Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Department of Education
REGION III
SCHOOLS DIVISION OF PAMPANGA
Weight per
OBJECTIVES TIMELINE PERFORMANCE INDICATORS (Quality, Efficiency
KRA
KRAs MAJOR OUTPUT(s)
(Please indicate the
Shall have . . . 30% Quality
target date.)
LEADING STRATEGICALLY 1. AIP Led in the development of October 2020-July 2021 4% 5- 100% of the school
school strategic and strategic and operational
2. WFP operational plans (SIP, AIP, plans were developed
SMEPA, WFP, DRRM Plan)
3. DRRM Contingency
Plan 4- 80% of the school
strategic and operational
plans were developed
1. School Report Card Led in the implementation October 2020-July 2021 4% 5- 100% of the PPAs in
of school strategic and the developed plans were
2. Accomplishment operational plans anchored implemented
Report on evidence-based
planning
1. School Quarterly Ensured the development October 2020-July 2021 4% 5- 100% of the developed
Adjustment/ of adjustment/catch-up Adjustment/Catch-up
plan based on the plan was implemented
2. Catch-up Plan evaluation of teachers and
other school personnel’s
3. SMEPA performance on a quarterly 4- 80% of the developed
basis Adjustment/Catch-up
plan was implemented
1. SBM Level of Practice Led the school in ensuring October 2020-July 2021 4% 5 – Improved to a higher
of the school compliance to standards of level of SBM Level of
SBM Level of Practice practice
4- 4 principles improved
3- 3 principles improved
2- 2 principles improved
1- 1 principle improved
1. School DRRM Plan Implemented the School October 2020-July 2021 4% 5- 100% of the PPAs in
DRRM Plan the School DRRM Plan
2. School DRRM were implemented
Accomplishment Report
4- 80% of the PPAs in
the School DRRM Plan
were implemented
3- 60% of the PPAs in
the School DRRM Plan
were implemented
2- 40% of the PPAs in
the School DRRM Plan
were implemented
1- 20% of the PPAs in
the School DRRM Plan
were implemented
1. Innovative School Implemented innovative October 2020-July 2021 4% 5 – At least 3 innovative
Practices and practices/researches in practices created and
Researches school operations deployed/researches
implemented
4 – At least 2 innovative
practices created and
deployed/researches
implemented
3 – At least 1 innovative
practices created and
deployed/researches
implemented
2 – At least 3 innovative
practices created/
researches
conceptualized
1 – At least 2 innovative
practices created/
researches
conceptualized
4- 90-94% of the
operationalization of the
Management Information
Systems (MIS) were
updated
3- 85-89% of the
operationalization of the
Management Information
Systems (MIS) were
updated
2- 80-84% of the
operationalization of the
Management Information
Systems (MIS) were
updated
1- 75-79% of the
operationalization of the
Management Information
Systems (MIS) were
updated
Shall have . . .
Weight per PERFORMANCE INDICATORS (Quality, Efficiency
KRA MAJOR OUTPUTS TIMELINE
KRA
OBJECTIVES Quality
MANAGING SCHOOL 1. School MOOE Improved disbursement October 2020-July 2021 4% 5 – 100% disbursement
OPERATIONS AND Utilization and and liquidation rate of and liquidation rate of
RESOURCES Liquidation Report school funds school funds
4 – 99% disbursement
and liquidation rate of
school funds
3 – 98% disbursement
and liquidation rate of
school funds
2 – 97% disbursement
and liquidation rate of
school funds
1 – 96% disbursement
and liquidation rate of
school funds
1. BFARS, Financial Led in the preparation and October 2020-July 2021 4% 5 - 100% of the Financial
Statements (monthly, submission of Financial reportorial requirements
quarterly, semi-annual, reportorial requirements of the school were
annual) submitted
4 - 99% of the Financial
reportorial requirements
of the school were
submitted
3 - 98% of the Financial
reportorial requirements
of the school were
submitted
2 - 97% of the Financial
reportorial requirements
of the school were
submitted
1 - 96% of the Financial
reportorial requirements
of the school were
submitted
1. SEF Annual Budget, Led the school October 2020-July 2021 4% 5- 100% of the SEF
quarterly SEF management with allocation of the school
Utilization report economical, efficient, and were utilized
effective utilization of
school appropriations and
4- 99% of the SEF
disbursements sourced
allocation of the school
from SEF
were utilized
3- 98% of the SEF
allocation of the school
were utilized
2- 97% of the SEF
allocation of the school
were utilized
1- 96% of the SEF
allocation of the school
were utilized
1. E-systems for Improved the efficiency on October 2020-July 2021 4% 5- 3 e-systems created
governance the management of school and deployed
data using technology (HR,
Finance, Admin, Supply
Inventory, Learner 4- 3 e-systems created
Enrolment, Learner
Support, etc.)
