Republic of the Philippines

Department of Education
Region VII-Central Visyas
SCHOOLS DIVISION OF BOHOL

WEEKLY LESSON PLAN

(DepEd Order 42, s 2016)

Teachers Name: ________________________ Quarter: _2__

Subject and Grade Level: CREATIVE NONFICTION – 11/12 Week: _4__

Most General Objective:

Essential
Learning Write a mini critique of a peer’s work based on coherence and
Competency organization of paragraphs, development of literary elements use of
- (MELC) factual information, and other qualities concerning form and content

Specific Objectives: At the end the lesson the learners are expected to;
A. Knowledge:

 discuss the guide questions in assessing own critique

paper;

B. Psychomotor:

 write a coherent mini critique of a peer’s works about real

life experience; and

C. Affective:

 Demonstrate appreciation of the significance in evaluating

a literary piece/text.

Content Writing a clear and coherent mini critique of a peer’s work in Creative
Nonfiction
Learning
CREATIVE NONFICTION QUARTER II – MODULE (DEPED- BOHOL)
Resources

Procedures A. Preparation

● Opening Prayer.
● Setting the classroom environment (arranging the chairs, checking if the
classroom is clean and orderly).
● Ensuring a safe learning environment for everyone. Giving of New
Normal classroom rules.
● Checking of attendance and uniform.
● Stating the objectives of the lesson.
● Activating Prior Knowledge:
B. Presentation (Day 1)
1. Drills/Activity:
Directions: Define and explain the following terms.

 Critique
 Content
 Organization
 Style

 Grammar and Mechanics

2. Analysis: Probing Questions/ Guide Questions

1. What are the terms found in the activity?

2. How are the terms useful?
3. What do you mean by critique, content, organization, style,
grammar and mechanics?
4. How to make a critique?
5. Why do you think critique is important in our daily lives?

Note: Ask students about the topic from the given activity.

C. Lesson Proper

Guide Questions One Should Answer in Assessing His Own Critique Paper
Content
1. Is the main idea clear?
2. Is the explanation comprehensive and sufficient?
3. Does the explanation have depth?
4. Are the supporting details directly linked to the main idea?
5. Does the introduction state the title, author, and main idea of the
reviewed essay?
6. Does the paper present the summary of the essay?
7. Does the paper present different perspectives of the raised issues?
8. Does the paper clearly point out the weaknesses of the reviewed essay?
9. Is the explanation or opinion supported by evidence?
10. Does the paper cite specific sources to support claims?
11. Are the ideas convincingly presented?
12.Does the conclusion state the overall impression of the work?

Organization
1. Does the paper use an organizational pattern and structure appropriate
for the genre?
2. Are cohesive devices effectively used?
3. Are the ideas correctly placed which improves the paper’s organization?
4. Is the flow of ideas smooth and easy to read?

Style
1. Does the paper showcase the writer’s voice?
2. Does the paper use a variety of sentence structures?
3. Is the paper free from sexiest language?
4. Does the paper use language appropriate to context?
5. Does the paper eliminate wordy expressions?

Grammar and Mechanics

1. Is grammar accurate?
 2. Are spelling, capitalization, and punctuations correctly used?
3. Is word choice appropriate?
4. Are sentences well structured?

D. Problem (Day 2)
*During the 2nd day of the 4th week, recall the Guide Questions in Assessing Own Critique Paper.
After, distribute mini-critique papers from the previous week and let them evaluate the said paper
using the rubrics found below.

Directions. Attached in this module is a non- fiction writing made by your

classmate in the previous week. On your Reflective Journal, evaluate his/ her
writing using the rubrics below. Also, supply the needed information as essay
title, writer, and topic.

