You are on page 1of 9

QUANTITATIVE RESEARCH Reliable data

- process of collecting and analyzing - Data is taken and analyzed objectively


numerical data. It can be used to find from a sample as a representative of the
patterns and averages, make predictions, test population, making it more credible and
causal relationships, and generalize results reliable for policymaking and decision
to wider populations. making.

CHARACTERISTIC OF Replication
QUANTITATIVE RESEARCH - The Quantitative method can be repeated
to verify findings enhancing its validity, free
Large sample size
from false or immature conclusions.
- To obtain more meaningful statistical STRENGTHS OF QUANTITATIVE
result, the data must come from a large RESEARCH
sample size.
 Quantitative research can be
Objective replicated or repeated.
- Data gathering and analysis of results are  Findings are generalizable to the
done accurately, objectively, and are population.
unaffected by the researcher’s intuition and
 Conclusive establishment of cause
personal guesses. and effect
Visual result presentation  Numerical and quantifiable data can
- Data is numerical, which makes be used to predict outcomes
presentation through graphs, charts, and  Fast and easy data analysis using
tables possible and for better conveyance statistical
and interpretation. software.
Fast data analysis  Fast and easy data gathering
- The use of a statistical tools give way for a  Very objective
less time-consuming data analysis.
WEAKNESSES OF
Generalized data QUANTITATIVE RESEARCH
-Data taken from a sample can be applied to  It lacks the necessary data to
the population if sampling is done explore a problem or concept in
accordingly, i.e., sufficient size and random depth.
samples were taken.  It does not provide comprehensive
Fast data collection explanation of human experiences.

- Depending on the type of data needed,  Some information cannot be


collection can be quick and easy. For described by numerical data such as
feelings, and beliefs.
instance, a single survey form can be
administered simultaneously to collect  The research design is rigid and not
various measurable characteristics like age, very flexible.
gender, socio-economic status, etc.

1
 The participants are limited to - Used to establish the cause and effect
choose only from the given relationship of two or more variables.
responses. - Provides a more conclusive result because
 The respondents may tend to it uses random assignment of subjects and
provide inaccurate responses. experimental manipulations.
 A Large sample size makes data IMPORTANCE OF QUANTITATIVE
collection more costly. RESEARCH ACROSS FIELDS
KINDS OF QUANTITATIVE - The value of quantitative research to man’s
RESEARCH quest to discover the unknown and improve
underlying conditions is undeniable.
Descriptive design Throughout history, quantitative research
- is used to describe a particular has paved the way to finding meaningful
phenomenon solutions to difficulties.
by observing it as it occurs in nature. - The findings of the quantitative study can
- There is no experimental manipulation and influence leaders and law-makers’ decisions
the researcher does not start with a for crafting and implementing laws for the
hypothesis. safety and welfare of the more significant
majority.
- The goal is only to describe the person or
object of the study. VARIABLES IN QUANTITATIVE
RESEARCH
The correlational design
- A Variable is anything that has a quantity
- Identifies the relationship between
or quality that varies.
variables.
- If there is an existing relationship between
- Data is collected by observation since it
the independent and dependent variables,
does not consider the cause and
then the value of the dependent variable
Ex post facto design varies in response to the manipulation done
- Used to investigate a possible relationship on the independent variable. The
between previous events and present independent variable is also identified as the
conditions. presumed cause while the dependent
variable is the presumed effect.
- The term “Ex post facto”, means after the
fact, looks at the possible causes of an - In an experimental quantitative design, the
already occurring phenomenon. independent variable is pre-defined and
manipulated by the researcher while the
A quasi-experimental design dependent variable is observed and
- Used to establish the cause and effect measured.
relationship of variables. - For descriptive, correlational and ex post
- Has lesser validity due to the absence of facto quantitative research designs,
random selection and assignment of independent and dependent variables simply
subjects. do not apply.
Experimental design - It is important to note other factors that
may influence the outcome (dependent
variable) which are not manipulated or pre-

