, we are much more likely to keep them interested and, with that, to deviate
from the negative effects that a crisis may have.
Part 3.
Activities
A. Number the columns according to the translation of the words.
( 8 ) insatisfeito(a) ( ) what if
( 10 ) e se ( ) to bring about
( 11 ) fazer com que algo aconteça / ocasionar algo ( ) first of all / firstly / first
B. Fill in the blanks with the appropriate words, according to the translation.
4. we ask Julius for his opinion? He knows a lot about this subject.
E se pedirmos a opinião do Julius? Ele conhece muito sobre este assunto.
6. you may have already realized, the way companies react to a crisis can bring
about interesting opportunities in the market.
Como você já deve ter percebido, a forma como as empresas reagem a uma crise pode proporcionar
oportunidades interessantes no mercado.
Part 4.
So far, in the last few chapters, we have learned the three basic sentence
structures in English – affirmative, negative, and interrogative forms – formed
with different verb forms to talk about events in the present, past, and future.
We have learned that some verb forms will have auxiliary verbs, and we
have also learned the use of modal verbs. The general structure of affirmative
sentences with modal verbs is as follows:
MODAL VERBS
Affirmative Form
As you know, modal verbs imprint different meanings on the verbs they precede.
Take the modal verb can, for example:
ability / possibility
habilidade / possibilidade
In the previous example, we used can twice. In the first sentence, can conveys
the idea of possibility, that is, it is possible for customers to express themselves.
This possibility refers both to the present and the future. In the second sentence,
it is possible to interpret that can conveys two ideas: one of possibility and
another of ability.
So, it is possible for the company to better listen to customers, and, at the same
time, the company becomes capable of doing that, either in the present or in the
future. In both situations, can could be replaced by the expression to be able to.
Note that these sentences are in the affirmative form, which means they have
the subject, followed by the modal verb can, the main verb in the base form,
and a complement.
We have also learned that the modal verb can is used to ask for permission in the
interrogative form. For example:
permission
permissão
Here, we have a recurring question in customer service, especially when the customer
is contacted by phone. The modal verb can implies permission. We can even include
the word please at the end to be polite. As the sentence is in the interrogative form,
we have the modal verb can followed by the subject I, then the main verb in the base
form write, and the complement down your address, please.
Note that the general structure of modal verbs in the interrogative form is as follows:
MODAL VERBS
Interrogative Form
MODAL VERBS
Negative Form
subject + modal verb + not + main verb in the base form + complement
sujeito + modal verb + not + verbo principal na forma base + complemento
We use can in the negative form to talk about the lack of ability in the present.
For example:
lack of ability
falta de habilidade
Here, we have the subject Sheila, the modal verb can, the particle not, the main
verb in the base form swim, and the complement very well. Note that, in the
negative form, can and the particle not form a single word, cannot. Here, we are
talking about Sheila’s inability to swim. It is possible to contract cannot as can’t.
The contracted form is less emphatic and more common in spoken language.
Take another example, now to convey lack of possibility:
lack of possibility
falta de possibilidade
Here, we are using cannot to express the lack of possibility of Dr. Anderson
seeing someone.
We can also use the negative form to talk about lack of permission. For example:
lack of permission
falta de permissão
In the previous case, cannot denotes lack of permission to leave work early.
In addition to learning that we can use can for permission, ability, possibility or
lack of them, we have also learned the modal verb may, which can sometimes
have a similar idea to that of the modal verb can.
Whereas can is used to talk about a possibility, that is, something that is not
impossible to happen, the modal verb may is used to talk about a probability,
that is, when we have grounds to believe that something has a fifty-fifty chance
of happening. Take a look:
probability
probabilidade
If the company takes too long to solve its customers’ problems, it may
lose them to the competition for good.
Se a empresa demora para resolver os problemas dos clientes, ela pode
perdê-los de vez para a concorrência.
probability
probabilidade
Once you identify where the problem is, it gets easier to solve it. And, during
a crisis, different clients may experience different problems.
Uma vez que você identifica onde está o problema, fica mais fácil de resolvê-lo.
E, durante uma crise, clientes diferentes podem vivenciar problemas diferentes.
In the former example, we are using may to talk about the probability of problems
varying according to customers.
Another modal verb we have also seen is must, used in the affirmative form to
express necessity. For example:
necessity
necessidade
When you keep track of the moves made by the competition during a crisis,
it is also possible to identify where they are going wrong. And that’s when
we must consider the so-called competitive differentiation.
Quando você acompanha os movimentos feitos pela concorrência durante uma
crise, também é possível identificar onde ela está errando. E é quando devemos
considerar o diferencial competitivo.
obligation
obrigação
We use the modal verb must to talk about something that is mandatory either in
the present or in the future. In the previous example, the use of seat belts while
driving refers to an obligation according to the law.
Note that the structure here is that of the affirmative form: subject + modal verb
+ main verb in the base form + complement.
When we use must in the negative form, we talk about prohibition. Take a look:
prohibition
proibição
In the previous example, we use the negative form of the modal verb must to
express a prohibition, which is to run a red light. Note that the structure here is
the same as the negative form for all modal verbs. We just add not after must.
It is worth emphasizing that we cannot express prohibition with sentences in the
affirmative form, just as we cannot talk about obligations in the negative form
with must. Prohibitions will always be expressed in sentences in the negative
form, just as obligations and necessities will always be expressed in sentences
in the affirmative form.
There is yet another idea that we can express using the modal verb must in the
affirmative form, which is to make deductions. Check it out:
deduction
dedução
Anna has worked on the solution for this problem all day. She must be
mentally exhausted.
Anna trabalhou na solução deste problema o dia todo. Ela deve estar
mentalmente exausta.
In this case, we are using must to make a logical deduction, based on the information
we have: Anna worked all day; therefore, we can assume she is mentally exhausted.
Must implies a high chance of concluding that something is right.
For us to make deductions in the negative form, we use the modal verb can instead
of must.
In order to help understand how it happens, read the following excerpt:
Let’s suppose we went to an office party and then a colleague, Greg, ended
up drinking too much. The employees are usually allowed to bring someone,
who we call a plus-one.
Suponhamos que nós fomos a uma festa do escritório e, então, um colega, Greg,
acabou bebendo demais. Normalmente, os funcionários podem levar alguém,
que nós chamamos de convidado.
One of Greg’s colleagues observes he is not well, and tells the plus-one the following:
deduction
dedução
Don’t let Greg drive. He’s had too much to drink, so he must be drunk.
Não deixe o Greg dirigir. Ele tomou muitos drinques, então, deve estar bêbado.
deduction
dedução
In the previous example, can’t does not refer to lack of skill, ability or possibility, but
to a deduction regarding the present. We are assuming that Greg cannot be sober,
as he has drunk too much. Also note that we have the modal verb can contracted
with the particle not as can’t. If we want to emphasize the negative, we can use the
non-contracted form, cannot.
In all of the cases with modal verbs we have seen so far, we were talking about
events in the present or in the future.
However, there are some contexts in which we can use a different structure from
the ones we have learned, which does not exactly refer to the present or to the
future, but to the past.
The basic structure in the affirmative form is:
subject + modal verb + auxiliary verb have + main verb in the past
participle + complement
sujeito + modal verb + verbo auxiliar have + verbo principal no particípio
passado + complemento
It is important to point out that modal verbs work as auxiliary verbs; therefore,
the modal verb is the first auxiliary, and have is the second auxiliary. It is always
conjugated as have, regardless of the subject. The main verb is always in the past
participle. And the complement may or may not be part of this structure, as it will
depend on the main verb.
This structure appears with different modal verbs, each of which will convey a
different idea.
When we use may in this structure, we convey probability in the past. For instance:
You may have already experienced a conflict situation with someone from
work or from your personal life.
Você já deve ter passado por uma situação de conflito com alguém do seu
trabalho ou da sua vida pessoal.
Here, note we have the subject you, the modal verb may, then the auxiliary verb
have, the main verb in the past participle experienced, and the complement a
conflict situation with someone from work or from your personal life.
We are talking about a high probability. However, it refers to the past, different
from the use of the modal verb may followed by the verb in the base form.
Take another example about probability in the past:
As you may have already realized, the way companies react to a crisis
can bring about interesting opportunities in the market.
Como você já deve ter percebido, a forma como as empresas reagem a
uma crise pode proporcionar oportunidades interessantes no mercado.
Here, we have the subject you, followed by the modal verb may, the auxiliary
verb have, the adverb already, and the main verb in the past participle realized.
The adverb already means previously, or beforehand. It emphasizes that the
situation is behind us. The previous example introduces what we infer the viewer
may have already realized or noticed, that is, it is also a probability in the past.
We can also use this same structure with the modal verb must to talk about
logical deductions in the past. It denotes a high probability that something has
happened.
Consider the following excerpt:
In the previous example, saying that Martha must have misheard someone is a
logical deduction about what has most probably happened in the past, since no
one will actually be fired. Note that the sentence is formed by the subject Martha,
followed by the modal verb must, the auxiliary verb have, the main verb in the past
participle misheard, and the complement someone.
Observe how there is no change in the conjugation of the second auxiliary, even
though the subject is the third person singular.
So, in order to illustrate the use of deductions in the past with must, read the
following excerpt within the same context:
After everything has been cleared up, the staff feels relieved. However,
everybody is worried about Martha, because she has been acting
strange after all this misunderstanding. Then, one of the staff members
mentions that she had a project once that did not go as expected and
that she got very disappointed at the time.
Depois que tudo foi esclarecido, a equipe se sente aliviada. Porém, todos
estão preocupados com Martha, pois ela tem agido de maneira estranha
depois de todo esse mal-entendido. Então, um dos membros da equipe
menciona que, uma vez, ela teve um projeto que não saiu como esperado e
ela ficou muito decepcionada naquela ocasião.
Based on the previous background, a staff member makes the following deduction:
She must have been worried because her action plan didn’t work as expected.
Ela deve ter ficado preocupada porque seu plano de ação não funcionou conforme
o esperado.
The team member comes to that conclusion because he knows that Martha’s action plan
did not go as she expected. Therefore, it is a deduction that refers to the past, as you can
see by the structure of the sentence.
To make a negative deduction in the past, we use cannot or can’t, with the same
structure we have seen so far: modal verb + auxiliary verb have + main verb in the past
participle.
To better illustrate the idea with the negative form of the modal verb can, read the
following story:
Some very important files of a company are kept in a locked drawer in the director’s office.
Only her and her secretary, Veronica, have the key that gives access to these documents.
However, one day, the director opens the drawer and sees that they are no longer there.
Completely caught by surprise, the director calls her husband and tells him what happened.
He reminds her that Hector, a former employee who had just been fired, did not prove to be
a very reliable person, so he could have taken these documents before leaving.
Alguns arquivos muito importantes de uma empresa são mantidos em uma gaveta trancada
no escritório da diretora. Somente ela e sua secretária, Veronica, têm a chave que dá acesso a
eles. Porém, um dia, a diretora abre a gaveta e vê que os documentos não estão mais lá. Pega
completamente de surpresa, a diretora liga para seu marido e conta a ele o que aconteceu. Ele a
lembra que Hector, um ex-funcionário que tinha acabado de ser demitido, provou não ser uma
pessoa muito confiável, portanto, ele poderia ter levado estes documentos antes de ir embora.
Hector can’t have taken the files. Only Veronica has the key
to that drawer.
Hector não poderia ter levado os arquivos. Só a Veronica tem a chave
dessa gaveta.