Essay Title: ____________________________________________________

Writer/Author: __________________________________________________
Topic: ___________________________________________________________

Criteria Very Good Good (3) Fair (2) Failing (1) Score
(4)
Content Clear, well- Clear thesis but Thesis is Unclear
(40%) focused supporting info. is somewhat clear thesis,
thesis, general; reasonable but inadequate inadequate
excellent command of subject details; relative command of
command of matter, supporting absence of subject
subject details are independent matter,
matter, well somewhat relevant thought unexamined
organized yet key points are inconsistent thinking
unsupported substantiation,
Organization Clear Clear organization; Significant Hard to
(30%) organization; introduction lapses in follow
introduction contains the thesis; organization; organization;
is inviting; but not particularly introduction is no clear
clear thesis, inviting the reader; not inviting; introduction
details are some details not in details are and
logical; logical order distracting; conclusion;
conclusion is conclusion does poor
strong not fit the development
introduction of ideas

Style (20%) Effective, Tone and language Problematic Incoherent

powerful are somewhat with voice; relation of
tone and effective; ideas are ideas are ideas; no
language connected but there unclear; points thought
use; pacing is a little variety; are repeated behind tone
is well pacing is well- and language
controlled, controlled but lack use;
with variety elaboration of ideas inadequate
of thoughtful transitions,
transitions faulty
structural
makeup;
inadequate
transition
 Grammar Few errors Occasional errors in Frequent errors Dominated
and in spelling, spelling, in spelling, by errors in
Mechanics punctuation, punctuation, punctuation, spelling,
(10%) capitalizatio capitalization, capitalization, punctuation,
n, sentence sentence structure, sentence capitalization
structure, grammar structure, , sentence
grammar grammar structure,
grammar

Rating

E. Generalization (Day 3)
*During the 3rd day of the 4th week, recall the experience of some students as they evaluate the
mini-critiques papers of their classmates. As well as random observations of some mini-critique
papers following the guidelines of Writing Nonfiction Critiques. After, summarize the whole
subject-matter through a fill-in the blank type of test.

Direction: Supply each line with the correct terms in order to make the
statement correct.

A ____(1)_____ is a critical assessment, analysis, or evaluation of a particular

work. It usually ranges from ___(2)___ to ___(3)___ words in length.

____(4)___ do not simply rely on mere opinions; rather, they use both ___(5)___
and ___(6)___ to substantiate their comments.

The most important guideline for a critique is to give an ___(7)___, ___(8)___,

and ___(9)___ assessment of the writing. All ___(10)___ should be about the
words written, not about the person writing them.

In making a critique, one should consider his overall impressions on the

content, style, audience, and format. He should also take note on the
mechanics as structure, and grammar.

A critique should contain these three important parts as introduction, body

and conclusion

KEY ANSWERS

1. critique 6. Logical reasoning

2. 250 7. honest
3. 750 8. constructive
4. Critics 9. polite
5. Proofs 10. comments

F. Evaluation (Day 4)
*During the 4th day or the last day of the 4th week, to check if the students able to understand how
to assess mini-critique paper, give them sets of question and let them identify as to what guide
question it belongs.

Directions. Analyze the following guide questions to which it belongs, whether it is

content, organization, style, and grammar and mechanics.

1. Is the main idea clear?

2. Does the paper use an organizational pattern and structure appropriate
for the genre?
3. Does the paper showcase the writer’s voice?
4. Is word choice appropriate?
5. Are sentences well structured?
6. Does the paper use a variety of sentence structures?
 7. Are cohesive devices effectively used?
8. Is the explanation comprehensive and sufficient?

KEY ANSWERS:

1. Content 5. Grammar and Mechanics

2. Organization 6. Style
3. Style 7. Organization
4. Grammar and Mechanics 8. Content

G. Closing

Directions. Determine how often you practice each statement. Write your
answers on your Reflective Journal and do this section as objectively as
possible.

Usually Sometimes Seldom Never

(3pts) (2pts) (1pt) (0pt)
1. I consider my purpose before
writing a reaction paper, review
or critique.
2. I take the reader into
consideration when writing.
3. I form opinion based on facts
and cite instances in the text or
material to support these
opinions.
4. I use reliable sources to
support my ideas.
5. I evaluate the article or book
using sound explanation.
6. I raise my points objectively
with sufficient information.
7. I point out the ideas that the
author missed, scenes that were
left hanging, or questions which
were unanswered.
8. I state my overall impression
of the work at the end of the
review.
TOTAL

Score Level of Proficiency

24-22 Advanced
21-19 Proficient
18-16 Approaching Proficiency
15-14 Developing Proficiency
12 and below Beginning Proficiency

Note: This will serve as a post evaluation of student regarding the lesson.
Remarks

Reflection
Prepared by:

___________________
Subject Teacher