Page
1
INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW
FORM
Name of Employee: JED A. NIEVES
Position: Education Program Specialist II – SMM & E
Review Period: January 2022 – December 2022
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: Schools Division of Zamboanga del Norte
TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING
MFO’S KRA’S OBJECTIVES
Basic Education QUALITY 1. To assist in gathering data
Services MANAGEMENT and provide technical
SYSTEM support in implementing
quality management system
to wit:
1.1. Assisted in Preparing and
submission of report of
findings on implementation of
quality assurance processes
on:
a. School Planning/
SIP/ESRC;
b. School Based
Management
c. Implementation of
Programs and Projects as
basis for continuous
improvement.
1.2. Assisted in defining the
approach and methods to
validate SDO report on
Schools Achievement and
Learning outcomes and
submit reoprt on findings.
1.3. Assisted in Monitoring of
Name of Rater: WILSON H. INDING
Position: SEPS/ SMM&E
Date of Review: December 31, 2022
TO BE FILLED IN DURING
EVALUATION
TIMELINE WEIGHT PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL RESULTS RATING SCORE*
PER (Quality, Efficiency,
KRA Q E T Ave
Timeliness)
QUALITY
Jan – Dec 40 %
2023 5 - 86-100% of the physical and financial
targets in the unit AIP are achieved;
4 - 76-85% of the physical and financial
targets in the unit AIP are achieved;
3 - 66-75% of the physical and financial
targets in the unit AIP are achieved;
2 - 51-65% of the physical and financial
targets in the unit AIP are achieved;
1 - 50% Below, of the physical and
financial targets in the unit AIP are
achieved
EFFICIENCY
5 – 5 systems are established to
implement, monitor and evaluate the
PAPs
4 – 4 systems are established to
implement, monitor and evaluate the
PAPs
TIMELINESS
5 – Communicated the results/data at
least before scheduled deadline
4- Communicated the results
within on scheduled deadline
3 – Communicated the results/data on
Schedule or deadline
2 – Communicated data after scheduled
Page

2 performance of the Schools deadline

1 – Never at all
Division along:
a.TA to Schools and LCs
b. Equitable Distribution of
educational resources to
schools and LCs and submit
reports to be able to identify
areas for improvement.
1.4. Assisted in Preparing
report/documents on best
practices with regard school
management and
governance for sharing and
benchmarking purposes and
inputs to recognition.

2. To assist in gathering data,

submit assessment report/s for
Jan – Dec 15 % QUALITY
Page
3
ASSESSMENT policy recommendation and for 2023
continuous improvement to wit:
2.1 Assisted in designing
the approach and
methods for gathering
data and prepare a
report on the monitoring
and evaluation result of
the implementation of
Division assessment
program aligned to
national assessment
framework;
2.2 Assisted in validating
and authenticating
assessment strategies
and tools for utilization
by schools, in
classrooms and learning
center and submit report
to SDO management on
its utilization and result
of utilization.
2.3 Assisted in preparing
and submission of
reports on assessment
results for tracking
learner progress and for
grading purpose to
establish validity and
reliability of method.
2.4 Assisted in conducting
monitoring and
evaluation of the
conduct of national,
regional and division
assessment tests to
5 – Performed all indicators
4 – Performed indicators but one was not
3 – Performed indicators but two were
not
2 – Performed indicators but three were
not
1 – Performed indicators but four were
not or none at all
QUALITY
5 - 86-100% of the physical and financial
targets in the unit AIP are achieved;
4 - 76-85% of the physical and financial
targets in the unit AIP are achieved;
3 - 66-75% of the physical and financial
targets in the unit AIP are achieved;
2 - 51-65% of the physical and financial
targets in the unit AIP are achieved;
1 - 50% Below, of the physical and
financial targets in the unit AIP are
achieved
EFFICIENCY
5 – 5 systems are established to
implement, monitor and evaluate the
PAPs
4 – 4 systems are established to
implement, monitor and evaluate the
PAPs
3 – 3 systems are established to
implement, monitor and evaluate the
PAPs ;
2 – 2 systems are established to
implement, monitor and evaluate the
PAPs ;
1 – 1 system is established to
implement, monitor and evaluate the unit
PAPs ;
TIMELINESS
Page

4
identify issues and 5 – Communicated the results/data at
concerns arising and least before scheduled deadline
help improve the 4- Communicated the results
within on scheduled deadline
process. 3 – Communicated the results/data on
2.5 Assisted in preparing Schedule or deadline
2 – Communicated data after scheduled
and implementing the deadline
process for monitoring 1 – Never at all

and evaluating the

organizational
effectiveness of the
schools division office
and submit a report to
document process and
recommendations for
continuous
improvement.

3. To assist in obtaining 100%

compliance to standards over
the requests of public and
private schools, vis-a-vis,
3.1. Assisted in Renewing of Jan – Dec 15%
PTO of 30 private 2023
schools; QUALITY
Page

5
SCHOOL 3.2. Assisted in validating of
COMPLIANCE TO documents of schools 5 - 86-100% of the physical and financial
QUALITY requesting Permit To targets in the unit AIP are achieved;

STANDARDS Operate; 4 - 76-85% of the physical and financial

(Public and 3.3. Assisted in Conducting targets in the unit AIP are achieved;

Private) of Information, 3 - 66-75% of the physical and financial

Education and targets in the unit AIP are achieved;

Advocacy Programs 2 - 51-65% of the physical and financial

and Materials for targets in the unit AIP are achieved;

