Professional Documents
Culture Documents
MFL floor Scanner with STARS Top & Bottom Defect Discrimination
FLOORMAP3DiM
MFL Floor Scanner with STARS Top & Bottom Defect Discrimination
Floormap3DiM
1
SECTION 1B - Floormap3DiM System Overview – Rev 1
Floormap3DiM
2
SECTION 1B - Floormap3DiM System Overview – Rev 1
3
SECTION 1B - Floormap3DiM System Overview – Rev 1
10
4
SECTION 2 – MFL and STARS technology – Rev 1
1
SECTION 2 – MFL and STARS technology – Rev 1
Magnetised Bar
Un-Magnetised
S
N
S N
N
S
N
N N N
N
N
N N
S
S N N N
S
Saturated Magnetised
Un-Magnetised
Saturated BarBar
Magnetised
2
SECTION 2 – MFL and STARS technology – Rev 1
Air gap
(Measuring flux leakage)
DIRECTION OF SCANNING
3
SECTION 2 – MFL and STARS technology – Rev 1
0.05
STARS Principle
Consider the magnetic bridge and MFL sensor array.
STARS sensor array are located below the rear pole piece.
The sensors measure the rate of change of the magnetic
field under the pole.
This rate is dependant on the field disturbance caused by
changes to the surface.
Bridge Permanent Magnets
11
STARS Principle
Bottom side indications have no effect on STARS sensors
because magnetic field under the pole does not change.
Top side indications cause a disturbance in the magnetic
field so the rate of change is measured by STARS sensors.
STARS technology has been developed by Silverwing.
Surface Topology Air-gap Reluctance Sensors
12
4
SECTION 2 – MFL and STARS technology – Rev 1
STARS Principle
The raw STARS view of the data is represented as a dark
then light rendered image. Similar to that of the MFL.
If there is a depression on the surface (corrosion pit for
example), the image is black then white.
DIRECTION OF SCANNING
DIRECTION OF SCANNING
13
Plate
Thickness
6mm 1.2mm 10.0mm 20.81mm3 2.4mm 13.7mm 109.48mm3 3.6mm 16.3mm 282.97mm3 4.8mm 18.2mm 542.87mm3
8mm 1.6mm 11.5mm 41.95mm3 3.2mm 15.5mm 215mm3 4.8mm 18.0mm 535.63mm3 6.4mm 20.0mm 1012.28mm3
10mm 2.0mm 12.5mm 70.16mm3 4.0mm 17.0mm 360.24mm3 6.0mm 19.5mm 876.50mm3 8.0mm 21.0mm 1574.99mm3
12mm 2.4mm 13.7mm 109.48mm3 4.8mm 18.15mm 541.06mm3 7.2mm 20.65mm 1290.67mm3 9.6mm 21.8mm 2229.37mm3
15
5
SECTION 2 – MFL and STARS technology – Rev 1
Straight edges from Burs around cut Incorrect tooling used Drill bit used
drill bit
16
18
6
SECTION 2 – MFL and STARS technology – Rev 1
19
u = 204 80%
u = 173 80%
u = 163 60%
u = 149 60%
u = 56 20%
u = 40 20%
u = 9 Background u = 10 Background
20
21
7
SECTION 2 – MFL and STARS technology – Rev 1
u = 142 80%
u = 120 60%
u = 104 40%
u = 47 20%
u = 8 Background
22
STARS Top
MFL
Severity
STARS
0.6
Bottom
23
65% BOTTOM
u = 174 81% TOP
u = 146
u=4
24
8
SECTION 2 – MFL and STARS technology – Rev 1
25
26
Dynamic Cursor
Dynamic cursor is a software approximation tool for
estimating geometry based on the calibrated geometry.
The dynamic cursor consists of two circles linked by a
mesh.
Outer Circle
Inner Circle
27
9
SECTION 2 – MFL and STARS technology – Rev 1
Dynamic Cursor
The diameter is determined for each percentages on the
MFL calibration trace by looking at the width of the MFL
signal a predetermined level below its peak.
Between each known percentages the diameter of the
80%
cursor changes linearly.
60%
The mesh has a tolerance of
+/-20% of the diameter.
40%
+/-20% of
diameter 20%
28
Dynamic Cursor
Typical examples of approximating defect geometry.
1. Indication lies between the inner and outer circle.
Likely to be accurately sized to the calibrated indications.