Here, we have the subject Hector, the modal verb can in its contracted form with the particle
not, can’t, the auxiliary verb have, the main verb in the past participle taken, and the
complement the files. Therefore, she assumes Hector did not get the documents, as she knows
that only her secretary had the keys to her drawer.
The husband, knowing how much his wife trusts Veronica, replies with another deduction:
Veronica is so reliable and loyal. She can’t have done anything to harm you.
Veronica é tão confiável e leal. Ela não pode ter feito algo para te prejudicar.
Here, we have the subject she, the modal verb can in its contracted form with the
particle not, can’t, the main verb in the past participle done, and the complement
anything to harm you. The negative form of the modal verb can is being used to
make another deduction in the past, regarding something the husband assumes did
not happen.
It is worth mentioning that the use of cannot or can’t in this structure does not
convey the idea of lack of permission or lack of ability in the past. To express those
ideas, we need to use another modal verb: could.
First, take a look at its basic structure:
subject + modal verb could + main verb in the base form + complement
sujeito + modal verb could + verbo principal na forma base + complemento
As you can see, the structure of affirmative sentences with could is the same as
it is with other modal verbs. Could works as an auxiliary verb, and the main verb
comes in the base form.
Have a look at an example:
Here, we have the subject Mike, followed by the modal verb could, the main
verb in the base form run, and the complement five miles before gaining weight.
Before gaining weight implies that Mike used to run prior to that. So, here, by
using could, we can infer that Mike can no longer run as he did before gaining
weight.
We would use the modal verb can if he managed to run five miles in the present.
Take a look:
Here, we have the same structure as the one used with could just before: subject
+ modal verb + main verb in the base form + complement. However, in the
previous example, we are talking about an ability in the present or in the future,
which is that Mike is able to run five miles. As we have already mentioned, can
conveys the idea of a possibility in the present or the future.
Depending on the context, could also implies possibility. However, we will not
be referring to a past possibility. Could implies a remote possibility either in the
present or in the future.
Taking the last example into account, we could think of some possibilities for
Mike to get back into shape using the modal verb could. Check it out:
In these cases, we are not talking about a lack of probability in the past, but about
the remote possibility that he could go to the gym or start a diet in the present or
in the future. Note that the structure here is the same for both sentences: subject +
modal verb + main verb in the base form + complement.
To use could to talk about a possibility in the past, we would have to use the
structure in which the modal verb is followed by the second auxiliary verb have and
the main verb in the past participle. For example:
subject + modal verb + auxiliary verb have + main verb in the past
participle + complement
sujeito + modal verb + verbo auxiliar have + verbo principal no particípio
passado + complemento
In the former sentence, we have the subject Daniel, the modal verb could, the
auxiliary verb have, followed by the main verb in the past participle been, and the
complement an excellent engineer. Here, we are talking about something that could
have happened but actually didn’t, because Daniel is a ballet dancer today, not an
engineer. Therefore, we refer to a possibility in the past.
Take another example:
subject + modal verb + auxiliary verb have + main verb in the past
participle + complement
sujeito + modal verb + verbo auxiliar have + verbo principal no particípio
passado + complemento
Here, we have the same structure with the subject they, the modal verb could,
followed by the auxiliary verb have, the main verb in the past participle anticipated,
and the complement the crisis before going bankrupt. In this case, we are talking
about the possibility of having avoided the crisis and bankruptcy in the past.
In this chapter, you have reviewed some modal verbs and learned
a few more uses for them in the present, future, and past. If
you want to learn more about these topics, you can refer to the
Grammar Guide section at the end of your book.
GRAMMAR GUIDE
Part 5.
Activities
A. Complete the sentences with the right modal verb according to the guidelines.
3. My daughter play the piano at the age of ten. (Ability in the past)
Minha filha conseguia tocar o piano aos dez anos de idade.
4. She have been worried because her action plan didn’t work as expected.
(Deduction in the past / affirmative)
Ela deve ter ficado preocupada porque o seu plano de ação não funcionou conforme o esperado.
6. Don’t let Greg drive. He’s had too much to drink, so he be drunk.
(Deduction / affirmative)
Não deixe Greg dirigir. Ele bebeu demais, então, ele deve estar bêbado.
5. Hector the files. Only Veronica has the key to that drawer.
Hector não pode ter levado os arquivos. Só a Veronica tem a chave dessa gaveta.
6. Anna has worked on the solution for this problem all day. She
mentally exhausted.
Anna trabalhou na solução deste problema o dia todo. Ela deve estar mentalmente exausta.
6. must be
5. can’t have taken / cannot have taken
4. must have misheard 8. cannot / can’t 4. must
3. can’t have done / cannot have done 7. must not / mustn’t 3. could
2. must wear 6. must 2. can
1. can’t be / cannot be 5. cannot / can’t 1. could
Activity B – Answers Activity A – Answers
Part 1.
In this chapter, you will learn some idioms and some elements of coherence and
cohesion. You will also learn some phrasal verbs and verbs related to business,
as well as other important vocabulary and grammar topics.
Now look at the script of Unforeseen Crises.
UNFORESEEN CRISES
After all that we have said so far, I think you may have already come
up with a good idea of how crisis management can help you and your
company at the most delicate moments.
When a crisis arises out of the blue, it requires a quick diagnosis by the
company. And it gets particularly complicated once the crisis has already
set in.
Let me illustrate that with an example. Imagine that an online store runs
out of stock of a certain product, blocking its sales on the website. When
poring over the problem, the company’s management discovers that the
product has become unavailable, not because of a sudden increase in
demand, but due to a problem with the haulage company. That information
will make it possible for the committee to quickly send a second company
to transport the goods from the factory to the warehouse.
And then, guys, it’s no secret. Readiness and adaptability will make all the
difference to rise above a crisis, especially when it comes out of the blue.
Depois de tudo o que comentamos até aqui, imagino que você já esteja
com uma boa ideia de como a gestão de crise pode ajudar você e sua
empresa nos momentos mais delicados.
Quando uma crise surge “do nada”, ela exige um diagnóstico rápido por
parte da empresa. E isso fica particularmente complicado uma vez que a
crise já esteja instalada.
Deixe-me ilustrar isso com um exemplo. Imagine que uma loja online
esgote o estoque de um determinado produto, bloqueando sua venda
no site. Ao se debruçar sobre o problema, a gestão da empresa
descobre que o produto acabou, não por um aumento repentino na
demanda, mas por um problema com a transportadora. A informação
tornará possível que o comitê envie rapidamente uma segunda empresa
para transportar a mercadoria da fábrica para o estoque.
Part 2.
We have seen many aspects of the crisis so far. One thing we can be sure of is that crisis
management strategies are all about preventing a crisis from happening or stifling it as
soon as possible by being prepared for the worst-case scenario.
However, sometimes a crisis may be an unpredictable event:
black-and-white
muito claro / fácil de entender como certo ou errado
gray area
zona cinzenta / área obscura ou nebulosa
As you can see, idioms are expressions whose meaning is not literal. It is
important to be on top of these expressions because they are very common in
everyday life.
When a crisis appears out of the blue or unexpectedly, there are some things
we need to pay attention to in order to quickly take action. Take a look:
Let’s analyze that sentence in parts. The first sentence shows a condition,
introduced by if. And its consequence is that you will neglect the root of the
crisis. Note that the word root refers to the underlying cause or essence of some
issue, problem, or difficulty. It would be similar to the cause of the matter.
In other contexts, root can also mean the part of a plant that grows down into
the earth, or even the main part of a word, that is, the basis to which we add
prefixes and suffixes in word formation. For example, in the adverb exclusively,
which you can see in the previous example, -ly is the suffix, as we have already
seen, and exclusive is the basis, the root of the word. In short:
ROOT
raiz
root root
raiz de uma planta raiz / radical de uma palavra
So, identifying the root of the problem is important to be able to actually begin to
solve it.
However, it should not be the primary focus either. Take a look:
On the other hand, if you devote all your efforts to identifying the cause
of the crisis, you will not be giving proper attention to your customers.
Por outro lado, se você dedicar todos os seus esforços para identificar a
causa da crise, você não dará a atenção apropriada a seus clientes.
On the one hand, the employees have been very tired lately. On the
other hand, the overwork is temporary.
Por um lado, os funcionários têm estado muito cansados ultimamente. Por
outro lado, o excesso de trabalho é temporário.
Here, we use on the one hand, introducing the first idea, which is that the
employees have been very tired lately. Then, we use on the other hand
presenting the counterpart, which is that the overwork is a temporary situation.
So, we have got two contrasting ideas put together by this pair of connectors.
Notice that we use the word hand here. When isolated, hand refers to the part
of the body at the end of the arm. However, its meaning cannot be taken literally
in this case either.
We also have lots of idiomatic expressions formed with other parts of the body,
just as we saw with colors at the beginning of this chapter. Again, it is worth
mentioning that these words should not be taken literally. Check them out:
Knowing these idioms is of great help to grasp messages correctly when we are
learning a second language.
Resuming the points on crisis management, if we pay too much attention to one side,
the other may end up being neglected, and vice versa. That is why it is so important to
find a balance. Take a look:
TO JUGGLE
conciliar / equilibrar
Those are not easy to juggle, but it’s not impossible at all.
Não é fácil fazer tudo isso ao mesmo tempo, mas não é de todo impossível.
It’s important to note that those refer to the conditions we mentioned previously:
paying attention to one side and not neglecting the other. Instead of repeating both
topics, the pronoun those works as an element of coherence, as it refers back to the
conditions mentioned in the sentence.
Now, notice that the verb to juggle is being used here to express exactly that balance
we just mentioned. In this context, to juggle means to keep things in balance.
We can also use this verb mentioning the two things that must be balanced. To do so,
we use the preposition with. Observe:
In this construction, we use the preposition with to say that we balance one thing
with another.
Here is another example with the same construction:
Note that, here, we are saying that Bruna is trying to manage or to conciliate
more than one activity at the same time: her work and her dance classes.
In these previous examples, the verb to juggle is being used in a figurative sense.
It actually comes from the artistic act of throwing several objects up in the air,
then catching and throwing them up again, without letting them fall.
Regarding this literal meaning, we could say:
TO JUGGLE
fazer malabarismo
Gabriela juggles with two balls and four knives at the same time.
It’s incredible!
Gabriela faz malabarismo com duas bolas e quatro facas ao mesmo tempo.
É incrível!
Here, we use to juggle to refer to the physical and artistic act that Gabriela can perform. Note
that we use the preposition with to name the objects with which she juggles. Also note that
the idea of this verb is similar to to balance, to conciliate many elements at the same time;
however, in this case, we are referring to its literal meaning.
There is also a third use of this verb that conveys a slightly different idea from the original.
Take a look:
You’ll have to juggle your meetings around so you can meet your boss later.
Você terá que rearranjar suas reuniões para que possa encontrar seu chefe mais tarde.
To run out of stock means that there are no products available for sale. This is
the phrasal verb to run out of something, which means to use something until it
finishes.
Here, to run does not mean to move along, operate, or control something,
as we saw in previous chapters, because it forms a phrasal verb. Therefore, it
cannot be understood based on its isolated parts.
To run out can also be used in another way. Take a look:
TO RUN OUT
acabar
Here, we use running out to say that something is ending. In this case, time is
coming to an end. Note that it is the subject of the sentence.
To run out can also mean to expire or to lose validity, as in:
TO RUN OUT
expirar
In this sentence, we are using to run out to say that the document in question
will expire, lose its validity. This phrasal verb is commonly used to refer to
contracts and documents.
