Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Abstract
time on electrodeposition of nickel, by varying the pulse electrodeposits prepared under well-defined pulse
frequency at constant duty cycle and peak current parameters and (2) to produce ultra-fine-grained nickel
density. However, by varying the pulse frequency in electrodeposits from organic-free Watts bath.
this manner, both the on-time and off-time change
simultaneously and hence it is difKcult to ascertain the
influence of on-time or off-time separately. 2. Experimental procedure
Similarly, the effect of peak current density on the
crystal size of the deposit is commonly investigated in A conventional Watts-type solution, as shown in
two ways [ 121: one way is to increase JP at a constant Table 1, in a standard 2-l reaction kettle was used to
on-time and constant average current density, J, , where produce approximately 300~urn thick nickel electro-
J,=J, . y, as represented in Fig. 1. This method has deposits. Analytical grade chemicals and distilled water
the disadvantage that the off-time cannot be kept con- were used to prepare the solutions. The bath temperature
stant, and hence the observed effect on the microstruc- was maintained at 60 5 O.lo”C and its pH was adjusted
ture of the deposit could be due to increased off-time to 4.5 by adding nickel carbonate.
and/or higher JP [ 121. One can also increase Jr, at a A high purity (99.99%) electrolytic nickel sheet con-
constant pulse charge (i.e., the number of coulombs per tained in a titanium mesh basket was used as the soluble
pulse is kept constant) and at a constant average current anode. Its surface area was approximately 10 times
density, J, ClZ]. Although the Z’& is then only very greater than that of the cathode to ensure that there
slightly changed, To, changes considerably, as can be were no problems arising from anode polarization, par-
seen in Fig. 2, and hence it becomes difficult to ascertain ticularly at high current densities [13]. The cathode
the effect of J, on the microstructure. substrate was made of titanium sheet with an exposed
The aim of this paper is two fold: (1) to investigate surface area of 1 or 2 cm2, which was ground on 600
the structural and morphological modifications of nickel grit SiC paper. The anode was placed at a distance of
6 cm from the cathode. The nickel electrodeposits were
electroplated onto the Ti cathode and subsequently
mechanically stripped for microstructural char-
? . TO, :: Toff * acterization.
JP Electrodeposition was carried out galvanostatically
------------ -_ ___ 1 _
nr using square-wave pulsed current with current cut-off
:_ ’ tJm during the interval between the pulses. The plating
0 t
parameters were varied within a range which has pre-
w_) Ton
_‘ +&yg?, JP
TOE l -
roughness of the deposit.
The pulse parameters were selected such that in all
cases the pulse on-time was less than the transition time,
I- I’----- ;+pg 41 ---------A-- z (the time required for the interfacial concentration to
reach zero [15J) and much longer than the charging
tJm
0 t
Table 1
Bath composition and plating conditions for Ni deposition from
Watts-type baths
Table 2
Range of pulse-plating parameters investigated in this study
T,, W T,ff bs) Current density, (mA cm-‘) Duty cycle (%) Plating time (min)
JP Jl?i
1 15 400 2.5 6 194
3 15 400 68 17 71
5 15 400 100 25 48
8 15 400 140 35 35
1 5 400 68 17 71
1 15 400 25 6 194
1 22 400 17 4 215
1 32 400 12 3 403
1 42 400 9 2 537
1 15 400 25 6 194
1 15 800 75 6 64
1 15 1600 100 6 48
time, t, in microseconds, of the double layer as calculated are not due to the influence of mass transport phen-
from Eq. (1) and Eq. (2), respectively [ 16,151. omena [ 121.
Macrographs of all nickel electrodeposits were taken
z = {~D(C,)Z(ZF)2)/4(5,)2 (1) using a 35-mm camera equipped with a macrolens
t, = 17/J, (2) attachment. Scanning electron microscopy was used for
the observation of the surface morphology of the
where J, is the peak current density (A/cm2), z is the
as-plated surface of the electrodeposits. SEM micro-
number of electrons (2, for the case of nickel), F is
graphs were taken normal to the as-plated surface at
Faraday’s number (96,500 coulombs), C, is the bulk
magnifications up to 10 000 x . For fine-grained electro-
concentration of Ni2” ions (mol/L) and D is the diffusion deposits dark-field transmission electron micrographs
coefficient of Ni2+ (cm2/sec). In addition, the pulse off- were taken for the examination of the structure. Thin
time was selected such that the shortest pulse off-time
foils for transmission electron microscopy (TEM) exami-
was several orders of magnitude longer than the dis-
nation were prepared by electropolishing using an
charge time, td, of the double layer as calculated from
electrolyte comprising 6% perchloric acid, 15% methanol
equation (3) I: 161.