2. Indication lies outside of the outer circle.
Likely to be oversized and display a higher EPL than expected.
3. Indication lies within the inner circle.
Likely to be undersized and display a lower EPL than expected.
29
30
10
SECTION 2 – MFL and STARS technology – Rev 1
31
80%
60%
40%
20% Signal is above
the 3:1 ratio
20%
32
33
11
SECTION 2 – MFL and STARS technology – Rev 1
SMOT of 40%
34
35
Magnetic Saturation
This is a key fundamental element of MFL technology.
Factors that can affect the saturation level of a plate:
Magnet Strength.
Plate thickness.
Coating thickness.
Three main states of saturation levels:
Perfectly Saturated.
Over Saturated.
Under Saturated.
36
12
SECTION 2 – MFL and STARS technology – Rev 1
Magnetic Saturation
Perfect Saturation
This is the ideal case.
When a plate is fully saturated no flux leakage is evident until a
defect is present.
The flux leakage is proportional to the volumetric loss of the
defect so allows defects to be sized correctly.
37
Magnetic Saturation
Over Saturation
This is when there is flux leakage outside of the plate even
when no defect is present.
The flux leakage from a defect will be greater than its
volumetric loss.
This can increase the likelihood of noise and spurious
indications as it causes defects to be oversized.
38
Magnetic Saturation
Under Saturation
This is the least desirable case since the plate cannot achieve
saturation.
The flux leakage from a defect will be much smaller than its
volumetric loss.
This can increase the likelihood of indications being missed as it
causes defects to be undersized.
39
13
SECTION 2 – MFL and STARS technology – Rev 1
Corrosion Shape
MFL is considered as detecting defect volumetric loss.
Volumetric loss does not always reflex as defect depth.
The calibration links volumetric loss to a specific depth.
Consider the following defects:
Volume = Length x Width x Depth
depth
Lake Type 6 = 2 x 3 x 1 depth
depth width
Conical pit Type 6 = 1 x 3 x 2 depth width
length width
Pipe Type 6 = 1 x 2 x 3 length
width
length
length
Identical Volumes but at different Depths
How are percentage values affected by defects with the
same volume but a different depth?
40
Corrosion Shape
Lake Type
Large diameter compared to their actual depth. LAKE TYPE
Creates a large flux leakage signal.
The percentage value is expected to be oversized.
Conical Pit Type
Conical in shape with rounding at deepest point.
CONICAL PIT TYPE
Similar to the defect in the reference plate.
The percentage value is expected to be +10% accurate.
Pipe Type
Small diameter compared to their actual depth. PIPE TYPE
Creates a small flux leakage field.
The percentage value is expected to be undersized.
41
Corrosion Shape
Through Hole
Holes typically form at the deepest point of conical pits.
Leakage fields for holes can be very low since the field takes the
path of least resistance and so ‘jumps’ across the gap.
42
14
SECTION 2 – MFL and STARS technology – Rev 1
Scanning Orientation
Corrosion shape and geometry can result in different flux
leakage signals when scanned in different directions.
This results in different percentage values for the same
indication.
An example can be seen when transverse scanning.
Different percentage
values detected for
the same indications
Surface Origin
MFL alone cannot identify the surface origin of defects.
Bottom side defects generate a larger flux leakage field
compared to the same defect on the top side.
45
15
SECTION 2 – MFL and STARS technology – Rev 1
46
47
Reference Plate
Thickness
48
16
SECTION 2 – MFL and STARS technology – Rev 1
Simulated Coating
thickness
49
Surface condition
Tank floor cleaning is required before MFL inspection.
Dirty or rough inspection surfaces will cause spurious
indications and generate incorrect percentage values.
Ensure there is no scale, product residue, loose metal
and debris or any blasting cleaning media.
Surface condition
Mechanical defects will cause spurious indications and
generate incorrect percentage values.
This include weldment, weld spatter, grinding marks,
dented plates, blistered or delaminated coatings.
17
SECTION 2 – MFL and STARS technology – Rev 1
Practical Session
Exercise
Determine a Suggested Minimum Operational Threshold Level
for the following calibration traces:
52
Practical Session
Reviewing the Learning Outcomes
Describe the MFL principle and STARS principle.
Discuss the purpose of the calibration and reference plate.
Establish a percentage value and surface origin from the
calibration trace and detected MFL and STARS ‘u’ values.