To run out is also part of the expressions to run out of steam and to run out
of gas, in the sense of losing energy or not being interested in something
anymore. For example:
Sometimes, a critical event may cause people to run out of steam. That is why it is
important to quickly diagnose the problem so that it can be solved fast. One way
to do this is to base the analysis on some indicators.
In the hypothetical case of the store having the sales blocked due to lack of stock,
the root of the problem is the haulage company. After hiring another company, it
would be necessary to analyze the following indicators:
We have started the previous sentence with firstly, an element of cohesion that we saw
last chapter. It introduces a first point of argument. Then, we have again a condition
introduced by if. Also, note that the word goods, which we have learned in Chapter 4, refers
to the items for sale.
The sentence closes with the expression according to plan. In this context, it means
everything happened as expected or as planned. According to is another element of
cohesion that implies an idea of conformity.
We can also use according to in this same sense of conformity in other contexts. Take a look:
ACCORDING TO
de acordo com / em conformidade com
Here, according to is being used to state that the payment depends on the position the
person holds in the company.
Other than that, according to is also used as a connector, conveying another meaning:
ACCORDING TO
de acordo com
According to the reports, the last action plan is the most effective one we have.
De acordo com os relatórios, o último plano de ação é o mais eficiente que temos.
In this case, according to is being used to introduce information based on what was
already shown in the reports; it does not imply one thing depends on the other.
So, after the problem has been detected and the committee has taken the necessary
actions, it is also important that it pays attention to other parts of the company that
may have been affected. As we saw, we need to detect the problem as quickly as
possible in order to promote a happy ending.
This idea of agility in diagnosis is concluded as follows:
Readiness and adaptability will make all the difference to rise above a
crisis, especially when it comes out of the blue.
Agilidade e adaptabilidade farão toda a diferença para superar uma crise,
especialmente quando ela aparece “do nada”.
TO RISE
aumentar / levantar
Rising is being used to say that prices are going up, increasing. Note that a
complement to this verb is not necessary. Something rises, and that is it.
Now, with raise, we would say:
TO RAISE
aumentar / levantar
Note that we use raising with the same meaning, which is to increase, but, here,
we need a complement. It is as if we said whoever raises, raises something. The
complement of the verb, in this case, is their prices every day.
So, we see that to rise has no complement for the verb, and the formation of
sentences with it will be subject + to rise.
But, with the verb to raise, we must add a complement for the verb. Then, the
formation of sentences with this verb is subject + to raise + complement of the verb.
We can also use these verbs implying physical movement towards an upper position.
Take a look:
TO RISE
aumentar / levantar
In this case, we use rises to say that the sun moves upwards. There is no
complement for the verb here either.
Now, compare:
TO RAISE
aumentar / levantar
Here, we are using raise, and the complement of this verb is your hand, to say
that you have to put your hand up to get something. Note that, with to raise, a
subject raises something.
Now you know how important it is to take quick action to detect the
origin of a crisis that appears suddenly. We also learned many different
idioms with names of colors and body parts, as well as some elements
of coherence and cohesion, and phrasal verbs.
Part 3.
Activities
A. Number the columns according to the translation of the words.
( 5 ) muito claro / fácil de entender como certo ou errado ( ) out of the blue
( 6 ) zona cinzenta / área obscura ou nebulosa ( ) to put one’s neck on the line
B. Fill in the blanks with the appropriate words, according to the translation.
Part 4.
SUBJE CT PRONOUNS
In the first part of this excerpt, we have a crisis as the subject, followed by the
verb arises. Then, we have the pronoun it fulfilling the role of subject, followed
by the verb requires. It is a subject pronoun that is being used in the place of
crisis, which was mentioned earlier.
We use it, the third person singular, when we refer to things, animals or ideas.
Still in the third person singular, we use he to refer to people who identify
themselves as male, and she for those who identify as female. In the plural, we
have they for any gender, and it is used to refer to people, animals, things, and
ideas.
The first person singular is I, and the first person plural is we.
In the second persons singular and plural, the pronoun is written and
pronounced the same way: you. It is necessary to understand the context to
know to which of the two we are referring. Take a look:
SUBJE CT PRONOUNS
I we
eu nós
you you
você vocês
it he she they
ele / ela ele ela eles / elas
Subject pronouns replace proper names or common nouns when they function
as subjects of the sentence. By doing so, we avoid the repetition of the same
noun, be it in the same sentence or in another one that is very close in the
context. That makes the speech more fluid and natural.
As you know, to form sentences in English in most verb forms, we need a subject.
That is, the verb cannot be by itself in the sentence.
In the case of the imperative form, as you may recall, even though the subject
is omitted, there is one: you. It is simply omitted because, by the tone of the
sentence, it is clear that we are referring to the second person, or the one or ones
we are speaking with.
As you may also know, it is possible to mention the subject in the imperative form
in order to make it more emphatic in negative sentences, or to convey a tone of
anger in affirmative sentences. Nonetheless, omitted or not, there is a subject.
However, a subject pronoun will not always necessarily refer to a specific thing,
animal, situation, or person. That is the case of the subject pronoun it.
Depending on the situation, it will not refer to any specific thing, idea or animal
that was previously mentioned. And, in this kind of situation, it has an impersonal
function.
Have a look at the next sentence:
SUBJE CT PRONOUN IT
It’s no secret. Readiness and adaptability will make all the difference to
rise above a crisis, especially when it comes out of the blue.
Não é segredo. Agilidade e adaptabilidade farão toda a diferença para
superar uma crise, especialmente quando ela aparece “do nada”.
We have it working as a subject pronoun twice: once in the part that says: it’s no
secret; and the other in the part that says: it comes out of the blue. Note that the
second it refers to crisis, which was mentioned in the first part of the sentence.
Now, the first it does not refer to crisis, nor to what comes next. It is used to say in a
general way that there is no secret in this particular situation; therefore, the first it in
the sentence has an impersonal function.
Let’s look at another example:
SUBJE CT PRONOUN IT
impersonal function
função impessoal
It is the subject of this sentence, but it does not refer to anything specific. It is
being used before the verb to be just because we could not form this sentence
without a subject. That means we cannot just say is important to carry out the
plan carefully. This sentence is incorrect because it is missing the subject.
One context in which this is very clear is when we talk about time. Take a look:
SUBJE CT PRONOUN IT
impersonal function
função impessoal
Note that, here, we are using too late, which means not in time for something. It
is a time reference. It is the subject of the sentence, but it is not referring to the
problem, because this is the object of the sentence. It is neither referring to the
damage, which is the subject of the second sentence, and is new information in
this context. In this case, the pronoun it is not replacing anything previously said,
as it has an impersonal function.
There is yet another subject pronoun that can be used not referring to something
or someone in particular: you. You can be used to refer to people in general, not
specifically to the one to whom we are talking. Take a look:
generic use
uso genérico
In this excerpt, we have you as the subject of all the actions described. In this
context, we are not talking about a specific person, but about people in general.
So, it is a generic use of this pronoun.
There are other words that may work as pronouns and that may play the role of
subject. Take a look at the next example.
DEMONSTRATIVES
Those are not easy to juggle, but it’s not impossible at all.
Não é fácil fazer tudo isso ao mesmo tempo, mas não é de todo impossível.
Those is a demonstrative in the plural. In this case, it works as the subject of the
sentence. It is being used as an element of coherence and cohesion. Those is
referring to the hypothetical situations mentioned just before in the context. By
doing so, we avoid repetition in the speech.
Do not miss the opportunity of noticing that we have the subject pronoun it again
as a subject with an impersonal function.
In addition to those, there are three other demonstratives: in the plural, we have
these, and in the singular, this and that. We can use all of them as the subject of
the sentence to refer to something already mentioned in the context, connecting
ideas, and avoiding the repetition of the same information.
Let’s see another example:
DEMONSTRATIVES
The company offers clear communication and fair prices. These are
essential characteristics of a successful business.
A empresa oferece comunicação clara e preços justos. Estas são
características essenciais de um negócio de sucesso.
DEMONSTRATIVES
Note that it would get very repetitive. It is not incorrect, but it would not sound very
natural.
We can also use the demonstrative this with the same function. Take a look:
DEMONSTRATIVES
The committee hasn’t come up with an action plan yet. This means that
the problem is very serious.
O comitê não criou um plano de ação ainda. Isso significa
que o problema é muito sério.
This is the subject of the second sentence. We chose to use this to refer to the
previous situation, which was just mentioned.
Now, we could use that when mentioning something more distant in time, or
something said by someone else. Observe the dialogue:
DEMONSTRATIVES
- I’ve heard that Rick is telling everyone he is going to buy the store.
- Eu ouvi que o Rick está dizendo para todo mundo que ele vai comprar a loja.
Here, that is the subject of the sentence, and it is referring to what was mentioned earlier by
someone else about Rick buying the store. Note how distant it sounds from the moment of the
speech, so we use that to imply there is a distance in time.
In addition to being used as elements of coherence and cohesion and to avoid mentioning the
same word or expression twice within the same context, there is another use for demonstratives.
We can also use demonstratives to point things out by referring to the physical distance between
them and the speaker. Take a look:
DEMONSTRATIVES
close distant
perto longe
singular
this that
este / esta / isto esse / essa / isso
aquele / aquela / aquilo
plural
these those
estes / estas esses / essas / aqueles / aquelas
So, we use this and these to talk about things that are close, and that and those
to talk about things that are distant. For example:
DEMONSTRATIVES
By the use of the demonstrative this, we can infer that the restaurant is close
to the person who is speaking. By the use of the demonstrative that, we can
understand that the diner is far away from them. See that both this and that
refer to singular nouns.
In the plural, we use these or those. Take a look:
DEMONSTRATIVES
Through the use of these to determine files, we can understand that they are
close to the speaker. Those would imply the files are distant from the speaker.
Notice that, in the former examples, this restaurant, that diner, these files, and
those files, the demonstratives are accompanied by the nouns or elements
to which they refer. Therefore, in these cases, they are not pronouns. They are
called determiners.
We just saw how demonstratives can accompany nouns to point out their
physical distance, and, right before that, we also saw how to use them as
pronouns to connect the discourse and make it more natural.
At the beginning of this chapter, we learned a little about subject pronouns, and
we also learned how it may have an impersonal function, and that you can have
a generic use.
Now, let’s take a look at another type of pronoun: possessive pronouns. It is very
common for students to confuse these pronouns with the possessive adjectives,
as they are very similar and both have the function of indicating ownership.
it its
ele / ela sua(s) / seu(s)
Note its before the word sales. Its is a possessive adjective, and we know that
because it is immediately followed by the noun sales. And those sales belong to
the online store. So, its is the possessive adjective that refers to things, animals,
and situations in the third person singular.
Take a look at another example:
she her
ela sua / seu
Here, we have her followed by the noun job, and then again followed by the noun
dance classes. In both cases, her works as a possessive adjective indicating
ownership of the nouns job and dance classes by Bruna.
they their
eles / elas sua(s) / seu(s)
Here, we use their to indicate the possession of prices. From the context, we
know that it refers to supermarkets, which corresponds to the subject pronoun
they. So, their is a possessive adjective, because it is immediately followed by
the noun prices.
So, we can conclude the following:
Possessive adjectives are always placed before the noun they modify.
Now, it is possible to replace the construction possessive adjective + noun with
a possessive pronoun. When we do that, we avoid repetition in the speech. Let’s
see an example:
In the first sentence, we have your position, formed by the possessive adjective
your and the noun position. We know that the position mentioned belongs to the
subject of the sentence, which is you, so the corresponding possessive adjective
is your.