and 79% acetic acid at a temperature of -10°C and a
td = 120/J, (3) voltage of 15 V d.c. The grain size of these electrodeposits
was determined directly from dark field transmission
where td and Jp are as defined above in @s) and
electron micrographs by measuring approximately 250
(A mm2), respectively.
grains. X-ray diffraction patterns were obtained using
In calculating z, a bulk concentration (C,= Cu-Ka radiation (A= 1.54184 A) on a standard 8-20
1.26 mall-I) of nickel ions as calculated from the
diffractometer.
total Ni content given in Table 1 was used. In addition,
for the diffusion coefficient of nickel ions in solution the
value of D=0.76 x 10m5 cm2 s-i was used [ 171. The
limitation pertaining to the transition time is important 3. Results and discussion
so that the depletion of Ni2+ cations in the pulsating
diffusion layer at the end of the pulse is small [ 121.
The range of current densities shown in Table 2 was 3.1. Effect of on-time
selected such that the highest average value (140
mA cm-“) was well below the limiting current density Table 3 illustrates the pulse-plating parameters and
for the bath used in the present work. Although a average current densities, J,, used to investigate the
measurement of the limiting current density was not effect of pulse on-time on crystal size, surface morphol-
conducted in the present study, it is safe to assume that ogy and crystal orientation of these deposits. Fig. 3
its value is higher than 240 mA crnm2 as previously shows the surface morphologies and the macrographs
measured for d.c. plating using a Watts’ bath with similar (insets) of the nickel deposits obtained at pulse on-times
composition and operated at 52°C and a pH of 4 [ 171. of 1, 3, 5 and 8 ms. The pulse off-time and the peak
The limitation on the average current density is impor- current density were kept constant at 15 ms and 400
tant so that the depletion in the stationary diffusion mA cmm2, respectively (see Table 3). It is obvious from
layer is small and the microstructural changes, therefore, the optical insets that at the shortest on-time (Fig. 3a)
A.M. El-Sherik et al./Swface and Coatings Technology 88 (1996) 70-78 73
111)(200)
Fig. 4a. For comparison purposes, an X-ray diffraction
(220) (311)(222)
pattern for a standard Ni powder showing peak inten-
sities for a random grain distribution is also represented
in Fig. 4b. It is clear from Fig. 4a that longer pulse
on-times lead to a progressive change in the crystal
orientation from an almost random texture to a strong
(200) fibre texture. The observed transition in crystal
orientation may be attributed to the effect of increased
8msec
pulse on-times on: (1) the depletion of cations at the
cathode film; (2) the overpotential; (3) the thickness
of the pulsating diffusion layer; (4) hydrogen
adsorption/evolution; and (5) other adsorption pro-
b 1 1 . 5msec cesses. However, it is difficult to assess how these
variables separately or in combination could have caused
the observed transition in crystal orientation.
(4 2 THETA (DEG.)
60 80 100
Table S
Plating parameters used to investigate the influence of peak current 111)(200) (220) (311)(222)
density
JP J,
1 A n R - ‘42msec
1 15 400 25
1 15 800 75
1 15 1600 100
J # a :42mec
d _ h _ 3211x.x
‘)I L I\ -22msec
Fig. 9. Influence of J, on surface morphology of 300~pm thick nickel
deposits with constant &r of 15 ms and T,, of 1 ms: (a)
J,=400mAcm-2; (b) J,=800mAcm-2; and (c) JP=1600mAcm-2.
-i l Ton : 1 0 .
It is clear that further reduction in grain size was
obtained with increasing on-time. The increased refine-
ment in grain size further supports the argument that
Fig. 10. Further refinement in grain structure obtained at a peak current density of (a) 1600 mA cm-’ but with (b) T,,=3 ms and (c) To,=5 ms.