Identify a suitable Suggested Minimum Operational Threshold
level based on the Signal to Noise Ratio of the calibration trace.
List the factors that affect MFL detection and discover how
each can alter the systems results.
53
18
MFL and STARS Technology – Learning Outcomes Review Questions
Establish a percentage value and surface origin from the calibration trace and
detected MFL and STARS ‘u’ values.
10. What data is used to determine the percentage loss value?
11. What must be known in order to assign a percentage loss value?
12. How is the surface origin of an indication determined?
13. What must be done to confirm the surface origin of an indication?
List the factors that affect MFL detection and discuss how each can alter the systems
results.
18. List factors can affect MFL detection.
19. What can affect the saturation level of a plate?
20. Which corrosion shape is the system designed to accurately detect?
21. Why are through holes expected to be undersized in the MFL results?
22. What is expected to happen to the MFL results when:
a. The MFL sensor head drops in height?
b. The coating thickness increases during the inspection?
c. Scanning across a rough inspection surface?
Doc Ref:
Rev: 1
Date of Release: June 2016
Page 1 of 1
SECTION 3 – MFL Tank Floor Inspection – Rev 1
Tank Floor
Soil Side
1
SECTION 3 – MFL Tank Floor Inspection – Rev 1
2
SECTION 3 – MFL Tank Floor Inspection – Rev 1
Scanning coverage
Achieving 100% scanning coverage of the plate is not
possible due to its mechanical constraints of the scanner.
Rectangular Plates
Minimum non inspected “dead zone” areas include:
10mm [3/8inch] around the plate edge.
160mm x 160mm [6.3inch x 6.3inch] in each corner.
Annular Plates and Sketch Plates
Non inspected “dead zone” area depends
upon the size and shape of the plates.
3
SECTION 3 – MFL Tank Floor Inspection – Rev 1
Inspection Team
Team Leader (TL)
Take overall responsibility for the inspection, including ensuring
the scanner has been correctly calibrated.
Fully understands the operation and limitations of the scanner.
Ensures the final inspection report is produced and indications
have been followed up (visual/handscan/ultrasonic).
MFL Technician
Fully understands the operation and limitations of the scanner.
Ultrasonic Technician
Trained and certified to a minimum of PCN, ASNT level II in the
use of A-Scan equipment and corrosion assessment.
MFL inspection team require a minimum of two people.
11
Inspection Equipment
Personal Protective Equipment (PPE)
Safety footwear
Overalls
Hard hat
Safety glasses
Gloves
12
4
SECTION 3 – MFL Tank Floor Inspection – Rev 1
Inspection Equipment
Lighting
Headlamps
Flood lamps
Marking out
Tape measures
Spray paints
Marker pens
Chalk sticks
13
Inspection Equipment
Cleaning tools for both scanner and inspection surface.
Brushes
Scrapers
Industrial vacuum cleaner
14
Inspection Equipment
Complementary Inspection Equipment:
Handscan – Inspection of areas not covered by the scanner.
Ultrasonic flaw detector / thickness gauge.
Coating thickness gauge (if inspecting coated floor plates).
Pit gauge.
Camera – Recording visual defects.
15
5
SECTION 3 – MFL Tank Floor Inspection – Rev 1
17
Image 1 – Floor plates cleaned to bare metal using Image 2 – Top surface corrosion visible after
Ultra High Pressure water jetting cleaning
18
6
SECTION 3 – MFL Tank Floor Inspection – Rev 1
Image 3 – Generally acceptable coated surface. Image 4 – Floor cleaned to acceptable standard.
Some spurious results possible from blistered areas. Corrosion at bottom of dents would not be detected
accurately.
19
Image 5 – Floor cleaned to acceptable standard Image 6 – Floor cleaned to acceptable standard
with some very thin scale remaining. with some very thin scale remaining.
20
Image 7 – 60mm thick layer of product residue Image 8 – Product residue masking top surface
corrosion
21
7
SECTION 3 – MFL Tank Floor Inspection – Rev 1
22
Image 11 – Thick build up of scale Image 12 – Uneven coated surface. The marked
area cannot be inspected.
23
24
8
SECTION 3 – MFL Tank Floor Inspection – Rev 1
25
26
?
