Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1 - SEPTEMBER 5, 2022
TOPIC: CONTEXT AND ISSUES OF RA 1425
1. Compare and contrast the views of those in favor and those against RA 1425.
Considering the context of the1950’s, would similar arguments have force today?
Fast forward to the future, after more than a century, the name Jose Rizal remains to be relevant and
widely known. With his vast influence in the history of the Philippines, a law, specifically, RA
1425was proposed by Senator Claro M. Recto. Until this day, this law is still being enforced —
continuing the mandatory inclusion of Rizal’s life and work in the curricula of public and private
schools. RA 1425 was successfully signed and approved into effectivity. However, in the early days,
it received major criticisms from numerous people and groups. Firstly, the views of the supporters of
RA 1425 are primarily founded on the understanding of the great nationalism and patriotism that
could be ignited in the young minds of the country through Jose Rizal. They further explain that
implementing the law would give remarkable results. It will be a great source of insights about
current problems, life lessons, and inspiration. Additionally, it would also substantially help the
youth discover and define their identity as Filipinos and encourage critical thinking. Evidently, they
have highlighted the multiple advantages that reflect the values and beliefs that the
Philippines constantly uphold. Similarly, the Roman Catholic church, Sen. Decoroso Rosales, and
many others who oppose the law establish their argument according to the country’s prominent
principles. The Philippines is a religious country. Thus, the people have serious respect
for the church and its practices. For this reason, the disparity between their opinions lies in the
claim that RA 1425 violates Filipino religious freedom. In terms of arbitration, the bill did not receive
unanimous approval. The bill's passage has been hampered by opponents, particularly Catholic religious
groups. Former Senator Claro M. Recto is the bill’s author, while former Senator Jose P. Laurel is a co-
sponsor purpose of the proposed bill, according to those who supported and fought for it to pass, is to
encourage dedication to the ideals of freedom, patriotism, and nationalism for which our heroes have lived,
fought, and died. clerics are harmed by the novels Noli Me Tangere and El Filibusterismo. On the other
hand, some claim that José P. Rizal's writings alienate readers and contradict numerous Christian principles.
They further claimed that the novels contain parts that are incompatible with the student’s beliefs, in
violation of Article III, Section I, clause VII of the Constitution. On the other hand, supporters of the law
claim that it is important to commemorate our heroes’ lives and works with great fondness and dedication
since they shape our national character. They also said that José Rizal's life and writings are a wonderful
example of nationalism. They said that the Rizal Law would assist young Filipinos in a variety of ways,
including gaining other attributes like courage and determination from Rizal's patriotism, which would help
boost nation-building and Filipino identity
IN FAVOR AGAINST
COMPARE THEY AIM TO TEACH THE THEY BELIEVE THAT
FILIPINO YOUTH OR EVEN WITHOUT RIZAL’S
STUDENTS ABOUT SUBJECT IN SCHOOL, HE
NATIONALISM STILL BE RECOGNIZED AS
A HERO AND NOTHING
WILL CHANGE THAT.
CONTRAST IT IS NECESSARY TO IT'S NOT NECESSARY TO
READ THE NOVELS OF READ JOSE RIZAL’S
JOSE RIZAL TO OPEN OUR NOVELS, KNOWING THAT
MINDS ABOUT UNJUST THERE ARE OTHER
AND DETERIORATING HEROES WHO ALSO
SPANIARDS COLONIAL SACRIFICE FOR THE SAKE
POWER. OF FREEDOM.
COMPARE THEY BELIEVE THAT SEN.RODRIGO TOGETHER
THROUGH RIZAL’S WITH THE ROMAN
WRITINGS AND SELF- CATHOLIC CHURCH
SACRIFICE IS A MUST TO OFFICIALS AGAINST WITH
SHARE WITH THE THIS BILL BECAUSE THE
STUDENTS UP UNTIL NOVEL NOLI ME
COLLEGE TANGERE HAS NEGATIVE
VIEWS TO THE CATHOLIC
CHURCH
CONTRAST SEN. RECTO BELIEVED SEN. RODRIGO OPPOSED
THAT RIZAL EXPOSED AND BELIEVED THAT
THE HIDDEN DOINGS OF RIZAL IS ANTI-CATHOLIC
CATHOLIC OFFICIALS, TO AND THE BILL VIOLATES
SHOW THE PRESENTS THE FREEDOM OF
CONDITIONS OF THE CONSCIENCE AND
CATHOLIC CHURCH AT RELIGION.
THAT TIME.