40 60 80 100
2 THETA (DEG.)
Fig. 11. XRD patterns showing the influence of Jr on the crystal orien-
tation of nickel deposits with constant T,e of 15 ms and T,, of 1 ms.
tions used to produce these extremely fine-grained The authors acknowledge financial support from the
deposits. X-ray diffraction pattern studies on these Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of
samples were not possible due to the curling of these Canada, Energy, Mines and Resources of Canada and
deposits. the School of Graduate Studies at Queen’s University.
3.4. Production of nanocrystals by pulseplating
References
It may be inferred from electrocrystallization theory
that high negative overpotential, high adion population [l] C. Kollia and N. Spyrellis, Su$ Coat. Technol., 57 (1993) 71.
and low adion surface mobility are prerequisites for [Z] J. Amblard, M. Froment, G. Maurin, N. Spyrellis and E. Trevisan-
massive nucleation rates and reduced grain growth [22]; Souteyr, Electrochim. A&a, 28 (1983) 909.
conditions ideal for nanograin production. Pulse plating [3] B.C. Banejee and A. Goswami, J. Electrochetn. Sot., 106 (1959)
can satisfy the former two requirements but calculations
[4] ?C!. Banerjee and A. Goswami, J. Sci. Indust. Res., 14B (1955)
by Conway and Bockris [23] showed that surface 322.
mobility is not rate-limiting under high overpotentials [S] C. Kollia, N. Spyrellis, J. Amblard, M. Froment and G. Maurin,
for nickel. Inhibitors are required to reduce surface J. Appl. Electrochem, 20 (1990) 1025.
diffusion of adions on the cathode surface in order to [6] E. Valles, R. Pollina and E. Gomez, J. Appl. Electrochem., 23
produce nanograins in the order of 10nm. This is (1993) 508.
[7] C.J. Chen and CC. Wan, J. Electrocltem. SOL, 136 (1989) 2850.
consistent with our previous work [ 141 where we have [8] A.M. El-Sherik and U. Erb, Production ofNanocrystaIline Metals,
reported the production of nanocrystalline nickel with US patent No. 5,352,266 (1994).
grain sizes in the order of 10 nm from saccharin-contain- [9] H. Gleiter, Progr. Mater. Sci., 33 (1989) 223.
ing Watts’ baths. In this case, saccharin acted as an [lo] Tai-Ping Sun, CC. Wan and Y.M. Shy, Metual Finish., 77 (1979)
inhibitor limiting the surface mobility of adions on the
[ 111 G: Kim and R. Weil, Suti Coat. Technol., 38 (1989) 289.
cathode surface resulting in nanosized grains. In contrast, [ 121 J.CI. Puippe and N. Ibl, Plating Surf. Finishing, 68 (1980) 68.
the present results have shown that when using an [ 131 N.V. Parthasaradhy, Practical Electroplating Handbook, Prentice
organic-free Watts’ bath and similar pulse-plating condi- Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, (1989).
tions, the grain size can only be refined down to about [ 141 A.M. El-Sherik and U. Erb, J. Mater. Sci., 30 (1995) 5743.
100 nm. [ 151 N. Ible, XI. Puippe and H. Angerer, SurJ Techno!., 6 (1978) 287.
[16] Puippe, JCL, in Theory and Practice of Pulse Plating, AESFS,
1986.
[ 171 A.H. DuRose, Plating Surf.Finishing, 64 (1977) 48.
4. Conclusions [18] K. Hosokawa, H. Angerer, JCL Puippe and N. Ibl, Plating Sutf.
Finishing, 68 (1980) 52.
Ultra-fine-grained nickel electrodeposits with grain [l9] VS. Abdulin and V.I. Chernenko, Plot. Metals, 18 (1982) 777.
[20] H. Fischer, Electrodeposition SW& Treatment, I (1973) 319.
size down to about 100 nm were produced from an [21] S. Yoshimura, S. Chida, E. Sato and N. Kubota, Metal Finishing,
organic-free Watts’ bath using pulse plating. Increasing 84 (1986) 39.
pulse on-time in the range l-5 ms resulted in grain [22] R.T.C. Choo, J.M. Toguri, A.M. El-Sherik and U. Erb, J. Appl.
refinement which is attributed to increased overpotential. Electiochem., 25 (1995) 384.
The crystal orientation progressively changed from an [23] B.E. Conway and J.O’M. Bockris, Electrochitn. Acta, 3 (1961) 340.