Now, in the second sentence, we have the subject I and, at the end, mine, a
possessive pronoun which indicates possession by the subject in the first
person singular. It is used here to avoid repeating my position. That is because
we know, by the context and by the use of the pronoun, what we are referring
to: the position that I, first person singular, occupy. So, when we say mine, it is
enough.
Let’s look at another example:
First, we have his action plan, formed by the possessive adjective his and the
noun action plan. Later on, we have hers, a possessive pronoun corresponding
to the third person singular she, which is being used here to avoid saying her
action plan. It would sound repetitive, as it is already clear in the context that we
are comparing two action plans.
But keep in mind that it is not wrong to use the structure possessive adjective
+ noun more than once within the same context. However, it can sound very
repetitive and unnatural. Take a look:
Note that we are using two possessive adjectives with the same noun: ideas.
And that is okay, but not great. It is preferable to say:
POSSESSIVE PRONOUNS
I my mine
eu meu(s) / minha(s) meu(s) / minha(s)
he his his
ele sua(s) / seu(s) / dele sua(s) / seu(s) / dele
it its its
ele / ela / isso sua(s) / seu(s) / disso sua(s) / seu(s) / disso
we our ours
nós nosso(s) / nossa(s) nosso(s) / nossa(s)
It is worth mentioning that, even though the possessive pronoun its exists grammatically, it is not commonly
used in everyday English.
GRAMMAR GUIDE
Part 5.
Activities
A. Complete the chart with the missing possessive adjective or pronoun.
2. The company offers clear communication and fair prices. are essential
characteristics of a successful business.
A empresa oferece comunicação clara e preços justos. Estas são características essenciais de um
negócio de sucesso.
5. The committee hasn’t come up with an action plan yet. means that the
problem is very serious.
O comitê não criou um plano de ação ainda. Isso significa que o problema é muito sério.
8. Their
7. Yours
6. these 6. Ours
5. This 5. Its
4. It is / It’s 4. Hers
3. those 3. His
2. These 2. Your
1. It is / It’s 1. Mine
Activity B – Answers Activity A – Answers
Part 1.
In this chapter, you will learn some common expressions and phrasal verbs with
the verbs to go, to come, and to take. You will also see important vocabulary and
grammar topics.
Now look at the script of The Aftermath.
THE AF TERMATH
Well, it goes without saying that hard times always offer a great
opportunity to learn. A crisis usually brings out a series of problems that
the company has probably overlooked. And the fight against the crisis
can be just the right moment to solve all of them.
However, let’s not forget that the key move in crisis management is to
identify what triggered the crisis in the first place. Only then will it be
possible to identify the points of improvement, preventing the same
issues from coming back and creating a vicious circle.
Imagine you leave your place on a cloudy day to go to work and forget
to take your umbrella. A storm suddenly falls down and catches you
off guard. After arriving at work soaking wet and in need of dry clean
clothes, you will naturally reflect on your situation: “Did I get wet in this
rain because I forgot my umbrella? Or was it because I didn’t notice the
weather was cloudy? Or maybe, I didn’t consider checking the weather
forecast…”
The post-crisis is also important for the company to revise and question
its internal processes: “how can we offer more security to employees?
And what about more satisfaction to customers? How can we generate an
increase in productivity?”
After the dust has settled, the manager should consider everything that
was done to fix the problems and choose the solutions worth keeping.
That can result in new processes that will make the company much more
competitive in the market.
But the lessons learned will only be effective if consolidated into new
action plans. And that’s because other unpredictable situations may always
take us by surprise. So, the knowledge acquired during the overcoming of
a crisis must be applied to the creation of new contingency plans, including
the development of multiple scenarios. In other words, guys, when a
crisis comes to an end, it’s time to get ready for the next one. In fact, crisis
management is a never-ending task.
Think of the big companies that have been around for a long time. How
many crises have they probably gone through? How many lessons have
they learned and how many different strategies have they incorporated
into their routine? Resilience is definitely an essential trait here.
So, tell me…have you been keeping your crisis management plans up to
date, or are you still leaving the house without an umbrella?
O PÓS -CRISE
Até agora, nós vimos o que fazer antes e durante uma crise. Porém, o
que acontece depois que ela passa de vez? A empresa voltará à mesma
rotina que ela tinha antes da crise acontecer? Quais lições nós podemos
aprender com tudo isso?
Bem, não é preciso dizer que tempos difíceis sempre oferecem uma
grande oportunidade de aprendizado. Uma crise geralmente traz uma
sucessão de problemas que a empresa provavelmente deixou passar. E
o combate à crise pode ser o momento exato para solucionar todos eles.
Se você tem uma situação que vai além do controle humano – como
catástrofes naturais, por exemplo – a empresa tem que refletir sobre
as ações e os procedimentos que devem ser implantados para
reduzir o impacto de tais eventos. “Mas, como?” – você pode estar se
perguntando. Bem, deixe-me ilustrar isso com um exemplo.
Depois que a poeira baixou, o gestor deve considerar tudo o que foi
feito para corrigir os problemas e escolher as soluções que valem a
pena manter. Isso pode resultar em novos processos que tornarão a
empresa muito mais competitiva no mercado.
Pense nas grandes empresas que estão por aí há muito tempo. Por
quantas crises elas provavelmente passaram? Quantas lições elas
aprenderam e quantas estratégias diferentes elas incorporaram à sua
rotina? A resiliência é, definitivamente, uma característica essencial
aqui.
Part 2.
It goes without saying that hard times always offer a great opportunity
to learn.
Não é preciso dizer que tempos difíceis sempre oferecem uma grande
oportunidade de aprendizado.
Here, we have the idiomatic expression it goes without saying, which implies
that something is obvious, so it would not even have to be said. Note that it is
formed by the subject pronoun it with an impersonal function.
Another expression that we can use here with the same meaning is needless to
say, in which needless means unnecessary. Note that needless is an adjective
formed by the noun need and the suffix -less, which implies lack or absence.
It is always worth remembering that idioms do not usually convey the literal
meaning of their words taken separately. In the expression it goes without
saying, the verb to go does not mean physically moving towards another place.
In fact, there are other idioms with the verb to go that refer to different uses in
different contexts. Take a look:
Here, we have to go with the flow, an expression used to say that a person
does the same thing as most people do, often because it is easier or because it
is a trend.
Look at one more expression:
GO FOR IT
ir em frente / ir fundo / ir nessa
If you want to be an actress, quit your current job and go for it!
Se você quer ser atriz, saia do seu emprego atual e vá em frente!
Note that we use go for it as an incentive here. This expression implies you
should do anything necessary to get something, give all you have got to achieve
a certain goal. It is normally used in the imperative form, as you can see here, or
with the modal verb should to imply a suggestion.
There is also the expression to go into overdrive, which conveys the idea of
starting to be very active. For example:
TO GO INTO OVERDRIVE
tornar-se muito ativo ou trabalhar intensamente / deslanchar
His career as a biologist has gone into overdrive in the past two years.
A carreira de biólogo dele deslanchou nos dois últimos anos.
Note that it is the same as saying the career has started to take off or to become
successful.
There is also the expression to go through the floor. Look at it in a sentence:
Joseph is just going through the motions in this project. He’s not really dedicated
to it.
Joseph está só empurrando este projeto com a barriga. Ele não está realmente
dedicado a ele.
In the previous question, it is being asked how many crises, or the quantity of
crises, someone has endured or suffered.
Here is another example with this phrasal verb:
Allan says the manager may not go through with this plan.
Allan diz que o gerente pode não levar este plano adiante.
TO GO AROUND / GO ROUND
satisfazer a todos / distribuir
In this case, to go around is being used alongside the word enough to convey
the idea that something is insufficient to be shared by everyone. In this case,
there is not enough food for everybody. Usually, we form sentences with this
expression using there + be. The particle can be either around or round.
Now, in a different context, if the same phrasal verb is followed by a place, the
idea changes completely. So, if we say:
PROVERBS WITH TO GO
It implies that the consequences of one’s actions will have to be dealt with
eventually.
Take a look at another one:
PROVERBS WITH TO GO
Easy come, easy go means that something easily gained is prone to be lost just as
easily.
Notice that both expressions are not only formed with to go, but also with the verb
to come.
When used on its own, the verb to come can be understood as a simple action, that
is to physically move towards the place where the speaker is.
However, when we use the verb to come in phrasal verbs and other expressions, it
does not necessarily mean the same as it does in isolation.
Check it out:
TO COME BACK
voltar / retornar
Notice the phrasal verb to come back, which means to return. In this case,
with the committee’s actions, we prevent the same problems from repeating
themselves.
Take a look at another expression formed with to come:
TO COME TO AN END
chegar ao fim / acabar
When a crisis comes to an end, it’s time to get ready for the next one.
Quando uma crise chega ao fim, é hora de se preparar para a próxima.
TO COME IN HANDY
vir a calhar
Handy is an adjective that means useful. So, to come in handy means to be useful.
Let’s see another one:
TO COME TO HAND
estar à mão / à disposição / de fácil acesso
A company should use any strategy that comes to hand in case of a crisis.
Uma empresa deve usar qualquer estratégia que esteja à mão no caso de uma crise.
TO COME TO A HEAD
chegar a um ponto crítico
Christian will not take action until the problems come to a head.
Christian não agirá até que os problemas cheguem a um ponto crítico.
Head can refer to the part of the body above the neck. But, in this expression,
it means peak or critical point. So, the expression to come to a head means to
become critical or to reach a critical point. It implies that some strong action has
to be taken. See that, in this case, we refer to problems, either negative or bad
things.
And, for the crisis to come to an end, we need to identify the root of the problem
and learn from it. In other words:
To take over is a phrasal verb that means to begin to have control over
something. Now, the word takeaway is a compound noun formed with the verb
to take and the adverb away. It is not a verb. In this context, takeaway is the
main message that you learn from something you hear or read, such as a speech
or a text.
However, we may use this same noun in another context. Look:
Here, takeaway refers to a meal that will be cooked and bought at a shop or
restaurant and taken somewhere else to be eaten. It is very common in the context
of restaurants, cafeterias, or regarding food and drinks in general. It is the same as
takeout.
To take and away can also form the phrasal verb to take something away, which
means to remove or subtract something. For example:
TO TAKE AWAY
levar embora / tirar
Great leaders shouldn’t let a crisis take away their peace of mind.
Grandes líderes não deveriam deixar uma crise tirar sua paz de espírito.
Here, we use take away in the sense of subtracting something. Peace of mind is a
feeling of calmness and serenity, which is usually jeopardized in a moment of crisis.
This last chapter is a great opportunity to take a moment to reflect on the main
message that the entire module sends us concerning crisis management. We should
think about our daily choices and actions so that we prevent rainy days from turning
into critical events. In other words:
Have you been keeping your crisis management plans up to date, or are
you still leaving the house without an umbrella?
Você tem mantido seus planos de gestão de crise em dia, ou ainda tem saído
de casa sem um guarda-chuva?
In English, a rainy day may refer to an actual day of bad weather and rain coming from the
sky, but it can also refer to a time of need or trouble, in a figurative context. Based on that
information, we may infer that the word umbrella in the previous example is being used as
a metaphor.
Also, notice the adjective: up to date. It means the same as current or updated. The
opposite of that is out of date or outdated. These adjectives can be used to describe
something that is not in vogue anymore, or that has become obsolete. For example:
Your computer system is out of date. You might want to change it soon.
Seu sistema de computador está desatualizado. Você pode querer trocá-lo em breve.
