You are on page 1of 1

History is subjective kasi sa pagstudy po ng history and while searching for

the truth, need po ng subjectivity to connect the dots and

to make one firm conclusion, and the past interpretations of historians

have at least a small part or element of subjectivity that entered

along the process of investigations based po sa nadiscuss niyo last meeting.

Also, not all evidence of history is already present.

Some evidence po are destroyed or not finished.

Yung subjectivity po is unavoidable. Also sabi po kanina,

facts dont speak for themselves po so iyon

but still, kahit subjective siya, people do not reject the

idea of objectivity din po since may research, techniques, or methodology po

na ineemploy. They still use objectivity along the process of investigations.

And historians give up their former beliefs

po kapag may bagong evidence na dumarating to make a new account

that better fits empirical data

You might also like