2
defined by the researcher. These factors are two levels of measurement of numerical
called Extraneous variables. Since data
extraneous variables may affect the result of A. Interval
the experiment, it is crucial for the
researcher to identify them prior to - are quantitative variables where the
conducting the experiment and control them interval or differences between consecutive
in such a way that they do not threaten the values are equal and meaningful but the
internal validity (i.e. accurate conclusion) of numbers are arbitrary. For example, the
the result. Controlling the extraneous difference between 36 degrees and 37
variable can be done by holding it constant degrees is the same as between 100 degrees
or distribute its effect across the and 101 degrees. The zero point does not
treatment. When the researcher fails to suggest the absence of a property being
control the extraneous variable that it caused measured. Temperature at 0 degree Celsius
considerable effect to the outcome, the is assigned as the melting point of ice. Other
extraneous variable becomes a Confounding examples of interval data would be year and
Variable. IQ score.
B. Ratio
The variables can also be classified - type of data is similar to interval, the only
according to their nature. The diagram difference is the presence of a true zero
below shows the different classifications: value. The zero point in this scale indicates
the absence of the quantity being measured.
Examples are age, height, weight and
distance.
II. Qualitative Variables
- are also referred to as Categorical
Variables are not expressed in numbers but
are descriptions or categories. It can be
KINDS OF VARIABLES AND USES further divided into nominal, ordinal or
dichotomous.
I. Quantitative Variables
A. Dichotomous
- also called numerical variables are the type
of variables used in quantitative research - are consisting of only two distinct
because they are numeric and can be categories or values. For example, a
measured. response to a question either be a yes or no.
A. Discrete variables B. Nominal variable
- are countable whole numbers. It does not - simply defines groups of subjects. Here
take negative values or values between fixed you may have more than 2 categories of
points. For example: number of students in equivalent magnitude. For example, a
a class, group size and frequency. basketball player’s number is used to
distinguish him from other players. It
B. Continuous variables certainly does not follow that player 10 is
- take fractional (non-whole number) values better than player 8. Other examples are
that can either be a positive or a negative. blood type, hair color and mode of
Example: height, temperature. transportation.

3
C. Ordinal variable  The year the study should not be
- from the name itself denotes that a variable indicated unless it is a historical
is ranked in a certain order. This variable study.
can have a qualitative or quantitative  Use current terminology
attribute. For example, a survey
questionnaire may have a numerical rating  5 to15 words are sufficient to
as choices like 1, 2, 3, 4, 5ranked describe the research study.
accordingly (5=highest, 1=lowest) or  Use the common name instead of
categorical rating like strongly agree, chemical formula (e.g., Ammonium
agree, neutral, disagree and strongly instead of NH4 )
disagree. Other examples or ordinal
variable: cancer stage (Stage I, Stage II,  Write and italicize full scientific
Stage III), Spotify Top 20 hits, academic names.
honors (with highest, with high, with  Make sure to reflect the tone of the
honors). paper.
RESEARCH TITLE GUIDE IN WRITING RESEARCH
- a concise description of the content of the TITLE
research study containing the fewest  Determine what it is that you wish
possible words, yet adequate to describe the to accomplish or know from your
contents of the paper study.
BASIC GUIDELINES IN MAKING A  Include important keywords and
RESEARCH TITLE variables.
 Use an accurate description instead  Shorten the title by eliminating
of using general terms. unnecessary words.
 Do not use abbreviations  Correct grammar and unnecessary
 Do not include words like “The errors if there is any.
study of,” “Analysis of,” “An  Observe proper formatting.
investigation of” or similar
construction as these would only BACKGROUND OF THE STUDY
lengthen the title. - Part of paper where you inform the reader
 Include the main dependent and of the context of the study.
independent variables. - Part of the paper where you justify the
need to conduct a research study about the
 Be mindful of the proper use of
topic selected by establishing the research
grammar and punctuation.
gap.
 Capitalize all nouns, pronouns,
RESEARCH QUESTION
verbs, adjectives, adverbs as well as
the first letter of the first and last Nature of quantitative research problem
words. - deals more with the precision and
 State in a declarative form. specificity of the problem
- describes trends and patterns of a
phenomenon

