Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Encore
At a Glance
Since 1958, Pakistan has seen the rule of four military leaders
W
ill the coups against elected governments continue to derail democracy
in Pakistan? This is a question on many people’s mind because: 1)
Pakistan has seen several military coups during its young history; 2) military
is the most powerful and disciplined service (wrongly described sometimes as
an ‘institution’) perceived by many as the lone saviour of the country; 3) every
other government uses the possibility of a coup as a scare tactic even when
the real threat to their rule is on account of feeble governance, corruption and
mismanagement; 4) tension between the elected governments and the military
top brass on issues ranging from foreign policy to economic management and
from appointment/ extension in service of heads of the army or the Inter-
Services Intelligence (ISI) make headlines; and 5) the people are not in
agreement with regard to the kind of political system they would like to live
under. Tracing the history and the causes of military takeovers in the country
is necessary to answer the question.
Why did all these coups happen in Pakistan? To begin with, a combination of
hostile neighbours (mainly India) and threats to internal security are among
the major determinants of the national security. It has been claimed for long
that Pakistan got its freedom from India. This is factually incorrect — both
India and Pakistan got their independence from the British colonisers in
August 1947.
The threat from India, a hostile neighbor, is thus exaggerated. The truth is that
Pakistan lost its eastern wind, in 1971, in one of the four wars (1948, 1965, 1971
and 1999) it has fought against India. Besides, several terrorist groups,
insurgents, separatists and extremists (some of them allegedly supported by
foreign powers) pose a serious challenge to the national integration.
Secondly, the absence of an efficient administrative fabric leaves the
underprivileged and unprivileged, even sometimes the privileged citizens, at
the mercy of nefarious elements. Unfortunately, there is a vast administrative
vacuum. Disasters, both natural and man-made, expose the inadequacies in
our civilian setup quite frequently. This makes people dependent on the good
work done by the military in times of emergencies like floods, earthquakes,
fires and pandemics. This provides an opportunity to the military to build its
image and to create authority that is deemed necessary to rule a developing
country. This creates the impression that military is the lone messiah. When
some adventurous generals overthrow a civilian government people
remember and acknowledge their services and welcome them.
The demise of Quaid-i-Azam (1948) and the murder of Liaquat Ali Khan (1951)
created a leadership crisis on one hand and triggered an endless power tussle
among the politicians on the other. Their lack of capacity and maturity ceded
space first to the bureaucracy and then the military.
The writer has a PhD in history from Shanghai University and is a lecturer at
GCU, Faisalabad. He can be contacted at mazharabbasgondal87@gmail.com. He
tweets at @MazharGondal87
Share this article:
Advertisement
Most Popular
Birth of a nation
By Husain Naqi
New horizons
By Dr Ejaz Hussain
By Ali Raza
Is a turnaround possible?
By Mansoor Ahmad
By Mansoor Ahmad
Advertisement
New horizons
The longest war
A long-awaited verdict
The News International - Copyright @ 2010-2022