3- 2 e-systems created
and deployed
2- 2 e-systems created
1- 1 e-systems created
and deployed
1. PPEI Report Updated the Property Plant October 2020-July 2021 4% 5- 100% completion of
and Equipment Inventory report on PPEI
(PPEI) in the school
4- 99% completion of
report on PPEI
3- 98% completion of
report on PPEI
2- 97% completion of
report on PPEI
1- 96% completion of
report on PPEI
Shall have . . . Weight per PERFORMANCE INDICATORS (Quality, Efficiency
KRA MAJOR OUTPUTS TIMELINE
OBJECTIVES KRA Quality
FOCUSING ON TEACHING 1. School Basic Led in the preparation of October 2020-July 2021 4% 5- 100% of the PPAs in
AND LEARNING Education Learning School BE-LCP and in the School BE-LCP were
Continuity Plan (BE- managing programs for implemented
LCP) curriculum
implementation,
2. Accomplishment localization of curricula,
Report and learning delivery 4- 90% of the PPAs in
the School BE-LCP were
implemented
3- 80% of the PPAs in
the School BE-LCP were
implemented
2- 70% of the PPAs in
the School BE-LCP were
implemented
1- 60% of the PPAs in
the School BE-LCP were
implemented
1. Developed Led and managed the October 2020-July 2021 4% 5- 100% of the target
contextualized Learning development of local local curriculum
materials curriculum materials on materials were developed
critical content
4- 90% of the target local
curriculum materials
were developed
2. Contextualized Led in the development of October 2020-July 2021 4% 5- 100% of the target
learning assessment contextualized assessment contextualized learning
tools tools to measure learners' assessment tools were
achievement developed
4- 90% of the target
contextualized learning
assessment tools were
developed
3- 80% of the target
contextualized learning
assessment tools were
developed
2- 100% of the target
contextualized learning
assessment tools were
developed
1- 60% of the target
contextualized learning
assessment tools were
developed
Shall have . . . Weight per PERFORMANCE INDICATORS (Quality, Efficiency
TIMELINE
KRA MAJOR OUTPUTS OBJECTIVES KRA Quality
DEVELOPING SELF AND 1. School HRMD Plan Implemented the School October 2020-July 2021 4% 5 - 100% of the PPAs
OTHERS and accomplishment HRMD Plan under HRMD Plan were
implemented
4 - 90% of the PPAs
under HRMD Plan were
implemented
3 - 80% of the PPAs
under HRMD Plan were
implemented
2 - 70% of the PPAs
under HRMD Plan were
implemented
1 - 60% of the PPAs
under HRMD Plan were
implemented
1. Membership to Participated and organized October 2020-July 2021 4% 5- 100% of the target
professional networks professional networks for professional network
by teachers and school colleagues organized/participated in
personnel by teachers and school
personnel
1. Evaluated IPCRF of Evaluated the performance October 2020-July 2021 4% 5- 100% of the school
school personnel of teachers and non- personnel were evaluated
teaching staff based on the and provided with
RPMS development plan
Competent School Implemented professional October 2020-July 2021 4% 5 – 100% of the school
Personnel learning and development personnel were provided
initiatives for school with L&D opportunity
personnel
1. List of recognized Recognized outstanding October 2020-July 2021 4% 5- 100% of the school
school personnel performance of teaching personnel were
and non-teaching recognized at the end of
personnel by the end of the the rating period
rating period
________________________ _________________________________________