Here Here
27
9
SECTION 3 – MFL Tank Floor Inspection – Rev 1
28
29
ROW 3
ROW 4
ROW 5
ROW 6
ROW 7
ROW 8
ROW 9
ROW 10
ROW 11
30
10
SECTION 3 – MFL Tank Floor Inspection – Rev 1
31
32
11
SECTION 3 – MFL Tank Floor Inspection – Rev 1
TL TR
11/
BL BR 4
34
Longest
1/2 Width 11/
4
Length
35
Vertical
Vertical
Length
11/
4
Horizontal
36
12
SECTION 3 – MFL Tank Floor Inspection – Rev 1
11/
4
37
Plate
Numbering
Orientation
38
39
13
SECTION 3 – MFL Tank Floor Inspection – Rev 1
Annular shape with parallel edge Annular shape with straight edge
40
41
42
14
SECTION 3 – MFL Tank Floor Inspection – Rev 1
43
Plate
Numbering
Plate
Plate Size
Reference
44
45
15
SECTION 3 – MFL Tank Floor Inspection – Rev 1
46
47
16
SECTION 3 – MFL Tank Floor Inspection – Rev 1
49
50
51
17
SECTION 3 – MFL Tank Floor Inspection – Rev 1
52
y y
x x - horizontal
53
54
18
SECTION 3 – MFL Tank Floor Inspection – Rev 1
Inspection Process
The following flow chart shows the sequence of work
required to perform a successful inspection with the system.
Work
Arrange for
safety man
Out of Tank
Procedures
(confined space) Check all Check Input
Battery
cables are sensor inspection
check
Tank history, secure heights details
Electrical power
floor plate
requirements &
thickness &
tank access
coatings
Carry out Conduct Calibrate on If required use
Ensure personnel have current safety gas verification suitable coating
passports / confined space / BA monitoring scan reference plate simulation sheets
certificates (if required)
55
Inspection Process
In Tank
Setup Investigate Verify Mark
Check tank Identify Tank Verify Plate
suitable tank coating weldments &
cleanliness Datum Thickness
lighting environment thickness obstructions
Identify areas of
Backup data interest, verify
to USB indications (UT
visual)
56
Practical Session
Identifying the plate setup information
Tank Datum
Layout 1
Answer a
Tank Datum
a 2/2
4/2
Top Left Top Right Horizontal X
Bottom Left X Bottom Right Vertical X
b 3/1
3/4
Top Left Top Right Horizontal X
Bottom Left X Bottom Right X Vertical X
57
19
SECTION 3 – MFL Tank Floor Inspection – Rev 1
Practical Session
Layout 2
Answer Tank Datum
b a
Tank Datum
a 16/4
2/1
Top Left Top Right Horizontal X X
Bottom Left X Bottom Right X Vertical
b 10/4
8/2
Top Left Top Right Horizontal X
Bottom Left X Bottom Right Vertical X
c 17/4
1/6
Top Left Top Right X Horizontal X
Bottom Left X Bottom Right Vertical X
58
Practical Session
Layout 3 Tank Datum
Answer a
Tank Datum c
Plate Number Plate Reference Plate Orientation Scanning Mode
Top Left Top Right Horizontal
a 5/13
3/7 Bottom Left X Bottom Right Vertical X X
b 5/19
3/1
Top Left Top Right Horizontal X X
Bottom Left X Bottom Right X Vertical
c 1/6
7/4
Top Left Top Right X Horizontal X
Bottom Left X Bottom Right Vertical X
59
Practical Session
Layout 4
Answer Tank Datum a
Tank Datum
c
60
20
SECTION 3 – MFL Tank Floor Inspection – Rev 1
Practical Session
Layout 5
Answer Tank Datum c
Tank Datum
b
61
Practical Session
Reviewing the Learning Outcomes
Establish the types of corrosion typically found on tank floors.
Recognise the limitations of scanning a tank floor.
Identify the roles within the inspection team and additional
equipment required for a successful tank floor inspection.
Assess the cleanliness of the tank floor for an MFL inspection.
Demonstrate the correct plate setup required for scanning,
identify the tank entry requirements and in-tank preparation.
Discover how to locate the MFL results for further prove up.
Utilize a correct sequence of work for inspecting a tank floor.
62
21
MFL Tank Floor Inspection - Learning Outcomes Review Questions
Identify the roles within the inspection team and additional equipment required for a
successful tank floor inspection.