4
- focus on observing, describing, and
reporting factors or aspects of the research
RESEARCH QUESTIONS
problem.
- help clarify and specify the research
- how often/frequently, how many/much,
problem
what is/are, to what extent/degree, and the
- sub-problems of your research problem likes are used in these questions.
and are informative in nature
Correlational research
- specify the method of collecting and
- aim to determine the relationships among
analyzing data, and the type of data to be
two or more variables in your research
collected
problem.
CHARACTERISTICS OF GOOD
- usually begin with the phrases “Is there a
RESEARCH QUESTION
significant relationship... ” or “What is the
1. Feasible relationship between/among... ” .
- amount of time, energy, money, Ex post facto research
respondents, and even your current situation
- attempt to identify the causes of the
as a student-researcher.
phenomenon in the context of your research
2. Clear problem
- how the questions are stated lead to - no control or manipulation of variable has
agreement of meaning of the readers of your been done in order to cause the effect.
study
- cause of the problem already exists before
3. Significant you conducted your study
- ask if your research questions are relevant Experimental and quasi experimental
or important to ask.
- answers to these questions are brought
4. Ethical about by manipulation
- Always consider the welfare of people, - provide explanation to the causal
animals or whosoever are involved in relationship of variables
your study.
SCOPE AND DELIMITATION
FORMULATING RESEARCH
Scope
QUESTIONS
- specifies the coverage of your study such
Research question
as variables, population or participant, and
- generally classified into two: general and timeline.
specific
Delimitation
- The general question of the study is
- cites factors of your study that are not
derived from the research problem while the
included or excluded or those you will not
specific questions are anchored on the
deal in your study.
general research problem
COMPONENTS OF SCOPE AND
Descriptive research
DELIMITATION
 Topic of the Study

5
 Objectives or Problems to be - comes to life when a theory is being put to
Addressed the test, using observation and experiment.
 Time Frame 4.Logical Hypothesis
 Locale of the Study • expresses explanation with limited
evidence that can be verified logically
 Characteristics of the Respondents • reflects a relationship of the variables
 Method and Research Instruments which anchored based on logical phenomena
RESEARCH HYPOTHESIS 5. Statistical Hypothesis
Hypothesis - analysis of a portion of a population that
can be verified statistically.
- tentative statement about the relationship
between two or more variables - variables in a statistical hypothesis can be
transformed into quantifiable sub-variable to
- specific and testable prediction on what assess it statistically.
you expect to happen with the variables in
your study 6. Null Hypothesis
- proposes a possible relationship - Ho
between the independent variable and the - exists when you consider that there is no
dependent variable relationship between the independent and
- an “educated guess” of what possibly the dependent variables or that there is an
result would be of your research insufficient amount of information to claim
a scientific hypothesis
TYPES OF RESEARCH HYPOTHESIS
7. Alternative Hypothesis
1. Simple Hypothesis
- Ha
- prediction of the relationship between two
variables - an alternate statement expressed to be
tested in order to generate the desired output
- shows a connection between one when the empirical or working hypothesis is
independent variable and a single dependent not accepted
variable.
DIRECTIONAL AND NON-
2. Complex Hypothesis DIRECTIONAL HYPOTHESIS
- reflects the relationship between the Directional Hypothesis
independent variable and the dependent
variable. - relates the relationship between the
variables and can also predict its nature.
- expresses a connection between two or
more independent variables and two or more - illustrates the direct association of the
dependent variables. impact of the independent variable with the
dependent variable, whether it is positively
3. Empirical Hypothesis or negatively affected.
- “working hypothesis. ” Non-Directional Hypothesis
- presumed to explain certain facts and - no principle involved but there is a premise
relationships of phenomena
- reflects the association of the independent
variable to the dependent variable without

