Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ISSN: 2278-0181
Vol. 2 Issue 4, April - 2013
Failure Mode Effect Analysis(FMEA) to adopt of outer ring. After that cause-effect matrix
the innovative technologies integrated with the study were done. From the cause-effect matrix
operational aspects in order to enhance the according to the importance to the customer
process capability. The main objective of the some input steps required for operation were
study is to improve machinery system selected. Since the critically important steps
reliability and to enhance operational safety for the capability enhancement for grinding
concept of CNC grinding machine. machine precautions are extremely vital.
Therefore this paper utilized the Failure Mode
Effect Analysis (FMEA) approach to
Key words: Process capability (cpk), Failure formulate satisfactory solutions to prevent
Mode Effect Analysis (FMEA) Track capability index (cpk) to come down. The
Grinding, Risk Priority Number(RPN), potential risk associated to the grinding
machine performance clarified based on
1. Introduction: FMEA. Hence the significance of the proposed
In order to evaluate & optimise the idea lay to the transforming of operational
grinding machine performance, we must focus feedback and evidences to prevention action
on the entire grinding process. A grinding against machine performance.
machine is much more difficult to control than The organisation of this paper given as
other machining process. this section begins with motivating
The case study was carried out in the information on the paper. In section 2, a brief
bearing manufacturing company. The product introduction to FMEA is given. In section 3,
taken under consideration was Outer Ring of the application of the FMEA on to the process
TRB (Taper Roller Bearing) which consists of capability index enhancement for CNC
four parts as Outer ring, inner ring, outer cage, grinding machine. In section 4 the conclusion
& Tapered ball. The problem statement was remarks are expressed.
for channel No.3 at TRB section at company
www.ijert.org 1859
International Journal of Engineering Research & Technology (IJERT)
ISSN: 2278-0181
Vol. 2 Issue 4, April - 2013
team to identify potential failure modes based occurred problem with available monitoring
on the past experience with similar product or system before component/system is damaged
process or problem, enabling the team to and stopped.
design those failures out of the system with the
minimum of efforts and resource expenditure The RPN is generated by taking the product of
thereby reducing development time and cost. It three index (occurrence, severity, detection) on
is widely used in manufacturing industries in the scale from 1-10 for each one . Hence RPN
various phases of product life cycle. Applying number will decide the seriousness of potential
FMEA involves number of steps starting from risks critical to safety of system or
analysis of product, process or system in every productivity of process.
single part, list of process steps, process
inputs, then list of identified potential failures, RPN=S*O*D
evaluation of their frequency of
occuranace,severity(Its effect on FMEA document shows a list of items that
process/product/system and to its surroundings identified:- (i)Process steps (ii) Process inputs
in case of failure) and their detection (iii) potential failure mode(iv) potential effect
FMEA should be initiated by the of failure(v)potential causes/mechanisms of
design engineering for the hardware approach failure(vi)Severity index (vii)Occurrence
and the system engineering for the functional index (viii) Detection index (ix) Risk Priority
approach. Once the initial FMEA has been Number. Table 1-3 shows quantitative scales
completed, the entire engineering team should commonly used for the occurrence, severity
participate in review process. FMEA cannot be and delectability index.
www.ijert.org 1860
International Journal of Engineering Research & Technology (IJERT)
ISSN: 2278-0181
Vol. 2 Issue 4, April - 2013
TABLE: 1
RATING EFFECT SEVERITY OF EFFECT
TABLE: 2
RATING PROBABILITY POSSIBLE FAILURE RATE
OF
OCCURANCE
10 Very High: More than one occurrence per day
9 High: One occurrence every three to four days
8 High: One occurrence per week
7 High: One occurrence every month
6 Moderately High: One occurrence every three months
5 Moderate: One occurrence every six months to one year
4 Moderately Low: One occurrence per year
3 Low: One occurrence every one to three years
2 Low: One occurrence every three to five years
1 Remote: One occurrence in greater than five years
www.ijert.org 1861
International Journal of Engineering Research & Technology (IJERT)
ISSN: 2278-0181
Vol. 2 Issue 4, April - 2013
TABLE: 3
RATING PROBABILITY POSSIBLE FAILURE RATE
OF
OCCURANCE
10 Very High: More than one occurrence per day
9 High: One occurrence every three to four days
8 High: One occurrence per week
7 High: One occurrence every month
6 Moderately High: One occurrence every three months
5 Moderate: One occurrence every six months to one
