The document discusses the border disputes between India and China along three sectors - Western, Central, and Eastern. It analyzes the reasons for increased tensions, including China's opposition to India building roads and changing domestic laws regarding Kashmir and Ladakh. The document also examines China's "debt-trap diplomacy" with other countries and how India responded by banning Chinese apps. It argues that India needs to take a strong stance against China to restore the border status quo and protect its cyber sovereignty.
The document discusses the border disputes between India and China along three sectors - Western, Central, and Eastern. It analyzes the reasons for increased tensions, including China's opposition to India building roads and changing domestic laws regarding Kashmir and Ladakh. The document also examines China's "debt-trap diplomacy" with other countries and how India responded by banning Chinese apps. It argues that India needs to take a strong stance against China to restore the border status quo and protect its cyber sovereignty.
The document discusses the border disputes between India and China along three sectors - Western, Central, and Eastern. It analyzes the reasons for increased tensions, including China's opposition to India building roads and changing domestic laws regarding Kashmir and Ladakh. The document also examines China's "debt-trap diplomacy" with other countries and how India responded by banning Chinese apps. It argues that India needs to take a strong stance against China to restore the border status quo and protect its cyber sovereignty.
The Indo-China border disputes exist among the three sectors. Starting from the Western Sector which remains disputed as it consists of the Aksai Chin. It is administered by China after India lost this area to China after the Sino-Indian War in 1962. Aksai Chin has been of strategic importance for China as it connects Tibet and Xinjiang. China has also exercised claims on Tibet now and then. The Strategy of China can be interpreted as acquiring regions that share a border with Tibet will give support to such claims. India still exercises claims over the entire Aksai Chin Valley as well as the Shaksgam Valley and on the other hand, China opposes India’s Control over Daulat Beg Oldi which is an ancient trade route connecting Ladakh to the Tarim Basin. Coming to the Central Sector which remains Undisputed to some extend but the Doklam Standoff shows a different side of the story. Moving to the Eastern Sector which also remains Disputed as China claims to land around 90000 sq.km near the Arunachal Pradesh border which makes it the largest disputed area. Tension has been constant in this region as China's claims have been skyrocketing day by day over regions in the Indian Territory. Reasons behind the Galwan Valley Stand-off Fresh tensions among India and China activated after the decision of construction of 32 roads along the Indo-China border got the official stamp by the Government of India. China was against such a move as the construction of solid structures like roads will result in increased movement by Indian Military troops which would make it difficult for infiltration impossible. Abrogation of Article 370 gave Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh the status of Union Territories by the Government of India. China condemned this move and took the matter in United Nations Security Council as China believed India’s inclusion of Ladakh by changing the domestic law has undermined China’s sovereignty. India made its stance clear by mentioning the this is their internal matter. China constructed an observation post on the Indian side of LAC to monitor the troop movement which made it easier for the Chinese People’s Liberation Army to enter inside the Indian Territory. China has been continuously facing criticism at the international level on various issues be it the origination of the Coronavirus or the Hongkong National Security Act passed by China. Even the US-China trade-off has negatively impacted China's growth. Last but not the least, India's new FDI rules which discourage takeovers of Indian Companies have badly hit China. All the above-mentioned incidents have triggered this face-off between the two countries. Decoding China's debt-trap diplomacy China’s top trading partners in terms of exports have been United States, Hongkong, Japan, South Korea, South Korea, Vietnam, Germany, India, Netherlands, United Kingdom, Taiwan, Singapore, Malaysia, Russia, Australia, Mexico. China's game plan has always been flooding the local markets of every country with its products and not importing the same quantity of goods from that very country results in an increased trade deficit. This is how Countries fall as a prey into this debt trap. After this, China starts manipulating and interfering in the internal matters of that country (especially small countries that do not possess proper border security forces e.g. Vietnam) Countries with Strong Military Forces like India, the United States can stand in front of China and make eye contact and say ''don't mess with us''. The step taken by India regarding banning 59 Chinese Apps has shown the world how a nation should protect its Cyberspace sovereignty from external interferences. Even though it a small step taken by the Indian Government, but this has helped India gather votes at the International Level. Way Forward India's priority should be to restore the status quo ante at the border to ease down tensions that have prevailed since April 2020. India should continue all its road construction projects near all the Indo-China borders. It's high time that China starts taking India seriously. India needs to respond to china's aggression and stop having a big-brother attitude towards China. As far as the 5G network rollout is concerned India shows ban Huawei and Nokia and Ericsson should be given the lead in the race of 5G rollout in India. If India fails to do so due to any reason, then banning those 59 apps would lose its Cyberspace sovereignty to China, and Data leaks won't be of any surprise then. The government of India needs a strategic plan to execute all such moves then only the pill will be too hard to swallow for China. Even though this move may hamper the “diplomatic relations” of India and China, India should be ready for the same as maintaining “diplomatic relations” at the cost of national sovereignty is a too high price to pay. WORD COUNT- 808