Here, we have out of date within the context of technology. Note that it characterizes the
computer system. It would also be possible to use outdated in this sentence.
Part 3.
Activities
A. Number the columns according to the translation of the words.
( 5 ) Tudo o que vem fácil, vai fácil. ( ) Easy come, easy go.
B. Fill in the blanks with the appropriate words according to the translation.
2. Sheila should and stop thinking about the pros and cons of the
project.
Sheila deveria ir com a corrente e parar de pensar sobre os prós e contras do projeto.
Part 4.
In the grammar parts of all the chapters in this module, we have focused a lot on the basic
structures of sentences and on the use of modal verbs in different sentence formations
to talk about the present, the past, and the future. We have also covered the functions of
some words that are part of these structures, as was the case in the previous chapter, in
which we covered different types of pronouns.
In Chapter 4, we talked about the present perfect, its structure, and how it is used to talk
about things that happened in the past but still affect the present. Take a look:
PRESENT PERFE CT
Affirmative Form
subject + auxiliary verb have + main verb in the past participle + complement
sujeito + verbo auxiliar have + verbo principal no particípio passado + complemento
PRESENT PERFE CT
Negative Form
subject + auxiliary verb have + not + main verb in the past participle +
complement
sujeito + verbo auxiliar have + not + verbo principal no particípio passado +
complemento
Megan has not / hasn’t spoken to her parents in the past two years.
Megan não falou com seus pais nos dois últimos anos.
As you can see, we use the particle not right after the auxiliary verb have, conjugated
here as has according to the subject in the third person singular, Megan. We can contract
the auxiliary verb with not, forming hasn’t.
Note that the main verb here is spoken, the past participle of to speak. The phrase in the
past two years indicates that this action started in the past and still has relevance in the
present. In other words, Megan hasn’t spoken to her parents, or hasn’t solved her issues
with them yet.
Now let’s see sentences in the interrogative form of the present perfect:
PRESENT PERFE CT
Interrogative Form
auxiliary verb have + subject + main verb in the past participle + complement
verbo auxiliar have + sujeito + verbo principal no particípio passado + complemento
We start the sentence with the auxiliary verb have before the subject you. Notice that the
auxiliary verb agrees with the subject: in this case, it is the second person singular, so the
auxiliary verb is conjugated as have. The main verb, thought, is the past participle of to
think. The rest of the sentence is the complement.
Note that we are using the adverb ever between the subject and the main verb. This
adverb is typically used in questions in the present perfect. It is similar to before, or at any
moment in your life.
As you know, we use the present perfect to talk about things that happened in the past and
still affect the present, either due to relevance or continuity, depending on the context.
Now, the present perfect continuous focuses on the continuity of the action. In other
words, it implies that something started in the past, continued in the past, and is still
happening in the present. Just by using this verb form, it is clear that that there is continuity.
When it comes to the present perfect, however, that idea is not necessarily
obvious. Let’s compare some examples:
PRESENT PERFE CT
The previous sentence is in the present perfect. Note that we only have one
auxiliary verb – have, conjugated according to the subject as has –, and the main
verb comes right after, in the past participle – gone through. Depending on the
context, we can understand that Doris no longer goes through difficult situations
or that she is still going through some kind of trouble. There is not enough
context to tell if this situation is over or not.
However, in the present perfect continuous, it becomes clear the situation is not
over yet. Observe:
Note that we have two auxiliary verbs, have, conjugated according to the
subject as has, and be in the past participle as been. The main verb comes in
the -ing form. In this case, there is no doubt: we are clearly saying that Doris is
still going through difficult situations that started in the recent past.
Let’s compare two more examples. Suppose Fred has five reports to deliver
today. As it is a lot of work, he started early in the morning:
Note that, when we use the present perfect continuous here, we are saying
that Fred started working at 8 in the morning, and he’s still working now. Clearly,
he has not stopped working. The focus is on the continuity of the action. It is
important to mention that we use since to indicate the starting point of the
action. In this case, it started at 8 a.m.
Now, compare:
PRESENT PERFE CT
From the context, it is clear that three out of five reports are already finished. To convey
that idea, we’ve used the present perfect, and we reinforced that by adding the adverb
already to the sentence. So, in this case, the present perfect refers to a past action that
has relevance in the present, but it does not indicate continuity, because the three reports
mentioned are already written. Fred is not writing them anymore.
As you may have noticed, the structure of the present perfect continuous requires two
auxiliary verbs: have and be. Observe:
subject + auxiliary verb have + auxiliary verb be in the past participle + main
verb in the -ing form + complement
sujeito + verbo auxiliar have + verbo auxiliar be no particípio passado + verbo
principal na forma -ing + complemento
In this case, the subject is they, the first auxiliary verb is have, the second auxiliary verb
is be, conjugated in the past participle as been, the main verb is to work in the -ing form,
and the complement is on this project for four hours. We can also contract the auxiliary
have with the subject, forming they’ve, which is more informal and less emphatic.
Another important detail here: note that we use for to point out the duration of the
action. In this case, four hours.
In the negative form, we place the particle not between the two auxiliaries, and only one
of them, have, agrees with the subject. Take a look at the example:
subject + auxiliary verb have + not + auxiliary verb be in the past participle +
main verb in the -ing form + complement
sujeito + verbo auxiliar have + not + verbo auxiliar be no particípio passado + verbo
principal na forma -ing + complemento
Greg hasn’t been studying properly. He’s going to fail the test.
Greg não tem estudado direito. Ele não passará na prova.
We have the subject in the third person singular Greg, the first auxiliary verb
have contracted with the particle not as hasn’t, the second auxiliary verb in the
past participle, been, the main verb in the -ing form, and the complement. Note
that only the first auxiliary verb is conjugated according to the subject.
In the interrogative form, we will reverse the order of only one of the auxiliaries,
have. We place it before the subject. Take a look:
First, we have the first auxiliary verb have, followed by the subject you, the
second auxiliary verb in the past participle been, the main verb in the -ing form
keeping, and the complement your crisis management plans up to date.
Pure interrogative forms can only have yes or no for an answer. They work as if
they are questioning the information, which can be either confirmed or denied.
However, when we want to ask a question about a specific aspect, then we
will need the help of the question words. Each one of them is used to ask about
something in particular. Some of them also have variations, which means they
cover an even wider range of specific questions.
That is the case of the question word how. One of its variations is how many,
used to ask about quantity. For example:
In this case, we are asking about the quantity of crises big companies have
endured. After that, note that we have an interrogative sentence in the present
perfect, formed by the auxiliary verb have, the subject they, and the main verb
in the past participle gone through. The adverb probably is used here to convey
an idea of probability.
In isolation, the question word how is commonly used to ask questions about
condition and manner. In both cases, the structure is question word how +
interrogative form.
When we greet someone, we usually ask:
As you can see, how is followed by the interrogative form of the simple present.
Another way of asking about condition is in the present continuous:
In this case, the main verb in the -ing form is to do. Note that there is no
complement after the verb doing.
However, if we keep the same question, but add a complement to the verb doing,
the idea will change completely. Take a look:
It is still a question in the present continuous, but now we are referring to the
way something is being done. The difference compared with the last example
is that there is a complement here, which is this task. This complement changes
the idea of the entire question. Here, it has nothing to do with a greeting or with
someone’s condition at the present moment.
We can also ask questions with how in both uses in other verb forms, such
as the present perfect and the present perfect continuous. Once again, the
complement will make all the difference to help us grasp the meaning of the
question. Check it out:
PRESENT PERFECT
condition
condição
condition
condição
Both previous questions ask about someone’s condition. In the first question, we
have how, followed by the interrogative form of the verb to be in the present
perfect: the auxiliary verb have, followed by the subject you and the main verb
in the past participle been. There is no complement.
In the second question, we have how followed by the interrogative form of the
verb to do in the present perfect continuous. Therefore, we have the auxiliary
verb have, the subject you, the auxiliary verb in the past participle been, and
the main verb in the -ing form doing. Again, no complement.
Note that been, in the first sentence, is the main verb. In the second sentence,
been is the auxiliary verb, and doing is the main verb in the -ing form.
However, this verb does not convey the meaning of performing an activity in this
context, and the sentence must be understood as a whole.
In short, these two questions refer to someone’s condition, but taking into account
a period that starts in the past and goes up to the present.
We can also use how to ask the way things have been done. For example:
The latter example is in the present perfect continuous. Compared with the
former example, note that the main verb doing has a complement: your job. As
a consequence, in this case, the verb to do means to perform an activity, so the
complement changes the whole meaning of the sentence.
In addition to asking questions with the verb forms that we have seen so far, the
question word how can also be used with modal verbs. For example:
We have a question formed by how and the interrogative form of the modal verb
can. In this context, we are asking about the possible ways we can offer more
security to the employees.
As modal verbs have specific meanings according to the context, each one will
convey a specific tone to questions asked with the question word how.
There is one modal verb that we have not talked about yet: might. In sentences in
the affirmative form, it will follow the general basic structure for modal verbs:
subject + modal verb might + main verb in the base form + complement
sujeito + modal verb might + verbo principal na forma base + complemento
Might conveys probability, and so does the modal verb may, as we have already
learned. However, the difference is that might can be chosen over may in some
contexts, especially to express remote probability.
Observe:
remote probability
probabilidade remota
We have a tight deadline. The team is efficient, but we might need more
people.
Nós temos um prazo apertado. A equipe é eficiente, mas é provável que
precisemos de mais pessoas.
Note that the structure is the same as the one used with the other modal verbs:
the subject is we, followed by the modal verb might, the main verb in the base
form need, and the complement more people.
Using might, we imply that there is a remote probability that we will need
more people to meet the deadline. Note that the sentence says that the team is
efficient; therefore, it is still unclear whether more people will really be necessary.
Now, if we had used may instead of might, the probability would sound stronger.
We can also talk about the probability of something not happening using the
structure of the modal verb might in the negative form. Take a look:
subject + modal verb might + not + main verb in the base form + complement
sujeito + modal verb might + not + verbo principal na forma base + complemento
The structure is the same we already know; we just add the particle not after the modal
verb might. Here, we are talking about the probability of something not happening, that
is, there is a chance that Juliana will not go to the meeting.
Let’s look at another example:
Kate might not like this dish. There’s a lot of onion in it.
É provável que Kate não goste deste prato. Tem muita cebola nele.
suggestion
sugestão
We’ve seen lots of grammar topics today. You might want to do the
following exercises to practice.
Nós vimos muitos tópicos gramaticais hoje. É provável que você queira
fazer os exercícios a seguir para praticar.
In the previous example, we have the subject you, followed by the modal verb
might, the main verb in the base form want, and the complement to do the
following exercises to practice. Note that, after the modal verb might, there is the
verb in the base form want, which works as the main verb, and its complement is
introduced by another verb in the infinitive form, in this case, to do.
In this chapter, you have learned several verb forms, the modal
verb might, and the functions of different words. If you want to
learn more about these topics, you can refer to the Grammar Guide
section at the end of your book.
GRAMMAR GUIDE
Part 5.
Activities
A. Write (PP) if the sentence is in the present perfect or (PPC) if it is in the present perfect
continuous.
ADVERBS OF TIME
now yesterday
agora ontem
tomorrow today
amanhã hoje
before ago
antes atrás
already soon
já em breve
after tonight
depois hoje à noite
yet early/earlier
ainda cedo / mais cedo
recently lately
recentemente ultimamente
finally late/later
finalmente tarde / mais tarde
ADVERBS OF TIME
ADVERBS OF TIME
ADVERBIAL PHRASES
In English, all verb forms will take a subject that cannot be omitted from the
sentence. The only verb form in which the subject is usually omitted is the
imperative.
