INDIVIDUAL PLAN COMMMITMENT REVIEW FORM (IPCRF)
Name: MOHANI A. PAGUITAL
Position: SENIOR EDUCATION PROGRAM SPECIALIST
Review Period January - December, 2022
Division: Governance and Operation Division
MFO KRAs OBJECTIVES
BASIC QUALITY 1. Provided assistance and
EDUCATION
MANAGEMENT support in the preparation and
SERVICES
SYSTEM implementation of advocacy
campaign programs to increase
resource support for basic
education within the year
2.        Provided assistance in
monitoring progress and outcome
of two (2) projects and partners to
identify areas for continous
improvement and sustaining
partnerships within the year.
3.    Facilitated the approval of
Memorandum of
Agreement/Understanding to
the SDS within the year
Name of Rater: MAYFLOR D. ROMUALDO
Position: Chief E.S, SGOD
Date of Review:
Weight PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL RESULTS
TIME LINE RATING SCORE
per KRA (Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness) Q E T
Jan- Dec 2022 Evidence showed that advocacy campaign programs, monitoring progress and outcomes,
and final draft of MOA/MOU are within standards
5 - Prepared and implemented effectively advocacy programs to increase awareness of
stakeholders and gather resource support for basic education ahead of time
4 - Prepared and implemented effectively advocacy programs to increase awareness of
15%
stakeholders and gather resource support for basic education on time
3 - Prepared an advocacy programs to increase awareness of stakeholders and gather
resource support for basic education on time but late in implementation.
2 - Prepared an advocacy programs to increase awareness of stakeholders and gather
resource support for basic education but without implementation done.
1 - No preparation and implementation done.
Jan- Dec 2017 20% 5 - Submitted comprehensive reports on the results of progress monitoring and projects
outcome ahead of time
4 - Submitted comprehensive reports on the results of progress monitoring and projects
outcome on time
3 - Submitted comprehensive reports on the result of progress monitoring and projects
outcome very satisfactorily but late on time.
2 - Submitted reports on the results of progress monitoring and projects outcome with
errors and corrections and late on time.
1 - Submitted reports on the results of progress monitoring and projects outcome with
major errors and late on time.
Jan- Dec 2017 10% 5 - Facilitated very satisfactory MOA/Understanding and submitted ahead of time.
4 - Facilitated very satisfactory MOA/Understanding and submitted on due date.
3 - Facilitated very satisfactory MOA/Understanding and submitted late.
2 - Facilitated satisfactory MOA/Understanding and submitted very late.
1 - There was no final draft of MOA/understanding.

MFO KRAs OBJECTIVES
QUALITY 1. Gathered data and
MANAGEMENT provided support in the
SYSTEM preparation and submission of
report of findings on
implementation of quality on
School Based Management &
implementation of programs and
projects as basis for continous
improvement quarterly
TECHNICAL 1. Assisted in the provision of
ASSISTANCE Technical Assistance to schools
and learning centers by
responding to the identified
needs of the schools and
learning centers in relation to
social mobilization and
resourcing within the school
year.
HEALTH 1. Assisted in monitoring
NUTRITION physical and mental well being
PROGRAM and readiness of learners to
SERVICES learn by providing Health and
Nutrition Services and School
Feeding Program within the
school year.
Plus Factor Membership to technical
working group and committee
within the school year
* To get the score, the rating is multiples by the weight assigned.
Weight PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL RESULTS
TIME LINE RATING SCORE
per KRA (Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness) Q E T
Jan- Dec 2017 15% 5 - Prepared report/documents on best practices with regards quality management
system, progrms and projects submitted ahead of time
4 - Prepared report/documents on best practices with regards quality management
system, progrms and projects submitted on time
3 -Prepared report/documents on best practices with regards quality management system,
progrms and projects submitted on time but late in implementation.
2 - Prepared an advocacy programs to increase awareness of stakeholders and gather
resource support for basic education but without implementation done.
1 - Prepared report/documents on best practices with regards quality management
system, progrms and projects submitted with errors and corrections but submitted
Jan- Dec 2017 15% Evidence showed that TA provided willl respond to the needs of the schools or learning
centers in relation to social mobilization, and governance and operations.
5 - Provided quality and appropriate TA to 4 schools or learning centers in relation to
social mobilization, governance and operations within a year
4 - Provided quality and appropriate TA to 3 schools or learning centers in relation to
social mobilization, governance and operations within a year.
3 - Provided quality and appropriate TA to 2 schools or learning centers in relation to
social mobilization, governance and operations within a year.
2- Provided quality and appropriate TA to 1 schools or learning centers in relation to
social mobilization, governance and operations within a year
1 - There was no TA provided to schools or learning centers in relation to social
mobilization, governance and operations within a year.
Jan- Dec 2017 5- Monitored 5 schools on Health and Nutrition program services and sustainable feeding
program
4- Monitored 4 schools on Health and Nutrition program services and sustainable feeding
program
3- Monitored 3 schools on Health and Nutrition program services and sustainable feeding
15% program
2- Monitored 2 schools on Health and Nutrition program services and sustainable feeding
program
1- Monitored 1 schools on Health and Nutrition program services and sustainable feeding
program
10%
OVERALL RATING
FOR
ACCOMPLISHMENTS
 Weight PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL RESULTS
MFO KRAs OBJECTIVES TIME LINE RATING SCORE
per KRA (Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness) Q E T
MAYFLOR D. ROMUALDO JUNAFLOR R. SUCALDITO
Rater Ratee