OFFICE PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (OPCRF)

NAME OF
EMPLOYEE: ALITA C. RODRIGUEZ NAME OF RATER: ANTONIO P. FAUSTINO JR.
POSITION:
OFFICE/ TEACHER IN-CHARGE POSITION: OIC-ASSISTANT SCHOOLS DIVISION SUPERINTENDENT
DIVISION: SDO-TAYABAS CITY DATE OF REVIEW: AUGUST 2024
TO BE FILLED DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
MFO KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE WEIGHT ACTUAL RESULTS
QUALITY EFFICIENCY TIMELINESS

To ensure effective
management and
implementation of curriculum
in the school in compliance to
quality standards
3. Focusing on
Teaching and
Main MOV: Instructional
Learning Supervisory plan and report
2023 - July
Strand 3.2 Supporting MOVs
Teaching 1. Teachers quadrant
standards and 2. Teachers profile
pedagogies 3. COT rating
4. Observation notes
5. Performance monitoring
and coaching tool
Outstanding Ensured 91-100% of schools
(5) implement and followed
quality teaching and learning
standards Managed and implemented
each one of the approved AIP
performance targets of
Submitted the Curriculum M7E
Curriculum support, programs,
Analysis report within the
projects, activities, and
scheduled date
localized curricula with
consolidated M&E analysis for
FY 2023
Very Satisfactory Ensured 81-90% of schools
(4) implement and followed
quality teaching and learning
standards Was not able to managed and
implemented 1-2 of the
approved AIP performance
Submitted the Curriculum M7E
targets of Curriculum support,
Analysis report with 1-2 days
programs, projects, activities,
late
and localized curricula with
consolidated M&E analysis for
FY 2023
Satisfactory Ensured 71-80% of schools
(3) implement and followed
quality teaching and learning
standards Was not able to managed and
implemented 3-5 of the
August approved AIP performance
10% Submitted the Curriculum M7E
targets of Curriculum support,
2024 programs, projects, activities,
Analysis report with 3-5 days
and localized curricula with
late
consolidated M&E analysis for
FY 2023
Unsatisfactory Ensured 61-70% of schools
(2) implement and followed
quality teaching and learning
standards Was not able to managed and
implemented 6-7 of the
approved AIP performance
Submitted the Curriculum M7E
targets of Curriculum support,
Analysis report with 6-7 days
programs, projects, activities,
late
and localized curricula with
consolidated M&E analysis for
FY 2023
Poor Ensured 51-60% of schools
(1) implement and followed
quality teaching and learning
standards Was not able to managed and
implemented 8-10 of the
approved AIP performance
Submitted the Curriculum M7E
targets of Curriculum support,
Analysis report with 8-10 days
programs, projects, activities,
late
and localized curricula with
consolidated M&E analysis for
FY 2023
 Outstanding Managed the implementation,
(5) development and evaluation
of at least 96% of
contextualized learning
resources compliant to BLR
standards
learning resources in schools
Developed, quality assured,
Submitted the report on the
accessed, and utilized 91-
developed and utilized
100% of the contextualized
learning resources at least 3
days before the set deadline
and learning centers

Very Satisfactory Managed the implementation,

(4) development and evaluation
of at least 90% of
contextualized learning
resources compliant to BLR
standards
Developed, quality assured,
Submitted the report on the
accessed, and utilized 81-90%
developed and utilized
of the contextualized learning
learning resources on the set
resources in schools and
deadline
learning centers

To manage the
implementation of policies,
guidelines, and standards, in Satisfactory Managed the implementation,
3. Focusing on the development and/or (3) development and evaluation
Teaching and contextualization of learning of at least 86% of
Learning contextualized learning Developed, quality assured,
Main MOV: Performance resources compliant to BLR Submitted the report on the
Strand 3.4 Indicator August standards
accessed, and utilized 71-80%
developed and utilized
2023 - July 10% of the contextualized learning
Learning learning resources, 2 days late
2024 resources in schools and
achievment and Supporting MOVs on the set deadline
learning centers
other 1. Intervention programs
performance 2. Project proposal
indicator 3. Research
4. Action plan Unsatisfactory Managed the implementation,
5. Narrative and (2) development and evaluation
accomplishment report of at least 80% of
contextualized learning
resources compliant to BLR Developed, quality assured,
Submitted the report on the
standards accessed, and utilized 61-70%
developed and utilized
of the contextualized learning
learning resources, 5 days late
resources in schools and
on the set deadline
learning centers