The subject may be omitted in the imperative form in English because it is
always used to refer to the person or people we are talking to.
IMPERATIVE FORM
Affirmative Structure:
Main Verb + Complement
AFFIRMATIVE ST RUCTURE
Subject + Main Verb + Complement (if necessary)
We go to work at 7 a.m.
Nós vamos para o trabalho às 7h da manhã.
(Subject: we; Main Verb: go; Complement: to work at 7 a.m.)
Apart from the imperative and the simple forms, every other verb form will take one or more
auxiliary verbs in the affirmative.
The auxiliary will vary according to the verb form. Modal verbs and the verbs be, have, or do can
function as auxiliaries. In the affirmative form, they will always be placed in between the subject
and the main verb. Some verb forms require more than one auxiliary verb.
Check it out:
AFFIRMATIVE STRUCTURE
Subject + Auxiliary Verb(s) + Main Verb + (Complement)
And now you know the basic sentence structure of the affirmative form in English.
DEMONSTRATIVES
Question
That baby in the picture is so cute. Is he your son?
Aquele bebê da foto é tão fofo. Ele é seu filho?
(Demonstrative, that, placed before the noun it refers to, baby determiner)
DEMONSTRATIVES
Question
Let’s watch that movie you mentioned tonight.
Vamos assistir àquele filme que você mencionou hoje à noite.
(Demonstrative, that, placed before the noun it refers to, movie determiner)
Demonstratives have singular and plural forms. We use this in the singular or these in the plural to talk about
people or things that are near us.
DEMONSTRATIVES
Position—Near
Singular Plural
This book is amazing. She needs to read all these books.
Este/Esse livro é incrível. Ela tem que ler todos estes/esses livros.
DEMONSTRATIVES
Time—Present
Singular
This week I’ll finish reading John’s book.
Esta semana eu vou terminar de ler o livro do John.
Plural
I’ve been working really hard these past few months.
Eu venho trabalhando muito duro nestes últimos meses.
If we want to talk about people or things that are not near us, we use that or those.
DEMONSTRATIVES
Position—Far
Singular Plural
That blouse over there is beautiful. Those shoes back there are nice.
Aquela blusa lá é bonita. Aqueles sapatos lá atrás são legais.
DEMONSTRATIVES
Time—Past
Singular
Do you remember that month we spent at the ranch with the kids?
Você se lembra daquele mês que passamos na chácara com as crianças?
Plural
Those days were the best!
Aqueles dias foram os melhores!
DEMONSTRATIVES
It or This?
DEMONSTRATIVES
Approval or Disapproval
The demonstratives this and that can also be used to emphasize adjectives and adverbs,
having the function of an intensifier.
DEMONSTRATIVES
Emphasize an adjective or adverb
That’s it. Now you know the main uses and functions of demonstratives.
FUTURE PERFE CT
Basic Structure
Affirmative Form
Subject + Will + Have + Main Verb (Past Participle) + Complement
Negative Form
Subject + Will + Not + Have + Main Verb (Past Participle) + Complement
Interrogative Form
Will + Subject + Have + Main Verb (Past Participle) + Complement
FUTURE PERFE CT
By the end of next year, Sammy will have already graduated from college.
Até o final do próximo ano, Sammy já vai ter se formado na faculdade.
(In this case, we’re referring to a point in time—the end of next year.)
It’s important to highlight that the time phrase always establishes a point in time in
the future when the future perfect action will be completed. We cannot establish
the exact moment when a future event described by the future perfect will happen.
If we want to be more specific, we should use other ways to refer to the future.
FUTURE PERFE CT
Actions complete before a certain situation in the future
When Patrick meets Lucy, she will have already made up her mind.
Quando Patrick encontrar Lucy, ela já vai ter se decidido.
(In this sentence, we introduce the future situation using when.)
PRONOUNS
Specific
Refer to definite people, things, or places.
Se referem a pessoas, coisas ou lugares definidos.
Generic / Non-specific
Do not refer to a specific person, thing, or place. They are either generic or indefinite.
Não se referem a uma pessoa, coisa ou lugar específicos. Eles são genéricos ou indefinidos.
The pronoun it, for example, may refer to a specific thing, animal, or place, but it can also have a
non-specific use when it does not refer to a person, or thing, or to any other part of the sentence.
In such cases, the pronoun it is often referred to as impersonal. Check some examples.
PRONOUN – IT
Specific and Generic Uses
Specific
Other pronouns such as you, they, he, or she can also have generic uses when
they refer to people in general. Check some examples so you can understand
it better.
Specific
Generic
PRONOUN – YOU
Specific and Generic Uses
Specific
Mark, you haven’t been studying hard enough. If you want to pass, you must study.
Mark, você não tem estudado o bastante. Se você quer passar, tem que estudar.
(you = Mark)
Non-specific
Everyone knows that graduating from college takes time and effort.
If you want to pass, you must study.
Todo mundo sabe que para se formar na faculdade é preciso tempo e esforço.
Se você quer passar, tem que estudar.
(you = anyone who wants to pass)
To refer to the singular, we can also use the pronoun one. One is used to talk
about people in general, and it can be replaced by the pronoun you with generic
meaning.
INDEFINITE PRONOUNS
People Things
Somebody/Someone Something
Alguém Alguma coisa
Anybody/Anyone Anything
Qualquer pessoa Qualquer coisa
Everybody/Everyone Everything
Todo mundo Tudo
INDEFINITE PRONOUNS
No one should ever die of starvation. Can someone tell me the truth?
Nobody should ever die of starvation Can somebody tell me the truth?
Ninguém deveria morrer de fome. Alguém pode me dizer a verdade?
(No one / Nobody = Not even one person) (Someone/Somebody = an unspecified
person, some person)
INDEFINITE PRONOUNS
And this how you use pronouns in specific and generic ways.
INTERROGATIVE SENTENCES
Structures
INTERROGATIVE SENTENCES
Verb forms with the verb to be as the main verb (simple present and simple past)
Is she a lawyer?
Ela é advogada?
However, in the case of verb forms in which the main verb is not
the verb to be, one auxiliary verb or a modal verb is required.
INTERROGATIVE SENTENCES
Verb forms with other verbs as the main verb
Are you studying for the test? ( main verb: study in the -ING form)
Você está estudando para a prova?
(The verb to be works as an auxiliary, and the sentence is in the present continuous)
INTERROGATIVE SENTENCES
Verbs forms with more than one auxiliary verb
Have you been studying for the test? ( main verb: study in the -ING form)
Você tem estudado para a prova?
(The verb to have works as the first auxiliary, and the verb to be in the past participle, as the second)
Have you been waiting for a long time? ( main verb: wait in the -ING form)
Você está esperando há muito tempo?
(The verb to have works as the first auxiliary, and the verb to be in the past participle, as the second)
Notice that in English when someone asks a question using auxiliaries, we can give a long or a short
answer, and to give a short answer we need to use the auxiliary verb.
INTERROGATIVE SENTENCES
Long and short answers
Do you like chocolate? Yes, I like chocolate. Yes, I do. Yes, I like.
Você gosta de chocolate? Sim, eu gosto de chocolate. Sim, eu gosto.
I’ve seen so many beautiful places. I couldn’t have chosen just one to write about.
Eu vi muitos lugares bonitos. Eu não poderia ter escolhido escrever sobre apenas um.
(seen = past participle of to see; chosen = past participle of to choose)
If you want to learn more about the perfect forms or the passive voice, check the grammar
guides on these topics. They both use the past participle, and that’s why it’s important to focus
on this topic.
The same rule applies for the verbs to mean, to read, and to hear, for example.
Verbs ending in -ELL change to -OLD and keep the same form in the
past and past participle.
Another group of verbs will undergo some changes in their past forms, but their past
participle forms are spelled and pronounced just like their base forms.
For some others, we’ll add -N or -EN to the base form to make the past participle,
and they may change the pronunciation of the stressed vowel.
The highly frequent verbs to be, to do, and to go also have different forms.
Check it on the table.
Notice that there are two different past forms for the verb to be, but there
is only one for the past participle, which is been.
Be Was/Were Been
Ser, estar
Do Did Done
Fazer
Go Went Gone
Ir
And now you know the past participle of irregular verbs, when to use it,
as well as how to use it in the active and passive voices.
MODAL VERBS
Affirmative Form
I can drive.
Eu posso dirigir.
(subject: I + modal verb: can + main verb: drive)
In negative sentences, we keep the same pattern, but include NOT after the
modal verb. We generally use the contracted form can’t.
MODAL VERBS
Negative Form
I can’t drive.
Eu não posso dirigir.
(subject: I + modal verb: can + not (can’t) + main verb: drive)
MODAL VERBS
Interrogative Form
The modal verb can in its affirmative form typically expresses possibility, present ability,
and permission. In the negative form, it expresses lack of possibility, lack of ability, and lack
of permission.
MODAL VERBS
Uses
Affirmative Negative
Interrogative
Asking a Favor
Can you help me?
Eu não posso te encontrar mais tarde.
It’s important to acknowledge that these uses are usually easily noticed within the context, since the same
sentence in different contexts may have different meanings.
You can speak English. You have the ability to speak English.
Você pode/sabe falar inglês. Você tem habilidade para falar inglês.
MODAL VERBS
Affirmative
In negative sentences, we’ll include the word not after the modal verb.
When we use the negative form, we generally use the contracted form couldn’t.
MODAL VERBS
Negative
Subject + Modal Verb + Not + Main Verb in the Base Form + Complement
MODAL VERBS
Interrogative
It’s important to notice that modal verbs in general should be associated with their functions in the context,
and not with time ( past, present or future). This is particularly important when analyzing the modal verb
could, since the time reference may change drastically according to its function in the context.
The modal verb could in its affirmative and negative forms can be used to express probability or lack of
probability, either of a present or a future event. It can also refer to abilities, but in such case, could refers to
past abilities.
Mary is not home right now. She’s usually at her parents’ in the morning. She could be there.
Mary não está em casa agora. Ela geralmente está na casa de seus pais de manhã. Ela pode estar lá.
(She could be there = It’s possible that she is there)
We can also use the modal verb could to talk about probability in the future, that is, the chances for
something to happen.
Brian is just as good. But he couldn’t be the new manager; he has no management skills.
Brian é tão bom quanto ela. Mas ele não poderia ser o novo gerente; ele não tem habilidades gerenciais.
(He couldn’t be the new manager = It’s not likely to happen)
Kevin won a lot of football tournaments back in our school days. Boy, he could run!
Kevin ganhou muitos torneios de futebol americano na época de escola. Cara, como ele
sabia/podia correr!
The modal verb could in the interrogative form is used to ask about possibilities
or abilities in the past.
In the interrogative, the modal verb could is also very frequently used to make
requests in a polite way, either asking for a favor or for permission.
And now you know how to use the modal verb could.
MODAL VERBS
Sentence Structure
Affirmative Form
Subject + Modal Verb + Main Verb in the Base Form + Complement (if necessary)
Sujeito + Modal Verb + Verbo Principal na Forma Base + Complemento (se necessário)
Negative Form
Subject + Modal Verb + Not + Main Verb in the Base Form + Complement (if necessary)
Sujeito + Modal Verb + Not + Verbo Principal na Forma Base + Complemento (se necessário)
Interrogative Form
Modal Verb + Subject + Main Verb in the Base Form + Complement (if necessary)
Modal Verb + Sujeito + Verbo Principal na Forma Base + Complemento (se necessário)
It may rain.
