You are on page 1of 4

HOME LAWS/ RULES/ REGULATIONS FORMS ANNOUNCEMENTS

tiktok

Over a cup of Coffee and a pint of Insanity

HOME

FOLLOWERS Home »
case digest
, GR No. L-30061
, People vs. Jabinal
» Case Digest: Search
People vs. Jabinal
Followers (35)
Next Popular Tags Blog Archives
Case Digest: People vs. Jabinal
Case Digest: MUTUC VS. COMELEC
By LAPADIDAY  March 20, 2016
  No comments
G.R. No. L-32717 November 26, 1970 AMELITO
R. MUTUC vs. COMELEC FACTS: Petitioner
Mutuc was a candidate for delegate to ...
GR No. L-30061 (February 27, 1974)
Case Digest: LACSON VS. EXECUTIVE
People vs. Jabinal SECRETARY
301 SCRA 298; G.R. NO. 12809620 JAN 1999
FACTS: LACSON VS. EXECUTIVE SECRETARY Facts: 
Eleven persons believed to be members of th...
Jabinal was found guilty of the crime of Illegal Possession of Firearm and
Case Digest: Serrano vs. Gallant Maritime
Ammunition. Services, Inc and Marlow Navigation Co.,Inc.
The accused admitted that on September 5, 1964, he was in possession G.R. No. 167614               March 24, 2009
ANTONIO M. SERRANO   vs.  Gallant MARITIME
Follow of the revolver and the ammunition described in the complaint, without the SERVICES, INC...
requisite license or permit. He, however, claimed to be entitled to
exoneration because, although he had no license or permit, he had an
FACEBOOK PAGE LAWPADIDAY.COM
appointment as Secret Agent from the Provincial Governor of Batangas
and an appointment as Confidential Agent from the PC Provincial
Case D… Commander, and the said appointments expressly carried with them the
8.3K likes
authority to possess and carry the firearm in question.

The accused contended before the court a quo that in view of his above-
mentioned appointments as Secret Agent and Confidential Agent, with
Like Page
authority to possess the firearm subject matter of the prosecution, he was
entitled to acquittal on the basis of the Supreme Court’s decision
Powered by Blogger.
in People vs. Macarandang(1959)  and People vs. Lucero(1958) and not
on the basis of the latest reversal and abandonment in People vs. Mapa
ABOUT ME
(1967).

ISSUE:

Whether or not appellant should be acquitted on the basis of the court’s


rulings in Macarandang and Lucero, or should his conviction stand in view
of the complete reversal of the Macarandang and Lucero doctrine in
Mapa.
Atty. Lapadiday
Public Attorney | Learner | RULING:
Mass Communicator |
Professor | Boholana | 30 Decisions of this Court, under Article 8 of the New Civil Code states that
“Judicial decisions applying or interpreting the laws or the Constitution
But in the grand scheme of
things, I am but as shall form a part of the legal system … .” The settled rule supported by
insignificant as the lint in numerous authorities is a restatement of legal maxim “legis interpretatio
your belly button.
legis vim obtinet” — the interpretation placed upon the written law by a
competent court has the force of law.
FOOTER MENU WIDGET
Appellant was appointed as Secret Agent and Confidential Agent and
Home authorized to possess a firearm pursuant to the prevailing doctrine
About enunciated in Macarandang and Lucero under which no criminal liability
Contact Us would attach to his possession of said firearm in spite of the absence of a
Report Abuse license and permit therefor, appellant must be absolved. Certainly,
appellant may not be punished for an act which at the time it was done
ABOUT ME was held not to be punishable.

LAPADIDAY
The appellant was acquitted.

VIEW MY
COMPLETE
PROFILE
Categories: case digest, GR No. L-30061, People vs. Jabinal

RELATED POSTS:
IBP Statement on
Rappler CEO Case Digest: Kho vs. CA
Kho vs CA 
[G.R. No. 115758. March 19, 2002]
FACTS:
 In the
Maria Ressa and case at bar, the petitioner applied for
the issuance of a
Rey Santos Jr. preliminary injunctive o… Read More
Libel Case
Conviction
Case Digest: Ong Ai Gui vs. the Director of Patent Office, E.I. Du
 IBP Statement on Rappler Pont De Nemours and Company
CEO Maria Ressa and Rey G.R. No. L-6235        
    March 28, 1955
ONG AI GUI alias TAN AI
Santos Jr. Libel Case GUI, applicant-petitioner, 
vs.the Director of the Philippines
Conviction Patent Office, … Read More

Case Digest: Del Monte vs. CA


Del Monte vs.
CA
G.R. L-78325
FACTS:
Del Monte sued
respondent Sunshine Fruits Catsup for infringement, alleging
that the latter
was using a… Read More

Case Digest: Go-Tan vs. Tan


Sharica
Mari Go-Tan vs. Spouses Perfecto and Juanita Tan
G.R.
No. 168852
September 30, 2008
Facts:
Petitioner Sharica filed a
Petition with P… Read More
FOLLOWERS

Case Digest: People vs. Del Monte


SEARCH THIS BLOG G.R. No. 179940,
April 23, 2008
People vs. NORBERTO DEL
MONTE Y GAPAY alias
“OBET”
Facts:
Accused-appellant
questioned his conviction,
contendin… Read More
Search

Blog Archive ← Newer Post Home Older Post →


June 2020
(
2
)
0
comments:
April 2020
(
2
)
October 2019
(
1
) Post a Comment
July 2019
(
1
)
June 2019
(
10
)
Enter Comment
March 2019
(
3
)
February 2019
(
3
)
July 2018
(
2
)
June 2018
(
1
)
April 2018
(
1
)
March 2018
(
2
)
September 2017
(
1
)
June 2017
(
47
)
May 2017
(
3
)
October 2016
(
5
)
July 2016
(
13
)
March 2016
(
34
)

YOUR PERFECT STYLE


Nam eget nisi mauris.
Donec purus lacus, congue
eget tortor sed, dapibus
pretium ante

RECENT POSTS

This is my way of giving


back what has been given
to me. This is me, passing
it forward.

RECENT POSTS

PINTEREST

LIKE US ON FACEBOOK

Follow

Follow Over a Cup of Coffee

PAGES

FORMS

ANNOUNCEMENTS

BLOGROLL ABOUT

Case Digests: Over A C…


Like Page 8.3K likes
Copyright © 2022
Over a cup of Coffee and a pint of Insanity | Powered by Blogger

Design by FThemes | Blogger Theme by Lasantha - PremiumBloggerTemplates.com | NewBloggerThemes.com

You might also like