8. What is the minimum number of personnel required for the MFL inspection?
9. What is the most important tool required when operating the scanner?
10. List additional equipment required for the inspection and its purpose.
Demonstrate the correct plate setup required for scanning, identify the tank entry
requirements and in-tank preparation.
14. Define Tank Datum.
15. What must the plate have in order to Raster scan?
16. What is the minimum man-way diameter required for scanner entry?
17. List the details that must be marked on every plate?
18. How is the spacing of the track width intervals marks determined?
Discover how to locate the MFL results for further prove up.
19. When conducting prove-up what location are the measurements taken from?
Doc Ref:
Rev: 1
Date of Release: June 2016
Page 1 of 1
Section 4 – Scanner components and maintenance – Rev 1
1
Section 4 – Scanner components and maintenance – Rev 1
2
Section 4 – Scanner components and maintenance – Rev 1
Battery
Damper
Encoder
Front Rollers
Front Magnet
Rear Magnet
Rear Rollers
64 Channels
300mm [12inch]
9
3
Section 4 – Scanner components and maintenance – Rev 1
10
System
Scanner Setupand Component Overview
MFL Sensor head
Old method New method
Adjustable height sensor head Fixed height sensor head
4 brass thumbnuts Red and silver bushes
Fixed height MFL sensor head reduces any setup errors by the
operator.
During the systems annual calibration the adjustable height
MFL sensor head are changed to the Fixed height sensor head.
11
12
4
Section 4 – Scanner components and maintenance – Rev 1
13
BLOWN FUSE!
IF the Green LED is lit after connecting a flat
battery check the fuse.
Replace with same rating fuse.
14
Battery Voltage
Power Switch Indicator
15
5
Section 4 – Scanner components and maintenance – Rev 1
16
17
Encoder
Encoder pickup
18
6
Section 4 – Scanner components and maintenance – Rev 1
19
20
21
7
Section 4 – Scanner components and maintenance – Rev 1
22
23
24
8
Section 4 – Scanner components and maintenance – Rev 1
25
A dent in the STARS sensor After damage has occurred a faint As the fault becomes worse during
head affects the scanned data grey line appear on each track the inspection the line get white
26
27
9
Section 4 – Scanner components and maintenance – Rev 1
28
29
Recommended Spares
Motor
Damper strut
MFL Sensor head
STARS Sensor head
Wired Encoder
30
10
Section 4 – Scanner components and maintenance – Rev 1
31
32
Practical Session
Practical Exercises
Removing the scanner from the transit case.
Correct manual handling of the scanner.
Correct technique for placing and removing the scanner from a
plate.
Battery Charging.
Removal of the MFL sensor head.
Packing the scanner back into transit case.
33
11
Section 4 – Scanner components and maintenance – Rev 1
Practical Session
Review of Learning Outcomes
Establish the operational hazards of the scanner.
Demonstrate correct manual handling of the scanner.
Demonstrate correct placement of the scanner onto a plate.
Locate and describe the components of the scanner.
Identify maintenance required during and after an inspection.
Examine key areas of the scanner to check for any damage.
Establish how to correctly store the scanner when not in use.
34
12
Scanner Components and Maintenance – Learning Outcome Review Questions
Doc Ref:
Rev: 1
Date of Release: June 2016
Page 1 of 1
Section 5 – Inspection Setup and Calibration – Rev 1
Scanner Setup
The scanner must be setup correctly before use and
involves:
1. Battery fitment.
2. Attaching the Sitemaster.
3. MFL Sensor head height setup.
4. STARS Sensor head height setup.
5. Powering ON the system.
1
Section 5 – Inspection Setup and Calibration – Rev 1
Scanner Setup
1. Battery fitment.
The battery must be positioned in the scanner so that it is lying
on its back with the terminals to the front, and to the top.
Incorrect battery position could cause the terminals to short
against the chassis.
Secure using the battery strap.
Always fit the battery and motor
cover during inspection to cover
the battery terminals.
Check hot work permits for
battery changing.
Scanner Setup
2. Attaching the Sitemaster
Brackets are used to secure the Sitemaster to the scanner.
Connect Sitemaster cabling to the scanner.
USB connector
on scanner
Sitemaster2
Power connector
Thumbscrews
2
Section 5 – Inspection Setup and Calibration – Rev 1
Scanner Setup
4. Setup of STARS sensor head height
The height is determined by the position of the retaining bolts
in the slots of the side plates.