Pode chover. / Pode ser que chova.
(There is a reasonable chance that it will rain).
The modal verb may can also be used to say that there
is a chance that something does not happen.
In this case, we use it in the negative form. Take a look:
I may not be the best student in class, but I’m very dedicated.
Eu posso não ser o melhor aluno da turma, mas eu sou muito dedicado.
Be careful with the pieces of news you read on social media. They may not be true.
Tenha cuidado com notícias que você lê nas redes sociais. Elas podem não ser verdadeiras.
When we ask for permission, the interrogative form can only be used in the first person.
However, when we answer these permission requests, that is, when we give permission or not, we will use
the affirmative or the negative forms in the second person. Have a look:
Asking for permission: Excuse me, Ms. Sullivan. May I come in?
Com licença, senhora Sullivan. Eu posso entrar?
Giving permission, or not: Yes, you may come in. / No, you may not come in.
Sim, você pode entrar. / Não, você não pode entrar.
And now you know how to use the modal verb may.
MODAL VERB
Structure
Affirmative
Subject + Modal Verb + Main Verb (Base Form) +
Complement (if necessary)
Negative
Subject + Modal Verb + NOT + Main Verb (Base Form) +
Complement (if necessary)
Interrogative
Modal Verb + Subject + Main Verb (Base Form) +
Complement (if necessary)
Now you know what a modal verb is, the structures you’ll use with them, and
when and how to use the modal verb might.
MODAL VERBS
Sentence Structure
Affirmative Form
Subject + Modal Verb + Main Verb in the Base Form + Complement (if necessary)
Sujeito + Modal Verb + Verbo Principal na Forma Base + Complemento (se necessário)
Negative Form
Subject + Modal Verb + Not + Main Verb in the Base Form + Complement (if necessary)
Sujeito + Modal Verb + Not + Verbo Principal na Forma Base + Complemento (se necessário)
Interrogative Form
Modal Verb + Subject + Main Verb in the Base Form + Complement (if necessary)
Modal Verb + Sujeito + Verbo Principal na Forma Base + Complemento (se necessário)
John’s son was born. He must be very happy. It must be nice to be rich.
O filho do John nasceu. Ele deve estar muito feliz. Deve ser legal ser rico.
Visitors must not ( mustn’t) cross this line. This is a restricted area.
Os visitantes não podem cruzar esta linha. Esta é uma área restrita.
Must is rarely used in the interrogative form, but it can be used to confirm or to
double-check duties and obligations. For instance:
MODAL VERBS
Sentence Structure
Affirmative Form
Subject + Modal Verb + Main Verb in the Base Form + Complement (if necessary)
Sujeito + Modal Verb + Verbo Principal na Forma Base + Complemento (se necessário)
Negative Form
Subject + Modal Verb + Not + Main Verb in the Base Form + Complement (if necessary)
Sujeito + Modal Verb + Not + Verbo Principal na Forma Base + Complemento (se necessário)
Interrogative Form
Modal Verb + Subject + Main Verb in the Base Form + Complement (if necessary)
Modal Verb + Sujeito + Verbo Principal na Forma Base + Complemento (se necessário)
Depending on the context, sentences with the modal verb should can be understood
as a polite way to talk about obligations and duties. Have a look at some examples:
You should clean your room. People should respect other people’s choices.
Você deve limpar o seu quarto. As pessoas devem respeitar as escolhas de outras pessoas.
(It’s your responsibility). (It’s a social rule).
In some other cases, should expresses that something is probable because it is logical or normal,
that is, you refer to a deduction. For instance:
MODAL VERBS
Sentence Structure
Affirmative Form
Subject + Modal Verb + Main Verb in the Base Form + Complement (if necessary)
Sujeito + Modal Verb + Verbo Principal na Forma Base + Complemento (se necessário)
Negative Form
Subject + Modal Verb + Not + Main Verb in the Base Form + Complement (if necessary)
Sujeito + Modal Verb + Not + Verbo Principal na Forma Base + Complemento (se necessário)
Interrogative Form
Modal Verb + Subject + Main Verb in the Base Form + Complement (if necessary)
Modal Verb + Sujeito + Verbo Principal na Forma Base + Complemento (se necessário)
In some cases, the modal verb would is used as a softer and less definitive form of the modal will,
or as the past of will when we are reporting sentences.
Expressing hypothesis is one of the most common uses of the modal verb would. And since it is
used to express hypothetical situations, you’ll see that it is used in many conditional sentences.
In such cases, we’ll use a clause with would to refer to unreal or uncertain situations together with
an if-clause.
We can also use would to make polite requests. If we observe it carefully, we’ll see that it’s still
a request made from a hypothetical perspective, but now you are actually asking something
from someone.
Would you help me with my project? Would you like some coffee?
Você me ajudaria com o meu projeto? Você aceitaria um café?
Would you go to the grocery store for me? Would you like me to drive you home?
Você iria ao supermercado para mim? Você gostaria que eu te levasse para casa?
I asked her what was going on, but she wouldn’t tell me.
Perguntei o que estava acontecendo, mas ela não quis me dizer.
(I asked her in the past and she refused to tell me.)
When I was younger, I would argue with my brother all the time.
Quando eu era mais novo, eu discutia com meu irmão o tempo todo.
(It was a typical behavior in the past.)
We can use would in expressions too. Would rather is used to say we prefer
one thing to another. Most of the times, we use the contracted form, which is
“I’d rather.”
Another commonly used expression with would is “would mind.” We use it to ask for favors or permission.
But the structure is a bit different. Check it out in the following box.
Would you mind opening the window? Would you mind if I opened the window?
Você se importaria de abrir a janela? Você se importaria se eu abrisse a janela?
(Would you mind + verb in the -ING form) (Would you mind if + subject + verb in the past)
NE GATIVE SENTENCES
Basic Structures
The second is for sentences that have one auxiliary verb or a modal auxiliary. In this case, the structure
is the subject, the auxiliary or modal verb, then NOT to indicate the negative, the main verb, and the
complement.
NE GATIVE SENTENCES
Basic Structures
Subject + Auxiliary or Modal Verb + NOT + Main Verb + Complement (if necessary)
Sujeito + Verbo Auxiliar ou Modal Verb + NOT + Verbo Principal + Complemento (se necessário)
And the third is when there’s more than one auxiliary. In this case, the structure is the subject, the first
auxiliary verb followed by NOT, which indicates the negative, then the second or second and third
auxiliaries, depending on the verb form, then the main verb, and the complement.
NE G ATIVE SENTENCES
Basic Structures
Subject + First Auxiliary + NOT + Other Auxiliaries + Main Verb + Complement (if necessary)
Sujeito + Primeiro Auxiliar + NOT + Outros Auxiliares + Verbo Principal + Complemento (se necessário)
NE GATIVE SENTENCES
Imperative Structure
Don’t do this.
Não faça isso.
Besides the imperative, all verb forms in English take a subject and follow one of the
three basic structures to make the negative.
If we use the simple forms, that is, the simple present and the simple past, with
the verb to be as the main verb, we will not use an auxiliary to make negative
statements.
NE GATIVE SENTENCES
NE GATIVE SENTENCES
Some verb forms will take more than one auxiliary verb. It’s the case of the present
perfect continuous, which takes two auxiliary verbs. In this case, we’ll place the
negative particle NOT right after the first auxiliary.
NE GATIVE SENTENCES
NE GATIVE SENTENCES
Check the uses of not and no with the examples in the following box.
NE GATIVE SENTENCES
Question
Do you have any money?
Você tem algum dinheiro?
Possible Answers:
1. No, I have no money.
Não, eu não tenho dinheiro.
(The particle “no” goes before the noun “money” in an affirmative structure.)
You cannot use two negative statements ( not and no) in the same sentence.
Você não pode usar duas partículas negativas na mesma frase.
NE GATIVE SENTENCES
Now you know the basic sentence structure of the negative form in English
and how to use no and not.
my dog
meu cachorro
(It’s not your dog or his dog, it is my dog)
our house
nossa casa
(It’s not a house or a beautiful house, it is our house)
their books
os livros deles
(It’s not just any book, it is their books)
Take a look at the following table to see all the possessive adjectives in English.
Singular Plural
My Our
First person
meu(s), minha(s) nosso(s), nossa(s)
Your Your
Second person
teu(s), tua(s), seu(s), sua(s) seus, suas, de vocês
His
seu(s), sua(s), dele
Her Their
Third
person seu(s), sua(s), dela seus, suas, deles, delas
Its
seu(s), sua(s), dele, dela
For the second person, we’ll use your. This possessive adjective will
be the same for both the singular and plural forms, and only the
context will make it clear if we are referring to one or more owners.
POSSESSIVE CASE
If the context makes it clear to whose party we are referring, we can replace the
possessive case with a third person possessive adjective.
For the third person singular, we’ll use the possessive adjectives his for a masculine owner, her for feminine,
and, for other cases, we will use its.
(We used “his” because we are talking about George’s wife, and George is a man.)
(Usamos his porque estamos nos referindo à esposa do George, e George é um homem.)
(We used “her” because we are talking about Paula’s husband, and Paula is a woman.)
(Usamos her porque estamos nos referindo ao marido da Paula, e Paula é uma mulher.)
(We used “its” because we are talking about the computer keyboard, which is an object.)
(Usamos its porque estamos nos referindo ao teclado do computador, que é um objeto.)
In the third person plural, we will use their regardless of the gender.
EXPRESSING POSSESSION
The possessive case structure will only be used to refer to the third person,
either singular or plural.
POSSESSIVE CASE
POSSESSIVE CASE
Omitting the Noun
Possessive adjectives also indicate possession or belonging, and they are always
used before a noun. They are called possessive adjectives precisely because they
are placed in the same position as most adjectives in English: before the noun.
However, when it is not necessary to mention what you are talking about
because it is clear in that context or because the noun has been mentioned before
in the sentence or in the conversation, we will replace the structure possessive
adjective + noun with a possessive pronoun.
POSSESSIVE PRONOUNS
your yours
Second person seu, seus, sua, suas, seu, seus, sua, suas,
Singular teu, teus, tua, tuas teu, teus, tua, tuas
his his
dele dele
its its
dele, dela dele, dela
your yours
Second person seus, suas, vosso, vossos, seus, suas, vosso, vossos,
Plural vossa, vossas vossa, vossas
PRESENT CONTINUOUS
Structure
Affirmative
Subject + To Be + Verb in the -ING Form + Complement
I am watching a movie.
Eu estou assistindo a um filme.
Negative
Subject + To Be + Not + Verb in the -ING Form + Complement
Interrogative
To Be + Subject + Verb in the -ING Form + Complement
PRESENT CONTINUOUS
Repeated Temporary Actions and Events
PRESENT CONTINUOUS
Gradual Change
PRESENT CONTINUOUS
Future
PRESENT CONTINUOUS
Non-progressive Verbs in Continuous Forms: Different Meaning
I am seeing someone.
Eu estou saindo com alguém.
Now you know what the present continuous is all about: you’ve seen its
structure, some examples, and how to properly use it.
PRESENT PERFE CT
Subject + Have + Past Participle + (Complement)
PRESENT PERFE CT
Affirmative Sentences
For interrogative sentences, we’ll invert the order and place the auxiliary verb
before the subject.
When you ask questions in the present perfect, it’s very common to use the
adverb ever to ask if something has happened at any time before now.