Accreditation 1 - 50% Below, of the physical and

Standards; financial targets in the unit AIP are
achieved
3.4. Assisted in the
endorsement of
EFFICIENCY
Request for School
Fees Increase; 5 – 5 systems are established to
implement, monitor and evaluate the
3.5. Assisted in processing PAPs
and endorsing of 4 – 4 systems are established to
implement, monitor and evaluate the
Special Order PAPs
applications of 14 non-
3 – 3 systems are established to
DepEd schools; implement, monitor and evaluate the
3.6. Assisted in endorsing PAPs ;
2 – 2 systems are established to
documents for implement, monitor and evaluate the
Establishment/Integrati PAPs ;

on of Schools and 1 – 1 system is established to

Conversion of School implement, monitor and evaluate the unit
PAPs ;
into an Implementing
Unit (Pre-Evaluation),
TIMELINESS
all of which require:
A. Issued relevant 5 – Communicated the results/data at
least before scheduled deadline
Memoranda to 4- Communicated the results
communicate all within on scheduled deadline
3 – Communicated the results/data on
concerned Schedule or deadline
B. Conducted Initial 2 – Communicated data after scheduled
deadline
evaluation of 1 – Never at all
application documents
C. Communicated results
of initial evaluation of
Page

6
documents
D. Finalized evaluation of
documents
E. Conduct of ocular
inspection, whenever
applicable
F. Endorsement of
documents to RO or to
any other entity for
action or for approval
G. Transmittal of acted
documents or issued
certificate from the
approving office to the
concerned school

4. To conduct action research

related to SBM, to wit:
4.1 Assisted in Crafting
research manuscript
4.2 Assisted in developing
questionnaires and tools Jan – Dec 5%
4.3 assisted in the 2023
presentation of the reasech
RESEARCH AND materials for TA to the panel
DEVELOPMENT 4.4 Assisted in QUALITY
Page
7
administration of the
research survey
4.5 Assisted in presentation
of results to the DRC
5. To assist in providing
substantial and procedural
technical assistance to
schools and learning
centers relative to their
accreditation requests,
participation to
assessments, and other
areas covered by QMS and
TECHNICAL
ASSISTANCE TO compliance to standards,
SCHOOLS AND thru:
5 - 86-100% of the physical and financial
targets in the unit AIP are achieved;
4 - 76-85% of the physical and financial
targets in the unit AIP are achieved;
3 - 66-75% of the physical and financial
targets in the unit AIP are achieved;
2 - 51-65% of the physical and financial
targets in the unit AIP are achieved;
1 - 50% Below, of the physical and
financial targets in the unit AIP are
achieved
EFFICIENCY
5 – 5 systems are established to
implement, monitor and evaluate the
PAPs
4 – 4 systems are established to
implement, monitor and evaluate the
PAPs
3 – 3 systems are established to
implement, monitor and evaluate the
PAPs ;
2 – 2 systems are established to
implement, monitor and evaluate the
PAPs ;
1 – 1 system is established to
implement, monitor and evaluate the unit
PAPs ;
TIMELINESS
5 – Communicated the results/data at
least before scheduled deadline
4- Communicated the results
within on scheduled deadline
3 – Communicated the results/data on
Schedule or deadline
2 – Communicated data after scheduled
deadline
1 – Never at all
20 %
Jan – Dec
2023
QUALITY
Page

8
LEARNING 5.2. Assisted in Providing 5 - 86-100% of the physical and financial
CENTER individualized/walk-in targets in the unit AIP are achieved;
tecnical assistance 4 - 76-85% of the physical and financial
targets in the unit AIP are achieved;
support services; 3 - 66-75% of the physical and financial
5.3. Assisted in Providing targets in the unit AIP are achieved;
2 - 51-65% of the physical and financial
relevant TA through the targets in the unit AIP are achieved;
use of technology as 1 - 50% Below, of the physical and
financial targets in the unit AIP are
medium; achieved
5.4. Assisted in conducting
of conference with EFFICIENCY
school administrators 5 – 5 systems are established to
and school heads ; esp implement, monitor and evaluate the
. from the applicant PAPs
4 – 4 systems are established to
schools for the implement, monitor and evaluate the
Updating of SM ME PAPs
3 – 3 systems are established to
Policies and implement, monitor and evaluate the
Regulations; PAPs ;
2 – 2 systems are established to
5.5. Assisted in implement, monitor and evaluate the
Capacitating building of PAPs ;
1 – 1 system is established to
SMME field implement, monitor and evaluate the unit
counterparts; PAPs ;

5.6. Provided TA feedbacks

based on the actual TIMELINESS

ocular inspection 5 – Communicated the results/data at

Designated as: least before scheduled deadline
4- Communicated the results
within on scheduled deadline
1. Member of the 3 – Communicated the results/data on
Infrastructure Schedule or deadline
2 – Communicated data after scheduled
Inspectorate team; deadline
2. TWG Establishment of 1 – Never at all
the SDO II of 5%
Zamboanga del No
Jan – Dec
2023
Other Related
Functions
Page

9 5– 100% (Outstanding: Role Model)

Performance represents an extraordinary
level of achievement in terms of quality and
time, technical skills and knowledge,
ingenuity, creativity, and initiative. Employees
at this performance level have demonstrated
exceptional job.
4– 85%-99% (Very Satisfactory:Consistently
Demonstrate)
3- 70%-84% (Satisfactory: Most of the Time
Demonstrates)
100% 2-55%-69% (Unsatisfactory: Sometimes
Demonstrates)
1-54% and below (Poor:Rarely
Demonstrates) Performance was not
TOTAL consistently below expectations and/or
reasonable progress toward critical goals was
not made. Significant improvement is needed
in one or more important areas.
 To get the score, the rating is multiplied by the weight assigned

Rater: Ratee: Approving Authority:

WILSON H. INDING JED A. NIEVES JOY E. LETRAN - SINGSON

Senior Education Program Specialist, SMM & E Education Program Specialist II, SMM & E Chief Education Supervisor, SGOD