Upper position is the recommended location.
A 4mm Allen key is required to alter the STARS sensor height.
Ensure the STARS sensor head is set so that is it level.
Lower position at the bottom of the slot Upper position at the middle of the slot
3
Section 5 – Inspection Setup and Calibration – Rev 1
Scanner Setup
5. Powering ON the system
Check all cables are connected and secure before powering on.
Once powered check the battery voltage displayed on the
scanner is above 11.5v.
Sitemaster power button is located on the right hand side.
Increase the screen brightness control if the screen stays black.
10
250mm Track
Track11
Track
[9.84inch]
50mm
0mm
Overlap
[1.97inch]
Track
Track22
300mm
300mm[12inch]
[12inch]
12
4
Section 5 – Inspection Setup and Calibration – Rev 1
Pre-calibration requirements
Questions to ask before the tank floor inspection:
What is the thickness of the tank floor?
Is there a coating on the tank floor?
What thickness is the coating?
Determine the nominal thickness for each floor plate.
Check and record a minimum of 3 Ultrasonic thickness reading
per plate.
Ideally 5 Ultrasonic readings per plate.
13
Pre-calibration requirements
MFL reference plate thickness must match the tank floor
plate thickness.
Available reference plate thicknesses are:
6mm – CP30 [1/4inch – CP72]
8mm – CP28 [5/16inch – CP74]
10mm – CP29 [3/8inch – CP75]
12mm – CP31 [1/2inch – CP76]
Acceptable to use a MFL reference plate within 1mm
[0.04inch] of the tank floor and preferably thicker than
the tank floor.
The reference plate must be clean of any debris.
14
Pre-calibration requirements
Tank Floor Coating thickness must be simulated using the
correct thickness coating simulation sheets.
Coating simulation sheet pack contains thicknesses of:
0.5mm [0.02inch]
1mm [0.04inch]
2mm [0.08inch]
3mm [0.12inch]
Coatings above 0.5mm [0.02inch] must be simulated.
Ensure a fully charged battery is fitted to the scanner.
The MFL and STARS sensor heights are correctly set.
15
5
Section 5 – Inspection Setup and Calibration – Rev 1
Performing a Calibration
Ensure the calibration is conducted in a similar
temperature range or climatic condition as the inspection.
The reference plate must not come into contact with any
other ferrous plates such as the tank floor plates.
Perform the calibration outside of the tank.
If calibrating inside tank raise the reference plate up above tank
floor by a minimum distance of 150mm [6inch].
Never pull the scanner back across the reference plate.
To calibrate select the correct plate and coating thickness
options then follow the onscreen instructions.
Save the calibration with a unique name.
Plate / Coating thickness, date, etc.
16
17
18
6
Section 5 – Inspection Setup and Calibration – Rev 1
19
20
21
7
Section 5 – Inspection Setup and Calibration – Rev 1
Loading a calibration
Only load calibrations that are still valid for the current
sensor height position and performed for the current
inspection.
If the sensor height position has moved then perform an
new calibration.
A greyed out Calibrate button indicated the current
calibration is associated with the current scanned plate.
To access the calibration window, click Scan and create a
new plate then close before performing a scan.
IMPORTANT!
It is never recommended to load an existing calibration. If a different
calibration is required, it is always advised to perform a new calibration to
ensure the calibration being used is accurate and applicable.
22
Practical Session
Practical Exercises
Battery fitment and removal. Performing a calibration and
Attaching the Sitemaster to viewing the trace
the scanner. Accessing calibration when
Setup of the MFL sensor button is greyed out
head. Loading an existing calibration
Setup of the STARS sensor Performing a Verification scan.
head. Calibration Exercise.
Powering the system ON and Effect of a Plate thickness
OFF. change.
Creating a New Inspection. Effect of a Coating thickness
Finishing an Inspection. change.
Loading an Inspection. Effect of an MFL sensor lift off.
24
8
Section 5 – Inspection Setup and Calibration – Rev 1
Practical Session
Review of Learning Outcomes
Demonstrate how to setup the scanner for an inspection.
Demonstrate how to create a new inspection.
Describe the purpose of the scan overlap function.
Establish what information is required for scanner calibration.
Performing a calibration and evaluating the calibration trace.
Conducting a verification scan and establishing if the calibration
is acceptable.