PRESENT PERFE CT
Interrogative Sentences
PRESENT PERFE CT
Negative Sentences
Now that we’ve seen the structures, let’s check the use. The main use of the present perfect
is to talk about things that happened or started in the past but are connected to the present
either by relevance or continuity.
Most of the time, it is the speaker’s choice to focus on the past action, using the simple past, or
on the relevance it has to the present moment, choosing the present perfect.
Analyze the comparison of these two tenses in context.
Simple Past
The simple past focuses on the past event, and not on any eventual connection
between this past action and the present moment.
O simple past foca no evento passado, e não em alguma possível conexão que possa
haver entre esse evento passado e o momento presente.
Last year, I traveled to Europe and visited many museums. It was an amazing trip.
Ano passado, eu viajei para a Europa e visitei muitos museus. Foi uma viagem incrível.
(the focus is only on the past action)
The present perfect highlights that there is a connection between something that
happened in the past and the present moment.
O present perfect destaca que há uma conexão entre algo que aconteceu no passado e o
momento presente
Visiting so many museums has changed my view of the world. I’ve learned a lot.
Visitar tantos museus mudou a minha visão de mundo. Eu aprendi muito.
(The focus is on the relationship between a past action and present moment: I’m a
different person now because of a past action)
It’s important to notice that, when the speaker chooses to use the present perfect,
the relevance of that past action to the present might be implicit in the context.
Another important thing: we never use the present perfect with time adverbs that
refer to specific moments in the past, such as yesterday, last year, or last month.
When we choose to use the present perfect, the focus is on the consequence,
relevance, or continuity that a past action has in the present, so saying when it
happened is unimportant and even wrong.
It doesn’t mean that you don’t know when it happened, but this is not what you want
to highlight. Adverbs that refer to specific moments in the past are mostly used with
the simple past or the past continuous.
There are other adverbs used with the present perfect that highlight its connection
to the present either by relevance or continuity. When we use the present perfect to
describe an action that is connected to the present by continuity, we frequently
use the adverbs never or always or some adverbial phrases.
Besides never and always, there are other adverbs of time commonly used with
the present perfect. Check some examples:
And now you know the structure and uses of the present perfect.
Structure: Subject + Have/Has + Been + Main Verb (in the -ING form) + Complement
For interrogative sentences, the auxiliary have is placed before the subject.
Structure: Have/Has + Subject + Been + Main Verb (in the -ING form) + Complement
In negative sentences, we place the negative particle not after the auxiliary verb have.
Structure: Subject + Have/Has + NOT + Been + Main Verb (in the -ING form) + Complement
We can use the present perfect continuous to talk about repeated events that started in the past and keep on
repeating until now.
I’ve been going to the United States every year since my kid was born.
Eu tenho ido para os Estados Unidos todo ano desde que o meu filho nasceu.
(It is something I started doing in the past, when my kid was born, and I repeat it every year).
And now you know the structure of the present perfect continuous and how to use it.
The structure for direct questions is the question word followed by the
interrogative form, and it can be used with different verb forms.
In the simple present, we can use how with the verb to be or with other verbs.
The difference is that when the verb to be is the main verb, we do not use an
auxiliary verb. For all the other verbs, an auxiliary must be used to create the
questions.
Check out some examples:
How can also be used in the simple past, and the structure will follow the same
pattern of the simple present. The difference is that the verb to be or the auxiliary
verb will be conjugated in the past.
Structure: How + Auxiliary Verb + Subject + Main Verb in the Base Form +
Complement (if necessary)
The question word how can also be used with continuous forms such as the
present and the past continuous. In this case, we’ll use how followed by the
interrogative form of these structures.
For the interrogative form of the present and past continuous, the verb to be
works as an auxiliary verb, followed by the subject, the main verb in the -ING
form, and a complement, if necessary.
It is also possible to use how with perfect forms such as the present perfect and
the present perfect continuous.
If you want to ask more specific questions using how, you can use an
adjective or an adverb after it. Check out the examples.
How much is this T-shirt? How many people were there at the concert?
Quanto custa esta camiseta? Quantas pessoas havia no show?
(How + Much = Amount or Price) (How + Many = Quantity)
How long does it take to get there? How tall is your brother?
Qual tempo demora para chegar lá? Qual é a altura do seu irmão?
(How + Long = Duration) (How + Tall = Height for People)
HOW ABOUT
Offers and Suggestions
HOW ABOUT
Reason and Surprise (Informal)
How + Adjective
How beautiful!
Que bonito!
(How + Adjective “beautiful”)
And now you know different ways to use the question word how, it’s meaning, structures in
different verb forms, as well as how to use it in exclamations.
When
Quando
Check out some examples of when used in direct and indirect questions:
Structure: When + Auxiliary Verb + Subject + Main Verb in the Base Form +
Complement (if necessary)
We can use when with continuous forms such as the present continuous to
indicate actions in the future.
PRESENT PERFECT
Structure: When + Verb To Have + Subject +
Main Verb in the Past Participle + Complement (if necessary)
QUESTION WORDS
Specific Time
And now you know what a question word is and how to use the question
word when with different verb forms.
SIMPLE PRESENT
The basic structure for the affirmative form is the SVC structure, that is, subject,
main verb, and complement. And the verb conjugation works like this: we’ll use the
base form of the verb for all persons, except for the third person singular. In this
case, we’ll add –S, –ES, or –IES to the end of the verb, depending on how it’s spelled.
SIMPLE PRESENT
Affirmative Form
Singular Plural
He works here.
Ele trabalha aqui.
Notice that we do not use the auxiliary verb in the affirmative form. But it’s possible to use it to
add emphasis to a statement. In that case, the auxiliary verb is placed before the main verb.
SIMPLE PRESENT
Affirmative Form: Adding Emphasis
(The verb “do” is used as an auxiliary. So it does not have a meaning, but a function).
(O verbo “do” é usado como auxiliar. Portanto, não tem um significado, mas uma função).
SIMPLE PRESENT
Negative Form
Singular Plural
SIMPLE PRESENT
Interrogative Form
Singular Plural
SIMPLE PRESENT
Other Verbs – Uses
First you read the questions, then you have to mark the correct statement.
Primeiro você lê as perguntas, depois você tem que marcar a afirmação correta.
The simple present can convey the idea of immediacy and drama, and that’s why it’s commonly
used in stories or novels, in sports broadcasting, and in newspaper headlines, even when
reporting past events.
SIMPLE PRESENT
Other Verbs – Uses
She crosses the street toward him, looks back, and decides to let it go.
Ela atravessa a rua em direção a ele, olha para trás e decide deixar para lá.
He gets the ball, passes through the defense and shoots, but the goalkeeper saves it.
Ele pega a bola, passa pela defesa e chuta, mas o goleiro agarra.
SIMPLE PRESENT
Non-progressive Verbs
And now you know the structure and the most common uses of the simple present.
SIMPLE PRESENT
SIMPLE PRESENT
Verb To Be
Singular Plural
First person I am We are
Second person You are You are
Third person He/She/It is They are
SIMPLE PRESENT
Verb To Be
Affirmative
Subject + Verb To Be + Complement
I’m a writer.
Eu sou escritor.
Negative
Subject + Verb To Be + NOT + Complement
I am not a writer.
Eu não sou escritor.
Interrogative
Verb To Be + Subject + Complement
SIMPLE PRESENT
Verb To Be – Uses
Name
I am Sophie. My name is Sophie.
Eu sou Sophie. O meu nome é Sophie.
Profession Age
I am an architect. I am 36 years old.
Eu sou arquiteta. Eu tenho 36 anos.
SIMPLE PRESENT
Verb To Be – Uses
I am thirsty.
Eu estou com sede.
(It’s a state. Something I am experiencing now.)
I am skinny.
Eu sou magro(a).
(It refers to a physical characteristic.)
SIMPLE PRESENT
Verb To Be – Uses
The verb to be in the simple present is also used to talk about time and dates.
SIMPLE PRESENT
Verb To Be – Uses
We can use the verb to be in the simple present to refer to places and locations as well.
SIMPLE PRESENT
Verb To Be – Uses
And now you know when and why we use the verb to be in the simple present.
SUBJE CT PRONOUNS
Singular Plural
I we
First person
eu nós
you you
Second person
tu/você vós/vocês
he
ele ( pessoa)
she they
Third person
ela ( pessoa) eles/elas
it
ele/ela (exceto pessoas)
Let’s start analyzing the first person pronouns, the ones that refer to the person
who is talking.
The first person singular pronoun (I) is always written with a capital letter,
regardless of its position in the sentence. Capitalization does not happen with
any other pronoun in English, not even with the first person plural (we).
I am her friend.
Eu sou amigo(a) dela.
(first person singular pronoun I) We are friends.
Nós somos amigos.
(first person plural pronoun we)
For the second person, the subject pronoun you will be used both in the singular
and in the plural. You always refers to the person or the people you are talking to.
Therefore, the context will tell you whether it is singular or plural.
SUBJE CT PRONOUNS
Second Person
SUBJE CT PRONOUNS
Third Person Singular (He/She)
For all the other cases, we will use the other third person singular pronoun, it;
that is, to talk about any other thing in the singular.
SUBJE CT PRONOUN
Third Person Singular (It)
Notice that, in the examples we have just seen, the reference of the pronoun it is
clear in the sentence. It refers to the computer in the first example, and to the TV in
the second one.
But the pronoun it will also be used as a subject in sentences that have an
impersonal subject. This impersonal use of it introduces new information, and it is
used particularly to talk about time, dates, the weather, and opinion.
When it has an impersonal function, it does not refer to a previously mentioned
noun. In this case, the pronoun it simply works as the subject of the sentence.
SUBJE CT PRONOUN
Third Person Singular (It)
It’s late.
Está tarde.
(third person singular neutral pronoun it impersonal subject)
For the third person plural, there is only one pronoun: they. This is the plural form of the pronouns he, she,
and it—meaning this pronoun can be used to refer both to people and objects.
SUBJE CT PRONOUN
Third Person Plural (They)
THERE + TO BE
Structures
Affirmative
There + To Be
Interrogative
To Be + There
Negative
There + To Be + Not
THERE + TO BE
Singular and Plural
When we talk about singular or plural forms, there are some things to which we should pay
attention. If you are talking about a list of things, use there is when the noun that follows is
also in the singular.
If there are one or more nouns in the plural, use there are and place the nouns in the plural
before the ones in the singular, if there are any.
THERE + TO BE
Singular and Plural
There are some apples, two bananas, and a pineapple in the fruit basket.
Tem algumas maçãs, duas bananas e um abacaxi na fruteira.
(There are One or more nouns in the plural)
THERE + TO BE
Informal Spoken Language
We have seen some uses of there + To Be in the present. However, it is important to highlight
that this structure can also be used in the past and in the future.
So we will conjugate the verb to be accordingly. If we are referring to the past, we use there
was for the singular and there were for the plural.
THERE + TO BE
Past: There Was / There Were
To use there + To Be in the future, we’ll use there will be with singular or plural
THERE + TO BE
Future: There Will Be
THERE + TO BE
Modal Verbs
We can also use there with verbs such as seem and tend before to be. In these
cases, we’ll use the infinitive form to be.
SUPERL ATIVES
Two-syllable Adjectives – Exceptions
And now you know what there + To Be means, its structures, and how to use it.
WILL
Structure
Affirmative
Negative
Interrogative
It won’t rain.
Não vai chover.
WILL
Uses
WILL
Uses
Promises
WILL
Uses
Refusal
WILL
Inevitability