Poor Managed the implementation,

(1) development and evaluation
of at least 76% of
contextualized learning
resources compliant to BLR Developed, quality assured,
Submitted the report on the
standards accessed, and utilized 51-60%
developed and utilized
of the contextualized learning
learning resources, 7 days late
resources in schools and
on the set deadline
learning centers
 Outstanding Ensured the results of learning
(5) outcomes assessment by at
least 10% higher than the
BEDP target for 2023

Consolidated and submitted

Submitted the learning
quarterly reports on learning
outcomes assessment report
outcomes in all (100%)
within the scheduled date
learning areas in all schools

Very Satisfactory Ensured the results of learning

(4) outcomes assessment by at
least 7% higher than the BEDP
target for 2024

To ensure effective
Consolidated and submitted Submitted the learning
management and/or quarterly reports on learning outcomes assessment report
implementation of learning outcomes in all (90%) learning with 1-2 days late on the
assessments in schools and areas in all schools scheduled date
learning centers for better
learning outcomes

Main MOVs: Consolidated

reports on classification of
Learner's Grading per Learning
area in every grade level Satisfactory Ensured the results of learning
(3) outcomes assessment by at
Supporting MOVs least 5% higher than the BEDP
1Report on Technical target for 2025
3. Focusing on assistance plan and
Teaching and accomplishment report on
Learning learning intervention with August Consolidated and submitted Submitted the learning
quarterly reports on learning outcomes assessment report
report of pupils increased MPS 2023 - July 10% outcomes in all (85%) learning with 3-5 days late on the
Strand 3. 5 as well as increased of 2024 areas in all schools scheduled date
Learning teacher's efficiency
Assessment 2. Instructional supervisory
plan and accomplishment
report coupled with increase
teacher's efficiency as shown
to their increase in
performance rating
3. Remediation reports with
accomplishment of increased
MPS coupled with increased
liteacy and numeracy skills of
pupils
4. INSET/LAC session reports
on consolidated reports of
Teachers Individual
Development Plan
 teacher's efficiency as shown
to their increase in
performance rating
3. Remediation reports with
accomplishment of increased
MPS coupled with increased
liteacy and numeracy skills of
pupils
4. INSET/LAC session reports
on consolidated reports of
Teachers Individual
Development Plan
Unsatisfactory Ensured the results of learning
(2) outcomes assessment by at
least 3% higher than the BEDP
target for 2026
Consolidated and submitted Submitted the learning
quarterly reports on learning outcomes assessment report
outcomes in all (80%) learning with 6-7 days late on the
areas in all schools scheduled date

Poor Ensured the results of learning

(1) outcomes assessment by at
least 1% higher than the BEDP
target for 2027

Consolidated and submitted Submitted the learning

quarterly reports on learning outcomes assessment report
outcomes in all (75%) learning with8-10 days late on the
areas in all schools scheduled date

* To get the score, the rating is multiplied by the weight assigned

Adjectival Rating Scale

Outstanding 4.500- 5.000

Very Satisfactory 3.500-4.499 ANTONIO P. FAUSTINO JR. CELEDONIO B. BALDERAS J
Satisfactory 2.500-3.499 SCHOOL HEAD OIC-ASSISTANT SCHOOLS DIVISION SUPERINTENDENT SCHOOLS DIVISION SUPERINTE
Unsatisfactory 1.500-2.499 RATEE RATER APPROVING AUTHORITY
Poor 1.000-1.499
MITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (OPCRF)

C-ASSISTANT SCHOOLS DIVISION SUPERINTENDENT

TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION

RATING
SCORE
Q E T AVE
 OVERALL RATING FOR 0.0000
ACCOMPLISHMENT

CELEDONIO B. BALDERAS JR.

SCHOOLS DIVISION SUPERINTENDENT
APPROVING AUTHORITY