6
predicting the exact nature of the direction INPUT- IV
of the relationship. PROCESS- Methodology, Research
- relationship is not specified as negative or instrument, Statistical Treatment
positive. OUTPUT- DV, result/outcome

DEFINITION OF TERMS DEFINITION


GUIDELINES IN FORMULATING OF TERMS
HYPOTHESIS 1. Conceptual Definition
 Spend time researching about your - dictionary/encyclopedia (general)
topic and other related studies
2. Operational Definition
 Dependent and independent variable
must be included in hypothesis. - based on the study (specific)

 Relationship of your variables must WORDS TO USED


be reflected in your hypothesis  Not common
 Simple and specific as possible  Specific/unique meaning
 Concise and comprises clear and BENIFITS OF HAVING A DEFINITION
specific language OF TERMS
 Should be testable  Useful place to include technical
 Must be falsifiable terms

CONCEPTUAL AND THEORETICAL  Clarify the definition of terms


FRAMEWORK  Makes it easier to revisit or check
Theoretical Framework the meaning of a term
- formal theory  Ensure the reader can understand the
technical terminologies and jargons
- primarily support the problem
GUIDELINES ON HOW TO WRITE
- tends to be used in quanti research THE DEFINITION OF TERMS
Conceptual Framework  Write a brief introductory statement
- show the relationship among the ideas and
 Write the words/terms that would be
how they relate to research study.
included
TWO VARIED TYPES OF
 The term should be arranged
CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK
alphabetically
1. IV-DV model
 It can be underlined or not
IV- the researcher changes
 It does not have to be lengthy
DV- being tested
 It can be bold
2. IPO Model

7
 Acronym/Initials should be defined  Clarify misconceptions & help
clearly refocus, polish and contribute
 Brief and basic
(I DIDN’T INCLUDE THE
STRUCTURE KASI BASIC LANG
NAMAN)

REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE


TYPES OF LITERATURE REVIEW
- Compilation of studies to a specific area of
1. Context Review
research
- Focus on contextual aspect
- Evaluates, classifies and summarizes all
the relevant previous studies conducted on a - Relates the study to a larger body of
specified topic. knowledge
- Justify your research by exposing the gaps - Merging it into a wider framework
of previous study 2. Historical Review
- Provides support and full comprehension - Organized according to the period of time
of the development in the field
- Chronological order-oldest period of time
3 Ways of using Literature Review going to the most recent
 Providing context as a foundation 3. Integrative Review
 Compare your findings from other - Introduce & summarize the recent
previous related studies knowledge of the study
 Starting what contribution your study - Emphasize the agreement & disagreements
Purpose of Literature Review of knowledge

 Discover the connection of your 4. Methodological Review


research - Summarizes the strengths & gaps in
 Identify more theories/concept methodological aspects illustrates the effects
of different methodologies
 Determine the relationship of your
5. Self-study Review
research w/ previous studies to
prevent duplication - Demonstrate understanding of a specific
body of knowledge
 Acquire knowledge on the accuracy
& significance of your question - Contains existing proofs
 Acquaint yourself w technical 6. Theoretical Review
terminologies - Introduces several theories or concepts
 Determine possible gaps, conflicts - Particular on the theories and concepts and
and open questions left from other compare them to the current study
researchers

8
TYPES OF SOURCES FOR A
LITERATURE REVIEW
General references
- Researcher refers to track down others
sources
- identifies and locate information

Secondary references
- Provides second-hand information
STEPS IN WRITING LITERATURE
REVIEW
 Find/search for relevant literatures
 Log/catalouge & synthesize
 Outline & write up
IN-TEXT CITATIONS AND
REFERENCING STYLES
- A reference to a literature being used in
your study
- Gives acknowledgement to the author
- Citations include author’s name, date,
publisher info, journal info
In-text citation
- made within the body of text in the paper
- it leads the reader to source where a
particular info has been taken of
- should be reflected when you prefer,
paraphrase, summarize or quote from
another author
References
- includes only the sources that you have
mentioned
Bibliography
- all sources you used is included

You might also like