GROUP CLASS REPORT/PRESENTATION

TOPIC REPUBLIC ACT No. 7925

NAME OF RATER VELASCO, PHILLIP LORENZO B
REPORTERS NAME: GROUP 2
Rebecca Sorreda
Ethan Darrell Sta.Maria
Mark Cristian Carele

Rating Scale: 5 – Excellent; 4 – Very Satisfactory; 3 – Satisfactory; 2 – Fair; 1 – Needs Improvement

CRITERIA INDICATORS RATING

Presentation content shows a thorough understanding of the topic.
1 Presentation Content Substantive research effort is evident in locating relevant information and 5 4 3 2 1
facts. Content is accurate and sequenced in a clear, logical way.
Slides are visually well designed, aesthetically pleasing with appropriate use
of white space, visuals, and minimal text, on each slide. Color and animations
2 Presentation Design are used judiciously. Theme (e.g., template) is evident throughout to produce 5 4 3 2 1
a highly cohesive presentation. Basically, free from errors (grammar,
punctuation, spelling, formatting, etc.) on the slides.
Highly effective in delivering a well-polished oral presentation within the time
Presentation Oral
3 limit for the group to present. All group members presented equally. 5 4 3 2 1
Delivery
Preparation was strongly evident.
Demonstrates strong enthusiasm about topic during entire presentation
Enthusiasm/ Audience Significantly increases audience understanding and knowledge of topic;
4 5 4 3 2 1
Awareness convinces an audience to recognize the validity and importance of the
subject

Timeliness and Length of Collaborative presentation is completed by the deadline and meets the
6 5 4 3 2 1
Presentation required length
TOTAL
22/25
AVERAGE
Adapted from Rubric by Denise Kreiger, Instructional Design and Technology Services, SC&I, Rutgers University, 4/2014