25
9
Inspection Setup and Calibration - Learning Outcomes Review
Questions
Doc Ref:
Rev: 1
Date of Release: June 2016
Page 1 of 1
Section 6 – Scanning the tank floor – Rev 1
1
Section 6 – Scanning the tank floor – Rev 1
Lap Weld
Lap Weld
Start Edge
2
Section 6 – Scanning the tank floor – Rev 1
Positive Offset value in Positive Offset value less Negative Offset value
front of plate reference than 160mm [6.3inch] behind plate reference
7
Transverse Scanning
Transverse scans are performed to minimise the non
scanned areas located at either end of the plate.
Scan direction is made perpendicular to normal plate
scans and is taken relative to Plate Reference.
Non scanned
Scan direction areas
towards Non scanned areas
located
Plate at the start
Reference located at the end
of the plate of the plate
3
Section 6 – Scanning the tank floor – Rev 1
Transverse Scanning
Scan location can be either at the:
Start plate edge which is against the plate reference.
End plate edge which is against the opposite edge to plate
reference.
Mid plate which is anywhere except the against the plate edges.
Measurement is from the plate reference to the damper.
Damper location
Plate
Reference
marker
10
11
4
Section 6 – Scanning the tank floor – Rev 1
1
3
1
3
1
3
15
5
Section 6 – Scanning the tank floor – Rev 1
16
1 2 3 1 2 3
1 3 2
17
A2 A3
1/3 1/4 1/5
1/1 1/2 1/6 1/7
2/1 2/2 2/3
A1 A4
18
6
Section 6 – Scanning the tank floor – Rev 1
19
20
21
7
Section 6 – Scanning the tank floor – Rev 1
23
Practical Session
Practical Exercises
Positioning, scanning, transverse and locating for prove up
Start scan offset with an obstruction
Resuming during the scan of a track
Selecting a completed scanned track to resume
Scanning around multiple plate obstructions
Using the load plate function when scanning around
obstructions
Annular plate scanning
Backup of inspection data
Removing old inspection data from the Sitemaster
24
8
Section 6 – Scanning the tank floor – Rev 1
Practical Session
Review of Learning Outcomes
Demonstrate correct scanner positioning during the inspection.
Identify what data captured during a scan is shown on screen.
Establish correct selection of transverse scan based on position.
Demonstrate how to resume scans around obstructions.
Discuss the practical limitations when scanning annular plates.
Locate where scanned data is stored and when data is saved.
Identify how to remove old inspection data.
25
9
Scanning the tank floor – Learning Outcomes Review – Questions
Doc Ref:
Rev: 1
Date of Release: June 2016
Page 1 of 1
SECTION 7 – Data Analysis and Reporting – Rev 1
1
SECTION 7 – Data Analysis and Reporting – Rev 1
2
SECTION 7 – Data Analysis and Reporting – Rev 1
Examples of
spurious
indications
detected at
a high EPL
value
Indications
Notice
Note
Clear the high
White ->signal
thevisible
top
seenside intensity
along
indications
track
parallel
Black change line.
linesedge
atparallel
45%
at the
across
and 100%.
track.
lines.
8
3
SECTION 7 – Data Analysis and Reporting – Rev 1
10
11
12
4
SECTION 7 – Data Analysis and Reporting – Rev 1
13
14
5
SECTION 7 – Data Analysis and Reporting – Rev 1
16
18
6
SECTION 7 – Data Analysis and Reporting – Rev 1
Practical Session
Practical Exercises
Data Analysis Exercises
Data Analysis Tutorials Plates
Data Analysis Exercise Plate A
Data Analysis Exercise Tank 1
Reporting Software
SIMS Tutorial Guide
SIMS Tutorial Tank
SIMS Tank Layout Modification Tutorial Layout
SIMS Exercise Tank A – F
SIMS Tank Layout Modification Exercises 1 – 5
19
Practical Session
Review of Learning Outcomes
Compare different methods of data analysis whilst inspecting.
Differentiate between the types of detectable indications.
Identify the appearance of relevant indications.
Establish possible causes of spurious indications.
Demonstrate how to analyse scanned data.
Demonstrate how to use the software to generate a report.
20
7
Data Analysis and Reporting – Learning Outcomes Review Questions
Doc Ref:
Rev: 1
Date of Release: June 2016
Page 1 of 1