year
4 Moderately Low: One occurrence per year
3 Low: One occurrence every one to three years
2 Low: One occurrence every three to five years
1 Remote: One occurrence in greater than five years
3. APPLICATION
4000 60
www.ijert.org 1862
International Journal of Engineering Research & Technology (IJERT)
ISSN: 2278-0181
Vol. 2 Issue 4, April - 2013
The process capability is an important pressure, ,work head rpm , roller screw
concept for industrial people to understand condition for cross-slide movement, cutting
how well a process can produce acceptable speed ratio, grinding compensation, grinding
product. As a result, a manager or engineering compensation interval, dressing interval and
can prioritize needed process improvements dressing arm repeatability dressing play, work
and identify those processes that do not need head pulley,dimond height, shoe condition,
immediate process improvement. The process and spindle nose condition. These inputs are
capability study indicates if a process is further selected for FMEA. Although great
capable of producing virtually all conforming efforts have been made to maintain & improve
product. If the process is capable then the performance of grinding machine, it can
statistical process control can be used to not be entirely controlled. It can be minimised
monitor the process and conventional by implementing new maintenance regimes,
acceptance efforts can be reduce or eliminated integrating advance technologies in to system
entirely. This not only yields great cost savings comply with company rules and regulation and
in eliminating non-value added inspection but other safeguards. The causality nature should
also eliminate scrape, rework and increase the be identified via using evidence & past
customer satisfaction. experience. Recalling historical development
background of capability enhancement of
CNC grinding machine grinds the similar type of machine will help to a great
track diameter (Inner diameter) of outer ring of extent. The operational survey conducted
TRB. From the process map analysis different hereby guides this study in order to structure
input parameters required for the track the methodological procedure based on
RRTT
grinding which affect the output.(i.e. Track dia FMEA.
of ring)is selected. The selected various inputs
from process map carried further for the cause
IIJJEE
www.ijert.org 1863
International Journal of Engineering Research & Technology (IJERT)
ISSN: 2278-0181
Vol. 2 Issue 4, April - 2013
Grinding Cutting speed Speed ratio Ovality Spindle speed & w/h 8 5 6 240
process ratio not achieved problem speed not set
Grinding Grinding Uneven Size variation Values not set as per 8 3 9 216
process compensation grinding chart
Grinding Dressing Uneven Size variation Values not set as per 8 3 9 216
process compensation grinding chart
Grinding Grinding Cycle time Cycle time & Values not set as per 8 3 9 216
process compensation and wheel wheel chart
interval consumption consumption
increases
Dressing Dressing arm Uneven Chatter on Life of sensor & its 7 3 10 210
up/down dressing surface accuracy
sensor
RRTT
Ring Clamping Clamping Size variation Pressure regulators not 8 4 6 192
clamping/De pressure pressure not working
IIJJEE
clamping ok
Dressing Dressing play Uneven Visual defect Mounting for dressing 7 5 5 175
dressing and ovality not ok
Work head Work head Sleeping of Size variation Rpm not reached 7 3 8 168
rpm pulley belt
Grinding Spindle nose Spindle nose Size variation Lack of maintenance 7 3 5 105
process condition run out more
than10 micron
www.ijert.org 1864
International Journal of Engineering Research & Technology (IJERT)
ISSN: 2278-0181
Vol. 2 Issue 4, April - 2013
www.ijert.org 1865
International Journal of Engineering Research & Technology (IJERT)
ISSN: 2278-0181
Vol. 2 Issue 4, April - 2013
www.ijert.org 1866
International Journal of Engineering Research & Technology (IJERT)
ISSN: 2278-0181
Vol. 2 Issue 4, April - 2013
Bartlett's Test
430
Test Statistic
P-Value
75.89
0.000
After corrective action taken on each failure
Lev ene's Test
470
Test Statistic
P-Value
9.44
0.000
mode their respective RPN number drop down
490
considerably. Consequently FMEA for
WH RPM
550
capability enhancement aid us to produce
561
precautions both in operational and system
664
design levels to prevent the risk.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
95% Bonferroni Confidence Intervals for StDevs After all corrective action completed data was
collected for the track diameter and new
Figure7:Test for equal variance improved capability index(cpk) got i.e.1.37.As
shown in the fig.8
STB : OR Tr. Dia.:After Data
LSL USL
95% Bonferroni confidence intervals for LS L
P rocess D ata
-57
Within
Ov erall
Target *
www.ijert.org 1867
International Journal of Engineering Research & Technology (IJERT)
ISSN: 2278-0181
Vol. 2 Issue 4, April - 2013
References:
1. Antony, Jiju. "Pros and cons of Six
Sigma: an academic perspective".
Archived from the original on July 23,
2008. Retrieved September 20, 2011.
www.ijert.org 1868